Let's dedicate the first half of the story to mind numbing information and end the second half of the story with mindless action that contradicts the information we've learned in the first half.
Nothing better than a massive infodump followed by the story ignoring whatever info there was because the world needs to conform to show all the cool stuff MC does.
"This is Katana. She's got my back. She can cut all of you in half with one sword stroke, just like mowing the lawn. I would advise not getting killed by her. Her sword traps the souls of its victims."
Honestly, that scene would've been so much better if one of the villains picked a fight with her after hearing the first half and we were shown the second half. But unfortunately, climbing dude needed to be collar-sploded (or whatever that woman did to him).
So I didn’t even know what this was from and figured that last part was some guy or girl just playing up her abilities for a funny edge factor like “don’t mess with this guy, he can kill you with a flick of his finger (not really)” I think I like that interpretation better
I'm a big fan of Tolkien's method. Spend about a decade writing down all the exposition, then take it and lock it in a drawer. Have your protagonist be a simple everyman who doesn't know anything of the world outside their small simple town, so they need to have bits and pieces of exposition given to them. Not enough to fully exposite everything, of course, just the right amount that they can take in at a time. This keeps the world mysterious and magical, since you don't reveal everything, but coherent, since you wrote it all down beforehand. 50 years after your smash hit, have your son release all the exposition for the lore nerds to read.
@@wormius7350 The opposite, actually. It was a Hobbit sequel that grew over time, for a long time Tolkien thought Rivendell was going to be the halfway point and he only added new chapters because he felt it was necessary. Some characters, like Faramir, were a surprise to Tolkien as well.
I'm not going to get a better opportunity to point this out: David Lynch's 1984 film adaptation of scifi classic *Dune* begins with an obtuse exposition dump. The book begins with Paul Atredies' mother contemplating the ethics of genetically and socially engineering her son to be a messianic figure.
"What !? You don't know Generic Rich Straight White Man !? Generic Rich Straight White Man is simply the most successful business man in the city ! You see, in 1973-"
@@spicingdeed8931 I'm not SUPER well versed in the genre, but there is some damn good cyberpunk out there if you look. I highly recommend Battle Angel Alita it's a great cyberpunk story
@@Barwasser I honestly liked that line. Yeah it's kinda cheesy but I feel like that's the point of the Star Wars text crawls, it's to make you feel like you're jumping into a pulpy adventure serial.
Cough* (Deap elderly voice) Prolog: It all started in the summer of 2020 but the true beginning was a year before when to covid started, a few thousend people died, so the united goverments of the world decided to prevent the freedom of the people and made them prisoners in their own house. In the summer of 2020, this situation has not changed and many people were busy on the internet and such, so was our protagonist. One day at 1am, the protagonist was lying on the bed, they were bored and had no clue of what to, so they opened the 'You Tube'. A site that uses the internet to deliver videos and ads to the people. The protafonist whatched many videos until they reached an interesting channel, it was a channel ran by a cinical writer who animated simple and short video explaining how not to write. The channel's name is Terrible Writting Advice. Chapter 1: 20 years during the fourth invasion of the north, the protagonist was trapped in a dark room, remenicing the last time something like this has happened...
Ah yes. 1 DC (during covid). I remember that young, naive time where we thought the whole world would come together to stop the spread of a deadly pandemic... just as soon as we all agreed it actually existed...
Remember, it's okay to exposition dump when you're writing your first draft. That's when you yourself are learning the pace for your story and just putting down as much necessary information out of your head as possible.
I needed to see this, ty! My first draft had some rough info dumps in the middle and end of the book explaining my character's identity. I realize now how completely boring that would be to read, and have decided to sprinkle in clues and flashbacks throughout the book instead :D
The critical point is "first draft", which implies there are other, improved, drafts. At least some of those drafts should include improvements based on feedback from an editor.
"The easy ways of handling exposition are either info dumping, or not bothering to explain anything at all." Somehow, the RWBY prologue managed to do both.
@@reverie02 In the prologue the writers info dump telling you about the resources in the world instead of the fact that's it's on the brink of war (something you don't find out until season 3.) The writers actually do a lot of the things that are in this video like info dump on the characters (and the audience) in a classroom setting. It's messy.
There were some genuinely really good episodes in season 3, but the show has this habit of being good in short stints making people hope that it might get better, and season 3 is no exception. There’s a video by Hbomberguy on the show’s disappointing run, it’s really good and quite funny.
It's best to do an anti-infodump: Not telling, and also not showing. Avoid all information altogether and let the reader figure it out. Then claim all the people's theories and the multiple contradictory interpretations as your plan all along.
This is a hot take, but mind, not all hot takes are good takes. This sort of storytelling is what Dark Souls does: it's slightly lazy and more fitting of a game which can be explored manually rather than a story that goes on unstoppingly without anyone explaining to the reader on what on earth the context behind whatever's happening is supposed to be.
"Ask yourself, 'what is my reader most excited to see next?' and then make it absolutely clear that your exposition section will make no progress whatsoever toward that part of the story. This will help the reader focus on your exposition without the distraction of narrative immersion, and let them appreciate the far more important fact that you spent tens of hours crafting a new and exciting elemental magic system!"
One way I've seen it done is for a character to point out something abnormal about a fantastical element of their story. Like in a world with floating cities, the MC comes across such a city and notes that it's only floating about a thousand feet off the ground, much lower than a city of that size should be. Or, in a world with warp drives, a character complaining that it's taken a week to get halfway to the solar system over when most ships would've been there and back by now. It's basically a tactic of increasing information density without slowing down the story. Conveying how the world normally works, conveying how their current situation differs from normal, and the character's perspective.
Brilliant, I love it. If I were more witty I would point out something abnormal about your comment compared to other comments to exposit its significance but instead just take this gold star ⭐️
The only problem with this would be in Harry Potter, where every character seems to not know how their own world works and constantly ask eachother how certain things work
In some series of novels, namely "The Babysitters' Club", the same information about each of the titular girls is dumped at the beginning of each book, which can be a lot to take in all at once.
Animorphs I think did expositions really well. Every book is someone's first, so there's gotta be an info dump at the beginning every single time, but it's always done so shrewdly and with so much character that it doesn't get tiring even 50+ books in.
I think that's because the series isn't really meant to be chronological like it's not fold in a set the books are just kind of everywhere and there's a thousand of them so it's there so that no matter what book you start with you get all the same background information plus for people like my sister who can't pay attention for their life getting all the same information at the beginning of every single book make sure she might actually remember some of it I personally think it's kind of cool a little annoying but also you know it's a system you can count on you can count on the book to explain everything you've missed since the last one almost you can trust them and it's really cool
@@Dudebox64 The best part about it is when it finally gets subverted in the final two books. I still get chills whenever I re-read them just because of how significant it is.
Call me crazy, but I think Yu-Gi-Oh did a fairly good job at exposition After all, how else would I know what pot of greed did if no one explained it every 3 episodes?
"The chief engineer could explain exactly why that's bad" -- reminds me of the Mass Effect quote: Gunnery Chief: This, recruits, is a 20-kilo ferrous slug. Feel the weight! Every five seconds, the main gun of an Everest-class dreadnought accelerates one to 1.3 percent of light speed. It impacts with the force of a 38-kiloton bomb. That is three times the yield of the city buster dropped on Hiroshima back on Earth. That means Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space. Now! Serviceman Burnside! What is Newton's First Law? Serviceman Burnside: Sir! An object in motion stays in motion, sir! Gunnery Chief: No credit for partial answers, maggot! Serviceman Burnside: Sir! Unless acted upon by an outside force, sir! Gunnery Chief: Damn straight! I dare to assume you ignorant jackasses know that space is empty. Once you fire this hunk of metal, it keeps going till it hits something. That can be a ship, or the planet behind that ship. It might go off into deep space and hit somebody else in ten thousand years. If you pull the trigger on this, you are ruining someone's day, somewhere and sometime. That is why you check your damn targets! That is why you wait for the computer to give you a damn firing solution! That is why, Serviceman Chung, we do not "eyeball it!" This is a weapon of mass destruction! You are not a cowboy shooting from the hip!
Videogames as a medium have a lot of room for exposition as atmosphere. It's one of the advantages of the format that even other visual mediums (movies, TV, comics) don't get as much mileage out of. (Since a world you can suspend your disbelief in the artificial nature of is a major goal in video games.)
5:06 Imagine a conversation your characters are having in the back seat of a car, in a modern setting, that goes like- "The traffic light just turned red. *_As you know,_* that means you're supposed to stop until it turns green." "Isn't it great that Thomas Edison invented the light bulb that gets used so much in our daily lives?" To make it less clunky, try picturing the guy in the back seat sarcastically yelling at the driver, "Hey! You're supposed to STOP when the light's red!" **Insert narration describing how the light changes from red to green** "...There, NOW you can go! Jeez!" The Thomas Edison bit can come up later, if at all. *It doesn't need to be mentioned if it's not relevant to the story.*
"Gintama gets better after 300 episodes" "Boruto gets better when we reach the flash forward" "Dragon Ball Super will get better when its back" "If you don't like it, why are you watching it?" "If you didn't watch it, you can't judge it." Smurt People :]
@@M3rtyville Okay that Gintama one is just flat out wrong. Its fantastic from episode one. It just gets better. Boruto on the other hand doesn’t… or maybe I’m being bias because it should have never existed.
@@M3rtyville Anime fans are for some reason unable to grasp the idea that there are flaws in their favorite shows. Excessive fanservice? Important to the plot! Unneeded exposition? Absolutely necessary! Pointless and boring filler? It's fun to watch!
When I wrote my first book, at some point early on I felt I needed the characters to be taught how the aliens learned to travel through space. My early drafts just had the usual paragraph exposition, but I revised it and later on realized I just didn't care. So I made a character who also didn't really care explain it. I got to half ass the explanation and develop a side character. I can save the real explanation for a better time.
"Bruh, now every single person of that species has to know how every single technology they have work? Is my first thought when i see humans asking them how rocket science work?" "... Specieist" -a very tired alien who has been asked how their space travel works one too many times
This video came out right in the nick of time. Just cut out a page of exposition dedicated to a character that dies in the first chapter, and then put it right back in after watching this video. As a writer, you think you put in a lot of stuff that needs putting out, but of course, the truth is that you're just being way too critical and doubtful about yourself. You can't make mistakes. Everything you put down on the page is obviously meant to stay for good! Thanks for the amazing writing advice.
@@Gabriel87100 At some point you just need to bite the damn bullet. Put the story away somewhere and don't touch it. Then write a second one. Then once you have written the second one, come back to the first one.
@@Gabriel87100 In all seriousness, I recommend simply finishing a draft. It feels good to finish, and it's a positive achievement in the long run. I've been in the same loop as you. When you're writing, erasing, rewriting, erasing, that's usually a sign your story won't ever be made unless you just forget about committing any mistakes, and simply write the story. There's a reason there's a first draft. It's not there to stay. You'll edit it after you've finished writing it, so instead of worrying about what to edit in the now, just get creative and write down everything in your head, no matter what happens to it later down the line in the next three or so drafts.
@@Gabriel87100 Finish it then edit it. Don’t forget that you don’t need avoid everything that he says, so long as you are writing a fun and interesting story
@@Gabriel87100 Think of these videos more as tools for critical analysis then mine fields to avoid. Sometimes you need to write that information dump in the first draft for yourself. To understand your story. Then you go back and refine. Or get a trusted 2nd or 3rd party to help you find the bits that just aren’t necessary. We all grew up with tropes, we will all write a few. And something isn’t bad just because it’s a trope, it’s really a matter of wielding the right weapons for the right story.
