From an overview of the candidates: "Carolyn Beaumont, 17, of Arlington, investigated how the quantity of added water affects the viscosity of magma, a key factor in the violence of volcanic eruptions, for her Regeneron Science Talent Search earth and planetary sciencesproject. Current infrared spectroscopy models suggest that the amount of water reacting with magma to make it runny ultimately levels off, leaving the magma’s polymer bonds stretched but intact. Using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Carolyn showed that the degree to which water breaks apart magma polymers actually rises in proportion to the total amount of water present."
@@Egregius wtf ? This just sounds like what an undergraduate student would do not a highschool one. I'm pretty sure they got half of the work done by their teachers, parents, ...
true. Regardless of whether it was an original invention or not, I totally see that as a cheap alternative to medical equipment. If he hasn't patented it and founded a startup in two years or less, he is wasting time.
The first one was genius because of the polar fluid being charged, but the calculations that would have gone into the cosmology project is mind-blowingly complex and impressive.
Nah, the calculation for the 1st one is more complex. I mean you're dealing with 2 non-ideal fluids and you need to be precise as hell. That's some pretty advanced fluid mechanics. But it's likely that he found the relation between concavity/convexity and potential experimentally, and not theoretically. On the other hand, space girl just had to deal with a little bit of circular motion.
Most likely not the first to think about it, but remember there is a vertical monopoly in the eye world. Look up Luxottica. They not only own brands, and optometrist offices. They also own insurance companies as well. Bet they also own the locations that make the phoropters. No money for them if they find a cheaper way.
You're misinterpreting his work. People have thought of using liquid lenses for these applications for a number of years. In fact they are already being used in some ophthalmology and optometry clinics already.
That technology has been around for a while. His implementation seems like a good idea, but using smartphones with such low resolution, I'm assuming (just from the footage) would give pretty inaccurate results. It's obviously just a prototype though. I'd like to have seen a comparison between his real prescription and the one the kid's machine came up with.
The reason it is so impressive is helped through the simplicity of the idea. It should reduce costs in the future mainly due to the limited resources used and the basic concept.
@@somedudeok1451 That's how a lot of things are. They seem simple in hindsight and yet the fact is they weren't invented sooner. It's similar to when people criticize abstract art for being something they themselves could easily make (ie white canvas paintings) except they fail to realize that it wasn't as obvious and simple as they think it was since they didn't even consider it until they saw the end result. Essentially, while coming up with novel ideas is NP hard, verifying them can often be done in polynomial time.
His invention was NOT the frikkin lense! It was even explained. His innovation is a device that can cheaply be 3d printed and doesn't need a 20ft room!
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 There are already a lot of devices, which doesn't need the 20ft room. So that wasn't his idea either. He combined cheap small parts with phone to make the device.
@@user255 He might not be the only one with such a device. But he has something with potential. Be negative all you like but I always applaud people who are creative, even if some parts seem "copied".
@@aimu_1111 He is just using the smartphone for convenience, the software can go on a chip and all you need is one switch for input, I wouldn't be impressed if that system costs less than 3€ to make.
Ain't no millions to be made in providing poor areas with an easy alternative to measure eye sight. This is the reason why so many things that are needed are not provided.
Charles Okonkwo you sir are completely ignorant to how supply and demand works. If he can mass produce his affordable invention in middle class areas with the pitch that every one purchased goes to someone who needs one and can’t afford it, everyone wins. Also, this idea isn’t even new, it’s already been done by successful people.
@@pahom2 You're the 100th one that hasn't watched the video. The lense wasn't the invention, the Phoropter that can be 3d printed and doesn't need a 20ft room is!
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 I mean it was a tiny bit misleading. They did first explain the liquid lense and they never said that he did not make the components. But you should be able to tell by the quality of the lense compared to the 3d printed part.
I knew that girl would win. I couldn't understand 95% of what she talked about. The other two will probably make money off their inventions since there are practical everyday uses for them, especially the first dude.
@@dennispremoli7950 Yeah but no one really thought about it. The adult scientists just thought that what we saw in our telescope are more than enough. She won precisely because of that. A very simple mathematical graph that no one even thought of. Now it will be used even in our own solar system to try to find out the other moons in the other planets.
Apparently his idea wasn't that novel: www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-14507-5#Fig1 Plus, this was not a peace price, but a science price. He used existing science to do engineering. She used existing science to innovate in the field of exoplanet research. If here innovation leads to the discovery of many new exoplanets then she may be nominated for a Nobel price in physics. She also obviously know far more about physics than he does if you compare their achievements, so she probably made a great interview. Not to say that the boy's contribution wasn't impressive. But she is the kind of person that gives names to methods in astronomy. One day she may be remembered as a house hold name in astronomy.
@@gilang4838 The current method using a variety of solid lenses, BUT his using basically in simple terms, a lens that changes from the manipulating of an electric current. As such he replaced a number of lenses with one lens. At least that how I understood it
He is on right track; right now his device is over-simplified, not taking into account many conditions/disease states, but I'm sure with time he will improve it. Getting a provisional patent is first step
Here in India the students are under a lot of stress and pressure about getting into the top colleges that it kills all the creative desires that these people have build their project upon! It is a sad scenario but I hope things will change and we will also move ahead in Science!
But we can put a little more effort to improve situation after watching this video my concept about study is completely changed now I want to be more innovative
@@SuperExodian tbf, youtubers have more money then they should, when you consider the ignorance that is driving this world to its demise. We need more science and support for science, if we hope to have more generations living on this planet and elsewhere. F spoiled brats with money, and the degerates promoting that lifestyle.
@valy0f Not all innovation is scientific, but I'm just being pedantic. Either way, the point isn't that engineering is unscientific, it's that (at least according to Derek) the prize is specifically for research.
@valy0f Actually scientific research is about discovering new technologies and formulating new knowledge about the world where engineering is about how to take these ideas and discoveries and finding practical ways to use them. And of coarse there are scientists who are also engineers but the two tasks are fundamentally different and require completely different skill sets and entirely different ways of thinking. As an engineer myself I can tell you that they are very different but engineers still follow the scientific process in that we come up with different models or solutions and test them against the problem to see which works best and try and come up with solutions to better improve the next iteration based on the findings, etc. so yes engineering is scientific but it is not scientific research, that is a completely different field. And yes you could argue that some engineers approach things less scientifically and use what you could call a shotgun approach and although this can be effective it can often lead you into trouble such as the hyperloop, or waterseer, or any of the other BS pseudoscience that keeps coming out that needs constant debunking. There really should be a second field of science that specializes in debunking BS from other engineers as scientists have a rigid method they use to peer review their work and test their hypothesis and can be more resistant to logical fallacies but engineers are not so lucky and can easily fall victim to these logical fallacies if they aren't careful when trying to think of a solution.
Not so fast! There are engineering problems to be solved. The main one is calibration. Imagine trying to measure length with a rubber ruler, that you stretch to match the length being measured. After getting clear vision, how do you measure what refraction the lens is giving? This sort of thing tends to vary "with the phase of the moon" in addition to the voltage applied. There is also problems even getting the same curvature over the whole field of the lens. Gravity and temperature also have roles. Phoropter could be made much smaller and lighter without this liquid technology. (I know, I made one for one eye only that you hold like a wand). There is also the problem of the algorithm to display the lenses in the proper order (to allow correct measurement of patient (without corruption due to patient's accommodation), and for measurement of astigmatism. I do not know if the student addressed this in his design. I would like to see his paper!
I think won't it be a little inaccurate considering the fact that it could be affected by the ambient temperature the resistivity of the material used for the wires and some errors in the calculation of voltage applied sense obviously theoretical varies from practical practices
billionaire? lol no... he just put his project out there for the world to see. Only a matter of time before some startup with millions to spend takes this up on their own.
I would love to know if there is a significant correlation between winners of some science contest like this and actually successful researchers. The projects were fascinating and they were punching way above their weight class, but I don't see that happening without an already wealthy, well educated family background and I'm not sure (in either direction) whether it translates into anything long term. I'd love to know!
of the three, I think Ana's was the only one that had a much lower business potential and much higher academic potential. As the assistant prof in caltech mentioned, it sounded real close to a thesis for post grad research.. The other two seemed more like they were applying existing tech to create new products, and thus didn't really have as much of a potential for further research.
@@secretunknown2782 well I’d say in these situations applications and executions matter. Sure the calculations for stable orbits and the theory about packed solar systems existed before but applying them in a novel way to extract more information from existing data is no small achievement in its own. Otherwise the exact same argument could be made for the two other projects which was also great.
@@sandraviknander7898 but the function she came up with is just comparing how much mass can a planet have in certain orbits, I know they're just highschoolers but that's not that hard to do.
Here is a thing any invention now a days meant to improve the society isnt as important as an invention that is meant to advance the society. But both the girl with arsenic detector and guy with glasses would make tons on money then the girl who won first price will every do.
