Apple Vision Pro: The Reality of VR Headsets
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 июн 2024
- 🎉 Buy the Quest 3 instead: howl.me/clFS6zysmRw
👉 Out Favorite Laptops: www.justjosh.tech/best-tech
► Follow Me
- Josh's New Channel: / @justjoshbusiness
- Instagram: / justjosh.life
- X: / justjoshlife
- TikTok: / justjoshtech
- Discord: discordapp.com/invite/MHrS4wG
► Timestamps
00:00 Intro
00:21 What the Vision Pro is
01:11 The Pros
02:08 The Issues
4:56 Conclusion
As an Amazon, Lenovo, Best Buy, B&H, Dell, and HP Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
#apple #visionpro #review #quest #gaming #3D #virtualreality #augmentedreality #students #student #laptop 
Наука
“Say you’re walking down the street with your future ex wife …” 😂😂
So I didn't mishear...
I spat my water out after hearing it 😂
That's quite spicy even for Josh.
Okay, that was so out of left field that it made me chuckle.
Haha I rewinded it twice to make sure he said that or it was my not so great English haha
This device feels more like a developers kit rather than a consumer device. I don’t see AR taking off as a mainstream computing paradigm until they’re as comfortable as wearing a pair of glasses.
Regurgitated talking points 😂😂
Are you old enought to remember the "bag" cell phones? I am. They were not comfortable, practicle or cheap, but they were the START of the cell phone movement. This is the same.
Yes, and the bag cell phones were not everyman consumer devices, they were mostly used by wealthy elites. It was several years down the line until there were mass market cell phones and many years more until it was commonplace for nearly everyone to have a cell phone. The AVP also only has a marginally better UX than a quest 3 which costs $3000 less. As it sits the AVP is very much a novelty and toy, and good if you want to get into the dev scene early for future devices.
People needs to get used to it, how they did with big smartphones(iphone max pro, it's heavy big and even small girl carry it and do not complain)
@@quentyns This is the start of nothing, this is just a poor attempt at an AR/VR headset that is behind it's rivals in multiple ways.
Considering how Tech has done an amazing job at disconnecting us as humans. Maybe it's time to not follow this tech. Just reminds me of a scary Black Mirror episode.
and it's gonna get worst.
0:22 But the Quest Pro and Quest 3 also combine AR and VR.
1:53 Holding a controller is not fatiguing, you just bend your forearm and point it with your wrist when you want to do something and then just drop your hands to your sides when you are done. You can also use hand tracking on the Quest 3.
This entire device screams bulls**t. Its too expensive for a first gen device and has too many compromises. Maybe the third or fourth gen version will be better, but this first gen product really is first gen.
I love these videos. They cut out useless additional information and get straight to the topic. Keep it up!
Did you guys only try it in the Apple Store or actually tested a personal one at home? I think it would’ve been important to mention that the box includes a double loop band, which significantly improves the comfort aspect
1 person bought it, 3 tried in store
love the additions to the team
I love this channel. Honest and to the point. You got my sub.
Thank you so much
The controller isn't required for all other headsets (specially Meta ones, hand tracking is a feature), controllers are better than just hands for many scenarios, and definitively there are a lot of AR/VR/MR devices out there...
I enjoyed seeing the review done by your team. I'm not a fan of any VR headsets because I'm prone to motion sickness (eardrum damage when I was a kid) so even if Apple dropped the price to realistic levels it wouldn't make a difference. I'm quite content with the monitor/keyboard setup on my desktop and laptop.
I am a motion sickness person from childhood. I have Sony PlayStation PSVR2. Sometimes I get motion sickness in that headset which 1st person games.
But I don’t have this with Vision Pro. For one I primarily use it for productivity and I have not played one game on it yet.
lol, why dont you try it before making such a statement
@@chocktalk Didn't you notice I said I'm quite content with my current setup? And I mentioned dropping prices to realistic levels? There are simply no incentives for me to try one, but I'm not saying anyone should base their buying decisions on my opinions. If you're happy with your AVP then that's what matters.
