I love science and videos about breakthroughs but why when you watch one do you have to sit thru a recap of everything that ever happened? its like "the new pictures of the moon are great, we first saw the moon thousands pf years ago..." i get they like to do that for new viewers but i wish there was a button that said "new" or "experienced" they would take you to what you need to see.
You can always skip instead of complaining. And context is important, because how else would you know what’s so impressive about just new pictures. Besides it’s a 6 minute video, I don’t think it’s that much of a waste of time. If you want to just see the pictures google them, seems like an in depth explanation isn’t for you.
Why all the CGI? Why all the colour enhancement. More often than not the colours are completely fictional? More interesting should be the actual images. Rarely published...
For twenty years I prayed I would live long enough to see these remarkable images and I made it, now I watch in awe. Technology has come a long way since Armstrong stood in the moon. It's been a pleasure to watch NASA in it's journey. Thanks for that summary, as always very enjoyable.
Not forgetting ESA who provided the Ariane 5 launch vehicle and 2 of the 4 instruments, and CSA who provided sensors and various other parts of equipment. But yes, a pleasure to watch NASA collaborate with other countries to make it all possible.
@@bidensucks2922 Bravo, you wield the English language with such grace and mastery. Now, seeing as your contribution to humanity in this instance is literally nothing, I will bid you good day and hope that you have a long and fruitful life. Preferably of butterfly length.
Words cannot describe the Awesomeness , the Wonder, the Beauty, the Imagination, the Wisdom, the Discoveries that this Outstanding Piece of Engineering and Scientific Technolgy is going to bring forth to the eyes and curious minds of mankind !!! FABULOUS !!!
Is this really how these images would actually look to the naked eye? I really feel these images are being spruced up and beautified. The colors we’re looking at in these images are artificial, and aren’t how the objects would appear in reality.
These are the first images I've seen from the James Webb telescope - they're literally jaw dropping. I'm 54 yrs old, and I've had the pleasure of experiencing the steps we've made in finding ways to see with more distance and clarity. I remember being a kid in the 1970's, and the deep feeling of awe as I studied every image of Mars that the Voyager satellites gave us. I now have a huge collection of images taken on the surface of Mars by all the rovers that are there now. My favorite is a picture of a Martian sunset in which you can see the Earth as a small blue dot - I have a large print of it on my living room wall, and it makes me feel so lucky to be living here and now. We can see things that humanity couldn't even dream of for most of our existence.
"Star formation is not fully understood..'" I have a few questions of my own that I have never found answers to. 1: Where is the raw hydrogen coming from? I thought everything out there now is from multiple generations of previous supernovas. 2: Do supernovas produce a bunch more free hydrogen in addition to heavy elements? 3: Gas tries to spread out and separate from other gas molecules. How can it gather together in the vacuum of space and compress on itself until fusion occurs?
So star formation happend at the beggining of the universe it happend when you look through a telescope u see the light from the past today there are some hydrogen clouds that form stars From what i know supernovas dont produce hydrogen Because some conditions are met preasure and heat parricle clump togherter having a bigger mass and a bigger impact on gravity wich ateacts more molecules to the gas clupmp
*Scott:* _"Gas tries to spread out and separate from other gas molecules. How can it gather together in the vacuum of space and compress on itself until fusion occurs?"_ Excellent question. I'm no physicist, but my understanding is that gas pressure is much stronger than gravity at great distances, so it should be impossible to overcome it to form a star. So what overcame it? How did any star ever form?
@Kalashnikov: _"Eventually it explodes creating lighter form of elements."_ Black holes explode? I'm not saying they don't, but I've never heard this before. That would seem to violate the axiom that nothing can escape a black hole. Has it ever happened?
I know about that kind of radiation, @Kalashnikov. It results from the intense gravity acting on passing high energy photons which are split into an electron and a positron (anti-electron) in a process called "pair production". (I first learned about this in 1978 in Navy Nuclear Power School.) If it happens near the event horizon, one particle gets sucked in and the other get's flung away, which looks like radiation, even though it originated outside the event horizon. But your explanation doesn't make sense. Wouldn't an approximately equal percentage of electrons and positrons get sucked in, which would cancel? Second, regardless of what happens, my understanding is that black holes ONLY have mass, spin and charge. There's no characterization for percentage of antimatter, right? So what's happening inside that could possibly destabilize them? As an aside, if the black hole is charged, wouldn't it tend to slightly attract the particle of opposite charge and slightly repel the particle of same charge? That should tend to reduce the black hole's charge over time.
