Modeling & Design Verification of Cladding Support/Rail Systems - Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 окт 2024

Комментарии • 18

  • @ALI-Omar200
    @ALI-Omar200 4 месяца назад +4

    I started learning RSA , two years ago , i learned from you engineering more than my university professors, keep it up doctor.❤

    • @CivilEngineeringEssentials
      @CivilEngineeringEssentials  4 месяца назад +1

      Hi there Engr. Ali Omar,
      I am honored by your comment really. Thank you very much. I will keep up the work ^_^
      Regards,
      CEE

  • @jesuscandea512
    @jesuscandea512 4 месяца назад +2

    This channels surpass autodesks!! 💪🏻

  • @saulbalderas387
    @saulbalderas387 4 месяца назад +1

    Amazing work. Always an abundance of knowledge of the subject matter. 👏

    • @CivilEngineeringEssentials
      @CivilEngineeringEssentials  4 месяца назад

      Thnx a lot for being here. I hope that you share this channel with your friends.
      Regards,
      CEE

  • @mwangibenson5199
    @mwangibenson5199 4 месяца назад +1

    That pdf you are referring to Dr. can be very helpful if shared. Good stuff as usual

    • @CivilEngineeringEssentials
      @CivilEngineeringEssentials  4 месяца назад +1

      Hi there,
      Unfortunately, upon asking for permission, I am unable to. The individual who provided me with this PDF file does not allow it to be shared en-mass.

    • @mwangibenson5199
      @mwangibenson5199 4 месяца назад +1

      @@CivilEngineeringEssentials it's alright. Keep up the good work 💪

  • @saq_90
    @saq_90 4 месяца назад +1

    Great video as always. I would have used the design loads and compared it to the screw capacity with a factor of safety in order to account for uncertainties etc. it would also be good to review the buckling behaviour of thin walled sections before yielding - perhaps another video??

    • @CivilEngineeringEssentials
      @CivilEngineeringEssentials  4 месяца назад +1

      Oh, yeah that should have been mentioned. I should have mentioned that the loads applied should be factored loads. I think I missed it.
      Also, your suggestion is amazing! thank you very much
      Stay tuned for more content,
      CEE

  • @lalonalel
    @lalonalel 4 месяца назад +1

    amazing video!

  • @stephanc7192
    @stephanc7192 Месяц назад +1

    Great video

    • @CivilEngineeringEssentials
      @CivilEngineeringEssentials  21 день назад

      thnx ^_^ I am happy it was beneficial
      PS: Sorry for the late reply. I had a ton of things to finish and now I am gradually getting back

  • @IbrahimAhmed-lo9xt
    @IbrahimAhmed-lo9xt 4 месяца назад +1

    Can you do a full design of a multistorey rc building in one vedio ?

    • @CivilEngineeringEssentials
      @CivilEngineeringEssentials  4 месяца назад

      That is a good suggestion and I will try to do it as soon as possible

    • @razvanmure
      @razvanmure 2 месяца назад

      And do it LIVE!
      No 😆 I'm kidding - there is no point. Though I'm sure Editor CEE would aprciate it. I chuckled at his intervention.
      Regarding the technical topic of the video 🤔 I switched the mesh element size from 0.025 to 0.05 and it resulted in a lover top stress value - thus my model would have been ok with 5mm - S355...
      Imagine a situation where someone like you and someone like me would be asked for an opinion in such a situation and I wouldn't think about changing the mesh (or I would use another software) => Ignorance would lead me to present a better results (material wise = a more economic result). Tricky... :(