Do people really care anymore, We have William and Kates children and they like all parents love to show them to the world and we love them for it. Thank you Neil 😊 💓
Mabel, I don't think there's anyone who isn't. All the uncomfortable audience wants is to see the train wreck when it happens. It's greatly anticipated IMHO.
Meghan looks 15 years younger if not more in the picture where she is holding the baby in the b & w photo. Why is the baby sitting by itself? I am tired of Meghan and Harry's games. I feel really sorry for Harry for how he has ruined his life and pushed his family away. He needs to be rescued and be humble and swallow his pride.
The other woman is holding Meghan's child - surely. They are holding each other's children! The one Meghan is holding does look like the other woman as someone commented and Meghan's baby in is the other woman's arms! Look! She looks like Meghan, NOT the woman holding her!! My word!! WHO DOES THAT!?? Only Meghan, surely. She tricked the other woman into it, to get this photo, then lie about who her own baby is?? Surely not!!?? 😢
Adorable child but not Methanes, where’s Archie and the rest of the party guest’s. How did Methane manage to loose 20+ pounds her teeth altered nose job and look 20 years younger all in 24 hour’s??
@@journeysintothelight2133 Yes she is; just take a walk backward; go back to trooping of color 6 years ago; you will see adorable one year old in that picture.
Any person that studies genetics will tell you the odds of two children having red hair when the one parent has dominant African American hair is nearly zero . Who are they kidding .
Yes! Also, black (Megs natural hair color) is a dominant hair color….. How in the world they both have red hair? The mother must have red hair as well!?!😜
@@Green-ie1dn my mum suggested that they photoshop the hair colour as a ploy so kids don’t get recognised out and about- as everyone would be looking for little red heads not dark haired children. Good theory but not sure 😊
I think people don’t care because if you don’t care to show your child then people will also not care to see your child. I hate when people show picture of only their child feet, hands etc. every child has a right to privacy but teasing picture comes off as also being insulting to the public. I like how William and Kate are very protective of their children but for special occasions they show their full face.
Neil this can't be Lili this child is about 18 months old there was one photo with the queen as they never bought the kids. According to airport staff there were no children with them allegedly. All smoke and mirrors then going back to us saying the brf snubbed Lili were they not busy with the jubilee so their child is more important than the queen really WHat.
I didn’t see any kids in the car when the window went down. We’re they in another car? That kid, Lili is big for her age with lots of teeth so she’d be in a bigger car seat and maybe want to sit next to her Mum?
@@johnmead8437 I wonder if that’s why she hid the children because they were too white. My cousin’s family is mixed race, and one child is a very fair skinned,red head with green eyes. Of his 4 kids they are all really different. But no one has commented on why Meghan shared the photo of her photographer’s mixed race kids at the same time. I can’t put my finger on what she is trying to say.
@@sunflower7532 the photographer is black and his wife is white - their children are mixed. M is playing with us by saying her children should look more like them but they don't...
Of course there is something fishy about that picture, isn’t there always with those two? There is always so much drama , they are tiring! Can’t they just act like normal people, I’m so sick of the sight of them and their antics. Go Away! Live your life!
Even more possible with gene selection available during ivf. It's can't be used for skin colour per se. However if used to select eye color,eg blue, chances are the child will be fair skinned.
There was no birthday party. No kids were brought with them. How could there be? The child in the pic is older than just 1 year. Too many teeth. Never released a pic of Archie that way. WHY NOT? JMO
Thanks Neil. Lili is older than 12 mths, strange pic taken by a so called 'professional' photographer with no legs and dress ballooning around her. The pic of Meghan is definitely an old one, features including nose and chin were before cosmetic surgery, also much slimmer. Why wasn't Archie and Harry in the shots rather than the photographer and his family. Classic, smoke and mirrors.
Megnut's teeth are completely different and the other little girl's arm is missing! Definitely a fake photo and I hope it is being forensically examined.
It is being said that the picture is Meghan before plastic surgery. It definitely is odd. Why a picture with a friends child but none of Harry or Archie? As always, the plot thickens. It is guaranteed to cause a lot of talk keeping them in the public eye.
and did she get permission to put out a picture of another child? She was soon be at the lawyer's if anybody put out a picture of her child (wait, she already did that).
Have a look of a newborn doll called, Lila. Especially one where she wears little blue shorts. Someone else tipped me off in some comments and I googled it. Looks exactly the same. That’s why it looks so lifeless.
She often goes in for filler plumping before big events, I wrote before hand to expect a ballooned appearance! Then over time it’ll deflate again, until the next filler. This time also layers of bronzer, missing the ear and temple area.
Well Neil they Definatley tried to over shadow Louie. That’s not a recent picture. She lost 20 pounds in a day plus many other things I can’t bother to mention. Their irrelevant now.
yes -- and her hair color changed a bit between her appearance at St Pauls and then in the pic of her and Lili. its not a drastic difference but still significant enough
If they cared at ALL ABOUT THOSE KIDS they wouldn’t get rid of EVERY SINGLE FAMILY MEMBER SO THE KIDS GROW UP IN SOLITUDE.. Family is so important for so many reasons and these kids are basically orphans with 2 psychotic narcissistic parents.. 😂
Well, after their catastrophic jubilee (as everything is about them), they have to prove to their sponsors that they are tabloidly alive. So in order to counter the wave created by Louis, they releases this picture. There are a lot of common points between Megan and Amber, for both of them, everything and everyone should orbit around them and they do know the truth. Both are despicable.
That is an adorable baby but, she is definitely not just turning one. She is older. I have been working in the early childhood development field for 25+ yrs. and if you're a parent you would also know this but, no one year old has a mouth full of teeth. They have 2 possibly 4. They may have a couple that are breaking out along the jawline. They are still in the teething phase and they will usually have their full set of baby teeth by the age of 3. This baby has more teeth then she should for a one yr. old. She is a cutie though!
The picture taken in December Lillibet had very little hair. Amazing how fast her hair grew but also how big she is for a 1 year old. Why wasn't Archie in that same picture with his sister and mom?
@@laineymcd4074 being born with teeth is extremely rare and it’s usually the bottom teeth. Having said that, my oldest did cut 4 upper teeth at once. That was rough on her (and us) But honestly that child looks older and M looks YOUNGER in that B&W photo!
Everything the Harkles do is odd. I’m more worried what Pearl’s gonna do after feeling so dismissed, disrespected, and most of all, Charles blowing a 😘 too Catherine...Buckle up
@@lindah5011 Pearl is the name of that silly show Meghan was going to put out by Netflix. Netflix dropped the project though. The character in the show "pearl" is supposed to be based on Meghan as a young girl who travels through time meeting famous women in history.
I have been looking at all the fuss made of the release of Lilibet pictures. Something doesn't smell right about the pictures. In the black and white photo taken of Meghan with Camillia Harriman, that child who they call Lilibet looks the spitting image of this friend Camillia. Meghan also looks so much younger , not as cosmetically altered as she is now. Megan was also very tan at the church service and in the window at BP. If that child is Lilibet, I doubt she is from Meghan. Only 1-2% of the world population are gingers. Black hair and brown eyes are 70% more dominate than light hair and red is a recessive gene and both parents would have to have one and yet we are led to believe H&M have two out of two. Only 17% of world population have blue eyes. Wasn't Archie passed off as ginger and blue eyed? You can't tell me that nothing of Meghan's genes got into to those children's gene pools. Also I found it very strange that these people, Misan and Camillia Harriman, were not mentioned in any of the articles as gusts (until now) at this "party" for the birthday. However the ones that were mentioned over and over again are not in any photos and not even Archie or Harry? Oh , and now there are articles saying that the queen would not allow photos and then she did allow but the pictures were kept with the queen? Always mysteries and nothing can be verified. We are always supposed to rely on faith in the biggest liars, the press and Harry and Meghan. There is a HUGE CON going on. The public has been suckered.
