If they are going to introduce larger and easier to hit citadels, they need to fix the issues of AP full pens through superstructures first. Right now so many ships with hard to hit citadels also have massive superstructures that get absolutely crushed by AP full pens and HE spam. If you raised the citadels on these ships to be easier to hit, the ships might as well have no armor at all.
I know PQ isn't a history buff, but I am and this ships is special. Our family friend, J. McDonald was on the Tenn., Dec.7. He wasn't seriously injured and latter was AA gunnery officer aboard Essex. Obviously, I'm getting this ship. Seems like the Cit is to offset the slow speed, slow turrets, bad gun angles, especially taking what is a T6 ship into T10 game. And compared to Ipa, this is NOT an OP ship.
Just an FYI. I’m Tennessee born and raised. Several years ago I ran across the December 7th after action report for the Tennessee. I found it online. I’m assuming it’s still available somewhere.
@@naibu-tran mebbe, hard to know since I can't find any WG dimensions for Izumo. But Iowa's 828 ft long, 108 at the beam; meanwhile Tennessee's 600 (at waterline) and 97. So pretty short and stubby in comparison.
That Camo on the turrets had me initially thinking that GW had given it some Colorado turrets or something..... VERY glad to see it wasn't the case and they stuck to the 356s
Perhaps some rephrasing may be (in) order, but Wisconsin is a dockyard ship unlikely to come back for a looong time, if ever. Interestingly, Tennessee is even more accurate than her. According to shiptool, at 12km Tennessee's dispersion is ~30m tighter.
Wisconsin will still overmatch the bow of basically every cruiser in its MM spread. Not so with Tennessee, who can only overmatch most lower-tier cruisers and the superlights at same and higher tiers.
7:45 Nobody would play the damn thing if that was the case PQ. You would get devstruck from the other side of the map within the first 3 minutes, before you had even had a chance to position at all. The whole purpose of broadside armour, historically, was that ships were SUPPOSED to fight roughly broadside to each other.
Having an exposed citadel would be a nightmare. The lack of citadel is offset by being slow, weak to HE spam, and slow turrets. If you were punished to go broadside on it, Tennessee would suck.
PQ keep bragging about the punishment issue Meanwhile German BBs with gigantic Superstructures that take damage anyway so they don't wanted and don't need any silly punishment involved: "WTF, are you being serious??"
With more consistency on broadside's this game will lean more towards skilled and/or experienced players and that's exactly the opposite of what WG seems to want. I'm thinking they're making more money on newer players expanding their fleet than on the older players who are getting annoyed with Subs, CV's and powercreep.
i don’t think the HE needs to be nerfed, when this thing gets up tiered (and it will), the AP is going to be nigh useless against ANY ship that has 25 mm plating or more. so it needs something to fall back on, and with only 20.5 kts of speed, the conceal is warranted. considering how busted other designs are in this game (libertad, vincent, bungo, etc), this one is fine as is imo
huge citadel make everyone hide behind the island. that means more static games. broadside punishment soooooooooo hard, if you push, you dead. make everybody refuses to push.
28min sum up -Accurate -Lot of overmatch -Underwater citidal -Doesn't suffer 40s reload like Kansas... which is somehow balanced -Armor is nice -Default Murican sluggishness -AA is light and vulnerable... despite the stats suggest it's default US BB of the tier.
Not sure I would agree with ya on this one. Bring a NM into a tier 8 match is already tough. Decent guns, but, oh is she slow. I know as a tier 8 cruiser, if I see a NM, I am all in for burning her down. So, with a T8 NM basically, I think having a ship with no citadel and a decent burn chance vs T10 ships is a fair trade. Everything is faster than you when you are up tiered. So, whatever flank you choose to fight on, there is no retreat from it. If the HE is powerful, I think that would be fine because as one of the slowest ships around, everything will focus on you and try to farm some damage.
I really don't think so. People keep on bashing against subs and CV, but I have problems with those maybe one out of ten games tops. While I have full overpens salvo with BB on broadside cruisers almost every game. And to be fair, 50% of the sub players are not playing well enough to pass then 5 min mark. That said, double CV or 3+ subs game shouldn't be possible. But to me, having a sub and a cv in a game is not worse than having 4 or 5DDs in a game.
@@chenille28I can not agree with you more. Even though CV plane spotting(and hybrid plane spotting) sucks and is broken, I do believe overmatch is a much more common issue that we see in almost every game. Good take!
