Our Legacy, Your Future....Explained!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 авг 2023
- You can support this channel directly through patreon:
/ thunderf00t
or at my amazon affiliate store:
www.amazon.com/shop/thunderf00t
or my other channel: / @voiceofthunder9620 
Развлечения
Sure the world is doomed but for a short time we created quite a lot of revenue for our shareholders.
The exact mindset of American billionaires
For the greater good.
They've set up trust funds, for several future generations of their progeny. But we know they aren't smart about long term motives, only short term winnings.
Can't you even see that global warming is their next grift? If you would just listen to the evidence of the other side with an open mind for even a minute, you'd see that this is just the latest elitist trick to make the peons give up their labour. Ironic that they mostly have socialist and communist supporters or their fascism.
@@BGTech1all capitalists are bad nomatter what country they come from. A Canadian billionaire isn't any better because they say a few nice things sometimes. (Regular people are defending capitalists when they don't own capital so they aren't capitalists but are mad at me criticizing billionaires lol)
I'm guessing the answer is solar freaking room temperature superconductor roadways so we can have levitating cars that charge themselves on the road.
This comment should be top-voted. But the algorithm just doesn't know.
There's no warming on the Hyperloop!
In vacuum tubes to reduce drag.
If only St. Elon would invent this for us! 🙏🏻
lol
The many, many film insert cuts make this a difficult one to follow 😬
We have Bark beetles in Germany too. First the trees get weakened by a drought in spring and then just eradicated by the beetles.
In my area in the so called "sauerland" spruces were planted after WW2 for building material. The result were mono cultures. Perfect breeding ground . And the spruces don't drive their roots deep enough so they can't reach water when a drought hits.
Suddenly after 60-70 years after planting them it got to dry for them in 2-3 years in a row in an area that one was a pretty moist place. No we have huge brown and bald hills instead of cool and dark spruce forests.
Atleast we have som beach trees, birches and oakes left. Still incredible to watch over so few years...
Same here in Slovenia. And our idiots upstairs and even in the forest department still often plant Spruces (Picea Abies) where they shouldnt
I just don't subscribe to either side of the extremists. Yes, we had a little warming in the last hundred years, but significant and lasting climate change happens in the span of many hundreds, thousands, and millions of years like the ice ages followed by warming, repeating over again. With all the hysteria and attempts to reduce CO2, warming is still happening. So, what's all that effort for?! Nothing, a bunch of BS.
Just because we have a little warming now, it means nothing in the greater scheme of things. Thousands and millions of years ago humans weren't pumping any CO2 into the atmosphere, yet there were still several ice ages and warming cycles. Explain that! But of course it makes for great politics while big companies are making tons of money on the fear of people. smh Humans are very adaptable, and have no doubt that we'll manage no matter what comes our way.
Yeah europe has cut down in the past most their large trees what some old cathedrals were built with. Same with wolves and bears.
Hello from Oberberg...yeah, its looking grim...the wooded areas of just 2 decades ago are now wasteland. Add the fact that some older species of trees, even if we want them are on the brink of not being able to live here anymore.
Nature will recover.
As George Carlin said, the planet is not going anywhere, we are.
That kind of sucks for the grandkids though
As any animal population does after it greedily and mindlessly consumes all its resources and has uncontrollable, senseless reproduction
@@robg4472 funny enough Americans don’t have enough of a legacy to care about the future. What are a bunch of a strong independent women of 100 different races who don’t like each other, going to do with a bunch other death affected men with no legacy or children that’s actually an active incentive to use cheap and dirty energy
we are not going anywhere either - in Cambria, Devon or Trias for example when avg tmp was 14°C higher than now life was flourishing. "Global warming" is a problem exclusively for certain countries like USA and GB, cuz they'll be f-ed by the rising world ocean level. Most of humanity will be pretty much OK. Russia will be a total banger for example with most of its land being rejuvenated from the eternal frost.
Warming was never a problem for the Life. Glaciation was.
@@robg4472 it already sucks for us... This year, with el nino was insane. We had storms never observed, record floods, record heat and a fricking tornado where there were none before. Also record breaking hail storms.
Global warming is a +/+ loop and when shit goes exponential we will notice stuff really fast. This summer was unlivable, if this gets worse..
Mankind's history is one of empires rising and falling. The notion of "this time we got it right" will always be extremely improbable, no matter how comfortable it feels.
aztecs 1500AD: lets sacrifice people to control the climate
thunderfoot 2023AD: lets sacrifice people to control the climate
Rome, Ottoman empire, Qing dynasty all called their empires eternal.
For 85% of Earth’s history, it has been in a greenhouse state (no land glaciers anywhere). The other 15% has been an icehouse state that fluctuates back and forth between glacier and interglacial conditions. Interglacial conditions are much shorter than glacial conditions. So really for only about 5% of earth’s history (maybe a lot less) earth has experienced interglacial conditions. Right now we are living through an interglacial state, and the corrupt governments of the world want you to think that our current climate is the norm for Earth.
@@echelonrank3927 For 85% of Earth’s history, it has been in a greenhouse state (no land glaciers anywhere). The other 15% has been an icehouse state that fluctuates back and forth between glacier and interglacial conditions. Interglacial conditions are much shorter than glacial conditions. So really for only about 5% of earth’s history (maybe a lot less) earth has experienced interglacial conditions. Right now we are living through an interglacial state, and the corrupt governments of the world want you to think that our current climate is the norm for Earth.
@@echelonrank3927 I dont think tunderfoot says to sacrifice people to control the climate.
There are newspaper articles from the late 1800s that describe this same issue. It's been known about and actively ignored for longer than any of us have been alive.
Nothing will happen and even if it did you don't have the ability to do anything about it.
Stop pretending you matter.
@@Asfanboy1 why would a pathetic worm bother to post this though? Shouldn’t you be off doing worm things instead of watching climate doom videos?
PS: things are already happening, wake up and smell the doom coming.
what
Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius is often cited for his 1896 work that hypothesized the effect of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels on global temperatures, essentially laying down a foundation for our understanding of climate change.
@@Asfanboy1 The climate will get worse and people will make changes to stop it from getting worse and reverse the effect.
Nuclear power has been around for a long time and, sadly, it's fallen out of favor over fear mongering via some unfortunate disasters (only 1 of which was statistically significant: Chernobyl). Even so, per MWh, it's the cleanest, greenest and safest form of power, all things considered (disasters and disposal included). Renewable sources simply aren't enough. We already have a solution whereby we can move towards an electric paradigm and it's a lot easier to improve the infrastructure and nuclear power plants than it is to sequester CO2 on a global scale. Stop waiting (and wishing) on fusion systems and lets build more (modern and safer) fission reactors. Fusion power is still in the pipe-dream stage and will be this way unless some revolutionary new physics is discovered.
Environmentalists oppose nuclear power at every step, it doesn't fund their religion.
Look at environmental Germany, became poster child of green energy, closed nuclear power plants, and opened even more coal and oil power plants.
This is rinse and repeat at every "green" area.
Nuclear still faces a problem of supply. Some estimates say the most ised form of Uranium will run out in a few decades
@@rsmlinar1720 True, this is where thorium reactors come in - they can reduce the amount of uranium needed by 98% and thorium is basically a waste product for rare earth mining operations. Spent uranium can be "re-burned" (re-fizzed) as well (all that waste can be put to good use). The only issue with these types of reactors is they cost more to build (and maintain), but they are incredibly safe (no superheated steam that can explode).
@@davestorm6718, hey, don't forget to give credit to the KGB for funding anti-nuclear power groups!
