He’s a born liar and should’ve gone to prison for a bit. This is the guy who was later convicted of insurance fraud. Don’t be fooled by the posh accent, he clearly has Harrods taste and a pound shop wallet.
What these people do with their money is beyond me. He had a Majors wage and she was some sort of nursery teacher, plus she previously won 32 grand. Yet somehow they're still skint
I don’t know if you are religious, and it’s perfectly alright if you are not, but I am and one way of interpreting that having happened to him is that it was GOD’s punishment for his sinful behaviour: deception and greed. SMH.
For the million pound question, he says at first-"I think it's a nanomole, but it could be a gigabyte."- then after the cough, he eliminates nanomole and gigabyte and then goes for the one he never heard of???-lol
He did that multiple times too. I think 3 times he clearly stated he was confident with a certain answer, and right after the cough he just goes straight to an answer he never heard of.
@@kylemc0254So he pretended not to have heard of Haussmann/Googol to be entertaining? Might I suggest that a more likely explanation for the Haussmann question is that he saw an obviously German name, thought “I know this!”, and fell into the trap of not checking. You literally see him freeze when Whittock coughs on “Paris”.
@@c2fish1 well uve never seen the real footage its all editted to volume up the coughing.... And yes i think the harder questions he talked em all out to be entertaining they believed boring contestants get a unfairer go
@@kylemc0254The problem is he didn’t contribute any extra knowledge that made me believe he knew the answer. Someone who knew Haussmann did Paris wouldn’t have wasted their time with the obvious “trap” answer. Someone who got to Googol through elimination would explain the process of elimination (like that the other three were SI prefixes). He didn’t do that. The only explanation (other than cheating) is that he feigned ignorance to make the show more exciting. But given how defensive he is about his intelligence (to the point of shouting at the interviewer unprovoked), I don’t buy that either.
Their was no doctored evidence about this. It was fraud end of, and the jury delivered the right verdict. The evidence against them was irrefutable. Besides wasn't he ( Charles Imgram) also convicted of insurance fraud.
Interesting transition from a happy go lucky, not particularly clever gameshow contestant "trying his luck" to, a very coherent and intelligent person, once challenged.
The way the “cheat show” was mounted and the coughing amplified, it is clear he’s guilty because the proof has been shown to us that way but if the major could hear the coughing why couldn’t the host of the show hear them?
I’m sure the host technically registered the coughing, but he’s been in that studio many many times and so probably tunes it out as background noise and simply focuses on the entertainment and smooth-running of the immediate situation. So he’s not very reliable considering he’s a very effective and attentive host. Plus since the coughing was amplified in the documentary for a better viewing experience, I’m sure the various audience noises were mixed in but there was just enough of a distinct and directional cough for the major to distinguish it from the other studio noises. Just saying the question isn’t very compelling if you ponder itb
24:19 - 😂 they kept the part in where Charles appears to slump down once he believes the cameras have stopped - Diana is quick to stop him and Charles raises an "oops" hand to his face.
In the interviews I do see what I interpret as micro expressions of duping delight So unless they regularly have facial expressions like that in day to day life and it’s normal and it applies to them even when they are honest, and people who know them know that and have good experiences with them then they will trust them and won’t be suspicious But of course people who don’t know them will be suspicious as We won’t see it as in the norm for someone honest to regularly show deceptive facial expressions
Im very surprised the host didnt mention one of the most important pieces of evidence - the connection between them and tecwen wittock as it was traced down in the phone calls. Clearly they called each other, based on that alone this entire thing just cant be a coincidence.
+@glutamin111, What's amazing though, is how outside a very small circle of people (who just happen to be friends/family of theirs) nobody believes them. His defence seems to be that he couldn't hear the cough's, but even if you edit out the cough's, the way he answers all the questions is not only unusual and illogical, but it's pure luck.
