Amanda, the upwards rising earth makes the most sense to me as the best explanation to explain why objects 'appear' to fall. I just have a question as to what happens when an object is let go by the person holding it - Does it simply just float in place exactly where the person let it go, or does it keep some upwards momentum(not sure if this is the correct word) of the earths upwards motion for a while before coming to a stop?
When you’re holding the object, you, the object and earth all move together. So when you let it go the object will continue up but it begins to slow down. Losing momentum is the right word. Eventually the earth catches up to it and when it does the object is now on the ground, considered at rest, because it is back to the constant speed it was at when you were holding it. 😊
@@mandivvy Sorry for the late but thanks. That's what I figured would happen but I had a few people tell me I was wrong, so I was doubting myself a bit. Much appreciated👍
A model is just a description of some entity. It can be crude or as detailed as you want. You can use it to make predictions. I've just made a video of the globe model specifically with The Final Experiment in mind. 1. It predicts a 24 hour Sun in Antarctica in December while 24 hr night in the Arctic. 2. It shows why the Sun will located due North at Solar Noon and due South later in the day. 3. It predicts the angles to the Sun from Union Glacier, 13° to 33°. 4. It shows why we have Seasons. 5. It shows how the Sun seemingly moves between the tropics. I'm unable to make a FE model because there is no description of it that anyone can agree on. I've been on a little journey since I learned there FE was a thing around 2021. I've found the globe model works for everyone no matter where they are and I have not found any conflicts. For me it's all about the geometry. Everyone has their own journey to make I suppose. Just try and falsify every claim from either side and you'll be alright. Try Babbling Reality 😊
Thank you for your comment! Good luck on your journey discovering the nature of our reality. And thank you for the channel name suggestion. Much appreciated! 😊
@@Execrate200 Do you think that when the tree lets go of an apple that the apple will float in right there in space waiting for the Earth to rush up to meet it? We know that isn't true. Just because something can be described that way doesn't mean that's what is happening. If you sit on a train in a train station and the train next to you starts moving, you can also think of it as they're standing still and you're on the moving train. But we know that's not true, don't we.
@@Petey194 "Do you think that when the tree lets go of an apple that the apple will float in right there in space waiting for the Earth to rush up to meet it? We know that isn't true." Umm...How do you know that isn't true?? Please share.
The channel name should be "Never progress" or "Focus on drama" "Round in circles". "Truth is not marketable" "The truth existed before the word, that's why it can't be explained"
Hey Amanda, I agree with you, those who want to delete their channels because someone saw the 24h Sun can disappear from Level Earth discussions for good, good riddance is what I'd say. Secondly, it's hard to come up with names for other people, but Reality Babble sounds alright, I suppose, maybe Straight talks with Amanda or Shootin from the hip since you are from the South or No nonsense babble with Amanda, I don't know just throwing some ideas out there. Thanks for the videos, cheers.
if an accelerometer measures 1g when attached to the earth that means the earth is constantly increasing in velocity at a rate of 9.8 m/s^2. Over time we would reach incomprehensible speeds. How do you get beyond that? As for the final experiment it should really be called The Big Observation. Amanda Babbles 😂
You said it. It reads CONSTANT 1g. because its not accelerating as has been said many time, please pay attention. If it were constantly accelerating the measure of G would increase. so......
@@Execrate2001g is a unit of acceleration not velocity. You might be conflating the two. If the earth had a constant velocity but no acceleration then an accelerometer would read 0g while attached to the earth.
@@ralph1rodriguez acceleration is a change in either velocity or direction... there is obviously no change in velocity because our weight remains constant...
@@EarthshipBear a change in direction is angular motion which produces centripetal acceleration. Are you claiming the earth is turning? On one hand @Execrate200 is claiming the earth is not accelerating and on the other hand you're implying it is accelerating by changing direction. You guys are contradicting each other.
@ralph1rodriguez Thank you for your comment Ralph. I would say that the earth is moving at a constant. So, if it were speeding up the accelerometer would keep increasing. But it doesn’t. It stays constant. As far as the Final Experiment I completely agree with you. All it is is an observation. And I actually love the Amanda Babbles thing. 😊😂
I don't get what you saying about the objects falling? You think we are rising up to every falling object or are you saying obviously that isn't the case?
I’m saying there is no downward vector at all. Meaning that nothing is going down. The things you see that appear to be falling aren’t. Demonstrably. I know it can be difficult to accept. But take it slow and just consider all of the information I share. I’m not saying accept it. Just give it time and a real good look before you decide. 😊❤
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
it is not an experiment, it's an observation, it will not decide anything, and is definitely not a 'false dichotomy', as Will describes it!
You have a great approach to this material,
and a very pleasent manner presenting it.
TY.
Makes sense. Thanks.
Enjoy your content . Thankyou.
Thank you Emma and thank you for being here. ❤
They should be able to ride up front with the pilots to get their answers lol
Amanda, the upwards rising earth makes the most sense to me as the best explanation to explain why objects 'appear' to fall. I just have a question as to what happens when an object is let go by the person holding it - Does it simply just float in place exactly where the person let it go, or does it keep some upwards momentum(not sure if this is the correct word) of the earths upwards motion for a while before coming to a stop?