Fukushima was a modern plant and really shows why nuclear shouldn't be used in some areas.
It was also a huge event, you can't really write it off as nothing.
Nuclear power is definitely what we need, but we can't just build them everywhere, the number of accidents would probably increase due to the higher number of nuclear plants.
The original sin of mankind always was to ignore knowledgeable people because they make you feel dumb.
We don't ignore them. We harness them. Scientists like thunderf00t are by FAR more responsible for this than just the average person trying to eat and stay warm. They warn us but then participate and perpetuate the same world view.
The original sin of knowledgeable people is making dumb people feel dumb.
Like ignoring most of the “arguments” in this video?
Phil Mason is a complete moron on this topic.
@@Kauffy901 dumb people do that to themselves hence why their dumb.
@@Kauffy901 wise people understand that you are responsible for your own feelings. Other people are, it's your own mind that allows others to make you feel lesser of a human being. Everyone has value, we're all different and have our different strengths.
As a "Zoomer", I already decided that preparing for climate change makes more sense for me rather than prevention.
Beacuse no matter how much more frugal can i already get, the final say will have, and always had people with more power and money than i could ever visualise.
You cannot prepare for that.
And the last 10 generations of them have been fucking it up for us. Part 2 or 3 will be about how nuking the planet and nuclear winter are the only thing that's ever successfully slowed global warming (that dip after the 1940's)...
@@EarlchaosYou can prepare to a degree.
Barring the absolute worst case scenarios, we're not looking at a properly apocalyptic result from climate change; just very very bad results that, sure, cant be totally avoided but you can do things beside just wait for it to affect you.
As one simple example; when I was a kid I wanted to live on the coast; I've since resigned myself to remaining inland and potentially relocating further north and/or to areas less likely to suffer from the increasingly extreme weather.
You are late to the party.
We are all doomed
"People will always prefer a convenient lie over an uncomfortable truth"
Can't remember where I heard or read that, but it rings true every time something important needs to be decided.
Convienent lie? Like We will be flooded byy 2016? Or this won't happen until you are long gone?
Sounds like the tagline of the GOP. 🤔
The actual truth is I don't own a factory or a plane and couldn't do anything about global warming if I tried and that's the tru for 99% of all humans.
@@Asfanboy1after watching the second video I googled what I could do. Turn off a light bulb, recycle, eat vegetables… so nothing then!
Here's the convenient lie: "global warming." Here's the uncomfortable truth: "Declining EROEI."
Here's how you can know: How much does the atmosphere expand per degree of warming as per the ideal gas law (or Daltons law if you make it that far)?
What force increases to prevent the atmosphere from expanding if it isn't?
What is the change in the rate of cooling with respect to the increase in surface area per unit time?
Why doesn't any of the "sky is climate changing" arguments address this crucial coefficient? Because they're lying. You need this basic understanding to make a tire, to make expansion joints in bridges, to calculate the coolant required for an engine block, but magically it's missing from muh climate change eh?
"Two truths cannot contradict each other."-Galileo
So, which is true:
Ideal gas law/Daltons law and thermodynamics
Or
Climate change claims that don't EVER address how much the atmosphere will expand as it heats.
If you'd like a test with quantifiable, independently verifiable, evidence, put a balloon in the freezer with a string taped tightly around it. Or an empty pressure canner on a stove if you're dumb enough to believe in climate change.
The horrible truth is that oil discovery peaked in the 1960s, the western world peaked in EROEI in the mid 90s, the globe peaked in 2018, and you've been told to neuter your children, abort them, not to drive, not to learn physics, do fentanyl, not to buy a house, not to enter the job market and instead get student debt, believe that a virus with a seven day mutation rate that infects bats, pangolins, deer, etc etc can be VACCINATED against with an experiment only given to those dumb enough to take it was a good reason to shut down all countries' economies, and literally every other conceivable lunacy to get you to reduce your fuel consumption.
"When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, is the truth." -Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Now, you tell me how much that atmosphere is going to expand per degree of warming, or, look up declining EROEI. Because the truth is a lot worse than the sky is climate changing.
"You know what this is? This is a snowball from outside." Brilliant, just brilliant
The more I learn about Carl Sagan, the more I respect him.
Sagan was awesome. You should read his book, The Demon-Haunted World.
@@rickyfitness252 Sources?
@@rickyfitness252 sounds like a confession in the form of an accusation
@@rickyfitness252 you can be the worst person on earth and be right about something
@@rickyfitness252 the devil never lies bec why would he need to you will look for the lies and fall into his trap
Thank you for reminding us of the prophetic words by Carl. A beautiful caring mind taken too soon.
There's also a video on here from his last interview named "prophetic warning" or something and it's excellent and depressing in equal parts because you really see the fear he had towards the end of his life of where humanity was headed, and it was fairly spot on.
I'm kind of glad he's not around to see the world of today. He seemed to have so much hope of humans being able to be better than ourselves, but how would he have reacted with the utter celebration of ignorance throughout politics now, or even the mad crazy supercomputers we all hold in our hands, yet use for completely trivial and often harmful matters as we willingly let our data to be sold off by these companies so advertisers will know how better to sell to us?
He would tell you there is no such thing as too soon; that we all go exactly when we are supposed to go.
Second great saying from Carl sagan was "If you can not do calculus you can not be a environmentalist." he was right.
That was a great scientist. His POV was that as a scientist he had to explain science to people who were not scientists. I love his POV. Sadly many scientist don't try to speak just normal language. Phil is one scientist who does it like Carl Sagan did. Sadly those that tell the truth are either not understood or people's "religion" is opposed to it. Even some fairly intelligent people like Ben Shapiro don't get it. Ben is good for politics and some other topics, but he clearly isn't at home in climate science or he listens to the wrong sources.
I'd prefer to call it science rather than prophecy.
Hi Thunderfoot , loved the video, I agree with most of your points in this video, there is however one issue I have with the reasoning behind why global temperatures remained constant during the 1940-1980 period. It likely has very little to do with nuclear power (which I assume is what you are insinuating), since there were only a few dozen mega nuclear plants in the world for the majority of that time period.
The main cause for this is when power generation predominantly switched from coal (high sulfur fuel) to oil (lower sulfur fuel) through the 60's and then gas (effectively no sulfur) in the late 90s.
We know about cooling effects of aerosols generated by factories (when using high sulfur fuels).
Your main point still stands and I absolutely think that the world should turn to Nuclear as our primary source of energy generation.
That's he didn't say because if nuclear what he was hinting at was the industrial boom after WW2 still going because the ECONOMY in the USA. We were building a lot from skyscrapera and bridges to lots and lots of cars, not including all the rebuilding of Europe and Japan. Eventually people (particularly ones with influence $$$$$) got tired of soot covered cars and rivers catching on fire, so we should blame Nixon for all this? Once the pollution became more invisible people didn't think anymore about it, like other things they can't see with their own eyes unless it's some dumb meme or some out of context Deceptive Imagery Persuasion to drive an emotional response. Hence Twitter and space lasers, and now October 3rd when Biden will attack all our mobile devices 🙄 to indoctrinate us all. That's the BS we're fighting the rampant stupidity of people and the rich who prey on it for their wealth.
I'm 29, and am sure that the effects will be getting to my own backyard before I die. While all this is extraordinarily disheartening, steaming on with life as our nature intends is all I can do. I will toast you and your excellent videos every time shit is hitting the metaphorical fan. You built up a heavy legacy, and I appreciate and respect it.
