Thank you!! Finally a landscape photographer’s review that is to the point and concise! Not “Let me take you through every single minute of my day, showing brewing coffee, packing bags and hiking while playing depressing folk music and not talking about the lens AT ALL!” like 99.9% of all the other landscape photographers “review” videos out there. This was my lens choice for architectural photography. I love it for all the reasons you mentioned. Compact, light, takes normal filters, affordable. I honestly do not like the external zoom with unlock to use feature, but it does make it even more compact to carry around and with superb performance so I got over it quickly. It feels tight and just weighty enough to feel solid, so I don’t know what other reviewers are talking about when they call it plasticky feeling. Thank you again for such a pointed review! 😃 PS: the main reason I left Nikon years ago was how insanely big and heavy the 14-24 lens was with bulbous element making tons of flare and no filters, and their terrible autofocus. Today’s Z-mount Nikons and lenses are a completely different animal!
I used to have the Nikon d850 with a Tamron 15-30 lens for a lot of my landscape work. Combined weight = 2105 g. I now use the Nikon z7 with the Nikon Z14-30. Combined weight = 1160 g! This and the other advantages of the z-system, made it a no brainer decision for me.
With the 14-30 and now the 24-200 I have an amazing range for landscape in just 2 lightweight lenses, Nikon ave got this right for the landscapers. This is a great real life review James, very refreshing.
How do you like the 24-200? It seems the 24-70 Kit has better edge sharpness. Thought the 24-200 is more of a travel and taking memory photos rather than landscape.
@@coltoncyr2283 for landscapes and travel it's perfect. Depends how many lenses you want to carry around and weight. I bet if I put 2 photos in front of you, the 24-70f4 and the 24-200 you couldn't tell the difference. I don't take the 70-200 2.8 out anymore as too bulky and heavy and not worth any extra quality as negligible
I own this lens for 8 months now... it is exceptional lens..it became my default lens, the weight and size are important for landscape photographers and the sharpness is mind blowing! Add to this the weather sealing and the filter thread!!
Your comments on Astro : landscape ratio spoke to me. I was between the 14-30f4 and the new 14-24f2.8 but this video has helped me decide to go with the f4 (weight, price, performance and compromises as you mentioned). Thanks! Edit: filters! Forgot about that, too
Just in the process of the moving my landscape kit over from a D850 and 14-24 to a Z7 and 14-30. This video helped convince me it was the correct decision. Thanks James!
Great review James just subscribed, I like your style :-) The new Nikon Z 14-30mm at f:8 and f:11 is exactly the same sharpness as the new Z 14-24 2.8 at f:8 and f:11 which is a fact, so if you shoot landscapes mainly with this lens, it is an absolute no brainer! I am selling my Nikon F mount 14-24 2.8 G with its obnoxious 150 filter system set because it can't touch the new Z 14-30 especially with the benefit of the small and very portable 100 Nisi V6 Filter Holder Kit!
I may be wrong James but I think you like it, I agree totally with your full report on the lens. I have had my Z7 for just over 5 weeks and just got the 14-30 2 weeks ago and absolutely love the combination, the quality from both the Z7 and the lens is superb.
What ever gave you the impression I liked the lens? 😉 The 14-30 paired with a Z7 is absolutely superb for landscape shooting - there are not many better options out there full stop
@@JamesBrewphoto I totally agree James, the combination is a real Landscape Power package, I got the D850 like yourself when it came out and loved it, but the Z7 is near perfect especially after all the firmware updates.
Hi, I recently purchased this lens , and I have been reading numerous reviews! Your review is by far the most enlightening. Your enthusiasm and positive words are inspiring me to get practicing…. Thank you so much.
After weeks of searching all the reviews of everything Nikon Z, I think you may have been the one to finally convinced me to make the leap to the Z system. I have some hikes coming up in the California Sierra Nevada and I was debating to stick with my Fuji X or get a GFX50R or be practical and dive all in back to Nikon but tis time with the Z instead of the heavier F mount DSLRs. This 14-30 f4 along with the 24-70 f4 looks to be the perfect backpackers arsenal with the Z7... thank you!
The z7 and the 14-30 & 24-70 f4 is a near perfect landscape photography setup. I just hope they release a lightweight 70-200 or a 24-105 f4 - then it will be perfect 👌
I also have the Z7 & 14-30 f4 and agree fully with every single point that you made. I switched from Fujifilm X and the 10-24 f4 to the Nikon Z system this year and the performance of the Z lens compared to the Fuji is truely astonishing, especially w.r.t. corner sharpness.
No doubt about it, this is one of my favourite lenses. It is absolutely great for landscape photography. I really like the fact that it is so light and can take an 82 mm filter if and when needed.
JAMES! First off, thanks for all your videos as each one is quite helpful in many ways! I’m a NIKON person all the way so I’m very happy to have discovered your RUclipss. I’ve been using the Z-7 since it hit the market and happy as a clam with it. I purchased the Nikon Z14-30 f4 lens a few months after I purchased the body. Everything you have spoken to about the Z14-30 f4 is true, we think alike on this lens for sure. I’ve just ordered the new Z24-120 f4 and can’t wait to receive it! I just photograph landscapes and nature so these two lenses will be perfect for me. I picked up the 14-30 f4 used for $530 USD in perfect condition from a person who wasn’t using it much. What a find!!! Your RUclipss are great, KEEP GOING!!!
This is a VERY useful and thorough review. I am looking into adding a mirror-less camera to my small collection of photography equipment and this lens may be the first S lens I will get. Thank you.
Fantastic review, thank you! Just found out about this lens a couple of days ago. I have the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 I use for real estate interiors, and got fed up having to lug it and the FTZ along, then change to the 24-70 f/4 Z mount for exteriors. This lens does it all, faster and lighter! I shoot landscape for fun too. Although I have the Samyang for once in a blue moon astrophotography, this seems to do that perfectly too from what I've seen. It's also probably the only lens I'll need to bring for a Puerto Rico vacation. Buying it tomorrow!
