The Rise of Joseph McCarthy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 31

  • @mikaylasmith811
    @mikaylasmith811 3 года назад +5

    This is perfect for tomorrow's lesson on the Red Scare and McCarthyism. Thank you so much!

    • @historyforhumans905
      @historyforhumans905  3 года назад +1

      Just in time! Glad you enjoyed it. :)

    • @BGNOLA
      @BGNOLA 3 года назад

      It wasn't a "scare"; there really were reds.

  • @gstrummer
    @gstrummer 3 года назад +2

    Great stuff. Love this.

  • @reinfeddedewolff5565
    @reinfeddedewolff5565 Год назад

    🌟THANK YOU
    VERY MUCH👏
    FOR THIS
    🇺🇲
    US HISTORY🌟PRESENTATION AS SUCH🇺🇲.

  • @clone0332
    @clone0332 2 года назад

    Where did the get the Ronald Reagan quote at 6:14 from?

    • @historyforhumans905
      @historyforhumans905  2 года назад

      From LOC- look up primary source + Reagan testimony before HUAC. Its a great statement on American democracy and civil liberties :)

  • @chrisashleylewer5914
    @chrisashleylewer5914 3 года назад +1

    Some great zingers in there!

  • @twown
    @twown 11 месяцев назад

    You lost me at "incredulous accusations." An accusation cannot be incredulous. Only people can believe or disbelieve.

    • @historyforhumans905
      @historyforhumans905  11 месяцев назад

      Hence my commentary. Most historians find the accusations I was referring to incredulous.

    • @twown
      @twown 11 месяцев назад

      @@historyforhumans905 No. You're still saying that the accusations themselves are incredulous (in the eyes of the historians). That's wrong. The historians are incredulous over the accusations. Only people can be incredulous. You can't FIND accusations to be incredulous. That's like finding accusations to be surprised. Accusations can't be surprised. They can only be surprising. PEOPLE are surprised. Am I making sense? I'm trying to help.

    • @travisbickle9357
      @travisbickle9357 6 месяцев назад

      @@twown ​ @twown Oh jeez, semantics. Lighten up, Francis.

  • @marktaylor4496
    @marktaylor4496 4 месяца назад

    Sounds like trump and his gang on the Hill today.

  • @michaelgriffith5566
    @michaelgriffith5566 2 года назад +3

    This is a very misleading, one-sided video. Viewers should read the other side of the story. McCarthy was not a demagogue. Read M. Stanton Evans' book BLACKLISTED BY HISTORY.

    • @historyforhumans905
      @historyforhumans905  2 года назад +1

      He was indeed a dangerous demagogue and a scoundrel. In the video I do cover how there were also Soviet spies that had infiltrated some high levels of government but it does not change the fact that McCarthy was a bombastic and reckless media hound that did not represent American ideals. Thats the opinion of the author and general history. If you can look at his actions and give a thumbs up- thats your prerogative.

    • @pinochetrevivalist7374
      @pinochetrevivalist7374 10 месяцев назад

      Agreed. Demagogue? No more than very many politicians today. McCarthy was at least right about communist infiltration of the US government as should be painfully obvious in hindsight in light of the world we now live in in the west. People who oppose the prevailing narrative are smeared and lose their jobs and the courts are weaponized to railroad dissidents of the globalist tyranny agenda. Our monuments are being destroyed and our history is rewritten or memory holed. Wokism is the state ideology today and it is Marxism re-engineered for the 21st century by communists controlling our institutions and media.