Simply stated this was a 21st Century attempt to undermine the Monarchy using this well scripted ruse to claim the Throne?? Well, now that MM has the title of Duchess. Perhaps, we need to roll back the "film" and start from the beginning so as to reveal the "scripted plot" regarding MM seeking a royal name, trading off the name, and to do that she required a genuine royal Prince, (Harry), to be her "co-star". The heart of a woman/man who is intent on attaining a super star persona, is required to study their role so well as to "become" their character and to reflect their character so naturally that they themselves disappears. MM study the films and videos of Princess Dianna, that would have included Harry as a baby, toddler, young child and into adulthood whereas Prince Harry met MM as he did with no prior knowledge of her life. Big difference. Harry has been swindled. Unconsciously, Harry was drawn to the older woman in MM, yet she most craftily played her cards until she obtained a Royal Flush.
As a Mum, I had three children, twins + one, if I ever spoke about them I always referred to all three, never just one. I don't know what it is, but something is not right.
That reminds me of Michael J. Fox going home to his parents for a visit and he gave them an award he had won for acting. He said the next morning he got up and there beside it, his mother had placed a sports event trophy of his sibling 😊...keeping it equal. Being a stable individual he found it funny and repeated the story in a few interviews. Sorry for digressing, I just thought it was cute and most parents can relate to it...I know I can. 😄.
I agree and I don’t know what it is exactly but something is very off with these people. It’s not just one thing, it’s almost everything. If you genuinely came to have your grandmother meet your daughter, why did you pick the Jubilee to come over, knowing full well your whole family would be extremely busy. Why not come say a week before ( and stay for the festivities of course ) or stay an extra week after everything had quieted down. That birthday party would be considered tone deaf knowing nobody would be free to attend. A one yo would never know the difference if you didn’t celebrate on the actual date. Heck a one yo will have zero memory of the day ! It just doesn’t add up. The two photos released are very odd. You’d think they could have at least appeared publicly once like a normal family of 4 just to shut the cynics but noooooo. I don’t know if that’s their way of keeping the mystery and therefore the interest alive ? Everything is drama with them 🤦♀️
@@Booboonancy Nancy, a normal loving family would include their son, and you're right, no one would hold a party on the 4th June, knowing everyone's unavailable. Everything about them isn't right, extremely unhealthy.
People on twitter and you tube are saying she is 14 month old Rebecca Cord, granddaughter of the gardener at Montecito. Others think she photoshopped a picture of August or even Harry. Child looks too old and has too many teeth for 1. It is very odd to pair this with an obviously old black and white picture of the wife holding yet another mystery child, or maybe photoshopped child. And no evidence they were even in England. There have just been too many lies, too much mysteriously unavailable info, and too many inconsistencies in photos, stories to believe anything they put out.
Hi Neil I agree a lot of mystery round the children and whatever it’s those children we feel sorry for regards and I do believe that that picture was put out at the wrong time,with all the mystery surrounding theses children most have given up on knowing anything about them…William and Catherine have always shared there childrens growth and we love them for that …have a wonderful day Neil
According to Celt Views, the ground workers claimed that there were no children with them on arrival and also going back. I wonder why she didn't have a curly hair like her mother
There is something very wrong here. That picture they released is the exact picture her friend has on her insta with her family trip to Italy . Unless the children are identical matching hair and dresses . I was in shock when I saw this same picture on markles friends story . They didn't even bother to tweak it a little .
I think the child looks older than one year old. I also wonder if anyone turned up to the garden party. The cake doesn’t look very kiddie friendly. Perhaps that’s why they escaped because it was one disaster after the other. Nice tie, Neil
On Archie's 1st birthday, that one was weird too, the kid looked to be much older, there were no balloons, no children, no Harry, no cake, no presents. There was an american guy with her taking their photo ,no british accent so it wasn't Harry. All psychics/tarot readers said it wasn't Archie at all.
YES !! and the teeth !! Most (children) have between TWO and FOUR teeth by the time they're one year old. Eventually, at around age two and a half, most children will have all of their 20 baby teeth"
Her chin is different, her nose is drastically different, her teeth shape is different, not to mention she's at least 30lbs lighter in the black and white photo. Absolutely photoshopped. Zero doubt. Megaliar strikes again.
I am so glad you asked people to be respectful in the comments because this is about an innocent baby & her photo. Thank❤️ You Neil! And yes back in the 70's as a teenager, l was popping to the record store regularly, lol! Buying a 45 for under a dollar- "those *were* the days my friend"!! Incidentally, I still have the record collection l started at age 12.- 100+ LP's and 350+ 45's!! 👍🏻 Have a good day Neil! From Ottawa.🌈☮️🇨🇦
It’s a friends baby too big for a 1 year old, and they did indeed show this picture after they flew home . This picture of Duchess dollars is old her nose job was not done yet
Think I have said this before google model child and you will see both those children's photos are in there and who there parents are and it's not H and M and different names . I have read about it myself they are not there children . The little girl is Rebecca forgotten the little boys name. No Neil read goodle model children .
A lot of teeth for a one year old and where were her legs and where is Archie. She is a cute child but no real proof the child is theirs . Sick to death of their constant need for attention and the drip feeding by their PR teams to the media details of their lives. Want a private life 🙄 followed everywhere by Netflix cameras. Morning from Brisbane Australia 🇦🇺😃☀️🐨🦘
She is a pretty little girl. I can't help wondering why neither child has any of Meghan's coloring? Both are light and have reddish hair, you would think one woul have some of the coloring from the other side of the family.
THAT indeed is the $60,000 question isn't it?? Word has it here in the states that Lilibet had a surrogate mother which could explain the light coloring and red hair. And more importantly, anyone who took high school biology learned about recessive and dominant genes and blue and especially green eyes and red hair are the least dominant especially when mixed with ethnicities.
With red hair, both parents need to carry the gene for red hair 🤔 this is why Meghan probably made up The skin colour story, so she would never be asked about it herself about her children 😛 a hint is also in how the royal family announced lillybets birth. The wording was not what they use when a baby is born the natural way to the mother and the royal announcements are very well thought of things so it wasn’t a miss print
If you look at that line up on the balcony at Queen Elizabeth’s funeral , Sophie Wessex was also standing alone at the other end of the line and no one was talking out of respect to our Queen ,it was after all a funeral ,where the family were in mourning ,private feelings of grief , not at all the time to be chattering ,anyone with a modicum of compassion would realise that .
The whole focus was on Lilibet meeting the Queen, what about meeting her Grandfather Prince Charles and Archie. Where was Archie and why did they get to ignore PC. And no car seats in car......
This isn’t LILy. This is a pic of an 18 month- 2 year old child. There are no children. If they released this, why not with Archie? He has seemed to disappear.
I've been around the block a few times, as they say, and have experienced many different looks in babies, having had my own and so many young cousins, nephews and nieces I could not tell you how many. I know without a doubt that a child with such bright red hair as "Archie" was supposed to have had would not have it turn black as it is now. Similarly, I have seen "Lillibet's" hair change from red to blond in pictures. Now this would never happen in reality. If one is born a redhead, one stays a redhead until around middle age when the red often fades. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that these kids the Harkles use to dupe the pu blic are fake. I would wager that Harry is the father of both but they were born via a surrogate. It is well known that Meghan Markle cannot have children of her own. After having so many abortions in her earlier life, she needed a full hysterectomy and thus cannot bear children. I am also sick to death of the story that Meghan Markle is 41 years old when it has come out of her own father's mouth that she was born in 1977, making her 45 years old by my reckoning. Any child with a trace of African heritage would have inherited the typical African hair texture. One child not carrying this gene is a remote possibility, two - never!
This baby looks like she's two years old. She has alot of teeth, too. Why is she wearing a light material summer dress in the UK? As for, the picture of Harry's first wife holding the rent-a-baby, she looks 20 pounds lighter and 10 years younger.
@@pamelaanders6286 sometimes, yes, but on this particular weekend it was overcast, with showers and it wasn't really hot enough to dress a baby in such thin clothes and sit her on the ground
@@NellsTravelKitchen no even the Cambridge kids and Zaras kids had on summer dresses. I remember Kate released a photo of Charlotte at one pushing a little toy, she was also alone in the photo. I'm positive it's lilibet, and she is gorgeous. And no I'm not a sugar.
Imaginary birthday party, imaginary guests, mystery birthday child, old black and white photo being passed off as a new one..everything they do makes no sense.
