Polar Vantage M3 In-Depth Review: Everything That's New!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 дек 2024

Комментарии • 74

  • @_J.F_
    @_J.F_ Месяц назад +49

    Personally I don't mind the lack of software features as I think my favourite watch (Garmin Fenix) is beginning to go way beyond what most people will require and we end up paying for a lot of development of stuff we do not need, and very often do not want either. I own a Fenix 7 Pro right now but doubt that I will want to continue with the Fenix watches as they are getting too expensive and include a world of stuff I don't want either, so a much more basic watch, but with premium build quality, is certainly something I will be looking at for future watches.

    • @chopsuey33
      @chopsuey33 Месяц назад

      I think about the brand value of fenix pro. It has larger market for resale too

    • @JoopHbR
      @JoopHbR Месяц назад +1

      That is my idea as well, as a Forerunner 955 owner

    • @_J.F_
      @_J.F_ Месяц назад +1

      @@chopsuey33 That is true but only to some extent. See what you get (not what people ask but what they actually sell for) for an e.g. 3 year old Garmin Fenix 7 watch and you will still be taking some significant loss when selling. The same of course goes for all other electronics too. 2-3 years down the road no one wants them as they are outdated and cannot run the latest features and updates.

  • @ActiveIdeas
    @ActiveIdeas Месяц назад +10

    Wild timings on the software release dates 🤯 Nice to see Polar getting the price right (just) this time though!! Nice Ray

  • @hardmtnbiker
    @hardmtnbiker Месяц назад +7

    I’ve been a fan of Polar ever since the S710 and when they had PC Software and an IR interface to download data. My latest watches were the M2 and V2. I loved the user experience and the Cycle Test,Recovery Test and other features that are very useful for deep data analysis. In particular my watch just keeps resetting mid workout or test.
    The Polar Flow is great but the addition aspects of Garmin Connect to expand your data dashboards is really nice.
    Unfortunately the glitches just were too much that led me to Garmin World with my Forerunner,Edge,Rally Power and cadence.
    I still prefer the Polar H10 HRM strap over the Garmin Pro.

  • @Sinasi08
    @Sinasi08 Месяц назад +9

    Hopefully Polar will see/hear the conclusion at the end. Very good points / remarks by Ray.

  • @YuureiKage
    @YuureiKage Месяц назад +8

    Coming from Epix and, briefly, Race S I must say I'm pleased that Polar is not adding a new feature every quarter. Less is more in this case, at least for me.

    • @ChristianSlagter
      @ChristianSlagter Месяц назад +1

      What are you currently wearing and did you not like about the Race S?

    • @YuureiKage
      @YuureiKage Месяц назад

      @@ChristianSlagter I'm back to Vantage V3. With Race S, it was nothing major, rather small things or nitpicks - for example, I like that with Polar I can open a web app and see things on a bigger screen. Suunto's mobile app is really nice, but small screen is small screen and the amount of information sometimes overwhelmed me. I think that the issue I didn't like the most was the fact that Race S can't notify me when I'm out of the zone/pace required in structured workout. Overall, I think that Race S is a good watch (great even, considering the price), but Polar's experience suits me better - it's more on point, and I also like UI/UX better (on the watch and in the apps, although not going to lie, phone app could get some more love ;)).

    • @jeffreytillack4709
      @jeffreytillack4709 Месяц назад +2

      @@ChristianSlagter Loving my Race S. Not missing my Garmin's at all.

  • @JungleJim001
    @JungleJim001 Месяц назад +12

    To be honest, better less frequent releases with features that work well and have been tested thoroughly than more frequent releases with features that don't work well and break existing functionality (looking at you, Garmin...)

  • @Jb305903
    @Jb305903 Месяц назад +6

    Garmin better release a cheaper watch with offline maps if they want to compete. Seems like everyone but Garmin has sub $400 watches with map support.