4:22 Ah yes, explaining your powers and abilities to the ENEMY whom you are fighting to the DEATH. A classic antagonist move that will in no way backfire. Is the character in question explaining their abilities in a way that is misleading and vague to confuse their enemies? No. Is the character at least explaining their powers in a way that characterizes them. Also no. Edit: Also, when the protagonist inevitably figures out the weaknesses of the antagonist's abilities and crafts a convoluted plan to exploit it. Be sure to have them ALSO explain it in the most booooooooooooooring and overly wordy way possible. It's not like you're in the middle of a LIFE and DEATH battle.
"My attacks will poison you, but you can overcome the poison by doing this thing!" "Alright, I'm gonna do that then." "HOW DID YOU OVERPOWER MY POISON??"
The best use of this trope is in Jujutsu Kaisen, where due to how the power system works literally just telling your abilities to your opponent makes them stronger.
"nothing gets my blood pumping in the middle of a fight scene like a long-winded explanation of everyone's powers complete with charts and graphs" as an HxH fan, yes.
@@tompatterson1548 yeah, one of the characters ability involves opening a parallel future concurrently with the present, and the author needed to draw some graphs so the audience has a better chance of understanding it
Can we just appreciate how tight and interesting the exposition was at the start of Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring movie? If you have it, just watch and be impressed by how much important information you get without it overstaying its welcome. I also appreciate how they go back and fill in gaps later when needed instead of the massive info dump courtesy of Gandalf in the book.
Also, shifting the explanation of the Nazghul to Aragorn from Gandalf makes better thematic sense, as Aragorn shares the Ringwraiths' status as a "fallen king".
In the book Gandalf was imparting information to Frodo that was vital to his quest, items that weren't common knowledge in the world and that Frodo was ignorant of. It made sense in the context.
My go to example of good exposition would be Inception, even when it's just infodumping everyone stays in character and the way it actually delivers information still builds on their archs, like in the cafe dream where it actually connects dreambuilding to Ariadne's experience with art and inspiration and Cobb seems to be genuinely fascinated with the power of the mind, or later when Ariadne summons a real-life bit of Paris and gets stabbed by Mal, it highlights her inexperience and idealism while also showing how terrified Cobb is of losing himself to the dream world again.
I don't mind the "info-dumps" in the books that much, since they're always told by a character in a context that makes sense. At the end of it they're just another story, told in the same way Tolkien tells any present events. It's actually a clever way to do non-linear storytelling, and at least for me it's a refreshing contrast against a lot of modern novels which feel like they're trying too hard to be movie scripts.
Helped that it felt more like a short story than an info dump. You got to see this stuff happen instead of just have a character talk about it. It was entertaining, and you got enough background information for the main story.
I like when exposition is told through a first person perspective, where the reader learns with the character, or when the plot is told in passing, like a written report by the main character or for the main character, instead of the character or a third person spouting the information into your face.
I prefer either narration or a character explaining stuff to other characters. Narration I like when it's establishing stuff that "everybody knows," you know, stuff that the characters don't perceive to be interesting or exciting. It doesn't have to be literally known by all of the characters; as long as the character(s) who do know it don't regard it as anything more than background detailing, it counts. I feel that 3rd person narration is the best format for conveying the "this is well known and unexciting" tone. I mean, if the information is so unexciting, there is no motivation for the character that knows to share it in any way, shape, or format. And if a situation comes up where the reader can learn the information firsthand, the scene is going to be hard to understand because the character already knows something the reader does not. So I think narration is best for helping the reader to understand this sort of information without confusing them or making them ask why the character is talking about it in the first place. On the other hand, if the information is not considered ordinary or boring, then I like to have characters explain it to other characters. A character that just found out stunning news can be acting out of character, prompting the others to ask if they're ill before they manage to explain. Or a character that is normally reserved and distant is discovered to have one particular passionate interest that they nerd out over before realizing they've broken their cover and hastily retreating back into their shell, possibly while grumbling, "Forget the second half of that, it wasn't important anyway." Information that the characters consider to be worth sharing is a goldmine of tools for shaping character dynamics! Ah, I love this kind.
But would that include flashbacks and nightmares of a tragic life period in a character who can't seem to move on from her past? The line is really thin for newbies. At what point it stops being the discovery process of a character's personality and experiences, and becomes an unnecessary flashback holding the plot back?
@@Gabriel87100 Similar to what Ren said, if it's important enough to show onscreen, find a way to show it--if the entire scene isn't important, give us the important parts. For example, if the backstory that's relevant is "the character has trauma from the war" you could have someone push them for war stories only to have them change the subject, or give them scars/a prosthetic limb and just mention it's from the war & they don't want to talk about it, or say "She woke from another nightmare. She'd been back on the battlefield again--but that was a long time ago" and move on with the story. If it's something like one character's relationship to another, you could have a different character mention "how's your mom?" and the other struggle to say she's dead, or have two characters who're working together secretly make eye contact as they pass by but not say anything, or something like that. Readers aren't stupid, if the outline of the information is there they'll trust you. One of the best traumatic backstories I've read basically had the reader see all these people that had escaped from this institution and see that they all acted very traumatized--being obsessed with their own strange beliefs, going from calm to violently angry over little things, etc--and when the other characters tried talking about it, they just said they'd rather die than go back. We, the readers, don't really need a clear picture--anything we imagine is harsh enough, and if the author _did_ try to spell it out it'd risk sounding like an overreaction or else sounding too ~edgy~.
i’ve seen a couple fantasy writers handle explaining their world building to the audience by putting in important information between each chapter. it’s usually about a page or two of in-universe documents that tie in nicely with a previous chapter or explain certain parts of the fantasy world’s history. I think it’s really creative and clever, especially if the documents are presented as diary entries or pages from a fake history textbook.
@@wren_. One of the advantages of in-world documents is that they can be unreliable narrators... and that can be played with. The Commissar Ciaphas Cain books play with this, with little blurbs from in-universe documents at the beginning of every chapter... but the authors are usually characters you meet in the larger text, and consequently you sometimes can compare 'reality' with what they wrote, and sometimes you can learn something new about the character because of how what they wrote down. Mind, the Cain books have 'unreliable narrator' as one of their central hooks. So it's not surprising when the author plays with it.
Damn Bland Potato, I couldn't imagine actually using exposition advice from this channel. Let me explain As you know, this channel called "Terrible Writing Advice" published it's first video on August 30th, 2016. The creator, J.P Beaubien, who lives at 1597 Vernon Street, clearly said..........
Do not worry about info dumps: Just write an isekai! Every character in the story apart from the protagonist will be constantly explaining the lore, worldbuilding, and magic systems to the protagonist by necessity, so you will just have an entire page of someone's monologue about how the merchant's guild works or about the war against the demon lord every three or four pages.
Your video on exposition couldnt have come at a more perfect time, I finally decided to write my own book, and considering its a fantasy novel, exposition will very much be needed. Thanks for inspiring me to create my own book.
JP fails to bring up a good point about Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy's exposition- it's Counterexposition. It's not there to explain anything. It's there to break up the flow of the story so you don't notice the author just pulled a "and that was that. Moving on..." to the plot. "Turns out that mice creating the Earth as an experiment... ha, irony?... to solve the universe isn't as funny as you thought it'd be? Have a flashback within a Guidebook entry so you can get out of the plot and into another plot you can back out of so you can get into another plot so..."
Admittedly, I don't have much experience with writing exposition. However, in that limited experience, I've learned that exposition should be limited to what's necessary. Not quite literally every aspect of their subject.
I heard it once explained that exposition belongs in three categories: necessary, flavor text, and director notes. The necessary is what the reader needs to know about the story. The flavor text are details that flesh the world out, but aren’t necessary. Director’s notes are for the writer only: ie gravity exists or the specific political ins and outs.
Isn't... one of the traits of the SCiP Foundation telling a story via what would typically be understood as exposition dumbs? By adding a trait of horror via removing the humanity from a story, to make it more frightening--with part of it from it a ?subversion? of using exposition I mean... IIRC, the parts of the site written by Dr. Bright, the author (different from Dr. Bright, the character... which itself is a bit of existential horror), are largely the Tales... but the Tales always struck me as an add on "extra feature"... a sort of bells and whistles... but like, I understand I am suppose to be staunchly against Bells and Whistles... and entirely about being purely Meat and Potatoes and no fun allowed--Fundamentalist Charter Accountancy and all that
Then SCP is the extreme necessary, remember and nowadays, people ignore it but… _context and framing matters,_ and in the SCP documents context, we’re reading confidential that has several details of it inked out and edited out for either _safety reasons or it being only available for high officials_
Well… I’m actually not talking to you @@purplehaze2358, specifically talking to Katrina… though why is the author a terrible person? I don’t know much about SCP authors, all and their activities
For me exposition is one of my favorite things in writing. I love the challenge it brings to incorporate information about the world in a both engaging and natural way. I worked on the world for hours not to lecture the audience, it’s to brag to my writer friends about how much I did!
Honestly if you're going to info dump, that's really the way to do it- * Brief summary with minimal proper nouns * Awesome music to get the audience excited followed by mysterious, peaceful music to let it all sink in * Gradually display the text in a manner that the audience isn't overwhelmed but feels enough of a sense of urgency to actually read it
I’ve been a self-proclaimed writer for over a year now (though I only recently got good at it so I’m still basically a novice). How I’m gonna handle exposition is as follows: Main character spent their formative years in a dystopian land. In other words, not knowing anything about the outside world. This means they will ask questions that the reader may also have (but I’m hopefully gonna keep it limited to relevant things, not like “oh when was Rodrick Ballscratcher the Third’s outdoor lavatory built?”). Second book sees a different protagonist exploring different lands, a perfect opportunity for world building with some lore thrown in every so often. It’s gonna be multiple books long, assuming I actually finish any. (Bloody procrastination). So no need to rush through exposition or condense everything into one or two books. Plenty of the lore will tie in to the main focus, depending on what focus there currently is (not every last bit, but on occasion. Maybe “plenty” is an exaggeration). To top it all off, I have a glossary of sorts for jotting down notes and ideas. If released publicly, it would be pretty much ideal for those that want *all* the information. (The damn file got corrupted but thankfully I remember most of the stuff in it). Edit: Nearly forgot to mention that I made a historical timeline, meaning there’s room for prequels and spin-offs. That opens the door to having the exposition being spread out. In other words, the main series has the compulsory exposition while the spin-offs provide extra historical exposition.
Meanwhile, Death Note rips a hole in the space time continuum for making exposition more interesting then a resurrected Palpatine sending 1 billion Death Stars to conquer the galaxy with no explanation.
One of the most effective ways to deliver exposition is to use it to give answers to questions you're already raised in the audience's mind. They're far more likely to sit around for it if you are giving them information that they wanted to know, rather than you front-loading the information and tacitly telling them that this will be on the test. Consider how Harry Potter doesn't learn what in the world "Hogwarts" is until about the third or fourth chapter. Instead we open with a series of progressively more fantastical events before Hagrid finally shows up to tell Harry (and us) what's been happening.
I like how the beginning sounds even more like a seductive villain speech/explanation than usual. Speaking of supposed villains, my that hydra is quite polite and helpful. (Also I chuckled at the bit of code at 11:35.)
