Mathis, you're officially one of my childhood channels.... I remember watching you about 3-ish years ago on my iPad and dreaming about the CVR... Stay strong💪🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥
@@BigMathisDoes besiege have any water physics? I’ve been watching you for a while, and have always wondered if plane crashes in water would be possible.
exactly what i wanted to ask, can we get like no verse besiege emergency landings on water? i heard the new DLC- ish i think is a very realistic simulation of water emergency landings
For the creator of video asking if 2 c5 galaxy fused this would happen If two **Lockheed C-5 Galaxy** cargo planes were somehow fused into one, the resulting structure would face numerous engineering and aerodynamic challenges. Here's a breakdown of what could happen: ### 1. **Structural Integrity** - **Physical Strain**: The C-5 is a large, complex aircraft, and fusing two of them together would place immense stress on both the airframe and its supporting structures. Each plane is designed to withstand specific forces during flight, and combining them could compromise the structural integrity of both aircraft, potentially causing failure in certain sections. - **Weight Distribution**: The weight of the combined planes would be distributed in a way that was never intended in the design. The fuselage would likely sag or buckle under its own weight, especially in the midsection where the two planes meet. This could cause a catastrophic failure during flight. ### 2. **Aerodynamics** - **Drag and Lift**: Aircraft are designed with specific aerodynamic profiles to minimize drag and optimize lift. Fusing two planes together would disrupt the smooth flow of air over the wings and fuselage, creating enormous drag and turbulence. The plane would likely experience extreme instability and be nearly impossible to fly in a controlled manner. - **Center of Gravity**: The center of gravity would likely shift significantly, making the aircraft extremely difficult to control. The aircraft might tend to pitch nose-down or nose-up, and the fuselage might exhibit severe yawing motions. This would be dangerous and could prevent the aircraft from maintaining stable flight. ### 3. **Flight Control** - **Control Surfaces**: The control surfaces (e.g., ailerons, elevators, rudders) on each aircraft are designed to work within specific parameters. Having two sets of control surfaces on a single plane could lead to conflicting aerodynamic forces, which would make the aircraft impossible to steer or maneuver effectively. In addition, the aircraft's control systems would need to be significantly modified to account for the new size and configuration. - **Engine Power**: The C-5 has four turbofan engines, and while each engine is powerful, two planes fused together would require more thrust to maintain stable flight. This could lead to engine overload or power mismatches that would prevent the aircraft from achieving proper flight speeds or maintaining altitude. ### 4. **Operational Impact** - **Flight Path**: Given the combined size of two C-5s, the plane would be extremely large, and the resulting size could limit its ability to take off from shorter runways or navigate within controlled airspace. Airports and air traffic control systems would not be designed to accommodate such a large aircraft. - **Cargo Handling**: The C-5 is primarily a cargo aircraft, and a fused version would likely lose much of its cargo handling capability, as the interior space would be too unwieldy. The combination of two massive fuselages would also interfere with the aircraft's ability to load or unload cargo efficiently. ### 5. **Hypothetical Outcomes** - If somehow, through advanced and highly speculative technology, the two planes could be fused together while maintaining their structural integrity, it would likely be a *disaster* in terms of flight performance. It would not be practical, nor would it be safe to operate. - The resulting structure might look like an enormous "double-barrel" airplane with twin sets of wings and engines, but it would likely be unstable, slow, and nearly impossible to fly or maneuver. ### Conclusion In reality, fusing two C-5 Galaxies into one plane would create an unmanageable, uncontrollable, and impractical aircraft. It would not be capable of flight under normal circumstances, and the forces and stresses involved would likely cause it to fail in the air. While it's an interesting thought experiment, such a plane would be a failure from both an engineering and an operational standpoint.
@@choophineas6821 twas chatGPT, but yeah lol You can tell it was chatGPT, because when he mentions engines, there is very clearly additional engines added in the thumbnail, but he says there is 4. That's because ChatGPT doens't know the thumbnail lol. Clout seeking idiot the OP is honestly.
Dude, i completely forgot about these videos. lol i remember one with this huge war with a10s, it's awesome you still do these. Thanks for being a childhood favorite on youtube
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Hey guys. What do you think of the two C-5 Galaxy's I've fused together to one airplane?
It looks weird and interesting
Omg is you❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😂😂😂😂😂
Make more realistic mid air collisions
Looked like the stratolauncher. Very nice you should destroy it more in future vids!
Yes pls
Mathis, you're officially one of my childhood channels....
I remember watching you about 3-ish years ago on my iPad and dreaming about the CVR...