  • @konstantinschraps2536
    @konstantinschraps2536 Месяц назад +2

    A huge reason for buying a polar watch is that I can use the platform. Allowing me to plan my training etc. and without a trainer and even stop paying for TrainingPeaks. Is that the same for the community? For my first dedicated sport watch this is finally a product I can reasonably buy from polar, the company most associated with sport and a good design!

    • @Dcrainmaker
      @Dcrainmaker  Месяц назад +1

      All other companies have the same features.

    • @grafzero0
      @grafzero0 Месяц назад

      Lack of full sync with TP is a huge disadvantage for me. Polar doesn't know how to do this si🤦🏻‍♂️nce years

    • @ryanmullins5085
      @ryanmullins5085 Месяц назад

      @@grafzero0they are adding in Q1 2025

  • @NeilMeyerowitz
    @NeilMeyerowitz Месяц назад +4

    Does this replace the pacer series or can we still expect an updated pacer/pro? Hoping for a MIP dual frequency pacer to come

  • @sergiogarcia8381
    @sergiogarcia8381 Месяц назад +2

    I see you're still enjoying Mallorca. I'm working right now very close to Magaluf. If you did not go I suggest you climbing (running) to the Galatzó mountain. One of the most beautiful and unique mountains in the south, next to the Calvià village. Have fun in the paradise!

  • @domenicoc9292
    @domenicoc9292 Месяц назад +1

    I seem to have understood that Polar M3, V3 and Grit 2 Pro are three sportwatches that have the same software functions and differ only in the case, dimensions and battery

  • @ManojSingh-ww9wm
    @ManojSingh-ww9wm Месяц назад +2

    Would be nice to know if all tests (walking test, fitness test, orthostatic test, leg recovery) are in the M3

    • @fibk
      @fibk Месяц назад

      Yes they are.

  • @nomoshiti
    @nomoshiti Месяц назад +3

    @dc rainmaker, how many of those new, every month introduced features you use?

  • @trummscott
    @trummscott Месяц назад +3

    Coming from the m2 you get a touchscreen with the m3.

  • @Myvoetisseer
    @Myvoetisseer Месяц назад +4

    I literally got my Forerunner 165 today please tell me I shouldn't have gone for this one

    • @pehuyghe
      @pehuyghe Месяц назад +3

      The forerunner 165 is a great watch. Good choice.

    • @Bjustis2222
      @Bjustis2222 Месяц назад +1

      Agree

  • @blakemorin9907
    @blakemorin9907 Месяц назад +1

    Hey! I’ve been wondering, after heavy use, do you notice scratches on the heart rate sensors of your Garmin watches? I tend to check mine, but I’m curious if you or other users even pay attention to it. Does it affect performance at all in your experience?

  • @grafzero0
    @grafzero0 Месяц назад +1

    Can you share open water training results with gps? My vantage M1 doesn't work good with that.

  • @MussabGasmelseed
    @MussabGasmelseed Месяц назад +1

    Heart rate accuracy look good even last graph for cycling for early one half hour

  • @jupitergirl9276
    @jupitergirl9276 13 дней назад

    Does this each have multiple interval timers? For example, 10 minutes on 1 minute rest?

  • @Tommy-vj7ox
    @Tommy-vj7ox Месяц назад

    is it possible to ZOOM IN on the screen with uploaded track's altitude graph?

  • @bocrux
    @bocrux Месяц назад +2

    No music on the phone is a deal breaker for me.

  • @AngHetz25
    @AngHetz25 15 дней назад

    Have they added the option for more than one alarm yet?

  • @archismansaha7660
    @archismansaha7660 5 дней назад

    which one would be better for triathlon, v3 or m3?

  • @Annililia
    @Annililia 12 дней назад

    Hi! I’ve been looking at Black Friday deals myself, and the Polar Ignite 3 caught my eye. Unfortunately, it doesn’t have an altimeter, which I’d need for hiking in Finland and abroad. What do you think about the Polar Vantage M3 and the Garmin Venu 3S? The Venu doesn’t have a map app, but the M3 does. I read that the M3 is otherwise a good sports watch, but apparently, the battery icon is always at the top and pops up automatically. There’s no option to disable it. Do you know anything about calibrating maps on the M3? Polar is apparently behind other brands like Garmin and Suunto.
    I have a narrow and slender wrist, 180mm. My hobbies are indoor climbing, swimming, badminton, cycling, and of course, hiking. :) Do you have any other watch recommendations, for example, from Garmin? My budget is max €400, preferably less if possible.

