I’m a Fuji medium format shooter w the 50r, 100s and a poop ton of lenses. I bought a Q2 about two months ago and it is the most gorgeous, easy to use camera EVER. My favorite focal length is 27-28mm which I use with my X system. I’m actually selling my 50r in a week or so.
You are going to love it! Just give yourself some time to learn the camera and it’s abilities and shortcomings… then it will be the best you’ve ever owned.
I've had my Q2 a little over 3 years now and taken thousands of photos on it and it's been a lot of places. Usually I'm always first to check out the latest gear but the Q2 still feels highly capable to me and I will be trying the Q3 when it releases but sticking to the Q2 for sure. To your point of it not feeling out dated in a few years I agree. It's already a phenomenal camera.
I hope to buy a used Leica in the next year or two…I use the Q2 at work and adore it. I’m ambivalent about the Q3 upgrades. By the time I buy I could probably go either way used.
I am on the list for the Q3. Mainly because I want Leica video in a small camera. I have the SL2-S and love it, but a small Q would be fantastic! I currently have the Q2 Reporter and it is fantastic!!!
It sounds like the video on the 3 is really good. My daughter pointed out that it doesn’t have a mic-in but I’m wondering if there is an option for the usb -c to be used for a mic
sold mine, must have been confused, because I've bought another and it's due in 5 days and I'm chomping on the bit. some of my favourite shots ever came off the Q2, including my desktop picture. it's a really great instrument.
I had the Q2 from March 2019 until last year wonderful camera, I sold it and got the Q2M with color filters. The main reason for this switch is the Q2 at ISO 6400 is maxed out for a usable print At ISO 6400 the Q2M is just getting warmed up The new Q3 will shoot at 16000 ISO nicely Huge upgrade. The updated AF will be significantly faster
Apples and Tuesdays here, but I see a similarity with the outgoing fuji models. The chipset for the generation of xt3/xe4/x100v/xpro3 presents a tremendous balance of speed and image size. So much so that the x100v and xe4 sell more USED than new. The newer generation of fujis bring 40mp vs 25mp, which introduces less speed, more storage speeds, more detail work, etc, The only new fuji, the xh2s, that has a 26mp is becoming very popular.
I find that the used market tells a lot about a camera. Look at eBay first for the body under “parts only” seeing how many are listed for parts will give you a very good idea how they hold up. Second look at how many are actually for sale. This varies of course by new model release dates and the occasional fad rush. But getting to the point of used camera, specifically Fuji - the X-T3 / absolutely the best value and still amazing output of them all.
Just picked up a new Q2 from a leica shop in the UK as they offered me a good deal on the disney version ,they also threw in a handgrip and spare battery 📷
I agree with your observation 80% of the time. I don't care for tilty screen or sixty megapixels too. They are for tourists. 😆 However, Q3 pushes the limits Q2 can't perform esp under extreme light conditions. Perhaps you should test a Q3 at 2am. 🤓 Then, you know what I mean.
I just looked at a Q3 to replace my Q2 and decided not to upgrade. That rear screen on the Q3 detracts from the look of the camera. And I don[t need the added megapixels as I shoot with a Fuji 50r an 100s
I totally agree with you. And based on the rumours, if they are true, Leica thinks the same keeping the Q2 in the line up as an „entry level“ Leica Q system. Let’s see what happens on release date 😊
I'm curious to know of the phase detect lines you refer to ? Are you referring to the IR focus assist beams ? I have had my Q3 a week now, but not able to fault the phase detect !! Cheers to you
On some cameras / lighting situations, the phase detect lines appear in images. Nothing to do with IR focus assist. It’s usually the perfect storm but def shows at those times.
Having seen the latest Q3 videos I've been trying hard to think what actual improvements over my Q2 would make me want this... but I could think of none. Tilt screen? No. 8K video on THIS particular camera? No. Wireless charger that is so slow? No. For the portraits I shoot anything over 47 MP just makes for extra retouching time on skin. Sadly, I've come to the belief that the Q3 is for folks with money to burn. A cash cow for Leica I'm sure with the new batch of 'accessories'... most of which should come with the camera in the first place. Q2 happy here. NOTE: If I were a nature, or architecture guy the Q3 would be THE camera however.