Stay strong💪🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥
Thank you good sir
@@BigMathisDoes besiege have any water physics? I’ve been watching you for a while, and have always wondered if plane crashes in water would be possible.
exactly what i wanted to ask, can we get like no verse besiege emergency landings on water? i heard the new DLC- ish i think is a very realistic simulation of water emergency landings
@@El_Italo_Venezolanothere is
I love how the flaps and slats are deployed last minute, really adds a lot of detail and realism
5:01 Both owner: start! This plane: ok im ready. This jet: alright im going destory you 😂
0:39 Japan airlines 123 good ending😊
1:10 911 Keystar Flight 63 reference, same plane, same tail color, and if you notice the time is 1:10 which makes it the 110 freeway🤯
I want a plane crashes in realistic water series
Agreed
W e t
Yes
For the creator of video asking if 2 c5 galaxy fused this would happen
If two **Lockheed C-5 Galaxy** cargo planes were somehow fused into one, the resulting structure would face numerous engineering and aerodynamic challenges. Here's a breakdown of what could happen:
### 1. **Structural Integrity**
- **Physical Strain**: The C-5 is a large, complex aircraft, and fusing two of them together would place immense stress on both the airframe and its supporting structures. Each plane is designed to withstand specific forces during flight, and combining them could compromise the structural integrity of both aircraft, potentially causing failure in certain sections.
- **Weight Distribution**: The weight of the combined planes would be distributed in a way that was never intended in the design. The fuselage would likely sag or buckle under its own weight, especially in the midsection where the two planes meet. This could cause a catastrophic failure during flight.
### 2. **Aerodynamics**
- **Drag and Lift**: Aircraft are designed with specific aerodynamic profiles to minimize drag and optimize lift. Fusing two planes together would disrupt the smooth flow of air over the wings and fuselage, creating enormous drag and turbulence. The plane would likely experience extreme instability and be nearly impossible to fly in a controlled manner.
- **Center of Gravity**: The center of gravity would likely shift significantly, making the aircraft extremely difficult to control. The aircraft might tend to pitch nose-down or nose-up, and the fuselage might exhibit severe yawing motions. This would be dangerous and could prevent the aircraft from maintaining stable flight.
### 3. **Flight Control**
- **Control Surfaces**: The control surfaces (e.g., ailerons, elevators, rudders) on each aircraft are designed to work within specific parameters. Having two sets of control surfaces on a single plane could lead to conflicting aerodynamic forces, which would make the aircraft impossible to steer or maneuver effectively. In addition, the aircraft's control systems would need to be significantly modified to account for the new size and configuration.
- **Engine Power**: The C-5 has four turbofan engines, and while each engine is powerful, two planes fused together would require more thrust to maintain stable flight. This could lead to engine overload or power mismatches that would prevent the aircraft from achieving proper flight speeds or maintaining altitude.
### 4. **Operational Impact**
- **Flight Path**: Given the combined size of two C-5s, the plane would be extremely large, and the resulting size could limit its ability to take off from shorter runways or navigate within controlled airspace. Airports and air traffic control systems would not be designed to accommodate such a large aircraft.
- **Cargo Handling**: The C-5 is primarily a cargo aircraft, and a fused version would likely lose much of its cargo handling capability, as the interior space would be too unwieldy. The combination of two massive fuselages would also interfere with the aircraft's ability to load or unload cargo efficiently.
### 5. **Hypothetical Outcomes**
- If somehow, through advanced and highly speculative technology, the two planes could be fused together while maintaining their structural integrity, it would likely be a *disaster* in terms of flight performance. It would not be practical, nor would it be safe to operate.
- The resulting structure might look like an enormous "double-barrel" airplane with twin sets of wings and engines, but it would likely be unstable, slow, and nearly impossible to fly or maneuver.
### Conclusion
In reality, fusing two C-5 Galaxies into one plane would create an unmanageable, uncontrollable, and impractical aircraft. It would not be capable of flight under normal circumstances, and the forces and stresses involved would likely cause it to fail in the air. While it's an interesting thought experiment, such a plane would be a failure from both an engineering and an operational standpoint.
nice chatGPT there bud. This is a video game.
Bro wrote a whole essay complaining about a cursed thumbnail💀
@@choophineas6821 twas chatGPT, but yeah lol
You can tell it was chatGPT, because when he mentions engines, there is very clearly additional engines added in the thumbnail, but he says there is 4. That's because ChatGPT doens't know the thumbnail lol. Clout seeking idiot the OP is honestly.
