I currently have a 2120 with a 175 hpdi close to 900hrs glad I saw the video think I’ll go with the 225hp when it goes I’m getting 2.8-2.9 mpg at 26-28 mph 4000 rpms
I was talked out of the 225 because the performance gains are minimal vs the inline 200. The 225 is heavier and less fuel efficient. Low end torque is all that will be achieved. I honestly think the inline 200 is the perfect balance of performance and fuel efficiency. I would go with a 250 even though the 2120 is only rated for a 225 if you want better performance.
Two strokes are lighter than four strokes, so the performance will always be better with the same or close horsepower. I'm actually getting 3.2 mpg at 30 with my 200. Going faster, to a certain degree, is actually more fuel efficient. I also had two 1kw transom mount transducers, at the time, causing alot of drag. I have since gone through hull and picked up 2 more mph and 1 gph.
@@lou198 you would actually probably benefit with more horsepower if you are heavier. You are going to need the low end torque. But I have no issues with 3 people, a full tank, 3 big coolers of ice, and gear when I go 70 miles offshore. I usually burn 65 gallons on a 15 hr trip.
Honestly my buddies 200 yamaha gets up on plane a little better on his 2120. But it feels exactly the same everywhere else. My Suzuki is a little more fuel efficient though.
i love parker boats
@rafaelmontane7693 they are good boats. And I wouldn't ever go back to a center console after having a sport cabin.
Wow that’s a lot louder then the Yamaha outboard. I had a Yamaha 150 when I had my 2120. Happy boating
The Suzuki is alot more quieter than my f150 by a long shot.
ruclips.net/video/CzNN7S8S7_c/видео.html
@@bradp9938 I had the 06 model. For some reason I recall it being more quite.
@@IntellectualJourneys777 mine was a 2008. It did really well for being underpowered, but I couldn't hear myself think over it.
I currently have a 2120 with a 175 hpdi close to 900hrs glad I saw the video think I’ll go with the 225hp when it goes I’m getting 2.8-2.9 mpg at 26-28 mph 4000 rpms
I was talked out of the 225 because the performance gains are minimal vs the inline 200. The 225 is heavier and less fuel efficient. Low end torque is all that will be achieved. I honestly think the inline 200 is the perfect balance of performance and fuel efficiency. I would go with a 250 even though the 2120 is only rated for a 225 if you want better performance.
@@bradp9938 but it looked like you were doing 21 mph at 2.8 mpg did I read that right? Seas looked flat
Two strokes are lighter than four strokes, so the performance will always be better with the same or close horsepower. I'm actually getting 3.2 mpg at 30 with my 200. Going faster, to a certain degree, is actually more fuel efficient. I also had two 1kw transom mount transducers, at the time, causing alot of drag. I have since gone through hull and picked up 2 more mph and 1 gph.
@@bradp9938 that’s encouraging to hear I’m carrying more weight usually 3/4 tank a 9.9 kicker and 4 downriggers
@@lou198 you would actually probably benefit with more horsepower if you are heavier. You are going to need the low end torque. But I have no issues with 3 people, a full tank, 3 big coolers of ice, and gear when I go 70 miles offshore. I usually burn 65 gallons on a 15 hr trip.
Does the Suzuki have a better hole shot than your Yamaha
Honestly my buddies 200 yamaha gets up on plane a little better on his 2120. But it feels exactly the same everywhere else. My Suzuki is a little more fuel efficient though.
@@bradp9938 does both of them have around the same top speed
@@Honda1k mine is only 1 mph faster at 43.
What's your topend speed
I've been 43 with a full tank and 3 people.
@@bradp9938 Nice
Brad , did something happen to your df150?
I never had a df 150. I had a Yamaha f150. I sold it to get the df200.
@@bradp9938 gotcha. Just looking at downsizing and was wondering if the 150 just wasn't enough if seas got rough.
@@jigity-j the 150 does fine, but in certain conditions it's not ideal. The 200 should be the absolute minimum with the 2120.
@@bradp9938 thanks for the info Brad.
@@jigity-j anytime brother!
Wow… that is flat water
DEFINITELY! Don't get many days like that.