This is usually why I hate prologues. They're fine when they're done right, but so many writers just treat them as info-dumps with a heavy handed "You'll need to know this for later!" slapped on your cheek.
@@surprisedchar2458 Exactly. Or just integrate said information through the story as needed. Author: Hey, remember that one thing I told you 300 pages ago? It's finally important!
A prologue can still be done really well if it shows something important to the narrative that CANNOT be communicated earlier on. One example (of many) Is the prologue to a Game of Thrones. (minor spoilers, nothing too big.) It follows a patrol of nights watch as they encounter a group of slaughtered wildlings and then die when the bodies become ice zombies. This works for 2 reasons: 1: it accurately conveys the dark, murder-happy, tone of GoT by having all these characters die. and 2: it sets up the dangers Jon Snow faces as when he arrives at the wall, as it would be impossible to convey that other than really awkward exposition. Moral of the story: it's not bad in conception.
Didn't game of thrones have a prologue with the winter zombies? Think a RUclipsr said it was a justified prologue because the zombies wouldn't be known until late in the story by the characters but couldn't just be addressed then without coming out of left field. Not 100% on this since I've absorbed the info through RUclips reviewers and not bothered to actually watch it myself.
If you really just want to dump out information, fun facts, tidbits and quirky details of your setting, why not write a fictional travel guide? Like honestly, I've done that myself and it was pretty fun. Called it "Places, people and how to enjoy the former despite the latter" or something similarly snarky if I recall correctly. By far not my greatest literary work, but I have a soft spot for that little booklet.
Brandon Sanderson wonderfully plays with the audience expectation of exposition in one of his Mistborn stories. (MAJOR SPOILERS for that series, don't read further if you're currently reading it.) At the start of one of the sequels, a certain character has to be reminded of several events from earlier books that they were present for and really should remember. Most readers will write it off as just some clumsy dialogue exposition and move on. But in fact, it's because the character in question has been replaced by an imposter, something we only find out much later in the story.
I just wrote a terribly long scene of info dumping that was stupendously long and more boring than ever.....dialogue spanning near seven comic pages with near entire paragraphs for word balloons. Thanks to this video, I have come up with a replacement that weaves that information into a more tense scene instead, and shortens it to keep the pacing. Thank you for this video!
The best solution is just to make the "exposition dump" an interesting story in itself - LoTR does this really well, the backstory of Sauron and the One Ring is a classic example of telling instead of showing, but I didn't mind because it's literally Epic. The movie does it as a prologue, which works well because they can put Sauron on screen. From what I remember in the books, by the time Gandalf actually exposits it, there's plenty of buildup and suspense, so it actually feels satisfying to get some answers. YMMV on every use of this, but stories within a story are a classic literary technique for a reason. Honestly, if you do this well the main danger is that the myth or legend will be more interesting that the story around it...
I think a good way to handle exposition is by having it be part of a situation where you expect a lot of info to be dumped. A news broadcast, a mission briefing and watching an in universe advertisement is a good way to do this. The upside of this is that it both provides information and gives you a shortcut to set the tone almost immediately.
Having the story start in an actual school provides a convenient way to tie in exposition while having characters debate about that exposition and, as a result, reveal info about themselves. An officer's academy, for example, can send characters on plot advancing missions and provide a setting where characters can ask questions about basic aspects of the world.
I‘ve found that „discovery writing“ (TWA explained the technique in one of his videos, unfortunately, I don’t remember which one) works quite well for this: You make rough outline of the story as well as the setting etc., kind of like a zoomed out map containing only the most essential information, and then, as you‘re writing, lay out the information as you „discover“ it. The more you plan beforehand (i.e. „architect writing“), the harder it might get to distribute the information evenly but still in a way that feels natural. That is, making sure that not every chapter contains the same amount of information, since there is never a continuous stream of knowledge in real live either. It‘s a bit hard for me to explain, since I didn‘t really „learn“ to write, nor spent time „finding my voice“. I just… started, and kept doing it (after some years of rarely writing at all, except for school and uni purposes), until I was writing nearly every day if possible. I sometimes wonder if it would have been more effective to properly learn some of the techniques, though… (Sorry, if that was a bit long and rambling.)
Dude I love your videos, I've been struggling with writing lately because of depression and other stuff, but the content here always makes me wanna dabble in my stories a bit with all the good advice.
A cool thing I did earlier today with exposition is to have the smart scientist character actually make an incorrect guess, not an illogical guess, an actually believable one about the situation that is still smart, but wrong, then I had a character come in that actually had experience in the situation, allowing them to naturally do the correct answer exposition, but during all of it, the characters have a natural back and fourth about the plan, slowly figuring it out for themselves as the truth arises
3:10 my headcanon for why the non-player is now in a completely different fantasy story is because they checked out so much they didn't realise their D&D game had ended.
I remember an author who literally wrote the entire story as an info dump in the first paragraph and then the last seven paragraphs were just filler with the characters doing nothing until it abruptly stops.
Ah, but what about the start of SERENITY? An In-Universe Lecture, inside of a nightmare, inside of a flashback, inside of a holographic archive, inside of an in-dialog-info-dump. Chef's kiss.
7:08, so kind of like in Harry Potter. When Snape ambushes Harry with Chekhov’s Gun questions about potions that he knows Harry won’t be able to answer
I unironically enjoy stories that unceremoniously dump you into the setting with little to no explanation. I find the process of piecing together the world like a puzzle box engaging. I know I'm in a minority when it comes to that, though
Some older sci-fi anime are a lot like this. I could mention the Patlabor movies focusing a lot on the geopolitics and factions, mostly through very long dialogue.
I'm somewhere in between. Like, I don't want a piece of media to figuratively drive me out to the middle of nowhere and have to find my own way back, _some_ concrete structure and drip-fed details are welcome. But A) you don't need to tell me literally everything, letting me fill in the gaps myself is welcome; and B) the exposition I *am* force-fed can at least be seasoned to taste (i.e. well-written and organically integrated into the events at hand, adding to them rather than digressing from them).
@@thechroniclegamer4285 some other factors: 1. Location: make sure the town is just randomly placed in some completely random location as well, with no clear economic, political, or social strategy to it's placement. Make a town be in the direct line towards a larger city so it can grow slowly but surely via merchant trails? Nah that's stupid, let's just throw a town in some random field which no one ever goes to, ever. How do the townsfolk survive in such an isolated environment? I dunno. 2. Culture and life: Even though in the real world; many towns and cities have pretty distinct local cultures from each other, in fantasy towns are only distinct in name, because they all look, and act the same from one another, and have the same boring characters inside!
Bit speedwagon is a fun character, which helps a lot to make exposition more fun, by simply have an entertaining character do it. I mean speedwagon is not bad with it.
In crime procedurals, the leader of the protagonists, you know the one, the one with no discernable expertise in forensics or criminology, serves as the stand-in for the audience to the technical aspects explained to them by the experts on the team; delivering the exposition AAAAAAND explaining the purpose of the "leader" trope.
I can understand 'not enough exposition' being a problem, but what's worse than that is TOO MUCH. I can trust a writer to try to give me exposition in small bits until they can be peaced together to something coherent later. That CAN sometimes be annoying, but not as eye-rolling as EVERYTHING being force fed to you all at once and NOTHING in the story making sense unless you have all the back story you weren't even there to see carved into your brain.
It was exactly the problem with the Star Wars Sequal Trilogy. The Original Trilogy struck a balance between worldbuilding and character-development, the Prequal Trilogy focused a little too much on worldbuilding (which I personally enjoyed, nevertheless), but the Sequal Trilogy DIDN'T have any kind of worldbuilding at all, let alone decent character-development.
Too much is a common complaint, but the process you're describing is actually better than nothing being explained at all, which is usually too little exposition.
@@pendragon0905 Yeah, this is all an excellent observation of what happened with Star Wars. All of the background information for the sequel trilogy had to be found by using secondary sources (novelization, visual dictionary, etc). The PT had a bit too much, but at least we knew something about the world and whatnot. When VII came out, people thought the Republic planet blown up was Coruscant (though I'm pretty sure the system name was dropped. The incredibly stupid way of them somehow seeing the destruction from across the galaxy didn't help, though. Almost as if new reports didn't exist in the Star Wars galaxy. Plus, acting as if the entire Republic was blown up, even though it was just its capital). It was almost as if they were afraid of saying anything.
I think a good lesson I got was from the first review on my first book. They liked the characters and plot, but felt the magic system wasn't explained. I wanted to go the show don't tell route to have the action be a way to demonstrate how the magic worked. But feel the reviewer was right that my approach left more questions unanswered for how everything worked. Not to mention that Terrible Writing just underlined that I was listing words relating to my magic system without giving an explanation. This kind of got me back to the drawing board so I could find a way to fix the problem without an exposition dump. A lot of people I queried about the dilemma suggested I include a character unfamiliar with the magic system of the world, but I felt that approach was boring and overdone. Then it dawned on me to have a character that was self-taught in magic, that way the protagonist could explain how magic works through what they were doing right and wrong. I personally think it's some of the stronger moments in book 2.
I think its a good idea you came up with. Its hard to find the right balance sometimes, and balance is needed. Sometimes things need to be explained. If magic isn't properly explained AND is used and controlled by the main character(s) it could in worst case feel like there is no real stake because they could just fix everything with magic probably. But in case they aren't as much in control of it, then keeping it much more mysterious and unpredictable may work
I remember in Neal Stephenson's book Cryptonomicon, there is this part where several pages are devoted to describing how the main character eats Cap'n Crunch, and the weird thing is it's actually good. While normally you would want to limit the information to whatever is relevant to the plot, it would seem what really matters is that the reader enjoys it.
It’s a good day when TWA uploads a video, fill with golden advice that will tell me what I already know and stroke my ever growing ego… I’m kidding of course. Thanks for the new video.
I think the worst one I ever read was in Hunchback of Notre Dame, which had an entire overly long chapter describing the layout of Paris streets, block by block, building by building, as viewed from the rooftop of Notre Dame. Not even pointing out this was from Quasimodo's point of view, just a dry text version of a map.
I think that exposition dumping can work if front loaded sometimes. I mean using anime as an example, to explain the world of my hero academia at the beginning of the series help set the stage. But doesn't disclose every single thing so there's still a mystery and expectation for further growth. I will admit it is annoying when any anime stops in the middle of a fight scene to explain things, such as dragon Ball, or any anime where the main character has to have a flashback to get a power boost, my hero academia also does this. Or even something as fantastic as fireforce, it does kind of ruin the pacing when it is introduced during an intense scene as opposed to outside of it
A book can do this very well because you can shove all the exposition into the main POV character's own thoughts and it generally won't interrupt your experience. A fish out of water or inexperienced young teen can also serve very well as an exposition device because as a newcomer, he would need that fictional world explained to him. it gets bad when its exposition dumped in and told to characters who should probably already know all of that stuff. this happens sometimes in Harry Potter and Thor. you also should not dedicate entire long speeches to exposition, but rather thread it through slowly. we should learn things about this world at the same time our main hero does. give us bits and pieces over time, then in the climax, it all comes together and we get the full picture. like a murder mystery. you get hints throughout the movie, but at the end you still want your big villain's motive rant.