Lillibet is one year old. How old could the black & white photo be!?!?!? I'm done!!!! Hilarious!!!! No more comments for more on this issue! #ridiculousRubbish
Lillibet’s arm and hand are far too big compared to her head ! and her top left tooth apparently should not show until 18 months old and her dress looks scruffy and non ironed ! and her hair has dark streaks photoshopped in WHY !
What about the picture of Lilibet with her brother, Archie? It was her birthday! Yet the picture posted of Lilibet with Megan was with other children and their mother. None with Archie! Nobody ever mentioned the presence of Archie in England. Did Harry and Megan forget (deliberately) to bring Archie along? Is he not part of the family that he is already relegated to a nobody because Lilibet is now more important, a namesake of HM the Queen? Just wondering!
There is only one 'Lilibet.' We have read that HM signed a note with her very personal, and private Family nickname that ONLY very few members of the Family were allowed to use, and she pIaced it on PP's coffin at his funeral. It was not meant to be 'ever' used again. Anyone who respects HM's heartfelt wish that day, will not use the name again.
I’m sorry but there are more than one Lilibet. It is not unique to the Queen. I used to call my sister Lilibet a lot and that was decades before I knew the Queen had that as a pet name.
@@thebraff I don't think that's the point. I think the offense is after Me-gain lied about and slandered the Royal Family, all while Prince Phillip was dying and the queen in her 90's was losing her beloved, she then had the audacity to name her daughter a very intimate and personal name that was given to the queen and only used by those intimate with the queen, so was obviously in reference to the woman who's entire life she just trashed and lied about. It wasn't a random choice, and it's not the word, it's the actions that lead up to the naming and the motivations for using that name that is so distressing and offensive to the public. Just like Uvalde. Someone stepped up and paid for every funeral in full and they did it anonymously. They chose to honor those people and support them during that horrific loss, without drawing attention away from that tragedy or imposing on their grief. Me-gain chose to show up with her stylist, make up artist, her body guard and a camera crew. She tried to go into areas that were off limits to get photos, then cleared an area where there were mourners to be filmed putting a bouquet on the graves, all the while offending everyone there and then flying off in her private jet.
I think of and call the little girl 'Lili'. I will never, ever, use the Queen's private and personal pet name for her. Appropriating the name Lilibet was an act of malice and spite parading as 'respect'.
I'm not at all interested in the Harkle offspring, other than to lament their isolation from their extended families. Something very, very wrong and abusive there if you ask me.
Neil come on this is not a photo of a 1 year old 18 months yes. I don't know any 1 year olds with a mouthful of teeth especially canines. The photo is very odd and definitely photoshopped! Either way whoever the child is she is absolutely beautiful 🤔🤔🇦🇺
The girl in the picture is cute but I don’t think it’s theirs. No one in the British Royal family saw those kids over the weekend not even the Queen. They wanted conditions with the the Queen and she said no. So something fishy is going on here.
That child is older than 1 year & suspiciously looks like Elton John. Regarding the BW photo, how did schmegs loose all that weight since the morning church service? Forget the release date.....obvious
Exactly! Only TWO ADULTS were on the flight manifest and there were no car seats for the kids in the car when they rolled down the window! No one saw Archie or Lili!
Well, So What's New 🤡h & 🧟mm "LIED"2 Us Again, But This Time, the harkels Declared, "There Was A Birthday Party 4 Lilibucks at Frogmore with QE2, & The Royal Cousins", The Cambridge's Were Chastised 4 Taking Their Kids 2 Wales 4 the Day, & Not Allowing Their 3 Kid's 2 go 2 Lili's B-day Party 🖤‼️ The LIE'S They Have Spewed on Us Again, Being "Wired" with Your Mic 🎤 pushed up By Her 👗Dress, Hi-Jacking A Car Instead of the Bus, Just So They Could Make A "GRAND ENTRANCE", & "EXIT" Their Vile Nature & Behaviours R All Self Serving, Manipulative, & TRUELY Border On the "INSANE" A Lot Of It Just Makes "NO SENSE" At All 🖤‼️ It's Just Who & What They R, Jealous Whiney, but Also RUTHLESS & EVIL 🖤 LIE'S LIE'S & MORE LIE'S, THAT'S ALL They Got Bad, Nasty, Evil, Vile, & Vulgar = the harkels 🤡 h & 🧟mm 🖤‼️🐂💩💩💩
If I could give Harry some advice I’d tell him to forget about his book. If he cares about having a good relationship with his royal family he needs to respect everyone’s privacy. It’s a start. Find some way to make money that doesn’t capitalize on his own royal-ness. That was only an accident of birth. Be who you are! You shouldn’t feel the need to capitalize on your heritage. You should recognize why your royal family doesn’t respect you.
You might think I'm mad Neil, but I don't think this baby girl is Lilibet at all. No baby of a mother of mixed race would be born without having inherited some of the kink in the hair. I doubt very much that she would have dead straight hair as this baby has. The red hair was the touch put in to persuade people that it was the child of Markle and Harry, but I very much doubt it was.
I agree. Megan is mixed race and this child has absolutely no mixed race features. Archie I could see the mixture of both parents. Could be Harry dna.... Confusing
Also, to create the recessive gene of red hair (that only 1.5% of the world's population has) there must be red hair on BOTH sides of the family. Unless there is some Celtic blood in Thomas Markle's past, it is highly unlikely that there is red hair on Meghan's side, enabling them to produce two children with zero black features.
People are burnt out from the game playing and manipulation. The poor children are so photo shopped no one believes who these children really are! It's all a sad game and now she's using her own children. Both parents are horrifying!
How does lillibet look like her father? He has curly wirey hair she has fine straight hair, he has narrow set eyes, she has wide set eyes, he always even as a chuld has a narrow face she has a wide plump face. Do not understand Neil why you think she looks like Harry.
@@smithface8791 If it's any indication that he feels towards his children like he did his Mother, no one else has the right to care for his kids, but him , and he guards that with a jealous vindictiveness.imo How sad
Picture looks photo shopped onto the grass, how does a child sit like that , typically their legs are popping out, looks like someone’s hand is holding her under her dress! 🤷🏻♀️
The picture of Lily had a copyright on it. This picture was taken before the trip to the UK because what office was open during the jubilee to copyright it. Thank you for your videos.
Always love watching the interactions between the Cambridges and the Tindals. As for those two , after all the love and respect they profess to have for the Queen, i felt it was deplorable how they flew back to USA before the festivities honoring their grandmother were over.
No one though is surprised by H&M's abrupt departure. The two were made to finally understand that, "Oh, this really isn't about us," and so they left.
I believe they were told to leave after it was discovered they were wearing wires and cameras for Netflix. Hence the sudden departure. It was also said Harry was crying, I’m sure he feels trapped but it’s the cage he made for himself so I have no sympathy for him.
No one cares about 44’s babies at this point. We have Kate & Williams beautiful children and Zara’s children to awe over!! Even Beatrice and her beautiful step son Wolfie are fun to see! Don’t really care about the Mole or her offspring
I am certainly not the first to mention the recessive gene for red hair, and the genetic unlikeliness of both of their children having red hair. Just thought it was worth repeating.
The suspense about Lili has subsided, no one cares as much as they had hoped. On the other hand, Prince Louis' moment with his grandpa Prince Charles looked so adorable.
No way that is a old photo & the child is not lily do they think people are that stupid how come the Queen didn’t met the child because there ant any children for God sake 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
I keep wondering how both children got ginger and fair. Statustical chances with a parent having dark hair and skin is less than 1 in 4. So not sure I understand.
I have heard the same thing. As with everywhere else they go there was no sign of children. Even the people in Montishitshow say they have never seen any children. Also, it has been verified that there are never any diapers or other things pointing to children in the trash. Things that make you go hmmmm.....
Mr Sean 😁, with a bit of research on genetics you will find many more amazing things with the Harkles. That both children have red hair is a rare probabilty....I'll leave it at that...
Yes, it’s practically genetically impossible, well…improbable, your word is better. Their getting a couple of kids with red hair also seems like they’re trying just a little too hard.
Susana Machuca - I'm not a geneticist, but my husband had bright orange hair. Two of our three children are blonde (like me) and the third is blonde with slight reddish undertones.
