I know we shouldn't assume malice when we can assume incompetence. But coming on radio to advocate for the Rwanda scheme.... I'm not seeing much competence with basic maths.
'I'm glad you asked that question and let me be perfectly honest with you... as you know, there's a review going on at the moment and it wouldn't be appropriate to comment until that process has been completed...'
Why question a smuggling baron. She just presided over the largest migration from India last year alone. 250K in one year. Call it illegal,legal or whatever you like... the number she let in was 1 Million met in 1 year. And they hid it ..and published a lower number. Im just disgusted by Marr, allowing her to yap on as an authority.
Shes probably already planned to move to reform and agreed with Farage. If you look at those moving over the reform they come every 6 to 8 weeks they are do this to stay in the news, if reform announced all those defecting the same week this early there would be massive news coverage for a few days then that would be it. Farage love him or hate him he is very politically and strangely smart far smarter than anyone in the labour party, if there are labour defectors or high profile torys like Reece Mog they will be told to sit on their hands and wait until judt before the may elections and until then there will be defections of low profile people every few months .
Even if Reform were identical to the Tories, any politician would be able to find a criticism of the party, or its leader. They are their political rivals. The fact that she couldn't do that, even when repeatedly asked means she is certain to jump IMO.
@@Al-Hunt-acrylic-painter Labour are making unforced errors, which have their supporters facepalming. Prime example, announcing cuts to WFA, ahead of the budget. This allowed the media to run anti-Labour articles for weeks, and frighten millions of pensioners, or their relatives, needlessly. Even though many of those they frightened have now been shown it won't affect them, or have now successfully applied for Pension Credit, to retain their WFA, they won't forget that initial fright, and it will become a wedge to use against Labour for a generation, like 'milk snatcher' was used against Thatcher. Labour should have run the campaign to find people eligible for Pension Credit first. Given millions of pensioners extra money they hadn't expected. Then rolled out the cuts to WFA as part of the wider budget, balanced by the other measures. First impressions matter. People will remember having something taken away, longer than they remember later finding out they can keep it. Getting extra £000s pension credit would have been a feelgood factor, that allowed the WFA cut to pass by under the radar, as it 'only affects richer pensioners, not people like me'.
The worst aspect of finding out that Bravermans husband joined Reform is finding out that someone; not in a coma or a Secure Unit, actually wanted to marry Braverman.
If you listen to some of her interviews, she explains in depth how she was stopped at every single level. How own party said no. This is why she must join
Reducing migration was a Tory manifesto pledge, but it failed to understand that we need immigration as we are an aging demographic , why does no one put that to her? EU migration boosted UK prosperity, the reason why she wants lower migration is because it helps shrink the state and protects the assets of the Tory core voter base, and she would purse that irrespective of the demographic and economic facts, which is why we should be very wary about politicians that fail to understand the reality of what the country is and what is happening. I remember her total support of Brexit saying 'our best years are ahead of us' if we left the EU; but did not articulate how and why, she is an ideologue that should be challenged, Marr didn't.
We need immigration because of falling birth rates and an ageing population, but we don't need mass immigration - the difference is scale. The policy ideal is to have a diminishing number of immigrants every year combined with delivering assertive AI, housebuilding and childcare strategies at the same to offset the need for such an influx long-term and simultaneously promoting family formation. At least with these strategies in place the government can say its pulled more or less every lever it can to enable the population to close the gap on its own - if productivity doesn't rise after that then its then a cultural matter and to do with attitude.
@@MrXaphus Mass migration? Define that first. We need migration to meet the needs of a aging demographic, the UK birth rate is : "2023: The TFR decreased to 1.44 children per woman" well below replacement of a balanced aged ranged demographic. A diminishing number of immigrants per year to be replaced by AI? That is a idea I have not heard of at all, and when is AI going to fill out hospitality, health care, agriculture and distribution? I assume you mean by automation. Well, I am no luddite but I see AI as complimentary to human activity not a replacement of it across all sectors of the economy. That is a bit like the 1960's White Heat of technology prediction that nuclear power will be too cheap to meter!! That was simply a ideological position, based on a false perspective of what technology would deliver. I am equally wary about what AI will deliver, it will certainly not be the other 60's prediction that computers would render work by humans almost unnecessary and we would all have a working week based on hours not days!
