I Asked ChatGPT To Build Me a Website
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 июл 2023
- So I asked ChatGPT if it could build me a website for my fictional flower shop business and it went about as I had planned.
Hope you enjoyed the video!
Check out some code on my GitHub:
github.com/realtux
github.com/engineer-man/youtube
Other Social:
/ engineerman
/ _engineerman
/ discord 
Наука
Would you hire ChatGPT for your next project?
Do you happen to have a video or link on how you got the stable diffusion model and how you set that up? Great video as always thank you!
No, I would not.
What I do, though, is use it as a tool to be faster and more productive. It's been very helpful in my efforts to transition from C to C++, for example. It helps me go faster because I can ask it to explain concepts and provide sample snipets on how to implement those concepts, but it definitely can't provide even the simplest application. Just snipets of ideas or concepts which is actually very useful.
how did you got that stable diffusion model?
No because my project would have the least consistent formatting / organization physically possible. Half my units would be rem, half would be px, half would be bootstrap, half would be normal css, half would use "|", half would use "??"... It's already plaguing our project 😅
Little did you know, chatGPT is just a bunch of call centers in India and not an actual A.I.
I work for those call center. Ig I have to improve my knowledge of web development.
They are fast as hell in India haha😂
😂😂😂
AI = _Actually India_ 😄
halo how can i prooompt you?
Today I learned Engineer Man's job is still safe.
Nice work!
Couple of thoughts from my experience. More often than not once you get "deep enough" things will start to break and it becomes a battle. Could be incorrect classes, or ids, variables in programming languages, etc. It also often will acknowledge it made xyz mistake but it doesn't persist the session meaning it will keep making the mistake, even if explicitly provided guidelines. The "it knows it made a mistake"is a facade - it will tell you you're right even if you're maliciously wrong.
Absolutely, it cannot be trusted. It will tell you anything it wants with the utmost confidence.
Great video , Did you create the gradio UI for stable diffusion . If its open source , would love a link of the project . Thanks
How did you get that version of stable diffusion?
That was pretty much what I would expect, kind of handy but not really that handy. Either of us could have done it manually pretty close to the time it took back and forth with chatGPT, especially considering you'd probably want a db behind that so now you can use a loop for the images, I could do that lickety split. Would be a fair starting point though for someone who really didn't know what they were doing or how to do it or someone who just wants the boilerplate to manually manipulate.
great video! have been wanting to see someone with real coding knowledge give this a go.
would love to see if you can find any applications where it is faster/better at anything, and of course also where it just absolutely fails.
Very good .. I’d recommend adding a diary reminder to repeat this exercise in 6 - 12 months time and see how fast it improves. Keep up the great work 😀👍
I've Learnt So Much From Your Videos!
Would like to see how it goes with GPT4 instead of 3.5
hi, i wanted to ask what os do you use? doesn't look like windows
What the server name for generated ai images ?
The speed at which you get "something" is impressive, but I wonder how much faster you would've just written it all yourself. I wonder what is more tedious, typing it out manually or constantly having to ask ChatGPT to fix things?
I use ChatGPT a lot to create snippets that I can modify for my purposes. In a lot of ways it just makes sure I am pulling in the correct calls and syntax faster than I would take if I was looking through documentation. That said, a more full featured IDE (instead of VS Code) would probably do the same thing without the need to switch windows.
nice! you go threw the process so quickly neatly. wish i was that good at programming.
Can you do more videos where you troll the scammers with a fake site while being on a call with them ?
You seem to have had better luck than me. But tbf I did attempt it around the time it was released to the public. It's gotten a bit better I'd say.
This was a very entertaining video. 👍
Glad to see more of your videos. Once I wrote a minecraft bot in python using chatgpt. It took a ton of troubleshooting and pointing it in the right direction with prompts and corrections. It ended up requiring some manual coding anyway but did save a little time on the initial layout. Would not hire chatgpt as a fulltime employee, but it can be useful as an intern to do the menial stuff.
I love ur vids Engineer man
try with gpt4
I mean...funnily enough this is enough to appease a web design professor.
How do I ask ChatGPT to do that for me without knowing coded? Where to copy and paste?
Enjoyed the vid
8:08 back in the day chatgpt wouldve provided jquery automatically the 3,5 quality is low
9:46 idem for the classes
I tried to apply chatgpt in my work, to figure out programming in freecad api. I stopped when he started to invent new functions. The time I spent on it tweaking I could spent to figure it out on my own. And then, of course, I spent this said time again.
I would like you to redo this video but be a lot more explicit in your prompts. I don't think this was a real reflection on how to utilize good prompts to get the most out of chatgpt. I think it did great for the prompts you gave it to.
The paid version of GPT 4 model is better than free 3.5 model.
It's better to live your whole life as a billionaire, than one day as a homeless guy.
every 60 seconds in africa, a minute passes
@@camalejao According to Einstein's theory of Relativity, it depends on how fast you move.
Is it simple to run Stable Diffusion locally?
As it turns out, yes. Just install stable diffusion webui and get some models from civitai.com.
It seems to only be getting worse, or it’s just becoming more obvious as the flaws become more apparentrent.
He's back!
Thank you for helping me to decide whether I wanted to unsubscribe to you or not.
You're using 3.5 instead of 4 though.
I'm using the freely available one.
I think all generative AI follows the rule of: You get what you give. Give it simple input requests and it'll give simple output request to achieve a solution. I've found giving it richer input for more nuanced requests helps immensely. Just depends on how well you can communicate what you need.
Yeah chat gpt would be good at generating example code/html, but not professionally looking ones
It seems they've improved ChatGPT for coding. A few months ago when I tried using it to generate some code it wouldn't tell me that "code before/after remains unchanged", which is a cool detail. And it'd often stop in the middle if it gave me too much code (often happened when it wanted to give me all ALL the code/boilerplate) and getting it to continue from that point was really messy and buggy, and the code before/after continuing was almost like 2 different codebases. Now there's an option to just "continue generating" which is cool and I'm guessing helps ChatGPT stay within the same context so it's more reliable.
Insane..
I was waiting for Engineer Man to make fun of this thing.
why are u using V3.5 🙄🙄
Cuz free.
Could you please explain in a future video how exactly Chat GPT works? How is it able to think and respond to almost every question in such an improvised way?
very cool ty 8)
It's not going to replace programmers, yet.
Saying that ChatGTP will replace programmers is the same as saying that AC current will replace DC in 1880s. It eventually did.
One thing it's great for is automation to help coders. Yesterday, I got tired of referring to the Tailwind cheatsheet when converting classes back to native CSS. I had a nice pair programming session with ChatGPT, with it doing all the grunt work while I made clarifications. 😂
ChatGPT is a tool just like any other. Some people are seriously overblowing its ability to steal people’s jobs. How many artists did Photoshop replace?
Yeah, as you can see, chatgpt is a tool. The problem is that most people are thinking about using a tool to substitute a person, which is stupid.
Chatgpt will not substitute any developers job. It can be used as a tool since, as we can see, you still have to know what you are doing.
i wonder what will happen if we do the same thing again in 2040 🤔
Hi
I find the strength of chatgpt is not in writing code for me, but in validating how things work and offering suggestions on how to do things better. If you treat it like a more experienced co-worker, it's silly NOT to use it.
Glad to be here early!
ChatGPT will REPLACE programmers...you just wait and see.
Oh we will all wait and see for sure... that it won't. But hey. Everyone's free to speculate.