The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
This is by far, the most extensive researched video I have ever seen on Mainland South East Asia. There are a few minor errors of course, but for the most part it is well made. Bravo from Cambodia
The Pearic in northern western Cambodia is correct though. They had their own chiefdom/kingdom before the Jayavarman II conquest. Chinese records from 600 AD talked about a Kingdom which is south of Battambang. There is another kingdom as well which is not mentioned in the map which is Sri Canasa which is in present day Ayutthaya. That kingdom is more of a buffer kingdom in Dvaravati area but based on researchers research the kingdom is Buddhist but accepted Hinduism and relied on slaves and trade and had more Khmer influence.
Thank you for writing our countries which used to exist in the past and historical names in Vietnamese language. This is the first time I've seen Vietnamese names on a foreigner ' s video .
@@Jolly_812 đó là tên quốc tế. Ngta đặt dựa trên vị trí của nó so với nước lớn nhất ở đấy tức Trung Quốc. Cũng giống như việc nhiều người gọi bán đảo Đông Dương là Indo-China vậy
For the people who asking why Malay Peninsula were not included in this video. My reasoning is simple, if he put the Malay Peninsula meaning he aslo need to put the rest of Maritime Southeast Asia because how the area were shaped. Which aslo meaning that it gonna take even longer research to make this video. I didnt want to argue about technicallity here because he intentionally cut it of to reduce his workload. This video had already taken so much time, just give this channel a break.
Yeah, there's a load of things also going on the seas, with Srivijaya vs Majapahit and whatnot also flexing their supremacy, and how much of info is needed to load all states in it. Only Kedah/Patani/Terengganu I think has a constant contact with the kingdom up above, and mostly with Siam kingdoms.
@@first761 Technically Kelantan exist as different smaller kingdoms and localities back then. Modern Kelantan however, is a breakaway state from Terengganu in the 19th century.
Nice stuff! The confusing thing I found however is that according to Wyatt's "Thailand: A Short History (2nd Edition)" there are no records of Tai people in Southeast Asia until after the first millennium (or something along those lines). Also, I believed that Pegu was a vassal of Sukhothai for a few years, also according to Wyatt (and present on a few other map videos like Thames Mapping's: ruclips.net/video/SGZqX6UVao0/видео.html). I think Lan Na should have had its own box in the legend at least until Mangrai's death or its decline in the 16th century right prior to becoming a Burmese vassal. Also, another significant thing I found is that well into the first millennium or early second millennium, the water level around the Gulf of Thailand was higher than it is today (that might have been said in Chris Baker and Pasuk Phongpaichit's "A History of Thailand (3rd Edition)" or "A History of Ayutthaya: Siam in the Early Modern World", I don't recall). For the different language families, I think you should've color coded them somehow (in my opinion would be color-coding the text). I felt it was kind of weird that you didn't include the Burmese insurgent groups either. Great job nonetheless and didn't mind the delay due to the pain-staking detail it must have been to make this video from start to end.
Tai people did not move into Southeast Asia from China (today's Guangxi region to be exact) until the medieval times (roughly during China's Song dynasty I believe). This map here shows not just mainland Southeast Asia but also Southern China, since peoples of these two regions have deep historical connections
Insurgents groups in Myanmar is negligible, they haven’t won any battles so thus, they have no claim to any of the lands, most of them do not even station inside Myanmar, instead, they hide in Thailand, China or India
@@thunsitam7662 Did you use the word steal? The use of words seems very pathetic. In the old days, whoever lost a battle was considered a loser. Only the victors survive. The ancestors of the Khmer people lost to the Thai people and were unable to restore their independence. before being divided by the French to rule It's reasonable that your space will be left here.
This was such a great video, until we got to the Qing Conquest of Ming, and it's shown stupendously inaccurately! Still, I can tell a lot of work went into this. It's a masterpiece. But agh, seeing southwestern Guangdong controlled by Ming in 1661 is just aggravating. On the other hand, the Warlord Era is portrayed almost perfectly! Only that you forgot that Qinzhou was part of Guangdong before 1950, and that Sichuan and Guizhou recognised the Nanjing government in 1927.
Stop flexing on him 😂 I mean you could be right and probably are knowing your channel but still XD. He did do a great job. Can't wait to see something from you!👍
This was really great, could have been a bit more detailed for the late 20th and 21st centuries but the amazing detail in the previous centuries makes up for it.
Austroasiatic and Austronesian both have the and infixes (as well as the prefix etc.). The presence of infixes of identical form and similar semantics was one of the main arguments for the Austric hypothesis. In fact, I know of Filipinos who can understand words in Khmer with these affixes if they know the root words' meaning. Such a feature seems to be indicative of a common ancestor rather than borrowing especially for the infixes which are rare in linguistics.
commenting to help the algorithm, very detailed and a lot of research is done to this video. would appreciate if you also make the Maritime South East Asia Version. keep up the Quality~!
Hi, Dragon! I love your videos and work, so I wish that you make a video about History of Mesopotamia from Stone age to today. I know that will be the best video ever.
Thank you very much for this exeptionally well made video. It must have been a really big amount of work you have put into the research and production of this. I very much appriciate your work. I am so amazed by this.
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
Fascinating the mosaic of peoples/cultures early in history that inhabited that part of the world and how the boundaries and groups evolved, I wish to know more as I know too little of this subject, great work! 👍👍
Just discovered this masterpiece, this is the most detailed map history about this region i have ever seen. As a vietnamese, i can see you spent a lot of effort to research about my country, the accuracy is just amazing. Nice job dude
Please do a video on Malay Archipelago (Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Timor-Leste) next time. Thank you so much for showcasing our beloved region ASEAN.