@Kalashnikov: _"If nothing escapes black hole then there would have been no radiation around black hole."_ The radiation to which you refer does NOT escape from the black hole. It originates OUTSIDE the event horizon. As far as I understand, anti-particles have the same kind of gravity as other particles. That is, there's no such thing as anti-gravity. Am I right in this understanding? Can you at least give me a hint what mechanism destabilizes the black hole?
The tightly packed dust “globules” that birth stars are technically named Bok Globules, after the astronomer, Bartholomeus Jan "Bart" Bok, the Dutch-American scientist that’s postulated them. His theory was confirmed shortly before his death in 1983. Fortunately, I was able to meet him and attend a lecture given by him in the early 1980s at the University of Washington; a very charming man.
Mankind can now learn more about the birth of stars, galaxies and the Planets in a realistic way. Thanks to the slew of telescopes launched in recent times including James Webb.
I’d like to see more of those Visible/Infra-Red comparisons, as time goes on. Visible images are beautiful graphics, but it’s wonderful to see what;s out there when you clear away the dust. Thanks!
The problem with NASA is that they won’t allow us to see the most exciting stuff. If they detect or actually see signs of life, the military and the CIA will not allow them to release it.
The Orion Nebula is cool. I'm still grappling with the Horsehead Nebula looking more like a mushroom cloud now than like a chess piece, but the images I really want to see are spectroscopic analyses of exoplanets' atmospheres in case any of them have components hard to explain other than by life. I know conditions have to be just right in order for the analysis to happen and it could take a while.
@@themacocko6311 Nice, I hadn’t heard of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope until now. It looks nuts. It’s supposed to see planets directly, and will have a field of view 100 times greater than the Hubble. I will say that they just signed the contract and claim to be gunning for a 2026 launch. That’s pretty quick, so hopefully the Roman telescope isn’t like Musk’s Model 3, because it’ll be falling apart on the way up.
Actually, JWST is nowhere near the Hubble yet, when it comes to all the pioneering & ground breaking images we have obtained. Nearly all the images made available from JWST are simply retakes of images that Hubble had already imaged. JWST cost $10 billion and took 25 years to build, so there will naturally be a lot of self-aggrandizing & hype to justify all those gargantuan costs. Majority of the images we have seen so far are a little bit sharper, compared to Hubble; however, that improvement in sharpness can hardly justify those costs. Still waiting to see/learn about early universe images & Milky Way bulge images, areas that JWST was designed to help astronomers explore.
I'm interested in close interesting stars that might be habitable, have life, intelligent life, and even a technological culture on a par or more advanced than ours.
Nice dream pal. We live in a simulation, the creators of simulation will determine if we ever will see somewhat close to other ¨intellegent¨ life as your describing.
@@roflmao2661 I believe we’re somewhat in a simulation but not exactly a virtual reality that we’re familiar. Our soul is the entity using our body as an avatar to experience this Earth.
@@mikewhocheeseharry5292 Nicely put! Children can comprehend the concept "simulation" in today's "gamed reality". The rational-minded have focused contemporary life on Big Tech models--- computer simulations of reality. If you examine such things as "inflation" or "recession" you will realize just how limited these simulated models(Economics/Finance) are. We IMAGINE concepts that are placed into the consciousness by experts/authorities/institutions that have indoctrinated us away from the gifts that evolution has developed in us--- for what? Simulated reality? _Synchronistic mathematics_ reveals another reality just beyond out rational mind--- a mystery of sorts that can be decoded, using mathematics and subjective direct observation. It is difficult to indoctrinate someone with a developed ability for creativity and insight. 👀🐡🌼🌾🌿 cc
The James Webb images we've all been waiting for are the answers if Proxima B has an Earth-like atmosphere and in this Alpha Centauri system is there more planets
Really good worthy video. The transition segment gives little time to freeze everything so as to "like" and comment. Most RUclips videos suffer from this transition problem.
I'm not associated, but if you type: RUclips, Thunderbolts Project, you'll see extensive evidence of different explanations of star formation, power source.
I was wondering if they could take a picture of earth seen that the telescope are so far away from us. It would be nice to see a real photograph from that perspective.
I wish videos like these would show more actual pictures of what the title says instead of a bunch of computer generated graphics, There was about 55 seconds total of the Webb image in this 6 1/2 minute video.
Is this really what we were all waiting for? I don't know about you but I'm waiting for exoplanet pictures. I know they won't be detailed but they'll be a few pixels and you know what? That's honestly awesome. But I'm actually kind of sad we can't see detailed pictures of exoplanets but what are you going to do? There is no known way to do that yet.
It'd be interesting to know if inhabitants on planets, around stars, in nebulae, see there's a difference in space and it's color. From inside a nebula vs not being inside a nebula.
