I imagine how eager Lizst would be to play the songs for Organ that Bach’s composed to make his own arrangement for piano. Thanks for this rendition with scores.
Yes, Liszt was always eager to take credit for other people's compositions. Paganini, Schubert, Mozart, Beethoven, Bach & several opera composers had Liszt riding their coattails until he got to his late 30s.
La interpretación de Amaral Vieira ha sido fuego al alma y a la mente cual concimiento del alma de Bach pasando por las furias y la nebulosidaded de Liszt.
Bach’s BWV 548 with sheet music for comparison: ruclips.net/video/Pfnkz1cFp8g/видео.html It’s fascinating to see how far Liszt will push technique compared to Bach, and interesting how Liszt chooses to both capture the spirit of the organ on piano while also carving out a distinctive feel to the piece in its own right.
B R A V O !!!!!! I had only heard the Alexis Weissenberg recording of this and rarely elsewhere. A magnificent performance, beautiful clarity of every line in spite of its great complexity. A total artistic experience. Thank you
Utterly matchless!! Comparable to the one Kaikhosru Sorabji featured some days ago. I'm sure Liszt enjoyed performing it for his audiences. Glenn Gould would never have played this arrangement of Bach's P. & F' s. He only liked the one of Beethoven's 5th symphony. Possibly the only thing he did like by Liszt. As a pianist, why on earth wouldn't you want to tackle this great excercise in fingers and technique. You can hear the Organ all over the place here.
Once again, it ain't what you got but what you do with it that counts. Fugue must have simple subjects. But what Bach does with this one is so fantastic & dramatic. Of course, Liszt's treatment only adds to it.
Interesting how the fugue doesn’t have the Picardy third ending on major, but the prelude does. I’m still confused if Liszt or Bach wrote no Picardy third?
Liszt has been reported to have been a supreme interpreter of Beethoven`s and Bach`s piano music. And, not to forget, of Bach`s organ music. He wrote the piano adaptations of the Preludes and Fugues for organ in order BWV 543-548 to be able to play them at his piano recitals.
Compare this to a real version of BWV 543: ruclips.net/video/pQiZG9rqS1k/видео.htmlsi=dLLvPG8v3D6eGU40 This piano transcription sounds like Bach, as written by Czerny into his _Pianistengeläufigkeitsschule._ Composers, even Baroque ones, had the timbres of particular instruments in mind when they wrote, and those who have done post-Baroque transcriptions have too often not taken that into account, erroneously declaiming that, "Oh, those Baroque guys would just play on anything they had to hand." Such transcriptions from organ works are frowned upon now. With the richness of its choices of sonority, it makes more musical sense to transcribe _for_ organ rather than doing a piano reduction of its music.
@Alberto Sousa Music is meant to be criticed. Especially when it is not your own. They don't have to post their own interpretation to not agree with this one. That's why music is so personal to people. Please don't go testing people with different ideas. I'm sure a respected tenor would know such a thing.
@@ki11card25 No, do music critiques when you’ve paid for a ticket, or at least when you’ve got something to show for yourself. Or at least a photo of your face. Otherwise, you’re not being a critic, you’re being a troll. That’s what this respected tenor thinks.
@Alberto Sousa When you release music to the world. It's open for critique. It's truly deplorable that you would gatekeep music and personal opinions on performance. If you even look at this piece and it's history you would know how Bach wrote it for organ and is meant to be voiced with certain touch. And before you assume anything about my character. Yes. I am a pianist, I play Bach commonly, in fact I'm currently learning to play Liszts/Bachs Weinen Klagen Sorgen Zagen and it requires so much technique to get both Liszt and Bachs styles in a piece. It's absolutely shameful that people of your caliber would tarnish the beauty of interpretation and music.
I think that playing the pedal parts in octaves is just too much. It requires using the sustain pedal, which adds to making the whole thing muddy. I think the single lowest bass note would be plenty, and be more organistic (not muddy), and more pianistic, more legato, and less virtuosic, and match the treble better. It's a naive listener who thinks that when the tune comes in on the pedal, it needs to drown everything else out. We all know that Liszt was kind of over the top anyway. Why not improve him? He's not God. He's more like Liberace.
Well, it was Liszt giving this rendition to Bach. In Arts any improvement, if able to do so to the perfect-imperfection of an artist leads to a new Art. There is no such idea of improving in arts. There is only new arts. That is what Liszt did. That is what you would commit, whether sinfully or not, terminating with creating your art. Of course, then, it remains the recognition of it, which is yet another artz itself.
Thanks for the chuckle. I think of Liberace as Liszt for the masses. Your "kind of over the top" was perfect, leaving room for people like me who, call me cornball, love his kind of "over the top".
@@painetcirque5695 Should we just call it new Artz, then? It happens all the time. Art is a collaboration between composer and performer. They are both artists. Performers change dynamics, tempo, instruments. Surely a few notes with the same letter names are not off the table? Or keyboard?
