Omg I thought the same thing, the minute she said her age, I was like, “wow… she looks incredible and is so well kept and proper.” She oozes richness. Lol
I cheaped out and it worked fine. granted I only rented a small uhaul and I only own like one 10x10' worth of space if that... But ti was cheap! and hey, I didn't damage my own shit.
So basically the person being paid as a mover's defense was "I'm a landscaper, not a mover" that was a really good one. I also loved how the judge asked the daughter what would happen if she had signed it
The plaintiff looks amazing for 65 years old to bad she wasn’t as wise by signing that contract with out thoroughly looking over that moving contract was a bad judgment on her part
I have always rented a truck and moved myself with help from family and friends. This last time I decided to go easy on myself and hire a moving company. Never again. It was awful. They forgot to wrap my dining room table. It was badly scratched and dinged. After 3 months of back and forth the person they sent to fix it only made it worse. I ended up telling him to leave my house. I did make sure I told everyone I know not to ever hire them.
I agree but moving is a very stressful experience. She did have all her evidence lined up nicely right down to the phone record of when he called her to cancel.
I totally agree about the comment that the Plaintiff doesn't look 65. Great for her. She looks like she is in her late 40's. Hats off to the Plaintiff. What ever she is doing or eating let me know. I will follow her Regerment to the T. Plus the Plaintiff's Daughter looks exactly like her mother.
I disagree with this verdict. At the end of the day, she hired a landscaper as a mover. Duh something is bound to go wrong. That’s like if I hired a mechanic to do my eye surgery. She should’ve hired professionals for her 2,500 sqft move.
And no it's not the same if you' I surgery. This is just hired manual labor people do their own moves all the time people do not do their own eye surgeries. And the reason why she got the money back is because the night entered $50 was for the Virginia move that was upcoming it wasn't for the move. That he did that wasn't extra move that she paid extra money for he was paid for that move. She just didn't want to continue using him for the next move and we could see why she's justified so he didn't earn that 950 yet.
So she hires landscapers instead of movers to move the contents of a 2200 sqft house, then signs a waiver four days before the move is even supposed to happen, then she’s shocked and appalled that it didn’t go smoothly. This is why I could never be a judge. I was the one deciding this case this woman would lose based solely on stupidity!
This part right here!! Plus, she was acting like he put her completely out of her way. She was storing, not moving so it's not like she lost a day of travel. I'm not saying that was acceptable buy, just like with her...stuff happens. She breeched the contract first by changing the date, reason why he lost use of the big truck & deposit. It sounds like she couldn't get out of the sale. Anyway, she had enough time to get professional movers, she just didn't want to pay for professional movers. I understand the $950 but the $200 was too much. That should have been checked under you get what you pay for.
Anyone can do a move people do their own moves all the time you're just hiring extra hands. You're really judgemental. I imagine your perfect and you don't make any silly mistakes.
Defendant is super good looking, as well as the plaintiff. I like the Defendant. I think he just does a side hustle. She knew it and wanted a cheap ass move.
He broke the written contract, she was the dummy hiring a landscaper to move her furniture. Can we say she wanted a cheap move after she sold her house. What brainless person doesn't pay for a legitimate moving company. I'm glad she received over $1000 back. You pay for what you get.
Pay attention she paid for the move he got to keep the money for the move. There were 2 moves. She got a refund for the paying for the second move in an advance that she can no longer trust him to show up for since he did not show. Up for the first move on the day he was supposed to..he was permitted to keep the first move money.... but she was refunded by judge verdict $950 for tge second move that she had prepaid... since it was clear he couldn't be relied upon to show up.
I hate cases like this. She tried to cheap out on a move, waited until the move was done, and then tried to nickel and dime all her money back. You don't get professional grade service for below grade cost. If she wants to gamble, that's her risk to take. Beyond that, she also lied about him misrepresenting himself (his first estimate clearly identified his profession). Finally, there were two contract breaks here. She broke the Virginia move contract (the $950) by indefinitely postponing it at the last minute. He broke the storage unit contract by showing up a day late. I don't see why his break justified returning the (much larger) money from her break. They were entirely different contracts. She should have gotten $200 back. No more.