Thanks for the review. I’m considering purchasing this to replace my 14-24 f/2.8 FX. I don’t get into a lot of astrophotography, so this should serve 90% of my needs with my Z6 along with the 24-200 Z lens.
I'm trying to get all Z lenses and this is the setup I'm thinking. Did you order the 24-200? I'm just worried about it not feeling like a high quality lens.
The 24-200 looks like a nice travel lens but for me on the Z7 I think its too much of a compromise. It just wont be as sharp as the 24-70 in that range - thats not talking down the 24-200, its just physics and lens logic. I'd recommend a 14-30 & 24-70 f4 combo and if you can afford, then get a 24-200 for those days where you need more reach & want to travel light. I'm just using an old 70-200 f4 f mount via the FTZ for now.
I shoot Canon so not the video's target market really. But you raised some very interesting points. Like an F number wider than F4 for landscapes, and not needing IS in lans as you normally use a tripod for landscape.
Knew you would love the Nikon mirrorless lenses, as you say, they get the job done. Glad I purchased this lens. I’ve got my eye on the new 24-200 now, I’m considering replacing my 24-70 f4
What I really hope for is a 24-105 f4 - if Nikon can deliver that in a similar light design that is compatible with the new Z teleconverters, I'll be all over it 👍
James Brew from the reviews I’ve see the the 24-200 is shaping up to be a pretty special lens for landscape photography. The light weight and compact size are very tempting. If it gets the job done I’ll keep it. If I’m not satisfied (and I’m fussy) I’ll sell. Now where can I buy one 🧐
Thanks for such a positive review whilst recognizing that the main purpose when selecting gear is to find the best compromise for your particular shooting needs. I am so tired of all the “big RUclipsrs” that only try to emphasize everything negative about perfectly excellent gear. I have unsubscribed all of them. Keep on the “yes hat” James, I love it.
Great review. Helped me make the decision. I wanted to wait for the 2.8 14 to 24 but I already have a super wide 2.8 that I could use for astro. I like the price point of this lens.
Great review James, I'm definitely eyeing this lens. When I got my Z6II a few weeks ago I also got the Z 50mm 1.8 which is awesome, but I do want to get something wider and this may fit the bill (to go with my adapted 70-200 f4 f-mount lens and my 50).
I also read in reviews, that there must be quite a few decentered copies of the Nikon 14-30mm f4 Z out there. I'm curious how my copy is going to be, that I have ordered today. Thanks for the great review!
Great review, subscribed ☺️ I just got the same lens for my Z6ii, but I think I got a bad copy. Sharpness isn't anything to sing about and the corners, even at f11 are meh. I'm going to ask for an exchange and hopefully the second one will be the real deal!
Thanx, just what I needed to hear. I'm switching to the Z6 or Z7 and one reason is format and weight. Every gram counts when you are out a whole day so a light lens make sense.
Got with my Z6 a few weeks back. Not had much chance at all to work with it yet but I am blown away by the results so far. This lens with the Z6 is a game changer for me. I can see real potential for street photography especially low light combined with IBIS but with C-19 it could be a while before I get to properly test this out. If you have a Z6/7 you should be looking to get this.
Big fan of this lens, it was one of the reasons I went Z for its size, weight an 100mm filters also. Plus it’s sharper than the 14-24 I had, now I use this for landscape and a dedicated astro prime when needed. My back is a lot happier Edit for other users - to my knowledge only the Kase k9 and Nisi V6 are the only holders that have zero vignette with this at 14mm
Thanks so much, great video, I am just a hobbiest, but I have been torn between this lens and the 20 1.8 S. I also just dabble a bit in Astro, but have seen some pretty good stuff in Astro with this lens. You have me leaning towards this lens.
I'm going z6 and 14-30. You've persuaded me. Got a d500 but going with the extra 3 megapixels to full frame experience. Nikon will be pleased with you ha ha! Love all your videos and you're my go to before even Gavin Hardcastle and Adam Gibbs! Thanks, you're a star!
Thanks for the honest information, I have been seriously considering this lens and this has helped me confirm my thoughts about it. I've been wanting a more immersive experience for my adventure videos.
As am43 user (Olympus and now mostly Panasonic) I've been looking at the Z since it came out. I actually told my self before any of the new mirrorless systems were released that I would invest in the first system that were smart enough to release high end lenses with moderate apertures and small size. Nikon has done a marvelous job at this. They, unlike the others, treat their F1.8 primes and F4 zooms as high end professional lenses which makes the system not much larger than m43 with professional lenses. I love my Panasonic but the Z system make so much more sense when I will switch to FF again (still haven't gotten to it though). Larger mount, smaller bodies (up till the S5 was released), small lenses with super high optical constructions, including faster F2.8 and faster primes that are smaller than DSLR lenses by quite a margin. Biggest reason to go with Panasonic would be all the upcoming Sigma lenses but still... Z looks like the way to go. Thanks for a really good review and video! Helps me another step closer to the Z mount. (I do miss my D700).
My travel kit is my Z7II combined with the 24-200s and this 14-30s lens for wide angle. If I need more reach with the 24-200 I can put the Z7II in DX crop mode.
Totally agree with you. I was waiting for the 14-24f2.8s especially because it could accept filters. Latest info for 105mm filters makes this feature totally worthless (though this is a rumour but probably true as it makes sense to have a much bigger filter for the larger lens). I would be better off with my 14mm samyang and my nikkor 20 f1.8s for astro, no need to pay the premium. The focus breathing was also something that I would pay particularly attention but you have confirmed that it is not an issue with the lens, thanks for this. I am totally sold and the order is in the cards!!