How fast OLED burn in appear?
0:24 Brother, it's been a thing for a while, like quest 2 and 3
Except Quest 2/3 have extremely limited boring UI. I own a Quest 2 for 2 years and is amazing but the lack of decent softwares are still hindred of how great VR could be
On MaxTech channel the guy just switched to another head strap from the start. Why don't u mention it, usually u do not miss such important details
Cuz they never bought one for a full review. They went to the Apple store for demos.
thank you!!! finally a genuine honest review and not by an apple fanboy who really wants to love vision pro just cause it's apple and also don't want to admit they wasted $4,000
this is the only review i watched. Like the title, no bullshit
Sweetie they're making a commission on Quest 3 affiliate links, pull your head out of your ass
Watching this on an apple Vision Pro. So far no regrets using this as an productivity device
Could you review the Asus Rog Flow x16
I saw what you did there when you were talking about peripheral haha
Love your content. First Gen tech doing first Gen things. I still think it’s different than Meta Quest but I will wait until a personal need surfaces for myself. If it ever surfaces.
I’m surprised Apple doesn’t make you purchase the charger separately.
You know, because Apple wants to be Eco Friendly with their packaging. lol
Their logic is probably more complicated than yours, lol.
Great review!
The Meta Quest 3 allows you to use controllers OR use your hands. Or both. So it's a negative for Apple that they don't come with controllers
yet... It already will work with a playstation controller, so I can see other accessories coming in the future.
@@quentyns a VR motion, controller, and a PlayStation controller is completely different. Motion controllers are an extension of your hands with a user interface.
I think Apple is trying to kill the controller, the way they killed the stylus on iPhones. The way they killed Flash in websites.
The time to get rid of controllers is at the beginning. Vision Pro has eye-tracking from the start. Quest 3 doesn't have eye tracking. When the Quest 4 comes out with eye tracking, most of the compatible apps will not support eye tracking. Quest 3 has hand tracking but a lot of the apps I use on Quest 3 don't support hand tracking. It's going to be a mess.
Controllers are a hazard. Several times I've had to pick up pieces of a controller that went flying through the railing and down to the floor below during a vigorous session of Gorilla Tag. The battery cover pops off on the first bounce, and the battery pops out on the second bounce. Some times the wrist strap also comes off, since it's held in place by the battery cover. The kid should have been wearing the wrist strap. I know all responsible Quest 3 users wear the wrist strap every time. It's not that big of a hassle. It's just a little hassle, but worth it. We always wore the wrist strap with the Wii, after that first unfortunate incident with the vase (or poor Aunt Mary), right?
@@kevinbailey8827 I disagree, but you’re entitled to your opinion. A lot of apps wouldn’t be possible without controllers and controllers to VR isn’t the stylus to a phone, a controller to VR is like a keyboard and mouse to a computer. A controller is a user interface with command inputs. A stylus is a stick you use to touch buttons with. Controllers in VR are also motion controllers, which adds another functionality to the UI. I demoed the vision pro and the latency on the hand tracking is worse than the Quest 3. Which honestly I was looking for that going into the demo because I saw reviews of people playing fruit ninja on the AVP and you can see how bad the latency is. My experience wasn’t terrible, but I also wasn’t playing apps that required me to move my hands fast. I’ve never had issues with controllers flying around, not on my quest 2 or my quest 3. The reason a lot of apps, don’t support hand tracking is because there’s too many inputs on a lot of the Quest games to not have controllers. Not having the controllers as a user interface makes the type of apps you can develop extremely limited. Hand tracking is available on RUclips, your feed, your home screen, the web browser , facebook ect.I use my hand tracking all the time unless I’m playing an game that requires a controller because of things like movement command input and just the overall complexity of some of those games that can’t be done without a controller at this point. I honestly prefer the controllers over the hand tracking for a lot of things. Controllers aren’t going anywhere anytime soon that’s one of the things people are complaining about on the AVP. Apple would first have to put themselves in the position to where they were the dominant force in MR/AR/VR to make industry changes, which definitely isn’t happening with the first generation of the AVP.
i love how the video begins😅
great brave review. Excellent job guys
'experts'
Thanks for your honesty. Yes, early adopters are to be thanked for paying a lot of money for more streamlined and advanced mixed-reality headsets of the future. It seems obvious AVP is not a product for everybody. It really depends on what use cases and disposable cash each individual has. Also what type of face, vision and tolerance for discomfort.