@@MrXaphus Promoting family formation? How? As I have pointed out the UK birth rate is well below replacement and we are aging fast. Read: "In 2022, 19% of the UK's population was aged 65 or older, and the median age in England and Wales was 40 years. This is up from 13% and 39 years, respectively, in 1972. The UK's population is projected to continue aging, with the number of people aged 65 or older expected to rise to 27% of the population by 2072" so how would you reverse that trend? Ban contraception? Large tax breaks for more than 3 children, bit like France making the second child 'free' by grants from the state? That does not sound very Tory to me, more socialistic, not something Suella would approve of.
Why dont they fire her for this massive waist of moneyon Ruanda and make her pay tax payer back from her walet.Why is she still speaking?Shes one of the nastiests politicians out there.She should definitly pay price for waisting my taxes like that.Didnt she loose her seat.Why is she on the telly still?
@@wiseget-f7e ah, emojis, when English isn't your first language but you don't want to admit it. Remind me again of Braverman's achievements. Take your time...
Her hands were tied regrettably. The buck stops with the PM and she was continually blocked. It’s the Labour government who is a disgrace and things are already going from bad to worse not least for our freezing cold pensioners and are farmers. Labour have absolutely no interest or intention of addressing the population explosion of this country. Just imagine where we are going to be in four or five years time. Reform is our last hope.
The tories really don't like leaky sue, she couldn’t even get enough MPs to nominate her for leader of the party. When even sunak's tories think your unstable and incompetent...
@chatham43 this is so weird. I got comments from two simplistic trolls, neither of whom actually had a point to make. Apparently, I live rent-free in the heads of foreign trolls! Quite a result for me!
Thats the sort of de-platforming sentiment that has the opposite effect of turning the electorate towards people like Suella, it happened in America with Trump don’t think it can’t happen here.
I despise Reform, but actually I’d be ok with it if they win. They are currently our only route to PR. Without them we are stuck with Tory or Starmers Tory Labour. I’ll take another few rough years with reform leading if we finally get PR and can vote left wing
When you listen to these people firstly understand the Art of speaking from both sides of their mouth. I don't support any political party because politics in its essentials has died. But, it was Starmer who recently admitted that mass immigration was an 'experiment'. An experiment in 'what' is something that I'm not too clear about. I'm assuming that it was about the economy. Foreign investors would be interested in investing in an economy that had a glut of cheap labour? Under the Conservatives growth flat-lined and the economy shrank. The 'experiment' has failed, or what?
Growth flat-lined, because of Tory Austerity, taking funds from lower earners, who spend it through multiple hands (taxed at each point) before it arrives back in the Treasury, at £zero cost to the public purse. They gave that money instead, to rich people, who hid it offshore, costing the public purse. Migration isn't the cause. Increasing the population by one sixth of one percent isn't even a blip on the radar, compared to slashing all departmental budgets by 10%, year on year, and giving the money away to their donors.
As a member of reform, I’d welcome suella with open arms. Easily aligned almost fully with what reform believes in and would be a huge household name to add to the ranks. I can’t see why her constituents would mind too much as they obviously voted for a right leaning Tory so surely if she joined a party that was genuinely right wing like reform is then her people would be on board with that I’d have thought
This woman who believes that being homeless is a choice. Austerity is necessary only to keep workers in unimaginable poverty, in favor of the Bankers who have become Billionaires!!!
There aren’t two conservative parties, reform are the only conservatives. The Conservative Party that she is in won’t leave the ECHR and have already failed to secure our borders. Her party didn’t want her as leader because she was right wing, that should tell you everything about their current leanings.
Why, I wonder, legal immigration can be capped. We simply need safe routes set up for that. The illegal routes can be controlled by going after the smugglers and various other approaches, as well as strict immigration requirements for the English channel routes. But the truth is - there are no simple and easy solutions here.
The illegal routes collapse overnight, if the overseas asylum/refugee application offices are reopened. Nobody is going to pay £000s to a shady gang, when they can walk into an embassy and plead their case there. The boat crossings began when Patel closed those application routes.
What exactly will Reform be reforming? Flogging the country to Global Corporations? A miniscule government that only exists to enact and enforce the Corporations economic policies? You really don't have a clue.
@@bensmith6554 That's as may be but the issue is she and others insist that it was ok because their parents came in legally whilst ignoring the fact that for many people there is NO legal way to come to the UK. Simply pretending that isn't the case as she tried to do as Home Secretary isn't acceptable.