Dear Ms. Bookworm 2 on RUclips has a good explanation of this, but bottom line is that red hair is a recessive gene not a dominant one. Only way to change results and probabilities is by genetic engineering (Doctor I would like my child to have blue eyes, blond curly hair etc) Ooopsss...let the cat out of the bag....
It’s sad that she used her daughter to distract away from public ridicule; MM new the child’s photo would supersede the news of Boos her and H received.. but it still doesn’t distract from their folly, and no family pic for her bday. It’s always distract and compete, to their own detriment, H gets this now I believe..
Thank god someone Neil picked this up, this is an old photo, Meaghan has the menopause look now around her face and body, the photo shows a younger Meaghan, this is a head scratcher, love watching you everyday.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
Do people really care anymore, We have William and Kates children and they like all parents love to show them to the world and we love them for it. Thank you Neil 😊 💓
and no secrets either - you get what you see.
I couldn’t care less about the VILE HARKLES..
I can't wait to see what antics Louis gets into
I agree
I agree- I am so tired of their lies,stories and schemes, I could care less.
I see Lilybet is following in Archie's footsteps,different photos,different hair colour,just a lot of PR garbage from the Markles.
Photoshopped?? Megsy wouldn't do that would she???? Hahaha
I am so sick of the Harkles and their fake lives
And your life is real?
Lucdeb says the sugar with zero likes
Mabel, I don't think there's anyone who isn't. All the uncomfortable audience wants is to see the train wreck when it happens. It's greatly anticipated IMHO.
You are sick regardless.!
@@lucdeb5355
Is this the step sister or half sister so full of hate?
Excuse them for living!
The child pictured is adorable but she is not the child of H&M. Nor does she live with them.
Meghan looks 15 years younger if not more in the picture where she is holding the baby in the b & w photo. Why is the baby sitting by itself?
I am tired of Meghan and Harry's games. I feel really sorry for Harry
for how he has ruined his life and pushed his family away. He needs to be rescued and be humble and swallow his pride.
Exactly-Meghan is much younger in her the black and white photo and her nose is different--pre-plastic surgery
i agree
It is photoshopped. Meghan looked older last week. Well, she has to control everything.....
Certainly lost a lot of weight overnight.
I would have ran from the royal order. To stiff.
I feel sorry for the poor little souls. I hope nobody lets their mother near their pet rabbit.
George...Charlotte and Louis stole the show....AT LEAST WE KNOW THEY ARE REAL
That's right 🎉
The Cambridge kids definitely stole the show! Truly adorable and well behaved children! GREAT JOB raising them, Kate & William💗
@@leighwillis6881 Fools paradise....hilarious
Exactly
@@Patricialpgr I don’t think any of their supporters showed the video of Louis. They may not have seen it. Lol
When mother is 43% Nigerian, it's impossible for the 2 children having blonde hair and fair skin colour
The other woman is holding Meghan's child - surely.
They are holding each other's children!
The one Meghan is holding does look like the other woman as someone commented and Meghan's baby in is the other woman's arms! Look! She looks like Meghan, NOT the woman holding her!!
My word!! WHO DOES THAT!??
Only Meghan, surely.
She tricked the other woman into it, to get this photo, then lie about who her own baby is??
Surely not!!?? 😢
I still have a very uncomfortable feeling that there is something not right about the whole situation with the children.
Adorable child but not Methanes, where’s Archie and the rest of the party guest’s. How did Methane manage to loose 20+ pounds her teeth altered nose job and look 20 years younger all in 24 hour’s??
Ahhhhá..... exactly my sentiments !!
My questions too.... And I agree, the little girl, whoever she is, is adorable!
🎤 mic drop. 👏
@@journeysintothelight2133 Yes she is; just take a walk backward; go back to trooping of color 6 years ago; you will see adorable one year old in that picture.
@@virginiahopkins5735 Charlotte? What is the connection? I must be dumb, I don't understand, I think....
Any person that studies genetics will tell you the odds of two children having red hair when the one parent has dominant African American hair is nearly zero . Who are they kidding .
Yeah I can’t get past the red hair thing either.
Yes! Also, black (Megs natural hair color) is a dominant hair color….. How in the world they both have red hair? The mother must have red hair as well!?!😜
@@Green-ie1dn my mum suggested that they photoshop the hair colour as a ploy so kids don’t get recognised out and about- as everyone would be looking for little red heads not dark haired children. Good theory but not sure 😊
Remember, the earlier “Archies” did not have red hair, in particular that “Archie” at the beach. He had straight, VERY black hair! 😂🥱🙄🤥😅
@@mordrethboehm4818 yes- agreed 👍🏻
I think people don’t care because if you don’t care to show your child then people will also not care to see your child. I hate when people show picture of only their child feet, hands etc. every child has a right to privacy but teasing picture comes off as also being insulting to the public. I like how William and Kate are very protective of their children but for special occasions they show their full face.
Neil this can't be Lili this child is about 18 months old there was one photo with the queen as they never bought the kids. According to airport staff there were no children with them allegedly. All smoke and mirrors then going back to us saying the brf snubbed Lili were they not busy with the jubilee so their child is more important than the queen really WHat.
I didn’t see any kids in the car when the window went down. We’re they in another car? That kid, Lili is big for her age with lots of teeth so she’d be in a bigger car seat and maybe want to sit next to her Mum?
@@sunflower7532 Hasn't got enough suntan to look convincingly like Missy Markle's, there is a possible resemblance to the ex Royal Prince.
@@johnmead8437 I wonder if that’s why she hid the children because they were too white. My cousin’s family is mixed race, and one child is a very fair skinned,red head with green eyes. Of his 4 kids they are all really different. But no one has commented on why Meghan shared the photo of her photographer’s mixed race kids at the same time. I can’t put my finger on what she is trying to say.
@@sunflower7532 the photographer is black and his wife is white - their children are mixed. M is playing with us by saying her children should look more like them but they don't...
@@johnmead8437 imo she looks more like August Brooksbank than h
They are desperate. Sad couple.
Of course there is something fishy about that picture, isn’t there always with those two? There is always so much drama , they are tiring! Can’t they just act like normal people, I’m so sick of the sight of them and their antics. Go Away! Live your life!
These poor children! They are using them for monitry gain. Where was Archie? They don't seem to be giving them a normal life.
Look at her mouth. Too many teeth. So many folk on other sites have stated this.
There's always fishy going on with that couple, can never trust them.
@@Runaway26 put yourself in their shoes
Usually the child will inherit the darker complexion. It is odd that both children have Harry’s lighter complexion.
My friend is biracial and she has light skin.
And blue eyes with red hair. Where are her legs in the photo?
@@brigittejackson1312 It's possible if both parents carry the gene.
Even more possible with gene selection available during ivf. It's can't be used for skin colour per se. However if used to select eye color,eg blue, chances are the child will be fair skinned.
My child got the recessive genes on both side
has anybody said anything about the "birthday party"? I don't believe anything those 2 put forward.
There was no birthday party. No kids were brought with them. How could there be? The child in the pic is older than just 1 year. Too many teeth. Never released a pic of Archie that way. WHY NOT? JMO
@@laineymcd4074 child looks older than just turning 1. Some kids are walking, some not. Something is off as is usual with these people. Jmo
@@lhaynes6361 agree
@@lhaynes6361 not to mention that Megain looks much younger in the B&W photo!!
@@deplorable1900 it's such a lie...
Ignore them. They have been treated justly. To continue paying attention to them after her Majesty has shown us how to behave with this..
Well said.
Ignore who?
Another rude person ,SHOW US YOUR FAMILY !! HARRY DOES NOT OWE ANYBODY HIS PICS !!! GROW UP LONDON ETC.
@@bbigfish1langille940
No that is correct, but Meghan released the photos, without consulting H and on all counts he was very angry about it.
@@Atom-56 I was just thinking that by now perhaps Harry has had it up to here and wanted no part in this charade.
Thanks Neil. Lili is older than 12 mths, strange pic taken by a so called 'professional' photographer with no legs and dress ballooning around her. The pic of Meghan is definitely an old one, features including nose and chin were before cosmetic surgery, also much slimmer. Why wasn't Archie and Harry in the shots rather than the photographer and his family. Classic, smoke and mirrors.