I disagree. When you decide to sell a service you must deliver that service in a professional manner. This wasn't her neighbour's son who she gave $100 to and then decided to sue because he was clueless, this was a guy who tried to sell a professional service with contracts and money upfront. With regards to the contract breaking, he penalised her for her breach by making her pay $500 and signing a new one, however when he was too disorganised to turn up on the moving day, he shouldn't be penalised? He deserved every judgement against him, he oversold what he could deliver and was too greedy and arrogant to see that. Just because you're cheap, doesn't mean you can do a poor job.
@@JayTheDodo They were two different contracts. He didn't show up on the right day for the 2nd contract (the local move for $570). She canceled the first contract (the $950) at the last minute. He was at fault for the second breech. She was at fault for the first breech. He still performed the labor of the second contract, but did so in a way that it cost her $200 to get someone else to do it right. As such, breech of contract 1 ($950) should have stayed with him. Breech of contract two ($570) WOULD have gone to her if she hadn't let him do the labor the next day. Since she did, all she's entitled to is the cost of making it right (the $200). The judge even SAID that her reasoning for giving the plaintiff back the money from contract 1 was due to how badly he botched contract 2, and that isn't legal (think--if you get a lousy meal at a nice restaurant, you can get THAT meal comped. You don't get your money back from a previous reservation where you no-showed).
This case was the plantiffs fault lol she did not have to sign that paper stating everything went smoothly 4 days before the actual service she could have simply requested her money back and hired a real moving company but she wanted a cheap service, I also feel like he had her sign two different contracts under different company names so he can file taxes for both although it was one service smh he definitely need to stick to landscaping lol
I feel like did you watch the case question? Mark the $950 was for the second move of course. She's not going to trust him to show up the day of the moves since he didn't show up for the move the first move so he she. Paid him for the move both moves but she gets her money back on the second move because she canceled the second move because he wasn't reliable she. Never had To Do that second move.
Don’t hire someone who doesn’t have the knowledge. How is manual labor wether mowing the yard or moving a couch lol neither of those jobs requires any schooling or apprenticeship 😊
We once hired a "cheap" mover whose truck broke down before they got to us. They RENTED a truck and did the move. Although it was well after midnight before they were finished, this is a good example of someone who did WHATEVER IT TOOK to get the job done. Unlike the Defendant who couldn't be bothered to get a sitter.
The plaintiff is the typical cheap person who doesn't have the money to pay a professional and then complain later things were not the state of the art. 🤡
State? Of the. Art? Who's? Asking for state-of-the-art she was just asking him to show up and with appropriate equipment and To Do the job right he failed to show up on. The day he was supposed to and then came with inadequate truck... the $950 was for the second move she had for future... of course she wasn't going to trust him to show up for it since he flaked the first time and didn't even give her a call early in tge morning to warn her... left her waiting all day.. and postponing it to next day... still she agreed to allow him next day and pay him the $575 as agreed... but her prepay for second planned move for $950 she of course can't rely on him to show up day of tge move... so since he can't be relied upon he didn't earn the money for the second move..
@@panamafernandez4641LOL controlling because you want somebody to show up the day? They're supposed to move you and not weigh all day till 3:30 PM tell you that there are never going to show up that day yeah that's. Really? Controlling. I'm sure that you would be fine with that.
@just4now141 you should've reviewed the video to confirm. The Plaintiff clearly states AND presents the contract with the $950 deposit as the first one, where he states he's a landscaper. She was also trying to make a big deal that the contract for the SECOND move to storage stated he was a moving business, as if people can't start/have additional businesses. All I said was she should've been understanding just like in her situation, stuff happens & you have to adjust.
@just4now141 lol...Controlling because she was trying to take advantage of this guys lack of knowledge about moving costs to get a cheap move. Then instead of just being grateful that she got her stuff moved cheap, she wants to get her money back. Calling her controlling was nice. I could just call her the greedy, selfish, opportunist that she appears to be.
The plaintiff looks great for 65!!!! Unfortunately she thought she would save some money with this landscaper-mover. A VA hospital bus & a tiny $19.95 Haul van? That's ridiculous! Her money was spent the minute she gave it to him. 😮
From what I watched the plaintiff is empty headed. She hired a landscaper to move her furniture signed releasing him from liability before the actual move. Then still haven't checked to make sure if anything is broken before showing up to court. Had he had those receipts she would've lost the 950 also because she just pretty much said he can keep it when she gave him another payment for the second move instead of taking it from the 950. She breached the first time and Judge worked it out to blame him for breaching to the tenth power 🤷♀️ Her breach was still a breach. He basically moved her for free.