Why even say ‘metaphorical’ fan lol. It’s clearly a metaphor
That's right. Turn on those AC and burn more oil. That's all you can do.😂
I'm 52, and none of the predictions that have been made have come to pass, and there's been plenty.
Go watch An Inconvenient Truth which was made in 2007, and see what they predicted was right. I'll tell you right now, none of it. They also falsified data.
I'm an electrical engineer, when I was 29, I believed it too. That was 23 years ago. When you're 52, you'll be just like I am. You can get to it quicker, if you know what was being predicted 8 years before you were born, and I was in my mid teens. It's all nonsense and hysteria.
Do you think we have more storms now? We don't. We see more, because we have satellites now, we didn't in 1900. Storms that hit landfall have been measured since the 1800's all along the East coast. Neither frequency nor intensity has changed. The models and theories are wrong, or at minimum, WAY out of whack.
We ended up producing more plant life. Our Earth is greener now than it was in 1970.
Engh, you won't believe me, but you'll find out in time. Don't give up your freedom and rights over a false panic. Like everybody did for the last 3 years over the sniffles.
Count how many replies you see here, and compare that to how many you can see.
Nobody is allowed to explain the truth to you. Only Government Approved Propaganda(TM).
Of course you can trust the Government. Didn't we just go through the most deadly pandemic in history? Can't talk about mucosal immunity, can't point out that 30 years of mRNA and DNA vaccine research has been done without ANY success, but then 4 companies came up with a solution all at the same time! What luck, they all independently came to a solution at the same time.
Can't explain anything true to you that goes against THE NARRATIVE.
Don’t have kids, they are extremely polluting. That’s one of the best things all of us can do.
Saves them an untimely and horrible death too.
Reminds me of a poignant drawing of a man in a tattered business suit telling children gathered around a fire in the ruins of society “Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.”
That's sci-fi. In reality, I went to Japanese countryside, and I can't spot anyone. The ruins of de-population are everywhere.
Lmfao utter loony climate cultists, no such thing is going to happen
@@TubeMeisterJC Fuck the solar and wind bullshit. Its just another bubble, waiting to burst. They existed in state, similar to modern for decades, yet never took off (and even in 1800`s it was obvious that smog isnt good). What changed? Pseudo-eco-activists, payed by largest oil companies in the world? Even if everyone did, nothing will change. Even 100% clean enerdgy will require huge mining operations to just keep existing, that do MUCH more damage then any amount of energy production. And it is unfixable. And never will be.
For 85% of Earth’s history, it has been in a greenhouse state (no land glaciers anywhere). The other 15% has been an icehouse state that fluctuates back and forth between glacier and interglacial conditions. Interglacial conditions are much shorter than glacial conditions. So really for only about 5% of earth’s history (maybe a lot less) earth has experienced interglacial conditions. Right now we are living through an interglacial state, and the corrupt governments of the world want you to think that our current climate is the norm for Earth.
@@TubeMeisterJC The problem is that short of going to live a very primitive lifestyle there's not much the individual can change. I have the luxury of not needing to drive to work so I avoid that, but my work is energy intensive so that itself carries a large carbon footprint. I can't change the equipment I use for my job so that falls to the company, I can change to more eco friendly products but there needs to be an effort on the company that supplies them to ensure that they are in fact more eco friendly. The sad reality is that the bulk of consumers do not have any significant choices they can make to slow this down, we need policy and regulations on companies to require them to do this, but that'll never happen because there's too much money to be made. So like with pretty much everything else, as a species we're going to have to break it before we seriously care about fixing it.
I heard about this as a kid, later went on to study some aspects at uni, the writing was pretty much on the wall. At one point it made me sad, then I just felt kinda fatalistic. We saw a thing, had opportunity to do some things, needed leadership to step up. It didn't and still doesn't. Now I just feel like an observer. Someone asked me once was I worried about climate change? and honestly I am not, there was a problem we should have worked on, we didn't and we will see those repercussions. Such short lives, and lack of vision. Old men and trees and some such. But that is human I guess.
What the hell are you talking about? What did you study at uni? What do you suggest is happening, what "writing on the wall" are you talking about?
not having kids allows me to not worry about the absolute horror of climate change. a "cool detachment" you could say (quote taken from 'hypernormalisation')
@@itemushmush What "horror of climate change"??
I envisage a Mad Max style future where spastics like Shapiro continue to deny that everything being a desert is because of global warming.
I no longer worry about climate change because we are living it now. I feel for younger generations. People have been sounding the alarm for years.
The thing about advancement is it usually comes in a form nobody suspected. The kids in 60s were told they will be taking field trips to space in 21st century and flying cars, but instead we have miniaturized computer into our palm.
otherwise known as "afrotech"
Sixty-four plus self-reinforcing loops are currently engaged. Do what you want. It means nothing. 🤕
Abandon Ship! 😂😂😂
well, people hate when nuclear is proposed so... 🤷♂
I don’t know much about nuclear energy but would it really even help that much or just be a small solution
1985 was a great year for music.
Oh, yeah, I know!
Not so good for fashion or hair styles though
So many bangers.🎵
🤘Including Jane's Addiction 🤘 Peace/JT
@@johnthompson6374 - a favorite for sure
"Lately I've come to see the solution and it begins with me. But I'm so fallibly human I pick the lock but will not turn the key." - Bad Religion (My Poor Friend Me, 1993)
Humans aren't doing anything and can't stop corporations even if they tried.
The writing on the wall, goes much much further back then many of us even know :
>>In 1896, a seminal paper by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius first predicted that changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels could substantially alter the surface temperature through the greenhouse effect. In 1938, Guy Callendar connected carbon dioxide increases in Earth's atmosphere to global warming.
Like any lifeform
A new record of lasting over 10 minutes before mentioning Musk.
I hate it so much when he does that, i watch his stuff quite rarely because of mandatory ten minutes of reused Elon Musk segment. We know he is piece of shit, obsessing so much over him is mental.
lol yep. Although most of this video was just clips from tv shows. What he basically said is climate change is happening because we put co2 and other green house gases into the air, we've been doing that for a long time so it will take a long time for it to go away, tree planting doesn't work and climate change deniers are idiots. Note how that didn't take me 23 minutes to say.
Almost. 9:44
As long as Musk runs around and acts like a know-it-all - I actually don’t want him to let up on him. Keep calling these people out.
Nice observation, I hope you got the rest of the video too
I remember my aunt telling me that in 1984/5, when she was head of programming for Berlusconi's new private TV channel, an Italian scientist presented to them the idea for a program to address the problem, he outlined the risks, the causes and the consequences.
My aunt liked the idea, but the high-ups did not want to hear about it and nothing happened.
In 1984 Berlusconi started his TV empire saying that "people don't wanna come home to watch some boring professor saying boring things in black and white, People wanna see girls in bikini dancing catchy music in a set full of colorful lights"....he was bloody right.
So you like watching fat, greedy, money-grubbing basement-dwelling liars on RUclips instead?
If only your aunt had proposed "girls in bikini dancing catchy music in a set full of colorful lights addressing the problem of climate change, the risks, the causes and the consequences..."
@@IronFreeeYou see solutions, not problems. I like it.
the problem with you just said is on the first row: "private" tv channel. if it would have been the state channel it would have made more sense. but it's not silvio berlusconi's duty to educate the masses.
@@LocnavLivoc sure took it up to himself to fuck the masses up big time though.
Can't wait to see the two following parts... Do you have an estimate of when you will be uploading them?
I’ve been a fan of yours on and off for 10 years. This is by far your most powerful and succinct work you have producer.