You won't be dissapointed - this lens is as good as it gets for a well rounded landscape photography lens. Perfect balance between optical quality, portability, build quality and price 👍
JAMES, thanks for this video, i have de Z6 since two weeks ago and have many doubts, your video makes feel happy to chance to de Z system, great video.
Thanks for the video, you covered everything I needed to know. I have 24-70 F4 Z and its unlock mechanism its little bit annoying but the weight and portability overshadows it completely. :)
Excellent review mate, I’ve just switched over to z7 sold all my Af-s lenses and my amazing D850, it was all about weight for me so with the sales I’ve gone for the Z14 30mm & Z 24 120mm and Z7 camera should do the job for me. Thanks for that very understanding review.
dude those images are awesome 👏 I’m considering getting this wide angle for my Z6, i’ve been using my f mount 20mm but sometimes I want some flexibility when I’m framing a landscape. The earlier 16-35mm has been on my radar for a long time but I’m not very impressed over the shots I get from the 20mm. I think I’m spoiled by sharpness in my 20mm tbh
Chuckled when you said this lens is the reason you jumped from F to Z... I clicked here because I'm thinking of jumping from F to Z to have a lighter kit and specifically this lens. Thank you for the review, very helpful
Thanks for time you took to record this 14-30z lens review, mate. Having just recently made the jump from D850+16-35 myself, I have to agree with you on all points, especially that extra 2mm allowing you a little more wide-angle composition joy. The close focusing of less than 12” is also a bonus. Just ran into your channel, by the way. The excellent quality and your personality made it very easy to click subscribe. Looking forward to more of your videos!
James, just found your site. As an amateur, I thoroughly enjoyed your review of the 14-30. Of course, you further justified my move from the 16-35 when I switched to the Z6 from the D810. Your approach is refreshing-- technical out and real world use by a pro--in. And, clearly you are not one to gratuitously keep lenses that you just don't use. I may be asking too much here, but I would love to see/hear your review of the 24-200 (non-S) lens--if you have this; and how it compares to actual use of the 24-70S and 70-200 f/4 (FF). If I pull the trigger for the 24-200, I will definitely sell my 28-300. Thanks for welcoming me into your world.
Thanks Jon! The 24-200 looks like a nice travel walk around lens but it’s not really one for me as there will definitely be optical compromises that have been made. The 24-70 f4 is likely to outperform it across that range. Plus with a 24-105 and 100-400 on the near horizon both s lenses, those could make for a beautiful combo 👍
Have had the 14-30mm for over six months now, and it's my favourite lens. I use it with my Z6 and have great fun with the new perspective. Being a photographer on a budget i can't afford the fancy F2.8 lenses. But at over a thousand pounds it was still to costly for me, so i took a chance and went gray Market and got it for £780 !! That's a great bargain 👌. I say a "chance " because I saw that some of the lenses had poor lens elements aliment on utube. Think its called Decetering, mine seems fine. 😬 Great video keep it up. 👍
Thanks for review. I’ve always avoided the ultra wide F-mounts from Nikon. My widest being the 20mm 1.8 as it it is light and can take filters. Maybe the 15-30 Z-mount might be the lens to transition me into the Z=mount platform.
Hi, Thanks for a most useful review. Can I ask what was the trouble you were having using the LEE filter system? As far as I can see the NISI v6 cradle fitted with the 100mm filters seems to work in much the same way as the LEE system. Having to purchase a completely new filter system to cater for just one lens is a disincentive to buying the lens. Many thanks, Ian
Grande Recenzione, grande machina, grande obbiettivo.A mio avviso la Z7 con 1l 14-30 è nettamente superiore alla D850 con il 14-24. Un caro saluto dall'Italia Renzo.
Thanks for this video James. I went from crop sensor to full frame last year and I’ve been trying to cut the weight down ever since. I went with the 18-35 over the 16-35 because of weight, I got rid of the 24-120 because I didn’t like the size and weight. I just simply won’t carry my camera if it weighs too much. As a woman pushing 50, I have no desire to carry that kind of weight anymore for miles and killing my back. I’ve been looking at all kinds of alternatives, including The crop Fuji cameras and Micro 4/3 just to try and carry a lighter camera... but I love full frame quality. I haven’t wanted to switch to the Z cameras because although the Z bodies are smaller and lighter than my D750, the available lenses haven’t been, and I’d just have to use my F mount glass anyway. But this lens, coupled with the hopefully upcoming 70-200 f/4, might make me purchase a Z camera. People can complain about the plastic all they want, but to me, plastic = portability. I love my old metal Nikkors, but I’d never carry them on a hike.
My full frame setup has never been lighter since moving to the Z mount. The Z6 or 7 paired with the 14-30 & 24-70 f4 is a really nice setup. Apparently the 24-200 is very good too for those that don't want to have to add a third lens to their bags 👍
Hi James proper real world review thanks any reason you don't keep a quality protection filter on the lens? I am paranoid about scratching the front element of my lenses.
I used to use UV filters but too much faff taking them off all the time to put other filters on. The front glass is pretty tough so as long as I'm careful I'm confident it will be fine (famous last words...😂)
Great review. Have you tried the 14-24mm F2.8 that just came out? I love it, BUT, the ND filters running 50% of the F4 lens may be what would make me return the F2.8 and go with the F4. There's so much you can do in post these days, that F4 is not much of a difference than the F2.8. Yes, for night photography the F2.8 is superb... but like you said Compromise. Edit: 12:48. Eliminate the focus-by-wire issue by going to the SETUP MENU and turn the Save Focus Position to ON. It is OFF by default. This way, you can turn the camera OFF, change lenses, turn it ON again and bing, it kept the focus (yes, even if you remove the lens, turn it off and keep it off for days).
Thanks for watching! No I've not tried the 14-24mm - I hope to get my hands on one soon for a test as I would like to see how it compared to the 14-30. Would make for an interesting lens battle 👍
@@JamesBrewphoto I just returned my 14-24mm F2.8 and bought the 14-30mm F4. 82mm filters! heck yeah. The F4 is good for 90% of my extra wide needs, so I don't feel the loss of the F2.8.