2:19 wow, twin airplane
Good idea
😊
4:17 that was definitely personal lmao
So true lol lmao
4:17 was personal
Beacuse of how the E17 crashed
E3 senetry*
Fun Fact: The twin C-5 fused existed as a project to carry the space shuttle but it lost to the 747SCA (Shuttle Carrier Aircraft)
I didn't know that
Rqrdadadqddqdq
Me also
Its fake
@P1zza_bl0xXD it's not
1:20 nice landing
Love to see you kept going, in fact going beyond! Loved the fused C-5s ❤
Been watching this guy for YEARS🙏🙏
2:46 bro doesn't care about the helicopter
I think the pilot was blind
Yay more emergency landings yall can’t deny that is one of the best series
I’m glad you think so
@ I also subbed :D
The 2 c5 galaxies will now be called the c10 universe
Dude, i completely forgot about these videos. lol i remember one with this huge war with a10s, it's awesome you still do these. Thanks for being a childhood favorite on youtube
2:05 RIP fighter jet 😢
5:25 This fighter sliding instead of landing
Pilot: ah screw it im landing PeNgUiN sTyLe
1:13 please be butter
Yes
Mathis ur my fav youtuber dude i l9ved u back like 2 or more years ago i love u
I really like your videos there really cool y subscribed
The second landing was really clean, especially considering the lack of a rudder
Goated vids
You know it's a good day when he uploads
2:30 now we can hit both tower at once
4:14 wow a e-42 ............. !OF Turboprop fligh simulator
Ye I noticed it too. Tfs is kinda fun but besiege just has much better crash physics and animations
I think the e-42 from tfs is fictional, the real world equivalent is probably the E3 sentry if I remember correctly
0:03 hmmm that me remind something
Big mathis ficou muito bom esse vídeo de AVIAÇÃO
What game is that?
Besiege but it's only available on computer
7:11 whys the water solid 😂
It’s cool 😎 and I like the graphics in the game
2:17 this was unecpected lol
2:17 "now u can hıt the towers at once" - random twıtter comment
0:23 what map do you use cus I want to use it
I love how unrealistic the fact that the MD-11 was flying with it's left wing basically detached lol.
Could we be seeing F111 pigs? If it has a working crew mod, I'd be so hyped!
0:03
brian: LOOK OUT STEWIE
*debris start to fall off*
stewie: what the hell was that
C-55 Zwilling :3
Please make a crash but cockpit vision ❤
Sure
@@BigMathisyay
Tysm
I Remember watching you in 2021 when you had these blocky planes, i watched you soo much that i was thinking what game was that, thought it was mobile
Let’s go another awesome vid
Hi bro the all plane crash epic ❤
5:03 oh no!
I'm from Norway 🇧🇻 ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 9:14
3:29 oh lord butter?!
You should do a death by rotor blade compilation
thank you big mathis very cool
What game is it called in steam
It's called Besiege
UTA fight 772 0:40
0:00-0:32 unsurvivable
0:36-1:18 survivable
😮😮😮😮😮😮 2:18
What’s up dude🗿
Can we be best friend 😅
@ yea😀
Battle in the sky
While the ground forces take aim
The second one is definitely survivable.
2:24 C-55
2:25 c55
Could you make a video of all the rockets you used in your videos please?
Haven't I already done that?
I'm from Indonesian🇮🇩
Aku juga
MMMMMMMMMM soooo good and fire
Nice land
Do that game is awesome. I want it.😢😢😢
Imagine you’re just sleeping on a plane and then you’re about to hit the floor😂 bro is going to die😂 😂t😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 0:25
C-5 twin super galaxy will haunt me forever💀
0:00psa 183
we need behind the scenes!
4:50 bro did asiana 214
What is this plane is it the C-10 galaxy?
1st one is realistic
You Videos are cool but can you tell me Name the Game has Plese 🙂
100% survival, back probably only minor burns 1:22
1:05 I thought it would do a wing strike
1. What’s this game called?
2. Is it on mobile?
Besiege and no
2:56 how the hell did dead pilots put down the gears
5:00 Is this a Uruguayan Air Force plane?
C-5 Galaxy's ppppppppppppp UWU
4:47 that is a Ryan air butter landing
No wing no problem
Did he tried to eliminate the missile launcher ? 7:59
Can't believe you didn't do a head on perpendicular hit with 2 of the double cargos.. yet.
I’ll do it in the future
(2:25) What type of airplane is that
whats the first song?
Bro recreated psa flight 182💀
Cool!!!
5:01
Game name?
Besiege but only available on computer
@youranimeartist-q3x ok
What game is it
It's vidio ` what a beautiful😍😍😍 thing
How do you fly the planes with the same control different ways?
@BigMathis do you do it in multiplayer with a friend?
4:46 ansia moment
Happy cake day 😁
Game?
Name game?
9:22 that was a ryanair landing
What plane is that? 2:17
Idk
Mix C-5 Galaxy
1:15 mmm butter land
2:16 TWO AN- 225 MRIYA AND SABARA?
Is the first one like Aero Mexico?😱😱😱😱😱😱😨😨😨😨😨😨😱😱😱😱
what is the name of the game
Besiege but only available on computer