Very True, only a bicycle helmet would help , the helmet could contain a bigger battery and the HUD could come down like those motorbike helmets .
I have the quest 1, 2, 3, psvr, psvr2, and tested the vision pro. The test was very "rollercoaster" like...and wasn't allowed to stray off their predetermined path. With that, I feel a few things:
1. Q3 is really, really good...especially for the price. I think two things could fix this debate: OLED screens (I want OLED for multimedia) with better pixel count (no screen door), and the same apps for multimedia needs on VP. Give me Disney+, a TRUE netflix with 4k, a TRUE youtube with 4k...you get it.
2. Vision Pro is nice in many ways and overpriced in a lot. To me, it was very close to being worth the price IF you are a true Heavy mac computer user, especially with the development of 3rd party dual screens coming out (beta now). I stray here because sometimes I feel it is worth it if you are Heavy into mac computers, but still, that price is a lot. Maybe teh cost of an apple display. VP would be better too if it wasn't metal and weighed a lot less, and lost some of the "cool look" and was more functional on the straps. Its heavy and even I, a heavy VR user, 15 mins in was like..huh, I really feel that. I wasn't able to test with the strap and was going to buy it but literally ran out as I was testing at both locations (prebought on app, then went to demo).
Actually screen of MacBook on vision pro looks like 1080p
love seeing other folks in the video. it’s not just josh anymore
I've learnt this about Apple and it's from the quote you said:
"The AVP is x7 Price of the Meta Quest 3 which gives 90% of what the AVP does."
Apple also sells a cleaning cloth for your iPad:
"The Apple Cleaning Cloth is x5 the cost of a regular screen cleaning cloth which does 99% of what the Apple cleaning cloth does".
iPad? iPad Pro is x4 price of a regular iPad which does 90% of what the Pro does. Same thing.
I actually really like Apple products but the pricing is eye-opening to say the least: Yes they do provide excellent quality but the mark up factor means you need to go for the budget buy or previous generation to knock the price down to be reasonable again. I would like a section of GLASSES that provide multiple screens as alternative to AVP perhaps?
Well their greed got them as a trillion dollar company coz people will buy anything that has that Apple logo regardless of how ludicrous the prices are.
Apple claiming their Vison Pro isn't an AI headset is like me mixing white and gray together and insisting that the end product isn't another shade of gray
Yeah…It’s one of those devices you know is a bad investment once you weigh out the decision. Thank you for the honest review! Are you guys gonna review the new MSI Stealth 18 AI with Core Ultra 9?
honesty is appreciated, this is my experience too.
I like the Vision Pro especially for travel on a plane
Great Review!!
Good dose of reality there, thanks guys 👍🏽. All sounds very sensible. But surely not 10 years off? 5 years max?
Not only does it look stupid but expecting a VR headset oh sorry "spacial computing goggles" to replace a laptop is just stupid, but it's what Apple wants and almost is like what they're marketing it for specifically.
It wiil happen eventually the same way that laptops have replaced desktops, and so on. No one ever thought the iphone would replace the blackberry but it did.
No, its not meant to replace your laptop. Apple is introducing an idea of spacial computing. its an introduction to a new idea and way of doing things. It obviously not a product for mass adoption at this point. Its the worst version that this product will ever be. I think people have unrealistic expectations.