I fully agree with your comments, for landscape photography, F/2.8 is not common. I would be considering the 70-200mm F/2.8 S lens for portrait. A wide angle lens with F/4 is good enough.
The 70-200 2.8 is my favorite portrait lens. I do portraits outdoors rather than in the studio, so 2.8 is a great aperture, and the zoom lets me frame on the fly.
Thanks for the review very helpful. You mentioned that the Lee filter system was not suitable for this lense and you have had to move across to NISI. I have been considering the purchase of a filter system and was veering towards Lee 100 system which appears to be highly acclaimed in online reviews. Your comments though have made me hesitate. Could you elaborate a little on this? Have you been able to use your Lee filters on the NISI system? Thank you
The Lee filter holder creates significant vignettes at wider than 16mm. So its not fit for purpose when shooting with this lens at all. The square 100mm filters are fine and can be used in the Nisi system - so you could always get the Nisi filter holder and Lee filters to go with it. Hope that helps
Just bought a z6ii and loving it. I’m thinking this is going to be my next purchase. Can you tell me if the Kase magnetic filter system will be ok with this lens? Thanks for the great review!
You sure you're not from Nikon? You just sold this lens to me. Hope it goes well with Z6 as well. And I completely agree with you: size, weight and optical quality are the most important factors when it comes to outdoor photography
Very good review. I’m tickled with this lens.Regarding the extension, I think manufacturers sold us on it being bad to sell us lenses. Performance in the field and quality are much more important.
The sunstar though. It's really sad that the newer round bladed lenses loose these nice artistic sunstars the f-mount 20mm had for example. One of the reasons why I will be keeping some f-mounts despite the newer z-mount lenses.
Nice review i would like to see a side by side comparison to my tamron 17-35 which ill do a review on this coming week i think they both have their short comings and areas where they shine
Ive had my Z 14-30 f4 since December 2019. I don't see this as a compromise ultra wide to wide zoom at all. Its everything you want it to be. Its the kitchen sink. Its the perfect combination of performance, size, weight, range, usability and price. Compromise is when you give up something up to gain something else, and usually its an uneven exchange. For a lot more money you can get a little bit more performance with the Z 14-24 f2.8 (just announced). That is a compromise. No screw in filters without an adapter and in return you get slightly less distortion. That is a compromise. Larger size and weight for a 1 stop faster aperture that is mostly not useful in a lens of this zoom range. That is a compromise. And so on. The Z 14-24 f2.8 is the compromise lens. For $50 less (larger discount when these go on sale here shortly) you can get the Z 14-30 f4 and the Z 20 f1.8, and that combination will blow away the Z 14-24 f2.8. Honestly, I don't know why anyone buys the 14-24 f2.8 (and 24-70 f2.8). Too many compromises.
I just framed it as a compromise if absolute perfection is what you are after. But yeah I totally agree - I really don't see the appeal of the 14-24 at all to be honest. The difference in tangible performance benefits between the 14-30 and the 14-24 is not going to warrant the extra cost, weight and bulk imo 👍
@@JamesBrewphoto But that is my point. Overall perfection is the Z 14-30 f4. If you want a little more optical performance and are willing to sacrfice a lot and pay a lot more then get the Z 14-24 f2.8.
@@KungPowEnterFist Compromise isn't a dirty word, and saying that a lens is an optimum compromise is a compliment, not an insult. Compromise just means giving up one aspect to get another. The primary thing you give up with this lens is a wide aperture. That's undeniable, but it's an acceptable loss for the reasons James detailed in the review. I love my 14-30 f/4 due to its low cost and weight, and superb performance. Compromise is not a dirty word!
Great review! I agree with all your points. The 14-30 is a gem of a lens. I see no need for the 14-24 f/2.8. If I need a fast lens for astro photography I will pick up the 20mm 1.8 S.
Interesting to note however that at 14mm you can have a longer shutter speed than 20mm so f4 and 1.8 become almost the same. The wider angle balances out the f4.
Jasper Goodall Correct me if I’m wrong, but using the 300 rule, the 20mm f1.8 (15 secs) lets 4 times as much light in as the f4 at 14mm (20 secs). That difference is significant. However these two combined cost pretty much the same as the upcoming 14-24 f2.8s. I’m so confused haha.
I bought the 14-30mm kit with the Z 6. A very good lens. I also have the 24-70 mm 2.8 S. An absolute top lens. BUT: What about the new 14-24 mm 2.8 S? What do you think? Can we be more than satisfied with the 14-30 mm?
It's probably superior in IQ and build quality, but the 14-30 you save tons of weight size and the filter setup for the 14-30 is unbeatable across any photo company for a wide angle FF. Hard to upgrade to something that may be SLIGHTLY better when you lose some real world practicality as a landscape photographer.
Couldn't agree more Jesse - if we were creating a pros and cons chart for these lens, I feel the 14-30 has the edge overall. I will need to actually use a 14-24 before I can be sure on that though
Hello James, Thank you very much for an awesome review! Answered so many of my questions when I am on the verge of switching to Z mirrorless, and this lens is at the top of my mind. I had one question though, about this lens not having an infinity focus ring. How will I get this lens to focus manually in dark ?
Just bought One today for my Z6 and its taking my landscape photography to another level. Starbursts at f22 is awesome. I thought F4 was a problem but it isn't.