I am sticking with the Q2 - the lens/sensor combo is perfect for me. I’m sure the upgrades will entice a lot more people to buy into Leica (great thing for the rest of us for Leica to make money and continue building what matters😂) The perspective control is on the M11 and it is an amazing feature for the Q3.
From your comment, I can observed, photography is to you just a hobby. 😩 As a pro, I know Q3 can push the highlights, shadows and noiselessness one notch up in extreme light conditions. The tilty screen & 60 megapixels are also for the tourist in you. 🫣
Would love to pick up a Q2 but the starting cost is just too high. I'm going to ease myself into the M system with a M6 perhaps. Agree that it's pointless to compare the X100V to the Q2. Different tools entirely. I kinda wish there was a digital Leica that has a winder (I honestly don't know what for). There's just something nice about the tactile aspect to using a camera with a film winder.
downtown camera (toronto) inadvertently posted Q3 product announcement. they've since pulled it down but leica rumors has it cached. mostly what we've been expecting.
I got a sl2s + sl 50mm f1.4 for my daily + work use (heavy insane!!!). I will definitely go for Q3 half years later to replace my daily use (but still keep sl2s for professional work)
@@kaskoPhoto Another sensible review .Interested in your views on the Phase detect. This was a plus point for me in considering the Q3.I use a SL2s and the poor AF drives me nuts. Now I must admit that I`m using it for medium fast equestrian stuff but its still very frustrating and I couldn`t understand why Leica had installed such a poor AF system in the camera .Having said that I need to look into Phase detect perhaps a little more given your reservations . Thank you .
@@kaskoPhoto I have mix feelings about my SL2s . Principally the weight and the AF .... the later because I`m using it for sports which I don`t think its designed for. I often take my CL and leave the SL2s at home .Although the AF on the CL is not that much better than the SL2s it does have the advantage of being small and light .I`d very much appreciate your insight when / if you manage to put an SL2s through its paces . I may be missing a trick. .
I have a Q2 but have major focusing issues. It is me, not the camera. (I know the Q3 is incrementally better on focus. I am on software release 5.0). What is your secret sauce for tack-sharp images. Manual focus? That is the only way I get sharp images. PS: there is a price drop on the Q2 post Q3 release - down to $4K from $6K.
It’s funny but I actually use autofocus a lot when I am using the Q2. I think if you are coming from a quick autofocus camera like a Nikon or Sony etc… you are probably not taking your time shooting. For me I’m coming from manual focus so the Q is fast 😂 but I still take my time. Just try slowing down.
Having the Q2M and being happy, still thinking about a Q in colour. You will hardly find a better lens/sensor combo. This lens is nothing short but amazing. I mean I love the Zeiss 35/2 on the Sony RX1R2, but hey. So I might wait for the Q3 and see how it does... and then decide if I want to afford it :D
If you decide to buy a Q - Go with the Q1. It's amazing, And the Q2 doesn't have anything that is worth paying almost twice as much. the Q1 has the same photo capabilities, SAME LENS, And has a 24 Mp sensor which is more than enough. Save your money,
@@kaskoPhoto the more megapixels, the more “screwups” are observed. Camera shake, miss focus. I also agree that 47 mp allows more cropping. But if someone needs that much cropping, maybe taking pictures with a 28 is not the right choice… also: does it justify double the price (and the Q base price is $2500… we’re not talking about 600-700 cameras). Picture quality wise? no difference. And high iso and low light, the Q1 is even better in low light actually.
47 vs 60mp isnt quite enough for me to rush to upgrade so it would come down to what else got changed . What I'm actually hoping for is the q2 monochrome dropping.
The disappointment for me with the leaked Q3 designs is the screen not being flush with the body, like Fuji managed to do with the 100V. It becomes a non-issue for those who didn't care for it, and a nice-to-have for those who did. I like to do a lot of waist level shooting so I like the upgrade, even if the implementation is not as elegant as I'd expect from Leica.
