That attacker was through. It was a tactical foul with no chance to get the ball, denying the attacking team a clear shot at the goal. That is pretty much the *definition* of what constitutes a sending-off.
@@DevSolar the player kicked the ball so far forward there was little chance he’d get there on time, there was also still a defender standing there so no red card. Foul? Yes. Card? Yes. But yellow. As the guy said, match sold
The other defender would have gotten the ball (or at least had a very very good chance at it). Wasn't clearly the last man, most referees would give yellow.
That shouldn't be a red card . The referee sold that match
That attacker was through. It was a tactical foul with no chance to get the ball, denying the attacking team a clear shot at the goal. That is pretty much the *definition* of what constitutes a sending-off.
@@DevSolar that' s the definition of a foul...
@@DevSolar the player kicked the ball so far forward there was little chance he’d get there on time, there was also still a defender standing there so no red card. Foul? Yes. Card? Yes. But yellow. As the guy said, match sold
if you genuinely dont think that is a red card then delete your comment because you're blind mate
Technically 5th second because the ball was no longer in play when the ref blew at 5s when he made the foul
difficult decision, but the attacker was going to goal; he was the last man!
Did we watch the same video? This is never a red card.
The other defender would have gotten the ball (or at least had a very very good chance at it). Wasn't clearly the last man, most referees would give yellow.
Obviously not the last man
Please subscribe for more content
Solo giallo