There was a new meeting of the minds and she paid extra money for it. I think you might be related to this person in the case on the defendant side. You've got some kind of special interest here.
Because it was the next day he didn't show up the 1st day remember. He didn't shop the 1st day and he told her and called her at 3:30 PM to tell her he couldn't show up 230 in. The storging it was the next day.
Moving companies do it all of the time. They know if they make you sign before delivery then they won't be responsible for any damage. It's super common for them to do this and hold your things hostage.
Judge it's not why would the defendant have her sign it. The question is why would the plaintiff sign it. When people see you're desperate they tend to get over.
All shows like this pay for the flights, accommodations and judgements of the litigants. Otherwise there would be no incentive of having your case on TV and being embarrassed.
THE NERVE OF THE DEFENDANT HE KNOW THAT HE OWES HER THE $$$. HE WAS TRYING TO FIND THE CHEAPEST WAY SO THAT HE COULD POCKET MORE. SMDH IT NEVER AMAZES ME HOW SCAMMERS FEEL SO ENTITLED. GLAD SHE RECIEVED THE OTHER $$$$ BK GOOD CALL
You think putting it caps makes it true. He was charging the absolute minimum. He ate the $950 in the rental of the big truck when she canceled the interstate move. She needed to bring down the shock & awe because NO ONE can make a 65 year old, high-pitched shrill-sounding, control freak do anything she doesn't want to. If he brought her a contract she didn't agree with then retain other services.
She hired him knowing he wasn't a mover and signed that ridiculous paper. She should be out the money. What happened to the judge's Spanish the cheap comes out expensive?
I can understand returning the $950. But the $200 to fix it right was the plaintiff's own call. She hired an amateur and got an amateur job. JM is taking this too personal as she puts herself in plaintiff's shoes to make such an unjust decision.
She would know if he broke anything because the Other Movers that Removed and Repacked her storage unit would have said...Hey...this was broke from the last mover...NOT US!
So you mean to tell me that she gave him $900 and he showed up with a $20 uhaul and a VA bus?? That's what was cheaper than getting two large uhauls???? Oh, he was really scamming 😅
The defendant answers don’t make sense even to himself
H00d
Thats What a lying clown looks like.
🤯🤣
She looks good to be 65!!!
MIIF
Daughter not too bad neither!!
Omg I thought the same thing, the minute she said her age, I was like, “wow… she looks incredible and is so well kept and proper.” She oozes richness. Lol
65 doesn’t look like it did 60 to 70 years ago! Better skin care products, etc.
And that's a fact. Gorgeous granny she is indeed 👌🏽
Another "The cheap comes out expensive" case by NOT vetting & hiring a professional bonded moving company
Never cheap out on movers unless you want headaches and court appearences.
i cheaped out on movers once, got a free set of left handed golf clubs
Going with the lowest bid is never good especially if you're moving out of state.
I cheaped out and it worked fine.
granted I only rented a small uhaul and I only own like one 10x10' worth of space if that... But ti was cheap! and hey, I didn't damage my own shit.
Right! That's the cheapest move I've ever heard of
I didnt cheap out on movers and still got azzr8ped by them. They’re a bunch of liars and crooks.
He was trying to make a little money on the side 😂
Don’t do business with black folk!!!
At least she had her evidence together
Thank goodness….I really liked her, so I was so happy she was well prepared.
So basically the person being paid as a mover's defense was "I'm a landscaper, not a mover" that was a really good one. I also loved how the judge asked the daughter what would happen if she had signed it
And the way the daughter looked at her mom😅
The plaintiff looks amazing for 65 years old to bad she wasn’t as wise by signing that contract with out thoroughly looking over that moving contract was a bad judgment on her part
*too
@@wileecoyote5749 this not proper grammar class sir
Have to agree with you there, looks much better than 90% of 45-65 year old actresses full of botox.
65 is not old. She should look good at 65. If people don’t do drugs/ drink excessively/etc…etc…they look how they should look.
@@shannysunshine8389 not to be rude but 65 is old your tripping lol
WHY IS THIS SHOW SO ADDICTINGGGG
Seriously, my lunch breaks might seem lame. They are not.
😂🤣🤣 yesss I found like 8 more episodes new! I thought I saw them ALL
@@virarodriguez7056sometimes I am not even watching but listening while I am working 😊
His business will fail, if this is any indication of how he does business. What a clown!!