@@RichardSilvius I have no idea what a Q3 will look like (assuming the camera is actually launched), but one can’t directly compare camera upgrade paths from different manufacturers. Fuji apparently had the interior space to accommodate a movable screen. Leica seems to densely pack their cameras, so unless something has been further miniaturized, there simply may not be enough space to add a flip screen w/o it protruding a bit from the body.
I love my Q2, if there is anything I desire is a tilt screen. Higher pixel is not necessary, better focusing is nice to have but Leica is not meant to compete with Sony in that category anyway. So, I think pricing is the primary key for Q2 users to consider upgrade.
An interesting take which makes sense regarding the long term viability of the Q2. I’m not sure what you mean by line on your image when using phase detect.
I own both the q2 and q2m with the monochrome being my most used camera by far! While the tilt screen was initially a draw for me once I saw the way the screen was slapped on the back and ruined the aesthetics of the camera, well it was a pass. I get that many will say aesthetics shouldn’t be that important but when you’re paying Leica money, they are! I may revisit this decision when/if a q3m is released but for now I’m keeping the cameras I have.
I believe so. I have an Oberworth on my M11 which has the bottom flap to access the battery and memory but this one has to be removed to access either.
I'm a Q2 user and I don't see the sense for this upgrade to the Q3. For me it we was more interesting a Q3 with a 35mm But I have made beautiful Portraits with the Q2
Looking around the Interwebs, the Q2-and even the original Q-are holding their value, even in light of the Q3 breaking cover. They may even be ticking up a bit, honestly.
It fell already. At least in my market in Asia. Even the white ghost and reporter edition of Q2 has gone down despite brand new. Q1 is in low 1000 euro. This will spread to the western market.
I really want one - have been putting £150 a month aside for some time for a q2 as it’s price will drop soon from people wanting a fast sale to fund the upgrade. Having both - how much better in real terms is the cropping ability of 60mp vs the 47mp
Wow.. that is a tough question. I shot the M11 with the 90 at a concert a few nights ago and had the camera at 60mp with the 1.8 crop on… images were passable. But the 90 as good as it is is no match for that 28 on the Q2. So I would say that it does depend on the lens as much as the deep crop
@@kaskoPhoto the 28mm I have is the Elmarit and it is a superb lens to be honest but I have resorted to a 35/50 on my M8 and a Ricoh GR2 to give me the versatility when travelling instead of swapping lenses
I had a Q2 Monochrom and it was a real pleasure using it. I also have other Leica cameras (CL, SL2, and an M11), but the Q2M was my go to camera. I only sold it because I ordered an M11 Monochrom. If my current finances were slightly different, I’d have kept the Q2M too. It’s that good. I hope to get one again.
@@johnkasianowicz6536 I got an original M Monochrom and it is an absolute delight. It’s a tough call to decide between it or the M8 which to bring with me. I got both for extremely low prices (to the extent you could say the M8 was “free”). I love the idea of the Q system for its versatility though but I’ve found myself loving shooting pure monochrome only
I think the drop in Q2 price the second Q3 comes will make it more appealing for new players. Q1 is even more popular as. I suspect the price will drop further. There is also nothing to suggest these two models will retain value. There are tons of production units. And they are not unique unlike M9 CCD.
@@kaskoPhoto just checked the price in Hong Kong. A brand new black Q2 is 4.3K usd. White ghost is 4.7K. Used black Q2 is 3.8k usd. Q1 is 1.8k usd. It’s dropping in the Asian market rapidly.
@@kaskoPhoto time to buy it from Hong Kong XD. It’s so nice. I am waiting for Q3 to come to sink the price further. Second hand mint goes for 4.3K usd already.
@@kaskoPhoto Glad to help because it seemed as though you were trying to rationalize paying 5K for something that does the same thing as something that’s a fraction of the price. 😂😂😂
The Q2 is fabulous if one's chief criteria is image quality and the industrial design of the camera itself. And the Q3 is a seriously meaningful update. With that being said, what drives me up the wall about Leica is when they chronically elect not to add easy and obvious features/functionalities that are important. For example, the Q3 will move to a hefty 60MP without any redundant internal mechanism for file backup, whilst still using one of the slowest and least reliable card types currently on the market, SD. Moreover, after three iterations now, give the camera a proper AF joystick so one doesn't have to contort their thumb down to the D-Pad when trying to quickly move one's focus point around. Industrial design is great, but function should never follow form.