@@chenille28even if sub players are really bad, the fact that the class they’re playing is forgiving all the mistakes they make, that they are spotting you really easily and cancel any attempt to push, it’s really annoying. And even if in a game, a sub or CV is harassing me all the game and despite that, I still have a good score at the end, I will just have no fun in this game. And the Match Maker is tragic these days.. I have more and more blowouts. But overmatch can be anoying but I still manage to get good scores and games in cruisers with it
Regarding overmatch you are totaly right...frustrated to seeee how "i am punished for angling right". And no score on full broadside against enemy ships 3 salvo on row.
I don't want the game to become some angling simulator. I think how good a player plays comes down to how he knows his ship and what he can afford with it.
I came here after watching Trenlass video on it. PQ, I didn't watch your video yet, but as soon as I saw Trenlass video, I thought about you. XD And your video title looks promising. :3
I think less concealment and lower HE damage would be more than enough nerf to this ship. Its slow and with less concealment it would get punished alot more. Dont know that it needs to be citadeled easier that might be to much nerf, maybe a little easier ? 🤷
"Over 13 Thousand damage from one salvo into a Vincent" Good, eff that ship. No ship is gonna be considered "too much" while that napkin tardbarge remains un-nerfed.
Condirering that's essentially a slow T6 ship that's gonna encounter T10 ships, being more difficult to Citadel hit it a good thing, especially given the absolute crap ton of HE spammers at these high tier games... Having a good concealment is nearly nothing in High tiers because of CVs, Radars, Hybrid ships with planes, and submarines, even playing DD is a nightmare.
Theres no way this is gonna be OP, theyre 14 inch guns, it doesnt really matter how accurate they are. Pretty much anything at tier 8 or above can angle against it and be fine. Its a good design, as PQ is saying: if enemies fuck up, you get to punish them, but in return you have a lot of options against it. The ships that are actually OP are the ones where you dont get counterplay.
I just wish if we nerfed overmatch in some way/buffed CA armor we could give all BBs battlecruiser dispersion Battle cruisers cruiser dispersion and cruisers DD dispersion like the zao line. Probs will need an HE nerf to go with it but it would be a much more enjoyable AP experience IMO.
Vanguard kinda feels like the battleship PQ is describing. Accurate guns, but only 8. Limited overmatch ability, squishy, vulnerable citadel, but good speed and maneuverability. Good concealment, but not the best. It's pretty gimmick free to be honest.
Not being able to obliterate full broadside cruiser under 10km with an US BB has really made the Vermont a pain to use for me. I mean if a light cruiser is under 15km from me in a duel, I'm pretty much dead, because they have better DPM and also better alpha. I cannot count how many times I did 90% overpen on light or even heavy cruisers... Doing less that 10k if you put all 12 of your 427mm in a ship should not be possible.
Hmm... the shells are the same as NM, both for AP and HE. Why would the regular ship want to use AP if this uses HE? A miss is a miss after all, while a less accurate HE hit does more than a less accurate AP hit...
i wish Tennessee on Legends was this good. It's equal to the N. Mexico on the Tech tree, but the Kansas line. They split at New York and go to Nevada. Maybe if we get a Tennessee '44 like this 🤣🤣🤣🤣
So imagine fully broadsided Minotaur 9 km from your Vincent nicely parked on a beach. You shoot full salvo of AP and that should be a devstrike. But the game tells you no. No pens, overpens and ricochets. How? The problem with punishing broadside are long range ships. You are spotted by CV and suddenly there are flying shells from nowhere.
Hmmm, big cits and accurate guns... In my OP, that would just leave a ton of crossfire shots Somehow, this ship feels like a good balance In order to balance right, WG would need to take a good look at sigma, dispersion, pen value and RNG Make it less pen but good spread you get a great HE spamer
well we will see how good she is. New Mexico could use a sigma buff. 1.5 Sigma is too low. Arizona on the other hand is very strong thanks to a 1,8 Sigma California at Tier 7 is stil decent thanks to a 1.9 Sigma and better secondaries/AA I was surprised to see the Tennessee (Sister ship to the Caifornia) all the way up at Tier 8. As we all know Tier 8 ships are significantly stronger compared to Tier 7 ships. Not only do they get better armor but the firepower and the health is also higher. I am not sure if the Tennessee is strong enough
I don’t get WG, make a ship and leave it on sale to make money. But they are choosing to remove it from sale? I mean I get FOMO, but surely they would make more but leaving it up?