That's sure what apple wants it todo@@GregB011
It can easily replace laptop if you ever have tried one 😂 just compare the teardown of the Quest 2 and laptop
tbh the best thing about this, is that Apple will slowly "normalise" sitting around with a stupid-ass headset on in public. Like they normalised having a pocket computer that can do everything, without looking like a weirdo.
I know that sounds picky, like "you should be able to just enjoy what you want", but once this gets more popular it's just more comfortable to e.g. be sat in an airport and just disconnect the world for an hour of some TV.
The thing I miss when using the Quest 3 is the integration with Apple's ecosystem. Quest 3 may give 90% of the experience, but depending on what you want, 90% may not be enough.
On th other hand, in terms of price, saying that Vision Pro is 7 times the price of Quest 3 misses an important part of Quest 3's value. You can buy one Quest 3 and have the whole family use it (taking turns). Vision Pro is for a single person to use only. It scans your eyes to make sure you're the owner. Guest Mode is okay for demos, but is too cumbersome to use regularly.
You might only use Apple Vision Pro a couple of hours a day. You might only use Quest 3 a couple of hours a day. But if you have a family, they might be also using Quest 3 while Vision Pro sits on a shelf.
Josh I am really looking forward to the T14 series reviews...
Great video!
I have the Vision Pro and I just love it!
That's the most important thing Linda. Everyone's use case is different
Thanks for the first honest review of this thing, which parallels what I’ve been saying about it. Fun toy, but not practical for productivity.
To the average consumer, augmented reality offers little added utility to their everyday lives.
The real benefactors of this product will be the business sector in my opinion.
I would suggest you try another headset. There is a lot of misinformation in this video. I know it's unintentional and more out of ignorance. AR/VR is known as MR(Mixed Reality), and has been done for a long while now. Quest 2 does it and you don't need to hold out controllers far out in front of you. Infact, you can hold it behind you and it still works. Quest 3 is better on almost every front except having a lower res display.
As someone who enjoys VR, and now AR, I have a quest three. I’ve seen the spatial video on that and other experiences. But having tested out the Vision Pro, it just doesn’t so much better the UI/UX experience is phenomenal and so easy and responsive. Right now the quest may have more but the potential vision Pro has far surpasses anything right now
Spatial video on the Quest 3 doesn't seem as "magical" as it does on the Vision Pro. I took some videos with my iPhone 15 at a Six Flags park on Monday. I uploaded them to the Quest 3. It's the first time I've done that and I was disappointed at how "flat" they seemed. You would expect them to seem flat due to how close the two cameras are on an iPhone, but they really pop when I view them on the Vision Pro. Apple is doing something to make them seem more "spatial".
Also, a video of a carousel, where everything is moving (except the camera) was unacceptably jerky on the Quest 3, but played smoothly on the Vision Pro.
I hope the Quest developers figure out how to better display spatial videos on their devices. It's a great option for iPhone 15 Pro users who want to enjoy their spatial videos now, but can't justify the cost of a Vision Pro.
The first ? Have you been living under a rock ?
Finally, an unbaised review by an expert alongside with opinions from others. Well done. Also, when is the Yoga Pro 9i review coming out? Looking forward to it.
Firstly thanks. Review should be out tomorrow :)
@@JustJoshTech Thanks
I agree with u but it is 4 now...
Interesting, their comments about feeling that objects position feel off (and that people feels everything is off and have trouble readjusting their 3D vision). That means that Apple sacrificed accuracy by simply using high-quality cameras and feed them through directly. That also means that Meta's method (using a depth sensor, then combine it with passthrough camera with the depth correcting for the camera offset with respect to where your real eyes sit) is truly going to be the correct method for future VR/AR headsets. Apple wanted to impress with display sharpness, Meta wanted to make sure accuracy and framerate and lack of persistence was executed properly to eliminate discomfort. Meta is the superior technical approach (in terms of raw innovation/technical vision), but Apple polish made them better in the eyes of everyone (for the short term at least, and marketing-wise)
I love an honest review. But common... they did a 20 minute demo. There is better sources of information from people with it in their hand with at least 2 weeks of use. But you know.. ok
I have a Vision Pro and love it. I bought it with the expectation that I’d watch movies with it. For that purpose, it’s awesome. I also edit my RUclips videos in it since it connects to my Mac. And I FaceTime friends and family. Sure, my “persona” looks weird, but it’s simultaneously really impressive. I think the negative reviewers are simply premature to share their thoughts as if Apple doesn’t have much more up there sleeve. And about RUclips not being on it, they’ve already announced that they’re working on an app for the Vision Pro right now. Many MANY more of our favorite apps will follow. Mark my words.