I unironically like info dumps. I specifically love watching lore videos on sifi and fantasy series that i'm interested in but aren't fully sure I want to actually invest in specifically because there convenient info dumps. It's the biggest hurtle I need to overcome in my own writing, avoiding the info dumps I love so much.
@@takebacktheholyland9306 I think it's because 40K has great stories, they just aren't great at telling those stories. Like the war of the beast, the cluster f^ckes that where the siege of varax and the fall of kadia, the entirety of the ultra marines ... even though I hate the ultra marines because of mat ward they've made a descent comeback but I still hate them and think their a perfect example of all of my gripes about 40K.
Am just astounded that this man made sponsorships not only watchable,,, but enjoyable??? WITH PLOT??? I knowww this isn't a new thing but the writing seems to improve and I'm just here to appreciate it.
LEGIT QUESTION: Why stop here? Even if we ignore 'Hello Future Me' being famous for being another Version of JP, theres at least that 1 video that is the perfect Spiritual-Sibling to this one here: Hbomberguys Video about RWBY. It mentions many of the same Problems but explains them with different Jokes and other Humor and thats not even all to say. Natural Exposition is a whole Segment in said video. And you know who else criticized with Humor? Jay Exci and Krimson Rogue.
I remember when Star Ocean 3 came with a dictionary in the menu that was full of information designed only to fill you in on aspects of the world that were not important to understand the plot - in other words, explaining offhand references to previous games, explaining real life astronomical terms, filling in events between games for those who were curious, and giving amusing scientific explanations for why dragons slept on piles of treasure. Final Fantasy XIII looked at this and failed to understand any of the above reasons to have a dictionary.
"As you know" is such a weird convention. You're basically lampshading how the characters have no reason to be mentioning that fact except to inform the audience, as if that somehow makes it better.
I think one way you could solve it is by having the protagonist explain whatever the "as you know" part is. That way it would demonstrate their keen knowledge and intelligence about X subject
@@Green-3c34y65vrbu What I've done, and my readers appreciated, was sprinkling the aspects when they became plot relevant. It helps a bit that the characters haven't figured out all aspects of my system, and a plot thread is about them figuring out how to reverse engineer a spell. I've sprinkled some worldbuilding, too. How the calendar works in a chapter, how the hours on a clock in another, and so on.
As much as I love One Piece, the biggest thing I hate about the anime is how frequently it uses flashbacks. I'll be enjoying a fantastic final battle of an arc, then I get clubbed in the face by unnecessary flashbacks for 10 episodes of the 14 episode battle. SOOO often, the flashbacks will be about events which literally just occurred in the previous episode, and I can even remember 3 occasions when there have been flashbacks to an event that occurred in the very same episode. To top it off, often there will be stretches of an arc where they play the SAME flashback more than 10 times, as if the entire audience has the memory of Dory from finding Nemo. I love One Piece, but I hate the overuse of flashbacks. Flashbacks are useful in story telling, and can help build dramatic tension, but when overused they are tedious. It's like when your parent is reminding you of something you already know for the umpteenth time. I always skip forward several minutes of an episode just to skip these. If we're being frank, only about 30% of One Piece flashbacks strike me as necessary or useful in the plot, such as when they call back to events from at least one arc before, or to a specific character's past that we wouldn't otherwise see. If one were to remove, say, 60-70% of flashbacks from the series based on repetetiveness, thus scrunching episode and arc runtimes, I estimate the 1,030 episodes would compress down to about 930.
The one series i know that made deliberatly dry exposition awesome was log horizon as learning was kinda the main characters whole stick. He is a strategist, someone who is weak and who found his only real strength is to support others. Even the "as you know" trope was turned on its head as one character thought shiroe knew the basics alreadywhile the guy actually was absolutely clueless and had to actually get the other to monologue. The presentation, atmosphere and music helped
The sponsor segment at the end is by far one of my favorite parts in these videos! It’s wild! It literally leaves to wanting to watch the next sponsorship
I think my favorite use of exposition dumps is Nern from LISA, who is introduced as a storyteller like he's going to give you a lore dump about the worldbuilding. But instead all he does is go off about his personal life and the one time he gets close to actually talking about exposition, he's like "oh that's boring" and changes the topic.
As an anime fan, I've seen the action-pausing info dump too many times. Want to know who's good at visual exposition? Robert Zemeckis. Particularly with Back to the Future and Who Framed Roger Rabbit.
Rising of the Shield Hero is the most recent anime (that I watched) where this happens. It may be a battle between powerful characters or some giant monster trying to eat everyone, but the infodump through DIALOGUE completely haults the enemies, it's amazing
I think part of that comes from the awkwardness of adapting a manga into an anime. You never really appreciate how a line said mid-attack should take ten seconds until it actually does.
Unironically I actually REALLY LIKE, even LOVE infodumps. I mean lore, and worldbuilding is always the most interesting part to me, so the infodumbs are interesting... kinda by it's very nature really(and that's not an easy task to make them not be). It's what I watch or read things for. The character arc and all the other stuff like that? Not nearly that interesting and they pretty much become interesting BECAUSE of their relevance to the universe - so to the lore and worldbuilding. Actually for a few years already I keep myself more to fandom-based literature (aka fanfictions) and even though they are more likely to have more exposition... I still more often than not find the exposition to be too small, too little or in other ways just lacking. Sprinkling exposition little by little throughout the story not only won't always make sense (as not always there is place for it in given scene) but also hardly ever would be satisfying, because that way it usually won't be much of it. It is also kind the reason why I like multiverses (aka crossovers) as they give so many opportunity to explore the lore and worldbuilding. Or a characters which just enter the wide big world not knowing much about it yet and thus the reader can learn about world with them. And teasing little details... for most of the time is more annoying than fun(and it never would actually tell more than "10 page essay on the subject". Unless the essay is EXTREMELY bad). Though I'm myself kinda guilty of that... and as much as I agree exposition should drive narrative stakes and tension (which I of course try to do), I can't exaclty agree about the immersion part. I mean exposition is main thing that make immersion even possible, it's key factor for that. That how it's delivered (and how well it is made to be part of the story) does matter of course, but it has to be really bad (on the level that I think is VERY HARD to achieve not on purpose) to really harm immersion instead of helping it.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Let's dedicate the first half of the story to mind numbing information and end the second half of the story with mindless action that contradicts the information we've learned in the first half.
So...Batman V Superman?
The modern Disney school of writing
Genius
Like Mahouka or any harem light novel
Nothing better than a massive infodump followed by the story ignoring whatever info there was because the world needs to conform to show all the cool stuff MC does.
"This is Katana. She's got my back. She can cut all of you in half with one sword stroke, just like mowing the lawn. I would advise not getting killed by her. Her sword traps the souls of its victims."
Yeeeah and that wasn't even the WORST example of exposition in the original Suicide Squad film.
Honestly, that scene would've been so much better if one of the villains picked a fight with her after hearing the first half and we were shown the second half.
But unfortunately, climbing dude needed to be collar-sploded (or whatever that woman did to him).
So I didn’t even know what this was from and figured that last part was some guy or girl just playing up her abilities for a funny edge factor like “don’t mess with this guy, he can kill you with a flick of his finger (not really)”
I think I like that interpretation better
👏
Im an idea!
@@brianna6377 his power is that he can climb anything. I still haven't recovered from hearing that
I'm a big fan of Tolkien's method. Spend about a decade writing down all the exposition, then take it and lock it in a drawer. Have your protagonist be a simple everyman who doesn't know anything of the world outside their small simple town, so they need to have bits and pieces of exposition given to them. Not enough to fully exposite everything, of course, just the right amount that they can take in at a time. This keeps the world mysterious and magical, since you don't reveal everything, but coherent, since you wrote it all down beforehand. 50 years after your smash hit, have your son release all the exposition for the lore nerds to read.
Lore nerd here. Yes please
@@chimp4225
More please
LOTR succeeded because it was a good story first. Lore needs a good story to back it up or it's worthless.
When Tolkien was writing the Lord of the Rings, his goal was to just write the longest book he possibly could.
@@wormius7350 The opposite, actually. It was a Hobbit sequel that grew over time, for a long time Tolkien thought Rivendell was going to be the halfway point and he only added new chapters because he felt it was necessary. Some characters, like Faramir, were a surprise to Tolkien as well.
I'm not going to get a better opportunity to point this out: David Lynch's 1984 film adaptation of scifi classic *Dune* begins with an obtuse exposition dump.
The book begins with Paul Atredies' mother contemplating the ethics of genetically and socially engineering her son to be a messianic figure.
Perfect.
The latter half of the 1984 Dune movie was just torture
Apparently some theaters just handed out a pamphlet with the names of planets, a few concepts, and a pronunciation guide
*cough* "David Webber Honorverse *cough*
Not many space adventure stories start in Sunday School and discuss why having a computer is a Mortal Sin. Gotta give ol' Herb that one...
"I'm excused for bad writing, my genre says so!"
Ah, romance writers
Lmao 😭
"What !? You don't know Generic Rich Straight White Man !? Generic Rich Straight White Man is simply the most successful business man in the city ! You see, in 1973-"
@@APootisBirb Daniel Steele is frothing at the mouth rn
*cough* cyberpunk *cough*
@@spicingdeed8931 I'm not SUPER well versed in the genre, but there is some damn good cyberpunk out there if you look.
I highly recommend Battle Angel Alita it's a great cyberpunk story
Nothing can beat the subtlety of Star Wars' title crawl info dump
Star Wars RoS: "The dead speak!"
Me: "oh shit. They still haven't found a decent writer..."
“Somehow, Palpatine has returned!”
Me: ??????
@@ineednochannelyoutube2651 You could see Oscar Isaac dying inside.
You deserved better, Oscar. We all did.
@@Barwasser I honestly liked that line. Yeah it's kinda cheesy but I feel like that's the point of the Star Wars text crawls, it's to make you feel like you're jumping into a pulpy adventure serial.
@@Barwasser I liked Oscar in MoonKnight
Man I feel so nostalgic thinking about the first time I watched a Terrible Writing Advice video.
You see, it all started in the Summer of 2020....
I was there, Gandalf. I was there 3,000 years ago.
It sure as hell felt like it
I know that this is a joke, but this was actually the time when I first found TWA myself (my first video was the Killing Characters)
Cough*
(Deap elderly voice)
Prolog:
It all started in the summer of 2020 but the true beginning was a year before when to covid started, a few thousend people died, so the united goverments of the world decided to prevent the freedom of the people and made them prisoners in their own house.
In the summer of 2020, this situation has not changed and many people were busy on the internet and such, so was our protagonist.
One day at 1am, the protagonist was lying on the bed, they were bored and had no clue of what to, so they opened the 'You Tube'.
A site that uses the internet to deliver videos and ads to the people.
The protafonist whatched many videos until they reached an interesting channel, it was a channel ran by a cinical writer who animated simple and short video explaining how not to write.
The channel's name is Terrible Writting Advice.
Chapter 1:
20 years during the fourth invasion of the north, the protagonist was trapped in a dark room, remenicing the last time something like this has happened...
Ah yes. 1 DC (during covid). I remember that young, naive time where we thought the whole world would come together to stop the spread of a deadly pandemic... just as soon as we all agreed it actually existed...
I wonder if Hollywood writers watch JP's videos and don't realize that it's satire
Nah, if they actually did he'd have been permabanned from YT a long time ago. So let's make sure they never do, okay?
I'd love to see you do Terrible Writing Advice: Unreliable Narrator
But then how can we trust what he says? Wait a minute, we hardly trust anything he says normally anyway. Could be difficult to do...