The big question no one is asking. Where did the molecular mass of the Orion cluster come from? We've always assumed that the clouds of mass come from supernova of existing stars. That would be a pretty big star to create that massive amount of molecular cloud.
Why does it have to be just one star? Q: "Where did the molecular mass of the Orion cluster come from?" A: Millions and billions of stars, over billions of years.
Right at 4:54, pause it. Cross your eyes so the images overlap perfectly and where the clouds are shaped the same, pay attention. Please enjoy! I have a video on this on my channel🥰
have you noticed that this telescope can look “back in time” but they never point it to Alpha Centauri (the nearest place that should have an earth like planet) or to the Sagittarius constellation (where the mysterious “wow signal” came)? 🤔
From what I heard certain scientists got in line so the telescope focuses only on one area for x time then moved on as requested so that area has not been mapped yet. The telescope hadn't been online that long.
I think they have taken a look at Alpha Centaury B! They are saying that the JWST may have detected artificial light on the planet orbiting it! If true, that is a monumental discovery! Best wishes to you and yours!
The origin of the WOW signal is not known with certainty. There are two fairly large patches of sky the antenna could have been pointed at when the signal was received. The JWST images a tiny spot in the sky. Just saying "the Sagittarius constellation" isn't anywhere near precise enough.
Great news! One Q. ? About the Xoplanet ..... With that size of 12 x the mass of Jupiter,. What would keep that planet from going into Nuclear fusion ? And collapsing under its own gravity?
When the JWST starts really looking back into the early Universe (the first 100 million years) it will see so many galaxies so close together. It is going to see nothing but galaxies. The old Universe (all the mass in a small, maybe earth sized) became, for a short time, a Galaxy Creating Machine! The first thing that this machine did was create one large spiral galaxy with a black hole in the center, between both Sides (of the old Universe, it was an inside job >smile< soon to be new universe) pushing full blast against each other (We should all know because We all had to >smile again< choose sides back then and probably push with all our mental might! We all (all the Beings in this/old Universe) knew what was happening; We were all there; We are all eternal; where else would We all have been at this moment, with our Awareness & Consciousness, We had no form.) creating that first large spiral galaxy with one very large black hole in the center)! The tremendous stress blew both Sides into countless Pieces, each Piece pushing on those near it creating many, many more spiral galaxies (elliptical galaxies got created mostly when the galaxies were close together there were many collisions and that left two elliptical galaxies going on their merry way; and one larger black hole or two black holes orbiting each other going their own way) and other matter. Elliptical galaxies got created in another way where three progenitors act on each other such that the galaxy is created with all the gas being stripped out by the creation) The Progenitors (the old Universe in pieces) that created all this are Quasars now. Most Quasars pushed each other to the perimeter of our new Universe. From there they they form a basket like pattern all around the new Universe. They are responsible for our gravity and moving electromagnetic vibrations and much more. Some Quasars stalled and remained in the physical Universe. The JWST will allow Us to understand what happened back then. We all can see, as well, that We were always a part of whatever this Universe was/is involved in… “out of the One many, out of the many One”
Appreciated for being strait to the point and showing the image not talking about webb's full history , that is getting old. after all im not here for a history lesson just want to see the image lmao
Thing is.. you need a black hole in order to pull in gravity around it and to hold the gas and matter, so that's how stars and galaxy's form . Certain stars eventually become black holes themselves.. and so the cycle continues.. soooooo how exactly did the first stars form? .. how can you have a black hole BEFORE the first star was even created? ..
you dont need a black hole to form stars. you just need dust and gas to clump together and eventually the bigger that clump gets, it'll have it's own gravity. then it'll attract more dust and gas and it'll collapse under the gravity to form a star
@1:35 It would seem you are still following the old gravimetric model of star formation that has been debunked. Our Plasma Universe has a different mechanism. Do your homework. Birkeland Currents, Z- pinch, etc...
It appears that the large vertical gas & dust so said clouds in the Orion Nebula, are attracted to the Quasar stream from another nearby Galaxy. It appears the clouds are attracted to the Quasar Stream, then the Quasar stream runs throughout the center of centered cloud formations of many Elemental fruits. Clearing out the center of the clouds, as the clouds form around & are attracted to the outer radiance of the Quasar stream. Then the Nebula Clouds attracted to the outside of the Quasar stream & meet pressure from the Quasar higher up. Which causes the Nebula Clouds to flow away from the Quasar Stream at the top of the formations of the Nebula Clouds. Then the other Nebula Clouds around the main Nebula Clouds attracted to the Quasar, are attracted to the Nebula Clouds that are most attracted to the Quasar. This should indicate that the elements in the Nebula Clouds around the Quasar are either heaviest or lightest types of Elemental Organic Materials positive Producing cloud formations. Which indicates that the Nebula Clouds around the the main Nebula Cloud most attracted to the Quasar, are going to form different kinds of Solar Systems that are either heaviest or lightest Weight Based. It may be that the elements cloud nearest the Quasar are lighter materials that are easier to move to the center in attracted flows & motion. But could also be the heaviest as the Quasar Stream may actively push lighter materials away from the Quasar easier. Or that the elements attracted most to the Quasar Stream have a specific energy force that attracts to the lighted ionic flow of materials of the Quasar. Which may be cold flowing at that point.
