Lecture 02-Continous Probability

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 18

  • @damian.gamlath
    @damian.gamlath 4 года назад +6

    0:30 Summary of discrete probabilities and outcomes
    2:06 Important axioms in probability
    7:04 Measurement of probabilities
    11:18 *Continuous Random Variables*
    16:13 Important change when we go from discrete to continuous probabilities - the idea of probability densities
    18:24 How to construct Probability Density Functions (PDF)
    24:00 Example 1: PDF in physics
    26:21 Example 2: Non-uniform distribution PDF in physics (Gaussian velocity distribution)
    31:05 Mapping one distribution to another

  • @sisirpynda5875
    @sisirpynda5875 4 года назад +1

    @21:40 the CPF dosen't need to be half only at 0 right it could be anywhere .... Depends on how we define the random variable right !!

    • @sisirpynda5875
      @sisirpynda5875 4 года назад

      Like I define a new random variable Y=X-1 now 1/2 is not at 0 but at "+1"

    • @sisirpynda5875
      @sisirpynda5875 4 года назад

      Like I define a new random variable Y=X-1 So now 1/2 is at 1

    • @kagodikomang2127
      @kagodikomang2127 4 года назад

      I think he is confusing Prob. density with the overall Probability _ probabilitygenerically is the area under the curve which its total is always equal to 1 and at the mid point the area under the curve is actually HALF

    • @rishabhkhatri
      @rishabhkhatri 2 года назад

      its 1/2 at 0 because there are equal numbers at both side of zero.

  • @ankitmishra2723
    @ankitmishra2723 3 года назад

    Thanks

  • @silverfox1754
    @silverfox1754 2 года назад

    @21:58 i don't think it should saturate to 1 at +ve infinity it should be a gaussian function or even a constant function because the variable can lie between -inf to +inf so the distribution is exactly half
    saturating to 1 or 0 means finding the variable there is highly possible or highly unlikely which is not the case here

    • @hershyfishman2929
      @hershyfishman2929 2 года назад

      You're not taking into account that it's cumulative.

  • @sidddddddddddddd
    @sidddddddddddddd 5 лет назад +1

    @19:52 Did you really put a square bracket with infinity? Damn!

    • @ianz.0
      @ianz.0 4 года назад +1

      He is not being precise in his notation I think.

    • @sidddddddddddddd
      @sidddddddddddddd 4 года назад

      GMN Come on, bro. It’s not about being precise. This is something we start learning in set theory in our school. And after spending so many years in science, this is something that comes automatically.

    • @ianz.0
      @ianz.0 4 года назад

      @@sidddddddddddddd Yeah true. Just watch his lectures. It kind of feels like he come without any preparation. It is really sad.

    • @damian.gamlath
      @damian.gamlath 4 года назад +1

      He's a physicist, not a mathematician lol

    • @damian.gamlath
      @damian.gamlath 4 года назад

      @@ianz.0 Still *heaps* better than some of my teachers...