I found the demo super heavy and uncomfortable, how have you made it easier to wear without having neck fatigue?
It's just like the Ipad, a new device for consumption. If they want to attach the PC they need to create something for creating.
I'm not speaking about office and other simple video and photo editing, I'm speaking about actual engineering, analysis, simulation, programming, modeling, serious movie production, VFX ....etc
These are literally the beginning of the Oasis from Ready Player One (sorry, book nerd, had to make the reference)
Great hands-on, as usual. Can't wait your review for the Omen Transcend 14 👍👍
thank the early adoptors for funding the research and development to get apple AR/VR devices to the point they are practical, useful and value for money (that last one might take a while).
Anyone know if watching a video or something on the Apple headset will look better than say a 4k 240hz QD-OLED? Could get two of those gen 3 monitors for less than the cost of the Apple headset. Just curious what is the best investment for my eyes and comfort.
It depends on how you're going to use it. With Vision Pro, that virtual 4K monitor can hover a few feet above your bed, or on the balcony overlooking the beach, or on the moon in a virtual environment as you relax in your coach class seat.
But the answer to your question is no. The virtual 4k screen on Vision Pro will not look better than (or even as good as) a quality physical 4K monitor.
If you're looking at the ONE use case that will justify buying a Vision Pro, you're probably not going to find it. Most people who buy it are going to use it for multiple purposes.
Loving the real, no hype take on these
What exactly do you mean getting fatigued from using a controller? Other headsets controllers barely weigh anything and it's not like you need to hold your arms up constantly to use them if your just going to watch content. What kind of content are you talking about watching...
0:51 "Your Future Ex-Wife" LOL
0:50 - "With your future ex-wife" 🤣🤣🤣
The first device to combine AR and VR?? Uh... even quest 2 has passthru AR.. that's just not true.. quest 3 came out before AVpro and has color AR.. and quest 3 actually has real VR which AVpro doesn't even have.. like what
Thank for your honest, to the point review 👏👏👏
I felt the same way, went to apple store tried it out, walked out and picked up quest 3 at best buy.
Tried out a Porsche. Got a Prius. It's about the destination, not the experience, right?
You were never gonna buy the AVP in the first place 😂😂
@@youtubeviewer4489Lol. Winning comment.
@@youtubeviewer4489 Right, just like the Porsche it's a car that drives. Unlike the Porsche it's a car that drives reliably and economically 😂😉
@@youtubeviewer4489 The Quest 3 is the Porsche, the Vision Pro is one of those hypercars that make insane sacrifices for a tiny bit extra speed.
sure all tech has its lifespan, but keeping it running on battery only, and a proprietary at that, screams "planned obsolescence" really hard.
its a selfish thing one pro or 7 quests get your whole family connected ,the cable battery is bs but it will hopefully wear off like covid
Vision Pro is sort of like an iPad. It's a big iPhone that doesn't even have a phone. It's a small laptop that doesn't even come with a keyboard. The apps it runs aren't as good as the laptop applications. Who would want that?
It turns out many people want it. And some of those people end up getting something else. Why buy one iPad that the kids will fight over when Amazon practically gives away their Fire tablets? Just get one of those for each kid.
Apple still owns the Tablet segment.