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
As a south east asian, I really appreciate this video! I really do respect that you put so much efforts to these kinds of videos. This one have tons of details that most historical map content missed out. Keep it up man! Love your contents!
if china is shown too, wouldve been nice to show northeast india as well, since some kingdoms there are also somewhat like those in mainland southeast asia
Especially since Ahom Kingdom were Thai speaking, and nagas were shown. Would have been nice to see Mizoram, Manipur, Nagalim, Tripura, Assam, etc. Also, seeing Burmese Civil War lines, like the Wa state would have been cool.
Yeah, that part of India has a shared culture with parts of Southeast Asia especially Myanmar. They have Austroasiatics and Tibeto-Burman speaking people.
@@JcDizon Not only that part. There are Many Vedic influences throughout Southeast Asia which range from Language to names of places and religious idea's as well. Even many festivals.
no offense, i still don't understand why all northeast india became part of india not myanmar, or independent states, after the british left. how did the british draw the lines back then. why some tiny parts like bhutan and, well, back then, sikkim, could be their own.
Thank you admin for doing research about this . I guess that it would take a huge a mount of time to reading book, research , and editing to make this type of video. Very detailed compare to same style history map videos i've seen on RUclips.
Very good video although the map of Vietnam in some periods is not very accurate, for example central and south Vietnam under the Nguyễn dynasty is still not very accurate so please fix the errors related to the map in the next videos, thank you for making good quality videos.
How long did it take you to complete this project? What software did you use to create the dynamic map? 감사합니다 (I lived in Korea for 8 years in Jeollabuk do, noticed some different dialects in Jeolla vs Gyeonggi )
At 1:18 shows the Austroasiatic homeland being placed in Southern China, but that has always been a fringe theory in linguistics. The main theory today is that the Austroasiatc Urheimat lies somewhere near northern India, followed by the other most probable candidate, Indochina ("Mainland Southeast Asia"), since this is where the most genetic diversity is found. The theory that Austroasiatic originated and dominated most of Southern China is largely obsolete and not supported by recent evidence. For the Baiyue whom you labelled "Austroasiatic," current linguistics point to a Kra-Dai relationship, suggesting that the Wu and Yue natives most likely spoke an ancestral language to Kra-Dai or, perhaps, a sister branch next to Kra-Dai that had become extinct. Prior to the Kra-Dai expansion in Southern China, it's believed that they may have begun as an off-branch migration from the Pre-Proto-Austronesians, where one branch went to Taiwan and the rest of Maritime Southeast Asia, forming the Austronesian language family. Here, a second branch most probably left Taiwan and (re)migrated back to Deep Southern China, forming the basis for Kra-Dai.
@@Urlocallordandsavior Look up Austroasiatic language and history by Roger Blench and The Handbook of the Austroasiatic Languages by Paul Sidwell & Mathias Jenny. The map shown in the video here is a fringe theory that contradicts what academics widely teach in universities today. I minored in linguistics at UBC, graduating in 2018.
@@夜行者-s2x They used to live in India, then migrated to Southeast Asia and migrated back to East Asia. And were pushed back to Southeast Asia by the Han people.
This is extremely cool. However I'd like to know what source you use for the expansion of the Tai peoples into the region. From what I understand the Mon controlled city states all along the Mekong and Khorat Plateau until conquest by the Khmer Empire. I don't think that the Tai arrived until rather later, 900s or so. This seems to put them in Khorat very early. Regardless fantastic work.
great video but the French had never conquored Đà Nẳng. the reason why France Invaded Cochinchina was because they failed to capture Đà Nẳng. just a minor detail but still hope you notice my respond.
Damn I'm so proud of myself that I managed to predict most of the major events before they happened. I've never thought of myself as being very good at SEA history, and I'm obviously much better at the history of other regions, but it's still really nice.
From wiki "The key drivers of the Indianisation of Southeast Asia were the Austronesian[4][5] and Indian maritime trade especially the Spice trade and the Maritime Silk Road, the emissaries of Ashoka, and the Buddhist missions of Emperor Ashoka the Great."
Siam, the old name of Thailand, was used officially from 1856, during the reign of King Mongkut, Rama IV of the Rattanakosin era, to 1939, when the country's name was changed to Thailand for the first time in the post-revolutionary era under the leadership of nationalist Prime Minister Luang Pibulsonggram, who was also the war-time prime minister. After the end of World War II in 1945, the country's name in English and other foreign languages reverted back to Siam until 1949 when Pibul, who was back in power after staging a military coup, renamed the country again to Thailand, the present name of the country.
Haha, I checked out his presentation on Austroasiatic migrations from earlier this year and tried to represent his research in this video. Hopefully it turned out ok 🙏🏻
@@TheDragonHistorian archaeogenetics confirmed that Austroasiatic O1b1 had already migrated to Southeast Asia mainland, part of marine and the Philippines 9,200 years ago. The Hoabinhians also contained Austroasiatic Halogroups. Around the Dong Son period, the Red River Delta burial remains were mixed between Austroasiatic and Kra-Dai/Austronesian O1a1 , might be the legendary King An Duong and the Ouyue tribes who partly integrated themselves with local Austroasiatic elites. Archaeogenetics >>> linguistic
I find that the place of origin of Austroasiatic peoples was changed to Pearl river basin(that could be related to Baiyue...?) instead of Yangtze river possibly due to previous comments by Dr. Sidwell😅
Though I am not sure if we were a Chinese, Vietnamese,etc, but really, this map has helped me a lot to understand how our ancestors have migrated. Thank you very much for the video from North East India, Mizoram. 😑😑👍. Nah, it's a pain, I really wish to know who were our ancestors. We called ourselves Zo people.
@@cynki5152 One of my friend has tested his DNA and see that he had Central Asia, Finnish, Inuit, Nepali 2%, Vietnamese and Han Chinese 87%. But the thing I want to know is Chhinlung. Chhinlung is a place where our ancestors have come from.