@@chatham43 eh? Obviously UK citizens have the right to enter the country so that negates your nobody statement. My point is idiots keep jumping up and down about illegal immigration but won't accept that there are very limited safe and legal routes. Also legal migration is huge. It's almost like the last lot wanted to divert attention from that.
There’s plenty of places to go if you want to hear about how terrible this government is! Including some of LBC even with Ferrari. A tiny portion of the media is sort of sympathetic to Labour.
Guess you weren't listening to the right programme. LBC has plenty of right wing presenters. Ferrari, Dale, Miraj, etc. Perhaps they'd be more to your liking.
I honestly think we need change and reform can be the only one to match Labour I hope they get it right with their personnel otherwise we are looking at over 8 years of labour which I think even lbc viewers will now think is not ideal.
Reform would change the UK into their friend's libertarian utopia: No equality legislation, a less efficient healthcare system.... The change they are offering is not in the working person's best interest.
Give the power to Reform millionaires - yes of course they will look after the population as a whole... It's like pretending Brexit wasn't driven by tax avoiders desperate to avoid paying more UK tax for the NHS, schools, roads, etc.
If she was serious about processing arrivals, she would have actually processed them, rather than spending hundreds of millions on the Rwanda debacle.
I hate to break it to her, but drones have been patrolling the Dover Straits for years. As a former Home Secretary, she should know all about this.
Two options here, she either forgot or is lying…
The navy was too in 2022 - incidentally the busiest year for small boats. She's literally just throwing around any words that sound 'tough'.
Stop throwing facts at her while she’s busy lighting fires
You make it so hard to appeal to right wing knuckle draggers if you keep ruining the story
I know we shouldn't assume malice when we can assume incompetence. But coming on radio to advocate for the Rwanda scheme.... I'm not seeing much competence with basic maths.
Remember, Labour only have to deport one person arriving via boat, to outperform 8 years of Tory failure.
Just one.
She will cross the floor eventually, when it becomes a matter of career in politics or not!
I wish the very best for suellas future. I for one hope she gets placed as the new unite health CEO
Why do you bother to give her a voice! Just wave her goodbye please!
She’ll join reform. Only a matter of time
It would be the sensible thing to do. British politics is changing. People have had enough of the Tories and Labour. You can feel it in the air.
Most Reform supporters would welcome her with open arms, she is the most consistent right winger amongst Tories
She is probably waiting to see how things go over the next couple of years whilst using the attention to keep herself relevant.
@@vordman Yep, people want to elect the liars just like in the US
Robust has to be the most over-used word in politics right now.
'I'm glad you asked that question and let me be perfectly honest with you... as you know, there's a review going on at the moment and it wouldn't be appropriate to comment until that process has been completed...'
Relevance is lost on you.
No, woke is still the trendiest
Why question a smuggling baron. She just presided over the largest migration from India last year alone. 250K in one year. Call it illegal,legal or whatever you like... the number she let in was 1 Million met in 1 year. And they hid it
..and published a lower number.
Im just disgusted by Marr, allowing her to yap on as an authority.
We're just taking over this country now. Nothing you can do about it 😂
the shocking part of the interview is that she has friends!
@brut Don't throw stones boyo.😊
She's being unduly liberal with the term 'friends'.
Suella Braverman has lots of friends and supporters.
Suella Braverman so badly wants to join Reform,
I think she probably will the way the wind is blowing.
We must certainly encourage her to widen her opportunities with Reform!
She has a safe Tory seat. If she switches to Reform they don’t have any safe seats for her to take.
This is the happiest she's ever sounded.
No, that was when she was announcing the weekly channel drownings.
Her ambition was to build up the numbers, not cure the problem.
Shes probably already planned to move to reform and agreed with Farage. If you look at those moving over the reform they come every 6 to 8 weeks they are do this to stay in the news, if reform announced all those defecting the same week this early there would be massive news coverage for a few days then that would be it.
Farage love him or hate him he is very politically and strangely smart far smarter than anyone in the labour party, if there are labour defectors or high profile torys like Reece Mog they will be told to sit on their hands and wait until judt before the may elections and until then there will be defections of low profile people every few months .
The defections of Tory MPs earlier this year were similarly planned. The difference is they were MPs.
Even if Reform were identical to the Tories, any politician would be able to find a criticism of the party, or its leader. They are their political rivals. The fact that she couldn't do that, even when repeatedly asked means she is certain to jump IMO.
How is farage more intelligent than labour?
@@Al-Hunt-acrylic-painter
Labour are making unforced errors, which have their supporters facepalming.