Apple doesn't own the headset segment, but we're only a month into the Vision Pro era, and Apple seems to be the one to beat. In the short run, this seems good for Meta, as their Quest 3 is a pretty good product that's much more affordable. Maybe it's good for XReal and some of the others, but they don't get as much mention in reviews of Vision Pro. I guess we'll see in a few years, when Apple has less expensive (but still expensive) options and competitors have options that try to match (or beat) Apple's specs and features.
Here is my prediction for ten years from now:
"Spatial computing is ubiquitous, and it's 100% because of Apple. Nothing any of the also-rans did matters in any significant way."
...will be the narrative that gets debated on the internet.
Your criticism on the passthrough is that FOV isn't as wide, it's not as sharp, etc compared to real life. Are you seriously using your eyes as the standard for pass through comparison ? Love your channel for detailed laptop reviews but it seems you don't have a lot experience with head sets.
I wasn't interested in the Apple Vision before this, but this video certainly got me interested in the Meta Quest LOL
The new girl is cute.
Simp
Great video as usual Josh but to be honest I found it less distracting when only one of You three talk in the video. This transition is not comfortable. I like all of You but let one do the video for his/her own each time.
Loved the comment about shopping for a house with your future ex. And being honest - no fanboy diarrhea here! BRAVO!
I was waiting for Josh! I don't watch other reviewers!
We don’t need a tutorial on AR and VR. Know your audience!!!
I'm glad that I have a technical audience but not all know this!
what about watching movies?
Normally I love your videos but I kept fast forwarding through this (very short) video. Why was so much of the video just a plain description of its features? We can find that info ourselves if we don’t know it already. Do you spend minutes on each laptop review describing how the keys work, how the screen works, and how to use the hinge to open and close it??
in my opinion it doesn't even matter how great it does what it does. If it's heavy/bulky with an external battery pack, people are never going to use it long-term. I think Apple just felt obligated to release something new since their product lines are stagnating.
Tim Cook ruined apple along time ago
Resuming don't waste your money! Apple created this for the Lab rats (for free) this thing's basically a prototype, and they release it publicly because they knew... The fans would buy it. And yeah the proprietary connection again! Finally someone said it thanks Josh! 👍👍👍
holly shit this thing is almost my entire yearly wage!
gotta love capitalism ur money brolly in some swiss bank somewhere or being used to unalive some kids somewhere lol
Im more and more suprised how many team members there are :D
This wouldnt pass with Steve Jobs.
What a scam, I thought is was Just Josh, nobody else. Jokes aside, great video as always!
Considering Apple has had 10 years to look at what other companies are doing, the result of what they're coming up with is incredibly underwhelming. There's a reason everyone's comparing it with the Quest 3 because it's basically the same but with top notch (expensive) displays and cameras. And to have so little software ready at launch is just pathetic. Introducing a completely new product that's going to leave people with a bad after taste is the worst thing a company can do. Even if they'd come up with a much better version in 2 years time, the damage has already been done.
Future ex wife is wild -
Pretty sure josh changed the thumbnail, must be demonitization...
Only thing the changed was the background color btw. Why would it be demonitized?
I’m happy with my Vision Pro and hesitated only slightly with the price. I do wxpext the price to rise for higher end versions as it did for the iPhone. But I imagine people will be happier to buy at the higher prices in a few years ($4 to $6K) simply because the features will be so much more expanded out by then.
Coincidence? By that I mean I visited my local Apple Store today with my eye glass prescription in order to determine if the Apple Vision Pro was compatible with my adjusted eyesight. And when I returned home, I viewed this video review -- because I always enjoy Josh's and the Team's reviews of laptops. But I did notice a few errors and perhaps a bias with the Team's conclusions. For example, at the 4:19 mark, a comment was made that because the AVP lacks native Netflix and RUclips apps, that AVP owners would not be able to view any of Josh's RUclips reviews. That is simply NOT true. I could always watch Netflix and RUclips videos in the AVP's Safari web browser. (By the way, I never watch RUclips videos in a dedicated RUclips app. Grin.) And, bless his soul, your team mate really enjoys his Quest headset and I always respect a person's loyalty and product promotions - whether that loyalty is directed towards a person or for an object he values. But I couldn't help but suspect a fair bit of bias influencing his opinions about the AVP. because of his Quest ownership. I also suspect that for your teammates joining you on your field trip to your local Apple Store, the short time you wore the AVP, it was not equipped with the dual band head strap but only with the single band head strap. Other (if not most) online reviews indicate a much better ergonomic experience using the dual band head strap over longer periods of time. Finally, I don't feel - and I doubt very many others as well - would feel that the AVP will replace a person's laptop as his primary productivity computer of choice. Although the AVP -- IS -- a mobile computer with a unique interface, it won't replace a laptop for the vast majority of tasks a laptop can perform.