@@ChrisJohnson-x1x thats a bit harsh i wouldnt say all the questions, he actually had a very good intuition on most of the questions up until the final two questions and the craig david one, clearly he knew some of the answers and had fair reasoning, i agree his style was strange it raised a few redflags immediately but to this day im entirely convinced If he quit at 250.000£ he would get away with it.. last two question he was beyond clueless, it was beyond absurd&bizzare the way he shifted from berlin to paris with no reasoning and then did the same thing with the last question, starting from nanomole then going for the one he never heard of, just because he hasnt heard of it...😂😂 like who the f**k on this planet answers questions like that🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️ and just considering the sheer money weight of the question his audacity made zero sense
@@glutamin111 He explained, albeit in court and not on set, why he changed from Berlin to Paris: "I knew that Paris was a planned city," explains Charles. "The centre of Paris was cleared of slums during the 19th century, and it was rebuilt into districts and boulevards. Prominent in my mind was the economic reason. In the middle of the 19th century France was coming out of the revolutionary period and it was decided, I think by Napoleon III, that he would concentrate on Paris and thereby the remainder of France would flourish."
@@SteRDLK He also explained very clearly on the set that he had no idea who Baron Haussmann was -> 'Haussmann is more of a german name then italian name, athens name or parisian name' No kidding!! My 10 year old nephew knows that and nobody offered him half a million to answer that😂😂 ..seems kind of a cheap giveaway for a question worth that much, no?🤦🏼♂️
They couldn't get 10yrs as the cheque was never given authorisation as it was held for 8 days. In which that time they cancelled it and sent the case to police.
@@arianagrandefan934 Maybe they should have given him the cheque then, allowed him to cash it, then within 24 hours, the Police turn up to his house at 2am, pull him out of bed in his underwear, then 6 months later, he gets what he deserves (including his Wife and Tecwen). EDIT: But then again, knowingly giving a cheque to someone you believe cheated, that would come under as entrapment, but he did lose his title of Major, and basically never worked again (and just lived off savings, including having to sell his house), so I suppose Karma took care of him a little bit, also birds of a feather flock together, so I assume he would find it hard to make friends, as who wants to be friends with a convicted fraudster.
How does 10 years benefit society? They had to pay something like 150K US plus go through the trial and lose face, they could have been put in prison too for 12-18 months. But 10 years is not proportionate. They are guilty and they have paid and will continue to emotionally.
If I hadn't cheated and I was being accused of cheating and the money was being threatened I would go crazy. I would flat out deny it and be angry at the mere idea of it. Any innocent person would react the same. His reaction was a dead give away.
This is staggering to watch. They seem to know so much about why they aren't guilty, but they have no anger about being wronged. Merely gets angry when he says he isn't stupid.
He received a phone call to say that they can't pay his million pound because of a suspected fraud and he said "oh" oh lol I'd have hit the bloody roof if I wasn't cheating 😂😂
Wonder how the pair are doing now? That would be interesting! It was also a fluke that 9/11 clashed with what would have been the likely transmission date of the episode. Anyway the couple have certainly changed the program and it’s recruiting process for ever after.
No normal person who wasn’t sitting in the chair with hindsight would’ve done that. But in the chair, which is such a hard to relate to position to be in, it’s not possible to deduce how others would act if they were cheating. I suspect more people than you give credit for; in the same way gambling hacks the mind and you feel moronic for spending much more time and money in a casino than you ever would’ve planned for initially
The one thing I take from watching this is Charles certainly loves being the centre of attention it's like he had the whole thing scripted from beginning to end I loved the outrange innocence attitude he plays on lol
"Did you 2 cheat?" "Can i ask the audience?" "ok, 100% of the Audience says yes you did cheat" "50/50 then please" "The two choices remaining are Yes You Did and Cough, Splutter, Bgger Me, do bears sht in the woods we did" "I suppose i better phone a friend then. Well, ex friend" "Hi ex friend of these 2, the options are No, Only a Little, Dont Know or Yes ......(cough)"
The guy who was coughing and helping him, got into that hot chair and haven't even won the first 3 questions. How he was able to know the answers for major?