Prime example, announcing cuts to WFA, ahead of the budget. This allowed the media to run anti-Labour articles for weeks, and frighten millions of pensioners, or their relatives, needlessly.
Even though many of those they frightened have now been shown it won't affect them, or have now successfully applied for Pension Credit, to retain their WFA, they won't forget that initial fright, and it will become a wedge to use against Labour for a generation, like 'milk snatcher' was used against Thatcher.
Labour should have run the campaign to find people eligible for Pension Credit first.
Given millions of pensioners extra money they hadn't expected.
Then rolled out the cuts to WFA as part of the wider budget, balanced by the other measures.
First impressions matter. People will remember having something taken away, longer than they remember later finding out they can keep it.
Getting extra £000s pension credit would have been a feelgood factor, that allowed the WFA cut to pass by under the radar, as it 'only affects richer pensioners, not people like me'.
Shell be over as soon as the cheque clears 😂
tut tut Kev to imply (like Andrea Jenkyns and Lee Neanderthol) that Reform Plc bribed them to join. Just b4 Joining
Coin flip - she bumps Badenoch or runs as Farage's Deputy.
More than Suella managed to get done and in a lot less time than 14 years.
The worst aspect of finding out that Bravermans husband joined Reform is finding out that someone; not in a coma or a Secure Unit, actually wanted to marry Braverman.
Braverman had an opportunity to resolve this problem when she was home secretary and we all know how successful she was
If you listen to some of her interviews, she explains in depth how she was stopped at every single level. How own party said no. This is why she must join
Reducing migration was a Tory manifesto pledge, but it failed to understand that we need immigration as we are an aging demographic , why does no one put that to her? EU migration boosted UK prosperity, the reason why she wants lower migration is because it helps shrink the state and protects the assets of the Tory core voter base, and she would purse that irrespective of the demographic and economic facts, which is why we should be very wary about politicians that fail to understand the reality of what the country is and what is happening. I remember her total support of Brexit saying 'our best years are ahead of us' if we left the EU; but did not articulate how and why, she is an ideologue that should be challenged, Marr didn't.
I don't agree with this at all.
We need immigration because of falling birth rates and an ageing population, but we don't need mass immigration - the difference is scale. The policy ideal is to have a diminishing number of immigrants every year combined with delivering assertive AI, housebuilding and childcare strategies at the same to offset the need for such an influx long-term and simultaneously promoting family formation. At least with these strategies in place the government can say its pulled more or less every lever it can to enable the population to close the gap on its own - if productivity doesn't rise after that then its then a cultural matter and to do with attitude.
@@MCDONALD6969 Why?
@@MrXaphus Mass migration? Define that first. We need migration to meet the needs of a aging demographic, the UK birth rate is : "2023: The TFR decreased to 1.44 children per woman" well below replacement of a balanced aged ranged demographic. A diminishing number of immigrants per year to be replaced by AI? That is a idea I have not heard of at all, and when is AI going to fill out hospitality, health care, agriculture and distribution? I assume you mean by automation. Well, I am no luddite but I see AI as complimentary to human activity not a replacement of it across all sectors of the economy. That is a bit like the 1960's White Heat of technology prediction that nuclear power will be too cheap to meter!! That was simply a ideological position, based on a false perspective of what technology would deliver. I am equally wary about what AI will deliver, it will certainly not be the other 60's prediction that computers would render work by humans almost unnecessary and we would all have a working week based on hours not days!
@@MrXaphus Promoting family formation? How? As I have pointed out the UK birth rate is well below replacement and we are aging fast. Read: "In 2022, 19% of the UK's population was aged 65 or older, and the median age in England and Wales was 40 years. This is up from 13% and 39 years, respectively, in 1972. The UK's population is projected to continue aging, with the number of people aged 65 or older expected to rise to 27% of the population by 2072" so how would you reverse that trend? Ban contraception? Large tax breaks for more than 3 children, bit like France making the second child 'free' by grants from the state? That does not sound very Tory to me, more socialistic, not something Suella would approve of.
Why dont they fire her for this massive waist of moneyon Ruanda and make her pay tax payer back from her walet.Why is she still speaking?Shes one of the nastiests politicians out there.She should definitly pay price for waisting my taxes like that.Didnt she loose her seat.Why is she on the telly still?
Who cares about her, she's the day before yesterdays news desperately seeking relevance.
Why waste time talking to this woman?