How about changeing overmatch in a way it increases the pen angle and remove to stupid "your armour isnt there" thingy? Edit: The ship feels like the little fat child of Rhode Island😂
So quick question, (although I'm starting to feel shadow banned on You-Tube for my nasty, little-man syndrome) about subs. So I was a player since the days of BETA. I was there for so much of the good-times. When Subs came out, I tried to like it, but I was tired of almost every other match pairing me up in games that seemed to have, Per side of course, 3-subs as well as a CV. I really tried to stick with it hoping for the best. Eventually after being relentless shot-gunned by a sub, or terrorized by a CV, I quit. I owned most of the premiums available then as well as I always had a premium account. I was tired of getting ignored by wargaming and tired of being mocked by other players. I miss this game. So...is it worth coming back to? Should I take a break from WT Naval for this? OR...is it still a monumental mess? Thank to anyone whom deems a response. Also thank to anyone for just reading my sad little question!
The game is still a monumental mess. Bugs galore and terrible MatchMaking because of the spaghetti coding. Sub shot-gunning has been nerfed as sub torps need 3km to arm. But WarGambling compensated subs by making subs turn radius even smaller. A good sub player can stay at 7-8km away and just J-turn away from ASW.
honestly doesnt seem much different from a ton of other tier 6-8 battleships... slow.. standard consumables, average pen, average armor, average HP pool, decent dispersion, decent AA
Yes but Slava is a real grind/slog to get. Being a Research Bureau ship, you gotta get 5 T10 ships to unlock the Research Bureau. Then re-set 4-6 ship lines and then grind/slog back to T10.
It’s always the same. The ship looks fantastic when it’s tested. It was the same with Petro and all the premium ships. But we get nerfed as soon as they are on the market and people buy it. What you see here is not the ship that you will buy.
I want a BIG nerf to all cruiser/destroyers. I play BB for most part, and I have been deleted in my Yamato aginst a cruiser. He simply hid in smoke (forever) and he HE spammed me to all my hp was gone. I could not move, and I could not see him....
Cruisers only "delete" BB's with really good torp spreads. Being HE spammed is "death by a thousand/million cuts". lol But, as a Cruiser/BB main, I'll even agree that HE spam is a problem. The HE spam problem starts with Cruiser AP though. Most Cruiser AP doesn't do much against BB's unless they're sub 10km (unless you're a Petro) and thickly armoured BB's like Kremlin are even worse to deal with. And at that sub 10km range, most Cruisers don't last long. So, what's their answer? Staying at long-range. And if they're at long-range, their only tool to use against BB's is HE. The next problem with HE spam is the raw damage fire does. Yes, fire damage is 100% heal-able, but a standard BB heal only recovers 1 fire worth of damage. The final problem is RNG. I've lost count the amount of times I've held my DCP for a double or even triple fire and the moment my DCP runs out, HE spammers get infinite luck and now I've got a permanent double or even triple fire.
@@ryanbrochu3336 Well, there you have it. I think that a destroyer/cruiser should have much less accuracy if they HE spam while they hide in SMOKE! I want sea battles on even terms....
Fat batolsheep - emphasis on FAT - but unlike the rest of the fattleships in that bracket, she can hit something? And not a paper ship with history behind the big ol' girl? I think I want this one.
Puerto Rico gets screwed with BB dispersion. Pretty dumb.
its balanced in that way, very good supercruiser
@@ReDiR20 nah. PR is mid as hell. Would love for her to get the slot 6 -11% disp module.
idk....i just dev struck 2 cruisers with PR in a match. Henry and Hindenburg....its kind of feat or famine ship
@@15Med3 PR is not a good ship. I straight up prefer Alaska (which, granted, is very strong, but still...).
yeah it needs a buff
If they are going to introduce larger and easier to hit citadels, they need to fix the issues of AP full pens through superstructures first. Right now so many ships with hard to hit citadels also have massive superstructures that get absolutely crushed by AP full pens and HE spam. If you raised the citadels on these ships to be easier to hit, the ships might as well have no armor at all.
The last thing this ship need is bigger citadel (above water). Because its already big slow pinata so it cant be too easy to destroy.
i feel that having french saturation on AoN-schemed ships would help with this.