@@ruatapachuauruatapachuau9116 The Chinese genes are inherently heterogeneous because in the past China invaded other countries and merged them. North and South China have very different appearances. Southern China today (southern of the Yangtze River) belongs to the land of Baiyue. Most likely your ancestors came from there, then migrated gradually. The same ancestors land of Vietnamese people (as me) and Thailand
Linguistically speaking, your people is Sino-Tibetan. I've seen pictures of Sino-Tibetan peoples of Northeast India and they look very much a like to the Chinese, many of them look like Yellow River region Chinese, not even the Southern Chinese who are mixed with Hmong, Yue and other tribes.
Muang Sua was founded by the Mon people as well as That Phanom on the west Bank of the Mekong just north of Savannakhet, Sri Gotapura near Nakhom Phanom and Chantaburi near Vientiane.
Who were the Hoabinhians? Were they an early Austroasiatic group? It says on Wikipedia that human remains from Laos and Malaysia that belonged in the Hoabinhian culture resembles some Orang Asli tribes from peninsular Malaysia (I guess the Senoi) and the Nicobarese and also shows relations with Khmer people.
Continuing on my previous comments, just read this new paper and it seems that by some metrics, Cantonese are more Austronesian-shifted than some Filipino groups if I'm reading it correctly. That's wild and how'd that even happen? There's something it called the "Southern Chinese Cluster" consisting of Austronesians, Kra-Dai, Hmong-mien, and Southern Han Chinese. From "Genomic Insights Into the Demographic History of the Southern Chinese" the published version. It also said that Austronesians are as genetically close to Hmong-miens as they are to Kra-Dai. These groups have the most prevalence of the MC1R gene which can be seen in their lips, nippls, hair, etc. (Neanderthal Origin ... MC1R in Modern Humans by Qiliang Ding et al. Fig. 3). If you look closely at their hair these groups have a red tone as compared to the straight black of other Asians, red facial hairs though sparse, blondism, etc.
Austroasiatics are not the main Baiyue at all, not in the least. Any genomics paper on southern China can tell you the lineages. Vietnamese are the exception, not the rule, and are actually mostly a Kra-Dai lineage with some Han Chinese, Hmong-mien, and Austronesian that shifted to speaking the Vietnamese language. They do retain their Austroasiatic lineage strongly in their blood but it's not their main lineage anymore. Austroasiatics (except for Vietnamese) do not share the southern Chinese lineage as much as the other groups I mentioned.
Also, '... While no conclusive study to determine whether Funan's ethnolinguistic components were Austronesian or Austroasiatic, there is dispute among scholars. According to the majority of Vietnamese academics, for example, Mac Duong, stipulates that "Funan's core population certainly were the Austronesians, not Khmer;" ...' Etc.
@@Nohatedont ah, are you his second channel? I’m asking cuz like, I’ve seen these stuff and make maps before but never on this level of detail. This is quite obscure at the very least and require professional informational access at most. Usually books and websites have some info but the history of zomia is quite difficult to track, only modern distribution. I also just wanna ask the creator as well in case I could ask him for some info I couldn’t find.
@@first761 Culturally and historically, it's more in line with maritime Southeast Asia (it was controlled by two empires based in Indonesia after all). Same thing with Vietnam (culturally very Sinitic-influenced but its location makes it in SE Asia). Southeast Asia's a large and diverse region, you have to split it accordingly somehow (ideally a mix of shared cultures/histories/location).
Hi Dragon love your videos they are amazing. How about you do Lisbon for a video it would be great if you could, thanks and continue the great work that you do.
Doesn't surprise me that Northern Vietnam where Hà noi now sits, developed early civilizationally. It's flat, low-level, humid, and warm and therefore very fertile. Easy to get a large population going.
ขอบคุณจากประเทศไทย นี้เป็นวิดิโอที่ดีที่สุด งานวิจัยด้าน DNA คนไทยส่วนใหญ่มี DNA -Mons นี้คือสิ่งที่ถูกต้องที่สุดแต่เคยดูมา ตรงกับหลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์
The whole SEA area is one of the areas on Earth that I know little about! I know more about Africa and the Pacific Islands than I know about SEA. Thank you so much for making this video!
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
I would point out that Baiyue were renowned for their sailing ability and Austroasiatics really seem to not have taken too well to life on the coasts and seas for whatever reason with Vietnamese as the rare exception. I think one of the more interesting findings of modern science regarding this is that those in Lingnan (Guangdong, Guangxi, N. Vietnam) were actually originally genetically Kra-Dais and Austronesians that underwent language shifts to Vietnamese, Cantonese, etc. For example, Cantonese like many other southern Han languages exhibit a significant Kra-Dai substratum. Any genomics papers on southern China can substantiate this. Nonetheless, there's something not necessarily in the languages of these groups, but moreso in their culture, knowledge and biological DNA that allowed them to thrive and prosper on the coasts and seas. Even Cambodians have some type of major genetic Austronesian-Tai lineage that exceeds their Austroasiatic one though marginally, which isn't seen (for example in f3 outgroup statistics) in the "pure" Austroasiatics that are more inland such as Htin Mal, etc. And even Funan (a precursor to Angkor Wat) may quite likely also have been an Austronesian kingdom.
Inaccurate. Vieto-Katuic were much older than the semi legend Au Lac kingdom, roughly the same time of the Hoabinhians. And they lived side by side with Tai and Hlai speaking peoples, as archaeogenetics confirmed.
you are the best in the world?,they take the data of the world's knowledge,you still deny it? are you smarter than the person who made this video? who do you think You Are? 🤣🤣
The area of Dong Hung, Thuong Tu, Phong Thanh and the present-day Giang Binh-Bach Long area used to belong to Vietnam for a long time until the 19th century, because in the process of dominating Vietnam, the French made some mistakes. mistake and signed with the Qing Dynasty the Franco-Qing Treaty of 1887, resulting in the above regions falling into Chinese hands. Dongxing was formed at the end of the Ming Dynasty, flourished during the Qing Dynasty, with over 400 years of history. Tay, Zhuang, Nung, and H'mong ethnic groups live
Vietnam is a Southeast Asian country, but it feels similar to the history of Northeast Asia in that it achieved centralization quickly, is a Confucian culture, and has constantly fought with China.