These "scientists" should be focusing on the fact that the Big Bang is in serious disrepute due to finding out that galaxies near the beginning of the "Big Bang" appear to be younger than some galaxies closer in.
I love science and videos about breakthroughs but why when you watch one do you have to sit thru a recap of everything that ever happened? its like "the new pictures of the moon are great, we first saw the moon thousands pf years ago..." i get they like to do that for new viewers but i wish there was a button that said "new" or "experienced" they would take you to what you need to see.
If you click the gear icon in the lower right, you can select double time to speed through it.
yeah fr
You can always skip instead of complaining. And context is important, because how else would you know what’s so impressive about just new pictures. Besides it’s a 6 minute video, I don’t think it’s that much of a waste of time. If you want to just see the pictures google them, seems like an in depth explanation isn’t for you.
Why all the CGI? Why all the colour enhancement. More often than not the colours are completely fictional?
More interesting should be the actual images. Rarely published...
@@jifri5901 you could always try shutting your mouth, the man has a point
For twenty years I prayed I would live long enough to see these remarkable images and I made it, now I watch in awe. Technology has come a long way since Armstrong stood in the moon. It's been a pleasure to watch NASA in it's journey. Thanks for that summary, as always very enjoyable.
Not forgetting ESA who provided the Ariane 5 launch vehicle and 2 of the 4 instruments, and CSA who provided sensors and various other parts of equipment. But yes, a pleasure to watch NASA collaborate with other countries to make it all possible.
@@RatBagDad Shuddap
@@bidensucks2922 You seem like a lovely person, I'll wager you bring happiness to the day of every person you encounter.
@@RatBagDad run along child 🧒
@@bidensucks2922 Bravo, you wield the English language with such grace and mastery. Now, seeing as your contribution to humanity in this instance is literally nothing, I will bid you good day and hope that you have a long and fruitful life. Preferably of butterfly length.
Words cannot describe the Awesomeness , the Wonder, the Beauty, the Imagination, the Wisdom, the Discoveries that this Outstanding Piece of Engineering and Scientific Technolgy is going to bring forth to the eyes and curious minds of mankind !!! FABULOUS !!!
It's destroying the big bang theory 100%
Yes, I agree. It really is fabulous!
@@roflmao2661 Now now! 🙂
Is this really how these images would actually look to the naked eye? I really feel these images are being spruced up and beautified. The colors we’re looking at in these images are artificial, and aren’t how the objects would appear in reality.
@SteveNegley FJB That is only a belief.
These are the first images I've seen from the James Webb telescope - they're literally jaw dropping. I'm 54 yrs old, and I've had the pleasure of experiencing the steps we've made in finding ways to see with more distance and clarity. I remember being a kid in the 1970's, and the deep feeling of awe as I studied every image of Mars that the Voyager satellites gave us. I now have a huge collection of images taken on the surface of Mars by all the rovers that are there now. My favorite is a picture of a Martian sunset in which you can see the Earth as a small blue dot - I have a large print of it on my living room wall, and it makes me feel so lucky to be living here and now. We can see things that humanity couldn't even dream of for most of our existence.
Congratulations for 500k subscribers!!🥳🥳
Thank you buddy!
Great narrating my man, and nice setup with the video!
Images of the stars with only one cgi of the web. Much better, really much better !👍👍
"Star formation is not fully understood..'" I have a few questions of my own that I have never found answers to. 1: Where is the raw hydrogen coming from? I thought everything out there now is from multiple generations of previous supernovas. 2: Do supernovas produce a bunch more free hydrogen in addition to heavy elements? 3: Gas tries to spread out and separate from other gas molecules. How can it gather together in the vacuum of space and compress on itself until fusion occurs?