The baby's hair is noticeably longer in the Birthday picture.
e*bay sEarcH ..... ping lau Mila .. a little angel just like Lili
Megnut's teeth are completely different and the other little girl's arm is missing! Definitely a fake photo and I hope it is being forensically examined.
Harry may be looking for his balls in the gardens of Frogmore cottage.
I can’t believe a word that these two say😂😂😂😂😂I believe that there are 0 children🇦🇺😎
It is being said that the picture is Meghan before plastic surgery. It definitely is odd. Why a picture with a friends child but none of Harry or Archie? As always, the plot thickens. It is guaranteed to cause a lot of talk keeping them in the public eye.
and did she get permission to put out a picture of another child? She was soon be at the lawyer's if anybody put out a picture of her child (wait, she already did that).
Have a look of a newborn doll called, Lila. Especially one where she wears little blue shorts. Someone else tipped me off in some comments and I googled it. Looks exactly the same. That’s why it looks so lifeless.
sometimes wee Archie's hair is bright red almost..and curious the odds of both children born with red hair?
She often goes in for filler plumping before big events, I wrote before hand to expect a ballooned appearance! Then over time it’ll deflate again, until the next filler. This time also layers of bronzer, missing the ear and temple area.
@@JS-es5ep Great point!
Well Neil they Definatley tried to over shadow Louie. That’s not a recent picture. She lost 20 pounds in a day plus many other things I can’t bother to mention. Their irrelevant now.
🎯 Totally TRUE
They underestimate us, must think we are stupid! They are the stupid one's.
yes -- and her hair color changed a bit between her appearance at St Pauls and then in the pic of her and Lili. its not a drastic difference but still significant enough
@@malomama4750 and looking at the nose. Clearly not the same. 🤦♀️
EVERYTHING IS WRONG WITH IT!!! 😁🤭🤣🤣
And yet - neither hospital where the duchess supposedly gave birth has a record of these births!
I’m going with the theory that H&M dropped the photo timely to distract from the bad publicity of their BOO-ing !!!
Unfortunately for them, no one cares about them or their children. The picture is a non event. Total bore.
That being the case, they failed - miserably! As ever!!
I think the Harkles planned to pair it with a pic of the baby with the Queen.
My thoughts as well.
That’s awful. Meghot using her daughter to deflect her unpopularity.
I feel extremely sorry for these children they look to me as pawns in a game their parents are truly engaged in
Ditto!
If they cared at ALL ABOUT THOSE KIDS they wouldn’t get rid of EVERY SINGLE FAMILY MEMBER SO THE KIDS GROW UP IN SOLITUDE.. Family is so important for so many reasons and these kids are basically orphans with 2 psychotic narcissistic parents.. 😂
Don't feel sorry these kids will have the best of everything. Theirs a lot of kids homeless tonight as we speak.
Exactly 💯
I predict she will grow up to look like Doria in the facial features, Dorias genes are too strong
Well, after their catastrophic jubilee (as everything is about them), they have to prove to their sponsors that they are tabloidly alive. So in order to counter the wave created by Louis, they releases this picture. There are a lot of common points between Megan and Amber, for both of them, everything and everyone should orbit around them and they do know the truth. Both are despicable.
Narcissists. At least JD got free (kind of).
You have hit the nail on the head.
🎯💯
3
khaela Mensha, They have one thing in common though. Nobody knew who they were till they married rich and famous men.
@@lornaglasper6769
That is right, good point 😄
That is an adorable baby but, she is definitely not just turning one. She is older. I have been working in the early childhood development field for 25+ yrs. and if you're a parent you would also know this but, no one year old has a mouth full of teeth. They have 2 possibly 4. They may have a couple that are breaking out along the jawline. They are still in the teething phase and they will usually have their full set of baby teeth by the age of 3. This baby has more teeth then she should for a one yr. old. She is a cutie though!
The picture taken in December Lillibet had very little hair. Amazing how fast her hair grew but also how big she is for a 1 year old. Why wasn't Archie in that same picture with his sister and mom?
My daughter is 8 months n still not that much hair. Also the baby is huge for a one year old (the one she is carrying)
And where are her legs?
@@laineymcd4074 being born with teeth is extremely rare and it’s usually the bottom teeth. Having said that, my oldest did cut 4 upper teeth at once. That was rough on her (and us) But honestly that child looks older and M looks YOUNGER in that B&W photo!
Exactly! Where is Archie?
@@elizabethv1979 Exactly what I was thinking. He has had 3 birthdays and they have never had such a clear picture of him released for his birthday.
Everything the Harkles do is odd. I’m more worried what Pearl’s gonna do after feeling so dismissed, disrespected, and most of all, Charles blowing a 😘 too Catherine...Buckle up
Pearl?????
who is Pearl?
@@lindah5011 The title character of what was supposed to be her Netflix show.
@@lindah5011 Pearl is the name of that silly show Meghan was going to put out by Netflix. Netflix dropped the project though. The character in the show "pearl" is supposed to be based on Meghan as a young girl who travels through time meeting famous women in history.
@@riley5227 hasn't M travelled through time as an adult judging by that b/w photo? She is truly talented. 😏
I have been looking at all the fuss made of the release of Lilibet pictures. Something doesn't smell right about the pictures. In the black and white photo taken of Meghan with Camillia Harriman, that child who they call Lilibet looks the spitting image of this friend Camillia. Meghan also looks so much younger , not as cosmetically altered as she is now. Megan was also very tan at the church service and in the window at BP. If that child is Lilibet, I doubt she is from Meghan. Only 1-2% of the world population are gingers. Black hair and brown eyes are 70% more dominate than light hair and red is a recessive gene and both parents would have to have one and yet we are led to believe H&M have two out of two. Only 17% of world population have blue eyes. Wasn't Archie passed off as ginger and blue eyed? You can't tell me that nothing of Meghan's genes got into to those children's gene pools. Also I found it very strange that these people, Misan and Camillia Harriman, were not mentioned in any of the articles as gusts (until now) at this "party" for the birthday. However the ones that were mentioned over and over again are not in any photos and not even Archie or Harry? Oh , and now there are articles saying that the queen would not allow photos and then she did allow but the pictures were kept with the queen? Always mysteries and nothing can be verified. We are always supposed to rely on faith in the biggest liars, the press and Harry and Meghan. There is a HUGE CON going on. The public has been suckered.
They are all thumbing the nose at the public.
This child is not the offspring of these parents!!!
Simply stated this was a 21st Century attempt to undermine the Monarchy using this well scripted ruse to claim the Throne?? Well, now that MM has the title of Duchess. Perhaps, we need to roll back the "film" and start from the beginning so as to reveal the "scripted plot" regarding MM seeking a royal name, trading off the name, and to do that she required a genuine royal Prince, (Harry), to be her "co-star". The heart of a woman/man who is intent on attaining a super star persona, is required to study their role so well as to "become" their character and to reflect their character so naturally that they themselves disappears. MM study the films and videos of Princess
Dianna, that would have included Harry as a baby, toddler, young child and into adulthood whereas Prince Harry met MM as he did with no prior knowledge of her life. Big difference. Harry has been swindled. Unconsciously, Harry was drawn to the older woman in MM, yet she most craftily played her cards until she obtained a Royal Flush.
This is an old picture that keeps on being shown. It NEVER seems to change she doesn't seem to grow @ all
As a Mum, I had three children, twins + one, if I ever spoke about them I always referred to all three, never just one. I don't know what it is, but something is not right.
That reminds me of Michael J. Fox going home to his parents for a visit and he gave them an award he had won for acting. He said the next morning he got up and there beside it, his mother had placed a sports event trophy of his sibling 😊...keeping it equal. Being a stable individual he found it funny and repeated the story in a few interviews. Sorry for digressing, I just thought it was cute and most parents can relate to it...I know I can. 😄.
@@Grace-tc1lq Thank you for sharing that gem, no wonder Michael has his feet firmly on the ground with parents like that. Love it, thanks .