Alexander Woodside: Vietnam only became quite "Confucianized" during the reign of Gia Long and Minh Menh during the first half of 19th century, by enforcement of East Asian Sinic elitist traditions over Vietnamese peasantry, whom Southeast Asian naturally. Result: 500 rebellions
Many people didn’t notice but I did, you cared about Old and Middle Chinese pronunciation of dynasties’ names
Very Impressive!!!❤️❤️❤️
Truly great video. The combination of accuracy, detail and an aesthetically pleasing design is heavenly.
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
Vietnam: Chinese rulers have come, Chinese rulers have gone, Chinese rulers have come again, Chinese rulers have gone again...
true
😝😝We invited them to leave, and they obediently left,😝
the uninvited have gone 4 times
true
Chinese rulers will come again 😃 Vietnam belongs to Trung Quoc
This is by far, the most extensive researched video I have ever seen on Mainland South East Asia. There are a few minor errors of course, but for the most part it is well made. Bravo from Cambodia
The Pearic in northern western Cambodia is correct though. They had their own chiefdom/kingdom before the Jayavarman II conquest. Chinese records from 600 AD talked about a Kingdom which is south of Battambang. There is another kingdom as well which is not mentioned in the map which is Sri Canasa which is in present day Ayutthaya. That kingdom is more of a buffer kingdom in Dvaravati area but based on researchers research the kingdom is Buddhist but accepted Hinduism and relied on slaves and trade and had more Khmer influence.
Stop being beggar please.
@@suwatnisapai8211bruh chill tf out
@@tonythvch3500 bruh chill tf out
@@suwatnisapai8211don’t Thai to the world.
Thank you for writing our countries which used to exist in the past and historical names in Vietnamese language. This is the first time I've seen Vietnamese names on a foreigner ' s video .
Nhưng mình vẫn đang thắc mắc về cái cụm từ " South China Sea " ( Biển đông Trung Quốc ) sát rõ rành rành trên biển Đông tức là thế nào nhỉ 🙂?
@@Jolly_812 đó là tên quốc tế. Ngta đặt dựa trên vị trí của nó so với nước lớn nhất ở đấy tức Trung Quốc. Cũng giống như việc nhiều người gọi bán đảo Đông Dương là Indo-China vậy
@@hai965 Ohhhhhhh
I have just seen Khmere on earth, before just found Khmir who was Khom's slave so Khmir was Khmere, who was in Khom's empire?
For the people who asking why Malay Peninsula were not included in this video. My reasoning is simple, if he put the Malay Peninsula meaning he aslo need to put the rest of Maritime Southeast Asia because how the area were shaped. Which aslo meaning that it gonna take even longer research to make this video. I didnt want to argue about technicallity here because he intentionally cut it of to reduce his workload.
This video had already taken so much time, just give this channel a break.
Where is southern Thailand
@@VeryCringe10 south Thailand is Malay Peninsula
Yeah, there's a load of things also going on the seas, with Srivijaya vs Majapahit and whatnot also flexing their supremacy, and how much of info is needed to load all states in it.
Only Kedah/Patani/Terengganu I think has a constant contact with the kingdom up above, and mostly with Siam kingdoms.
@@ejenn-syahmixcel1730 dont forget kelantan
@@first761 Technically Kelantan exist as different smaller kingdoms and localities back then. Modern Kelantan however, is a breakaway state from Terengganu in the 19th century.
Nice stuff! The confusing thing I found however is that according to Wyatt's "Thailand: A Short History (2nd Edition)" there are no records of Tai people in Southeast Asia until after the first millennium (or something along those lines). Also, I believed that Pegu was a vassal of Sukhothai for a few years, also according to Wyatt (and present on a few other map videos like Thames Mapping's: ruclips.net/video/SGZqX6UVao0/видео.html). I think Lan Na should have had its own box in the legend at least until Mangrai's death or its decline in the 16th century right prior to becoming a Burmese vassal. Also, another significant thing I found is that well into the first millennium or early second millennium, the water level around the Gulf of Thailand was higher than it is today (that might have been said in Chris Baker and Pasuk Phongpaichit's "A History of Thailand (3rd Edition)" or "A History of Ayutthaya: Siam in the Early Modern World", I don't recall).
For the different language families, I think you should've color coded them somehow (in my opinion would be color-coding the text). I felt it was kind of weird that you didn't include the Burmese insurgent groups either. Great job nonetheless and didn't mind the delay due to the pain-staking detail it must have been to make this video from start to end.
Tai people did not move into Southeast Asia from China (today's Guangxi region to be exact) until the medieval times (roughly during China's Song dynasty I believe). This map here shows not just mainland Southeast Asia but also Southern China, since peoples of these two regions have deep historical connections
@@larshofler8298 Didn’t I say that above?
@@Urlocallordandsavior At fi time sokhothai was a province of Khmer empire but Your ancestors stole it from us
Insurgents groups in Myanmar is negligible, they haven’t won any battles so thus, they have no claim to any of the lands, most of them do not even station inside Myanmar, instead, they hide in Thailand, China or India
@@thunsitam7662 Did you use the word steal? The use of words seems very pathetic. In the old days, whoever lost a battle was considered a loser. Only the victors survive. The ancestors of the Khmer people lost to the Thai people and were unable to restore their independence. before being divided by the French to rule It's reasonable that your space will be left here.