Ce n'est pas à 100% fidèle à la version originale. pour orgue , On n'a pas l'impression d'entendre exactement le même morceau, Ça reste mieux de l'écouter à l'orgue
I imagine how eager Lizst would be to play the songs for Organ that Bach’s composed to make his own arrangement for piano. Thanks for this rendition with scores.
Yes, Liszt was always eager to take credit for other people's compositions. Paganini, Schubert, Mozart, Beethoven, Bach & several opera composers had Liszt riding their coattails until he got to his late 30s.
This is not a song ffs!
PIECES
@@tirthankardasgupta8359 U mad bro?
@@lucasrct i am not mad but I am sick of people calling classical pieces as "songs". Peace
i love them beginning of the fugue so much, the theme is perfect
Is the force of the circle of fiths！
Il s'agit du prélude et fugue BWV 543 transcrit par Liszt
Bach is eternal. Liszt is the man! Danka!
Божественная музыка! .. Вечная любовь - наслаждения и страдания...!!! Радость встречи и тяжесть расставания!!..
La interpretación de Amaral Vieira ha sido fuego al alma y a la mente cual concimiento del alma de Bach pasando por las furias y la nebulosidaded de Liszt.
Bach’s BWV 548 with sheet music for comparison: ruclips.net/video/Pfnkz1cFp8g/видео.html
It’s fascinating to see how far Liszt will push technique compared to Bach, and interesting how Liszt chooses to both capture the spirit of the organ on piano while also carving out a distinctive feel to the piece in its own right.
Thé score for piano is so difficult, Liszt of course ! Very interesting ! The performance by the pianist is perfect !
An absolutely awesome transcription for piano! It just had to be Liszt with those octave passages! Super!😊
This is my favorite Bach prelude and fugue.
B R A V O !!!!!! I had only heard the Alexis Weissenberg recording of this and rarely elsewhere. A magnificent performance, beautiful clarity of every line in spite of its great complexity. A total artistic experience. Thank you
Thank you for the commentary! Amaral Vieira is certainly one of a kind
Utterly matchless!! Comparable to the one Kaikhosru Sorabji featured some days ago. I'm sure Liszt enjoyed performing it for his audiences. Glenn Gould would never have played this arrangement of Bach's P. & F' s. He only liked the one of Beethoven's 5th symphony. Possibly the only thing he did like by Liszt. As a pianist, why on earth wouldn't you want to tackle this great excercise in fingers and technique. You can hear the Organ all over the place here.
Невероятно, музыка бесконечности, совершенство❤исполнение настолько проникновенно, что слезы на глазах❤️
Играл это произведение, очень люблю его, спасибо! Прекрасное исполнение!
Once again, it ain't what you got but what you do with it that counts. Fugue must have simple subjects. But what Bach does with this one is so fantastic & dramatic. Of course, Liszt's treatment only adds to it.
Лежу зараз хвора в ліжку, це мої ЛІКИ❤ я скоро одужаю❤ ця музика прекрасна ❤животворна, та, що зціляє❤❤❤❤
дякую за коментар! Музика завжди найкращі ліки, все буде добре, щасливого одужання❤
Дякую ❤
Потрясающе!
Magnifique prodigieux.Merci.Cordialement
Olivier
Très belle pièce
So cinematic! You bring it to life. It could jump into someone's lap, rip open a pillow, act innocent, stare at food!
Is your opinion of the piece or about a dog you know? 🤔
#woof
@@ltrizzle12 Yes.
I'm gonna play until 1:17, write my own ending to make that the end, then just play it as if that's the whole piece so it's easy enough for me.
Loving all those Amaral Vieira's Liszt renditions.
The Bach classification for the original organ piece is BWV543.
El final es muy épico, gracias por subir esto
7:05 As to me it is the most beautiful place
Вечно юный и гениальный не постижимый Бах. Не ручей а море -имя ему.
Um oceano...
Bravoooo
perfect
It`s absolutely beautiful 🙂
Very good.
Thanks for uploading!
Maravilhoso!
Wonderful piece, thank you for uploading it.
Thanks for sharing 🎹
This is very beautiful music
Wonderful l have no words to describe it.this is a piece l d like to learn to play
Muito bom
Such a genius
How do they hold the lower bass notes while playing on a piano and not an organ?
Sostenuto pedal (middle one) let's you sustain selective notes
¡Muy buena pregunta!
@@mackenzietang6908 Pero ese pedal ya existía en la epoca de Liszt?
@@ruperttmls7985 The middle pedal has been around since 1874. Liszt died in 1886.
Brilliant
Genijalno, savršenstvo
I never heard this before. It's wonderful! Edit - I have heard the fugue but not the prelude.
Weird; the prelude is considerably more famous and iconic than the fugue.
You might enjoy the Gerubach scrolling organ score for this as well then!
Geniales.
Beautiful
Most interesting. Now I want to go and hear how it sounds in the original. It would have been nice to be given the BWV number of the original work.