He didn't cough in every question,only the ones he knew, people that goes to those kind of shows prepare themselves for harder questions but no for the easy ones where you can easily fail if they ask something a teen would know but not an adult
In the documentary he also asks the other players in whispers to get 2 of the answers, and the wife coughs for one he doesn’t know. I think he must have also been under extreme psychological pressure after going too far and knowing it then getting on stage. He probably wasn’t together at that point, despite appearances.
Reductive question. The pressure and emotional strain of being up in the chair and the amplified doubts make it exponentially more difficult to feel confident with answers even if you think you know a good portion. Also just because you knew a decent chunk of answers for one game doesn’t mean you will for another game. Also he got help on several answers by asking another contestent, who knows how many times, but at least 2.
Tbf hes been trained to be entertaining to get eaiser questions even tho theres no way to get easy questions The only footage shown is editted lets see the real footage The easy questions were hard for him as we dont all watch soaps and listen to rubbish music
Why do you think the wife didn't cheat? She is on camera coughing when Whittaker didn't know the answer, who she kept looking at. That sounds and looks like cheating.
They're not going to appeal for possibly teo reasons. Either Their Legal team have advised them not too, or they both know that it would be futile based on the evidence against them, not to mention costly. Would really love to see them both do a lie detector test. 😮
He seems fairly sincere to me I honestly believe him, how would the people doing the coughing just happen to know all the correct answers, surely they were searched along with Charles with nothing found?
Cant lie to save himself. As for the heated argument and shouting I wish he would have said 'it was not fighting at all but um.. er .. rather celebrating' as they both share a subtle but naughty smile. But no. Not even fun liars.
I do think they're guilty. But at same time. His right the doc was one sided. And they isolated the coughs to only hear tecwen coughs. They muted out other coughs on the show. As clearly Tarrant said loads of people were coughing
Yeah…but Tecwin asking the two answers plus the Major’s wife coughing an answer…the “no” cough…the glances…I mean they were obviously guilty and to call it one-sided seems a bit silly. If they committed the damn crime, the evidence will be there…highlighting the pattern so the doc audience can follow isn’t being one-sided…it’s highlighting the evidence…necessary in making the case.
It"s nowadays simply next to rarity that, some people are not getting what they really deserve! For that, this family is lucky. They chose cheating and now they are getting what they deserve.
The interviewer should ask Charles Ingram the same 15 questions
Clever
lol
He'd probably just say the stress of his innocence has caused him amnesia
Hahahahaha
Brilliant
At least he is answering without the aid of cough.
*(cough cough)* Definitely. *(cough cough)*
he should have mixed it up with with a fart and a burp .😊
He’s a born liar and should’ve gone to prison for a bit. This is the guy who was later convicted of insurance fraud. Don’t be fooled by the posh accent, he clearly has Harrods taste and a pound shop wallet.
What these people do with their money is beyond me. He had a Majors wage and she was some sort of nursery teacher, plus she previously won 32 grand. Yet somehow they're still skint
When I saw the game show I thought he was just a buffoon but after seeing this I can tell he's a sophisticated liar and talks like a guilty politician
He's suffering from an illness called "being a pathalogical liar", his wife suffers the same. But he makes his money.
He should just be a politician
he's lying through his teeth, dental records must be a disaster at this point :)
Haha 😂 brilliant 😁
He'd make a brilliant politition
Thanks for uploading this. Ive never seen this before. Most full interviews with ingram seem to be lost
'These two people are a classic example of 'if you mumble a lie one million times it will become the truth someday'
It will not !!!!
She went mad as he went to far as the greed took over
That's right. You could see it in her face.
I’m sure that if you put this guy on a lie detector he would absolutely flat line it. He absolutely believes what he’s saying
It's not a lie if you don't believe it's a lie .
George Costanza.
@@julienfroidevaux1143 well … except that it is. I could believe that I’m Horatio Nelson but it wouldn’t be true
@@Doctor180185 I think he'd make a good politician .
".. I'm not thick .. I'm a member of MENSA..!!" 🤣🤣
He is?