This is a prize for original research. The device Ronack invented is a novel and useful one, but it is not ground breaking research when compared to Ana Humphreys work. She broke new ground in astronomy and may have significant impact on future research. She was the clear winner. also it should be noted he did not invent the liquid lens, and there have been similar applications in the past. Just in case that was a factor you might have considered.
Indian system is not that bad At least not worst than American In india you can do masters for less than 1k if you are smart enough to crack entrance That opens up the lots of doors for poor kids In america you need to get big loan just for clg fees
@@noobofnoob3591 Indian system is bad not in terms of money, But how it gives very little credit to the creativity and talent of students and its notorious for shoving unnecessary subject down students throat. I think anyone who spent significant time in any Indian education systems (with some exceptions) would know that the only thing matters in there is how well you can remember stuff, It doesn't matter if you actually understand it. Don't even get me started on quotas, The dumbest thing in Indian education system.
@@wlockuz4467 yes surely indian education system is not best in the world or perfect in any sence And yes quotas are the worst But still its way better than American system for sure where most of the citizens can't have access to higher education at all. And when you talk about highest standard universities like IITs you can see education is quality is brilliant there and cost is minimal Its just you need to work very hard to get in there.
Dang. I just finished my senior capstone engineering project at one of the best engineering schools in the country and that project is less impressive than these high schoolers' projects.
it sure feels shitty when you know yourself capable of great things while not achieving full potential, that's why i think that keeping youth around, helps humble and inspire us, never late to do something you love
@@stop6578 I'm a mech. eng. as well! I can't say too much cause of confidentiality stuff, but essentially it was researching and testing of a rain simulation system for autonomous vehicle testing. Was actually an interesting project in theory but the result was certainly less impressive than these high schoolers' projects
OMG!!! I learned about optic geometry and celestial mechanics only in my first year undergraduate to see 3 of them pulling this much level of science for a high school. I am so amazed. Well done.
I thought for sure the first guy was gonna win it. His was the easiest to understand and in my opinion has a bigger impact on the real world than the other two.
his project has a bunch of flaws namely calibration and temperature + pressure affecting the liquid lens; additionally the screen resolution is too low for accurate measurements… its good but not nearly as brilliant as anas work
@@juliand3565 But ana's work sounds just like gravitational fields. i mean she wrote the equation on the board and that was it. The way she explained it makes sense but it wasn't really like cutting edge. If she was the first person to come up with that then I guess she deserves more credit. But I feel like that's so generic that someone had to have already started exploring that. Wouldn't this be baked into the packed planet solar system hypothesis? If a solar system is to have as many planets as possible then of course that means they would have to be packed in such a distance to not throw off ones orbit/gravitational field otherwise they wouldn't be planets? Or maybe I'm just too dumb to get it which is probably the case
@@brimmed if that’s what you believe you didn’t understand the project ! her explanation was very simplified because theres more than 2 bodies in most systems and solving for more than 2 bodies is extremely difficult. in fact solving for 3 bodies alone is one of the more famous problems in physics ;)
@@brimmed That's how they discovered Pluto and how they tried to discover "Planet X"... She really hasn't discovered anything new, so she doesn't serve it... Neither of the three deserves it actually, the first one isn't stable enough, the second one is a rip-off, the third one is something that already exists...
You’re not alone 99.99999 also does. those kids have a gift and are very talented and I am very proud of them because they’re using their gift for a honorable goal which will benefit all of us
My strategy was always to try and memorize as many equations as i can then just write them all down when i'm handed the test.. managed to get my BS using that OP strat. and some classes let us use graphing calculators. shout out TI for coming up with the TI Nspire letting me type notes on my calculator and putting images on it
Thanks for promoting the Regeneron STS Derek! I was a semifinalist (top 300) in 2017 and though I obviously didn't win, it was such a fantastic experience to just get recognized for my research as a high school student (the money was pretty great too)! I wish I was a finalist just so that I could see all the brilliant research being done that year. Still doing science in college!
Brett_Kendrick This is a prize for original research. The device Ronack invented is a novel and useful one, but it is not ground breaking research when compared to Ana Humphreys work. She broke new ground in astronomy and may have significant impact on future research. She was the clear winner. also it should be noted he did not invent the liquid lens, and there have been similar applications in the past. Just in case that was a factor you might have considered.
@@unlincecosmico6192 oh dear, engineering is a science!!! I think that she was ground-breaking thats why she won, she figured out an answer to a question that no one had answered
They are obviously all good, but it's true she looks completely moved by what she's doing, so passionate, but also so straight to the point and sharp. Amazing work!
Thought the lense thing was much more useful than finding planets (Doesn’t meant I disagree with their decision he’ll surely make plenty of cash off of his thing)
At first I also thought the eye guy would win. But observe what happens when Ana is shown: Veritasium introduces Ana and cuts to a small segment on Kepler. He then cuts to her talking about the work she did, interlacing it with commentary on his own. She explains it clearly and tackles his questions with no flash and no fuss. Basically a it suddenly feels like a normal Veritasium video. Now, ask yourself who the star of said video tends to be: some senior scientist or other.
Not really, I've participated in STS in high school, almost every student there has a mentor that did almost all the thinking for them. Sure, the students put work into the project, but the originality almost always comes from some professor they emailed a few months prior.
@@justindie7543 Just sitting in a room and typing that it was all done with their professor or teachers help to demean their work. You are so smart Sir. If you can't do something for the world or nation or any community then it's better you don't give your opinions.
@@prashantsolanki007 Look, I'm no different. I did it too. I even won a small prize if that's anything to be proud of. I think the secret to making the world a better place is to know how the real world works, not to believe in some spoon fed fantasy. I think you should dwell on that.
@@justindie7543 To categorically state that "almost every student" had someone else doing the work for them is pretty demeaning, particularly to those that won the top prizes. I'm sure there were students that got help. But your original comment really comes off as sour grapes when we should be proud of these young people, and assuming the best about them. Honestly, I really rather wish you'd posted your own main comment, rather than tarnishing my praise for them.
@AJ I know what you mean. They want to do great things, and their hard work is not for a piece of paper. I feel the same; I didn't get a science degree just to have a piece of paper. I love science and my idols is Neil deGrasse Tyson and Carl Sagan. I'm just saying that even with my years of education, they are very special and still surpass me.
Three super bright minds with great ideas! And randomly seeing Ana ask a question at the black hole press conference really proves how passionate she is!
At 9:15 I ALSO WAS EXCITED!! she was so confident and as you stated the winner wasn't solely chosen for their work &that it would also require interviews and explanations. I knew she had it in the bag. Awesome!
When in highschool I spent about 6 hours/day, every day, for about three years, playing world of warcraft, vanilla and tbc. Guess I could have made crazy science projects instead.... But I could do them now! Got alot more resources today aswell! I'm gonna do it! Hell yeah! Wait, what? WoW classic is coming out 27th of august!? OMFG!
nah, it's the extreme overachievers, she's not common, and there is nothing special about her abilities except for what she used them to do with it. she had a mutation or a very smart mother
Actually yes, most people are supposed to be that smart. We are all born with the capabilities, its up to you to make use of them. Ever hear of the term "Use it or lose it". Exercise your brain before it shrivels up.
These students also all probably had help from teachers or even university professors. Like yes they're incredibly smart but they also probably had help
I mean, at a high level, when it's explained to me, I understand their projects and the science/math behind them. But I don't think I would ever have had the ingenuity or creativity to come up with these things myself. That's what I think separates these guys (and others of course) from the rest of us dumb dumbs. Hope they all get the recognition the rewards they deserve.
For the planet one, how I understood it is that there is space between planet’s orbits that could possibly fit another planet’s orbit that we haven’t discovered yet. For the arsenic water one, the machine basically turns arsenic from your water into a gas, so that the strip can detect it. After that, the strip darkens, and the darkens of your strip indicated how much arsenic is in the water. Ex: very light is very low arsenic, and very dark is a lot of arsenic. I’m just a middle school student, so keep in mind I might be completely wrong about these explanations, but I did my best to explain them. (Also I’m replying to a comment from 2 years ago so I doubt the original commenter will see this)
Nice explanation Ur spot on although I'm not sure either but that's exactly what she meant by its like how many electrons fit in an orbit kinda of a thing, the Planet might be there because of the math but In real life it might not but it's more likely to be there, as she said the system is more likely to have the planet there because systems are more likely to be filled but at the end of the day it's a sort of theory I guess
Her mathematical model explains the maximum possible orbits for a planet between the two planets without actually disturbing the orbits of original planets. I also had trouble understanding it at first. I had to do a thought experiment to understand what she was talking about. I am still not sure if I understand it correctly.
@@technicalmaster4054 She was trying to find spots in that system that a body with the minimum mass of a planet could exist in whilst not disturbing the percieved orbits of the planets that passed in front of the sun during those four years. The only reason why there would probably be planets in any of the 250 something possible spots is if the planet packing hypothesis was correct. She was only finding areas that the theoretical small mass planets could be without being detected.
Holy crap!! These kids are geniuses. The research they've done is so amazing and can literally be life-changing. Congratulations to all the finalists and winner!!