  • @mark.aldergrove
    @mark.aldergrove Месяц назад +1

    Coming from an older Polar watch, I'm looking to upgrade. The higher end Polar ones are contenders, but so is the latest Garmin Forerunner. I know there is a difference in price, but I'm really interested in the daily workouts. With my Polar model, I'm not impressed. Do you a have comparison of this particular fracture by any chance?

    • @devcreature4883
      @devcreature4883 Месяц назад +1

      I used to be a hardcore Polar fan. It ended with Polar pacer pro. Overall grat watch but the calories measurement was horrible. So, I have switched to Garmin Fenix 7 and I am glad I did it - it's ability to count reps and recognize workouts when I am in my gym is a lifesaver for me.
      Polar watches seems just outdated and if you are also a gym goer, than Fenix is a must have.

    • @mark.aldergrove
      @mark.aldergrove Месяц назад +1

      Ah, thanks! I'm mostly a runner but do need to venture into the gym more often. I have to confess the Fenix range is more than I'm willing to pay for a watch. I'm kind of hoping for a Forerunner 975 next spring though.

    • @HeatherCasparisM.D
      @HeatherCasparisM.D Месяц назад +1

      So today, after 3 wks (!) of searching after my Vantage M finally died, I purchased a Garmin Forerunner 965 😢

  • @BTman58
    @BTman58 2 дня назад

    I wish Polar would get rid of the inner ring around the display and make the screen larger.

  • @SY-ve5qm
    @SY-ve5qm Месяц назад

    I only really just need handful of core features on my watch? But I do care of firmware improvements and bug fixes. Does Polar have a good track records for long term software firmware updates actually?

  • @MoMoneih
    @MoMoneih 24 дня назад

    Thoughts on Polar Vantage M3 vs Suunto Race S vs Coros Pace Pro?

  • @czajuniapawulonik3148
    @czajuniapawulonik3148 Месяц назад +3

    Is there music on it or still a no go Polar?

    • @Dcrainmaker
      @Dcrainmaker  Месяц назад +1

      Nope

    • @czajuniapawulonik3148
      @czajuniapawulonik3148 Месяц назад +1

      @@Dcrainmaker Thanks. That's annoying, really.

    • @jeffreytillack4709
      @jeffreytillack4709 Месяц назад +1

      @@Dcrainmaker funny thing is, despite having an Apple Ultra, I barely use the music feature. Always have a phone on me so why bother? Then again, my Suunto's don't have music and I've never missed it. Each to their own I guess.

  • @m.g.6182
    @m.g.6182 Месяц назад

    Looks like the case of the Grit X pro?

  • @javarenas
    @javarenas Месяц назад

    Hello Mr @Dcrainmaker! Do you have a website where you recommend products? I love your reviews. But I’m torn about getting an old Apple Watch (se 2) or a new one, or waiting for the rumored se around the corner. All I really want is fitness tracking. I’m torn between just getting an Apple Watch, or getting something else that most likely will have some sort of monthly plan that ends up costing as much as an Apple Watch. 🤧😮‍💨

  • @josephf5036
    @josephf5036 Месяц назад

    What is the accuracy of this watch on open water swimming?

  • @ivonikolov8709
    @ivonikolov8709 Месяц назад

    Great Review😊
    I am currently looking at the Huawei GT5 Pro
    which has ECG and Arterial Stiffness Measurements.
    So wanted to ask which of the two is the better watch?
    Asking because You can get the GT5 Pro for £330 and the Vantage M3 for £350 here in The UK

  • @urdrenn
    @urdrenn Месяц назад +1

    polar vantage M3 vs 265 forerunner?