@@kylemc0254 If he's a member of MENSA he must've bribed his way in! 🤣
@@mcvicarross7 there was someone coughing in the background during the iq tests 😂
@@Mark-lj1dj 🤣 he was as thick as shit! 😆👍
😜
"I am not thick" he says. In 2010, Ingram lost three toes on his left foot in an accident involving a lawnmower.
I don’t know if you are religious, and it’s perfectly alright if you are not, but I am and one way of interpreting that having happened to him is that it was GOD’s punishment for his sinful behaviour: deception and greed. SMH.
Great interviewer, not afraid to ask them tough questions.
I agree the questions were very good, but the interviewer continuing to interrupt them got to me a little
Well it is called hardtalk?
he looks like the sort of person who you would catch stealing a £500 note from the Monolopy bank
When the jury delivered their verdict, the judge asked, 'Is that your final answer?'.
For the million pound question, he says at first-"I think it's a nanomole, but it could be a gigabyte."- then after the cough, he eliminates nanomole and gigabyte and then goes for the one he never heard of???-lol
He did that multiple times too. I think 3 times he clearly stated he was confident with a certain answer, and right after the cough he just goes straight to an answer he never heard of.
Youve only seen the editted version remember... And he was trained to be entertaining in changeing answers
@@kylemc0254So he pretended not to have heard of Haussmann/Googol to be entertaining?
Might I suggest that a more likely explanation for the Haussmann question is that he saw an obviously German name, thought “I know this!”, and fell into the trap of not checking. You literally see him freeze when Whittock coughs on “Paris”.
@@c2fish1 well uve never seen the real footage its all editted to volume up the coughing.... And yes i think the harder questions he talked em all out to be entertaining they believed boring contestants get a unfairer go
@@kylemc0254The problem is he didn’t contribute any extra knowledge that made me believe he knew the answer.
Someone who knew Haussmann did Paris wouldn’t have wasted their time with the obvious “trap” answer. Someone who got to Googol through elimination would explain the process of elimination (like that the other three were SI prefixes).
He didn’t do that. The only explanation (other than cheating) is that he feigned ignorance to make the show more exciting. But given how defensive he is about his intelligence (to the point of shouting at the interviewer unprovoked), I don’t buy that either.
"I'm not thick!" (Angry expression) - you are thick 🤣
squalid people. Especially the wife. It's incredible that after seeing herself in the recordings she had the nerve to declare herself Innocent.
Yeah she gave it away entirely..her expressions and reactions were completely transparent…
lol it's pretty funny watching Charles blatantly lying here. Anyone who has watched the infamous episode will know there was cheating
The unintentional entertainment value these folks have produced will live on…😂
The only surprising thing to me is how he ever got to be a major...
Thanks for posting, never seen this before
Greedy people
Hes the type of guy to make a mess at the back of a toilet bowl and not clean it up
Corrrr he’s done this a few times in the mirror 🤣🤦🏼♂️
The interviewer clearly believes they're guilty
Cause they are
That is a fair enough view considering they had already been convicted of fraud.
And they were convicted because they were obviously guilty
@@nathanbabiuk6286 If it was obvious they were guilty then why did Celador/ITV have to present doctored evidence?
Their was no doctored evidence about this. It was fraud end of, and the jury delivered the right verdict. The evidence against them was irrefutable. Besides wasn't he ( Charles Imgram) also convicted of insurance fraud.
Interesting transition from a happy go lucky, not particularly clever gameshow contestant "trying his luck" to, a very coherent and intelligent person, once challenged.
( 18:03 ) this moment! 😱
@@CJFS00s right, this man knows exactly what he did. Calculated, very smart guy.
Did anyone cough in this interview? 😂
I was waiting for one of them to cough when the presenter asked them 'did you cheat' 🙊
Surprised he’s not being sponsored by Benylin!
I don't think he knows it himself.. I actually think he thinks he won the money fairly..
Mental illness is no laughing matter
Tell a lie over and over again and it becomes the truth, especially to oneself.
The way the “cheat show” was mounted and the coughing amplified, it is clear he’s guilty because the proof has been shown to us that way but if the major could hear the coughing why couldn’t the host of the show hear them?