So he’s a clown? Maybe poor business man
If he a clown she is too. Who signs a document before the work is complete
Thanks guys… lol… early mess ups learning curves and more… but my business is Thriving and well! lol.
The VA Bus was hysterical 😂 Poor guy. At least he’s trying
On the day of the move it wasn't that he had no babysitter, it was because the VA was using their bus.
Not entitled to use VA bus for this purpose.
Whew Chile! The Defendant is a "Janky Mover"🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
For sure!!😂
Who tf are you to say that lol @HTAnderson76
If you want to get your hustle going, do it with competency and integrity. Good ppl will refer you to good ppl.
well said!!
I have always rented a truck and moved myself with help from family and friends. This last time I decided to go easy on myself and hire a moving company. Never again. It was awful. They forgot to wrap my dining room table. It was badly scratched and dinged. After 3 months of back and forth the person they sent to fix it only made it worse. I ended up telling him to leave my house. I did make sure I told everyone I know not to ever hire them.
My Mom did it and brought the extra insurance and they low balled the claim in was a disaster.
She is old enough to know better.
Too damn old. Esp signing a paper that says she releases him from all liability b4 the ax even happened
I agree but moving is a very stressful experience. She did have all her evidence lined up nicely right down to the phone record of when he called her to cancel.
Don’t do business with black folk!!!
@@zenobiachapman1636 Don’t do business with black folk!!!
Plaintiff 65??? 😮 I wish I looked that good 😢
I totally agree about the comment that the Plaintiff doesn't look 65. Great for her. She looks like she is in her late 40's. Hats off to the Plaintiff. What ever she is doing or eating let me know. I will follow her Regerment to the T. Plus the Plaintiff's Daughter looks exactly like her mother.
Those are good genes. You can tell .
It's Genetics, BRO, SHE Does look amazing for her age,!!! 👍👍👍
Late 40s tho? Hell no. Too many wrinkles for late 40s..
It’s called botox
@QS0924 I swear u took the comment out my head..def not no late 40"s but she does look Great
I disagree with this verdict. At the end of the day, she hired a landscaper as a mover. Duh something is bound to go wrong. That’s like if I hired a mechanic to do my eye surgery. She should’ve hired professionals for her 2,500 sqft move.
And no it's not the same if you' I surgery. This is just hired manual labor people do their own moves all the time people do not do their own eye
surgeries.
And the reason why she got the money back is because the night entered $50 was for the Virginia move that was upcoming it wasn't for the move. That he did that wasn't extra move that she paid extra money for he was paid for that move. She just didn't want to continue using him for the next move and we could see why she's justified so he didn't earn that 950 yet.
Except he also had a moving company logo so he’s a liar all over the place.
Steve Martin sure looks different now. Must be the sun.😀
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
😅😅
I know the VA have no clue that the person responsible for this van is using it for personal reason reason
I loveeeee all her evidence! I know THATS rights she had everything
The defendant.....😂😅😂😅😂
Wouldn't hire him for anything. Not even trash removal
I wouldn't even hire him to do my landscaping,!!!!!
Exactly!!! He looks so lazy!
The whole thing seems strange. I reckon he had relations with her Daughter, and him and her Daughter met online.
@@nutindoin2why? What does this move have to do with his landscaping? Seems to be you’re a hater.
Maybe as a babysitter.
You get what you paid for!
I think he better stick to landscaping
Good point ☝️
He probably does a 💩 job at that too!
Don’t do business with black folk!!!
So she hires landscapers instead of movers to move the contents of a 2200 sqft house, then signs a waiver four days before the move is even supposed to happen, then she’s shocked and appalled that it didn’t go smoothly.
This is why I could never be a judge. I was the one deciding this case this woman would lose based solely on stupidity!
This part right here!! Plus, she was acting like he put her completely out of her way. She was storing, not moving so it's not like she lost a day of travel. I'm not saying that was acceptable buy, just like with her...stuff happens. She breeched the contract first by changing the date, reason why he lost use of the big truck & deposit. It sounds like she couldn't get out of the sale. Anyway, she had enough time to get professional movers, she just didn't want to pay for professional movers. I understand the $950 but the $200 was too much. That should have been checked under you get what you pay for.
Anyone can do a move people do their own moves all the time you're just hiring extra hands.