Funny that Suella mentions quick processing. I'm sure that she was home secretary at some point
Would they have her? Just asking.
No change there then.... Lie.. on lie ...
It's "really complex," which is why the Rwanda scheme did nothing but cost money.
It did nothing because it never got started
Certainly did when Labour wrote it all off.!!
@@chatham43 Three years and four returns (under a separate voluntary program). What a farce. China builds 5,000 km of new motorway every year.
@@beautifulpeople1427 Spending 715 million to move exactly 0 deportees is a crazy start tbf
Yes.
She can talk 😂
That Musk donation looks to already have arrived then, judging by the amount of defections since the Musk donation intent was made public.
She is back to borders again folks.
Lecturing Labour on the best way to solve the imagined immigration crisis her party deliberately constructed over 14 years.
For a Cambridge graduate she speaks very poorly.
She’s a disgrace
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@alan And that's why you voted Labour. And here we are.😊
@@wiseget-f7e ah, emojis, when English isn't your first language but you don't want to admit it. Remind me again of Braverman's achievements. Take your time...
Her hands were tied regrettably. The buck stops with the PM and she was continually blocked. It’s the Labour government who is a disgrace and things are already going from bad to worse not least for our freezing cold pensioners and are farmers. Labour have absolutely no interest or intention of addressing the population explosion of this country. Just imagine where we are going to be in four or five years time. Reform is our last hope.
"MERCYS SAYS NO TO JUMPING SHIPS" ❤🇬🇧❤
Maybe she won't defect this week, but...
The tories really don't like leaky sue, she couldn’t even get enough MPs to nominate her for leader of the party. When even sunak's tories think your unstable and incompetent...
She’s in your head, rent free!😂😂😂
@ignorance Thank goodness you voted Labour in and not a pensioner!😊
@chatham43 this is so weird. I got comments from two simplistic trolls, neither of whom actually had a point to make. Apparently, I live rent-free in the heads of foreign trolls! Quite a result for me!
@@wiseget-f7e yes, because this entire video isn't about her. How foolish of me to miss that...
@ignorance Stick with your ignorance and we'll all be happy.😊
Musk already has her bought and paid for!. 😆😄😁....
Is suella the right colour for reform?
If it advances their cause then yes. Why wouldn't they have her?
Shame on LBC for treating her as though she has any credibility.
Just the opposite. Marr is a master at letting people embarrass themselves. He had her confirm that she still dreams of a Rwanda solution.
So LBC should be dictated to by your opinion?
@@chatham43 fascinating opinion, chatham. Remind me again, what does LBC stand for?
Thats the sort of de-platforming sentiment that has the opposite effect of turning the electorate towards people like Suella, it happened in America with Trump don’t think it can’t happen here.
Shame on @Monklane for not wanting to hear differences of opinions from political opponents and debate the same.
I despise Reform, but actually I’d be ok with it if they win. They are currently our only route to PR.
Without them we are stuck with Tory or Starmers Tory Labour.
I’ll take another few rough years with reform leading if we finally get PR and can vote left wing
When you listen to these people firstly understand the Art of speaking from both sides of their mouth. I don't support any political party because politics in its essentials has died. But, it was Starmer who recently admitted that mass immigration was an 'experiment'. An experiment in 'what' is something that I'm not too clear about. I'm assuming that it was about the economy. Foreign investors would be interested in investing in an economy that had a glut of cheap labour? Under the Conservatives growth flat-lined and the economy shrank. The 'experiment' has failed, or what?
Growth flat-lined, because of Tory Austerity, taking funds from lower earners, who spend it through multiple hands (taxed at each point) before it arrives back in the Treasury, at £zero cost to the public purse.
They gave that money instead, to rich people, who hid it offshore, costing the public purse.
Migration isn't the cause.
Increasing the population by one sixth of one percent isn't even a blip on the radar, compared to slashing all departmental budgets by 10%, year on year, and giving the money away to their donors.
As a member of reform, I’d welcome suella with open arms. Easily aligned almost fully with what reform believes in and would be a huge household name to add to the ranks. I can’t see why her constituents would mind too much as they obviously voted for a right leaning Tory so surely if she joined a party that was genuinely right wing like reform is then her people would be on board with that I’d have thought
You aren't a member of Reform.
They only have paying subscribers.
You have no input on the party direction, so stop pretending you do.
This woman who believes that being homeless is a choice. Austerity is necessary only to keep workers in unimaginable poverty, in favor of the Bankers who have become Billionaires!!!