I agree and I don’t know what it is exactly but something is very off with these people. It’s not just one thing, it’s almost everything. If you genuinely came to have your grandmother meet your daughter, why did you pick the Jubilee to come over, knowing full well your whole family would be extremely busy. Why not come say a week before ( and stay for the festivities of course ) or stay an extra week after everything had quieted down. That birthday party would be considered tone deaf knowing nobody would be free to attend. A one yo would never know the difference if you didn’t celebrate on the actual date. Heck a one yo will have zero memory of the day ! It just doesn’t add up. The two photos released are very odd. You’d think they could have at least appeared publicly once like a normal family of 4 just to shut the cynics but noooooo. I don’t know if that’s their way of keeping the mystery and therefore the interest alive ? Everything is drama with them 🤦♀️
@@Booboonancy Nancy, a normal loving family would include their son, and you're right, no one would hold a party on the 4th June, knowing everyone's unavailable. Everything about them isn't right, extremely unhealthy.
We have yet to see Lily. This is a beautiful little girl, but many irregularities in the photo
People on twitter and you tube are saying she is 14 month old Rebecca Cord, granddaughter of the gardener at Montecito. Others think she photoshopped a picture of August or even Harry. Child looks too old and has too many teeth for 1. It is very odd to pair this with an obviously old black and white picture of the wife holding yet another mystery child, or maybe photoshopped child. And no evidence they were even in England. There have just been too many lies, too much mysteriously unavailable info, and too many inconsistencies in photos, stories to believe anything they put out.
It's August eugine son
They still refuse to produce a clear picture of Archie in this portraite style.
Why all the subterfuge?
Hi Neil I agree a lot of mystery round the children and whatever it’s those children we feel sorry for regards and I do believe that that picture was put out at the wrong time,with all the mystery surrounding theses children most have given up on knowing anything about them…William and Catherine have always shared there childrens growth and we love them for that …have a wonderful day Neil
According to Celt Views, the ground workers claimed that there were no children with them on arrival and also going back. I wonder why she didn't have a curly hair like her mother
Right...no children were seen getting off or on the 🛩...outside of London
Actually Harry has very curly hair also 🤷♀️
@@lesliemoore2644 - As a child, Harry had very straight hair - and much lighter in colour.
@@lesliemoore2644 Meghan has a FRIZZ! She straightens her natural frizz.
@@lesliemoore2644 It is most likely a transplant from his chest. Used to be very straight.
the mothers face shrunk suddenly!!! Dont trust her 🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅🍅
A mouth full of teeth 🦷 and only one yr old?? Photoshopped and very strange.
There is something very wrong here. That picture they released is the exact picture her friend has on her insta with her family trip to Italy . Unless the children are identical matching hair and dresses . I was in shock when I saw this same picture on markles friends story . They didn't even bother to tweak it a little .
Which friend? I’d love to see it!
Me too, a link to back up plus friend name. 😉
One gentleman wrote in earlier and said the child is her gardener’s grandchild her name is Rebecca Cord. So Sean, more smoke and mirrors 😎😎
Sean is his Surname!
Meghan live in all you ppl head.she will give you all a nervous breakdown
It's odd to me that Megan's PR team wouldn't realize they people would find out who the girl in the photo really is. This is lame to the max.
I don't want to hear of or see the child with the stolen pet name from HMTQ, just another jab every single time.
I think the child looks older than one year old. I also wonder if anyone turned up to the garden party. The cake doesn’t look very kiddie friendly. Perhaps that’s why they escaped because it was one disaster after the other.
Nice tie, Neil
The baby has a lot of teeth for a one year old
I too thought the child in picture looked older
On Archie's 1st birthday, that one was weird too, the kid looked to be much older, there were no balloons, no children, no Harry, no cake, no presents. There was an american guy with her taking their photo ,no british accent so it wasn't Harry. All psychics/tarot readers said it wasn't Archie at all.
@ Sunflower strongly agree with you.
That’s the only actress they could get traveling papers for.
I myself am sick of the whole thing there have been so many lilibets. It's insane. Harry and Meghan need to grow up.
Can’t be the same baby from Christmas photo. Hair doesn’t change color and grow that fast in babies.
I was thinking the same thing
She had no hair hardly at Christmas. I think if you have had children you know they change weekly. But again you might not!!!!
That's exactly what I thought especially since in December she barely had hair.
YES !! and the teeth !! Most (children) have between TWO and FOUR teeth by the time they're one year old. Eventually, at around age two and a half, most children will have all of their 20 baby teeth"
Christmas was only 5 months ago and look how much she's grown in that time 😳 she's the image of Ron Howard
The child looked older than 1 and she had a lot of teeth ! I think it was taken in th US
I agree! That child may have had to be returned to USA by a
Certain time.
Her chin is different, her nose is drastically different, her teeth shape is different, not to mention she's at least 30lbs lighter in the black and white photo. Absolutely photoshopped. Zero doubt. Megaliar strikes again.
Wouldnt you photoshop if you had a choice? Even if did is there somthing wrong?
,havent you got somthing more interesting to talk about?
@@ramanidesaram5913 Haven't you ?
@@ramanidesaram5913 nope. I wouldn't. But, I'm not dishonest. If you aren't interested in this topic, why are you here?
I think she gets a kick out of the photoshopping and “fooling us.” She needs a new hobby.
And her hair is dark, but in oic she had red in her hair
I am so glad you asked people to be respectful in the comments because this is about an innocent baby & her photo. Thank❤️ You Neil!
And yes back in the 70's as a teenager, l was popping to the record store regularly, lol! Buying a 45 for under a dollar- "those *were* the days my friend"!! Incidentally, I still have the record collection l started at age 12.- 100+ LP's and 350+ 45's!! 👍🏻 Have a good day Neil! From Ottawa.🌈☮️🇨🇦
It’s a friends baby too big for a 1 year old, and they did indeed show this picture after they flew home . This picture of Duchess dollars is old her nose job was not done yet
Think I have said this before google model child and you will see both those children's photos are in there and who there parents are and it's not H and M and different names . I have read about it myself they are not there children . The little girl is Rebecca forgotten the little boys name. No Neil read goodle model children .
I wonder whose child that is?!
A lot of teeth for a one year old and where were her legs and where is Archie. She is a cute child but no real proof the child is theirs . Sick to death of their constant need for attention and the drip feeding by their PR teams to the media details of their lives. Want a private life 🙄 followed everywhere by Netflix cameras. Morning from Brisbane Australia 🇦🇺😃☀️🐨🦘
The “private life” was just a red herring. Some explanation for them taking off was needed.
She is a pretty little girl. I can't help wondering why neither child has any of Meghan's coloring? Both are light and have reddish hair, you would think one woul have some of the coloring from the other side of the family.
THAT indeed is the $60,000 question isn't it?? Word has it here in the states that Lilibet had a surrogate mother which could explain the light coloring and red hair. And more importantly, anyone who took high school biology learned about recessive and dominant genes and blue and especially green eyes and red hair are the least dominant especially when mixed with ethnicities.
Surrogate,there was a pic.of her moon bump falling!!In the hideous green dress...lol
With red hair, both parents need to carry the gene for red hair 🤔 this is why Meghan probably made up
The skin colour story, so she would never be asked about it herself about her children 😛 a hint is also in how the royal family announced lillybets birth. The wording was not what they use when a baby is born the natural way to the mother and the royal announcements are very well thought of things so it wasn’t a miss print
My husband is Mexican and both my boys came out blonde hair and Blue/ brown eyes and my pale skin lol
Mystery to the Britts only.....remember it was her first birthday...duh? Are your comments positive?
If you look at that line up on the balcony at Queen Elizabeth’s funeral , Sophie Wessex was also standing alone at the other end of the line and no one was talking out of respect to our Queen ,it was after all a funeral ,where the family were in mourning ,private feelings of grief , not at all the time to be chattering ,anyone with a modicum of compassion would realise that .
The whole focus was on Lilibet meeting the Queen, what about meeting her Grandfather Prince Charles and Archie. Where was Archie and why did they get to ignore PC. And no car seats in car......
This isn’t LILy. This is a pic of an 18 month- 2 year old child. There are no children. If they released this, why not with Archie? He has seemed to disappear.
Why release a photo without Harry and Archie ?
Cause its all about Meggie.