I know PQ isn't a history buff, but I am and this ships is special. Our family friend, J. McDonald was on the Tenn., Dec.7. He wasn't seriously injured and latter was AA gunnery officer aboard Essex. Obviously, I'm getting this ship. Seems like the Cit is to offset the slow speed, slow turrets, bad gun angles, especially taking what is a T6 ship into T10 game. And compared to Ipa, this is NOT an OP ship.
Just an FYI. I’m Tennessee born and raised. Several years ago I ran across the December 7th after action report for the Tennessee. I found it online. I’m assuming it’s still available somewhere.
"It's a Vincent so I don't feel bad", thanks for the laugh
Funny thing is, bad dispersion can actually HELP players with bad aim.
all the more reason to remove overmatch and tighten dispersion.
16:37 That size comparison with Izumo is hilarious. Little baby Standard BB (I kid, I kid, I love those battlewagons).
i think it's about the perspective, the Tennessee is not that small compared to the Izumo
@@naibu-tran mebbe, hard to know since I can't find any WG dimensions for Izumo. But Iowa's 828 ft long, 108 at the beam; meanwhile Tennessee's 600 (at waterline) and 97. So pretty short and stubby in comparison.
Overmatch makes most "heavy" cruisers unplayable if you ask me... 9/10 ships people bring overmatches 30mm armor.
Really hope they give California some love. That one is just such a left behind child compared to WV44.
They did buff the reload by asmall amount.
It's tolerable since the buffs. Hardly a showstopper, but it's workable.
Should have been tier 8 from the start, along with WV44. They are both screwed by being stuck with 26mm plating
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." -The Dude.
That Camo on the turrets had me initially thinking that GW had given it some Colorado turrets or something..... VERY glad to see it wasn't the case and they stuck to the 356s
Was my 1st thought
aye matey
You say you wanted a ship like this but the Wisconsin already is in the game
Perhaps some rephrasing may be (in) order, but Wisconsin is a dockyard ship unlikely to come back for a looong time, if ever. Interestingly, Tennessee is even more accurate than her. According to shiptool, at 12km Tennessee's dispersion is ~30m tighter.
@@pdorn1yeah but Wisconsin have the access to the high-tier american aiming mod they are roughly the same tbh
Wisconsin will still overmatch the bow of basically every cruiser in its MM spread. Not so with Tennessee, who can only overmatch most lower-tier cruisers and the superlights at same and higher tiers.
As a WOWS Legends player I can confirm… Colbert, Stalingrad and Worcester have all 32mm Bows and Sterns 💀
7:45 Nobody would play the damn thing if that was the case PQ. You would get devstruck from the other side of the map within the first 3 minutes, before you had even had a chance to position at all.
The whole purpose of broadside armour, historically, was that ships were SUPPOSED to fight roughly broadside to each other.
This is a video game. The broadside armour should be whatever leads to the most well-balanced and enjoyable gameplay.
@@matsab7930 no.
Having an exposed citadel would be a nightmare. The lack of citadel is offset by being slow, weak to HE spam, and slow turrets. If you were punished to go broadside on it, Tennessee would suck.
Dispersion is everything
that's why the German AP DL line is feels so good
Colbert has 32mm everywhere and even Edinburgh has 30mm bow and stern
What? That's simply not true
PQ keep bragging about the punishment issue
Meanwhile German BBs with gigantic Superstructures that take damage anyway so they don't wanted and don't need any silly punishment involved: "WTF, are you being serious??"
With more consistency on broadside's this game will lean more towards skilled and/or experienced players and that's exactly the opposite of what WG seems to want. I'm thinking they're making more money on newer players expanding their fleet than on the older players who are getting annoyed with Subs, CV's and powercreep.
i don’t think the HE needs to be nerfed, when this thing gets up tiered (and it will), the AP is going to be nigh useless against ANY ship that has 25 mm plating or more. so it needs something to fall back on, and with only 20.5 kts of speed, the conceal is warranted. considering how busted other designs are in this game (libertad, vincent, bungo, etc), this one is fine as is imo
huge citadel make everyone hide behind the island. that means more static games. broadside punishment soooooooooo hard, if you push, you dead. make everybody refuses to push.
That one black gun per turret was messing with me; I'm like "is this another Colorado hull?"
It needs the below water citadel imo.
28min sum up
-Accurate
-Lot of overmatch
-Underwater citidal
-Doesn't suffer 40s reload like Kansas... which is somehow balanced
-Armor is nice
-Default Murican sluggishness
-AA is light and vulnerable... despite the stats suggest it's default US BB of the tier.