You're really judgemental. I imagine your perfect and you don't make any silly mistakes.
Defendant is super good looking, as well as the plaintiff. I like the Defendant. I think he just does a side hustle. She knew it and wanted a cheap ass move.
Whether she wanted or needed a cheap move is beyond the point. He did not show up the day he was supposed to he broke the contract.
65!!!! She looks damn good. I would said maybe 50. Wow!
Lol 50 isn't that much younger
@@Bebedollie That’s a whole 15 years which is quite a bit younger. If it’ll make you feel better I’ll say 45.🙄
50,65 same syht
@@wileecoyote5749 That’s just like saying 30 and 45 are the same thing but ok. Whatever makes you feel better🙄
Anyone else remember that movie The Jerk with Steve Martin?😂
The plaintiff is CRAZY, so many moving companies and she goes with this guy
She didn't take a photo of the bus. She took a photo of the security video from the storage place.
This guy is RIDICULOUS!!!
He broke the written contract, she was the dummy hiring a landscaper to move her furniture. Can we say she wanted a cheap move after she sold her house. What brainless person doesn't pay for a legitimate moving company. I'm glad she received over $1000 back. You pay for what you get.
She definitely wanted a cheap move.
She wanted a cheap move but that doesn’t make her brainless
The Plaintiff sure made everything more difficult.
Smart and very well prepped woman right there, I love it.
You get what you pay for!
The Plaintiff and her daughter are both stunningly beautiful
Her daughter is a copy and paste of her (plus melanin lol)
The daughter looks like a man!😂
He's probably a lousy landscaper too...he is super unprofessional. 🌾🌿🌱📦📦
Not Steve Martin😂😂😂
Right!!!!😂 Definitely not just gonna let that one slide 😂
From The Jerk! 😂
What a fool.
Was that Jane Fonda?
Jane is taller.
This was a hot mess. Stay in your business lane. lol
Anyone with the name Steve Martin I would think was a comedy routine
She looks… INCREDIBLE for 65, wow.
“It wasn’t midday. It was maybe 12:30…” Dude, what time do you think is midday?
65 looks good on the plaintiff!!!
This is her fault. She’s too old to be hiring a landscaper to do a move. Don’t try to act bourgeois now. You got your money’s worth.
Exactly
Pay attention she paid for the move he got to keep the money for the move.
There were 2 moves. She got a refund for the paying for the second move in an advance that she can no longer trust him to show up for since he did not show. Up for the first move on the day he was supposed to..he was permitted to keep the first move money.... but she was refunded by judge verdict $950 for tge second move that she had prepaid... since it was clear he couldn't be relied upon to show up.
The plaintiff kinda looks like Jane Fonda.
I see it 😄
Could be her sister 😆
Any woman of any age would take that as a sublime compliment 😊.
That’s why she looks so familiar!
Absolutely does😂
1. What a dead beat move. OMG!!! Everything he did was just ghetto shady.
2. Could she look ANY better for 65? Wow!
I hate cases like this. She tried to cheap out on a move, waited until the move was done, and then tried to nickel and dime all her money back. You don't get professional grade service for below grade cost. If she wants to gamble, that's her risk to take.
Beyond that, she also lied about him misrepresenting himself (his first estimate clearly identified his profession).
Finally, there were two contract breaks here. She broke the Virginia move contract (the $950) by indefinitely postponing it at the last minute. He broke the storage unit contract by showing up a day late. I don't see why his break justified returning the (much larger) money from her break. They were entirely different contracts. She should have gotten $200 back. No more.
Exactly!!
I disagree. When you decide to sell a service you must deliver that service in a professional manner. This wasn't her neighbour's son who she gave $100 to and then decided to sue because he was clueless, this was a guy who tried to sell a professional service with contracts and money upfront.
With regards to the contract breaking, he penalised her for her breach by making her pay $500 and signing a new one, however when he was too disorganised to turn up on the moving day, he shouldn't be penalised? He deserved every judgement against him, he oversold what he could deliver and was too greedy and arrogant to see that.
Just because you're cheap, doesn't mean you can do a poor job.