Being geniuses, they will save the world tomorrow. Oh, hang on, they would have not to be imprisoned within specific areas of expertise to be able to do that, since the world includes everything. Oh well. On the other hand, if someones mind was a genius at lateral/horizontal thinking, and thus peered into ALL areas at the same time, one could at least understand not just the world, but the entire concept of reality itself at the base or foundation level. Such a person would be the first in the world to have done this. However, due to this person having shown to the world that he or she had no expertise in any specific category in today's world of science etc., the person at best will be categorized as being nothing but a jack of all trades, and a master of none. In turn, the smartest person in the world would be laughed at, and/or ignored. So much for saving the world then. Bummer !
so her work was ground breaking, glasses guy was not original as hers. She was really knowledgeable as well, her knowledge of mathematics and physics also seemed superior as well. And her research was shown to senior researchers and teh fact that they said this was either a senior undergrad level, even postgrad level research is VERY telling!
@@ArunaKhudan Plenty of postgrad students whose big potential research turned out to be useless in the end. They are dime a dozen. Not crapping on her work though. But it needs a lot more work to be proven.
That's more the role of engineering. This is a science competition, so I think their choice was totally justified. Plus, we don't have all that much information; we just saw a 2 minute interview with each contestant.
so doesn't the american one, unless you have money, these kids in most cases either came from schools in neighborhoods with money or their parents were exceptional, I'm not taking from these kids, just that there would be a lot more if those factors were improved.
Very happy for her but I knew it'd be her all along and thought it was kinda unfair. The fact that I knew due to her topic being cool and not because of how meaningful and impactful it could be for human life proves that.
Yeah just compare the number of engineers that win Nobel prize to physics people. To be fair her work is probably more in line with the spirit of the competition in furthering scientific knowledge. On the other hand, the two engineers will probably have much greater immediate impacts on society (plus engineering pays better in terms of careers and entrepreneurship opportunities!)
@@InsaneSheepo it makes sense, theoretical physics needs funding because it does not pay off financially but in terms of future discoveries and better understanding of how our universe behave like it does.
Most schools don't though. :( I was told by my 6th grade teacher who was amazing in all other respects said we would never be able image an actual atom or molecule.... but we can: photoionization microscopy and various methods of electron microscope.
Yep, I would have picked her too. No doubt. The other two were brilliant upcoming engineers, no question, but Anna seems to be already a genuine scientist. The way she talks, the way she thinks - that's more than just tinkering with electronics, that's some proper fundamental science there ;)
The first one was totally fantastic and new. But i was pretty much sure Ana was the winner. Astronomy is a very hard topic to go under, specially if you want to rethink the stuff that already exist.
@@sayanorasonic Astronomy is just timepass science. I am eager to know how will your life change after finding planets 10 light years apart.Would be fun to know. Don't get fooled by Physics and Space lobby of Earth.
It's highly likely that these kids are already being courted by science agencies or tech companies, or are already on their radar. Many of them are probably knowledgeable at a doctoral level, even though they're still in high school. Their futures are solid. It's the brighter-than-average kids in poor schools that need the encouragement.
As a senior myself, I find all of their inventions to be interesting and can’t imagine how the first and third brought it to life. But I knew she’d be te winner cause it’s literally equations and such a basic but unique approach, which none of the PhDs have already found out
I thought it was going to be the eyetest guy as well, but I think the reason for that is that we didn't get a fully expanded explanation for Anna's work, which is why it felt a bit like she didn't initially take top spot in my ranking before the reveal.
Very true. Eye-test guy has several mechanical issues and difficulties he still hasn't solved. Amazing prototype, but might still need more work. Ana, on the other hand, has produced a PAPER with a deceptively difficult algorithm that she programmed. Believe it or not, analyzing data like that (imagine the only data you get is flashes of light) is very hard.
and also the other 2 while being smart would need a lot of funds from parents to make the prototypes its not like they did everything them self in designing it either
aryamanW, the girl win because her finding will make scientist save millions $$... plus it’s a quick « plug-n-play » innovation that demand no cost of production to get used. Yeah, money always rules, even over health !
Not the whole paper but an abstract here, if you control F "Ana". You can also read all the other abstracts too! There's some dope stuff in here. sspcdn.blob.core.windows.net/files/Documents/SEP/STS/2019/Regeneron%20STS%20Finalist%20Book%202019.pdf
Scientists and engineers have no problem paying off student debts. Purple lesbian quantum feminist dance theory specialists may have trouble finding relevant work.
@walentaz also vsauce kinda cheat with copycat stealing other people ideas, but present as they were the original creator. I lost interest watching them
why not farmville its so much more fun not that ive tried minecraft but i play matching with 3 on facebook while watching series.. and listen music on lower vollume to keep up the nervous systems' static things
This is a prize for original research. The device Ronack invented is a novel and useful one, but it is not ground breaking research when compared to Ana Humphreys work. She broke new ground in astronomy and may have significant impact on future research. She was the clear winner. also it should be noted he did not invent the liquid lens, and there have been similar applications in the past. Just in case that was a factor you might have considered.
Q R can u explain how come its groundbreaking her work is actually an hypothesis. Also he used the application of lenses in making that thing. Which is appreciable and is going to be beneficial in economic terms.
the other kids idea was brilliant too, it might not have practical application like eye sight testing , and water quality testing but finding exoplanet without observing dip directly would have more direct impact for progressing science.
That's the sad reality But that's because of difference in the population. Seriously bro! Just 2000 students? These are much much less than that of a city! I am very jealous from this comparison ~ a fellow indian student.
Based on what we see here, I had her in last place (of the three). If she had actually implemented something that identified missed exoplanets, that would have been interesting. Instead she identified possible places to look using already well constraints. I'm sure there is something we didn't see that accounts for the placement, but I felt bad for Ronak.
I mean, I relate to you kind of, but, if you have a machine then follow the text on the clothing and choose the option that it’s make for. You literally have the answer to how much and what to use for that specific clothing for you. The real struggle is when your mom has cut the info papers or the tag off of the clothing and you have to feel your way to find what material that is.
A E S T H E T I C nope I go to the school Ronak goes too and we have tonnnssss of science opportunities. He’s also on our robotics team, (I think he’s there in the national competition right now) and our team is in the top 10 in the nation I believe.
@@Andrew-ri5vs its still like sucks, I would have loved a robotic or arduino or something that would go beyond the school's curriculum to introduce me into this world. But alyast it too late
i had a cranky chemistry teacher that told me to read the book and would sit at the front of class and not do anything, but would get riled up about gun control, a physics teacher that didn't teach much either, i think they were just ready to retire.
I didn’t thought that such hypothesis can win award I thought the optical and the contamination project will win but the world wants to know if we can fit or is there a planet between the gaps of orbits.
I'm a junior in college and I know less than a fraction of what these high schoolers know, and I have done even less. This video is a great way to feel worthless.
Don't feel too bad, I have two engineering degrees and these kids made me feel bad too!!! They were impressive, but its important to remember that at one stage, they knew as little about their research as you did. So anyone can accomplish what they did, once you put your mind to it
I AM AN INDIAN. I was born in India and completed my undergrad from US from University of Houston, and I was always gravitated towards geniuses from the Indian community who were brushed aside for far too long for their funny accents or relationships with 7-11s. I am so happy to see that these accomplishments are now being noticed for their merits. I know that this generation of kids would rather identify them of being Americans, but somewhere deep inside, I am proud of them, and I am happy to be a part of the same community. I am also grateful to the USA and its people who have given an opportunity to so many immigrants to showcase their potential and break free of all the menial bickering that we often discuss on the internet. It is so surprising to watch videos coming out of US nowadays on the internet which are so divisive. Let me assure you that I found real friends and very close relationships while I was there.
I did -- or rather, it was wasted for me by going to schools ruined by bussing ignorant shitbags who disrupt the class and disrespect the environment, forcing everyone down to their stupidity. BUT, that's leftism for you! Make it fair by making everyone stupider! YAAAY
I bet the kid who made the eye testing thing could sell that to a phone company and make HUGE money. He's basically invented a lens that can magnify without moving mechanical parts, meaning optical zoom on smart phones would be 100% possible thanks to him.
I hear you! But being a genius isn't enough - you need drive, motivation, determination and a great support network to take your innate intellectual ability and thrive with it. I tested at a genius level in high school but I was directionless and poor, and look at me now - commenting on RUclips on a Saturday afternoon instead of being amazing, lol.
Congratulations! I felt I would like her to be the winner among those three, because her work was really science. Other's work were impressive as well but rather technology than science.
Both Asian kids had done much more useful work affecting common man's life ... But honestly level of thought n process went in to finding exo planners by a high school level student is really amazing. That's a scientist work Congratulations to all Really these r the kids who should rule this planet not politicians
Not really, I've participated in STS in high school, almost every student there has a mentor that did almost all the thinking for them. Sure, they put work into the project, but the originality almost always comes from some professor they emailed a few months prior.
