I'm in my understudies to become a LADC, this class hasn't kicked my butt until I ran into classical and operant conditioning and the next chapter combined with this one is Memory, so I have the Learning chapter, which includes classical, operant and other conditioning theories, plus memory, I'm really struggling, but I'm trying to be a creator mindset and not a victim, but its hard. I'm lost.......I can't seem to figure it out. I've done so well up until these two last chapters. These videos are awesome. I'm going to keep watching them until it sticks. the text through Macmillan is so confusing, not nearly as informative as these videos. Thank you brother Brian.
your explaining is excellent❤️🙏, but i have a quick question for you if its okay.Who stated that the mind actively process information rather than passively following operant conditioning? And thank you😁
Good video, but although the procedure of operant conditioning has merits, behavior analysts have always eschewed explaining why it works, and for good reason, for a good explanation derived from neuroscience can upset a lot of apple carts. To wit: Operant conditioning and classical (respondent) conditioning do NOT reflect separate processes, only separate procedures. Reinforcement is due to changing information or expectancies, and not due to S-R linkages. Reinforcement is affective, or it feels good or bad, mainly due to the neurochemical activity in the brain as represented by dopamine and opioid systems. Reinforcement is continuous, not discrete, and occurs when information changes or when it is expected to change (also known as priming effects, as when you alert to an incoming surprise, such as a lottery drawing) Bio-behavioral or ‘unified reinforcement principles’ have been around and accepted by Skinnerian behaviorists and neuro-psychologists alike, and replace operant and respondent paradigms with a new way of looking at and implementing reinforcement that is based on ‘discrepancy’ principles. The good news is that all of this fits perfectly fine under what is called a ‘radical behaviorism’, the bad news is that behavior analysts will have to change how they explain operant conditioning, and even the procedures they use. References here from a lay and academic point of view. www.scribd.com/document/495438436/A-Mouse-s-Tale-a-practical-explanation-and-handbook-of-motivation-from-the-perspective-of-a-humble-creature www.researchgate.net/publication/262511550_Learning_processes_and_the_neural_analysis_of_conditioning
Your alarm clock is away from your bed and when it goes off it blares Opera or something else you find annoying. WHEN you GET OUT OF BED to start your day, you shut it off, REMOVING (negative) something annoying in order to increase the likelihood (Reinforcement) that you will get out of bed again next time as soon as it goes off. Hope this helps. Licenses School Psychologist and private counselor.
I'm in my understudies to become a LADC, this class hasn't kicked my butt until I ran into classical and operant conditioning and the next chapter combined with this one is Memory, so I have the Learning chapter, which includes classical, operant and other conditioning theories, plus memory, I'm really struggling, but I'm trying to be a creator mindset and not a victim, but its hard. I'm lost.......I can't seem to figure it out. I've done so well up until these two last chapters. These videos are awesome. I'm going to keep watching them until it sticks. the text through Macmillan is so confusing, not nearly as informative as these videos. Thank you brother Brian.
Positive reinforcement yields a REWARD (adding something the organism desires) Negative reinforcement provides RELIEF (subtracting something the organism finds unpleasant)
Definitely a good way to think about it!
DAMN. wow thanks
Damn thank you for this!
Great ❤
You are excellent. Thank you!
Very informative video! However, wasn't the law of effect conceptualized by Thorndike?
hey it was but its all under operant conditioning :)
your explaining is excellent❤️🙏, but i have a quick question for you if its okay.Who stated that the mind actively process information rather than passively following operant conditioning?
And thank you😁
Thank you for a very clear explanation. :)
Good video, but although the procedure of operant conditioning has merits, behavior analysts have always eschewed explaining why it works, and for good reason, for a good explanation derived from neuroscience can upset a lot of apple carts.
To wit:
Operant conditioning and classical (respondent) conditioning do NOT reflect separate processes, only separate procedures.
Reinforcement is due to changing information or expectancies, and not due to S-R linkages.
Reinforcement is affective, or it feels good or bad, mainly due to the neurochemical activity in the brain as represented by dopamine and opioid systems.
Reinforcement is continuous, not discrete, and occurs when information changes or when it is expected to change (also known as priming effects, as when you alert to an incoming surprise, such as a lottery drawing)
Bio-behavioral or ‘unified reinforcement principles’ have been around and accepted by Skinnerian behaviorists and neuro-psychologists alike, and replace operant and respondent paradigms with a new way of looking at and implementing reinforcement that is based on ‘discrepancy’ principles. The good news is that all of this fits perfectly fine under what is called a ‘radical behaviorism’, the bad news is that behavior analysts will have to change how they explain operant conditioning, and even the procedures they use.
References here from a lay and academic point of view.
www.scribd.com/document/495438436/A-Mouse-s-Tale-a-practical-explanation-and-handbook-of-motivation-from-the-perspective-of-a-humble-creature
www.researchgate.net/publication/262511550_Learning_processes_and_the_neural_analysis_of_conditioning
Wow loved it
Your website is not private
How can I sign in. My email is failing to sign in
Excellent!
Thank you for watching!
Hello, I would like to know , what software was used to create this video? I saw many people using it , but I can't find the name. Can anyone help me?
www.vyond.com
@@LearnMyTest Thank you
Anyone knows what happens if the reward PRECEDES the behavior?
Hi God, it's me, Margaret! If the reward comes before the behavior, that is classical conditioning. As studied by Pavlov.
The cat with the string? That's Thorndike
Isn’t this thorndike’s theory?
solid 12000 views but 2 comments
I thought Thorndike was the one that incorporated the cats and the maze.
Thorndike did work with cats and puzzles boxes.
#3
That's wrong, the cat was Edward thorndike the ray was skinner
I dont understand your example in negative reinforcement
Your alarm clock is away from your bed and when it goes off it blares Opera or something else you find annoying. WHEN you GET OUT OF BED to start your day, you shut it off, REMOVING (negative) something annoying in order to increase the likelihood (Reinforcement) that you will get out of bed again next time as soon as it goes off.
Hope this helps. Licenses School Psychologist and private counselor.