![Lil Uzi Vert - We Good [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DrSfBULAsek/mqdefault.jpg)
I currently own a Q2 and I agree wholeheartedly. Best camera I've ever owned!!!!
I’m a Fuji medium format shooter w the 50r, 100s and a poop ton of lenses. I bought a Q2 about two months ago and it is the most gorgeous, easy to use camera EVER. My favorite focal length is 27-28mm which I use with my X system. I’m actually selling my 50r in a week or so.
Just ordered a second hand Q2. I'm excited!!
You are going to love it! Just give yourself some time to learn the camera and it’s abilities and shortcomings… then it will be the best you’ve ever owned.
I've had my Q2 a little over 3 years now and taken thousands of photos on it and it's been a lot of places. Usually I'm always first to check out the latest gear but the Q2 still feels highly capable to me and I will be trying the Q3 when it releases but sticking to the Q2 for sure. To your point of it not feeling out dated in a few years I agree. It's already a phenomenal camera.
I’m sure we will both be enjoying for years to come
I hope to buy a used Leica in the next year or two…I use the Q2 at work and adore it. I’m ambivalent about the Q3 upgrades. By the time I buy I could probably go either way used.
Love this camera, great video.
I am on the list for the Q3. Mainly because I want Leica video in a small camera. I have the SL2-S and love it, but a small Q would be fantastic! I currently have the Q2 Reporter and it is fantastic!!!
It sounds like the video on the 3 is really good. My daughter pointed out that it doesn’t have a mic-in but I’m wondering if there is an option for the usb -c to be used for a mic
@@kaskoPhoto Kai W said that there is! Probably slightly after the release.
sold mine, must have been confused, because I've bought another and it's due in 5 days and I'm chomping on the bit. some of my favourite shots ever came off the Q2, including my desktop picture. it's a really great instrument.
I’m right there with you - traded my first Q2 for the M11 and that bought another one 4 weeks later 😂😂
I had the Q2 from March 2019 until last year wonderful camera, I sold it and got the Q2M with color filters. The main reason for this switch is the Q2 at ISO 6400 is maxed out for a usable print At ISO 6400 the Q2M is just getting warmed up
The new Q3 will shoot at 16000 ISO nicely Huge upgrade. The updated AF will be significantly faster
i ordered my Q2 Ghost today and im so happy with my desicion against the q3!
Apples and Tuesdays here, but I see a similarity with the outgoing fuji models.
The chipset for the generation of xt3/xe4/x100v/xpro3 presents a tremendous balance of speed and image size.
So much so that the x100v and xe4 sell more USED than new.
The newer generation of fujis bring 40mp vs 25mp, which introduces less speed, more storage speeds, more detail work, etc,
The only new fuji, the xh2s, that has a 26mp is becoming very popular.
I find that the used market tells a lot about a camera. Look at eBay first for the body under “parts only” seeing how many are listed for parts will give you a very good idea how they hold up. Second look at how many are actually for sale. This varies of course by new model release dates and the occasional fad rush. But getting to the point of used camera, specifically Fuji - the X-T3 / absolutely the best value and still amazing output of them all.
Just picked up a new Q2 from a leica shop in the UK as they offered me a good deal on the disney version ,they also threw in a handgrip and spare battery 📷
Well those two add-ons were worth it alone!
I agree with your observation 80% of the time.
I don't care for tilty screen or sixty megapixels too. They are for tourists. 😆
However, Q3 pushes the limits Q2 can't perform esp under extreme light conditions.
Perhaps you should test a Q3 at 2am. 🤓 Then, you know what I mean.
Totalement d'accord avec toi sur tous les points de ta video.
I just looked at a Q3 to replace my Q2 and decided not to upgrade. That rear screen on the Q3 detracts from the look of the camera. And I don[t need the added megapixels as I shoot with a Fuji 50r an 100s
I was the same way. I love my Q2 and am happy with it. Now the Q3 40mm … def going to consider
What’s wrong with additional features like 60mp and retaining simplicity?