This was such a great video, until we got to the Qing Conquest of Ming, and it's shown stupendously inaccurately! Still, I can tell a lot of work went into this. It's a masterpiece. But agh, seeing southwestern Guangdong controlled by Ming in 1661 is just aggravating. On the other hand, the Warlord Era is portrayed almost perfectly! Only that you forgot that Qinzhou was part of Guangdong before 1950, and that Sichuan and Guizhou recognised the Nanjing government in 1927.
Stop flexing on him 😂
I mean you could be right and probably are knowing your channel but still XD.
He did do a great job.
Can't wait to see something from you!👍
please, when is your overdue new video? eagerly waiting...
专业的来了😂
@@风谣-s8d I dont speak corona
@@stoggafllik sssh diamlah, tiada seorang yang ajak engkau cakap
This was really great, could have been a bit more detailed for the late 20th and 21st centuries but the amazing detail in the previous centuries makes up for it.
Most of it is kept as a secret.
@@DinoMan_6 I wouldn't say that at all.
How was it not detailed in the late 20th and 21st centuries?
@@worldpoint3279 modern Cambodia and Myanmar are completely neglected
@@YeastCartography I don't see how. They seem to be as detailed as every other modern country.
I'm really impressed by this.Great job as always.
They put Mad A Low face there.
Begged for railway pillow?
Wow! As a malayan-Austro asiatic Filipino it's very heartwarming to see the history of my neighborhood nations!😍♥️👏🙏🇵🇭♥️🇲🇲🇹🇭🇻🇳🇱🇦🇰🇭
This dude literally forgot the biggest country in South East Asia by territory, Indonesia
@@worlds3061 Indonesia isn't mainland SEA, didn't u read the title? 🙄
Don't you mean Austronesian? Filipinos unlike most other Southeast Asian seems to have very little to do with Austroasiatics.
@@JcDizon filipino is pure of austronesian, and malay and indo is half austronesian half austroasiatic
@@first761 bruh, the Spaniards kinda did a little colonization and now we're still unsure if we are Oceanic or Asian.
Austroasiatic and Austronesian both have the and infixes (as well as the prefix etc.). The presence of infixes of identical form and similar semantics was one of the main arguments for the Austric hypothesis. In fact, I know of Filipinos who can understand words in Khmer with these affixes if they know the root words' meaning. Such a feature seems to be indicative of a common ancestor rather than borrowing especially for the infixes which are rare in linguistics.
I see how much efforts had been put for the details.
What?
@@ih8people48 Sorry, I'm not good at English grammar.
This video was so Epic💥💥, Thanks Bro! From 🇹🇭
commenting to help the algorithm, very detailed and a lot of research is done to this video. would appreciate if you also make the Maritime South East Asia Version. keep up the Quality~!
Hi, Dragon!
I love your videos and work, so I wish that you make a video about History of Mesopotamia from Stone age to today. I know that will be the best video ever.
Persia, Babylon, Assyria, Akkad
@@라모스-r2d Sumer also
this was VERY well done, younare very underrated
Suggestion: history of south asia next perhaps?
One clip takes about 3-4 hours to watch. Very good. Thank you very much.
Thank you very much for this exeptionally well made video. It must have been a really big amount of work you have put into the research and production of this. I very much appriciate your work. I am so amazed by this.
Very impressive.
So much research have been done for this video.
Great video.
Thank you.
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
Thank’y, Dragon, for this lovely video!
Fascinating the mosaic of peoples/cultures early in history that inhabited that part of the world and how the boundaries and groups evolved, I wish to know more as I know too little of this subject, great work! 👍👍
Just discovered this masterpiece, this is the most detailed map history about this region i have ever seen. As a vietnamese, i can see you spent a lot of effort to research about my country, the accuracy is just amazing. Nice job dude
All of academia will greatly benefit from this video. Especially me. Thank you for your contribution in preserving History.
Please do a video on Malay Archipelago (Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Timor-Leste) next time. Thank you so much for showcasing our beloved region ASEAN.
SO WORTH THE WAIT! Amazing job 👋👋👋
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
5년전 부터 보고있었는데 점점 갈수록 디테일해지네ㄷ
As a south east asian, I really appreciate this video!
I really do respect that you put so much efforts to these kinds of videos. This one have tons of details that most historical map content missed out.
Keep it up man!
Love your contents!
Laos in the early 700s was like Holy Roman Empire
great video...incredible quality....amazed!
if china is shown too, wouldve been nice to show northeast india as well, since some kingdoms there are also somewhat like those in mainland southeast asia
Especially since Ahom Kingdom were Thai speaking, and nagas were shown. Would have been nice to see Mizoram, Manipur, Nagalim, Tripura, Assam, etc. Also, seeing Burmese Civil War lines, like the Wa state would have been cool.
Yeah, that part of India has a shared culture with parts of Southeast Asia especially Myanmar. They have Austroasiatics and Tibeto-Burman speaking people.
Maybe northeast india and maybe yunnan too could've been part of southeast asia too if they were not part of india or china
@@JcDizon Not only that part. There are Many Vedic influences throughout Southeast Asia which range from Language to names of places and religious idea's as well.
Even many festivals.
no offense, i still don't understand why all northeast india became part of india not myanmar, or independent states, after the british left. how did the british draw the lines back then. why some tiny parts like bhutan and, well, back then, sikkim, could be their own.
Thank you for diligent research and an excellent video.
Thank you!!! Now please do the history of Maritime SEA. Austronesians will now be the big players here ✨
There are 400 million Austronesian speakers. Among Austronesian, Indo-Malay language has the most speakers at 290 million (350 million by 2050)
Thank you admin for doing research about this . I guess that it would take a huge a mount of time to reading book, research , and editing to make this type of video. Very detailed compare to same style history map videos i've seen on RUclips.
Very good video although the map of Vietnam in some periods is not very accurate, for example central and south Vietnam under the Nguyễn dynasty is still not very accurate so please fix the errors related to the map in the next videos, thank you for making good quality videos.