Not sure I would agree with ya on this one. Bring a NM into a tier 8 match is already tough. Decent guns, but, oh is she slow. I know as a tier 8 cruiser, if I see a NM, I am all in for burning her down. So, with a T8 NM basically, I think having a ship with no citadel and a decent burn chance vs T10 ships is a fair trade. Everything is faster than you when you are up tiered. So, whatever flank you choose to fight on, there is no retreat from it. If the HE is powerful, I think that would be fine because as one of the slowest ships around, everything will focus on you and try to farm some damage.
southern man don't need anyone around 😎
I think the sub/ CV issue and Match Maker is more important than overmatch these days
I really don't think so. People keep on bashing against subs and CV, but I have problems with those maybe one out of ten games tops. While I have full overpens salvo with BB on broadside cruisers almost every game.
And to be fair, 50% of the sub players are not playing well enough to pass then 5 min mark.
That said, double CV or 3+ subs game shouldn't be possible.
But to me, having a sub and a cv in a game is not worse than having 4 or 5DDs in a game.
@@chenille28I can not agree with you more. Even though CV plane spotting(and hybrid plane spotting) sucks and is broken, I do believe overmatch is a much more common issue that we see in almost every game. Good take!
@@chenille28even if sub players are really bad, the fact that the class they’re playing is forgiving all the mistakes they make, that they are spotting you really easily and cancel any attempt to push, it’s really annoying. And even if in a game, a sub or CV is harassing me all the game and despite that, I still have a good score at the end, I will just have no fun in this game. And the Match Maker is tragic these days.. I have more and more blowouts. But overmatch can be anoying but I still manage to get good scores and games in cruisers with it
This game has a battleship problem and WG aren't even trying to hide it
Love the addition of historical interesting ships!
I wish AA could be repaired
Regarding overmatch you are totaly right...frustrated to seeee how "i am punished for angling right". And no score on full broadside against enemy ships 3 salvo on row.
I don't want the game to become some angling simulator. I think how good a player plays comes down to how he knows his ship and what he can afford with it.
Love to see you try out the Indianapolis. Loving the consistent cruiser hunting experience!
I came here after watching Trenlass video on it. PQ, I didn't watch your video yet, but as soon as I saw Trenlass video, I thought about you. XD And your video title looks promising. :3
thx, good video. You ARE the most interesting BB player/streamer.
I think less concealment and lower HE damage would be more than enough nerf to this ship. Its slow and with less concealment it would get punished alot more. Dont know that it needs to be citadeled easier that might be to much nerf, maybe a little easier ? 🤷
Hopefully the campaign thing to obtain this ship is not very hard.
Let’s see a review of T5 Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya
Guns that reward your good aim and positioning are nice! Who would have thought!
That lemming move by your team in the first match is all too common today, sad.
They should just implement different dispersion for different shell types. That would fix a lot of issues, not only this ship.
"Over 13 Thousand damage from one salvo into a Vincent"
Good, eff that ship. No ship is gonna be considered "too much" while that napkin tardbarge remains un-nerfed.
Condirering that's essentially a slow T6 ship that's gonna encounter T10 ships, being more difficult to Citadel hit it a good thing, especially given the absolute crap ton of HE spammers at these high tier games...
Having a good concealment is nearly nothing in High tiers because of CVs, Radars, Hybrid ships with planes, and submarines, even playing DD is a nightmare.
I just may have to buy my first ship. Just because i live in Tennessee.
Kansas with NM guns with a cruiser dispersion?!
Boy if I can trade 3 ships for that. I'll getting that 😂
dat first broadside shot... stable like fkin formation flight in airshow.. op ship
Theres no way this is gonna be OP, theyre 14 inch guns, it doesnt really matter how accurate they are. Pretty much anything at tier 8 or above can angle against it and be fine. Its a good design, as PQ is saying: if enemies fuck up, you get to punish them, but in return you have a lot of options against it. The ships that are actually OP are the ones where you dont get counterplay.
I just wish if we nerfed overmatch in some way/buffed CA armor we could give all BBs battlecruiser dispersion Battle cruisers cruiser dispersion and cruisers DD dispersion like the zao line. Probs will need an HE nerf to go with it but it would be a much more enjoyable AP experience IMO.
You really don’t need a big citadel on this ship if you go broadside it will take hella damage from ap pens
Vanguard kinda feels like the battleship PQ is describing. Accurate guns, but only 8. Limited overmatch ability, squishy, vulnerable citadel, but good speed and maneuverability. Good concealment, but not the best. It's pretty gimmick free to be honest.