@@JayTheDodo They were two different contracts. He didn't show up on the right day for the 2nd contract (the local move for $570). She canceled the first contract (the $950) at the last minute. He was at fault for the second breech. She was at fault for the first breech. He still performed the labor of the second contract, but did so in a way that it cost her $200 to get someone else to do it right. As such, breech of contract 1 ($950) should have stayed with him. Breech of contract two ($570) WOULD have gone to her if she hadn't let him do the labor the next day. Since she did, all she's entitled to is the cost of making it right (the $200). The judge even SAID that her reasoning for giving the plaintiff back the money from contract 1 was due to how badly he botched contract 2, and that isn't legal (think--if you get a lousy meal at a nice restaurant, you can get THAT meal comped. You don't get your money back from a previous reservation where you no-showed).
I love this show.❤
This case was the plantiffs fault lol she did not have to sign that paper stating everything went smoothly 4 days before the actual service she could have simply requested her money back and hired a real moving company but she wanted a cheap service, I also feel like he had her sign two different contracts under different company names so he can file taxes for both although it was one service smh he definitely need to stick to landscaping lol
think the defendant has a few friends on here commenting LOL.
I feel like did you watch the case question? Mark the $950 was for the second move of course. She's not going to trust him to show up the day of the moves since he didn't show up for the move the first move so he she. Paid him for the move both moves but she gets her money back on the second move because she canceled the second move because he wasn't reliable she. Never had To Do that second move.
You could rent a couple of substantial moving trucks for 950 dollars.
But she’d have to load and unload the truck and do the driving.
If you have electric work that needs doing, dont hire a plumber!
Don’t hire someone who doesn’t have the knowledge. How is manual labor wether mowing the yard or moving a couch lol neither of those jobs requires any schooling or apprenticeship 😊
She didn't have to ask the poor woman her age. 🤦🏾♀️🤣
The plaintiff is pure beauty and is intelligent she is spot on she handled herself professionally and with grace
She is as clueless as clueless gets but he is as crooked as crooked gets.
We once hired a "cheap" mover whose truck broke down before they got to us. They RENTED a truck and did the move. Although it was well after midnight before they were finished, this is a good example of someone who did WHATEVER IT TOOK to get the job done. Unlike the Defendant who couldn't be bothered to get a sitter.
The plaintiff is the typical cheap person who doesn't have the money to pay a professional and then complain later things were not the state of the art. 🤡
Except she probably had the money & she had the wiggle room to find/hire movers. She was just being cheap & of course controlling.
State? Of the. Art? Who's? Asking for state-of-the-art she was just asking him to show up and with appropriate equipment and To Do the job right he failed to show up on. The day he was supposed to and then came with inadequate truck... the $950 was for the second move she had for future... of course she wasn't going to trust him to show up for it since he flaked the first time and didn't even give her a call early in tge morning to warn her... left her waiting all day.. and postponing it to next day... still she agreed to allow him next day and pay him the $575 as agreed... but her prepay for second planned move for $950 she of course can't rely on him to show up day of tge move... so since he can't be relied upon he didn't earn the money for the second move..
@@panamafernandez4641LOL controlling because you want somebody to show up the day? They're supposed to move you and not weigh all day till 3:30 PM tell you that there are never going to show up that day yeah that's. Really? Controlling. I'm sure that you would be fine with that.
@just4now141 you should've reviewed the video to confirm. The Plaintiff clearly states AND presents the contract with the $950 deposit as the first one, where he states he's a landscaper. She was also trying to make a big deal that the contract for the SECOND move to storage stated he was a moving business, as if people can't start/have additional businesses. All I said was she should've been understanding just like in her situation, stuff happens & you have to adjust.
@just4now141 lol...Controlling because she was trying to take advantage of this guys lack of knowledge about moving costs to get a cheap move. Then instead of just being grateful that she got her stuff moved cheap, she wants to get her money back. Calling her controlling was nice. I could just call her the greedy, selfish, opportunist that she appears to be.
I hope the VA fired that guy
The momma and the daughter fine as wine!
The lady falling asleep in the audience 😂😂😂
That’s the ploy of movers, you are usually presented with these additional expenses on the day of the move when you are trapped.
Correct decision was made!!
The plaintiff looks great for 65!!!! Unfortunately she thought she would save some money with this landscaper-mover. A VA hospital bus & a tiny $19.95 Haul van? That's ridiculous! Her money was spent the minute she gave it to him. 😮
Defendant operates exactly how he looks like he would operate. Shady af.
I wouldn't even let that guy do my landscaping
"I didn't MAKE her do anything." And that's how you know he's a crook.