Appreciate the effort making this video. Nice!
Great job! As a western interested in South east asian history, this is very useful and detailed, thanks!
this is ✨masterpiece✨great job
How long did it take you to complete this project? What software did you use to create the dynamic map? 감사합니다 (I lived in Korea for 8 years in Jeollabuk do, noticed some different dialects in Jeolla vs Gyeonggi )
Thanks! I started working on this last summer, so I think it took 6-7 months to complete.
전라남도랑 전라북도의 차이가 더 커요
So much work and although there are mistakes, that is to be expected with a project so grand in scale. Commenting to help the algorithm
"The storm is a good opportunity for the pine and the cypress to show their strength and their stability"
- Ho Chi Minh
This is absolutely incredible
At 1:18 shows the Austroasiatic homeland being placed in Southern China, but that has always been a fringe theory in linguistics. The main theory today is that the Austroasiatc Urheimat lies somewhere near northern India, followed by the other most probable candidate, Indochina ("Mainland Southeast Asia"), since this is where the most genetic diversity is found. The theory that Austroasiatic originated and dominated most of Southern China is largely obsolete and not supported by recent evidence. For the Baiyue whom you labelled "Austroasiatic," current linguistics point to a Kra-Dai relationship, suggesting that the Wu and Yue natives most likely spoke an ancestral language to Kra-Dai or, perhaps, a sister branch next to Kra-Dai that had become extinct. Prior to the Kra-Dai expansion in Southern China, it's believed that they may have begun as an off-branch migration from the Pre-Proto-Austronesians, where one branch went to Taiwan and the rest of Maritime Southeast Asia, forming the Austronesian language family. Here, a second branch most probably left Taiwan and (re)migrated back to Deep Southern China, forming the basis for Kra-Dai.
You are right
Original Austra Asiatic people are proto East Asian farmers from Southwest China or Northeast India，not South China
Sources?
@@Urlocallordandsavior Look up Austroasiatic language and history by Roger Blench and The Handbook of the Austroasiatic Languages by Paul Sidwell & Mathias Jenny. The map shown in the video here is a fringe theory that contradicts what academics widely teach in universities today. I minored in linguistics at UBC, graduating in 2018.
@@Urlocallordandsavior The one who reads a thousand books will understand without mentioning the origin.
@@夜行者-s2x They used to live in India, then migrated to Southeast Asia and migrated back to East Asia. And were pushed back to Southeast Asia by the Han people.
This is extremely cool. However I'd like to know what source you use for the expansion of the Tai peoples into the region. From what I understand the Mon controlled city states all along the Mekong and Khorat Plateau until conquest by the Khmer Empire. I don't think that the Tai arrived until rather later, 900s or so. This seems to put them in Khorat very early. Regardless fantastic work.
I love how Lopburi artillery center was found in 1000BC
great video but the French had never conquored Đà Nẳng. the reason why France Invaded Cochinchina was because they failed to capture Đà Nẳng. just a minor detail but still hope you notice my respond.
어떻게 이렇게 정확하시지 매번 볼 때마다 신기
dumamay
정말 기다렸습니다!! 항상 힘내시고 이런영상을 만들기위해 사용하는 프로그램은 무엇인가요?
응원해주셔서 감사합니다. 지도 자체는 포토샵으로, 영상은 Premiere Pro로 작업하고 있습니다.
@@TheDragonHistorian 답변해주셔서 감사합니다!!
Damn I'm so proud of myself that I managed to predict most of the major events before they happened. I've never thought of myself as being very good at SEA history, and I'm obviously much better at the history of other regions, but it's still really nice.
Cant even begun to imagin the amout of work here , kudos to you bro i hope a similare video about north africa
Actually ,
you should have included the northeast part of India too.
We have same culture as others southeast asian countries.
Ahom Kingdom FTW! Insert other polities below me.
But Northeast India is not part of Southeast Asia
@@Dream-kv9wj Dude if you are here then you can see the similarity...
By northeast I excluded Assam and others..only bordering the country of Myanmar.
ผสมอินเดียเยอะเกินไป
Yes Burma used to rule Manipur and Assam in the past
From wiki "The key drivers of the Indianisation of Southeast Asia were the Austronesian[4][5] and Indian maritime trade especially the Spice trade and the Maritime Silk Road, the emissaries of Ashoka, and the Buddhist missions of Emperor Ashoka the Great."
Siam, the old name of Thailand, was used officially from 1856, during the reign of King Mongkut, Rama IV of the Rattanakosin era, to 1939, when the country's name was changed to Thailand for the first time in the post-revolutionary era under the leadership of nationalist Prime Minister Luang Pibulsonggram, who was also the war-time prime minister. After the end of World War II in 1945, the country's name in English and other foreign languages reverted back to Siam until 1949 when Pibul, who was back in power after staging a military coup, renamed the country again to Thailand, the present name of the country.
You're pretty detail as history actually. That's nice to see someone did a timeline video.
This is going to be epic. You know that Paul Sidwell is going to be watching and he'll grade you an F for inaccuracies. The pressure is on.
Haha, I checked out his presentation on Austroasiatic migrations from earlier this year and tried to represent his research in this video. Hopefully it turned out ok 🙏🏻
Who's Paul Sidwell.
@@TheDragonHistorian archaeogenetics confirmed that Austroasiatic O1b1 had already migrated to Southeast Asia mainland, part of marine and the Philippines 9,200 years ago. The Hoabinhians also contained Austroasiatic Halogroups. Around the Dong Son period, the Red River Delta burial remains were mixed between Austroasiatic and Kra-Dai/Austronesian O1a1 , might be the legendary King An Duong and the Ouyue tribes who partly integrated themselves with local Austroasiatic elites.
