Well done engr I have been following your videos for a while now but I think using a fixed end support is totally preferable in RCC structure as hinging create a huge beam deflection under heavy load
Thanks for the lecture. But I have a few questions. 1. While applying hinge end is possible in Prota Structures, is it obtainable in real life, considering holistically the entire structural behaviour? 2. If it is obtainable in real life, what physical/structural conditions could suggest its use? Thanks.
You're welcome I believe you watched the video to the end, you have seen how the hinge and fixed end impact on the support size and also impact on the reinforcements of the beam and supports. If you didn't watch the video to the end of you skipped any part of the video, I will advise you watch the entire video as every part is important to fully understand the demonstration of the video.
@@EkidelCAD I really did watch it till the end, without skipping any part. My question is if hinge condition is practicable on site. And if in reality, a beam can exist without transferring moments to the supporting columns.
@@victorchukwuemekaokezuonu1290As far as I know, hinged joints are mostly applicable in steel frame structures/precast assemblies. In a regular structure like an insitu cast structure, if hinge joints are the end conditions to minimize the number of reinforcement in the structural members, then a member such as a pin had to be available/provided to account for the absence of transference of moments, without an introduction of such, I am afraid the software basically designed what we input with the assumption that a pin joint would be introduced in real-life whereas iron benders/contractors would simply apply the reinforcement provided in the drawing disregarding the conditions of introducing an hinge joint... Perhaps Ekidel can enlighten us more on this...
![Yeat & Summrs - GO2WORK [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NEFEwfPcXRA/mqdefault.jpg)
Please support Ekidel with "Buy a Super Thanks".❤
Your support will be highly helpful to us thank you ❤
Thanks for the lecture
You're welcome
@@EkidelCADit's my pleasure
Well done engr I have been following your videos for a while now but I think using a fixed end support is totally preferable in RCC structure as hinging create a huge beam deflection under heavy load
🍷👍
Nice content. A question, how is a Hinge End achieved in Actual In- Situ Concrete Structure during construction?
The effect will show on the reinforcement
Well done, sir!
Is the detailing of hinge support different from fixed support?
Fixed support has more development anchor lengths also fixed support introduces more reinforcement at the support region
So far cantilever beam, is it advisable to design as a hinge or a fixed end?
Cantilever are always design as fixed
Thanks Ekidel ♥️ for this video
You're welcome
Thanks for this videos sir 🎉
You're welcome
Thanks for the lecture sir.
You're welcome
Thanks for the lecture. But I have a few questions.
1. While applying hinge end is possible in Prota Structures, is it obtainable in real life, considering holistically the entire structural behaviour?
2. If it is obtainable in real life, what physical/structural conditions could suggest its use?
Thanks.
You're welcome
I believe you watched the video to the end, you have seen how the hinge and fixed end impact on the support size and also impact on the reinforcements of the beam and supports. If you didn't watch the video to the end of you skipped any part of the video, I will advise you watch the entire video as every part is important to fully understand the demonstration of the video.
@@EkidelCAD
I really did watch it till the end, without skipping any part.
My question is if hinge condition is practicable on site. And if in reality, a beam can exist without transferring moments to the supporting columns.
Same questions I was about to ask
@@victorchukwuemekaokezuonu1290As far as I know, hinged joints are mostly applicable in steel frame structures/precast assemblies.
In a regular structure like an insitu cast structure, if hinge joints are the end conditions to minimize the number of reinforcement in the structural members, then a member such as a pin had to be available/provided to account for the absence of transference of moments, without an introduction of such, I am afraid the software basically designed what we input with the assumption that a pin joint would be introduced in real-life whereas iron benders/contractors would simply apply the reinforcement provided in the drawing disregarding the conditions of introducing an hinge joint...
Perhaps Ekidel can enlighten us more on this...
you hinge on simply supported ends,for continuous columns that joint must be fixed.
You can go an read your theory of Structures again