Agreed
Yes yes the world is ending we are all going to die. Humanity has a fascination with its own demise.
Yeah. Pretty sobering.
@@Annou7laactually, humanity seems to struggle with looking at the facts when the truth they tell is hard to stomach.
Much easier to dismiss it with "yes yes we're all going to die, bla bla bla", isn't it?
But not a word about the cause of this problem. He even implies that it's human nature (when there was no such problem during the first 99.9% of mankind's history).
We cannot reduce CO2 emissions without massively reducing the GDP. If we do that, then people will die from starvation before they die from global warming (Okun's law). All the countries in the world are trying to increase their GDP, not because "their human nature makes them want more and more", but because they want to prevent people from starving, basically.
Why is it not possible to reduce the GDP without people starving? If they could live with half our GDP in the 1950s, then why can't we? Can't we just produce what we need and live a simple life without destroying the environment? Well, there is one single problem, that appeared a few centuries ago, that prevents us from doing that (and that I won't describe because it would need a long message). And Thunderf00t is completely ignoring it. But it is the root cause of the problem.
What's going to be so pathetic is watching all the conspiracy theorists questioning "How can the Hoover Dam just run out of water?!?!" in 15 years.
The dumbest people you know very soon: "Why didn't anyone notice this before now or say something?!?!?"
They'll blame HAARP and/or China
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha omg this is soooooo funny ha ha ha. 🎉🎉😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
15 years from now? Alright, I'll hold you to that. See you in 15 years when the Hoover Dam is still full of water and I come back to laugh at how stupid you were for saying this.
"We don't know who struck first, us or them. But we do know it was us that scorched the sky."
"Live with me if you want to come."
Sarnoldo McBlackegg
I mean in the film they did it to stop the robots but in reality I wouldn't be surprised if this is a climate change solution not to scorch the whole sky but a part of it to prevent as much sun from getting in. I mean that's basically what cfcs do anyway through the albedo effect.
Kinda was expecting to read in the thumbnail:
Your future?!... BUSTED!
I am guessing Thunderf00t's "solution" involves gigatonnes of sulphur dioxide in the stratosphere.
people were never going to give up the easy life and those who are making a profit from it were going to tell you everything is fine
Well. When people see they can profit from the eco way and those that are profiting or heavily invested in oil lose more than they gain. It is when change will take on a new effect
Take when TF done the sodium experiment with the injectors, that places in ships becomes a new viable business model. And one, where ships can predict the cost of fuels thus profits more. Which would you chose if you could add green credentials to your ship
I'm not giving up anything bud. All pollution comes from China and India. Not like we are actually affecting anything significant anyway, only extremist climate cultist models suggest any danger to us
"Dont Look Up"
This will be a safe video where nothing dangerous happens, I can feel it
Too bad Thunderf00t is such an idiot about what happened in Maui.
the safest one actually
Only propaganda.
I approve of your avatar, Cyan Garamonde...
@inutamer365🤡😂
Brilliant!! Looking forward to the next 2 parts!!!
9:41 Damn, thunderf00t is sure living lavish. 3 times the energy usage of mankind.
"It's a cool place, and they say it gets colder
You're bundled up now, wait 'til you get older
But the meteor men beg to differ
Judging by the hole in the satellite picture
The ice we skate is gettin' pretty thin
The water's gettin' warm so you might as well swim
My world's on fire, how 'bout yours?
That's the way I like it and I'll never get bored"
"25 years ago they spoke out and they broke out of recession and oppression, and together they toked and they folked out with guitars around a bonfire, just singin' and clappin', man, what the hell happened?"
"Mr. Wizard can't perform no god-like hocus pocus"
Smash Mouth tried to warn us and we didn't listen.
@@bonemar66 PLOT TWIST
smash mouth was an industry plant band from the oil companies. they made songs about climate change and had everyone singing along about it
@@bonemar66 they were making fun of you...
This is hilarious... I'm gonna go cry now
🎶Somebody once told me the world was gonna roll me
I ain't the sharpest tool in the shed 🎵
The sad thing is, that those who should listen, won't. And that those who are listening have little impact on the issue. While it is true that each of us can deliver our part to stop this, the solutions needed have to take place on a wider scale, only to be realised through governmental authority.
And unfortunately many in government currently prioritise the interests of huge multinational companies and the elites who are more responsible, as with how our current global financial system is, these companies pulling out of a country can lead to huge economic ramifications because their systems are reliant on them now.
The system has become too focused on immaterial billions and trillions going through the digitised financial sector instead of the real amounts societies used to be based on.
I mean what we as individuals can do is turn the valve on the first gas canister 0.000000045 degrees maybe a bit more if we invest in things that lower the carbon footprint for others. I hope in the videos that follow this we get some actual hope come out of it.
Completely false, and stop blaming others: *WE consumed the plastics, gasoline, textiles, chemicals, technologies, medicines, fertilizers, and insecticides to create the convenience of the world we live in.* Nothing is produced when there is not enough profit to do so. It is US that drove this change, THEY just provided the means for US to do it. WE always had the choice but we chose not to change. We are where we are because of our choices.
@@LoremIpsum1970 Okay pick 1 and don't buy it for a year. You won't be able to. Literally everything you buy created some sort of carbon footprint including the food you need to live. Now I can do my part and maybe buy some solar panels and maybe an electric car but then I've maybe cut my carbon footprint and maybe 1 or 2 other people's because there is less co2 from power and transport but most people cannot afford solar panels and an electric car so how is it there fault if they are just doing what they need to survive. There needs to be government level fixes for the problem because people cannot afford the solutions.
@@matthewtalbot-paine7977 Wrong again. Your thinking is on having the same lifestyle but you can't, you'll only get there by abandoning it and finding an alternative way to live. The modern world is built on fossil fuel, we'll not get to a sustainable, renewable energy world in our lifetimes, if ever. This is the choice, you have to pick the other or nearest to the other by giving up 'stuff'. Otherwise, it's all just hypocrisy.
I live in northeast PA where are ash trees are being decimated by the ash borer, the maple trees and hemlocks are dying of some kind of weird disease. My neighbors have an affinity for cutting down trees, but they never plant any. Instead of the children playing in streams, rivers, creeks, and lakes, they go to water parks and swim in chlorinated pee water. I suggest a wonderful book by Neil Postman called Amusing Ourselves to Death. His follow-up book is called Technopoly. Both are prophetic.
I was influenced by The Sheep Look Up by John Brunner He Wrote Stand on Zanzibar
Thunderfoot went all out and philosophical and wild on this one. I'm convinced we are doomed, but I will definitely tune in for part 2. Oh BTW, I'm convinced we are doomed (I like to say WASF) even without global warming. That only makes it a LITTLE quicker.
When I was a kid our towns river used to freeze over every winter and i would get a picture of me and my dad stood on it. It hasn't frozen for the last 25 years. That's enough for me to place my faith in the science.
Jup. Real winters are a thing of my childhood. And that shows me a trend that is not going to bode well...
@@laurensa.1803Ok and where I live we averaged measurable snow every 7-10 years. Now we average 3 years. So is it global warming or cooling? None of this is settled.
@@TheBlindingwhite An often mentioned effect of global warming cound be disturbances of the gulf stream, making winters in places like Denmark much colder. So its no so straight forward just getting hotter everywhere as you seems to believe is required for global warming to be a reality.
@@TheBlindingwhite It is called GLOABAL warming for a reason. No one is interested in your or any one particular place, but the global average has been steadily climbing. And this is settled, known and measured for at least 50 years.
@@TheBlindingwhite Dunning-Kruger-Effect really hit you hard, huh?