Archaeogenetics >>> linguistic
I find that the place of origin of Austroasiatic peoples was changed to Pearl river basin(that could be related to Baiyue...?) instead of Yangtze river possibly due to previous comments by Dr. Sidwell😅
I hope Dragon Historian doesn't get an F or he'll rename the video and put a "inaccurate" tag like what happened to his Austroasiatic video.
What is Kanfarawadi? I can't seem to find any info about it online
Though I am not sure if we were a Chinese, Vietnamese,etc, but really, this map has helped me a lot to understand how our ancestors have migrated. Thank you very much for the video from North East India, Mizoram. 😑😑👍.
Nah, it's a pain, I really wish to know who were our ancestors. We called ourselves Zo people.
you can look for about your country's genetic origins
@@cynki5152 One of my friend has tested his DNA and see that he had Central Asia, Finnish, Inuit, Nepali 2%, Vietnamese and Han Chinese 87%.
But the thing I want to know is Chhinlung. Chhinlung is a place where our ancestors have come from.
@@ruatapachuauruatapachuau9116
The Chinese genes are inherently heterogeneous because in the past China invaded other countries and merged them. North and South China have very different appearances. Southern China today (southern of the Yangtze River) belongs to the land of Baiyue.
Most likely your ancestors came from there, then migrated gradually. The same ancestors land of Vietnamese people (as me) and Thailand
@@cynki5152 Thanks.
Linguistically speaking, your people is Sino-Tibetan. I've seen pictures of Sino-Tibetan peoples of Northeast India and they look very much a like to the Chinese, many of them look like Yellow River region Chinese, not even the Southern Chinese who are mixed with Hmong, Yue and other tribes.
Muang Sua was founded by the Mon people as well as That Phanom on the west Bank of the Mekong just north of Savannakhet, Sri Gotapura near Nakhom Phanom and Chantaburi near Vientiane.
Great Job!
Very detail job!
춘추전국시대의 역사와 국가 및 국가 간에 전쟁과 소수민족을 정리한 영상을 보고싶습니다!!
A great work of yours !!! 🧡
Who were the Hoabinhians? Were they an early Austroasiatic group? It says on Wikipedia that human remains from Laos and Malaysia that belonged in the Hoabinhian culture resembles some Orang Asli tribes from peninsular Malaysia (I guess the Senoi) and the Nicobarese and also shows relations with Khmer people.
Văn Hoá Hoà Bình is a pre-historic culture in the north Vietnam today which made the entire Southeast Asians descendants of its dwellers.
@@MinhNguyen-ff6xf Austronesian people does not come from Hoabinh Culture
Great video you can see the modern day borders of Vietnam slowly from. But why use Bce and not just Bc.
형님 지리고 갑니다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
이전에 그 제작 들어갔다고 커뮤 공지떴을때부터 기다렸는데 좋아요 안박을수 없네요
Continuing on my previous comments, just read this new paper and it seems that by some metrics, Cantonese are more Austronesian-shifted than some Filipino groups if I'm reading it correctly. That's wild and how'd that even happen? There's something it called the "Southern Chinese Cluster" consisting of Austronesians, Kra-Dai, Hmong-mien, and Southern Han Chinese. From "Genomic Insights Into the Demographic History of the Southern Chinese" the published version. It also said that Austronesians are as genetically close to Hmong-miens as they are to Kra-Dai. These groups have the most prevalence of the MC1R gene which can be seen in their lips, nippls, hair, etc. (Neanderthal Origin ... MC1R in Modern Humans by Qiliang Ding et al. Fig. 3). If you look closely at their hair these groups have a red tone as compared to the straight black of other Asians, red facial hairs though sparse, blondism, etc.
Austroasiatics are not the main Baiyue at all, not in the least. Any genomics paper on southern China can tell you the lineages. Vietnamese are the exception, not the rule, and are actually mostly a Kra-Dai lineage with some Han Chinese, Hmong-mien, and Austronesian that shifted to speaking the Vietnamese language. They do retain their Austroasiatic lineage strongly in their blood but it's not their main lineage anymore. Austroasiatics (except for Vietnamese) do not share the southern Chinese lineage as much as the other groups I mentioned.
Yes South china=áutroasiatic + taikadai +austroanesian
Also, '... While no conclusive study to determine whether Funan's ethnolinguistic components were Austronesian or Austroasiatic, there is dispute among scholars. According to the majority of Vietnamese academics, for example, Mac Duong, stipulates that "Funan's core population certainly were the Austronesians, not Khmer;" ...' Etc.
This is so detailed how does one even make this??
@@Nohatedont ah, are you his second channel?
I’m asking cuz like, I’ve seen these stuff and make maps before but never on this level of detail. This is quite obscure at the very least and require professional informational access at most. Usually books and websites have some info but the history of zomia is quite difficult to track, only modern distribution. I also just wanna ask the creator as well in case I could ask him for some info I couldn’t find.
13:57 Burma (UK) and Rattanakosin (Siam) are colored similarly (red). That makes them confused.
Rattanakosin and Ayutthaya use Red colour in Uniform and Flag similar to British
Rattanakosin(Siam) has white elephant in the middle of the flag!
so amazing, many thanks
Shouldn't Peninsular Malaysia be included as well since it is MAINLAND
Categorically, it is considered part of Maritime Southeast Asia, if I'm not mistaken.
@@Urlocallordandsavior i understand but peninsula malaysia still part of mainland asia
@@first761 Culturally and historically, it's more in line with maritime Southeast Asia (it was controlled by two empires based in Indonesia after all). Same thing with Vietnam (culturally very Sinitic-influenced but its location makes it in SE Asia).
Southeast Asia's a large and diverse region, you have to split it accordingly somehow (ideally a mix of shared cultures/histories/location).
Peninsular Malaysia are majority East Asian.
@@iamgreat1234 lol you wish.