So star formation happend at the beggining of the universe it happend when you look through a telescope u see the light from the past today there are some hydrogen clouds that form stars
From what i know supernovas dont produce hydrogen
Because some conditions are met preasure and heat parricle clump togherter having a bigger mass and a bigger impact on gravity wich ateacts more molecules to the gas clupmp
*Scott:* _"Gas tries to spread out and separate from other gas molecules. How can it gather together in the vacuum of space and compress on itself until fusion occurs?"_
Excellent question. I'm no physicist, but my understanding is that gas pressure is much stronger than gravity at great distances, so it should be impossible to overcome it to form a star. So what overcame it? How did any star ever form?
@Kalashnikov: _"Eventually it explodes creating lighter form of elements."_
Black holes explode? I'm not saying they don't, but I've never heard this before. That would seem to violate the axiom that nothing can escape a black hole. Has it ever happened?
I know about that kind of radiation, @Kalashnikov. It results from the intense gravity acting on passing high energy photons which are split into an electron and a positron (anti-electron) in a process called "pair production". (I first learned about this in 1978 in Navy Nuclear Power School.) If it happens near the event horizon, one particle gets sucked in and the other get's flung away, which looks like radiation, even though it originated outside the event horizon.
But your explanation doesn't make sense. Wouldn't an approximately equal percentage of electrons and positrons get sucked in, which would cancel? Second, regardless of what happens, my understanding is that black holes ONLY have mass, spin and charge. There's no characterization for percentage of antimatter, right? So what's happening inside that could possibly destabilize them?
As an aside, if the black hole is charged, wouldn't it tend to slightly attract the particle of opposite charge and slightly repel the particle of same charge? That should tend to reduce the black hole's charge over time.
@Kalashnikov: _"If nothing escapes black hole then there would have been no radiation around black hole."_
The radiation to which you refer does NOT escape from the black hole. It originates OUTSIDE the event horizon.
As far as I understand, anti-particles have the same kind of gravity as other particles. That is, there's no such thing as anti-gravity. Am I right in this understanding?
Can you at least give me a hint what mechanism destabilizes the black hole?
The tightly packed dust “globules” that birth stars are technically named Bok Globules, after the astronomer, Bartholomeus Jan "Bart" Bok, the Dutch-American scientist that’s postulated them. His theory was confirmed shortly before his death in 1983. Fortunately, I was able to meet him and attend a lecture given by him in the early 1980s at the University of Washington; a very charming man.
gratulerer
Thanks for your comment. You've given more information than the writer of this video.
Webb is doing wonders. Please post more videos
Great video thanks . Hope for more stunning images from the Webb space telescope.
More to come!
@@TheSecretsoftheUniverse great will be watching it for sure 🙂
Mankind can now learn more about the birth of stars, galaxies and the Planets in a realistic way. Thanks to the slew of telescopes launched in recent times including James Webb.
I am curious the scientist believe new stars are formed.
Law of One by Ra. give that read, about how stars and planets are formed....
I’d like to see more of those Visible/Infra-Red comparisons, as time goes on. Visible images are beautiful graphics, but it’s wonderful to see what;s out there when you clear away the dust. Thanks!
Yes, I agree. It is amazing!!
ruclips.net/video/0QRGrXt0aJs/видео.html
🎉ITS FINALLY HERE🎉
The problem with NASA is that they won’t allow us to see the most exciting stuff. If they detect or actually see signs of life, the military and the CIA will not allow them to release it.
@Josh Smith what do you mean? Aliens!!!
Love the images. Space is so beautiful.🛸🪐🌠
As usual, another fascinating insight into star formation. Excellent info and photos. JWT is certainly delivering the goods!!
These images are amazing and magnificent.
Shella62=at 5:30he says the star is 15_20billions years old,I they always said 12-14 years old ?
Thanks for making professional and laid back content.
The Orion Nebula is cool. I'm still grappling with the Horsehead Nebula looking more like a mushroom cloud now than like a chess piece, but the images I really want to see are spectroscopic analyses of exoplanets' atmospheres in case any of them have components hard to explain other than by life. I know conditions have to be just right in order for the analysis to happen and it could take a while.
or made out of carbon. and how dumb are humans compared to how much knowledge there is or truth
Outstanding explanation! Thanks to you we know more about stars formation and about how James Webb works.
Thank you!
Me too!
Awesome! Please keep it coming.
The Hubble was a big deal when it was first a thing that puts into perspective just how amazing the James Webb telescope is
I hear Musk has made a telescope that puts James Webb telescope to shame.
@@themacocko6311 Nice, I hadn’t heard of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope until now. It looks nuts. It’s supposed to see planets directly, and will have a field of view 100 times greater than the Hubble.
I will say that they just signed the contract and claim to be gunning for a 2026 launch. That’s pretty quick, so hopefully the Roman telescope isn’t like Musk’s Model 3, because it’ll be falling apart on the way up.