BWV 543
@@RachmaninoffOp.18 Thank you!
ruclips.net/video/Pfnkz1cFp8g/видео.html
the Gerubach scrolling score is a pretty good one.
Rachmaninoff was visibly influenced by Bachs preludes this prelude in particular.
I am speechless!❤❤❤
4:48
0:38 sounds like the westword theme
Yeah I thought so too
❤❤
La verdad en órgano se escucha impresionante. Aunque el piano no se queda atrás.
Wow ❤💯
Lundo demais.
8:53
Interesting how the fugue doesn’t have the Picardy third ending on major, but the prelude does. I’m still confused if Liszt or Bach wrote no Picardy third?
How do you know that
this reminds me of Heroes Of Might And Magic III Soundtrack - Inferno Town.
Bach and liszt???
Yes.
It was composed for organ, so liszt adapted it for piano
Liszt has been reported to have been a supreme interpreter of Beethoven`s and Bach`s piano music. And, not to forget, of Bach`s organ music. He wrote the piano adaptations of the Preludes and Fugues for organ in order BWV 543-548 to be able to play them at his piano recitals.
they were best buds, went to high school together
@@hello-rq8kf Different century🤣
Himmlisch ❤
Музыка небожителей
Está severo
🎶🎶🎶🎶
hm. why use the dynamic available on the piano...
ikr? 😂
"noo! how dare you play a piano transcription like that! you must simulate an organ!" haha
Compare this to a real version of BWV 543: ruclips.net/video/pQiZG9rqS1k/видео.htmlsi=dLLvPG8v3D6eGU40 This piano transcription sounds like Bach, as written by Czerny into his _Pianistengeläufigkeitsschule._ Composers, even Baroque ones, had the timbres of particular instruments in mind when they wrote, and those who have done post-Baroque transcriptions have too often not taken that into account, erroneously declaiming that, "Oh, those Baroque guys would just play on anything they had to hand." Such transcriptions from organ works are frowned upon now. With the richness of its choices of sonority, it makes more musical sense to transcribe _for_ organ rather than doing a piano reduction of its music.
I’m confused is it Bach or Liszt? Prelude certainly sounds like Bach
The original work is by Bach; we listen here to a transcription for piano by Liszt.
Yes, Liszt transcribed a few of Bach's Organ works for Piano
Bien pour travailler ses gammes
L ho studiata....😅
Westworld theme - anyone?
it,s like chopin prelude
The fugue is too romantic.
Agreed. The prelude also has bad voicing.
Oh ok, please post a video with the correct interpretation then.
@Alberto Sousa Music is meant to be criticed. Especially when it is not your own. They don't have to post their own interpretation to not agree with this one. That's why music is so personal to people. Please don't go testing people with different ideas.
I'm sure a respected tenor would know such a thing.
@@ki11card25 No, do music critiques when you’ve paid for a ticket, or at least when you’ve got something to show for yourself. Or at least a photo of your face. Otherwise, you’re not being a critic, you’re being a troll.
That’s what this respected tenor thinks.
@Alberto Sousa When you release music to the world. It's open for critique. It's truly deplorable that you would gatekeep music and personal opinions on performance. If you even look at this piece and it's history you would know how Bach wrote it for organ and is meant to be voiced with certain touch.
And before you assume anything about my character. Yes. I am a pianist, I play Bach commonly, in fact I'm currently learning to play Liszts/Bachs Weinen Klagen Sorgen Zagen and it requires so much technique to get both Liszt and Bachs styles in a piece.
It's absolutely shameful that people of your caliber would tarnish the beauty of interpretation and music.
I think that playing the pedal parts in octaves is just too much. It requires using the sustain pedal, which adds to making the whole thing muddy. I think the single lowest bass note would be plenty, and be more organistic (not muddy), and more pianistic, more legato, and less virtuosic, and match the treble better. It's a naive listener who thinks that when the tune comes in on the pedal, it needs to drown everything else out. We all know that Liszt was kind of over the top anyway. Why not improve him? He's not God. He's more like Liberace.
Well, it was Liszt giving this rendition to Bach. In Arts any improvement, if able to do so to the perfect-imperfection of an artist leads to a new Art. There is no such idea of improving in arts. There is only new arts. That is what Liszt did. That is what you would commit, whether sinfully or not, terminating with creating your art. Of course, then, it remains the recognition of it, which is yet another artz itself.
Thanks for the chuckle. I think of Liberace as Liszt for the masses. Your "kind of over the top" was perfect, leaving room for people like me who, call me cornball, love his kind of "over the top".
@@painetcirque5695 Should we just call it new Artz, then? It happens all the time. Art is a collaboration between composer and performer. They are both artists. Performers change dynamics, tempo, instruments. Surely a few notes with the same letter names are not off the table? Or keyboard?
Ce n'est pas à 100% fidèle à la version originale. pour orgue , On n'a pas l'impression d'entendre exactement le même morceau, Ça reste mieux de l'écouter à l'orgue
Tu peux détailler ce que tu n'aimes pas dans cette version stp ?
4:53
❤❤