From what I watched the plaintiff is empty headed. She hired a landscaper to move her furniture signed releasing him from liability before the actual move. Then still haven't checked to make sure if anything is broken before showing up to court. Had he had those receipts she would've lost the 950 also because she just pretty much said he can keep it when she gave him another payment for the second move instead of taking it from the 950. She breached the first time and Judge worked it out to blame him for breaching to the tenth power 🤷♀️ Her breach was still a breach. He basically moved her for free.
There was a new meeting of the minds and she paid extra money for it.
I think you might be related to this person in the case on the defendant side. You've got some kind of special interest here.
The defendant looked ill when he heard the judge’s decision. Maybe he already spent the money. 😳
Steve’s a wild and crazy guy if he thinks he can go from landscaper to mover
The cheap comes out expensive!
Lo barato sale caro¡
Man did the job with no damage reported and still has to pay..... wow
Wait, how did they first check in to the storage unit at 2:30, if she claims the movers didn't tell them until 3:30?
The next day.
The next day. Pay attention
Because it was the next day he didn't show up the 1st day remember. He didn't shop the 1st day and he told her and called her at 3:30 PM to tell her he couldn't show up 230 in. The storging it was the next day.
Really!
The defendant is a hustler.
The woman Harvey was talking to outside looks like Maya Rudolph!
Moving companies do it all of the time. They know if they make you sign before delivery then they won't be responsible for any damage. It's super common for them to do this and hold your things hostage.
Steve Martin? 😂 The defendant stacked her belongings the way he would stack his belongings.
Judge it's not why would the defendant have her sign it. The question is why would the plaintiff sign it. When people see you're desperate they tend to get over.
defendant is a scammer, he knew her back was against the wall. its so sad . However, justice was served!
This was the right verdict except she was too nice on the scammy defendant.
Doug is funny af 😂
Beauty fades, stupid is forever.
She’ll probably never see that judgement. He looks like the type who doesn’t pay his bills.
All shows like this pay for the flights, accommodations and judgements of the litigants. Otherwise there would be no incentive of having your case on TV and being embarrassed.
"It wasn't midday... it was like 12:30/1 o'clock..." 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I caught that too 😅😅
Wow. Steve Martin has some amazing acting range.
THE NERVE OF THE DEFENDANT HE KNOW THAT HE OWES HER THE $$$. HE WAS TRYING TO FIND THE CHEAPEST WAY SO THAT HE COULD POCKET MORE. SMDH IT NEVER AMAZES ME HOW SCAMMERS FEEL SO ENTITLED. GLAD SHE RECIEVED THE OTHER $$$$ BK GOOD CALL
But why are you yelling at us? 😅
You think putting it caps makes it true. He was charging the absolute minimum. He ate the $950 in the rental of the big truck when she canceled the interstate move. She needed to bring down the shock & awe because NO ONE can make a 65 year old, high-pitched shrill-sounding, control freak do anything she doesn't want to. If he brought her a contract she didn't agree with then retain other services.
I was raised by fathering Air Force. We moved several times then I joined Army.
He look like he don't have a clue about moving someone, he just wanted to make some, what he thought was some easy money.
This is what happens when you go cheap. Peace of mind is worth a few grand.
This is egregious. I totally agree with this outcome!
I've never seen a 65 year old woman look so good. Usually they have white hair and use a scooter.
She hired him knowing he wasn't a mover and signed that ridiculous paper. She should be out the money. What happened to the judge's Spanish the cheap comes out expensive?
Doug called the Plaintiff by the Defendant’s last name… 13:24 Why didn’t she correct him? 😅
He's playing stupid, he's not a mover and he wanted to protect himself and he did it
I can understand returning the $950. But the $200 to fix it right was the plaintiff's own call. She hired an amateur and got an amateur job. JM is taking this too personal as she puts herself in plaintiff's shoes to make such an unjust decision.
I think the defendant has a few friends on here commenting LOL.
She would know if he broke anything because the Other Movers that Removed and Repacked her storage unit would have said...Hey...this was broke from the last mover...NOT US!
If you're going to hire someone yo move you you want someone that does it full time.
Doug called her "Ms Martin" when she walked out of the courtroom. That was the defendant's last name.
So you mean to tell me that she gave him $900 and he showed up with a $20 uhaul and a VA bus?? That's what was cheaper than getting two large uhauls???? Oh, he was really scamming 😅
The plaintiff's daughter's hair is gorgeous