Mildly amusing that the greenies of the 70s through the 90s, antinuclear antics got us here.
You could argue pulling the third world up hasn't helped. Population growth in areas where its unhelpful they flood the first world adding more demand. Let's not pretend china's not poison the earth in many ways.
I can't speak for them, but i've learned about some of the horrors from the 20th century that led to that. If we widely adopt nuclear power then it has to be done right.
@@rixille If I recall correctly, This chap pointed out that there hasn’t been an accident at a nuclear reactor that was built post the 1960s. I’m sure we’ve picked up a few things since then. Let’s suggest for a moment that we didn’t. As a worst case scenario, surely a couple of localised irradiated patches would be preferable to the current cataclysm being put forth?
@@mkealy7529 The mentality should be that no irradiated patches are acceptable that way we don't get lazy. It's not just reactor meltdowns, it's the handling of nuclear waste, the maintenance of the plant and its infrastructure and anything else related. If you look up superfund sites, you'll see cases where disposal of nuclear waste contaminated barrels were dumped in a landfill contaminating ground water. We don't need that to happen ever again, and many other incidents.
Another Connections-like intro. I love it. It answers a lingering question I had about using say nuclear energy for everything (even automobiles, perhaps via batteries). No, it would not heat the planet appreciably, even though virtually every bit of the energy produced would turn into heat in the end.
In the Americas (USA & Canada), you can definitely see that the biggest problem is not the Democrats vs Republican discussion, but just plain simply: Corporate greed. Both parties did it and continue to do it. Pay us money, dear companies, dear climate waste producers, and we keep our mouths shut.
Yup
this is bullsht. companies exists to make profit. their ceos are paid to make profit, employees are paid to help to make profit. policy makers are those who can make rules for companies to follow - emission allowances, green taxes/benefits/subsidies... you cannot expect ford to say "we stop doing big trucks it is not good for environment", cause gm and even tesla would be happy about it.
@@romansitner8345 you basically agreed with everything OP said only confirming companies runs on greed - he also explained why they wont make any of those policies you suggested - lobbyists and legal bribes aka "pay us and we keep our mouth shut" so honestly not sure what you think you disagreed with exactly?
Well, what do you expect when you have a communistic/fascistic government running things. Leftist governments rarely end well for the general populace...
@@romansitner8345exactly.....so what about it is bullshit? Or do you mean it's bullshit like you're agreeing it's terrible?
Confused here
I forgot Ben Shapiro was a climate change denier. He’s not an expert in any science but he’ll just deliver lines in a monotone voice and proclaim victory.
Sagan was far from the first to raise public warning. Asimov was a well-respected scientist as well as a prolific science-fiction author - he (amongst others) was speaking about anthropogenic climate change in the late '50s. And there was serious consideration in the scientific community about it (though not actual worry, yet) as far back as the late 19th century. If you want to really draw a long bow on the topic, the ancient Greeks (!) were already speculating that humans could influence the climate.
Hi! Got a reference on the Greeks speculating on influencing the climate?
Interesting enough you can go as far back as nearly 200 years to find people talking about the consequence of industrial outputs, (unlimited) economic growth based on consumption and well Co2. I mean ... this is not rocket science after all. The moment you know how Co2 is increasing temperature and that humans continue to add Co2 to the atmosphere it's just about adding two and two together. Quote :
"In 1896, a seminal paper by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius first predicted that changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels could substantially alter the surface temperature through the greenhouse effect. In 1938, Guy Callendar connected carbon dioxide increases in Earth's atmosphere to global warming."
There was an official US government film made back in the 1950s regarding climate change and doing something about it. So the US government knew the facts then, but at the point where they _could_ have started to react, _and_ persuaded the world to join in - the time when scientists were held in high esteem - they actually did the opposite. And now it's too late.
Yet here we are in 2023, and nothing within the "man made climate change" hypothesis can be proven via the scientific method.
@CrniWuk What? No way! Obviously nobody ever said anything about climate change until Al Gore.
Any time someone starts on with the whole global warming routine, I ask a few things:
Is the planet actually getting unusually and/or significantly warmer?
If so, is it mankind's fault?
If so, is there anything mankind can do about it?
If so, is there anything mankind WILL do about it?
At any step of that, I'm varying levels of skeptical for a plethora of reasons.
I like thunderF00t because each video is backed up with data and formulas. But this clip is just another he said that and he said otherwise.
When I was a child the whole subject if climate change was treated as a hypothetical scenario, an imaginary setting of what could happen if humankind didn’t change its ways. I remember that even as a child it made me incredibly angry, but even back then I understood how powerless I was to do much about it. Now that it’s actually happening and I’m an adult, I can’t help but feel the same but also disappointed in how this all has been handled and will continue to be handled in the years to come. Humans don’t act until it’s too late. It’s been proven time and time again, and I really think that we will start seeing some catastrophic events in the coming years.
"Now that it’s actually happening" it's happening alright, the woke news and media told me! Th-th-there's "scientific consensus" and stuff! Proof? What're you, a bigot?? We don't need no alt-right proof!
It's never too late to have children so you can care about legacy 500 years later.😂
I know it makes me so mad
@@AlexBarbu this current civilization is built on oil. Without oil, nobody can have better life. I hope you one day realize that.
I don't know how old are you, but when I was a kid, it was the ozone layer issue. Only heard about the co2 prob around my 20s
I havent been able to leave my house or breathe properly in days. Half of my state is on fire, and its awful- yet STILL, every cool day I have to wheeze through idiots saying 'its cold out, global warming is fake'
I don't understand. Smoke is proof of global warming, but cold days aren't proof against global warming?
@anyfriendofkevinbaconisafr177 "cold days" are not global phenomena... so how would they be?😂 you need to average the temperature of the whole world to determine change in the GLOBAL warming or cooling
@anyfriendofkevinbaconisafr177 secondly she didn't say it was "PROOF" of anything... her statement implied it was CAUSE not EVIDENCE for(proof is for math)
Poor land management and fires are not proof of global warming. Why do people assume warming is bad. Why do people think the climate can remain static. It's always changing. Plants would love more CO2. It makes photosynthesis more efficient. Nearly all life on earth depends on co2 being turned into sugars and proteins aka food.
@@anyfriendofkevinbaconisafr177I get your name is a joke on the 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon... but it's sooo ironic seeing as the man has been an outspoken advocate of stopping global warming for 33 years this year!!!
It's OK, I'll leave the fridge door open.
We need to go back to the Stone Age so we can avoid going to the Stone Age in the future.
Don't forget that 60% of mammals are domesticated animals, 36% are humans. 1/3 of all birds are poultry.
This is by biomass, right? Crazy stuff, I'll just eat lentils instead. (Canada is the world's largest producer and exporter of lentils)
@@pdblouin yes by mass.
It's why I do some rewilding when I can. It's not that I think it'll save the world, but just to undo some damage as we head into dreadful conditions. So much life that has unbroken threads of descendents going back millions and billions of years is being wiped out simply because one species of intelligent ape convinced itself that the entire planet revolves around it.
@@martincrotty this planet isn't ours. It doesn't belong to us. If anything we belong to it. Why are we more responsible for this planet than the Phytoplankton that caused the second mass extinction.
We are nature, anything we do is natural. There's no difference between us increasing co2 and phytoplankton increasing oxygen. Man the human race is arrogant and entitled.
globalists belong in re-education camps built by the 36%
Thunderf00t running ten unlit blowtorches in an small enclosed space next to a lit blowtorch, nice!