I’m sure the host technically registered the coughing, but he’s been in that studio many many times and so probably tunes it out as background noise and simply focuses on the entertainment and smooth-running of the immediate situation. So he’s not very reliable considering he’s a very effective and attentive host. Plus since the coughing was amplified in the documentary for a better viewing experience, I’m sure the various audience noises were mixed in but there was just enough of a distinct and directional cough for the major to distinguish it from the other studio noises. Just saying the question isn’t very compelling if you ponder itb
Honest Charles and Diane , unbelievable.
24:19 - 😂 they kept the part in where Charles appears to slump down once he believes the cameras have stopped - Diana is quick to stop him and Charles raises an "oops" hand to his face.
He's such a buffoon!
He was told to resign his Queen Commission and kept his pension rights. He lost his shit at 4.50 enough said.
In the interviews I do see what I interpret as micro expressions of duping delight
So unless they regularly have facial expressions like that in day to day life and it’s normal and it applies to them even when they are honest, and people who know them know that and have good experiences with them then they will trust them and won’t be suspicious
But of course people who don’t know them will be suspicious as We won’t see it as in the norm for someone honest to regularly show deceptive facial expressions
You don’t have to be a member of Mensa to operate a lawnmower
How can you deny?!
Are they for real?!
Damn narcissists 😡
And he’s talking about his IQ 😂😂😂 but didn’t hear about coldplay 😂
@@zarkodzabic5627you think knowing pop music makes you smart or something? 😂
@@jakedasilva6847 look man, i am from serbia and i know them, and i do not even listen that type of music, so it’s a little bit strange
@@zarkodzabic5627
*Correction:* _Craig David._
Im very surprised the host didnt mention one of the most important pieces of evidence - the connection between them and tecwen wittock as it was traced down in the phone calls. Clearly they called each other, based on that alone this entire thing just cant be a coincidence.
+@glutamin111,
What's amazing though, is how outside a very small circle of people (who just happen to be friends/family of theirs) nobody believes them.
His defence seems to be that he couldn't hear the cough's, but even if you edit out the cough's, the way he answers all the questions is not only unusual and illogical, but it's pure luck.
@@ChrisJohnson-x1x thats a bit harsh i wouldnt say all the questions, he actually had a very good intuition on most of the questions up until the final two questions and the craig david one, clearly he knew some of the answers and had fair reasoning, i agree his style was strange it raised a few redflags immediately but to this day im entirely convinced If he quit at 250.000£ he would get away with it..
last two question he was beyond clueless, it was beyond absurd&bizzare the way he shifted from berlin to paris with no reasoning and then did the same thing with the last question, starting from nanomole then going for the one he never heard of, just because he hasnt heard of it...😂😂 like who the f**k on this planet answers questions like that🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️ and just considering the sheer money weight of the question his audacity made zero sense
@@glutamin111 He explained, albeit in court and not on set, why he changed from Berlin to Paris: "I knew that Paris was a planned city," explains Charles. "The centre of Paris was cleared of slums during the 19th century, and it was rebuilt into districts and boulevards. Prominent in my mind was the economic reason. In the middle of the 19th century France was coming out of the revolutionary period and it was decided, I think by Napoleon III, that he would concentrate on Paris and thereby the remainder of France would flourish."
@@SteRDLK He also explained very clearly on the set that he had no idea who Baron Haussmann was -> 'Haussmann is more of a german name then italian name, athens name or parisian name'
No kidding!! My 10 year old nephew knows that and nobody offered him half a million to answer that😂😂 ..seems kind of a cheap giveaway for a question worth that much, no?🤦🏼♂️
@@glutamin111 Haussmann is a German name so he wasn't wrong
should have got 10 years for that kind of money fraud
They couldn't get 10yrs as the cheque was never given authorisation as it was held for 8 days. In which that time they cancelled it and sent the case to police.
@@arianagrandefan934
Maybe they should have given him the cheque then, allowed him to cash it, then within 24 hours, the Police turn up to his house at 2am, pull him out of bed in his underwear, then 6 months later, he gets what he deserves (including his Wife and Tecwen).