I just love mine, only two weeks in use!
It actually gets better with time 😂
Great job! I love my Q2
I totally agree with you. And based on the rumours, if they are true, Leica thinks the same keeping the Q2 in the line up as an „entry level“ Leica Q system. Let’s see what happens on release date 😊
I don’t think they should retire the Q2 - call it entry level or old… it’s still my favorite
@@kaskoPhoto A Q-E model seems likely, see what they do with the price.
I'm curious to know of the phase detect lines you refer to ? Are you referring to the IR focus assist beams ? I have had my Q3 a week now, but not able to fault the phase detect !! Cheers to you
On some cameras / lighting situations, the phase detect lines appear in images. Nothing to do with IR focus assist. It’s usually the perfect storm but def shows at those times.
Having seen the latest Q3 videos I've been trying hard to think what actual improvements over my Q2 would make me want this... but I could think of none. Tilt screen? No. 8K video on THIS particular camera? No. Wireless charger that is so slow? No. For the portraits I shoot anything over 47 MP just makes for extra retouching time on skin. Sadly, I've come to the belief that the Q3 is for folks with money to burn. A cash cow for Leica I'm sure with the new batch of 'accessories'... most of which should come with the camera in the first place. Q2 happy here. NOTE: If I were a nature, or architecture guy the Q3 would be THE camera however.
I am sticking with the Q2 - the lens/sensor combo is perfect for me. I’m sure the upgrades will entice a lot more people to buy into Leica (great thing for the rest of us for Leica to make money and continue building what matters😂) The perspective control is on the M11 and it is an amazing feature for the Q3.
Modern leicas are cash grabs tho. Nothing that has that “wow” factor
From your comment, I can observed, photography is to you just a hobby. 😩
As a pro, I know Q3 can push the highlights, shadows and noiselessness one notch up in extreme light conditions.
The tilty screen & 60 megapixels are also for the tourist in you. 🫣
@@march69-333 That's funny.
@@march69-333 lmfao “as a pro” 🤣🤣
Would love to pick up a Q2 but the starting cost is just too high. I'm going to ease myself into the M system with a M6 perhaps. Agree that it's pointless to compare the X100V to the Q2. Different tools entirely. I kinda wish there was a digital Leica that has a winder (I honestly don't know what for). There's just something nice about the tactile aspect to using a camera with a film winder.
Well an M6 new or used is a great entry into the system. And I would LOVE a winder.
downtown camera (toronto) inadvertently posted Q3 product announcement. they've since pulled it down but leica rumors has it cached. mostly what we've been expecting.
Do you still own the q2. Is it still worth it?
I got a sl2s + sl 50mm f1.4 for my daily + work use (heavy insane!!!). I will definitely go for Q3 half years later to replace my daily use (but still keep sl2s for professional work)
I still want to spend a day with the SL2s
@@kaskoPhoto Another sensible review .Interested in your views on the Phase detect. This was a plus point for me in considering the Q3.I use a SL2s and the poor AF drives me nuts. Now I must admit that I`m using it for medium fast equestrian stuff but its still very frustrating and I couldn`t understand why Leica had installed such a poor AF system in the camera .Having said that I need to look into Phase detect perhaps a little more given your reservations . Thank you .
@@kaskoPhoto I have mix feelings about my SL2s . Principally the weight and the AF .... the later because I`m using it for sports which I don`t think its designed for. I often take my CL and leave the SL2s at home .Although the AF on the CL is not that much better than the SL2s it does have the advantage of being small and light .I`d very much appreciate your insight when / if you manage to put an SL2s through its paces . I may be missing a trick. .
I have a Q2 but have major focusing issues. It is me, not the camera. (I know the Q3 is incrementally better on focus. I am on software release 5.0). What is your secret sauce for tack-sharp images. Manual focus? That is the only way I get sharp images. PS: there is a price drop on the Q2 post Q3 release - down to $4K from $6K.
It’s funny but I actually use autofocus a lot when I am using the Q2. I think if you are coming from a quick autofocus camera like a Nikon or Sony etc… you are probably not taking your time shooting. For me I’m coming from manual focus so the Q is fast 😂 but I still take my time. Just try slowing down.