I'm pretty sure EVERY TWA episode already has that covered
@@jennyevef My thoughts exactly 😂
Warhammer 40k moment
The ultimate TWA video. A capstone of his career. We shall never see it.
Remember, it's okay to exposition dump when you're writing your first draft. That's when you yourself are learning the pace for your story and just putting down as much necessary information out of your head as possible.
Yeah, anything goes in the first draft, just gotta remember to clean up the messes... XD
I needed to see this, ty! My first draft had some rough info dumps in the middle and end of the book explaining my character's identity. I realize now how completely boring that would be to read, and have decided to sprinkle in clues and flashbacks throughout the book instead :D
The critical point is "first draft", which implies there are other, improved, drafts. At least some of those drafts should include improvements based on feedback from an editor.
Got it, write a first draft and just release that
@@dinoblacklane1640 Erin Hunter, is that you?
TWA's videos are rare to see, but once they pop up in your notifications you know they're going to be good
Heck yeah
There a surprise to be sure, but a welcome one
"The easy ways of handling exposition are either info dumping, or not bothering to explain anything at all."
Somehow, the RWBY prologue managed to do both.
@@reverie02
In the prologue the writers info dump telling you about the resources in the world instead of the fact that's it's on the brink of war (something you don't find out until season 3.)
The writers actually do a lot of the things that are in this video like info dump on the characters (and the audience) in a classroom setting. It's messy.
@@reverie02
Yep.
@@reverie02 probably not. There's no payoff to anything that's set up.
Which is a shame because the trailers for the show were so dang good.
There were some genuinely really good episodes in season 3, but the show has this habit of being good in short stints making people hope that it might get better, and season 3 is no exception.
There’s a video by Hbomberguy on the show’s disappointing run, it’s really good and quite funny.
Thanks for reminding me to watch "So this is basically RWBY" again.
It's best to do an anti-infodump: Not telling, and also not showing.
Avoid all information altogether and let the reader figure it out. Then claim all the people's theories and the multiple contradictory interpretations as your plan all along.
So like, FNAF, Elden Ring, and all these other games that basically treat their lore as a community-wide ARG?
@@JoshTigerheart So, like Miraculous Ladybug does?
Ah, the JJ Abrams approach.
@@azurai3934 The mystery box that has nothing in it, you mean?
This is a hot take, but mind, not all hot takes are good takes. This sort of storytelling is what Dark Souls does: it's slightly lazy and more fitting of a game which can be explored manually rather than a story that goes on unstoppingly without anyone explaining to the reader on what on earth the context behind whatever's happening is supposed to be.
"Ask yourself, 'what is my reader most excited to see next?' and then make it absolutely clear that your exposition section will make no progress whatsoever toward that part of the story. This will help the reader focus on your exposition without the distraction of narrative immersion, and let them appreciate the far more important fact that you spent tens of hours crafting a new and exciting elemental magic system!"
One way I've seen it done is for a character to point out something abnormal about a fantastical element of their story. Like in a world with floating cities, the MC comes across such a city and notes that it's only floating about a thousand feet off the ground, much lower than a city of that size should be. Or, in a world with warp drives, a character complaining that it's taken a week to get halfway to the solar system over when most ships would've been there and back by now. It's basically a tactic of increasing information density without slowing down the story. Conveying how the world normally works, conveying how their current situation differs from normal, and the character's perspective.
Brilliant, I love it. If I were more witty I would point out something abnormal about your comment compared to other comments to exposit its significance but instead just take this gold star ⭐️
The only problem with this would be in Harry Potter, where every character seems to not know how their own world works and constantly ask eachother how certain things work
@@Toxic_G1 well that's because JK Rowling is just not a good writer
In some series of novels, namely "The Babysitters' Club", the same information about each of the titular girls is dumped at the beginning of each book, which can be a lot to take in all at once.
Animorphs I think did expositions really well. Every book is someone's first, so there's gotta be an info dump at the beginning every single time, but it's always done so shrewdly and with so much character that it doesn't get tiring even 50+ books in.
I think that's because the series isn't really meant to be chronological like it's not fold in a set the books are just kind of everywhere and there's a thousand of them so it's there so that no matter what book you start with you get all the same background information plus for people like my sister who can't pay attention for their life getting all the same information at the beginning of every single book make sure she might actually remember some of it I personally think it's kind of cool a little annoying but also you know it's a system you can count on you can count on the book to explain everything you've missed since the last one almost you can trust them and it's really cool
Not to mention really irritating for fans of the series - yes, I _know_ who this character is, just let me get to the book.
@@Dudebox64 the clever part is that they do it differently each time. It’s not just the same wall of text, each character puts their own spin on it.
@@Dudebox64 The best part about it is when it finally gets subverted in the final two books. I still get chills whenever I re-read them just because of how significant it is.
Call me crazy, but I think Yu-Gi-Oh did a fairly good job at exposition
After all, how else would I know what pot of greed did if no one explained it every 3 episodes?
What's Pot of Greed? I've never heard of that card
What does it do?
@@adamnagar7386 I wish I knew mate.
@@VainerCactus0 It gets you automatically banned from a tournament if you use it in your deck
Somebody refresh my memory, what does it do?
"This is Katana. She's got my back. I would advise not getting killed by her. Her sword traps the souls of its victims."
"Somehow, Palpatine survived."
I love how this was on everyone else's minds during this whole thing.
@@bloodysimile4893 *returned
"The chief engineer could explain exactly why that's bad" -- reminds me of the Mass Effect quote:
Gunnery Chief: This, recruits, is a 20-kilo ferrous slug. Feel the weight! Every five seconds, the main gun of an Everest-class dreadnought accelerates one to 1.3 percent of light speed. It impacts with the force of a 38-kiloton bomb. That is three times the yield of the city buster dropped on Hiroshima back on Earth. That means Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space. Now! Serviceman Burnside! What is Newton's First Law?
Serviceman Burnside: Sir! An object in motion stays in motion, sir!
Gunnery Chief: No credit for partial answers, maggot!
Serviceman Burnside: Sir! Unless acted upon by an outside force, sir!
Gunnery Chief: Damn straight! I dare to assume you ignorant jackasses know that space is empty. Once you fire this hunk of metal, it keeps going till it hits something. That can be a ship, or the planet behind that ship. It might go off into deep space and hit somebody else in ten thousand years. If you pull the trigger on this, you are ruining someone's day, somewhere and sometime. That is why you check your damn targets! That is why you wait for the computer to give you a damn firing solution! That is why, Serviceman Chung, we do not "eyeball it!" This is a weapon of mass destruction! You are not a cowboy shooting from the hip!
I love this. This is great exposition.
Imagine being killed by a bullet from 10.000 years ago
@@valletas
With an impact energy of a nuclear bomb, i wouldn't even have time to be mad, i would just be impressed
Me2 the 1st time you go to the citadel.
Videogames as a medium have a lot of room for exposition as atmosphere. It's one of the advantages of the format that even other visual mediums (movies, TV, comics) don't get as much mileage out of. (Since a world you can suspend your disbelief in the artificial nature of is a major goal in video games.)
5:06 Imagine a conversation your characters are having in the back seat of a car, in a modern setting, that goes like-
"The traffic light just turned red. *_As you know,_* that means you're supposed to stop until it turns green."
"Isn't it great that Thomas Edison invented the light bulb that gets used so much in our daily lives?"
To make it less clunky, try picturing the guy in the back seat sarcastically yelling at the driver, "Hey! You're supposed to STOP when the light's red!"
**Insert narration describing how the light changes from red to green**
"...There, NOW you can go! Jeez!"
The Thomas Edison bit can come up later, if at all. *It doesn't need to be mentioned if it's not relevant to the story.*
And then they get into an argument about whether or not Edison stole the light bulb from Tesla.
"The TWA expanded universe sucks"
"No, just wait until the Greed arc, that's when the story actually kicks off and it gets _really_ good"
It was already pretty funny, but greed made it even better somehow.
The PRIDE arc is the best. then it when down hill from there.
"Gintama gets better after 300 episodes"
"Boruto gets better when we reach the flash forward"
"Dragon Ball Super will get better when its back"
"If you don't like it, why are you watching it?"
"If you didn't watch it, you can't judge it."
Smurt People :]
@@M3rtyville Okay that Gintama one is just flat out wrong. Its fantastic from episode one. It just gets better.
Boruto on the other hand doesn’t… or maybe I’m being bias because it should have never existed.
@@M3rtyville Anime fans are for some reason unable to grasp the idea that there are flaws in their favorite shows. Excessive fanservice? Important to the plot! Unneeded exposition? Absolutely necessary! Pointless and boring filler? It's fun to watch!
When I wrote my first book, at some point early on I felt I needed the characters to be taught how the aliens learned to travel through space. My early drafts just had the usual paragraph exposition, but I revised it and later on realized I just didn't care. So I made a character who also didn't really care explain it. I got to half ass the explanation and develop a side character. I can save the real explanation for a better time.
"Golly gee, how did the aliens learn to travel through space?"
"Magic. Anyway--"
'Your puny human brain would not comprehend it.'
@@WhiteFangofWar I read that in Brain's voice.
"Bruh, now every single person of that species has to know how every single technology they have work? Is my first thought when i see humans asking them how rocket science work?"
"... Specieist"
-a very tired alien who has been asked how their space travel works one too many times
This video came out right in the nick of time. Just cut out a page of exposition dedicated to a character that dies in the first chapter, and then put it right back in after watching this video. As a writer, you think you put in a lot of stuff that needs putting out, but of course, the truth is that you're just being way too critical and doubtful about yourself. You can't make mistakes. Everything you put down on the page is obviously meant to stay for good! Thanks for the amazing writing advice.
I've been writing, erasing and rewriting the same novel for years now out of fear of always committing the same mistakes in TWA.
@@Gabriel87100 At some point you just need to bite the damn bullet. Put the story away somewhere and don't touch it. Then write a second one. Then once you have written the second one, come back to the first one.
@@Gabriel87100 In all seriousness, I recommend simply finishing a draft. It feels good to finish, and it's a positive achievement in the long run.
I've been in the same loop as you. When you're writing, erasing, rewriting, erasing, that's usually a sign your story won't ever be made unless you just forget about committing any mistakes, and simply write the story.
There's a reason there's a first draft. It's not there to stay. You'll edit it after you've finished writing it, so instead of worrying about what to edit in the now, just get creative and write down everything in your head, no matter what happens to it later down the line in the next three or so drafts.
@@Gabriel87100 Finish it then edit it. Don’t forget that you don’t need avoid everything that he says, so long as you are writing a fun and interesting story
@@Gabriel87100 Think of these videos more as tools for critical analysis then mine fields to avoid. Sometimes you need to write that information dump in the first draft for yourself. To understand your story. Then you go back and refine. Or get a trusted 2nd or 3rd party to help you find the bits that just aren’t necessary. We all grew up with tropes, we will all write a few. And something isn’t bad just because it’s a trope, it’s really a matter of wielding the right weapons for the right story.
4:22 Ah yes, explaining your powers and abilities to the ENEMY whom you are fighting to the DEATH. A classic antagonist move that will in no way backfire. Is the character in question explaining their abilities in a way that is misleading and vague to confuse their enemies? No. Is the character at least explaining their powers in a way that characterizes them. Also no.