So I guess the volcano model with baking soda and vinegar lost out.
yes..i did :(
From an overview of the candidates: "Carolyn Beaumont, 17, of Arlington, investigated how the quantity of added water affects the viscosity of magma, a key factor in the violence of volcanic eruptions, for her Regeneron Science Talent Search earth and planetary sciencesproject. Current infrared spectroscopy models suggest that the amount of water reacting with magma to make it runny ultimately levels off, leaving the magma’s polymer bonds stretched but intact. Using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Carolyn showed that the degree to which water breaks apart magma polymers actually rises in proportion to the total amount of water present."
@@Egregius i vomited magma TRYIING to read that
@@Egregius wtf ? This just sounds like what an undergraduate student would do not a highschool one. I'm pretty sure they got half of the work done by their teachers, parents, ...
damn i was rooting for that
Pfff. I would totally shatter the competition with my vinegar volcano.
Lol bro
Funny ha🤣🤣
I laughed out loud 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Best comment
*Doofenshmirtz entered the chat.*
The guy who invented the eyesight measuring device didn't need that money, he will be a millionaire in a few years anyway.
@@RubbittTheBruise BIG OPTICS!
Absolutely
@@aidanlevy2841 But he made it a lot cheaper.
true. Regardless of whether it was an original invention or not, I totally see that as a cheap alternative to medical equipment. If he hasn't patented it and founded a startup in two years or less, he is wasting time.
Good point. I thought he should have won, but his product is so obviously marketable he probably doesn't need the funding.
The first one was genius because of the polar fluid being charged, but the calculations that would have gone into the cosmology project is mind-blowingly complex and impressive.
Nah, the calculation for the 1st one is more complex. I mean you're dealing with 2 non-ideal fluids and you need to be precise as hell. That's some pretty advanced fluid mechanics. But it's likely that he found the relation between concavity/convexity and potential experimentally, and not theoretically. On the other hand, space girl just had to deal with a little bit of circular motion.
@@adi2711 Space Girl 😂
Okay, now that's a cool name.
The calculations are not complex, the idea is.
I had to pause the video after that first kid's innovation. I'm absolutely blown away. The solution was so simple, yet no one has ever thought of it.
I guess lots of people thought of that, but this guy actually got it done and working, which makes all the difference.
Most likely not the first to think about it, but remember there is a vertical monopoly in the eye world. Look up Luxottica. They not only own brands, and optometrist offices. They also own insurance companies as well. Bet they also own the locations that make the phoropters. No money for them if they find a cheaper way.
You're misinterpreting his work. People have thought of using liquid lenses for these applications for a number of years. In fact they are already being used in some ophthalmology and optometry clinics already.
I didn't even know that electricity had that kind of reaction with oil and water. I'm just a programmer lol
That technology has been around for a while. His implementation seems like a good idea, but using smartphones with such low resolution, I'm assuming (just from the footage) would give pretty inaccurate results. It's obviously just a prototype though. I'd like to have seen a comparison between his real prescription and the one the kid's machine came up with.
The first young man is brilliant. I hope to see his device in the future.
It's actually pretty basic when you think about it. I am surprised that this wasn't invented sooner.
The reason it is so impressive is helped through the simplicity of the idea. It should reduce costs in the future mainly due to the limited resources used and the basic concept.
@@somedudeok1451 That's how a lot of things are. They seem simple in hindsight and yet the fact is they weren't invented sooner.
It's similar to when people criticize abstract art for being something they themselves could easily make (ie white canvas paintings) except they fail to realize that it wasn't as obvious and simple as they think it was since they didn't even consider it until they saw the end result. Essentially, while coming up with novel ideas is NP hard, verifying them can often be done in polynomial time.
@@somedudeok1451 why make something when the ones we have work 100%
Good idea. I hope no one steals it from him.
My bet was on Ronak for a practical and elegant replacement for glass lenses
His invention was NOT the frikkin lense! It was even explained. His innovation is a device that can cheaply be 3d printed and doesn't need a 20ft room!
I’m upset I really wanted him to win. I knew him well in middle school and he goes to my high school right now. Great guy.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334
There are already a lot of devices, which doesn't need the 20ft room. So that wasn't his idea either. He combined cheap small parts with phone to make the device.
@@user255 He might not be the only one with such a device. But he has something with potential. Be negative all you like but I always applaud people who are creative, even if some parts seem "copied".
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334
Negative? No, I just pointed out why she was clear winner over his gadget.
The first guy. Period.
Alright, your here too! 🤦♀
I thought the same thing. I’m sure he will be going places with his device though.
Yeah his was ok, the girl was assuming way too much
@@uskeeze2131 his problem is that his doesn’t include stigmatism’s
The study that has practical applications to people in third word countries and poor people in general should have won. disappointing
We need that eye thing here in africa that kid is a Genius
Probably can be made for less than 50 dollars too; less if in larger scale production
But smartphone
sonicruled 1111 what smartphone
@@aimu_1111 people are throwing older ones away, they should not be expensive to obtain
@@aimu_1111 He is just using the smartphone for convenience, the software can go on a chip and all you need is one switch for input, I wouldn't be impressed if that system costs less than 3€ to make.
Respect to Derek for giving these kids a spotlight and empowering our youth. You rock man!
The guy with the glass idea if he continues his projects could make millions
Ain't no millions to be made in providing poor areas with an easy alternative to measure eye sight. This is the reason why so many things that are needed are not provided.
Charles Okonkwo you sir are completely ignorant to how supply and demand works. If he can mass produce his affordable invention in middle class areas with the pitch that every one purchased goes to someone who needs one and can’t afford it, everyone wins. Also, this idea isn’t even new, it’s already been done by successful people.
@@pahom2 so he's a bullshiter then.. I thought that kid made all that I was impressed until you told me.
@@pahom2 You're the 100th one that hasn't watched the video. The lense wasn't the invention, the Phoropter that can be 3d printed and doesn't need a 20ft room is!
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 I mean it was a tiny bit misleading. They did first explain the liquid lense and they never said that he did not make the components. But you should be able to tell by the quality of the lense compared to the 3d printed part.
I knew that girl would win. I couldn't understand 95% of what she talked about. The other two will probably make money off their inventions since there are practical everyday uses for them, especially the first dude.
Yeh I had no clue what she was talking about so i knew she'd win
It's basically finding places a planet could be hiding that we didn't think to look. Ingenious if you ask me.
what she said was actually quite simple
@@dennispremoli7950 Yeah but no one really thought about it. The adult scientists just thought that what we saw in our telescope are more than enough. She won precisely because of that. A very simple mathematical graph that no one even thought of. Now it will be used even in our own solar system to try to find out the other moons in the other planets.
@@imranq9241 it reminds me of the survivor bias, it’s really smart of her to think of such a counter intuitive solution to finding planets
Congratulations to Anna. Ronak Roy's invention will have more profound impact in underdeveloped countries. I wish he gets more attention.
Apparently his idea wasn't that novel: www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-14507-5#Fig1
Plus, this was not a peace price, but a science price. He used existing science to do engineering. She used existing science to innovate in the field of exoplanet research. If here innovation leads to the discovery of many new exoplanets then she may be nominated for a Nobel price in physics. She also obviously know far more about physics than he does if you compare their achievements, so she probably made a great interview.
Not to say that the boy's contribution wasn't impressive. But she is the kind of person that gives names to methods in astronomy. One day she may be remembered as a house hold name in astronomy.
It is strange to consider that in large swaths of our world it is easier to find a cell phone than an optometrist.
Aswani Sharma anna more like swine
i just dont get sense about the lense one, can you explain what is it ?
@@gilang4838 The current method using a variety of solid lenses, BUT his using basically in simple terms, a lens that changes from the manipulating of an electric current. As such he replaced a number of lenses with one lens. At least that how I understood it
If your ego ever grows out of control, just watch this video. This is seriously impressive though!
Thanks now I lost my ego, why even live
i watched it..it's still growing
@@craybassblong2349 🤣🤣
Me too
Yeah
💯% accurate sir
As a glass wearer, Number 1 won the moment you told me what his project is.
lol thought the same thing dude
Imagine losing your glasses and wandering around with that thing strapped to your face for a week
i have bad astigmatism, i don't think the machine can test/correct for that since it uses a liquid lens.
There are people working on smart glasses that utilize the "liquid lens" idea. I've also read about auto focusing contact lenses in the works.
If that diopter-test (vision test) has a accurate and consistent result, the guy would easily become a millionaire.
ZG Colorforce I hope he has applied for a patent.
He is on right track; right now his device is over-simplified, not taking into account many conditions/disease states, but I'm sure with time he will improve it. Getting a provisional patent is first step
Everyone talking about money, kinda sad.
@@TomGeorgin striving for success should is sad?
@@polygondeath2361 Implying that being rich is the only form of success is sad*
Here in India the students are under a lot of stress and pressure about getting into the top colleges that it kills all the creative desires that these people have build their project upon! It is a sad scenario but I hope things will change and we will also move ahead in Science!