Nice and useful review James. I have one question. I have noticed , that you have on your Nikon Z camera L holder for horizontaly/verticaly shooting. From which producer did you buy this holder? Tom
Panorama vs ultra wide angle lens? Great review! With the exception of moving subjects such as water or rapidly changing light, what is the advantage of a Z7 and 14mm lens vs a Z7 or even a Z6 with a 20mm lens and a three vertical frame panorama? The higher pixel count of the panorama would seem to be an advantage
Thanks! In theory what you suggest can work but I feel it would just prove to be annoying in the long run. The flexibility that the 14-30 gives me makes it more enjoyable to shoot with then wide angle primes imo.
its so simple to decide. get 14-30 f4 for purely landscape as we wont stop down below f11 rarely. get a astro lens separately with both lens sums up far less than the 14-24 f2.8. getting 14-24 f2.8 might look wise but using filter on this lens is pain in the ass. just get 14-30 with very good screw filters.
Thanks for your enthusiastic review. Are you going to buy the Z 14-24 f/2.8S when it arrives - maybe for astro? Do you have the 20mm f/1.8S to review in comparison?
Cheers Geoffrey - no I wont be buying the 14-24 as I just dont see the point given how little astro shooting I do. I don't have the 20mm 1.8 either but that does look nice - given how good the Z lenses are across the board that is bound to be great.
@@JamesBrewphoto Good man, you have standards to maintain for your loyal fans. Although the tough explorer look works. ;) Seriously, looks like you have a good set up with the Z7.
Great review but I'm starting to feel depressed about some of my f-mount lenses, particularly the ultra heavy 24-70mm f2.8E VR which sits on my weighty D850. But I'll have to be patient on future upgrades. Thanks!
@@JamesBrewphoto yeh I did buy it (mid-2019) in a kind of defiant way, the reviews were highly convincing and I wanted another DSLR. But there's plenty of time to wait for new versions of the Z series whilst enjoying the D850. :)
I have the D850 with the 24-70E f/2.8 also, the Z version on a Z camera is beautiful balanced , can’t wait for the z 14 - 24 f2.8 , but I also love the compact nature of the f/4
I hate you. This is the third lens you forced me to buy. Great job, mate.
Thank you!! Finally a landscape photographer’s review that is to the point and concise! Not “Let me take you through every single minute of my day, showing brewing coffee, packing bags and hiking while playing depressing folk music and not talking about the lens AT ALL!” like 99.9% of all the other landscape photographers “review” videos out there.
This was my lens choice for architectural photography. I love it for all the reasons you mentioned. Compact, light, takes normal filters, affordable.
I honestly do not like the external zoom with unlock to use feature, but it does make it even more compact to carry around and with superb performance so I got over it quickly.
It feels tight and just weighty enough to feel solid, so I don’t know what other reviewers are talking about when they call it plasticky feeling.
Thank you again for such a pointed review! 😃
PS: the main reason I left Nikon years ago was how insanely big and heavy the 14-24 lens was with bulbous element making tons of flare and no filters, and their terrible autofocus.
Today’s Z-mount Nikons and lenses are a completely different animal!
I used to have the Nikon d850 with a Tamron 15-30 lens for a lot of my landscape work. Combined weight = 2105 g. I now use the Nikon z7 with the Nikon Z14-30. Combined weight = 1160 g! This and the other advantages of the z-system, made it a no brainer decision for me.
D850 and 14-24. Its brutal compared to my Z50 and Z5 and Z lenses. Really hard to go back. 100% agree.
Sony a7IV+ 16-35 PZ f4 G = 1012g and has the power-zoom vary useful for gimble operation
With the 14-30 and now the 24-200 I have an amazing range for landscape in just 2 lightweight lenses, Nikon ave got this right for the landscapers.
This is a great real life review James, very refreshing.
I will have the same combo next week, when the Z 14-30 arrives. Hopefully it's a good copy. Thank you for the great review, James!
How do you like the 24-200? It seems the 24-70 Kit has better edge sharpness. Thought the 24-200 is more of a travel and taking memory photos rather than landscape.
@@coltoncyr2283 for landscapes and travel it's perfect. Depends how many lenses you want to carry around and weight. I bet if I put 2 photos in front of you, the 24-70f4 and the 24-200 you couldn't tell the difference. I don't take the 70-200 2.8 out anymore as too bulky and heavy and not worth any extra quality as negligible
I own this lens for 8 months now... it is exceptional lens..it became my default lens, the weight and size are important for landscape photographers and the sharpness is mind blowing! Add to this the weather sealing and the filter thread!!
For me its pretty much perfect for landscape photographers 👌
@@JamesBrewphoto It is a must for landscape photographers using Z mount. Also it is better for weight and budget than the upcoming F 2.8
After watching your review I bought one for myself. Its amazing.
Everything you just said about this lens also applies to real estate photography, which is my primary use case for it. Thanks for this great review.
I love your videos and I’m happy you are with Nikon!
I'm buying one on this review. Superb benefits as a landscape photographer. Brilliant.
Very glad you're happy with the new lens James, hope your loving the "Z" camera as much as I am.
Overall I am - its not perfect but overall I'm really pleased. I will do a Z7 review in a few weeks time 👍
For years I swore by my AF-S 14-24, but I am really anxious to use the 14-30 S in the same manner (minus the physical exercise). LOL.
a hell of a review
Your comments on Astro : landscape ratio spoke to me. I was between the 14-30f4 and the new 14-24f2.8 but this video has helped me decide to go with the f4 (weight, price, performance and compromises as you mentioned). Thanks!
Edit: filters! Forgot about that, too
Just in the process of the moving my landscape kit over from a D850 and 14-24 to a Z7 and 14-30. This video helped convince me it was the correct decision. Thanks James!
Great review,even though I am not a mirrorless fan. Brilliantly done
Great review James just subscribed, I like your style :-) The new Nikon Z 14-30mm at f:8 and f:11 is exactly the same sharpness as the new Z 14-24 2.8 at f:8 and f:11 which is a fact, so if you shoot landscapes mainly with this lens, it is an absolute no brainer! I am selling my Nikon F mount 14-24 2.8 G with its obnoxious 150 filter system set because it can't touch the new Z 14-30 especially with the benefit of the small and very portable 100 Nisi V6 Filter Holder Kit!