Its all about mememel and her golden child archie don't exist anymore that poor child feel sorry for him
Because the photographers wife & kids were more important🤪
I've been around the block a few times, as they say, and have experienced many different looks in babies, having had my own and so many young cousins, nephews and nieces I could not tell you how many. I know without a doubt that a child with such bright red hair as "Archie" was supposed to have had would not have it turn black as it is now. Similarly, I have seen "Lillibet's" hair change from red to blond in pictures. Now this would never happen in reality. If one is born a redhead, one stays a redhead until around middle age when the red often fades. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that these kids the Harkles use to dupe the pu blic are fake. I would wager that Harry is the father of both but they were born via a surrogate. It is well known that Meghan Markle cannot have children of her own. After having so many abortions in her earlier life, she needed a full hysterectomy and thus cannot bear children. I am also sick to death of the story that Meghan Markle is 41 years old when it has come out of her own father's mouth that she was born in 1977, making her 45 years old by my reckoning. Any child with a trace of African heritage would have inherited the typical African hair texture. One child not carrying this gene is a remote possibility, two - never!
Also a fake picture
This baby looks like she's two years old. She has alot of teeth, too. Why is she wearing a light material summer dress in the UK?
As for, the picture of Harry's first wife holding the rent-a-baby, she looks 20 pounds lighter and 10 years younger.
It appears you don't think we have Summer in the UK, right? Of course we do. Hot Summers too.
@@pamelaanders6286 sometimes, yes, but on this particular weekend it was overcast, with showers and it wasn't really hot enough to dress a baby in such thin clothes and sit her on the ground
@@NellsTravelKitchen no even the Cambridge kids and Zaras kids had on summer dresses. I remember Kate released a photo of Charlotte at one pushing a little toy, she was also alone in the photo. I'm positive it's lilibet, and she is gorgeous. And no I'm not a sugar.
Imaginary birthday party, imaginary guests, mystery birthday child, old black and white photo being passed off as a new one..everything they do makes no sense.
Lillibet is one year old. How old could the black & white photo be!?!?!? I'm done!!!! Hilarious!!!! No more comments for more on this issue! #ridiculousRubbish
Lillibet’s arm and hand are far too big compared to her head ! and her top left tooth apparently should not show until 18 months old and her dress looks scruffy and non ironed ! and her hair has dark streaks photoshopped in WHY !
Imaginary legs…
@@1950kath 😡👹😈💩👹😡🤬👺 LEAVE BEAUTIFUL LILLIBET ALONE! IF ITS NOT NICE, KEEP YOUR BLASTED BLOODY MOUTH SHUT!!!!!!!
@@misstmemrs Have you ever seen a step or a bench? It's often used as a prop when one is photographed. Duh!
What about the picture of Lilibet with her brother, Archie? It was her birthday! Yet the picture posted of Lilibet with Megan was with other children and their mother. None with Archie! Nobody ever mentioned the presence of Archie in England. Did Harry and Megan forget (deliberately) to bring Archie along? Is he not part of the family that he is already relegated to a nobody because Lilibet is now more important, a namesake of HM the Queen? Just wondering!
the child in her arms has different length hair. I SWEAR I have seen that photo before---scour the internet. It must be there
That baby in her arms looks like Harry as a baby except with long (photoshopped) hair. Could that little face be his?
Yes I had a weird dejevue feeling like I'd seen that photo before....🤔
Lilibeth does not have afro hair as her allegelly afro mom. Genetics, please. Everything about the baby is very strange.
Lilibet.
No one curl on Lil's hair?!🙄🙄 No one?! Pleaseeeee. The evil duo think we're dumb and haven't taken biology lessons. 🙄🙄🙄
I totally agree with you.
Where is Archie? Pictures with someone else's children but not her brother?! Makes me furious if this is lili not having a picture with her brother
He was starring in another show
Imagine its like archie don't exist anymore that poor child and you can see they show lilibet face but no archie face
@@kanezaanny8908 I am starting to think neither child exists.
There are no kids
@@Traceysthoughts exactly bingo
Actually the dead giveaway in the black and white photo is Meghans ring before it was upgraded with the diamonds. Old photo .
There is only one 'Lilibet.' We have read that HM signed a note with her very personal, and private Family nickname that ONLY very few members of the Family were allowed to use, and she pIaced it on PP's coffin at his funeral. It was not meant to be 'ever' used again. Anyone who respects HM's heartfelt wish that day, will not use the name again.
I’m sorry but there are more than one Lilibet. It is not unique to the Queen. I used to call my sister Lilibet a lot and that was decades before I knew the Queen had that as a pet name.
The note on Price Philip's coffin was not signed 'Lilibet'
@@thebraff I don't think that's the point. I think the offense is after Me-gain lied about and slandered the Royal Family, all while Prince Phillip was dying and the queen in her 90's was losing her beloved, she then had the audacity to name her daughter a very intimate and personal name that was given to the queen and only used by those intimate with the queen, so was obviously in reference to the woman who's entire life she just trashed and lied about. It wasn't a random choice, and it's not the word, it's the actions that lead up to the naming and the motivations for using that name that is so distressing and offensive to the public. Just like Uvalde. Someone stepped up and paid for every funeral in full and they did it anonymously. They chose to honor those people and support them during that horrific loss, without drawing attention away from that tragedy or imposing on their grief. Me-gain chose to show up with her stylist, make up artist, her body guard and a camera crew. She tried to go into areas that were off limits to get photos, then cleared an area where there were mourners to be filmed putting a bouquet on the graves, all the while offending everyone there and then flying off in her private jet.
@@cidk59 exactly perfectly stated👍♥️🇦🇺
I think of and call the little girl 'Lili'. I will never, ever, use the Queen's private and personal pet name for her. Appropriating the name Lilibet was an act of malice and spite parading as 'respect'.
I'm not at all interested in the Harkle offspring, other than to lament their isolation from their extended families. Something very, very wrong and abusive there if you ask me.
Neil come on this is not a photo of a 1 year old 18 months yes.
I don't know any 1 year olds with a mouthful of teeth especially canines.
The photo is very odd and definitely photoshopped!
Either way whoever the child is she is absolutely beautiful 🤔🤔🇦🇺
1 year-old possums
The photo has no legs maybe because Lily is older and it would be a definite give away. 🤔 Lily is a beautiful baby…but looks about 18 months.
Who cares to see their kids, she is not royal. I agree Neil the photo is very different, more photo shopping happening?
A one year does not have that many teeth. How sad they are marketing the child.
The girl in the picture is cute but I don’t think it’s theirs. No one in the British Royal family saw those kids over the weekend not even the Queen. They wanted conditions with the the Queen and she said no. So something fishy is going on here.
That child is older than 1 year & suspiciously looks like Elton John. Regarding the BW photo, how did schmegs loose all that weight since the morning church service? Forget the release date.....obvious
God be with the children forever
I want to know why she had the other children's faces grotesquely painted and not her child?
No 1-year old has all their teeth! FAKE!
Mine did.
What's The "TRUTH" Did The harkels Come with any Kids ? "NO" THEY DID NOT" Stated People Working There At The Airport 🖤‼️
Exactly! Only TWO ADULTS were on the flight manifest and there were no car seats for the kids in the car when they rolled down the window! No one saw Archie or Lili!
BOTH airports
@@festivelady826 Car seats in the Range Rover that picked them up at the airport? No nanny? No personal staff or bodyguard?
Well, So What's New 🤡h & 🧟mm "LIED"2 Us Again, But This Time, the harkels Declared, "There Was A Birthday Party 4 Lilibucks at Frogmore with QE2, & The Royal Cousins", The Cambridge's Were Chastised 4 Taking Their Kids 2 Wales 4 the Day, & Not Allowing Their 3 Kid's 2 go 2 Lili's B-day Party 🖤‼️ The LIE'S They Have Spewed on Us Again, Being "Wired" with Your Mic 🎤 pushed up By Her 👗Dress, Hi-Jacking A Car Instead of the Bus, Just So They Could Make A "GRAND ENTRANCE", & "EXIT" Their Vile Nature & Behaviours R All Self Serving, Manipulative, & TRUELY Border On the "INSANE" A Lot Of It Just Makes "NO SENSE" At All 🖤‼️ It's Just Who & What They R, Jealous Whiney, but Also RUTHLESS & EVIL 🖤
LIE'S LIE'S & MORE LIE'S, THAT'S ALL They Got Bad, Nasty, Evil, Vile, & Vulgar = the harkels 🤡 h & 🧟mm 🖤‼️🐂💩💩💩
If I could give Harry some advice I’d tell him to forget about his book. If he cares about having a good relationship with his royal family he needs to respect everyone’s privacy. It’s a start. Find some way to make money that doesn’t capitalize on his own royal-ness. That was only an accident of birth. Be who you are! You shouldn’t feel the need to capitalize on your heritage. You should recognize why your royal family doesn’t respect you.