Not being able to obliterate full broadside cruiser under 10km with an US BB has really made the Vermont a pain to use for me.
I mean if a light cruiser is under 15km from me in a duel, I'm pretty much dead, because they have better DPM and also better alpha.
I cannot count how many times I did 90% overpen on light or even heavy cruisers...
Doing less that 10k if you put all 12 of your 427mm in a ship should not be possible.
Colbert with 32mm plating?! and here i am just wanting 25mm plating
... its a Vincent so dont feel bad !!! 😅😂😅... o7
Marseille is crying in the corner. This thing has better dispersion, better sigma AND ~20% better DPM, with other gun related stats being similar
you should try or give tsurugi more attention, it s the perfect bb to my mind
Oh boy, another realistic historical accuracy (Standard BB low citadek) versus the sake of arcade gameplay argument again...
Hmm... the shells are the same as NM, both for AP and HE.
Why would the regular ship want to use AP if this uses HE? A miss is a miss after all, while a less accurate HE hit does more than a less accurate AP hit...
i wish Tennessee on Legends was this good. It's equal to the N. Mexico on the Tech tree, but the Kansas line. They split at New York and go to Nevada. Maybe if we get a Tennessee '44 like this 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I’ve noticed the new crosshair you’ve started to use in your recent videos. Do you think the diagonal lines have been helping you at all?
I've been wanting this one. Badly.
My damned computer crashed last Monday morning, and still isn't fixed.
I hope I can get it fixed in time.
Isn't Tennesse just New Mexico Guns on a Colorado hull?
i dont want bow in cruisers to be invincible so either HE damage against cruisers should increase or overmatch should stay otherwise imo
Yep, campy Demoines are just as bad as subs without a way to dig them out.
More like a up tiered California but better is what some other people are saying about it.
So imagine fully broadsided Minotaur 9 km from your Vincent nicely parked on a beach. You shoot full salvo of AP and that should be a devstrike. But the game tells you no. No pens, overpens and ricochets. How? The problem with punishing broadside are long range ships. You are spotted by CV and suddenly there are flying shells from nowhere.
When does this start... what day can I pick up this ship for sale?
Tennessee played in the movie Alien Covenant
You sure picked this thing apart for it to be your dream BB...
so it has a lot of upsides, including insane dispersion and good reload for these guns. but where is the reloadbooster? :P isnt it missing something?
Secondary build Tennessee? You know you thought about it . . .
when is this ship coming out
At 6:50ish you said you won't get cits against Tenn. But you got cit at 1:13 that same game.
Most likely that campaign will be something ridiculous.
Hmmm, big cits and accurate guns...
In my OP, that would just leave a ton of crossfire shots
Somehow, this ship feels like a good balance
In order to balance right, WG would need to take a good look at sigma, dispersion, pen value and RNG
Make it less pen but good spread you get a great HE spamer
well we will see how good she is.
New Mexico could use a sigma buff. 1.5 Sigma is too low.
Arizona on the other hand is very strong thanks to a 1,8 Sigma
California at Tier 7 is stil decent thanks to a 1.9 Sigma and better secondaries/AA
I was surprised to see the Tennessee (Sister ship to the Caifornia) all the way up at Tier 8.
As we all know Tier 8 ships are significantly stronger compared to Tier 7 ships.
Not only do they get better armor but the firepower and the health is also higher.
I am not sure if the Tennessee is strong enough
You're the only Ten I See PQ
American Slava at tier 8 lol 🤣
ppl just use any subs to devstrike it with ease.
I will grind the event anyway because I want to get the Enterprise.
Ship request; Francesco Caracciolo WITHOUT accuracy mod :DDD
Why would anyone want to torture themselves with that? Caracciolo is already bad enough WITH Aim Mod.
Can I still get Tennessee?
It's so slow and like you said vulneable to HE spam so you're gonna get burned to the ground imagine dealing w that already and a high citadel 😂
Tennessee at T8?
I don’t get WG, make a ship and leave it on sale to make money. But they are choosing to remove it from sale? I mean I get FOMO, but surely they would make more but leaving it up?
Judging by the comments section it sounds like everyone in here is sailing around sideways out there, angling ain't hard gang
Is it in game yet?
You don't need to know the exact price to make a judgement call. It will cost almost as much as a AAA game which is as stupid as it sounds.