When you’re holding the object, you, the object and earth all move together. So when you let it go the object will continue up but it begins to slow down. Losing momentum is the right word. Eventually the earth catches up to it and when it does the object is now on the ground, considered at rest, because it is back to the constant speed it was at when you were holding it. 😊
@@mandivvy Sorry for the late but thanks. That's what I figured would happen but I had a few people tell me I was wrong, so I was doubting myself a bit. Much appreciated👍
@@SkemeKOS It’s no problem. I completely understand. And I second guess myself all the time. 😊
A model is just a description of some entity. It can be crude or as detailed as you want. You can use it to make predictions. I've just made a video of the globe model specifically with The Final Experiment in mind.
1. It predicts a 24 hour Sun in Antarctica in December while 24 hr night in the Arctic.
2. It shows why the Sun will located due North at Solar Noon and due South later in the day.
3. It predicts the angles to the Sun from Union Glacier, 13° to 33°.
4. It shows why we have Seasons.
5. It shows how the Sun seemingly moves between the tropics.
I'm unable to make a FE model because there is no description of it that anyone can agree on.
I've been on a little journey since I learned there FE was a thing around 2021. I've found the globe model works for everyone no matter where they are and I have not found any conflicts. For me it's all about the geometry. Everyone has their own journey to make I suppose. Just try and falsify every claim from either side and you'll be alright.
Try Babbling Reality 😊
Thank you for your comment! Good luck on your journey discovering the nature of our reality. And thank you for the channel name suggestion. Much appreciated! 😊
To me scripture describes pillars the earth doesn't move many scriptures. Flat doesn't move globe does. Scripture over fiction for me.
Make ya globe work with no quantified measure of
physical downward acceleration.
Game Over the final experiments been done already. :)
@@Execrate200 Do you think that when the tree lets go of an apple that the apple will float in right there in space waiting for the Earth to rush up to meet it? We know that isn't true. Just because something can be described that way doesn't mean that's what is happening. If you sit on a train in a train station and the train next to you starts moving, you can also think of it as they're standing still and you're on the moving train. But we know that's not true, don't we.
@@Petey194 "Do you think that when the tree lets go of an apple that the apple will float in right there in space waiting for the Earth to rush up to meet it? We know that isn't true."
Umm...How do you know that isn't true?? Please share.
The channel name should be "Never progress" or "Focus on drama" "Round in circles". "Truth is not marketable" "The truth existed before the word, that's why it can't be explained"
Reality Babble is good!
Hey Amanda, I agree with you, those who want to delete their channels because someone saw the 24h Sun can disappear from Level Earth discussions for good, good riddance is what I'd say. Secondly, it's hard to come up with names for other people, but Reality Babble sounds alright, I suppose, maybe Straight talks with Amanda or Shootin from the hip since you are from the South or No nonsense babble with Amanda, I don't know just throwing some ideas out there. Thanks for the videos, cheers.
Thanks Nach! And thanks for the name ideas. It’s hard to come up with something good that doesn’t sound ridiculous. Somebody said Amanda Babbles lol 😂
@@mandivvy Well, go with whatever you feel is right for you, all the best.
I dunno about you babbling, I could listen to you all day. But as a name, its pretty good. I don't find it cringey.
Such a sweet comment. Thank you.
if an accelerometer measures 1g when attached to the earth that means the earth is constantly increasing in velocity at a rate of 9.8 m/s^2. Over time we would reach incomprehensible speeds. How do you get beyond that?
As for the final experiment it should really be called The Big Observation.
Amanda Babbles 😂
You said it.
It reads CONSTANT 1g.
because its not accelerating as has been said many time, please pay attention.
If it were constantly accelerating the measure of G would increase.
so......
@@Execrate2001g is a unit of acceleration not velocity. You might be conflating the two. If the earth had a constant velocity but no acceleration then an accelerometer would read 0g while attached to the earth.
@@ralph1rodriguez acceleration is a change in either velocity or direction... there is obviously no change in velocity because our weight remains constant...
@@EarthshipBear a change in direction is angular motion which produces centripetal acceleration. Are you claiming the earth is turning? On one hand @Execrate200 is claiming the earth is not accelerating and on the other hand you're implying it is accelerating by changing direction. You guys are contradicting each other.
@ralph1rodriguez Thank you for your comment Ralph. I would say that the earth is moving at a constant. So, if it were speeding up the accelerometer would keep increasing. But it doesn’t. It stays constant. As far as the Final Experiment I completely agree with you. All it is is an observation. And I actually love the Amanda Babbles thing. 😊😂
I don't get what you saying about the objects falling? You think we are rising up to every falling object or are you saying obviously that isn't the case?
It is Demonstrably the objective physical case,,
sowwie.
Yes, we are rising up to the object. It is not falling, because there is demonstrably no movement(acceleration) taking place in the object.
I’m saying there is no downward vector at all. Meaning that nothing is going down. The things you see that appear to be falling aren’t. Demonstrably. I know it can be difficult to accept. But take it slow and just consider all of the information I share. I’m not saying accept it. Just give it time and a real good look before you decide. 😊❤
@@mandivvy well said 🔥
Channel name…
Rattle jaw reality ?