Actually, JWST is nowhere near the Hubble yet, when it comes to all the pioneering & ground breaking images we have obtained. Nearly all the images made available from JWST are simply retakes of images that Hubble had already imaged.
JWST cost $10 billion and took 25 years to build, so there will naturally be a lot of self-aggrandizing & hype to justify all those gargantuan costs.
Majority of the images we have seen so far are a little bit sharper, compared to Hubble; however, that improvement in sharpness can hardly justify those costs.
Still waiting to see/learn about early universe images & Milky Way bulge images, areas that JWST was designed to help astronomers explore.
@@tropickman The Hubble telescope changed the way we look at the universe like no other man made object.
@@themacocko6311 Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will be built by NASA and GSFC.
I watched the video in 144p. Take that NASA!
It is so crazy how beautiful, scary, and real these are. Always so amazed by what we have here on earth and in space.
It looks like an explosion in which the star has pushed dust away more than it looks like a star gathering dust.
Extremely Cool thanks for sharing my friend
I'm interested in close interesting stars that might be habitable, have life, intelligent life, and even a technological culture on a par or more advanced than ours.
Nice dream pal. We live in a simulation, the creators of simulation will determine if we ever will see somewhat close to other ¨intellegent¨ life as your describing.
@@roflmao2661 I’m thinking your the one dreaming.
@@roflmao2661 I believe we’re somewhat in a simulation but not exactly a virtual reality that we’re familiar. Our soul is the entity using our body as an avatar to experience this Earth.
@@mikewhocheeseharry5292 Well said buddy
@@mikewhocheeseharry5292 Nicely put! Children can comprehend the concept "simulation" in today's "gamed reality". The rational-minded have focused contemporary life on Big Tech models--- computer simulations of reality. If you examine such things as "inflation" or "recession" you will realize just how limited these simulated models(Economics/Finance) are. We IMAGINE concepts that are placed into the consciousness by experts/authorities/institutions that have indoctrinated us away from the gifts that evolution has developed in us--- for what? Simulated reality?
_Synchronistic mathematics_ reveals another reality just beyond out rational mind--- a mystery of sorts that can be decoded, using mathematics and subjective direct observation. It is difficult to indoctrinate someone with a developed ability for creativity and insight. 👀🐡🌼🌾🌿
cc
w o w! This is the BEST video yet about space & time. BEST!!!
Fascinating. Thank you so much for this.
The JWST is turning out to be a fabulous addition to our astronomical armamentarium.
I LOVE your VIDS! I wanna keep you in my pocket!!!
Used to dream each night floating through lights like this when I was really little. Can’t explain it,
Same here.
Mom told you “no pizza before bed”! But did you listen? No.
The James Webb images we've all been waiting for are the answers if Proxima B has an Earth-like atmosphere and in this Alpha Centauri system is there more planets
Whats the time stamp of the image? I don't have time for this.
So informative, love this channel…..thank you xx🇬🇧💕xx
Thanks for watching!
I would love to see such clarity of our own home
24 hrs a day , wow it will
Never happen never , all the pretty picture
really. The ISS has a live stream 24 hours a day of your home. well not your home but of earth lmao.
My favorite of all Nebulas!
Really good worthy video. The transition segment gives little time to freeze everything so as to "like" and comment. Most RUclips videos suffer from this transition problem.
4:52 those dark dots are black holes?
would be nice if you had a higher resolution.
NICE 👍 Point the telescope & let your imagination run free.
It looks like heaven
Really. You know that. Good for you.lots of people don’t believe in heaven.
Thank you so much 🙏
Omg that is my background on my computer :o
How are two pictures of different span of time be taken like at same exact position?
Cool. Thanks for sharing.
I'm not associated, but if you type: RUclips, Thunderbolts Project, you'll see extensive evidence of different explanations of star formation, power source.
I'm sure it was known since ancient times because its visible to the eye in light polluted areas.
Sure there were delays... still... just amazed at how it was achieved on one go this time.
Every Autumn I look forward to seeing Orion and esp. Rigel.
The new machine does a great job in taking super cool photographs. Wish My smartphone could be like that. 🤔🙄😒
Thank you for your explanation
Fascinating!
Amazing images! Thanks for the video 👍
Glad you enjoyed it
@@TheSecretsoftheUniverse I did, thanks. Orion has long been one of my favourite constellations 😁
I was wondering if they could take a picture of earth seen that the telescope are so far away from us. It would be nice to see a real photograph from that perspective.
Yes, please. It will be amazing to see where we are from afar.
blue marble is a real photo of earth. The one taken by the Apollo missions. There wasn't no cgi back then my friend. Filmed camera photo.