True
I agree in fact I feel so
india is 20 years behind in education field
yeah man im stupid too
But we can put a little more effort to improve situation after watching this video my concept about study is completely changed now I want to be more innovative
_Veritasium beats MrBeast $100K RUclipsrs Battle Royale in a single video_
To be fair he did 2 rounds and gave away 200k
It's not his money.
both are sponsored to host, mostly.
and tbf, one is a bunch of youtubers playing a game, the other is science, science has a ton more money in it.
@@SuperExodian tbf, youtubers have more money then they should, when you consider the ignorance that is driving this world to its demise. We need more science and support for science, if we hope to have more generations living on this planet and elsewhere. F spoiled brats with money, and the degerates promoting that lifestyle.
umm mr beast had two winning teams so it was 200k prize money and the map and the gear costs more than 50k
the boy's solutions was brilliant
but it's more about engineering & innovation than about "scientific research"
@valy0f Not all innovation is scientific, but I'm just being pedantic. Either way, the point isn't that engineering is unscientific, it's that (at least according to Derek) the prize is specifically for research.
@valy0f Actually scientific research is about discovering new technologies and formulating new knowledge about the world where engineering is about how to take these ideas and discoveries and finding practical ways to use them. And of coarse there are scientists who are also engineers but the two tasks are fundamentally different and require completely different skill sets and entirely different ways of thinking. As an engineer myself I can tell you that they are very different but engineers still follow the scientific process in that we come up with different models or solutions and test them against the problem to see which works best and try and come up with solutions to better improve the next iteration based on the findings, etc. so yes engineering is scientific but it is not scientific research, that is a completely different field.
And yes you could argue that some engineers approach things less scientifically and use what you could call a shotgun approach and although this can be effective it can often lead you into trouble such as the hyperloop, or waterseer, or any of the other BS pseudoscience that keeps coming out that needs constant debunking.
There really should be a second field of science that specializes in debunking BS from other engineers as scientists have a rigid method they use to peer review their work and test their hypothesis and can be more resistant to logical fallacies but engineers are not so lucky and can easily fall victim to these logical fallacies if they aren't careful when trying to think of a solution.
True, and he will definitely win this prize if this is an enigneering competition.
Translational research is essential to the process.
@valy0f Engineering: where the noble, semi-skilled laborers execute the vision of those who think and dream. Hello, Oompa Loompas of science!
Alternate Title:
Telling you, you are useless without actually telling you
In fact I got tears thinking the uselessness of me in this world!
😢
O...u...c....h.... Hmmmm
As someone who watches only anime and is useless, can confirm :c
@@Zareen686 Why would your usefullness define your value as a human being?
Where can I invest in the eyesight measuring device?!?!?! That kid is about to become a billionaire!
Imagine glasses that adapt to your ever changing eyesight 🙊😯
Not so fast! There are engineering problems to be solved. The main one is calibration. Imagine trying to measure length with a rubber ruler, that you stretch to match the length being measured. After getting clear vision, how do you measure what refraction the lens is giving? This sort of thing tends to vary "with the phase of the moon" in addition to the voltage applied. There is also problems even getting the same curvature over the whole field of the lens. Gravity and temperature also have roles.
Phoropter could be made much smaller and lighter without this liquid technology. (I know, I made one for one eye only that you hold like a wand). There is also the problem of the algorithm to display the lenses in the proper order (to allow correct measurement of patient (without corruption due to patient's accommodation), and for measurement of astigmatism. I do not know if the student addressed this in his design. I would like to see his paper!
I think won't it be a little inaccurate considering the fact that it could be affected by the ambient temperature the resistivity of the material used for the wires and some errors in the calculation of voltage applied sense obviously theoretical varies from practical practices
billionaire? lol no... he just put his project out there for the world to see. Only a matter of time before some startup with millions to spend takes this up on their own.
you can actually improve that to the point where you don't need a user input, what a shame
As a science guy, I am questioning my existence after watching this video.
Same here dude...I was just proud to write my 1st publication as a 1st year grad student.
Are you a *inhale....
**DATA SCIENTIST?!*
Same
same here.
😵
$250,000? Well that should be enough to buy textbooks her first year of college with enough to maybe even buy lunch afterwards.
id say maybe 2 textbooks and a shake if your lucky
Yeah, but thats if she doesn't go to Starbucks before her first class
250k enough for paying one fourth of tuition fee
@@ashtonisvibin561 you should try buying second hand books. Or pdf's
I would love to know if there is a significant correlation between winners of some science contest like this and actually successful researchers. The projects were fascinating and they were punching way above their weight class, but I don't see that happening without an already wealthy, well educated family background and I'm not sure (in either direction) whether it translates into anything long term. I'd love to know!
of the three, I think Ana's was the only one that had a much lower business potential and much higher academic potential. As the assistant prof in caltech mentioned, it sounded real close to a thesis for post grad research..
The other two seemed more like they were applying existing tech to create new products, and thus didn't really have as much of a potential for further research.
hmm good point.
Scientists already knew the thing Ana said
And then according to your logic automobile was not a great invention as it was derived from steam engine made by James watt lololoololololool
@@secretunknown2782 well I’d say in these situations applications and executions matter. Sure the calculations for stable orbits and the theory about packed solar systems existed before but applying them in a novel way to extract more information from existing data is no small achievement in its own.
Otherwise the exact same argument could be made for the two other projects which was also great.
@@sandraviknander7898 but the function she came up with is just comparing how much mass can a planet have in certain orbits, I know they're just highschoolers but that's not that hard to do.
I was sure the glasses kid would win.
Maybe he should try pitching this on Shark tank
Here is a thing any invention now a days meant to improve the society isnt as important as an invention that is meant to advance the society. But both the girl with arsenic detector and guy with glasses would make tons on money then the girl who won first price will every do.
This is a prize for original research. The device Ronack invented is a novel and useful one, but it is not ground breaking research when compared to Ana Humphreys work.
She broke new ground in astronomy and may have significant impact on future research. She was the clear winner.
also it should be noted he did not invent the liquid lens, and there have been similar applications in the past. Just in case that was a factor you might have considered.
He said that there was an interview too before picking the winner
His and the other girl's invention was the most practical but Anna's was probably the most mathematically impressive.
Reality shows are scams
Science students in India are busy preparing for entrance exams and these foreign students are busy in making innovation! Huge difference
Just goes to show how out of touch our education system is.
Same here in Pakistan, Sucks !
Indian system is not that bad
At least not worst than American
In india you can do masters for less than 1k if you are smart enough to crack entrance
That opens up the lots of doors for poor kids
In america you need to get big loan just for clg fees
@@noobofnoob3591 Indian system is bad not in terms of money, But how it gives very little credit to the creativity and talent of students and its notorious for shoving unnecessary subject down students throat. I think anyone who spent significant time in any Indian education systems (with some exceptions) would know that the only thing matters in there is how well you can remember stuff, It doesn't matter if you actually understand it.
Don't even get me started on quotas, The dumbest thing in Indian education system.
@@wlockuz4467 yes surely indian education system is not best in the world or perfect in any sence
And yes quotas are the worst
But still its way better than American system for sure where most of the citizens can't have access to higher education at all.
And when you talk about highest standard universities like IITs you can see education is quality is brilliant there and cost is minimal
Its just you need to work very hard to get in there.
Kid from high school: gets 250k for a science project
Me: watches Rick and Morty all day while scratching the belly
Both are peak forms of human innovation
Me: watches Ricky and Morty all day and dreams of having a helper monkey to scratch my belly.
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty...
Buttscratcha ?
Me? Play video games all day :)
Wow, Anna in the audience asking a question about black holes literally had me tear up.. What a bright, young, passionate kid!
Dang. I just finished my senior capstone engineering project at one of the best engineering schools in the country and that project is less impressive than these high schoolers' projects.
it sure feels shitty when you know yourself capable of great things while not achieving full potential, that's why i think that keeping youth around, helps humble and inspire us, never late to do something you love
@@apacheglider Love that. They aren't the creating the future. They are creating the NOW.
Ditto.
@@andrewabraham7455 What was your capstone project? Currently in Mech eng. right now.
@@stop6578 I'm a mech. eng. as well! I can't say too much cause of confidentiality stuff, but essentially it was researching and testing of a rain simulation system for autonomous vehicle testing. Was actually an interesting project in theory but the result was certainly less impressive than these high schoolers' projects
OMG!!! I learned about optic geometry and celestial mechanics only in my first year undergraduate to see 3 of them pulling this much level of science for a high school. I am so amazed. Well done.
You know, sometimes I feel bad for American high school students. Do they teach you the multiplication table in your senior year?
@@atdfbttl15 oof
@@atdfbttl15I don't know don't ask me.
@@atdfbttl15 actually they teach it in 9th grade
The Glass guy is brilliant ! Some Billionaire should help him producing these machines
yeah, but just think if they got that mainstream eye doctors would be out of a job.
@@Kkakay77 Billionaires don't care about who goes out of business, it's all about making a profit.
