I came up with some video suggestions that could work: - LGR loves to say 'farts' - DankPods loves to say "stinkin'" - DankPods loves to say 'nugget' - Lady Decade loves to say 'a necessity for gracious living'
@@waldolemmer Footage is NEVER a term video people use, it is a FILM term, why? Well film is measured in feet when it is manufactured and typically a film camera would run at 24 frames per second. Depending on the type of camera (8mm - 65mm) the usage of film would vary. For example a 8mm camera would consume 20 feet of film per minute where a 65mm camera would consume 112 feet per min. A typical 16mm camera would consume 36 feet per min. So when you do the math a 400 foot film magazine would hold: 20min for 8mm 11min for 16mm 3.5 min for 65mm So it was VERY important to know how much time was left on a film magazine to determine if you could re-shoot a scene of not. This is one reason you had to alert a director if you needed a magazine change as you DONT want to run out of film in the middle of a take. This is the reason they make 1000 FOOT 35mm film magazines for longer scenes shots. Video has no such limitations as you can run unlimited time as u can jist use 2 tape machines. As one is running low, you begin to record on another. As the second one is running you unload the 1st machine and place a new reel to record on when needed. You cant do that with film. You would need two cameras and at that you would get parallax errors. So, video never had those limitations and strictly went on time per reel ot in later times, timecode. Real video people go by scene/takes or simply time. I have been working with broadcast video tape since it was invented. We laugh at people who ise the term "footage" in video amd just think "here is another film School student" If you want to be respected in video, use the right terms
There is no such thing as "footage" when it comes to video. That term is only used for film. I have been working with broadcast video tape since its invention. We laugh at anyone using the term "footage" as we say "there goes another film student" I challenge ANYONE to show me a footage counter on video. They are called clips in modern say, or segments back in the day. They were ALWAYS identified either a take number or by time into a reel, or later days by Timecode. Do you see a "footage" counter on ANY video editor? Please stop making yourself look like a noob by using this film only term. It makes the pros cringe. Use professional terms and stop being laughed at.
![Diggy Graves - Red Vineyard [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8Ro085T0mnQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Footage doesn't sound like a real word anymore.
He loves his footage so much that he "loses" it so he can enjoy it all for himself 👌
I came up with some video suggestions that could work:
- LGR loves to say 'farts'
- DankPods loves to say "stinkin'"
- DankPods loves to say 'nugget'
- Lady Decade loves to say 'a necessity for gracious living'
Excellent suggestions! Thanks
t.co/nqO3qMEOx7
when he said he 'loses the footage' it is always 'somehow' not like his 40 something year old memory cannot serve him properly
his brain has been destroyed by huffing straight RetroBrite Fumes and solder smoke
Get this man his footage!! I love the 8 bit guy, ive watched him for years and he only lives like an hour from me.
I can't figure out if he likes footage because he keeps taking it, or if he hates footage because it keeps getting lost.
If I were that clumsy / forgetful, someone would be placing their footage up my backside.
RGT85 loves to say “system”
Showing his age since no one THESE days knows that FOOTAGE refers to the length of FILM the video was recorded on.
Hahaha i love the way you mix up video and film terms. Video has no "footage" term associated with it, never has.
Haha...brilliant.
And there's so many feet of film that get lost; so expensive.
Is that why it's called footage?
@@waldolemmer
Footage is NEVER a term video people use, it is a FILM term, why?
Well film is measured in feet when it is manufactured and typically a film camera would run at 24 frames per second. Depending on the type of camera (8mm - 65mm) the usage of film would vary. For example a 8mm camera would consume 20 feet of film per minute where a 65mm camera would consume 112 feet per min. A typical 16mm camera would consume 36 feet per min. So when you do the math a 400 foot film magazine would hold:
20min for 8mm
11min for 16mm
3.5 min for 65mm
So it was VERY important to know how much time was left on a film magazine to determine if you could re-shoot a scene of not. This is one reason you had to alert a director if you needed a magazine change as you DONT want to run out of film in the middle of a take.
This is the reason they make 1000 FOOT 35mm film magazines for longer scenes shots.
Video has no such limitations as you can run unlimited time as u can jist use 2 tape machines. As one is running low, you begin to record on another. As the second one is running you unload the 1st machine and place a new reel to record on when needed. You cant do that with film. You would need two cameras and at that you would get parallax errors.
So, video never had those limitations and strictly went on time per reel ot in later times, timecode.
Real video people go by scene/takes or simply time.
I have been working with broadcast video tape since it was invented.
We laugh at people who ise the term "footage" in video amd just think "here is another film School student"
If you want to be respected in video, use the right terms
@@waldolemmer Yup. The term used to describe how much (physical film and length of time) video was captured or played---"by the foot" (12 inches)
He is always losing footage
Fr
What a footage
how does this only have 10 viewss?!
Share and spread, my friend
@@lovestosay id love to but I can't I cancelled all my friendships so I could spend more time watching youtube content.
Great footage :)
Is this why there's no good UFO footage?
LOL
He also likes calling people who give him their money "armchair experts"
There is no such thing as "footage" when it comes to video. That term is only used for film.
I have been working with broadcast video tape since its invention. We laugh at anyone using the term "footage" as we say "there goes another film student"
I challenge ANYONE to show me a footage counter on video.
They are called clips in modern say, or segments back in the day. They were ALWAYS identified either a take number or by time into a reel, or later days by Timecode. Do you see a "footage" counter on ANY video editor?
Please stop making yourself look like a noob by using this film only term. It makes the pros cringe. Use professional terms and stop being laughed at.