This is so incredible 😭 how can I sign up to add Portuguese captions to these videos?
Which browser are you using? Chrome has a translator function in it and it will translate the Closed Captions, the CC button, into your language.
Our sun is so powerful, it gives light to all stars around it.
But there ARE NO STARS around it!
What?
Go back to high school, bro. Learn the basics.
It's computor design ?
I would love to see the James Webb photograph Betelgeuse
Still waiting for JWST to take photos of things that we actually could have a chance of visiting someday (less than 10 light years away)
Shuddap
@@bidensucks2922 Now now, be a good little boy and go play with your action figures in your room, sonny. The grownups are having a discussion here.
@@Markus_Andrew 😂🤡🖕🏻
I wish videos like these would show more actual pictures of what the title says instead of a bunch of computer generated graphics, There was about 55 seconds total of the Webb image in this 6 1/2 minute video.
when is it going to see how far the telescope can see?
We need a continuous "live cam" video feed in a reality TV format...sort of like Big Brother.
@ 0.40
The Hubble image is purposely blurry. Why lie?
I'm waiting for images of life! Can it look millions of years closer and find signs of life, living things?
Which images are actually Webb and which are artistic renderings?
Is this really what we were all waiting for? I don't know about you but I'm waiting for exoplanet pictures. I know they won't be detailed but they'll be a few pixels and you know what? That's honestly awesome. But I'm actually kind of sad we can't see detailed pictures of exoplanets but what are you going to do? There is no known way to do that yet.
Does a video about the James Webb image that we've all been waiting for ....and only shows Hubble images.
It'd be interesting to know if inhabitants on planets, around stars, in nebulae, see there's a difference in space and it's color. From inside a nebula vs not being inside a nebula.
Actually, that would be an interesting pov
What does one of the closest nebulas to the naked eye mean???
It’s means if you point a telescope to the sky you would be able to see it
Beautiful
Law of One by Ra. has some interesting views about how the stars and planets are formed.
Butterflies in my stomach 😸😸
The big question no one is asking.
Where did the molecular mass of the Orion cluster come from?
We've always assumed that the clouds of mass come from supernova of existing stars. That would be a pretty big star to create that massive amount of molecular cloud.
Why does it have to be just one star?
Q: "Where did the molecular mass of the Orion cluster come from?"
A: Millions and billions of stars, over billions of years.
We need a book collection from Webb. Anybody reading this that works for a publisher?
Right at 4:54, pause it. Cross your eyes so the images overlap perfectly and where the clouds are shaped the same, pay attention. Please enjoy! I have a video on this on my channel🥰
bad bot
I truly wish RUclips would reduce their time requirements, so that EVERY “Webb” video didn’t need to be a history of astronomy
have you noticed that this telescope can look “back in time” but they never point it to Alpha Centauri (the nearest place that should have an earth like planet) or to the Sagittarius constellation (where the mysterious “wow signal” came)? 🤔
Maybe they're looking at Orion because of the pyramids of Giza ? Just a thought.
From what I heard certain scientists got in line so the telescope focuses only on one area for x time then moved on as requested so that area has not been mapped yet. The telescope hadn't been online that long.
I think they have taken a look at Alpha Centaury B! They are saying that the JWST may have detected artificial light on the planet orbiting it! If true, that is a monumental discovery! Best wishes to you and yours!
The origin of the WOW signal is not known with certainty. There are two fairly large patches of sky the antenna could have been pointed at when the signal was received. The JWST images a tiny spot in the sky. Just saying "the Sagittarius constellation" isn't anywhere near precise enough.
Another good photo by the JWST.
Indeed!
Before I watched: "I bet the title is just clickbait." After I watched: "Ok, cool!"
Great news! One Q. ? About the Xoplanet ..... With that size of 12 x the mass of Jupiter,. What would keep that planet from going into Nuclear fusion ? And collapsing under its own gravity?
Orion was discovered in the 1600s? Bruh this is the problem with our generation 🤦♂️
I'll bet the ancients knew about it millennia before that.
The Orion Nebula was discovered when the first creature with eyes looked at the sky. It is a naked eye object.
What's being said is just speculation. Remember he said "Many things are unknown"
@Frank Janiec
I agree with you
Some things human kind will never know the answer to
Outer space is something that's kinda scary to me
It's all over now, because they finally fit the entire Universe into a Thumbnail photo.🙃🙃
Amazing video..James Webb reveals web of universe.. (artists will be overloaded making artists impressions.🙃.)