Ain't no billions to be made in providing poor areas with an easier alternative to test eye sight. Don't count on billionaires to do what is needed.
I thought for sure the first guy was gonna win it. His was the easiest to understand and in my opinion has a bigger impact on the real world than the other two.
his project has a bunch of flaws namely calibration and temperature + pressure affecting the liquid lens; additionally the screen resolution is too low for accurate measurements… its good but not nearly as brilliant as anas work
@@juliand3565 But ana's work sounds just like gravitational fields. i mean she wrote the equation on the board and that was it. The way she explained it makes sense but it wasn't really like cutting edge. If she was the first person to come up with that then I guess she deserves more credit. But I feel like that's so generic that someone had to have already started exploring that. Wouldn't this be baked into the packed planet solar system hypothesis? If a solar system is to have as many planets as possible then of course that means they would have to be packed in such a distance to not throw off ones orbit/gravitational field otherwise they wouldn't be planets? Or maybe I'm just too dumb to get it which is probably the case
@@brimmed if that’s what you believe you didn’t understand the project ! her explanation was very simplified because theres more than 2 bodies in most systems and solving for more than 2 bodies is extremely difficult. in fact solving for 3 bodies alone is one of the more famous problems in physics ;)
No its not, she simply ripped off an existing research paper. At least that's what it sounds like based on this short presentation.
@@brimmed That's how they discovered Pluto and how they tried to discover "Planet X"... She really hasn't discovered anything new, so she doesn't serve it... Neither of the three deserves it actually, the first one isn't stable enough, the second one is a rip-off, the third one is something that already exists...
This video makes me feel incredibly useless
Hamy K exactly
Yeah i also feel same.
they are just the 1% its fine
You’re not alone 99.99999 also does. those kids have a gift and are very talented and I am very proud of them because they’re using their gift for a honorable goal which will benefit all of us
You're not useless at all. They all just work their craft. Find something you love and put in the dedication!
They're all winners in my book. Brilliant youth!
then your book must be the communist manifesto
@@craybassblong2349 hahahhahahahha
Communist detected on American soil, lethal force engaged
Before anyone says who should have won, we don't even know what the other students projects were.
yeah do you know where we can find out more about the competition and the entry-projects?
YEEAH
Like you cared before
My research in school is "how to remember things without understanding them for exams".
Haha true lmao
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 😂
My strategy was always to try and memorize as many equations as i can then just write them all down when i'm handed the test.. managed to get my BS using that OP strat. and some classes let us use graphing calculators. shout out TI for coming up with the TI Nspire letting me type notes on my calculator and putting images on it
Lmao 😂😂
@@brimmed wow that is so smart shaun, but yeah I hate schools just making me memorize without opening my interest in actually understanding them...
Thanks for promoting the Regeneron STS Derek! I was a semifinalist (top 300) in 2017 and though I obviously didn't win, it was such a fantastic experience to just get recognized for my research as a high school student (the money was pretty great too)! I wish I was a finalist just so that I could see all the brilliant research being done that year. Still doing science in college!
This video has made me question my life life decisions.
Right?!
I think the guy should have won that's some genius engineering
This is science, not engineering
Brett_Kendrick This is a prize for original research. The device Ronack invented is a novel and useful one, but it is not ground breaking research when compared to Ana Humphreys work.
She broke new ground in astronomy and may have significant impact on future research. She was the clear winner.
also it should be noted he did not invent the liquid lens, and there have been similar applications in the past. Just in case that was a factor you might have considered.
no kidding, that guy is real genius!
@@unlincecosmico6192 oh dear, engineering is a science!!! I think that she was ground-breaking thats why she won, she figured out an answer to a question that no one had answered
Yes; engineering, not science. This comment coming from an engineer.
They are obviously all good, but it's true she looks completely moved by what she's doing, so passionate, but also so straight to the point and sharp. Amazing work!
Thought the lense thing was much more useful than finding planets
(Doesn’t meant I disagree with their decision he’ll surely make plenty of cash off of his thing)
It might be much simpler, though.
I think they're more interested in finding the best student than the best invention.
I think there's a bias towards theoretical physics sice it's more useful for the scientific community
Aliens could use it to find pluto, thus proving pluto is a planet.
@Cosmic Rift It's better if it is though
@@thomaseboland8701 not already exists it was a work of his
Hey, you may not feel as smart as them, but youre here making an effort to learn. Good on you, have a nice day
thanks I needed that
What a comment. The amount of idiots on this smart video is mind blowing but god damn if this one is not the complete opposite
These kids are really smart. Excellent job to the winner! (No spoiler). They all will have bright future and a bright career.
Who would read comments before finishing and get mad about spoilers if you do you deserve to be spoiled.
@@billyosullivan4514 That is true :D
@@billyosullivan4514 too many people sadly
@@billyosullivan4514 I'm one of them
@@ammarbarbhaiwala9908 idiot
At first I also thought the eye guy would win.
But observe what happens when Ana is shown: Veritasium introduces Ana and cuts to a small segment on Kepler. He then cuts to her talking about the work she did, interlacing it with commentary on his own. She explains it clearly and tackles his questions with no flash and no fuss.
Basically a it suddenly feels like a normal Veritasium video. Now, ask yourself who the star of said video tends to be: some senior scientist or other.
These 3 young adults are brilliant. They're all winners in my opinion.
Hello beautiful
Not really, I've participated in STS in high school, almost every student there has a mentor that did almost all the thinking for them. Sure, the students put work into the project, but the originality almost always comes from some professor they emailed a few months prior.
@@justindie7543 Just sitting in a room and typing that it was all done with their professor or teachers help to demean their work. You are so smart Sir. If you can't do something for the world or nation or any community then it's better you don't give your opinions.
@@prashantsolanki007 Look, I'm no different. I did it too. I even won a small prize if that's anything to be proud of. I think the secret to making the world a better place is to know how the real world works, not to believe in some spoon fed fantasy. I think you should dwell on that.
@@justindie7543 To categorically state that "almost every student" had someone else doing the work for them is pretty demeaning, particularly to those that won the top prizes. I'm sure there were students that got help. But your original comment really comes off as sour grapes when we should be proud of these young people, and assuming the best about them. Honestly, I really rather wish you'd posted your own main comment, rather than tarnishing my praise for them.
I have a science degree...graduated with honors, and these high school students still blow my mind. Congrats to all of them.
@AJ I know what you mean. They want to do great things, and their hard work is not for a piece of paper. I feel the same; I didn't get a science degree just to have a piece of paper. I love science and my idols is Neil deGrasse Tyson and Carl Sagan. I'm just saying that even with my years of education, they are very special and still surpass me.
_So guys we did it, we got a quarter of a million dollars._
Unfunny
Or $250,000 and still growing
@@safir2241 unfunny when you don't know where the context is from
My guy Daniel is everywhere 🤣
stole this idea from my brain and im anrgy
And this is the difference between science and engineering.
Three super bright minds with great ideas! And randomly seeing Ana ask a question at the black hole press conference really proves how passionate she is!
It wasn't just any question. It was the best question in that entire QA session.
@@willis936 Just looked it up and it was a great question! Very well spoken, too.
Link please
@@TheRaven123 ruclips.net/video/lnJi0Jy692w/видео.html
The question in question is at 52:03 :)
Welcome To the guy didn't seem to answer her question fully though
That Indian kid is genius
We all know. Also *kids
Which one? 2 of them were Indian/indian decent.
Pretty sure they were all born and brought up in the US, which makes them... Americans.
American of Indian origin.
Yeah Prabhat like us :D
At 9:15 I ALSO WAS EXCITED!! she was so confident and as you stated the winner wasn't solely chosen for their work &that it would also require interviews and explanations. I knew she had it in the bag. Awesome!
When in highschool I spent about 6 hours/day, every day, for about three years, playing world of warcraft, vanilla and tbc. Guess I could have made crazy science projects instead.... But I could do them now! Got alot more resources today aswell! I'm gonna do it! Hell yeah!
Wait, what? WoW classic is coming out 27th of august!? OMFG!
😂
I feel so dumb after watching this.
Like, is anyone supposed to be that smart!?
nah, it's the extreme overachievers, she's not common, and there is nothing special about her abilities except for what she used them to do with it. she had a mutation or a very smart mother
Actually yes, most people are supposed to be that smart. We are all born with the capabilities, its up to you to make use of them. Ever hear of the term "Use it or lose it". Exercise your brain before it shrivels up.
@@sergeantseven4240 Lose*
@Jonnathan Crane And by that you're saying I'm lazy and not using my brain?
These students also all probably had help from teachers or even university professors. Like yes they're incredibly smart but they also probably had help
I mean, at a high level, when it's explained to me, I understand their projects and the science/math behind them. But I don't think I would ever have had the ingenuity or creativity to come up with these things myself. That's what I think separates these guys (and others of course) from the rest of us dumb dumbs. Hope they all get the recognition the rewards they deserve.
I went from "I understood how his project works" to "how is she going to find planets again?" To "what is she talking about?"