Carbon monoxide. It's a great sleep aid.
Too bad Thunderf00t is such an idiot about what happened in Maui.
@@I.C.Weiner Just the thing for short permanent nap
@@I.C.Weiner None of the canisters cintains carbon monoxide.
You don't know a lot about chemistry, do you?
The water levels in my area are lower every year. Some retention ponds that used to be always wet have been dry for 3 years now. Every year we keep hearing how it’s the warmest yet and people still aren’t listening
Yeah we keep hearing shit. But we can't find any alarming evidence.
Make no mistake, "man made climate change" is a complete scam. But you can't compare ponds or lakes to the ocean. Water consumption and rerouting is the main reason why small bodies of water are depleting.
@@tommy_rotten3984 did we just watch the same video?
Can't wait for the next 2 parts!!!!!!
So we're slowly moving into an apocalypse. Hell this sounds like a modifier you can pick is a world civ game. High power production early but add event the deck "The slow cooker"
It's ok. Only the masses will suffer - the richest people can still move to safer cities in the newly-comfortable climates and hire guards to keep the angry mob away.
This is just like the movie "Don't look up". Death by capitalism
@@vylbird8014 it’s fine the American government has practically destroyed. Any reason I have to care about the future. Why would I fight for a world for Mexicans?
The answer to the Fermi paradox have been staring us in the face all this time.
yupp and we are not making it.
We will make it, sadly, a crisis the size of the black death will happen first, those who survive will finally learn and use technology without destroying the world (we already have them, we just don't use them)
Probably. I think this solves the Fermi Paradox.
But this doesn't necessarily mean we will not be around in a few centuries. I mean, when we start to get more crisis's and disasters and our civilization starts to collapse, people will start dying on a massive scale. This means our Co2 output will get much lower.
It's not going to fun though.
It is kind of funny. When we look at the growth of population of humans throughout history, for the longest time it was never more than a million. In the last 2 centuries this has exploded to a whopping 8 Billion. It's just like the algae in your pond. Most of the time there not 'many' of them. Then suddenly they start exploding. This lasts for a few weeks and the next day they're gone. Poof.
Anyway. There is good chance we're not going to make it if we look at these climate chance models. Even the mildest prediction will be so devastating for our societies it will collapse. And if we reach the tipping point of just 5 degrees more than pre-industrial temperatures the rest of life goes as well. Even bacteria. We'll become just like our sister planet Venus.
Global warming is not an extinction-level event, it doesn't provide a solution to the Fermi Paradox
No it really isn't. Firstly, different aliens would have different atmospheric chemistries and fossil fuel levels.
Secondly, something needs to stop us getting to the high tech stage where we are building interstellar spacecraft.
Living in refrigerated domes on a climate change ravaged earth is good practice for doing the same on venus. (Not that climate change will get that bad. )
So imagine this. lots of wildlife killed off. Humans have been inconvenienced in various ways, there are a few cities that have been abandoned to the sea. A few crops that are much harder to grow. But mostly humans are doing ok. The typical office worker isn't greatly inconvenienced by climate change beyond slightly higher food prices and slightly hotter weather outside their air conditioned office. Tech progress continues. One day we will get that interstellar travel tech.
hey TFoot, instead of joining in on the doom and gloom train, maybe illustrate what it would take in terms of materials and power distribution to transition to low emission energy and some solutions for the poorest people who make up a large portion of the global population?
Ah yes, let's force the poorest nations to use power generation that is many times more expensive than their current means. That is a great way to keep them from developing into competition, as well as a way to kill off some of their population.
Is it just me or do all these movie references do absolutely nothing to communicate whatever idea Thunder is trying to express, but just make watching his videos feel like wading through a mud bath made up of the last 40 years of VCR tapes..?
They are a bit excessive.
But I hear the young ones today like that sort of thing.
Myself, I would just like to know where a good half of them came from. It’s annoying to see something and go...yeah, I remember that one but which episode was it? Or even worse, which film?
It's not just you. I had to stop watching less than 5 minutes in because I was sick of the over abundance of ridiculous clips. He needs to make his point and get on with it - not waste everyone's time with his ham-fisted pop culture references.
haha yeah i kinda agree.. i don't think he's gona change though. He reminds me of my dad. They're both genius eccentrics who love their movie quotes, lyrics, and science.. that's how they see the world and therefore that's how he's gona make his videos. It is annoying though haha@@ryhanon7
I’d really like a super edit of these three videos on this topic without any of the pop culture
It's not just you! Incredibly annoying
Wow this was an emotional rollercoaster for me as a child of the 80s and a scientist who admires Carl Sagan. THX and
I hate humanity for the most part.
Patrick Stewart is an amazing actor. Cream of the crop, grade A human being.
Depends on how you look at it.
Grade A actor, fairly poor quality human being though.
If you judge his characters, Grade A - but if you judge his actions in real-life...
@@DailyCorvid Do tell. Sounds like you have some personal experiences with him.
@@carnaudLol no I have never met him, just reading some of the things his co-workers have said about what it was like working with him.
I think it's clear from those accounts, that the characters he portrayed and gained fame through acting out - where about as far from his real personality as the planets on which he visited whilst he was in character.
A vain, complicated often confusing man - filled with spite towards others and in the end, thoroughly unhappy with his lot despite having everything you'd think a man could want.
I certainly wasn't eager to meet the man after having learned all of that. There used to be a fair amount of material on here to watch interviews and stuff - though most of it's been lawyered into extinction.
But that tells a story on it's own, when you have to legally censor all your ex co-stars because none of them had anything nice to say about you - and all that remains are stock phrases from up-and-coming weenies... You kinda get the impression that he boldly went exactly where people had made it clear he wasn't supposed to be.
And I am not talking about the nether regions of space when I say that. You can still buy books in print with that stuff in, though thanks to ridiculous over zealous censorship RUclips no longer has even reviews of those books.
If you're interested though which it sounds like you might be - I would suggest a trip to your local decent classic bookstore and a request for biographies of anybody who worked alongside him during the prominent years of his Star-Trek fame. It's really shocking to read what people have reported there and no wonder you cannot repeat those things here without comments magically beaming to an unconfirmed planet :D
@@carnaudLOL see what I mean, immediately moderated my reply - despite I stripped out anything you could possibly have learned from it to appease the lawyering.
Here are some unrelated snippers of information you may find interesting elsewhere definitely not to do with Dr Xavier...
- Definitely was never using drugs and prozzies, molesting co-stars on TNG
- Definitely never cautioned for loitering drunkenly outside certain women's apartment and then blaming it on "ghosts" when questioned later
- Absolutely did not cheat on several wives with coworkers after spinning them very convincing tales about hardship in marriage or plying them with sleeping pills and drink
- Never slept with daughters friends despite being literally triple their age and then fell out with said daughter, who will never speak to him ever again
- Definitely not written short stories about said relationships for career short films, changing the names very poorly so that everybody knew
- Absolutely never been accused of being a deviant pervito dorito who uses manipulating speeches with great acting to wangle away from any punishment
- Confirmed also 100% definitely never used lawyers to bully dating interests in or out of little meetings when said person was vulnerable young and drunk (maybe)
Lol see if RUclips's fancy modders can let a bit of truthful free speech go or will this end up in the lawyer stocking like the last one..... Ugh free speech is basically dead being dragged behind the cart in cuffs at this point.
Like I said grab those books! You will enjoy.
It'll probably be geo-engineering; seawater aerosols or something like that. Extend and pretend, that's us.