James Nail webbed it
When the JWST starts really looking back into the early Universe (the first 100 million years) it will see so many galaxies so close together. It is going to see nothing but galaxies. The old Universe (all the mass in a small, maybe earth sized) became, for a short time, a Galaxy Creating Machine! The first thing that this machine did was create one large spiral galaxy with a black hole in the center, between both Sides (of the old Universe, it was an inside job >smile< soon to be new universe) pushing full blast against each other (We should all know because We all had to >smile again< choose sides back then and probably push with all our mental might! We all (all the Beings in this/old Universe) knew what was happening; We were all there; We are all eternal; where else would We all have been at this moment, with our Awareness & Consciousness, We had no form.) creating that first large spiral galaxy with one very large black hole in the center)! The tremendous stress blew both Sides into countless Pieces, each Piece pushing on those near it creating many, many more spiral galaxies (elliptical galaxies got created mostly when the galaxies were close together there were many collisions and that left two elliptical galaxies going on their merry way; and one larger black hole or two black holes orbiting each other going their own way) and other matter. Elliptical galaxies got created in another way where three progenitors act on each other such that the galaxy is created with all the gas being stripped out by the creation) The Progenitors (the old Universe in pieces) that created all this are Quasars now. Most Quasars pushed each other to the perimeter of our new Universe. From there they they form a basket like pattern all around the new Universe. They are responsible for our gravity and moving electromagnetic vibrations and much more. Some Quasars stalled and remained in the physical Universe. The JWST will allow Us to understand what happened back then. We all can see, as well, that We were always a part of whatever this Universe was/is involved in… “out of the One many, out of the many One”
Finaly someone who is not involving god or conspiracy theories into the subject. Respectable!
Where are the pictures of alpha Centauri or any of the other suns within 20 light years? Data on the atmospheres of their planets?
4:59 “just months in to unfolding the universe” 🤔
Looking back in time
They are all full of it.
So the JWT is worth about $10 Billion, what are the advantages of space exploration, what are the benefits of knowing these discoveries?
Appreciated for being strait to the point and showing the image not talking about webb's full history , that is getting old. after all im not here for a history lesson just want to see the image lmao
This confirms the Rope Hypothesis.
Thing is.. you need a black hole in order to pull in gravity around it and to hold the gas and matter, so that's how stars and galaxy's form . Certain stars eventually become black holes themselves.. and so the cycle continues.. soooooo how exactly did the first stars form? .. how can you have a black hole BEFORE the first star was even created? ..
you dont need a black hole to form stars. you just need dust and gas to clump together and eventually the bigger that clump gets, it'll have it's own gravity. then it'll attract more dust and gas and it'll collapse under the gravity to form a star
@1:35 It would seem you are still following the old gravimetric model of star formation that has been debunked. Our Plasma Universe has a different mechanism. Do your homework. Birkeland Currents, Z- pinch, etc...
..... And what is being seen by the JWST is just the 1st(first) level of the Universe. Allaahu Akhbar !
It appears that the large vertical gas & dust so said clouds in the Orion Nebula, are attracted to the Quasar stream from another nearby Galaxy. It appears the clouds are attracted to the Quasar Stream, then the Quasar stream runs throughout the center of centered cloud formations of many Elemental fruits. Clearing out the center of the clouds, as the clouds form around & are attracted to the outer radiance of the Quasar stream. Then the Nebula Clouds attracted to the outside of the Quasar stream & meet pressure from the Quasar higher up. Which causes the Nebula Clouds to flow away from the Quasar Stream at the top of the formations of the Nebula Clouds. Then the other Nebula Clouds around the main Nebula Clouds attracted to the Quasar, are attracted to the Nebula Clouds that are most attracted to the Quasar. This should indicate that the elements in the Nebula Clouds around the Quasar are either heaviest or lightest types of Elemental Organic Materials positive Producing cloud formations. Which indicates that the Nebula Clouds around the the main Nebula Cloud most attracted to the Quasar, are going to form different kinds of Solar Systems that are either heaviest or lightest Weight Based. It may be that the elements cloud nearest the Quasar are lighter materials that are easier to move to the center in attracted flows & motion. But could also be the heaviest as the Quasar Stream may actively push lighter materials away from the Quasar easier. Or that the elements attracted most to the Quasar Stream have a specific energy force that attracts to the lighted ionic flow of materials of the Quasar. Which may be cold flowing at that point.
This is so mind boggling. What is this all about? Is there a purpose in all this?
These "scientists" should be focusing on the fact that the Big Bang is in serious disrepute due to finding out that galaxies near the beginning of the "Big Bang" appear to be younger than some galaxies closer in.
*_I wish they'd look at Betelgeuse._*
Is that it? I want to see some 🖖🏽👽