For the planet one, how I understood it is that there is space between planet’s orbits that could possibly fit another planet’s orbit that we haven’t discovered yet. For the arsenic water one, the machine basically turns arsenic from your water into a gas, so that the strip can detect it. After that, the strip darkens, and the darkens of your strip indicated how much arsenic is in the water. Ex: very light is very low arsenic, and very dark is a lot of arsenic.
I’m just a middle school student, so keep in mind I might be completely wrong about these explanations, but I did my best to explain them. (Also I’m replying to a comment from 2 years ago so I doubt the original commenter will see this)
Nice explanation Ur spot on although I'm not sure either but that's exactly what she meant by its like how many electrons fit in an orbit kinda of a thing, the Planet might be there because of the math but In real life it might not but it's more likely to be there, as she said the system is more likely to have the planet there because systems are more likely to be filled but at the end of the day it's a sort of theory I guess
Her mathematical model explains the maximum possible orbits for a planet between the two planets without actually disturbing the orbits of original planets. I also had trouble understanding it at first. I had to do a thought experiment to understand what she was talking about. I am still not sure if I understand it correctly.
@@technicalmaster4054 She was trying to find spots in that system that a body with the minimum mass of a planet could exist in whilst not disturbing the percieved orbits of the planets that passed in front of the sun during those four years. The only reason why there would probably be planets in any of the 250 something possible spots is if the planet packing hypothesis was correct. She was only finding areas that the theoretical small mass planets could be without being detected.
@@aaravshah8382 men the original comenter Maybe didnt read it but thank you i am more clear now
Holy crap!! These kids are geniuses. The research they've done is so amazing and can literally be life-changing. Congratulations to all the finalists and winner!!
Being geniuses, they will save the world tomorrow. Oh, hang on, they would have not to be imprisoned within specific areas of expertise to be able to do that, since the world includes everything. Oh well. On the other hand, if someones mind was a genius at lateral/horizontal thinking, and thus peered into ALL areas at the same time, one could at least understand not just the world, but the entire concept of reality itself at the base or foundation level. Such a person would be the first in the world to have done this. However, due to this person having shown to the world that he or she had no expertise in any specific category in today's world of science etc., the person at best will be categorized as being nothing but a jack of all trades, and a master of none. In turn, the smartest person in the world would be laughed at, and/or ignored. So much for saving the world then. Bummer !
9:27 that poor lady😂😂😂
F
That glass guy should contact Siemens immediately
Not to worry, I'm sure he has been contacted by many companies at this point.
I work for Siemens
I felt that only ronak's device is the most useful for a normal human in real life..
so her work was ground breaking, glasses guy was not original as hers. She was really knowledgeable as well, her knowledge of mathematics and physics also seemed superior as well. And her research was shown to senior researchers and teh fact that they said this was either a senior undergrad level, even postgrad level research is VERY telling!
@@ArunaKhudan Plenty of postgrad students whose big potential research turned out to be useless in the end. They are dime a dozen. Not crapping on her work though. But it needs a lot more work to be proven.
That's more the role of engineering. This is a science competition, so I think their choice was totally justified.
Plus, we don't have all that much information; we just saw a 2 minute interview with each contestant.
Yeah, I feel like CLEAN WATER is pretty useful.
@Fiend Herald wut? lmfao you liked your own deranged comment?
What was I doing in high school?😂
Indian system just trains us for exams.
OUR LIFE IS JUST AROUND JEE/NEET/UPSC. DONE!
so doesn't the american one, unless you have money, these kids in most cases either came from schools in neighborhoods with money or their parents were exceptional, I'm not taking from these kids, just that there would be a lot more if those factors were improved.
1st guy is the only inventor, he wins
True😔
@@Zimbob2424 you 're right mate
The first kid: *invents a way to measure eyesight
Government: I have a feeling this kid knows a bit too much...
He didn't invent it, he made it cheaper.
Klo he used the application of liquid lens in using them for that purpose
@@lordx4641 OP said that he invented a way to measure eyesight, implying that we didn't have a way to do that before.
Redesigned
@Wasee Rahman: What? That doesn't make any sense.
I kinda knew it, I rooted for the lenses kid to win but I knew that theoretical physics girl would win. that's like the cool trend nowadays.
Mohamed Salah Dimessi yeah
Very happy for her but I knew it'd be her all along and thought it was kinda unfair. The fact that I knew due to her topic being cool and not because of how meaningful and impactful it could be for human life proves that.
Yeah just compare the number of engineers that win Nobel prize to physics people. To be fair her work is probably more in line with the spirit of the competition in furthering scientific knowledge. On the other hand, the two engineers will probably have much greater immediate impacts on society (plus engineering pays better in terms of careers and entrepreneurship opportunities!)
@@InsaneSheepo it makes sense, theoretical physics needs funding because it does not pay off financially but in terms of future discoveries and better understanding of how our universe behave like it does.
Same
my public high school never promoted these level of thinking
Most schools don't though. :(
I was told by my 6th grade teacher who was amazing in all other respects said we would never be able image an actual atom or molecule.... but we can: photoionization microscopy and various methods of electron microscope.
I would have picked "Eyesight machine guy" for the prize.
That's because he ,you and me are indians 🥲
@@AfsalK he is American bro, he has an Indian origin though. Also the 3rd (Girl) also has an Indian Origin.
I would have choosen the girl, mass producing these devices is hard. Making a project is easy.
He only altered previously existing mechanisms. She did an analasis on a cosmological study that was incredibly complicated.
I think the winner deserved it. She went above and beyond what we know and her project is imo, noble.
Yep, I would have picked her too. No doubt. The other two were brilliant upcoming engineers, no question, but Anna seems to be already a genuine scientist. The way she talks, the way she thinks - that's more than just tinkering with electronics, that's some proper fundamental science there ;)
ok
Tinkering with electronics has progressed the world to its current state.
@@bldjln3158 😂💯
@@mystic3549 😂💯
@shravya bhandary Um
The first one was totally fantastic and new. But i was pretty much sure Ana was the winner. Astronomy is a very hard topic to go under, specially if you want to rethink the stuff that already exist.
We have found thousands of planets but what's the use then telling about it in science lecture?
Amit Kapse astronomy is our future, so her research is very useful
@@sayanorasonic hmm idk... we aren't gonna reach galaxies millions of light years away
@@sayanorasonic Astronomy is just timepass science.
I am eager to know how will your life change after finding planets 10 light years apart.Would be fun to know.
Don't get fooled by Physics and Space lobby of Earth.
True she is really cool I like her
Hope the other two (up to 39) received some kind of response from private companies, billionaires charity or universities.
They got 25k for doing something they enjoy. I think they won't run out of motivation anytime soon.
@@nal8503 good for them! Good for us!
It's highly likely that these kids are already being courted by science agencies or tech companies, or are already on their radar. Many of them are probably knowledgeable at a doctoral level, even though they're still in high school. Their futures are solid. It's the brighter-than-average kids in poor schools that need the encouragement.
I am pretty sure their futures are very bright indeed.
I wouldn't worry about them. While the winner starts doing research for NASA, those other two will be busy becoming millionaires with their patents.
As a senior myself, I find all of their inventions to be interesting and can’t imagine how the first and third brought it to life. But I knew she’d be te winner cause it’s literally equations and such a basic but unique approach, which none of the PhDs have already found out
The eye test guy gets my vote. :D
Edit: after seeing the winner, I can see why she won. Shes absolutely brilliant.
I thought it was going to be the eyetest guy as well, but I think the reason for that is that we didn't get a fully expanded explanation for Anna's work, which is why it felt a bit like she didn't initially take top spot in my ranking before the reveal.
Very true. Eye-test guy has several mechanical issues and difficulties he still hasn't solved. Amazing prototype, but might still need more work.
Ana, on the other hand, has produced a PAPER with a deceptively difficult algorithm that she programmed. Believe it or not, analyzing data like that (imagine the only data you get is flashes of light) is very hard.
Oh yeah I can definitively see why she won, as greasy creepy old man give her the big check, wink wink.
and also the other 2 while being smart would need a lot of funds from parents to make the prototypes its not like they did everything them self in designing it either
aryamanW, the girl win because her finding will make scientist save millions $$... plus it’s a quick « plug-n-play » innovation that demand no cost of production to get used. Yeah, money always rules, even over health !
Is there any way we could read Ana's research paper?
Not the whole paper but an abstract here, if you control F "Ana". You can also read all the other abstracts too! There's some dope stuff in here.
sspcdn.blob.core.windows.net/files/Documents/SEP/STS/2019/Regeneron%20STS%20Finalist%20Book%202019.pdf
This poster should suffice:
www.exoplanetscience2.org/sites/default/files/submission-attachments/humphreyanaexoplanetsii.pdf
Thanks people.
and trash it?
is it too advanced
still can't pay off student debts.
I shouldn't have but i laughed to this
Scientists and engineers have no problem paying off student debts. Purple lesbian quantum feminist dance theory specialists may have trouble finding relevant work.
