Your Miranda Warnings (50 Years) - Landmark Cases - Episode # 8

This year (2016) is the fiftieth anniversary of Miranda v. Arizona, a case that outlined the procedural safeguards of the Fifth Amendment. Because of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in this case, a suspect must be given Miranda Warnings if their statements to police are to be used at trial.
Questions and Comments welcome. Thanks for watching.
Subscribe for more videos! / @thinklegalease
New videos are uploaded every 3 days.
Full Cases can be found at: scholar.google.com/scholar_ca...
Definitions:
Issue
- Question the court must answer.
Dissent
- An explicit disagreement by one or more judges with the decision of the majority on a case before them.
Holding
- courts ruling
Affirmed
- declare support, uphold
Certiorari
- order by which a higher court reviews a decision of a lower court
Appeal
- apply to a higher court for a reversal of the decision of a lower court
Lets Connect:
Facebook: Think-LegalE...
Twitter: / thinklegalease
Google+: plus.google.com/b/11709495924...
Email suggested topics to: [e-mail]
The law discussed in this video is general in nature and is not legal advice. This video is purely intended for educational purposes. The video is not intended as a substitute for legal advice. You are highly encouraged to seek professional legal advice in your State should you find yourself dealing with the subject matter of this video. The subject matter is not specific to any individual or State law. The video is published for the sole use of education and it is solely based on the opinions and knowledge of the publisher.
Sources:
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
www.oyez.org/cases/1965/759
www.oyez.org/cases/1963/615
mirandavsarizona1966.weebly.co...
supreme.justia.com/cases/fede...
news.google.com/newspapers?ni...
www.thefreedictionary.com

[@DoesTheNetWork]

Miranda rights only have to be recited if you are a suspect. Not if you are confirmed of doing a crime.

[@a1ntcry1noveru]

Pvt Torres if you are in a custodial interrogation

[@cementer7665]

After watching dozens of interrogations of SUSPECTS, I cannot understand why ANYONE would talk to a badge wearing clown under any circumstances, much less without an attorney present.
BUT, one must be aware of the FACT, that is the accused, and that is exactly what YOU become when the piggies ask to "talk to you", and you agree AFTER demanding an attorney, the badge wearing trash WILL send in one of their own, after dressing him/her up in a suit, to "act" as your counsel, who WILL advise YOU to co-operate.
Law enforcement DOES NOT believe in, nor does it follow the courts' mandates to follow the Constitution.

[@Wsg-kr5pn]

hi