You might think I'm mad Neil, but I don't think this baby girl is Lilibet at all. No baby of a mother of mixed race would be born without having inherited some of the kink in the hair. I doubt very much that she would have dead straight hair as this baby has. The red hair was the touch put in to persuade people that it was the child of Markle and Harry, but I very much doubt it was.
No one curl?! No afro hair as her allegelly mom?! Pleaseeeeee
I agree. Megan is mixed race and this child has absolutely no mixed race features. Archie I could see the mixture of both parents. Could be Harry dna.... Confusing
I agree.
Also, to create the recessive gene of red hair (that only 1.5% of the world's population has) there must be red hair on BOTH sides of the family. Unless there is some Celtic blood in Thomas Markle's past, it is highly unlikely that there is red hair on Meghan's side, enabling them to produce two children with zero black features.
With both parents having curly hair, no way
I don't believe she is theirs. She is a doll though.
People are burnt out from the game playing and manipulation. The poor children are so photo shopped no one believes who these children really are! It's all a sad game and now she's using her own children. Both parents are horrifying!
Beautiful baby girl. Wish she had the benefit of family around her. She has neither side. Pity. God bless you angel.
That's true.... no family around these kids 😔
It is their Parents fault. Arrogance, greed and jealousy are a bad combination.
How does lillibet look like her father? He has curly wirey hair she has fine straight hair, he has narrow set eyes, she has wide set eyes, he always even as a chuld has a narrow face she has a wide plump face. Do not understand Neil why you think she looks like Harry.
At one years old Lilibet has enough teeth to eat an 8oz steak and peanut brittle with no problem
Neil, she has ‘bulked up’ as she has become older. That pic of her holding the baby is several years old.
My god real
👍exactly
She is not holding a baby in the Black & White photo, that is a toddler, look at the legs and feet
All I can say is I feel so sorry for those children. Really sad situation what H&M are doing merching their children and isolation them. 🤔😪
Agree and those children will pay for H and M and their bizarre behaviour.
@@helend222 Why do they have to continue creating mystery all the time?
There is no doubt they are merching them
@@smithface8791 To stay in the news.
@@smithface8791 If it's any indication that he feels towards his children like he did his Mother, no one else has the right to care for his kids, but him , and he guards that with a jealous vindictiveness.imo How sad
So why not archie then ? This is for money 💰 only deviuse pair.
Picture looks photo shopped onto the grass, how does a child sit like that , typically their legs are popping out, looks like someone’s hand is holding her under her dress! 🤷🏻♀️
Where are the legs 🧐
The child also looks more like 18-20 months not 1yo
I don't think the photo is odd at all. I have a photo of myself at her age sitting in the same way, dress billowy and legs not to be seen.
Squatting with her tiny legs hidden in the dress. Come on people🙄
I was wondering about the background- is it at Montecito or Frogmore Cottage?
The picture of Lily had a copyright on it. This picture was taken before the trip to the UK because what office was open during the jubilee to copyright it.
Thank you for your videos.
Certainly not on a Sunday in the UK when the photo was ( supposedly ) taken.
Good observation
You don’t need an office to copyright something, you can just write or print that you are retaining copyright. The © symbol usually denotes formal copyright.
Always love watching the interactions between the Cambridges and the Tindals. As for those two , after all the love and respect they profess to have for the Queen, i felt it was deplorable how they flew back to USA before the festivities honoring their grandmother were over.
No one though is surprised by H&M's abrupt departure. The two were made to finally understand that, "Oh, this really isn't about us," and so they left.
I believe they were told to leave after it was discovered they were wearing wires and cameras for Netflix. Hence the sudden departure. It was also said Harry was crying, I’m sure he feels trapped but it’s the cage he made for himself so I have no sympathy for him.
The Couple was angry because they didn't receive the attention they craved.
No children on or off the
plane. Megan was wired.
??‽?‽?????????????
@@patkelley5657 look at her clothes, you can see the mic, yes she was wired, she’s a total fake!
No one cares about 44’s babies at this point. We have Kate & Williams beautiful children and Zara’s children to awe over!! Even Beatrice and her beautiful step son Wolfie are fun to see! Don’t really care about the Mole or her offspring
I am certainly not the first to mention the recessive gene for red hair, and the genetic unlikeliness of both of their children having red hair. Just thought it was worth repeating.
Everyone always wants to say Harry's kids have red hair, don't they? 🙄
My mom and dad had two redheads and neither one nor any of our grandparents had red hair.
Yep
I have a friend who is a ginger and she has two ginger daughters.
I think she used a red haired woman surrogate or a donor egg screened for genetically red haired genes. Only DNA would tell the truth.
The suspense about Lili has subsided, no one cares as much as they had hoped. On the other hand, Prince Louis' moment with his grandpa Prince Charles looked so adorable.
They released the picture because it's her birthday. nothing odd about that but the black and white pic is very odd
I told you it wouldn't be long till the kids starting being shown. This screams desperation to me.
No way that is a old photo & the child is not lily do they think people are that stupid how come the Queen didn’t met the child because there ant any children for God sake 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺
I loved it all especially the skit with Paddington and our lovely Queen we love her. Australia
Her eye shape doesnt look like any immediate family member
Thank you. Finally someone remembered it was about the Queen's birthday. Have a good day.
@@margueritemajor7286 her grandpa.
Anyone else notice how the baby that's supposed to be Meghan's looks very much like the other woman in the picture?
Neil, what a lovely picture of Catherine and the Cambridge children, you showed, at the top of the steps! ❤💗❤💗🇬🇧
A beautiful picture!
I keep wondering how both children got ginger and fair. Statustical chances with a parent having dark hair and skin is less than 1 in 4. So not sure I understand.
Meghan does not have dark skin.
The people who were working at frogmore said they saw no children, nor were they seen getting off or on that private jet
it was also reported they left on Saturday night not Sunday, and no one saw any children in the car, or get on the plane
I have heard the same thing. As with everywhere else they go there was no sign of children. Even the people in Montishitshow say they have never seen any children. Also, it has been verified that there are never any diapers or other things pointing to children in the trash. Things that make you go hmmmm.....
Is that the reason why William and Kate declined the B'day invite ...why go to a B'day party where there is no B'day boy or B'day girl 😁
@@sujitshome1876 they had a previous engagement on behalf of the Queen in Wales
proof or direct quotes? the kid looks like harry.
Mr Sean 😁, with a bit of research on genetics you will find many more amazing things with the Harkles. That both children have red hair is a rare probabilty....I'll leave it at that...
Yes, it’s practically genetically impossible, well…improbable, your word is better.
Their getting a couple of kids with red hair also seems like they’re trying just a little too hard.
@@harrietcraig6716 Precisely.
Susana Machuca - I'm not a geneticist, but my husband had bright orange hair. Two of our three children are blonde (like me) and the third is blonde with slight reddish undertones.
Dear Ms. Bookworm 2 on RUclips has a good explanation of this, but bottom line is that red hair is a recessive gene not a dominant one. Only way to change results and probabilities is by genetic engineering (Doctor I would like my child to have blue eyes, blond curly hair etc) Ooopsss...let the cat out of the bag....
@@racheleraanan5133 Blonde is a variant of red.
It’s sad that she used her daughter to distract away from public ridicule; MM new the child’s photo would supersede the news of Boos her and H received.. but it still doesn’t distract from their folly, and no family pic for her bday.
It’s always distract and compete, to their own detriment, H gets this now I believe..
Thank god someone Neil picked this up, this is an old photo, Meaghan has the menopause look now around her face and body, the photo shows a younger Meaghan, this is a head scratcher, love watching you everyday.