Having the Q2M and being happy, still thinking about a Q in colour. You will hardly find a better lens/sensor combo. This lens is nothing short but amazing. I mean I love the Zeiss 35/2 on the Sony RX1R2, but hey. So I might wait for the Q3 and see how it does... and then decide if I want to afford it :D
“If I want to afford it”. 😂 That’s such an on-point comment
@@kaskoPhoto :D
If you decide to buy a Q - Go with the Q1. It's amazing, And the Q2 doesn't have anything that is worth paying almost twice as much. the Q1 has the same photo capabilities, SAME LENS, And has a 24 Mp sensor which is more than enough. Save your money,
Well the 47mp sensor on the 2 is amazing and eliminates some limitations by allowing better image quality in the very useful crop modes.
@@kaskoPhoto the more megapixels, the more “screwups” are observed. Camera shake, miss focus.
I also agree that 47 mp allows more cropping. But if someone needs that much cropping, maybe taking pictures with a 28 is not the right choice… also: does it justify double the price (and the Q base price is $2500… we’re not talking about 600-700 cameras). Picture quality wise? no difference. And high iso and low light, the Q1 is even better in low light actually.
47 vs 60mp isnt quite enough for me to rush to upgrade so it would come down to what else got changed . What I'm actually hoping for is the q2 monochrome dropping.
Currently there’s a pre-owned Q2 directly from the Leica store at $4,300 (and two at $5,000)
I think that’s going to stay there for a while - still a great price though
@@kaskoPhoto you may be correct. Looking forward to seeing new camera on Thursday.
The disappointment for me with the leaked Q3 designs is the screen not being flush with the body, like Fuji managed to do with the 100V. It becomes a non-issue for those who didn't care for it, and a nice-to-have for those who did. I like to do a lot of waist level shooting so I like the upgrade, even if the implementation is not as elegant as I'd expect from Leica.
It will be nice for a lot of people - and I’m hoping the finished camera is a little sleeker as well
If what you say about the screen is true, the body would need to be thicker, which wouldn’t be good.
I’ve seen a 100V, and it doesn’t appeal to me.
@@johnkasianowicz6536 it wasn’t stating fact about the screen just a hope and wish. But I agree with you about the body size.
@@johnkasianowicz6536 I don’t think the 100v is any thicker than the F. I owned both.
@@RichardSilvius I have no idea what a Q3 will look like (assuming the camera is actually launched), but one can’t directly compare camera upgrade paths from different manufacturers. Fuji apparently had the interior space to accommodate a movable screen. Leica seems to densely pack their cameras, so unless something has been further miniaturized, there simply may not be enough space to add a flip screen w/o it protruding a bit from the body.
I love my Q2, if there is anything I desire is a tilt screen. Higher pixel is not necessary, better focusing is nice to have but Leica is not meant to compete with Sony in that category anyway. So, I think pricing is the primary key for Q2 users to consider upgrade.
I get the tilt - not against it but really love the sensor lens combo it has now
An interesting take which makes sense regarding the long term viability of the Q2. I’m not sure what you mean by line on your image when using phase detect.
Phase detect with certain lighting conditions will give you stripes on your images
@@AIP404 Thank you for your insight. So I guess I shouldn’t worry if I get the 3.
@@kaskoPhoto Thank you .
I own both the q2 and q2m with the monochrome being my most used camera by far! While the tilt screen was initially a draw for me once I saw the way the screen was slapped on the back and ruined the aesthetics of the camera, well it was a pass. I get that many will say aesthetics shouldn’t be that important but when you’re paying Leica money, they are! I may revisit this decision when/if a q3m is released but for now I’m keeping the cameras I have.
Hi, are you using the genuine Leica half case? I was thinking about getting one to protect my Q series camera.
I believe so. I have an Oberworth on my M11 which has the bottom flap to access the battery and memory but this one has to be removed to access either.
I'm a Q2 user and I don't see the sense for this upgrade to the Q3.
For me it we was more interesting a Q3 with a 35mm
But I have made beautiful Portraits with the Q2
I would hate a 35 or 50 because I would Have to buy it to go with the 28 on the Q2. 😂 but what an amazing system that would be.