EDIT: But then again, knowingly giving a cheque to someone you believe cheated, that would come under as entrapment, but he did lose his title of Major, and basically never worked again (and just lived off savings, including having to sell his house), so I suppose Karma took care of him a little bit, also birds of a feather flock together, so I assume he would find it hard to make friends, as who wants to be friends with a convicted fraudster.
How does 10 years benefit society? They had to pay something like 150K US plus go through the trial and lose face, they could have been put in prison too for 12-18 months. But 10 years is not proportionate. They are guilty and they have paid and will continue to emotionally.
I saw them both running a market stall on guildford high street a few years ago.
What were they selling, please?
@@kp9952 Cough medicine
Wow! Until I saw this I was convinced he was guilty!!!
He should be compensated!
The show didnt want to reward a lame uninteresting contestant? They set him up with fake cough recordings? Mmmm
Typical middle class response to being caught red handed, pathetic but not surprising.
Lol what the F does middle class have to do with it?
If I hadn't cheated and I was being accused of cheating and the money was being threatened I would go crazy. I would flat out deny it and be angry at the mere idea of it. Any innocent person would react the same. His reaction was a dead give away.
This is staggering to watch. They seem to know so much about why they aren't guilty, but they have no anger about being wronged. Merely gets angry when he says he isn't stupid.
If you were both that exhausted after the show you would not have been making phone calls
I’d have more respect if they’d fess up ! Tried it, messed it up and screwed up….
They were guilty as sin.
He never gives up! A total knob!
He received a phone call to say that they can't pay his million pound because of a suspected fraud and he said "oh" oh lol I'd have hit the bloody roof if I wasn't cheating 😂😂
Wonder how the pair are doing now? That would be interesting! It was also a fluke that 9/11 clashed with what would have been the likely transmission date of the episode. Anyway the couple have certainly changed the program and it’s recruiting process for ever after.
To quote Forrest Gump: stupid is as stupid does.
Yes Charles you are thick.
100% guilty!!!!!!!
This is hard to watch. Can’t help thinking Jon Sopiel wouldn’t be be this harsh with any political
No normal person would of took the chance of risked going for the million pound question that never knew the answer to especially that have children
No normal person who wasn’t sitting in the chair with hindsight would’ve done that. But in the chair, which is such a hard to relate to position to be in, it’s not possible to deduce how others would act if they were cheating. I suspect more people than you give credit for; in the same way gambling hacks the mind and you feel moronic for spending much more time and money in a casino than you ever would’ve planned for initially
They couldn't lie straight in bed.😂😂
Shame he didnt go to jail
Wow. Never knew this existed. Lying through his back teeth
The one thing I take from watching this is Charles certainly loves being the centre of attention it's like he had the whole thing scripted from beginning to end I loved the outrange innocence attitude he plays on lol
Did you see him on a morning tv show talking about past life progression? I was a bit confused by why the program got him involved
"Did you 2 cheat?"
"Can i ask the audience?"
"ok, 100% of the Audience says yes you did cheat"
"50/50 then please"
"The two choices remaining are Yes You Did and Cough, Splutter, Bgger Me, do bears sht in the woods we did"
"I suppose i better phone a friend then. Well, ex friend"
"Hi ex friend of these 2, the options are No, Only a Little, Dont Know or Yes ......(cough)"
IQ 149 puts him at almost the max, like 0.1% of people or even less. people love to overestimate their IQ.
I believe they are guilty but how do they have some genius in the crowd who knows all the answers?Why isn't he in the hot seat winning the million..
He got in the hot seat and got £1000 😂
The guy who was coughing and helping him, got into that hot chair and haven't even won the first 3 questions. How he was able to know the answers for major?
He didn't cough in every question,only the ones he knew, people that goes to those kind of shows prepare themselves for harder questions but no for the easy ones where you can easily fail if they ask something a teen would know but not an adult
In the documentary he also asks the other players in whispers to get 2 of the answers, and the wife coughs for one he doesn’t know. I think he must have also been under extreme psychological pressure after going too far and knowing it then getting on stage. He probably wasn’t together at that point, despite appearances.
what a stupid question? a genius man can miss a simple question... so there are random questions in a field that a child may know and u dont.