@@pluto8404 Dude!!!! Oh my god, I rofled.
She won't have any student debt She will have a full ride somewhere.
@@kangarune Honestly, I think all finalists are likely to get full rides. And they should!
The eyesight guy and the filtration girl have a great future too, in my opinion they're all winners
No , the other two would be alcoholics , and i say this out of experience.
Since Vsauce is not making videos anymore, Veritasium is my No.1 science channel on RUclips right now
@walentaz you don't think Michael isn't humble?
Yeah Michael is the 🐐 GOAT, but he is having his first child, I don’t know how long until we see him again
CHECKOUT MARK ROBER
vsauce was a science channel?
@walentaz also vsauce kinda cheat with copycat stealing other people ideas, but present as they were the original creator. I lost interest watching them
>senior in high school
>playing Minecraft
>...
Yoo dude same
Second year university student here, I too play minecraft
why not farmville its so much more fun not that ive tried minecraft but i play matching with 3 on facebook while watching series.. and listen music on lower vollume to keep up the nervous systems' static things
Hah! I'm 40-mumble years old and I still play Minecraft :p
Ahahaha, I was thinking the same thing while watching the vid
The eye thing was better imo but congratz to her.
This is a prize for original research. The device Ronack invented is a novel and useful one, but it is not ground breaking research when compared to Ana Humphreys work.
She broke new ground in astronomy and may have significant impact on future research. She was the clear winner.
also it should be noted he did not invent the liquid lens, and there have been similar applications in the past. Just in case that was a factor you might have considered.
futbolita89742 get new material
Q R can u explain how come its groundbreaking her work is actually an hypothesis. Also he used the application of lenses in making that thing. Which is appreciable and is going to be beneficial in economic terms.
I agree, but astronomy research is like award bait for science contests.
after watching this, i just wonder: where did my curiosity and innovative thinking go?
Right into VTU
@@muhammudbinislam7843+1, VTU graduate here 😂😂
In our exams 😔
Science is in my blood. I waste 10 hours everyday watching science videos on RUclips.
Now a days, I began commenting too. Wasting 1 more hour. But Is it really wastage? ~~vsauce_music~~
Start doing science in addition to watching!!!
@@anubhavlive But what is wastage? *vsauce intensives*
you gotta remember though, a lot of us don't half the resources to make prototypes they do. For example, I never have had access to a 3d printer
@@SierraofTerra You can build a Creality CR10 single or dual nozzle clone now for around $150 - $200 if you do your webshopping right :)
the other kids idea was brilliant too, it might not have practical application like eye sight testing , and water quality testing but finding exoplanet without observing dip directly would have more direct impact for progressing science.
it's so much useful to Know how to predict(not even confirm) location of Exoplanets in distant systems right? My God!
This is what the RUclips algorithm should make viral.
Fun fact : I india science Olympiads are crowded like hell.
In US: Highschoolers don't even bother to register.
@Prakhar Chaturvedi True
That doesn't prove anything. The number of participants don't relate to the quality of the product.
That's the sad reality
But that's because of difference in the population.
Seriously bro! Just 2000 students?
These are much much less than that of a city!
I am very jealous from this comparison ~ a fellow indian student.
@Prakhar Chaturvedi SAD REALITY!
Okay so guys, remember the first kid with the phoropter, he actually made it into MIT, but I guess it was just expected after his mind blowing project
The third girl also went to MIT!
Based on what we see here, I had her in last place (of the three). If she had actually implemented something that identified missed exoplanets, that would have been interesting. Instead she identified possible places to look using already well constraints. I'm sure there is something we didn't see that accounts for the placement, but I felt bad for Ronak.
Meanwhile I struggle to do my laundry...
they struggle too don't worry, they are nerds but that tie a shoe lace without their mom
Jerry Rupprecht I feel you man
I mean, I relate to you kind of, but, if you have a machine then follow the text on the clothing and choose the option that it’s make for. You literally have the answer to how much and what to use for that specific clothing for you.
The real struggle is when your mom has cut the info papers or the tag off of the clothing and you have to feel your way to find what material that is.
Jerry Rupprecht, don't compare yourself to others, compare yourself to you.
I don't understand how are you guys comparing yourselves !! It inspires me so much and I am a high school student !
My school never had these programs or any interest in funding science subjects... Just lacrosse
... Archer? Is that you?
This isn’t based on your school. It’s an out of school thing.
A E S T H E T I C nope I go to the school Ronak goes too and we have tonnnssss of science opportunities. He’s also on our robotics team, (I think he’s there in the national competition right now) and our team is in the top 10 in the nation I believe.
@@Andrew-ri5vs its still like sucks, I would have loved a robotic or arduino or something that would go beyond the school's curriculum to introduce me into this world. But alyast it too late
i had a cranky chemistry teacher that told me to read the book and would sit at the front of class and not do anything, but would get riled up about gun control, a physics teacher that didn't teach much either, i think they were just ready to retire.
Please make a video on Fully explaining of the winning project
+1
Science says planets do a spiny around a bright thing because maths shows the odds we missed the spiny thing the first time we looked.
I didn’t thought that such hypothesis can win award I thought the optical and the contamination project will win but the world wants to know if we can fit or is there a planet between the gaps of orbits.
I mean the way these guys speak and conduct themselves is very humbling.
The 3rd girl's project was the most interesting, in my opinion, but they all did great.
@@jdeep7 It's 3D printed.
@@jes00456 no it was good but still that lacks
I could never even begin to even imagine myself creating any of these holy. Genius
I'm a junior in college and I know less than a fraction of what these high schoolers know, and I have done even less.
This video is a great way to feel worthless.
Don't feel too bad, I have two engineering degrees and these kids made me feel bad too!!! They were impressive, but its important to remember that at one stage, they knew as little about their research as you did. So anyone can accomplish what they did, once you put your mind to it
@Jakob S "1 dollar isn’t less than a dollar just because it’s in a sea of trillions of dollars."
Tell that to Zimbabwe.
I AM AN INDIAN.
I was born in India and completed my undergrad from US from University of Houston, and I was always gravitated towards geniuses from the Indian community who were brushed aside for far too long for their funny accents or relationships with 7-11s.
I am so happy to see that these accomplishments are now being noticed for their merits. I know that this generation of kids would rather identify them of being Americans, but somewhere deep inside, I am proud of them, and I am happy to be a part of the same community.
I am also grateful to the USA and its people who have given an opportunity to so many immigrants to showcase their potential and break free of all the menial bickering that we often discuss on the internet.
It is so surprising to watch videos coming out of US nowadays on the internet which are so divisive. Let me assure you that I found real friends and very close relationships while I was there.
Derek, you have the VERY BEST science channel. Thank you for the work you do putting your videos together, and teaching us.
Don't sleep on Mark Rober
@@jogadorjnc true enough; Mark and Derek are pretty much on par with each other.
Love that these students are achieving great things. Did I waste my high school years?
I did -- or rather, it was wasted for me by going to schools ruined by bussing ignorant shitbags who disrupt the class and disrespect the environment, forcing everyone down to their stupidity. BUT, that's leftism for you! Make it fair by making everyone stupider! YAAAY
a lens with electrically configurable parameters in such a tiny space... the first guy deserved to win....
if he had built it maybe but you can just buy a liquid lens off the internet
@@juliand3565 life is more imporatnat than spacei if u dont have eyesight how will u look and work (idiot!)
I bet the kid who made the eye testing thing could sell that to a phone company and make HUGE money.
He's basically invented a lens that can magnify without moving mechanical parts, meaning optical zoom on smart phones would be 100% possible thanks to him.
I feel so dumb now.
ALL of these kids are geniuses.
Think how far the world would have been, if these were your average teen-age kids..
I hear you! But being a genius isn't enough - you need drive, motivation, determination and a great support network to take your innate intellectual ability and thrive with it. I tested at a genius level in high school but I was directionless and poor, and look at me now - commenting on RUclips on a Saturday afternoon instead of being amazing, lol.
Kids are never geniuses.
@@y09i_ Did you even watch the video lmao
@@bosstowndynamics5488 truth
Congratulations! I felt I would like her to be the winner among those three, because her work was really science. Other's work were impressive as well but rather technology than science.
Technology is science.
@@chotatopips4177 its science and technology...
@@jackyjack9660 I’m sorry, I didn’t understand what you meant.
Both Asian kids had done much more useful work affecting common man's life ... But honestly level of thought n process went in to finding exo planners by a high school level student is really amazing. That's a scientist work
Congratulations to all
Really these r the kids who should rule this planet not politicians
Not really, I've participated in STS in high school, almost every student there has a mentor that did almost all the thinking for them. Sure, they put work into the project, but the originality almost always comes from some professor they emailed a few months prior.
They'd be eaten up alive in politics. You have to be a master liar, not in search of truth (veritasium.)
Both were indian right??
@@lordx4641 Yes, obviously.
@@justindie7543 Are you sure? Ana blew my mind away.
First guy. Easily Implementable. Huge Market. Amazing solution to widespread problem.