Equal % valves - Part 1 - What is the equation?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 42

  • @bart_seavey
    @bart_seavey 2 года назад +4

    For Equal Percentage valves, try instead: Cv = R^(x-1) for x > 0, where R is a fitting parameter.

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  2 года назад +2

      Hey Bart! Thanks for this, I've checked and you are correct apart from 1 small correction: Cv = Cv_max × R^(100-x). Thanks a lot for this one! To convert to this form from what I show in the video I see that m = - ln(R) and c = ln(Cv_max) + 100ln(R). I have added this to the sheet I link! Appreciate it.

    • @bart_seavey
      @bart_seavey 2 года назад +3

      @@ProcesswithPat I should have mentioned that in my equation x is a fraction between 0 and 1 (instead of 0% to 100%). And the resulting expression is a normalized Cv curve also with values between 0 and 1. Multiply those resulting values by Cv_max to revert back to a non-normalized curve. I have worked with an equal percentage valve provider, and the expression above was provided, with different values of R.

  • @manojgupta3944
    @manojgupta3944 3 года назад +3

    Thanks Pete....I have never seen any one else explaining the basics so simply and fluidly....Your 10 min video is equal to watching 10 different videos . Thanks

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  3 года назад +1

      I’ll tell Pete you said thanks ;) No problem though! Am glad it’s useful, that’s why I made it!

    • @manojgupta3944
      @manojgupta3944 3 года назад

      @@ProcesswithPat Sorry for misspelling Pat. ☺️

  • @Bruh-vp6qf
    @Bruh-vp6qf 2 года назад +1

    Really good topics for junior engineers in general, especially those working in plants and even design

  • @cooldawg2009
    @cooldawg2009 3 года назад

    Best explanation i’ve seen yet and truly the only one that has made sense yet. Thx so much for making this!

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  3 года назад

      Glad it makes sense! I did the video because this is something that wasn’t clear to me either.

  • @jameslin748
    @jameslin748 2 года назад

    Hey mate, this video was excellent. The explanation, the video quality, everything. Keep making them!

  •  2 года назад +1

    I really love the way you explain it, and I'm studying a subject whose name is "Process control" and refers to Valve Opening. So, thanks to this video I have more details about my problem. Thank you, sir!!!

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  2 года назад

      Glad to hear it! Good luck with the course!

  • @xse345
    @xse345 3 года назад +1

    Nice video as always. Good explanation 👍
    Waiting for part 2.

  • @kmh6578
    @kmh6578 9 месяцев назад

    Keep making these videos man

  • @vtbhanukiran1231
    @vtbhanukiran1231 2 года назад

    Beautiful explanation.
    Thank you.
    Wanted to know pressure drop across equal % control valve.

  • @shivendrarastogi6203
    @shivendrarastogi6203 6 месяцев назад

    Very well explained

  • @panoskb9405
    @panoskb9405 3 года назад +1

    Very nice video as always. I have a question for you somehow related to your topic, I will appreciate if you can give me some insight.
    "When control valves are mounted between pipe reducers, there is a decrease in the actual valve capacity."

    I do not agree with this and my argument is the following if we add reducers before and after the control valve that means we have more pressure drop in the lines upstream and downstream the control valve, which consequently, means that the control valve can do less DP. Less DP for control valve leads to more Cv (valve capacity)? What is your opinion on that?

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  3 года назад +1

      Hey, thanks a lot! So we are on the same page - adding reducers will increase dP. I do not understand the part of your argument where you say "consequently, means that the control valve can do less DP". What exactly are you imagining? A different valve, or the same one?
      When people say capacity drops they mean that if you have two IDENTICAL systems where the valve characteristics and Cv in both systems are the same but the only difference is one system has reducers on the valve and the other doesn't, then the flow through the system with the reducers will be lower due to higher dP. I think that's what is meant by "the valve capacity is lower".
      What you are saying is that because there is additional dP due to the reducers one would need to install a larger valve, one with a greater Cv/capacity, in order to maintain the exact the same flow through the system.