Scorpion floating on the water after: "lol. LMAO"
Imagine if we all had gone nuclear back in the 50's? Yeah. We might had a chance... But hey, no one should care or lose sleep at night because of it.
You won't. You'll continue driving your car, going to starbucks and using their wifi on your fancy phone, wearing the latest fashion design.
@@nemonucliosis Yeah I'm sure it's the everyday joe's fault not governance or corporations. What is China doing exactly? How do you convince the greed out of a totalitarian dystopia?
@@nemonucliosisno, there are many who are changing, some of us have stopped eating meat, switched to alternate methods of transportation, pushed our political leaders for better housing, energy, environment legislation. Will that be enough? maybe not, but I’m not going to give up & drive a car to buy Starbucks while I wear the latest fashions
We did have a chance with fission nuclear energy. But people got too scared of it. Even if we eventually developed the technology to use fusion nuclear energy that produces little waste. People will still be set against it because of the two scary words: _nuclear energy._
@@OverlordShamalawe also need to stop increasing the world population as so much of our society is now doing nothing for the world
Hell yeah, feed those trees bro.
So... what can we do? There's lots of talk in some circles of terraforming other worlds, but wouldn't it be easier & quicker to re-terraform our own world?
yes
terraforming another world is stupid to do when you dont even do it on your own home world
Not in my backyard, buddy! No backyards on other planets yet. That’s the attitude.
"There's lots of talk in some circles of terraforming other worlds[...]" - Definitely. Basically the same guys who talk about CO2-sequestration, fusion reactors, space solar panel array and whatnot. Because, for all this "ideas", the not mentioned part is
"[Insert magical thingy which will really really (really really) work] sometimes in the future *so I don't have to change even the slightest bit of my f*cking lifestyle now*. Because tomorrow, tomorrow we will have invented the fix-it-all! Really, I swear! And if not? Well ... ah, we surely will. Or at least we might have. So all's well"
I'ts not about doing something tomorrow. It's all about doing nothing today.
"but wouldn't it be easier & quicker to re-terraform our own world?" - oh, c'mon buddy! It's much easier to magic at least 15000ppm [ EDIT: nope, it's 150,000 ppm, missed a zero there] O2 into existence on another planet - tomorrow, that is, than to remove 150ppm CO2 today! Surely everybody must see that at least?!
Sarcasm to be removed at the readers discretion.
@@qwertzundefinedapfel3830 Well said, that person! You summed up the nonsense perfectly there.
Didn't TF just suggest stratospheric aerosol injection, or something of that ilk?
A marvelous show of sai-ence - can’t wait for the second one.
In the words of Louis Rossman: "Informative, yet unfortunate"
What did you learn from this video? I'm also a fan of LR.
scary. i am from las vegas & remember standing on the Hoover Dam as a kid in 1995 or 1996 and seeing the reservoir was still full. I remember the marina that served the lake for decades where my uncle had a boat. I will be one of the last children to remember what the world was like before.
Hahahahahha stfu, the reason the reservoir is empty is because Jonathan greenbladt sold that water to dumb goyim at a 5000% mark up.
Be a bit more melodramatic will you. Every generation will be "One of the last children that remembers how the world was before"
Hasn't the hoover dam started to fill ?
Water didnt go anywhere. Earth is (almost) closed system in terms of water/air/minerals.
@@rjbiker66 A little, but as long as humans continue breeding, building, and laying irrigated golf courses in the desert, I wouldn't hold my breath about the trend continuing.
Yet there's only been 1.1° C temperature rise since the begining of the industrial age. How does this compare to the amount of energy from volcanic release, not just big explosions, its all of them.
10:25 I like the very brief "sounds of hell" jumpscare here, very good stuff
I appreciate your efforts and enjoy your videos. No one will listen In a world where fools are so sure of themselves, always. I'm old enough to remember when Carl Sagan sat before the congressional hearings on this matter, and it did indeed scare people. However, people only rose up later to yell in the idiocracy that my country has become, drowning out Sagan's- and any other cooler heads.
I finally watched Don’t Look Up last night. This is exactly what’s happening.
And I guess that, as a body, the 1985 congress was smarter than the current one.
many listen, a few wrreck it all for the rest of us.
When you realize that there is no carbon free energy production (thermodynamics and shite) what solution is there?
@@viermidebutura fewer kids
This is the thunderf00t we need, but not the thunderf00t we deserve
We've fallen asleep in the sun and when we finally wake up, we won't even be close to feeling the full extent of the burn.
Deep, man.
REAL DEEP...
This is the greatest explanation of global warming I have seen in a while. Most of them are playing on emotions and doomer-esque. And that just doesn't engage me and leaves me skeptical of their intentions. This more quantitative approach (even when only using very simple metaphors and explanations) is extremely engaging. Thank you.
i like the demonstrations, way too many tv/media clips tho
Yeah I think this is what the kids call “boomer editing” lmao I don’t normally mind it but it was like half the video
@@KoewlBag That's what I think every time he uploads, good vids but too long, too many useless bits. Lots of room to improve, but he seems to like it as it is.
I don't mind if he uses movie clips to express himself, but when it gets excessive it gets distracting.
There's a line in Melt With You that always hits hard:
Trapped in the state of imaginary grace
I made a pilgrimage to save this humans race
Never comprehending the race had long gone
Very intuitive explantaion with great visuals, good vid thanks.
But we understand that, we just don't understand how getting rid of cars and plastic straws are gonna change anything.
I learned it from my fav metal band when I was a kid . Nuclear Assault: Inherited Hell/Handle with Care: Look upon the world you knew
And say goodbye, it dies with you
Those who live when we are dead
Will curse our names, they 've inherited Hell
The forests are gone and the ocean destroyed
The world we once knew now is dead
The animals slaughtered, wild life in its grave
The sun burns too bright overhead
Cities collapsing and famine runs rampant
A nightmare where once there was life
Radiation and toxins a part of the children
Who will hate us until they die
That's some good lyrics too bad the song is so shooty, there's no way I'm hearing them (I did listen to it entirely)
More of a Megadeth guy myself
@@Jbrimbelibap I liked east coast trash, but my man, Megadeth is above all the other favs.
Sagan may have been off about the exact amount of warming but not the trajectory. One thing they didn't understand back then though was just how much the warmed atmosphere would suck moisture out of the lakes, rivers, and ground. These heat domes are sucking so much moisture out of the environment that they instantly become fire hazards over night.
For every heat dome that is created, some sort of torrential catastrophe follows later. We solved the hole in the O-zone somehow decades ago . . . we somehow collectively removed the majority of lead out of fuels and consumer products. We just couldn't pull together again a third time, to ensure our viability. Thus is our just rewards.
@@WhatWillYouFind That was the time before wide spread Internet and social media that has caused mis- and dis-information to spread like a wild fire. Back then conspiracy loonies were just some village idiots. Now they have large stages and extremely wide spread audience of like minded fools to listen to them.
@@WhatWillYouFind I somehow have to think of "The Man Who Fell to Earth" with David Bowie.
He came from a world where there was no water, and he was to find water on earth.
His family lived in some kind of train in a desert, in white, reflective fully covering bodysuits.
The rest is pretty psychedelic, but these people...
I hope you realize that this Thunderfoot's video is a huge collection of lies and misinformation: his graph trajectories which he presents are wildly dishonest and incorrect! He just plonked lines on graphs with their unit spacing pulled out of a hat to make money with your shock of how high the angle of that line is. In truth the angle of that line he drew is a lie, it has nothing to do with correct science.