  • @soomad
    @soomad Месяц назад +2

    This feels like they have very limited resources to diversify their offering, so they are just reproducing the same thing with a different case so it only requires technical redesign.

  • @АлексейКоваленко-ш4з

    Are you going to test new Huawei watch gt 5 pro and Amazfit T Rex 3 comparing with Garmin, polar, Suunto? If no, then why?😊

  • @GustavoGarcia-pu5st
    @GustavoGarcia-pu5st Месяц назад

    Why the screen flickers?

    • @Dcrainmaker
      @Dcrainmaker  Месяц назад

      No idea why it's turning on and off. That just started the day before.

  • @Coockiejr
    @Coockiejr Месяц назад +2

    I can, in fact, not see that "big list" @ 10:33 :D

  • @rcuadro
    @rcuadro Месяц назад +8

    That screen blinking is so distracting that I resorted to listen to the video vice watching. Yikes

  • @JasonRaneses
    @JasonRaneses Месяц назад

    This might be the most uninspiring colorway I’ve seen in a while. Definitely would get the black.
    The Suunto Race S looks much better though at a lower price point.

    • @jeffreytillack4709
      @jeffreytillack4709 Месяц назад +1

      The Suunto Race S has (for me) been awesome. So many features including maps for so little. Garmin are just out of the ball park expensive now.

  • @eagle63-94
    @eagle63-94 Месяц назад

    Quand je vois la taille des boutons, je passe mon chemin. Car quand on chercher partout avec des gants où appuyer pour marquer ses laps, c'est fatigant

  • @newsnetworkz
    @newsnetworkz Месяц назад

    It seem GPS missing accuracy ( antenna matters 😂) and missing music (mp3) player are two big letdowns

  • @brankocibic3523
    @brankocibic3523 Месяц назад

    Huawei gt5 i gt 5 pro review?

  • @AndrewPerelson
    @AndrewPerelson Месяц назад +4

    My Garmin FR 265 is the same price with more features and more stable. So I can't imagine investing in this watch (buggy watch with not enough features). My first running watch was a Polar F7 and the only reason I even look at them now is for that nostalgia sake. Offline maps and navigation makes no difference to me because I don't use maps on my watch (can't see while running/cycling anyway)! I do use offline music & garmin pay & garmin's training programs.

  • @kirutrailic8227
    @kirutrailic8227 Месяц назад

    Polar updates are tragic! Shame this watch doesn't have running dynamics features, larger display, payment and bike radar compatibility...

  • @dirkheinrich2713
    @dirkheinrich2713 23 дня назад +1

    Frage, m3 oder suunto race s

    • @matsweriksson
      @matsweriksson 17 дней назад

      Yes! Who should get the money buring in my pocket ?!

  • @alexandrosel1131
    @alexandrosel1131 Месяц назад +4

    Without MIP display no buy for me. I want my watch display to stay always on without fancy gesturers to enable it the time i run. Yes, amoled is look impressive, but a watch intended for sports use is meant to show you some stats, not movies.

  • @paranoidandroid77
    @paranoidandroid77 Месяц назад

    Cannot move away from Garmin as apparently it is the only one supporting Ant+ and multiple sensors paired/connected at the same time, which is crucial for me. I'll get a 955 on Black Friday

  • @VirgilOvid
    @VirgilOvid Месяц назад +1

    Idk if we should pat them on the head for still trying or tell them to stop. This is so bad for a dedicated athlete focused smart watch. Just get a Garmin.

    • @jeffreytillack4709
      @jeffreytillack4709 Месяц назад +2

      Trouble is, who can longer afford the now ludicrous price of Garmins? Fine watches for sure, but they can't continue to gouge people like they're doing. Expect the competition to make huge inroads into their market share.

  • @krzysman82
    @krzysman82 Месяц назад +1

    Polar have the worse UI I had ever seen. Those icons, fonts, rings are ugly and they look like from 90’s. And the watch looks like diamond 💎 edition bezel for old school hip hop artist 😜

  • @jamesmc0716
    @jamesmc0716 Месяц назад +1

    Polar is not looking good.