Edit: Also, when the protagonist inevitably figures out the weaknesses of the antagonist's abilities and crafts a convoluted plan to exploit it. Be sure to have them ALSO explain it in the most booooooooooooooring and overly wordy way possible. It's not like you're in the middle of a LIFE and DEATH battle.
@@Green-3c34y65vrbu Jojo Part 1: Phantom Blood
"My attacks will poison you, but you can overcome the poison by doing this thing!"
"Alright, I'm gonna do that then."
"HOW DID YOU OVERPOWER MY POISON??"
**Genthru has entered the chat**
@@lordanubis1458 The worst part is that he specifically made that touching rule for no real reason
The best use of this trope is in Jujutsu Kaisen, where due to how the power system works literally just telling your abilities to your opponent makes them stronger.
"nothing gets my blood pumping in the middle of a fight scene like a long-winded explanation of everyone's powers complete with charts and graphs"
as an HxH fan, yes.
Tserriednich…
Fun fact: bungee gum possesses both the properties of rubber and gum.
Are there actual graphs?
@@tompatterson1548 yeah, one of the characters ability involves opening a parallel future concurrently with the present, and the author needed to draw some graphs so the audience has a better chance of understanding it
@@you-got-reported-fam3445 loool
You know what the Sponsorship section needs? An exposition dump to bring the audience up to speed on the TWA universe so far.
I literally binge watched through the sponsorship wars episodes to get up to date xD
Can we just appreciate how tight and interesting the exposition was at the start of Lord of the Rings: the Fellowship of the Ring movie? If you have it, just watch and be impressed by how much important information you get without it overstaying its welcome. I also appreciate how they go back and fill in gaps later when needed instead of the massive info dump courtesy of Gandalf in the book.
Also, shifting the explanation of the Nazghul to Aragorn from Gandalf makes better thematic sense, as Aragorn shares the Ringwraiths' status as a "fallen king".
In the book Gandalf was imparting information to Frodo that was vital to his quest, items that weren't common knowledge in the world and that Frodo was ignorant of. It made sense in the context.
My go to example of good exposition would be Inception, even when it's just infodumping everyone stays in character and the way it actually delivers information still builds on their archs, like in the cafe dream where it actually connects dreambuilding to Ariadne's experience with art and inspiration and Cobb seems to be genuinely fascinated with the power of the mind, or later when Ariadne summons a real-life bit of Paris and gets stabbed by Mal, it highlights her inexperience and idealism while also showing how terrified Cobb is of losing himself to the dream world again.
I don't mind the "info-dumps" in the books that much, since they're always told by a character in a context that makes sense. At the end of it they're just another story, told in the same way Tolkien tells any present events. It's actually a clever way to do non-linear storytelling, and at least for me it's a refreshing contrast against a lot of modern novels which feel like they're trying too hard to be movie scripts.
Helped that it felt more like a short story than an info dump. You got to see this stuff happen instead of just have a character talk about it. It was entertaining, and you got enough background information for the main story.
Me hearing greeds monolog: OH no he's complex and eloquent! He's nothing like the TWA universe at all!
I like when exposition is told through a first person perspective, where the reader learns with the character, or when the plot is told in passing, like a written report by the main character or for the main character, instead of the character or a third person spouting the information into your face.
I prefer either narration or a character explaining stuff to other characters. Narration I like when it's establishing stuff that "everybody knows," you know, stuff that the characters don't perceive to be interesting or exciting. It doesn't have to be literally known by all of the characters; as long as the character(s) who do know it don't regard it as anything more than background detailing, it counts. I feel that 3rd person narration is the best format for conveying the "this is well known and unexciting" tone. I mean, if the information is so unexciting, there is no motivation for the character that knows to share it in any way, shape, or format. And if a situation comes up where the reader can learn the information firsthand, the scene is going to be hard to understand because the character already knows something the reader does not. So I think narration is best for helping the reader to understand this sort of information without confusing them or making them ask why the character is talking about it in the first place.
On the other hand, if the information is not considered ordinary or boring, then I like to have characters explain it to other characters. A character that just found out stunning news can be acting out of character, prompting the others to ask if they're ill before they manage to explain. Or a character that is normally reserved and distant is discovered to have one particular passionate interest that they nerd out over before realizing they've broken their cover and hastily retreating back into their shell, possibly while grumbling, "Forget the second half of that, it wasn't important anyway." Information that the characters consider to be worth sharing is a goldmine of tools for shaping character dynamics! Ah, I love this kind.
Another Tip: If there's a Thing you just really are excited to explain in some way, you can *add* a plot reason to do so.
But would that include flashbacks and nightmares of a tragic life period in a character who can't seem to move on from her past? The line is really thin for newbies.
At what point it stops being the discovery process of a character's personality and experiences, and becomes an unnecessary flashback holding the plot back?
@@Gabriel87100 If the tragic life period is so interesting, then it's best to write a chapter about it instead of making it a flashback.
@@Gabriel87100 Similar to what Ren said, if it's important enough to show onscreen, find a way to show it--if the entire scene isn't important, give us the important parts. For example, if the backstory that's relevant is "the character has trauma from the war" you could have someone push them for war stories only to have them change the subject, or give them scars/a prosthetic limb and just mention it's from the war & they don't want to talk about it, or say "She woke from another nightmare. She'd been back on the battlefield again--but that was a long time ago" and move on with the story. If it's something like one character's relationship to another, you could have a different character mention "how's your mom?" and the other struggle to say she's dead, or have two characters who're working together secretly make eye contact as they pass by but not say anything, or something like that. Readers aren't stupid, if the outline of the information is there they'll trust you.
One of the best traumatic backstories I've read basically had the reader see all these people that had escaped from this institution and see that they all acted very traumatized--being obsessed with their own strange beliefs, going from calm to violently angry over little things, etc--and when the other characters tried talking about it, they just said they'd rather die than go back. We, the readers, don't really need a clear picture--anything we imagine is harsh enough, and if the author _did_ try to spell it out it'd risk sounding like an overreaction or else sounding too ~edgy~.
i’ve seen a couple fantasy writers handle explaining their world building to the audience by putting in important information between each chapter. it’s usually about a page or two of in-universe documents that tie in nicely with a previous chapter or explain certain parts of the fantasy world’s history. I think it’s really creative and clever, especially if the documents are presented as diary entries or pages from a fake history textbook.
@@wren_. One of the advantages of in-world documents is that they can be unreliable narrators... and that can be played with. The Commissar Ciaphas Cain books play with this, with little blurbs from in-universe documents at the beginning of every chapter... but the authors are usually characters you meet in the larger text, and consequently you sometimes can compare 'reality' with what they wrote, and sometimes you can learn something new about the character because of how what they wrote down.
Mind, the Cain books have 'unreliable narrator' as one of their central hooks. So it's not surprising when the author plays with it.
I unironically love using your writing advice. I really needed this, thanks!
Damn Bland Potato, I couldn't imagine actually using exposition advice from this channel. Let me explain
As you know, this channel called "Terrible Writing Advice" published it's first video on August 30th, 2016. The creator, J.P Beaubien, who lives at 1597 Vernon Street, clearly said..........
Do not worry about info dumps: Just write an isekai! Every character in the story apart from the protagonist will be constantly explaining the lore, worldbuilding, and magic systems to the protagonist by necessity, so you will just have an entire page of someone's monologue about how the merchant's guild works or about the war against the demon lord every three or four pages.
Ah yes. My monthly dose of sarcasm is back!
It appears to have changed to every 2 months. Hope he's doing something productive, like working on his second book, in his spare time.Good luck JP!
He really needs a British accent.
Your video on exposition couldnt have come at a more perfect time, I finally decided to write my own book, and considering its a fantasy novel, exposition will very much be needed. Thanks for inspiring me to create my own book.
I hope you become succesful!
Best of luck, fellow!
I feel like JP's character would be capable of singing the exposition song very well.
Erm… could you tell me more? (I‘ve never heard of this song)
@@ericpraline ruclips.net/video/5ffLIJrYEJ8/видео.html
This is the song about exposition dumping
@@malicekerendu3574 thanks
Hey, that's me, but you already know...
Sorry, but several international treaties prohibit him from singing.
JP fails to bring up a good point about Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy's exposition- it's Counterexposition. It's not there to explain anything.
It's there to break up the flow of the story so you don't notice the author just pulled a "and that was that. Moving on..." to the plot.
"Turns out that mice creating the Earth as an experiment... ha, irony?... to solve the universe isn't as funny as you thought it'd be? Have a flashback within a Guidebook entry so you can get out of the plot and into another plot you can back out of so you can get into another plot so..."
Admittedly, I don't have much experience with writing exposition. However, in that limited experience, I've learned that exposition should be limited to what's necessary. Not quite literally every aspect of their subject.
I heard it once explained that exposition belongs in three categories: necessary, flavor text, and director notes. The necessary is what the reader needs to know about the story. The flavor text are details that flesh the world out, but aren’t necessary. Director’s notes are for the writer only: ie gravity exists or the specific political ins and outs.
Isn't... one of the traits of the SCiP Foundation telling a story via what would typically be understood as exposition dumbs? By adding a trait of horror via removing the humanity from a story, to make it more frightening--with part of it from it a ?subversion? of using exposition
I mean... IIRC, the parts of the site written by Dr. Bright, the author (different from Dr. Bright, the character... which itself is a bit of existential horror), are largely the Tales... but the Tales always struck me as an add on "extra feature"... a sort of bells and whistles... but like, I understand I am suppose to be staunchly against Bells and Whistles... and entirely about being purely Meat and Potatoes and no fun allowed--Fundamentalist Charter Accountancy and all that
Then SCP is the extreme necessary, remember and nowadays, people ignore it but… _context and framing matters,_ and in the SCP documents context, we’re reading confidential that has several details of it inked out and edited out for either _safety reasons or it being only available for high officials_
@@James-oj6ru I’m not the SCP author Bright. Frankly I wouldn’t want to be because he’s a terrible person.
Well… I’m actually not talking to you @@purplehaze2358, specifically talking to Katrina… though why is the author a terrible person? I don’t know much about SCP authors, all and their activities
For me exposition is one of my favorite things in writing. I love the challenge it brings to incorporate information about the world in a both engaging and natural way. I worked on the world for hours not to lecture the audience, it’s to brag to my writer friends about how much I did!
Exposition delivery is the most telling sign of the ability of a writer
A long long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, someone invented an opening exposition dump that fans would riot over us cutting...
Honestly if you're going to info dump, that's really the way to do it-
* Brief summary with minimal proper nouns
* Awesome music to get the audience excited followed by mysterious, peaceful music to let it all sink in
* Gradually display the text in a manner that the audience isn't overwhelmed but feels enough of a sense of urgency to actually read it
Usually I skip the ad segment, but I'm so invested in this narrative that I'm rewatching your backlog
I’ve been a self-proclaimed writer for over a year now (though I only recently got good at it so I’m still basically a novice). How I’m gonna handle exposition is as follows:
Main character spent their formative years in a dystopian land. In other words, not knowing anything about the outside world. This means they will ask questions that the reader may also have (but I’m hopefully gonna keep it limited to relevant things, not like “oh when was Rodrick Ballscratcher the Third’s outdoor lavatory built?”).
Second book sees a different protagonist exploring different lands, a perfect opportunity for world building with some lore thrown in every so often.
It’s gonna be multiple books long, assuming I actually finish any. (Bloody procrastination). So no need to rush through exposition or condense everything into one or two books.