Having someone that has experience with AR/VR a headset already and thus does not blindly buy into the hype, does not make them "biased"!
@@SentinelofLogic I appreciate the comment. But you know, I wish your sentiments were always true. I can't recall the thousands of times that I have observed a person really familiar with, - for instance - the Windows/Intel PC ecosystem and then - for instance - tries an Apple Mac for twenty minutes or so will then comment on just how "bad" or "inferior" the Apple Mac ecosystem is. Or vice versa. I am sure you can see the truth behind that hypothetical case. In my experience, familiarity with something - especially something that person enjoys - invariably breeds a negative bias (either small or great) towards a relatively new experience. It is just human nature. That is why most persons I have known are very reluctant to try different foods - for example.
@@SentinelofLogic One more thing. I just viewed an early Apple Vision Pro app demo on RUclips. ruclips.net/video/VZLAKK3PRj4/видео.html. This app will allow the Apple Vision Pro to display one additional external Mac display. It is an early beta app but this only demonstrates that the AVP ecosystem is in its infancy and its will grow very fast. The good thing about the Apple Vision Pro is that the existing first gen hardware is built around a still very powerful Apple Silicon M2 class computer. The AVP sort of reminds me of when the iPhone and iPad were first introduced. Those two products are still around today with a very robust and viable ecosystem of apps and hardware. I suspect that the AVP will follow a similar evolutionary trend.
I bought one 2 days ago. Have no plans on returning it. Thanks Apple for making this exclusive.
Exclusive? It’s already out dated in terms of tech buddy…
Putting my computer, monitor, mouse and keyboard on top of my head instead of putting it on a desk is not my idea of innovation. I have no plans of going to the hospital just because a $3500 gadget strapped on my face caused it.
From the title I thought this was going to be “beyond the bullshit”. Well I’m calling bullshit on them, saying that the phone seemed like it was underwater when trying to grab it with the Apple Vision Pro pass through? I have picked up several items with absolutely no problem with perception. I have even cooked wearing it, chopping vegetables with a very sharp knife. maybe the reviewer needs a set of Zeiss prescription lens inserts.
Your title says beyond the bullS**T but your presenter says it’s the first ar vr headset they have ever seen? Does this mean personally as there are a ton on the market. 🤷♂️
This is shit. There are now a lot of people returning it because of its bill and a lot of stuff that isn’t great.
I woke up today to reports of cracks for no reason on the vision pro a 3.5-5k headset apparently you are entitled and asking for to much according to the apple simps who claim nothing ever works 😅
I hate such devices, they are not practical and no way I am up for wearing this for doing my work or entertainment and mostly making it like as part of life device & way we communicate with people through this(yucckkk). This is so cringe & useless. Apple fans are (every brand biased fans) going to extreme limits to justify the product but honestly if you need to spend money to experience AR/VR, just buy meta quest.
Nice fake “review” to sell meta quest 3.
That is waaaaay over priced. Only an idiot would pay 3.5k for it.
Wow you are sponsored my meta and you make a video stating this as an Apple Vision Pro review but all you did was bash the product.
2
Why isn't there any way to feed it power without needing a battery? Like... can't you just plug it into a power adaptor? o.o
Whatever , it makes a video you get hits Blah blah blah