I may be wrong James but I think you like it, I agree totally with your full report on the lens.
I have had my Z7 for just over 5 weeks and just got the 14-30 2 weeks ago and absolutely love the combination, the quality from both the Z7 and the lens is superb.
What ever gave you the impression I liked the lens? 😉 The 14-30 paired with a Z7 is absolutely superb for landscape shooting - there are not many better options out there full stop
@@JamesBrewphoto I totally agree James, the combination is a real Landscape Power package, I got the D850 like yourself when it came out and loved it, but the Z7 is near perfect especially after all the firmware updates.
Hi,
I recently purchased this lens , and I have been reading numerous reviews! Your review is by far the most enlightening. Your enthusiasm and positive words are inspiring me to get practicing…. Thank you so much.
Ok. I'm sold. Going to Best Buy right now. Thanks James
I love the enthusiasm in this review! I got the 14-30 on my Z6.
I was expecting photographs, but you have explained well.
After weeks of searching all the reviews of everything Nikon Z, I think you may have been the one to finally convinced me to make the leap to the Z system. I have some hikes coming up in the California Sierra Nevada and I was debating to stick with my Fuji X or get a GFX50R or be practical and dive all in back to Nikon but tis time with the Z instead of the heavier F mount DSLRs.
This 14-30 f4 along with the 24-70 f4 looks to be the perfect backpackers arsenal with the Z7... thank you!
The z7 and the 14-30 & 24-70 f4 is a near perfect landscape photography setup. I just hope they release a lightweight 70-200 or a 24-105 f4 - then it will be perfect 👌
I also have the Z7 & 14-30 f4 and agree fully with every single point that you made. I switched from Fujifilm X and the 10-24 f4 to the Nikon Z system this year and the performance of the Z lens compared to the Fuji is truely astonishing, especially w.r.t. corner sharpness.
No doubt about it, this is one of my favourite lenses. It is absolutely great for landscape photography. I really like the fact that it is so light and can take an 82 mm filter if and when needed.
JAMES! First off, thanks for all your videos as each one is quite helpful in many ways!
I’m a NIKON person all the way so I’m very happy to have discovered your RUclipss.
I’ve been using the Z-7 since it hit the market and happy as a clam with it.
I purchased the Nikon Z14-30 f4 lens a few months after I purchased the body. Everything you have spoken to about the Z14-30 f4 is true, we think alike on this lens for sure.
I’ve just ordered the new Z24-120 f4 and can’t wait to receive it! I just photograph landscapes and nature so these two lenses will be perfect for me. I picked up the 14-30 f4 used for $530 USD in perfect condition from a person who wasn’t using it much. What a find!!! Your RUclipss are great, KEEP GOING!!!
This is a VERY useful and thorough review. I am looking into adding a mirror-less camera to my small collection of photography equipment and this lens may be the first S lens I will get. Thank you.
The most comprehensive review that I've seen of this lens. I've just got a Z9 and I think you've persuaded me to buy this lens
Fantastic review, thank you! Just found out about this lens a couple of days ago. I have the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 I use for real estate interiors, and got fed up having to lug it and the FTZ along, then change to the 24-70 f/4 Z mount for exteriors. This lens does it all, faster and lighter! I shoot landscape for fun too. Although I have the Samyang for once in a blue moon astrophotography, this seems to do that perfectly too from what I've seen. It's also probably the only lens I'll need to bring for a Puerto Rico vacation. Buying it tomorrow!
Very much enjoyed your review. .. oh dear, I fear another purchase is looming. Appreciate your style of delivery, open and honest without the frills!
Thanks for the review. I’m considering purchasing this to replace my 14-24 f/2.8 FX. I don’t get into a lot of astrophotography, so this should serve 90% of my needs with my Z6 along with the 24-200 Z lens.
I'm trying to get all Z lenses and this is the setup I'm thinking. Did you order the 24-200? I'm just worried about it not feeling like a high quality lens.
The 24-200 looks like a nice travel lens but for me on the Z7 I think its too much of a compromise. It just wont be as sharp as the 24-70 in that range - thats not talking down the 24-200, its just physics and lens logic. I'd recommend a 14-30 & 24-70 f4 combo and if you can afford, then get a 24-200 for those days where you need more reach & want to travel light. I'm just using an old 70-200 f4 f mount via the FTZ for now.
I shoot Canon so not the video's target market really. But you raised some very interesting points. Like an F number wider than F4 for landscapes, and not needing IS in lans as you normally use a tripod for landscape.
Glad there was some useful info in there for those over on the dark side 😉
Knew you would love the Nikon mirrorless lenses, as you say, they get the job done. Glad I purchased this lens. I’ve got my eye on the new 24-200 now, I’m considering replacing my 24-70 f4
What I really hope for is a 24-105 f4 - if Nikon can deliver that in a similar light design that is compatible with the new Z teleconverters, I'll be all over it 👍
James Brew from the reviews I’ve see the the 24-200 is shaping up to be a pretty special lens for landscape photography. The light weight and compact size are very tempting. If it gets the job done I’ll keep it. If I’m not satisfied (and I’m fussy) I’ll sell. Now where can I buy one 🧐
Thanks for such a positive review whilst recognizing that the main purpose when selecting gear is to find the best compromise for your particular shooting needs. I am so tired of all the “big RUclipsrs” that only try to emphasize everything negative about perfectly excellent gear. I have unsubscribed all of them. Keep on the “yes hat” James, I love it.
Thanks Charlotte 🙂
Great review. Helped me make the decision. I wanted to wait for the 2.8 14 to 24 but I already have a super wide 2.8 that I could use for astro. I like the price point of this lens.
Great review James, I'm definitely eyeing this lens. When I got my Z6II a few weeks ago I also got the Z 50mm 1.8 which is awesome, but I do want to get something wider and this may fit the bill (to go with my adapted 70-200 f4 f-mount lens and my 50).