How about changeing overmatch in a way it increases the pen angle and remove to stupid "your armour isnt there" thingy?
Edit: The ship feels like the little fat child of Rhode Island😂
So quick question, (although I'm starting to feel shadow banned on You-Tube for my nasty, little-man syndrome) about subs. So I was a player since the days of BETA. I was there for so much of the good-times. When Subs came out, I tried to like it, but I was tired of almost every other match pairing me up in games that seemed to have, Per side of course, 3-subs as well as a CV. I really tried to stick with it hoping for the best. Eventually after being relentless shot-gunned by a sub, or terrorized by a CV, I quit. I owned most of the premiums available then as well as I always had a premium account. I was tired of getting ignored by wargaming and tired of being mocked by other players. I miss this game. So...is it worth coming back to? Should I take a break from WT Naval for this? OR...is it still a monumental mess? Thank to anyone whom deems a response. Also thank to anyone for just reading my sad little question!
The game is still a monumental mess. Bugs galore and terrible MatchMaking because of the spaghetti coding. Sub shot-gunning has been nerfed as sub torps need 3km to arm. But WarGambling compensated subs by making subs turn radius even smaller. A good sub player can stay at 7-8km away and just J-turn away from ASW.
Hey pq, how expensive do you think Enterprise is going to be?😂
honestly doesnt seem much different from a ton of other tier 6-8 battleships... slow.. standard consumables, average pen, average armor, average HP pool, decent dispersion, decent AA
was this RU wows?
Pq you should feel sorry to st. Vincent, they nerf that ship too much imo
?
Don't we have a similar experience with slava?
Yes but Slava is a real grind/slog to get. Being a Research Bureau ship, you gotta get 5 T10 ships to unlock the Research Bureau. Then re-set 4-6 ship lines and then grind/slog back to T10.
am i crazy or this ship has only 8 barrels but shoots 12 projectiles?
nvm i noticed the 1st barrel painted black
how long is the event duration?
From October 9 through November 27
Is it not possible to obtain Halsey ?
You get Halsey through the "Hit Hard! Hit Fast! Hit Often!" campaign.
It’s always the same. The ship looks fantastic when it’s tested. It was the same with Petro and all the premium ships. But we get nerfed as soon as they are on the market and people buy it.
What you see here is not the ship that you will buy.
why it have Califcornia Hull?
Because New Mexico, Colorado, California and Tennessee are all USN "standard BB" designs. Multiple classes designed around a common concept.
@@ryanbrochu3336 Ye i know that, What i am saying is the hull Number is same as California not tennesse
@@Em59x USN California is BB44, Tennessee is BB43. The hull numbers are correct.
@@ryanbrochu3336 they changed it thank god, thx for let me know
Quit with all your complaining Potato Man! It is so annoying. You just go on and on with your complaints.
Dont make it bigger then it is...its just a West Virginia 44. Just as bad.
I want a BIG nerf to all cruiser/destroyers. I play BB for most part, and I have been deleted in my Yamato aginst a cruiser. He simply hid in smoke (forever) and he HE spammed me to all my hp was gone. I could not move, and I could not see him....
Cruisers only "delete" BB's with really good torp spreads. Being HE spammed is "death by a thousand/million cuts". lol But, as a Cruiser/BB main, I'll even agree that HE spam is a problem. The HE spam problem starts with Cruiser AP though. Most Cruiser AP doesn't do much against BB's unless they're sub 10km (unless you're a Petro) and thickly armoured BB's like Kremlin are even worse to deal with. And at that sub 10km range, most Cruisers don't last long. So, what's their answer? Staying at long-range. And if they're at long-range, their only tool to use against BB's is HE. The next problem with HE spam is the raw damage fire does. Yes, fire damage is 100% heal-able, but a standard BB heal only recovers 1 fire worth of damage. The final problem is RNG. I've lost count the amount of times I've held my DCP for a double or even triple fire and the moment my DCP runs out, HE spammers get infinite luck and now I've got a permanent double or even triple fire.
@@ryanbrochu3336 Well, there you have it. I think that a destroyer/cruiser should have much less accuracy if they HE spam while they hide in SMOKE! I want sea battles on even terms....
Fat batolsheep - emphasis on FAT - but unlike the rest of the fattleships in that bracket, she can hit something? And not a paper ship with history behind the big ol' girl?
I think I want this one.
Guessing you Mean colorado right