Plenty of the lore will tie in to the main focus, depending on what focus there currently is (not every last bit, but on occasion. Maybe “plenty” is an exaggeration).
To top it all off, I have a glossary of sorts for jotting down notes and ideas. If released publicly, it would be pretty much ideal for those that want *all* the information. (The damn file got corrupted but thankfully I remember most of the stuff in it).
Edit: Nearly forgot to mention that I made a historical timeline, meaning there’s room for prequels and spin-offs. That opens the door to having the exposition being spread out. In other words, the main series has the compulsory exposition while the spin-offs provide extra historical exposition.
Meanwhile, Death Note rips a hole in the space time continuum for making exposition more interesting then a resurrected Palpatine sending 1 billion Death Stars to conquer the galaxy with no explanation.
Just Put it in the eye catch
One of the most effective ways to deliver exposition is to use it to give answers to questions you're already raised in the audience's mind. They're far more likely to sit around for it if you are giving them information that they wanted to know, rather than you front-loading the information and tacitly telling them that this will be on the test.
Consider how Harry Potter doesn't learn what in the world "Hogwarts" is until about the third or fourth chapter. Instead we open with a series of progressively more fantastical events before Hagrid finally shows up to tell Harry (and us) what's been happening.
I like how the beginning sounds even more like a seductive villain speech/explanation than usual. Speaking of supposed villains, my that hydra is quite polite and helpful.
(Also I chuckled at the bit of code at 11:35.)
This is usually why I hate prologues.
They're fine when they're done right, but so many writers just treat them as info-dumps with a heavy handed "You'll need to know this for later!" slapped on your cheek.
I have never read a prologue. If it’s important, it should be chapter 1.
@@surprisedchar2458 Exactly. Or just integrate said information through the story as needed.
Author: Hey, remember that one thing I told you 300 pages ago? It's finally important!
A prologue can still be done really well if it shows something important to the narrative that CANNOT be communicated earlier on.
One example (of many) Is the prologue to a Game of Thrones. (minor spoilers, nothing too big.) It follows a patrol of nights watch as they encounter a group of slaughtered wildlings and then die when the bodies become ice zombies. This works for 2 reasons: 1: it accurately conveys the dark, murder-happy, tone of GoT by having all these characters die. and 2: it sets up the dangers Jon Snow faces as when he arrives at the wall, as it would be impossible to convey that other than really awkward exposition.
Moral of the story: it's not bad in conception.
Didn't game of thrones have a prologue with the winter zombies? Think a RUclipsr said it was a justified prologue because the zombies wouldn't be known until late in the story by the characters but couldn't just be addressed then without coming out of left field.
Not 100% on this since I've absorbed the info through RUclips reviewers and not bothered to actually watch it myself.
@@ineednochannelyoutube2651 Oh yeah, they CAN be done well and when they are, epic. The problem is, they often aren't and they end up as info dumps.
Wow, exposition? I love the entirety of Homestuck!
bro your visual jokes and gags get better and better every episode. "why does your dialogue have hyperlinks to a wiki in it?" had be dying.
If you really just want to dump out information, fun facts, tidbits and quirky details of your setting, why not write a fictional travel guide? Like honestly, I've done that myself and it was pretty fun. Called it "Places, people and how to enjoy the former despite the latter" or something similarly snarky if I recall correctly. By far not my greatest literary work, but I have a soft spot for that little booklet.
Brandon Sanderson wonderfully plays with the audience expectation of exposition in one of his Mistborn stories. (MAJOR SPOILERS for that series, don't read further if you're currently reading it.)
At the start of one of the sequels, a certain character has to be reminded of several events from earlier books that they were present for and really should remember. Most readers will write it off as just some clumsy dialogue exposition and move on. But in fact, it's because the character in question has been replaced by an imposter, something we only find out much later in the story.
That is genius!
I unironically love the Sponsorship Wars! I am so excited for new episodes.
I just wrote a terribly long scene of info dumping that was stupendously long and more boring than ever.....dialogue spanning near seven comic pages with near entire paragraphs for word balloons.
Thanks to this video, I have come up with a replacement that weaves that information into a more tense scene instead, and shortens it to keep the pacing.
Thank you for this video!
The best solution is just to make the "exposition dump" an interesting story in itself - LoTR does this really well, the backstory of Sauron and the One Ring is a classic example of telling instead of showing, but I didn't mind because it's literally Epic.
The movie does it as a prologue, which works well because they can put Sauron on screen. From what I remember in the books, by the time Gandalf actually exposits it, there's plenty of buildup and suspense, so it actually feels satisfying to get some answers.
YMMV on every use of this, but stories within a story are a classic literary technique for a reason.
Honestly, if you do this well the main danger is that the myth or legend will be more interesting that the story around it...
I think a good way to handle exposition is by having it be part of a situation where you expect a lot of info to be dumped. A news broadcast, a mission briefing and watching an in universe advertisement is a good way to do this.
The upside of this is that it both provides information and gives you a shortcut to set the tone almost immediately.
China: “wtf is this? You’re stealing our s***.”
Literature: “so?”
*The Great Wall of Exposition*
1:26
I never realized that Tutorials and Exposition dumps had so much in common.
It all makes sense now!
This Channel here roasts Current Hollywood and Modern Comic-Book-Industry
with basically every Video!!!
@@slevinchannel7589 Basically
Having the story start in an actual school provides a convenient way to tie in exposition while having characters debate about that exposition and, as a result, reveal info about themselves. An officer's academy, for example, can send characters on plot advancing missions and provide a setting where characters can ask questions about basic aspects of the world.
I‘ve found that „discovery writing“ (TWA explained the technique in one of his videos, unfortunately, I don’t remember which one) works quite well for this: You make rough outline of the story as well as the setting etc., kind of like a zoomed out map containing only the most essential information, and then, as you‘re writing, lay out the information as you „discover“ it. The more you plan beforehand (i.e. „architect writing“), the harder it might get to distribute the information evenly but still in a way that feels natural. That is, making sure that not every chapter contains the same amount of information, since there is never a continuous stream of knowledge in real live either.
It‘s a bit hard for me to explain, since I didn‘t really „learn“ to write, nor spent time „finding my voice“. I just… started, and kept doing it (after some years of rarely writing at all, except for school and uni purposes), until I was writing nearly every day if possible. I sometimes wonder if it would have been more effective to properly learn some of the techniques, though…
(Sorry, if that was a bit long and rambling.)
Dude I love your videos, I've been struggling with writing lately because of depression and other stuff, but the content here always makes me wanna dabble in my stories a bit with all the good advice.
A cool thing I did earlier today with exposition is to have the smart scientist character actually make an incorrect guess, not an illogical guess, an actually believable one about the situation that is still smart, but wrong, then I had a character come in that actually had experience in the situation, allowing them to naturally do the correct answer exposition, but during all of it, the characters have a natural back and fourth about the plan, slowly figuring it out for themselves as the truth arises
3:10 my headcanon for why the non-player is now in a completely different fantasy story is because they checked out so much they didn't realise their D&D game had ended.
I remember an author who literally wrote the entire story as an info dump in the first paragraph and then the last seven paragraphs were just filler with the characters doing nothing until it abruptly stops.
Also I love how you wrote a mystery intrigue war political thriller comedy with your sponsorships
Ah, but what about the start of SERENITY? An In-Universe Lecture, inside of a nightmare, inside of a flashback, inside of a holographic archive, inside of an in-dialog-info-dump. Chef's kiss.
7:08, so kind of like in Harry Potter. When Snape ambushes Harry with Chekhov’s Gun questions about potions that he knows Harry won’t be able to answer
I unironically enjoy stories that unceremoniously dump you into the setting with little to no explanation. I find the process of piecing together the world like a puzzle box engaging. I know I'm in a minority when it comes to that, though
I feel the same way, honestly 😂
I mean, that's how a story should flow right? You should know as little as you need to and expand it from there
I'm surprised he didn't mention this but that works great for a fish out of water story.
Some older sci-fi anime are a lot like this. I could mention the Patlabor movies focusing a lot on the geopolitics and factions, mostly through very long dialogue.
I'm somewhere in between. Like, I don't want a piece of media to figuratively drive me out to the middle of nowhere and have to find my own way back, _some_ concrete structure and drip-fed details are welcome. But A) you don't need to tell me literally everything, letting me fill in the gaps myself is welcome; and B) the exposition I *am* force-fed can at least be seasoned to taste (i.e. well-written and organically integrated into the events at hand, adding to them rather than digressing from them).
Request: can you do one on making fantasy/sci-fi towns?
A circular wall stuffed with pseudo-german looking buildings. And there's a river in it. Congrats, you're done!
@@zappodude7591 danke
Also extremely crowded
@@thechroniclegamer4285 some other factors:
1. Location: make sure the town is just randomly placed in some completely random location as well, with no clear economic, political, or social strategy to it's placement. Make a town be in the direct line towards a larger city so it can grow slowly but surely via merchant trails? Nah that's stupid, let's just throw a town in some random field which no one ever goes to, ever. How do the townsfolk survive in such an isolated environment? I dunno.
2. Culture and life: Even though in the real world; many towns and cities have pretty distinct local cultures from each other, in fantasy towns are only distinct in name, because they all look, and act the same from one another, and have the same boring characters inside!
Even Speedwagon is Crying
Bit speedwagon is a fun character, which helps a lot to make exposition more fun, by simply have an entertaining character do it. I mean speedwagon is not bad with it.
In crime procedurals, the leader of the protagonists, you know the one, the one with no discernable expertise in forensics or criminology, serves as the stand-in for the audience to the technical aspects explained to them by the experts on the team; delivering the exposition AAAAAAND explaining the purpose of the "leader" trope.
I can understand 'not enough exposition' being a problem, but what's worse than that is TOO MUCH.
I can trust a writer to try to give me exposition in small bits until they can be peaced together to something coherent later. That CAN sometimes be annoying, but not as eye-rolling as EVERYTHING being force fed to you all at once and NOTHING in the story making sense unless you have all the back story you weren't even there to see carved into your brain.
It was exactly the problem with the Star Wars Sequal Trilogy.
The Original Trilogy struck a balance between worldbuilding and character-development, the Prequal Trilogy focused a little too much on worldbuilding (which I personally enjoyed, nevertheless), but the Sequal Trilogy DIDN'T have any kind of worldbuilding at all, let alone decent character-development.
Too much is a common complaint, but the process you're describing is actually better than nothing being explained at all, which is usually too little exposition.
If you explain too little it seems like you're just making things up and a helping of deus ex machina. They are both equally bad.
@@pendragon0905 Yeah, this is all an excellent observation of what happened with Star Wars. All of the background information for the sequel trilogy had to be found by using secondary sources (novelization, visual dictionary, etc). The PT had a bit too much, but at least we knew something about the world and whatnot. When VII came out, people thought the Republic planet blown up was Coruscant (though I'm pretty sure the system name was dropped. The incredibly stupid way of them somehow seeing the destruction from across the galaxy didn't help, though. Almost as if new reports didn't exist in the Star Wars galaxy. Plus, acting as if the entire Republic was blown up, even though it was just its capital). It was almost as if they were afraid of saying anything.
Remember if you're too low on time to write important info:
"Far too complex for you to understand."
"There's a simple explanation for that"
"A good question for another time"
(Opening Crawl)
*Somehow* the evil emperor from the previous trilogy has returned without any foreshadowing or explanation
If you ever feel like your exposition is a little too much, just add a love triangle to satisfy the viewer.