Looking around the Interwebs, the Q2-and even the original Q-are holding their value, even in light of the Q3 breaking cover. They may even be ticking up a bit, honestly.
It fell already. At least in my market in Asia. Even the white ghost and reporter edition of Q2 has gone down despite brand new. Q1 is in low 1000 euro. This will spread to the western market.
I really want one - have been putting £150 a month aside for some time for a q2 as it’s price will drop soon from people wanting a fast sale to fund the upgrade.
Having both - how much better in real terms is the cropping ability of 60mp vs the 47mp
Wow.. that is a tough question. I shot the M11 with the 90 at a concert a few nights ago and had the camera at 60mp with the 1.8 crop on… images were passable. But the 90 as good as it is is no match for that 28 on the Q2. So I would say that it does depend on the lens as much as the deep crop
@@kaskoPhoto the 28mm I have is the Elmarit and it is a superb lens to be honest but I have resorted to a 35/50 on my M8 and a Ricoh GR2 to give me the versatility when travelling instead of swapping lenses
I had a Q2 Monochrom and it was a real pleasure using it. I also have other Leica cameras (CL, SL2, and an M11), but the Q2M was my go to camera. I only sold it because I ordered an M11 Monochrom. If my current finances were slightly different, I’d have kept the Q2M too. It’s that good. I hope to get one again.
@@johnkasianowicz6536 I got an original M Monochrom and it is an absolute delight. It’s a tough call to decide between it or the M8 which to bring with me. I got both for extremely low prices (to the extent you could say the M8 was “free”).
I love the idea of the Q system for its versatility though but I’ve found myself loving shooting pure monochrome only
I think the drop in Q2 price the second Q3 comes will make it more appealing for new players. Q1 is even more popular as. I suspect the price will drop further. There is also nothing to suggest these two models will retain value. There are tons of production units. And they are not unique unlike M9 CCD.
Well you may be right but the first Q is still at 3k+ so we will see.
@@kaskoPhoto just checked the price in Hong Kong. A brand new black Q2 is 4.3K usd. White ghost is 4.7K. Used black Q2 is 3.8k usd. Q1 is 1.8k usd. It’s dropping in the Asian market rapidly.
@@threeamigoshk why would you tell me that! I really want a Ghost!
@@kaskoPhoto time to buy it from Hong Kong XD. It’s so nice. I am waiting for Q3 to come to sink the price further. Second hand mint goes for 4.3K usd already.
@Three Amigos HK are those Leica store prices or maybe Tin Cheung? I’m tempted by a Q2 Mono (living in Mid Levels)
the Q3 are freezing up like the. M11 why spend 6k on a new camera that is broke
I have the sony a7rv similar sensor No freezing
Phase lines always visible? B.S. I could show you a 100 photos taken with different modern cameras and you wouldn’t guess which ones are which!
I’m sure you’re right. Thanks for calling out my crap. 😊
"The only thing they have in common is they take pictures." - Uhhhhhh, isn't that the point of a camera. LOL
Yea, you nailed the point I was making 😂😂
@@kaskoPhoto Glad to help because it seemed as though you were trying to rationalize paying 5K for something that does the same thing as something that’s a fraction of the price. 😂😂😂
The Q2 is fabulous if one's chief criteria is image quality and the industrial design of the camera itself. And the Q3 is a seriously meaningful update.
With that being said, what drives me up the wall about Leica is when they chronically elect not to add easy and obvious features/functionalities that are important. For example, the Q3 will move to a hefty 60MP without any redundant internal mechanism for file backup, whilst still using one of the slowest and least reliable card types currently on the market, SD. Moreover, after three iterations now, give the camera a proper AF joystick so one doesn't have to contort their thumb down to the D-Pad when trying to quickly move one's focus point around. Industrial design is great, but function should never follow form.
If your tall like me (6’8”) the flip screen is a welcomed addition. I wish you could flip the screen away as an option as well.
Well that is a fair point. And damn! 6’8” Mom and dad fed you well 😂😂
@@kaskoPhoto I’m sure it was the power lines! 😂 I also have the m11 and the Visoflex is a life saver for me.