I also read in reviews, that there must be quite a few decentered copies of the Nikon 14-30mm f4 Z out there. I'm curious how my copy is going to be, that I have ordered today. Thanks for the great review!
Great review, subscribed ☺️ I just got the same lens for my Z6ii, but I think I got a bad copy. Sharpness isn't anything to sing about and the corners, even at f11 are meh. I'm going to ask for an exchange and hopefully the second one will be the real deal!
Really enjoyed your flog & honest review of this little but amazing lens.
Thanx, just what I needed to hear. I'm switching to the Z6 or Z7 and one reason is format and weight. Every gram counts when you are out a whole day so a light lens make sense.
Got with my Z6 a few weeks back. Not had much chance at all to work with it yet but I am blown away by the results so far. This lens with the Z6 is a game changer for me. I can see real potential for street photography especially low light combined with IBIS but with C-19 it could be a while before I get to properly test this out. If you have a Z6/7 you should be looking to get this.
I completely agree - I feel this lens really is incredibly compelling. Many naysayers are those that haven't actually tried it
Big fan of this lens, it was one of the reasons I went Z for its size, weight an 100mm filters also. Plus it’s sharper than the 14-24 I had, now I use this for landscape and a dedicated astro prime when needed. My back is a lot happier
Edit for other users - to my knowledge only the Kase k9 and Nisi V6 are the only holders that have zero vignette with this at 14mm
Half of my budget will now go to the iPhone 12 Pro Max so that's the end of the 14-24 for me.
My 82mm Kase Wolverine does vignette with one filter on this lens but zooming to 15mm fixes that.
Thanks so much, great video, I am just a hobbiest, but I have been torn between this lens and the 20 1.8 S. I also just dabble a bit in Astro, but have seen some pretty good stuff in Astro with this lens. You have me leaning towards this lens.
Getting the Z6 with 24-70 f4, definitely will be adding this to the kit. Now if only we can get a 70-200 f4 or 100-400
Thank you for an informative review. I recently purchased this lens for $600.00 on a clearance sale. I find everything you mentioned to be 100% true.
I'm going z6 and 14-30.
You've persuaded me.
Got a d500 but going with the extra 3 megapixels to full frame experience.
Nikon will be pleased with you ha ha!
Love all your videos and you're my go to before even Gavin Hardcastle and Adam Gibbs!
Thanks, you're a star!
Excellent choice! I wish you all the best with your new gear. Thanks very much, that is very kind of you to say 🙂
Thanks for the honest information, I have been seriously considering this lens and this has helped me confirm my thoughts about it. I've been wanting a more immersive experience for my adventure videos.
As am43 user (Olympus and now mostly Panasonic) I've been looking at the Z since it came out. I actually told my self before any of the new mirrorless systems were released that I would invest in the first system that were smart enough to release high end lenses with moderate apertures and small size. Nikon has done a marvelous job at this. They, unlike the others, treat their F1.8 primes and F4 zooms as high end professional lenses which makes the system not much larger than m43 with professional lenses. I love my Panasonic but the Z system make so much more sense when I will switch to FF again (still haven't gotten to it though). Larger mount, smaller bodies (up till the S5 was released), small lenses with super high optical constructions, including faster F2.8 and faster primes that are smaller than DSLR lenses by quite a margin. Biggest reason to go with Panasonic would be all the upcoming Sigma lenses but still... Z looks like the way to go. Thanks for a really good review and video! Helps me another step closer to the Z mount. (I do miss my D700).
Thank you, James, for this brilliant review. You just sold the lens to me! Subscribed!
cheers for this video! love this lens!
My travel kit is my Z7II combined with the 24-200s and this 14-30s lens for wide angle. If I need more reach with the 24-200 I can put the Z7II in DX crop mode.
Totally agree with you. I was waiting for the 14-24f2.8s especially because it could accept filters. Latest info for 105mm filters makes this feature totally worthless (though this is a rumour but probably true as it makes sense to have a much bigger filter for the larger lens). I would be better off with my 14mm samyang and my nikkor 20 f1.8s for astro, no need to pay the premium. The focus breathing was also something that I would pay particularly attention but you have confirmed that it is not an issue with the lens, thanks for this. I am totally sold and the order is in the cards!!
You won't be dissapointed - this lens is as good as it gets for a well rounded landscape photography lens. Perfect balance between optical quality, portability, build quality and price 👍
Nice review. 😊Thank u 🙏
JAMES, thanks for this video, i have de Z6 since two weeks ago and have many doubts, your video makes feel happy to chance to de Z system, great video.
Thanks for the video, you covered everything I needed to know. I have 24-70 F4 Z and its unlock mechanism its little bit annoying but the weight and portability overshadows it completely. :)
Excellent review mate, I’ve just switched over to z7 sold all my Af-s lenses and my amazing D850, it was all about weight for me so with the sales I’ve gone for the Z14 30mm & Z 24 120mm and Z7 camera should do the job for me. Thanks for that very understanding review.
Maaan, I’ve never seen anyone praised a photography gear this much. Looks like you are going to marry this 14-30.
He will rather get money upon divorcing this lens, than losing in alimony.
Thanks for the review. Will it be good for Z5 ?
Is a great optic !!! In my bag !! beautiful video congrats, By
dude those images are awesome 👏
I’m considering getting this wide angle for my Z6, i’ve been using my f mount 20mm but sometimes I want some flexibility when I’m framing a landscape. The earlier 16-35mm has been on my radar for a long time but I’m not very impressed over the shots I get from the 20mm. I think I’m spoiled by sharpness in my 20mm tbh
Chuckled when you said this lens is the reason you jumped from F to Z... I clicked here because I'm thinking of jumping from F to Z to have a lighter kit and specifically this lens. Thank you for the review, very helpful
Thanks for time you took to record this 14-30z lens review, mate. Having just recently made the jump from D850+16-35 myself, I have to agree with you on all points, especially that extra 2mm allowing you a little more wide-angle composition joy. The close focusing of less than 12” is also a bonus. Just ran into your channel, by the way. The excellent quality and your personality made it very easy to click subscribe. Looking forward to more of your videos!