He also started off with a blatant lie, claiming that peoples' heating, the temperature caused by that heating itself is causing global warming. Thunderfoot is a greedy opportunist trying to make money with this disinformation video just like so many other moral-less people and companies do on this platform and the other social medias.
Yeah that's definitely what's causing it, not the fact that you never do any forestry anymore. Not the fact that there are more trees now than ever before because you selfishly refuse to let them burn naturally like they're supposed to. It's those damn oil companies powering your homes so you don't die of heat stroke I say.
You people are absolute clowns.
There is a limit to how hot it will get as it will take 4x the amount of energy to make it hot enough to the point were its bad.
So what youre saying is we are fucked and we didnt go out with a bang but with a whimper? cool thats metal af
I wish this would go viral. I'm sick of conspiracy theorists having free rein over the internet. Logic and critical thinking are dying, replaced by clickbait and instant gratification. It's easier to believe there is an enemy out there... too easy and simple. It's hard to admit that our cushy lifestyle is what is contributing to that which will destroy us all. We are at fault.
I mean, there IS an ongoing conspiracy: but it's the fossil fuel industry conspiring to fool people into climate change denial, or any adjacent beliefs that conclude not to mess with the oil and gas industries.
Question: What was the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere when dinosaurs inhabited the planet? Ya know, about 70 Million or 100 Million years ago?
@@jeffw8218 learn what the term rate of change means you predictable clown. Plus the solar output was far lower 100 million years ago
@jeffw8218 WTF does that have to do with anything? You think you're gonna pull the ol "climate is always changing" meme? Gtfo
@@jeffw8218 hey, stop it, we only care about last 100 years ;)
Unfortunately most people in the world would rather die than admit they were wrong. They'd also let their children die than admit things change. Ignorance is lethal, but most people treat education like a betrayal of their beliefs. Until we can overcome the cult of ignorance, nothing will change.
"Until we can overcome the cult of ignorance, nothing will change."
I've been saying this for at least 30 years, the willfully ignorant are more then welcome to rid us of their stupidity any time now. Less work for us later.
There should be a clear distinction between the ignorant and the skeptical.
@rixille absolutely. But skepticism needs to be balanced with an understanding of the facts of a situation, whether they support or refute your ideas and beliefs. Too many skeptics succumb to confirmation bias, just like many conspiracy theorists do. If you aren't accepting all of the evidence, and find yourself only accepting what agrees with you, then you're not a skeptic. Skeptics have to accept that they can be wrong and that it is OK to change your mind when presented with new evidence, especially if it's not evidence that supports your ideas.
The best example of a true skeptic, to me, was the Amazing Randy. He was a former stage magician turned psychic skeptic. His goal was always to find a way to prove psychic abilities really existed. He went out of his for most of his life to expose frauds for faking psychic abilities and powers, not because he didn't want them to be real, but because if he could prove that it was not fake he'd have the proof suck powers were real. First and foremost, a skeptic has to question the proofs against his beliefs lest he fall prey to confirmation bias and support something that is untrue. If you are a UFO skeptic, you should thoroughly question all the evidence that supports and denies your belief I'm UFO equally.
@@Scudboy17 I know about James Randi, that's the type of skeptic I am referring to in fact. Everyone should pursue truth, but it's hard if that truth can turn their world upside down. There's also the matter of how people respond to truth, which is a whole other issue.
@rixille all too true. But pursuing truth, no matter where it takes you, is a noble goal in and of itself. Most people won't accept hard truths when soft lies are so much easier to believe, even when they know it's a lie.
For me it already happened when i was a kid in my backyard i could do skiing and snowboarding today ~20 years later we barely had any snow at all with one small exception where we had -16°C
I'm perhaps a little older and remember weeks of snow whilst growing up in UK winters of the '60s and 70's when I would go sledging.
In 2022 it snowed in late november AUSTRALIA SPRING @@thedubwhisperer2157
Imagin a World were Winter would be 9 months and as could as you can Imagin.
Its a good thing we life in a warm period....
Are we even able to stop climate change anymore? I mean, we maybe should start looking into things that will make it easier for us to adapt to climate change in the future and help us prevent issues in the future.
wow what a wholesome and entertaining video, totally not going to kill myself hahaha
That will only exacerbate the problem… you’ll only rot and turn into more CO2.
you have people who love you. stay safe.
If "science" causes you to have suicidal thoughts, you didn't encounter science. You encountered propaganda.
This comment is 100% proof of how destructive and dangerous Thunderfoot's blatant misinformation is!
@@1pierrrSure but you wouldn't be burning more fuel to run your body. Really the best thing you can probably do for climate change is kill as many people as you can and then yourself. I'm not suggesting you do that but it is unlikely that we are going to have such a big impact on co2 levels that it would out pace our co2 footprint.
Humans are remarkably adaptable, we have managed to survive and thrive everywhere on this earth, from sahara to Siberia without any modern tech. Now, with modern tech, humanity isn't going anywhere.
Of course we are going all sorts of places. The moon. Mars. Not because of climate change or anything. Just to explore.
@@donaldhobson8873 If that's sarcasm, it's one hell of a stupid sarcasm. Even if Earth's average temperature rises by 10°, it will still be 100x more habitable than the moon or Mars.
@@n3gi_ I know climate change won't make the earth less livable than mars. Most people will probably stay on earth for the near future. But building cities on mars sounds like the sort of thing a prosperous high tech humanity might do.
Look, I've seen futurama, we just go to pluto, get a big ice cube, and drop it in the ocean. Ez.
Thanks for making this video.
People try to be optimistic, but humanity is kinda doomed. We know what our great filter is and we're walking right into it...
And as stated in the video, nothing will be done about it because the people who stand to gain from ignoring it will never face consequences for doing so.
As a French citizen, I think I have an inkling to what the solution might be, and I regret to inform you that as people with a device connected to the internet, on the global scale we're probably on the wrong side of that solution.
Theres nothing that can damage humanity itself. The question at hand in terms of life only impacts the poor. Which is why we wont do anything about it. The people whom stand to gain are all the westerners.
Ah not the only kind, demographic transitional model says developed populations will die.
Hey, there is another kinda inevitable great filter for us. Think of Murphy's law - what can go wrong will go wrong (it's just a matter of time) - and combine that with our nuclear arsenal and the logic of mutually assured destruction. Can that system go wrong? Absolutely. Will it? Murphy says it's just a matter of time so there we go. But don't worry, the country with the largest nuclear arsenal - Russia - only threatened several dozen times with nukes the past two years.
@@thulyblu5486i wouldn't trust the russian nukes to work much better than.. well, all the other russian tech. If they launched half those nukes they'd probably just malfunction over russian airspace if they manage to detonate at all
21:30 godys lab had also this problem on one of his??? Lands, the trees in lower artitude were infected with bugs but the higher attitude trees were fine
Thank you for your effort
There's some recent research suggesting that AMOC will fail catastrophically within decades.
If that happens consequences will be swift.
I knew Elon would make his way into this lesson somehow.
You: My Prius is still contributing too much for global warming, shame on me. I will eat sunlight instead.
Elon: Modafaka rockit goes BRRRR, I want 41000 satellites, and Mars base.
@@Daikini0Thunderfoot: Elon bad, Elon Bad, Elon Bad. Yeah we get it we just don't want to hear about it every single video. The man is obsessed more than most musk fans. You've heard of TDS he's got MDS
Been watching you since the old Venomfangx stuff. This is probably the most depressed I've felt after one of your videos. Thanks for that.
My bet on what will be the answer to what happened in the 1950s is... SO2
I, for one, welcome the return of the climate to what it was during the carboniferous.