A transsexual love triangle. Involving preteen children. For Pride Month.
I actually like reading long and detailed expositions. I also like reading encyclopedias for fun. I want stories with chapter long expositions.
Always happy to learn how to do things like they did in the bad old days.
"As you know, I conducted a raid on the Great Library that most said didn't exist."
I think a good lesson I got was from the first review on my first book. They liked the characters and plot, but felt the magic system wasn't explained. I wanted to go the show don't tell route to have the action be a way to demonstrate how the magic worked. But feel the reviewer was right that my approach left more questions unanswered for how everything worked. Not to mention that Terrible Writing just underlined that I was listing words relating to my magic system without giving an explanation. This kind of got me back to the drawing board so I could find a way to fix the problem without an exposition dump. A lot of people I queried about the dilemma suggested I include a character unfamiliar with the magic system of the world, but I felt that approach was boring and overdone. Then it dawned on me to have a character that was self-taught in magic, that way the protagonist could explain how magic works through what they were doing right and wrong. I personally think it's some of the stronger moments in book 2.
I think its a good idea you came up with. Its hard to find the right balance sometimes, and balance is needed. Sometimes things need to be explained. If magic isn't properly explained AND is used and controlled by the main character(s) it could in worst case feel like there is no real stake because they could just fix everything with magic probably. But in case they aren't as much in control of it, then keeping it much more mysterious and unpredictable may work
Actually caught this on Nebula first, had to come here to get the ad segment, felt incomplete without it
I remember in Neal Stephenson's book Cryptonomicon, there is this part where several pages are devoted to describing how the main character eats Cap'n Crunch, and the weird thing is it's actually good. While normally you would want to limit the information to whatever is relevant to the plot, it would seem what really matters is that the reader enjoys it.
It’s a good day when TWA uploads a video, fill with golden advice that will tell me what I already know and stroke my ever growing ego… I’m kidding of course.
Thanks for the new video.
I think the worst one I ever read was in Hunchback of Notre Dame, which had an entire overly long chapter describing the layout of Paris streets, block by block, building by building, as viewed from the rooftop of Notre Dame. Not even pointing out this was from Quasimodo's point of view, just a dry text version of a map.
I think that exposition dumping can work if front loaded sometimes. I mean using anime as an example, to explain the world of my hero academia at the beginning of the series help set the stage. But doesn't disclose every single thing so there's still a mystery and expectation for further growth. I will admit it is annoying when any anime stops in the middle of a fight scene to explain things, such as dragon Ball, or any anime where the main character has to have a flashback to get a power boost, my hero academia also does this. Or even something as fantastic as fireforce, it does kind of ruin the pacing when it is introduced during an intense scene as opposed to outside of it
"aS yOu KnOw I cOnDuCtEd A rAiD oN tHe GrEaT lIbRaRy WhIcH mOsT sAiD dIdNt EvEn ExIsT"
A book can do this very well because you can shove all the exposition into the main POV character's own thoughts and it generally won't interrupt your experience.
A fish out of water or inexperienced young teen can also serve very well as an exposition device because as a newcomer, he would need that fictional world explained to him. it gets bad when its exposition dumped in and told to characters who should probably already know all of that stuff. this happens sometimes in Harry Potter and Thor.
you also should not dedicate entire long speeches to exposition, but rather thread it through slowly. we should learn things about this world at the same time our main hero does. give us bits and pieces over time, then in the climax, it all comes together and we get the full picture. like a murder mystery. you get hints throughout the movie, but at the end you still want your big villain's motive rant.
I unironically like info dumps. I specifically love watching lore videos on sifi and fantasy series that i'm interested in but aren't fully sure I want to actually invest in specifically because there convenient info dumps. It's the biggest hurtle I need to overcome in my own writing, avoiding the info dumps I love so much.
Lore videos huh, are you a wh 40k fan by chance?
@@takebacktheholyland9306 Is it that really obvious?
@@ianyoder2537 I mean, when it comes to lore it's the undisputed king by an insane margin.
and because I also enjoy luetin09
@@takebacktheholyland9306 I think it's because 40K has great stories, they just aren't great at telling those stories. Like the war of the beast, the cluster f^ckes that where the siege of varax and the fall of kadia, the entirety of the ultra marines ... even though I hate the ultra marines because of mat ward they've made a descent comeback but I still hate them and think their a perfect example of all of my gripes about 40K.
Well, if you love info dumps, than some others must surely feel the same. If you can do them well, I guess you could just keep them.
Am just astounded that this man made sponsorships not only watchable,,, but enjoyable??? WITH PLOT???
I knowww this isn't a new thing but the writing seems to improve and I'm just here to appreciate it.
LEGIT QUESTION: Why stop here?
Even if we ignore 'Hello Future Me' being famous for being another Version of JP,
theres at least that 1 video that is the perfect Spiritual-Sibling to this one here:
Hbomberguys Video about RWBY.
It mentions many of the same Problems but explains them with different Jokes and other Humor
and thats not even all to say. Natural Exposition is a whole Segment in said video.
And you know who else criticized with Humor? Jay Exci and Krimson Rogue.
I remember when Star Ocean 3 came with a dictionary in the menu that was full of information designed only to fill you in on aspects of the world that were not important to understand the plot - in other words, explaining offhand references to previous games, explaining real life astronomical terms, filling in events between games for those who were curious, and giving amusing scientific explanations for why dragons slept on piles of treasure.
Final Fantasy XIII looked at this and failed to understand any of the above reasons to have a dictionary.
"As you know" is such a weird convention. You're basically lampshading how the characters have no reason to be mentioning that fact except to inform the audience, as if that somehow makes it better.
I think one way you could solve it is by having the protagonist explain whatever the "as you know" part is. That way it would demonstrate their keen knowledge and intelligence about X subject
I find expositions been a huge problem for me.
I always either write too much or too little so this video is very much appreciated :D
Agreed, the same thing happens to me, and it helps to find a balance between the two.
Same here, I have a lot of magic system stuff to explain, and this _excellent_ advice is sure to help.
@@mariustan9275 Absolutely, the most reliable of sources :)
@@Green-3c34y65vrbu What I've done, and my readers appreciated, was sprinkling the aspects when they became plot relevant.
It helps a bit that the characters haven't figured out all aspects of my system, and a plot thread is about them figuring out how to reverse engineer a spell.
I've sprinkled some worldbuilding, too. How the calendar works in a chapter, how the hours on a clock in another, and so on.
It's a balance, friend. Practice makes perfect or close enough.
The first hour of Final Fantasy XIII suuuuure did love leaving out information in a way that was DEFINITELY NOT confusing
i love this channel.
i have just started to make a webcomic too, so i will finally be able to apply everything i learned here!
Tell me when you get the first chapter posted
@@cara-seyun sure!
@@cara-seyun Second that idea.
As much as I love One Piece, the biggest thing I hate about the anime is how frequently it uses flashbacks. I'll be enjoying a fantastic final battle of an arc, then I get clubbed in the face by unnecessary flashbacks for 10 episodes of the 14 episode battle. SOOO often, the flashbacks will be about events which literally just occurred in the previous episode, and I can even remember 3 occasions when there have been flashbacks to an event that occurred in the very same episode. To top it off, often there will be stretches of an arc where they play the SAME flashback more than 10 times, as if the entire audience has the memory of Dory from finding Nemo.
I love One Piece, but I hate the overuse of flashbacks. Flashbacks are useful in story telling, and can help build dramatic tension, but when overused they are tedious. It's like when your parent is reminding you of something you already know for the umpteenth time. I always skip forward several minutes of an episode just to skip these.
If we're being frank, only about 30% of One Piece flashbacks strike me as necessary or useful in the plot, such as when they call back to events from at least one arc before, or to a specific character's past that we wouldn't otherwise see. If one were to remove, say, 60-70% of flashbacks from the series based on repetetiveness, thus scrunching episode and arc runtimes, I estimate the 1,030 episodes would compress down to about 930.
The one series i know that made deliberatly dry exposition awesome was log horizon as learning was kinda the main characters whole stick. He is a strategist, someone who is weak and who found his only real strength is to support others. Even the "as you know" trope was turned on its head as one character thought shiroe knew the basics alreadywhile the guy actually was absolutely clueless and had to actually get the other to monologue. The presentation, atmosphere and music helped
This Channel here roasts Current Hollywood and Modern Comic-Book-Industry
with basically every Video!!!
"Stay a while and listen"
You got me right there 😅🤦♂️
The sponsor segment at the end is by far one of my favorite parts in these videos! It’s wild! It literally leaves to wanting to watch the next sponsorship
I've been looking forward to this subject. Bad use of exposition is one of the number one complaints in my writer's group.
It is amazing how many stories you can skip the info dumb chapter/exposition and still understand whats going on perfectly fine.
I think my favorite use of exposition dumps is Nern from LISA, who is introduced as a storyteller like he's going to give you a lore dump about the worldbuilding. But instead all he does is go off about his personal life and the one time he gets close to actually talking about exposition, he's like "oh that's boring" and changes the topic.
As an anime fan, I've seen the action-pausing info dump too many times.
Want to know who's good at visual exposition? Robert Zemeckis. Particularly with Back to the Future and Who Framed Roger Rabbit.
Rising of the Shield Hero is the most recent anime (that I watched) where this happens. It may be a battle between powerful characters or some giant monster trying to eat everyone, but the infodump through DIALOGUE completely haults the enemies, it's amazing
Info dumps, harem shit, and chosen one tropes make me nope out of so many anime series halfway through the first episode.
I think part of that comes from the awkwardness of adapting a manga into an anime. You never really appreciate how a line said mid-attack should take ten seconds until it actually does.
@@battlesheep2552
Ah, yes. The Talking is a Free Action trope.
If there wasn't any it would just be mindless violence and you wouldn't get any backstory.
Unironically I actually REALLY LIKE, even LOVE infodumps. I mean lore, and worldbuilding is always the most interesting part to me, so the infodumbs are interesting... kinda by it's very nature really(and that's not an easy task to make them not be). It's what I watch or read things for. The character arc and all the other stuff like that? Not nearly that interesting and they pretty much become interesting BECAUSE of their relevance to the universe - so to the lore and worldbuilding.
Actually for a few years already I keep myself more to fandom-based literature (aka fanfictions) and even though they are more likely to have more exposition... I still more often than not find the exposition to be too small, too little or in other ways just lacking. Sprinkling exposition little by little throughout the story not only won't always make sense (as not always there is place for it in given scene) but also hardly ever would be satisfying, because that way it usually won't be much of it. It is also kind the reason why I like multiverses (aka crossovers) as they give so many opportunity to explore the lore and worldbuilding. Or a characters which just enter the wide big world not knowing much about it yet and thus the reader can learn about world with them.
And teasing little details... for most of the time is more annoying than fun(and it never would actually tell more than "10 page essay on the subject". Unless the essay is EXTREMELY bad). Though I'm myself kinda guilty of that... and as much as I agree exposition should drive narrative stakes and tension (which I of course try to do), I can't exaclty agree about the immersion part. I mean exposition is main thing that make immersion even possible, it's key factor for that. That how it's delivered (and how well it is made to be part of the story) does matter of course, but it has to be really bad (on the level that I think is VERY HARD to achieve not on purpose) to really harm immersion instead of helping it.