There aren’t two conservative parties, reform are the only conservatives. The Conservative Party that she is in won’t leave the ECHR and have already failed to secure our borders. Her party didn’t want her as leader because she was right wing, that should tell you everything about their current leanings.
Why would we leave something we created, that's staffed by UK judges?
Only Belarus and Putin's Russia have left ECHR ...as a human I value those rights
Why, I wonder, legal immigration can be capped. We simply need safe routes set up for that. The illegal routes can be controlled by going after the smugglers and various other approaches, as well as strict immigration requirements for the English channel routes. But the truth is - there are no simple and easy solutions here.
The illegal routes collapse overnight, if the overseas asylum/refugee application offices are reopened.
Nobody is going to pay £000s to a shady gang, when they can walk into an embassy and plead their case there.
The boat crossings began when Patel closed those application routes.
There can be only one!
Andrew! Very groovy 😎 0:57
Couldn’t make it Outer Mongolia could you!
Could just process claims in France ....bang you just stopped the gangs
Why can't the UK border force stop the small boats in the channel as they don't have the proper paperwork and passports.
And then....?
Join reform uk 🇬🇧
Reform isn't a conservative party!
We need her in Reform! The Labour and conservative memberships are dissolving daily.
What exactly will Reform be reforming? Flogging the country to Global Corporations? A miniscule government that only exists to enact and enforce the Corporations economic policies? You really don't have a clue.
Does she want to stop the boats? Yes
Was she in a position to stop the boats? Yes
Did she stop the boats? No
Sounds ideal
@@dp7580 She could not stop the boats, Rishi and the Tory machine were against her, hence her removal.
Wrong colour for reform
Awful interview at both ends, Discuss policy!!
Sue Ella WHO????
@brian Don't you remember? She tried to stop the boats. Disgusting!
It’s Cruel Ella buddy
is suella the immigrant going home she can take patel with her.
She's British mate.
@FRANKIE You go too and it's a deal. Wouldn't it be worth it?😊
@@bensmith6554 That's as may be but the issue is she and others insist that it was ok because their parents came in legally whilst ignoring the fact that for many people there is NO legal way to come to the UK. Simply pretending that isn't the case as she tried to do as Home Secretary isn't acceptable.
@david Nobody has a right to enter this country ...whatever their circumstances.
@@chatham43 eh? Obviously UK citizens have the right to enter the country so that negates your nobody statement.
My point is idiots keep jumping up and down about illegal immigration but won't accept that there are very limited safe and legal routes.
Also legal migration is huge. It's almost like the last lot wanted to divert attention from that.
5 minutes after this interview she joined Reform
7:00 or so "I support hate"
Get over to reform 🎉🎉
A strong deterrent? It’s called saying goodbye to the ECHR
Braverman was less mentally ill than usual today
You should know!😂
vote reform
@stephen But you wern't judging by your comment!😊
Big Ears never listens.
Wow. This is a fantastic distraction from Starmer’s disastrous policies and failures No10! The Labour echo chamber at LBC is working/woking overtime!😂
There’s plenty of places to go if you want to hear about how terrible this government is! Including some of LBC even with Ferrari. A tiny portion of the media is sort of sympathetic to Labour.
As opposed to all the Tory client media.
Guess you weren't listening to the right programme. LBC has plenty of right wing presenters. Ferrari, Dale, Miraj, etc. Perhaps they'd be more to your liking.
She's the Assad that's just joined the Reform party?
I honestly think we need change and reform can be the only one to match Labour I hope they get it right with their personnel otherwise we are looking at over 8 years of labour which I think even lbc viewers will now think is not ideal.
Reform would change the UK into their friend's libertarian utopia: No equality legislation, a less efficient healthcare system.... The change they are offering is not in the working person's best interest.
She forgets her roots
Like you have yours
@jamjam2833 - شكرًا لك
@@XTRAIT-em4rx sorry I don’t t read gibberish
@@jamjam2833 - آسف لسماع ذلك
vote reform take our country back
Make Britain Punctuate Again.
Take it back and sell it to an American health insurance company you mean
Give the power to Reform millionaires - yes of course they will look after the population as a whole... It's like pretending Brexit wasn't driven by tax avoiders desperate to avoid paying more UK tax for the NHS, schools, roads, etc.
You mean take our country backwards?
vote reform
Vote for health insurance. Too bad if you have uninsurable conditions.
When ?
Why ?