Idk either but I guess it shows how good the 73-9 warriors were because they beat okc after being down 3-1. Kd and russ were pretty good vs the spurs tho I always loved when they matched up in the playoffs
i always thought it was weird that they lost this series but one thing the 2016 playoffs showed us was that when the thunder played smart basketball nobody could really mess with them. They played smart basketball in this series and they played smart basketball in the first four games of the warriors series. Not only were they up 3-1 on the warriors they were dominating them. Then they went back to playing inefficient hero ball and they choked the series away..
@@mauricedavis1740 You are on the surface apparently. The critical game for series was Game 5. Guess who took the Spurs? Russell Westbrook paid the biggest price in the 2010s. If you watch closely Durant, he obviously did not believe this team. He admitted later by himself. On the other hand, GSW can dominate nobody. Great team, excellent shooters but no mentality and resiliency. Only reason of blowing 3-1 lead was Durant. Oh man. The boy is soft. You can't understand it now, a week later, maybe months later. This was the greatest lesson for Presti and OKC. And we assume we did not make the same mistake this time. Hopefully it'll go well.
seeing duncan move so slow was not satisfying even they did break supposed to be miami's grandslam . they were a great team that 2016 but thunder is much younger,faster,hungrier that. time
San Antonio should've won this series. As good as okc was they didn't have the depth or togetherness that spurs did. Sometimes the talent wins though. Westbrook and Durant together were hard to fucking stop
@@cassidyerickson7408agree with the point of depth and togetherness but i doubt that this old spurs could match GSW speed and spacing for the whole series, i know they did beat GSW in the season by holding them under 80pts once , but sustaining the performance for a whole series is completely different shit, and the energy and body that Thunder had provided is the reason why they won 3 times from that gsw
@@cassidyerickson7408agree with the point of depth and togetherness but i doubt that this old spurs could match GSW speed and spacing for the whole series, i know they did beat GSW in the season by holding them under 80pts once , but sustaining the performance for a whole series is completely different shit, and the energy and body that Thunder had provided is the reason why they won 3 times from that gsw
16:30 Good grief, Chris Webber was so annoying here. The dude was so salty that the Spurs lost even though he's supposed to be an unbiased commentator. It was clear as day that he had money on this game, smfh.
Thank you for making this video
The 2015-16 Spurs were one of the best teams ever in terms of adjusted net rating. How the fuck they lost!? Idk...
Idk either but I guess it shows how good the 73-9 warriors were because they beat okc after being down 3-1. Kd and russ were pretty good vs the spurs tho I always loved when they matched up in the playoffs
i always thought it was weird that they lost this series but one thing the 2016 playoffs showed us was that when the thunder played smart basketball nobody could really mess with them. They played smart basketball in this series and they played smart basketball in the first four games of the warriors series. Not only were they up 3-1 on the warriors they were dominating them. Then they went back to playing inefficient hero ball and they choked the series away..
The Thunder matured and we’re athletically superior to the Spurs
@@mauricedavis1740 You are on the surface apparently. The critical game for series was Game 5. Guess who took the Spurs? Russell Westbrook paid the biggest price in the 2010s. If you watch closely Durant, he obviously did not believe this team. He admitted later by himself. On the other hand, GSW can dominate nobody. Great team, excellent shooters but no mentality and resiliency. Only reason of blowing 3-1 lead was Durant. Oh man. The boy is soft. You can't understand it now, a week later, maybe months later. This was the greatest lesson for Presti and OKC. And we assume we did not make the same mistake this time. Hopefully it'll go well.
@@dillatronic4757 bogus if he was the problem then why did yall never make it out the first round with russ ha. till this day never past round 2 bozo
Andre Roberson is great
Tony parker was selling on these games wtf
seeing duncan move so slow was not satisfying even they did break supposed to be miami's grandslam . they were a great team that 2016 but thunder is much younger,faster,hungrier that. time
San Antonio should've won this series. As good as okc was they didn't have the depth or togetherness that spurs did. Sometimes the talent wins though. Westbrook and Durant together were hard to fucking stop
@@cassidyerickson7408agree with the point of depth and togetherness but i doubt that this old spurs could match GSW speed and spacing for the whole series, i know they did beat GSW in the season by holding them under 80pts once , but sustaining the performance for a whole series is completely different shit, and the energy and body that Thunder had provided is the reason why they won 3 times from that gsw
@@cassidyerickson7408agree with the point of depth and togetherness but i doubt that this old spurs could match GSW speed and spacing for the whole series, i know they did beat GSW in the season by holding them under 80pts once , but sustaining the performance for a whole series is completely different shit, and the energy and body that Thunder had provided is the reason why they won 3 times from that gsw
16:30 Good grief, Chris Webber was so annoying here. The dude was so salty that the Spurs lost even though he's supposed to be an unbiased commentator. It was clear as day that he had money on this game, smfh.
pure luck on OKC esp Westbrook
Cry some more