Neuroscience and Society Series: Creativity, Genius and the Brain

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 ноя 2015
  • Scientists often cite Isaac Newton when crediting the work of others who have come before them: If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants. Who are those “giants”? We know they are not limited to the sciences. Music has them. So does art. As well as literature. Do these giants possess the characteristics of genius and creativity in larger doses than the rest of us? What makes a genius? Why are some people so much more creative than others? How do people “become” creative or a genius? What influence do brain and environment have in developing and nurturing genius or creativity? These and other questions are the focus of this public event. Speakers addressed circumstances necessary to produce a cultural environment that nurtures creativity; the role of epiphanies in the creative thinking process; and how science can contribute to enhanced creativity.
    Presenters:
    Nancy Andreasen, M.D., Ph.D.
    Andrew H. Woods Chair of Psychiatry, University of Iowa College of Medicine
    John Kounios, Ph.D.
    Professor of Psychology, Drexel University
    Roberta B. Ness, M.D., M.P.H.
    Rockwell Professor of Public Health, Vice President for Innovation
    The University of Texas School of Public Health

Комментарии • 10

  • @Elle-ht3km
    @Elle-ht3km 2 года назад +3

    She's such an amazing speaker

  • @mpcc2022
    @mpcc2022 7 лет назад +10

    The first speaker makes the assumption that Leonardo was a polymath his entire life which is false. Yes, there is no question he manifested and developed astonishing abilities in differing fields as he began his independent work from under Verrocchio, but he was trained with rigor as a painter an sculptor. It was a specialized trade that Leonardo received from Verrocchio not some scholastic education under a model of standardized testing. My point is that these are not comparable in so far as they're not the same things, and the polymath ideologist seem to ignore that profound skill doesn't just emerge, and that some skills have greater universal utility inherent to them which make the spine of the skills for the specified domain of knowledge. The specific is a subset of the general. Education has many issues, but I don't believe that it's issues stem from a profound emphasis on excellence in a specific domain of knowledge, and that individual's know so much about their subject that they become one-sided living encyclopedic texts that are so robust that they're inert creatives.

  • @user-lj7iw5nt9f
    @user-lj7iw5nt9f 2 месяца назад

    Im creative and i was diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder. I notice things that others don't.

  • @darwinlaluna3677
    @darwinlaluna3677 Год назад +1

    That was my life , and that is true!

  • @darwinlaluna3677
    @darwinlaluna3677 Год назад +2

    How about me, nurture? They nurtured me by struggling,painful, suffering, hated, ppl made me, what is the difference between AI ROBOT AND ME,? Maybe ppl forget that I AM human too, and i have feelings aswell

  • @achatinaslak742
    @achatinaslak742 Год назад

    I have a question...which of Darwin Laluna s four comments is the fittest? LOL.

  • @ryans9015
    @ryans9015 Год назад

    46:33

  • @darwinlaluna3677
    @darwinlaluna3677 Год назад

    No u don’t have, maybe i am creative but i an not a liar

  • @darwinlaluna3677
    @darwinlaluna3677 Год назад

    Then u don’t have to continue ur experiment and. I AM NO A LIAR