    • @panoskb9405
      @panoskb9405 3 года назад

      @@ProcesswithPat thanks for your reply. You got my point. If I want to keep the same flow, then reducers will cause more DP in the piping system, which means a bigger valve or alternatively the DP of the control valve is lower. We agree on that, right? Regarding the other statement, the flow is not constant, so more restrictions means lower flow can pass through, according to Poisseuille law. Do you agre

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  3 года назад +1

      Yeah I agree with what you’re saying it’s just that when you say lower dP OR larger valve - to me those are almost the same thing. The way you get lower do is with a higher Cv valve.

    • @panoskb9405
      @panoskb9405 3 года назад

      @@ProcesswithPat I agree with you! Nice discussion. Btw, do you have any good reference about the percentage of DPvalve comparing to the DP of piping system??

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  3 года назад

      Have you watched part 2 of the equal percentage valve video where I talk about why they are used? There I discuss this exact point, although I do not remember whether I gave an actual reference.

  • @markonovicic9836
    @markonovicic9836 2 года назад

    Many thanks for your detailed and clear explanation. One question please - are the equal % valves same to the logarithmic characteristic ones?

  • @Hiteshmahadik-v2y
    @Hiteshmahadik-v2y Год назад

    Where and which process required this Equal persentage valve

  • @phaniy1398
    @phaniy1398 2 года назад

    Hi Pat, thanks for the interesting video. So, please help me out on my query. I can solve the equation for 'm' and 'c' by taking any two points of valve openings. Then, using these values how can I calculate theoretical flow rate of gas (with some water, talking about choke valves) through the valve? Please suggest.

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  2 года назад

      Hey there! You can work out the flow rate of the gas from the Cv, once you e calculated it, only if you have the pressure drop of the valve using the equation that defined Cv for gases.
      Choked flow is a special condition achieved when the critical pressure ratio is achieved across the valve. The critical pressure ratio is only a function of the gas in question (ratio of Cp to Cv).

    • @phaniy1398
      @phaniy1398 2 года назад

      @@ProcesswithPat Hey!! I do have Pressure differential value across the choke valve. With this information, how can I calculate the flow through the choke valve. Please share some useful references on this.

  • @chandansasaram
    @chandansasaram Год назад

    Thank for sharing

  • @abychasperindie5979
    @abychasperindie5979 2 года назад

    Equal percentage must be use positioner valve or can be only actuator?

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  2 года назад +1

      Hey Aby! I would not say that they MUST use a positioner. In my head the use of a positioner on an actuator is independent of the valve trim used.

    • @abychasperindie5979
      @abychasperindie5979 2 года назад

      Thanks you sir

  • @panoskb9405
    @panoskb9405 2 года назад

    Hi Pat, very often I go and watch your videos again. They are so informative and you really try to understand how things work. I would like to ask you a question, which is related to this topic and related to another video you did about pressure drops. I would like to show with a system resistance curve the effect of a control valve on the head of the system. Actually, when the flow rate reduces, which means valve opening reduces, then the head of the system increases. How I could describe this with a head loss term? To be more precise how I can find a relationship between the opening of the control valve and the resistance coefficient L, which will show me this increase in the head of my system?
    Sorry for the huge question.

  • @nomnamecpp
    @nomnamecpp Год назад

    Subscribed

  • @박박장호-e9o
    @박박장호-e9o 8 месяцев назад

    perfect!!!!

  • @19walker23
    @19walker23 2 года назад

    May i have the sizing valve program please

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  2 года назад

      The link to the sheet I use is in the description 👌

  • @foodhomeliu4021
    @foodhomeliu4021 3 года назад

    How to prove the equal percentage equation F=kR^(x-1) from linear equation F=kx where x is opening of valve and k= Cvmax* (delta p/ SG)^0.5

    • @ProcesswithPat
      @ProcesswithPat  3 года назад

      I'm not sure I understand your question.

  • @abdessamedghettas7167
    @abdessamedghettas7167 2 года назад

    Thanks

  • @plankmax8748
    @plankmax8748 2 года назад

    nice

  • @JasonMitchellofcompsci
    @JasonMitchellofcompsci 9 месяцев назад

    Um Cv=e^(mx+c) can't be solved for zero either.