He has a iq of 150 but lies like a iq of 10
Reductive question. The pressure and emotional strain of being up in the chair and the amplified doubts make it exponentially more difficult to feel confident with answers even if you think you know a good portion. Also just because you knew a decent chunk of answers for one game doesn’t mean you will for another game. Also he got help on several answers by asking another contestent, who knows how many times, but at least 2.
Tbf hes been trained to be entertaining to get eaiser questions even tho theres no way to get easy questions
The only footage shown is editted lets see the real footage
The easy questions were hard for him as we dont all watch soaps and listen to rubbish music
Nobody could of guessed the answers like the way he did and get them right nobody thats fact
Which ones did he guess?
Liar liar pants on fire 😂😂😂😂😂🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
No wonder why he got kicked out of the Army.
Yooh I can't believe this 😮😮😮
I'm sure he was a good soldier, but he made a very poor judgement call going through with this plan. He should have known better.
Hes such a dishonorable git, meanwhile his wife really didn't cheat and seems to be living poorly at his whim
Why do you think the wife didn't cheat? She is on camera coughing when Whittaker didn't know the answer, who she kept looking at. That sounds and looks like cheating.
I think the wife wears the pants in that relationship…
The lowest form of human waste....
It was simply an open and shut case, he was clearly cheating
Play them the clip of ALL the coughs 😏😏😏😏
This guy is a professional liar, talking to fast and he is too alert.
They're not going to appeal for possibly teo reasons. Either Their Legal team have advised them not too, or they both know that it would be futile based on the evidence against them, not to mention costly. Would really love to see them both do a lie detector test. 😮
He seems fairly sincere to me I honestly believe him, how would the people doing the coughing just happen to know all the correct answers, surely they were searched along with Charles with nothing found?
Would you be interested in buying a bridge I have for sale? I’ll give you first refusal.
Even one of the contestants son said he is at it dad fact
Even the people who was sat behind his wife knew what was happening because they was laughing everytime one of them coughed !
Keir starmer and Charles ingram are the two biggest slimy liars ive ever seen
Definition of guilty...them two
this is the result of greed.. they have tons of cash from the Army.. and still lying!
Cant lie to save himself. As for the heated argument and shouting I wish he would have said 'it was not fighting at all but um.. er .. rather celebrating' as they both share a subtle but naughty smile. But no. Not even fun liars.
Still not convinced!!!!!
It was a gameshow!!! He did nothing wrong...
Major was going on the counter attack, but thanks for the entertainment sir!
😂
WHAT A LIAR.
I do think they're guilty. But at same time. His right the doc was one sided. And they isolated the coughs to only hear tecwen coughs. They muted out other coughs on the show. As clearly Tarrant said loads of people were coughing
Yeah…but Tecwin asking the two answers plus the Major’s wife coughing an answer…the “no” cough…the glances…I mean they were obviously guilty and to call it one-sided seems a bit silly. If they committed the damn crime, the evidence will be there…highlighting the pattern so the doc audience can follow isn’t being one-sided…it’s highlighting the evidence…necessary in making the case.
lol he blatantly doesnt believe them at all,
It"s nowadays simply next to rarity that, some people are not getting what they really deserve! For that, this family is lucky. They chose cheating and now they are getting what they deserve.
Tgey make a great point about the gasp id change my answer aswell very clever i think hes innocent feel sorry for him
Wow, he really knows how to lie. I bet he can also beat a lie detector.
Wow. Is it even possible for someone to be in that much denial? Apparently so 😂
What was it like in the dressing room. She had a sore throat for some reason.
18:02 Yeah, you are. VERY much so 😂
Scammers
im convinced
Mhm 😂
One of the fastest finger contestants son said to his dad their at ii dad even the contestant sat behind tecwen knew what was going on
Look at his eyes a constant liar.
Some piece of work. These two 😂.
Lying cheats
BS greed .
He's not thick.😂😂😂
awful people