Hi Dragon love your videos they are amazing.
How about you do Lisbon for a video it would be great if you could, thanks and continue the great work that you do.
As a southeast asian, i am very happy that you made this video!
What kind of SE Asian are you?
Thank you for this
13:42 Thailand is really big
Big because fake history by this fake video.... thiefland 🇹🇭 made by your own talk by your own and lies by your own
Doesn't surprise me that Northern Vietnam where Hà noi now sits, developed early civilizationally. It's flat, low-level, humid, and warm and therefore very fertile. Easy to get a large population going.
This is very true in Vietnam history, it is the cradle of the world.
Can you do maritime southeast asia next?
A very good video about Southeast Asia
It is still inconclusive to say that Yangzi people speak Austroasiatic. I suggest keeping it Yangtze languages until further evidence comes to light.
ขอบคุณจากประเทศไทย นี้เป็นวิดิโอที่ดีที่สุด งานวิจัยด้าน DNA คนไทยส่วนใหญ่มี DNA -Mons นี้คือสิ่งที่ถูกต้องที่สุดแต่เคยดูมา ตรงกับหลักฐานทางประวัติศาสตร์
ไม่ตรงครับช่วง ปี 1431-1863 คือปีที่เขมรตกเมืองขึ้น สยามละเวียดนาม มันหายไปไหน ??
@@bankk7314 ลองบอกเขาดูค่ะ เขาแก้ทุกปี
You forgot ethnic warlords in Myanmar like Wa, Kokang, Kachin...
Fantastic video 👏👏👏👏
The whole SEA area is one of the areas on Earth that I know little about! I know more about Africa and the Pacific Islands than I know about SEA.
Thank you so much for making this video!
The vietnam war is most of the tragic, famous war bro its in sea
Thailand as a country of Thai people started at 1238
Lovely video
If Thailand didn't lost land in the south of Myanmar. Thailand tourism would be more lively and colorful.
The person that made this videos is thiefland🇹🇭for sure. Look at khmer empire map when the real map is so big and they even add Dvaravati that no one in south east asian never counted as a country before that the fake embarrassing videos i never seen in my life. Everyone know that khmer empire dominance over Thailand Lao in modern time. Thailand is like a child with no where to born they always try to fake the history from time to time that's disgusting.
Between
12:18 12:19 ls Toungoo most big kingdom in there?
Yes, Taungoo was the biggest empire in mainland Southeast Asian history and the second biggest in the whole of Southeast Asian history.
I would point out that Baiyue were renowned for their sailing ability and Austroasiatics really seem to not have taken too well to life on the coasts and seas for whatever reason with Vietnamese as the rare exception. I think one of the more interesting findings of modern science regarding this is that those in Lingnan (Guangdong, Guangxi, N. Vietnam) were actually originally genetically Kra-Dais and Austronesians that underwent language shifts to Vietnamese, Cantonese, etc. For example, Cantonese like many other southern Han languages exhibit a significant Kra-Dai substratum. Any genomics papers on southern China can substantiate this. Nonetheless, there's something not necessarily in the languages of these groups, but moreso in their culture, knowledge and biological DNA that allowed them to thrive and prosper on the coasts and seas. Even Cambodians have some type of major genetic Austronesian-Tai lineage that exceeds their Austroasiatic one though marginally, which isn't seen (for example in f3 outgroup statistics) in the "pure" Austroasiatics that are more inland such as Htin Mal, etc. And even Funan (a precursor to Angkor Wat) may quite likely also have been an Austronesian kingdom.
"you thought the HRE was bad?"
Southeast Asia in a nutshell:
Archipelago Countries: trade? Ja ja ja trade trade spice? Ja ja
Mainland: *(DooM Eternal Soundtrack)*
Didn’t know Lao and Thai spoke the same language family .
Both of them are Tai-speaking peoples
Cool work
Inaccurate. Vieto-Katuic were much older than the semi legend Au Lac kingdom, roughly the same time of the Hoabinhians. And they lived side by side with Tai and Hlai speaking peoples, as archaeogenetics confirmed.
you are the best in the world?,they take the data of the world's knowledge,you still deny it? are you smarter than the person who made this video? who do you think You Are? 🤣🤣
amazing,thank you
The MONS play major role in the modern-day Thailand where its also became Mon-Khmer after. Then its diverted apart
The area of Dong Hung, Thuong Tu, Phong Thanh and the present-day Giang Binh-Bach Long area used to belong to Vietnam for a long time until the 19th century, because in the process of dominating Vietnam, the French made some mistakes. mistake and signed with the Qing Dynasty the Franco-Qing Treaty of 1887, resulting in the above regions falling into Chinese hands. Dongxing was formed at the end of the Ming Dynasty, flourished during the Qing Dynasty, with over 400 years of history. Tay, Zhuang, Nung, and H'mong ethnic groups live
South East Asia History
Mainland : war war war!
Archipelago : Trade boy?
Vietnam is a Southeast Asian country, but it feels similar to the history of Northeast Asia in that it achieved centralization quickly, is a Confucian culture, and has constantly fought with China.
most of the time was part of China, sure finally Vietnamese own their indepence after the suck like shiit Song dynasty
@@hf_61 You seem to be very disappointed that China can not absorbed the Vietnamese region into China. Anyway, now it is a land by Vietnamese people.
@@jin.24. im fine, China was already experience heavy job of poverty alleviation, and modern China do not need Vietnam's land now, good luck neighbor.
Alexander Woodside: Vietnam only became quite "Confucianized" during the reign of Gia Long and Minh Menh during the first half of 19th century, by enforcement of East Asian Sinic elitist traditions over Vietnamese peasantry, whom Southeast Asian naturally.
Result: 500 rebellions
@@cudanmang_theog 1800s ? i dont think so
wow this is the best video of SEA mainland i have ever seen , the detail in it