Thanks very much Colin 🙏
Really nice review. Thanks.
James, just found your site. As an amateur, I thoroughly enjoyed your review of the 14-30. Of course, you further justified my move from the 16-35 when I switched to the Z6 from the D810.
Your approach is refreshing-- technical out and real world use by a pro--in. And, clearly you are not one to gratuitously keep lenses that you just don't use.
I may be asking too much here, but I would love to see/hear your review of the 24-200 (non-S) lens--if you have this; and how it compares to actual use of the 24-70S and 70-200 f/4 (FF). If I pull the trigger for the 24-200, I will definitely sell my 28-300. Thanks for welcoming me into your world.
Thanks Jon! The 24-200 looks like a nice travel walk around lens but it’s not really one for me as there will definitely be optical compromises that have been made. The 24-70 f4 is likely to outperform it across that range. Plus with a 24-105 and 100-400 on the near horizon both s lenses, those could make for a beautiful combo 👍
@@JamesBrewphoto Thanks James!
Excellent video James!
Have had the 14-30mm for over six months now, and it's my favourite lens. I use it with my Z6 and have great fun with the new perspective.
Being a photographer on a budget i can't afford the fancy F2.8 lenses. But at over a thousand pounds it was still to costly for me, so i took a chance and went gray Market and got it for £780 !!
That's a great bargain 👌. I say a "chance " because I saw that some of the lenses had poor lens elements aliment on utube. Think its called Decetering, mine seems fine. 😬
Great video keep it up. 👍
Good one James. I'm convinced. Top of my wish list to add to my already awesome z7.
Thanks for review. I’ve always avoided the ultra wide F-mounts from Nikon. My widest being the 20mm 1.8 as it it is light and can take filters. Maybe the 15-30 Z-mount might be the lens to transition me into the Z=mount platform.
I agree completely. I don't need 2.8. I haven't used the inner ring. Need to research that.
This lens, and the 24-70/4, is one of the best reasons to chose the Nikon Z system. The are really good, and not to big and heavy. A hikers dream
Absolutely - many of the positives I covered in this review equally apply to the 24-70 f4
Hi, Thanks for a most useful review. Can I ask what was the trouble you were having using the LEE filter system? As far as I can see the NISI v6 cradle fitted with the 100mm filters seems to work in much the same way as the LEE system. Having to purchase a completely new filter system to cater for just one lens is a disincentive to buying the lens. Many thanks, Ian
Grande Recenzione, grande machina, grande obbiettivo.A mio avviso la Z7 con 1l 14-30 è nettamente superiore alla D850 con il 14-24. Un caro saluto dall'Italia Renzo.
Thanks for this video James. I went from crop sensor to full frame last year and I’ve been trying to cut the weight down ever since. I went with the 18-35 over the 16-35 because of weight, I got rid of the 24-120 because I didn’t like the size and weight. I just simply won’t carry my camera if it weighs too much. As a woman pushing 50, I have no desire to carry that kind of weight anymore for miles and killing my back. I’ve been looking at all kinds of alternatives, including The crop Fuji cameras and Micro 4/3 just to try and carry a lighter camera... but I love full frame quality. I haven’t wanted to switch to the Z cameras because although the Z bodies are smaller and lighter than my D750, the available lenses haven’t been, and I’d just have to use my F mount glass anyway. But this lens, coupled with the hopefully upcoming 70-200 f/4, might make me purchase a Z camera.
People can complain about the plastic all they want, but to me, plastic = portability. I love my old metal Nikkors, but I’d never carry them on a hike.
My full frame setup has never been lighter since moving to the Z mount. The Z6 or 7 paired with the 14-30 & 24-70 f4 is a really nice setup. Apparently the 24-200 is very good too for those that don't want to have to add a third lens to their bags 👍
Hi James proper real world review thanks any reason you don't keep a quality protection filter on the lens? I am paranoid about scratching the front element of my lenses.
I used to use UV filters but too much faff taking them off all the time to put other filters on. The front glass is pretty tough so as long as I'm careful I'm confident it will be fine (famous last words...😂)
mi é piaciuto il test di questo obbiettivo sul mondo reale,mi hai trasmesso entusiasmo,grazie.
Great review. Have you tried the 14-24mm F2.8 that just came out? I love it, BUT, the ND filters running 50% of the F4 lens may be what would make me return the F2.8 and go with the F4. There's so much you can do in post these days, that F4 is not much of a difference than the F2.8. Yes, for night photography the F2.8 is superb... but like you said Compromise.
Edit: 12:48. Eliminate the focus-by-wire issue by going to the SETUP MENU and turn the Save Focus Position to ON. It is OFF by default. This way, you can turn the camera OFF, change lenses, turn it ON again and bing, it kept the focus (yes, even if you remove the lens, turn it off and keep it off for days).
Thanks for watching! No I've not tried the 14-24mm - I hope to get my hands on one soon for a test as I would like to see how it compared to the 14-30. Would make for an interesting lens battle 👍
@@JamesBrewphoto I just returned my 14-24mm F2.8 and bought the 14-30mm F4. 82mm filters! heck yeah. The F4 is good for 90% of my extra wide needs, so I don't feel the loss of the F2.8.
I fully agree with your comments, for landscape photography, F/2.8 is not common. I would be considering the 70-200mm F/2.8 S lens for portrait. A wide angle lens with F/4 is good enough.
The 70-200 2.8 is my favorite portrait lens. I do portraits outdoors rather than in the studio, so 2.8 is a great aperture, and the zoom lets me frame on the fly.
Thanks for the review very helpful. You mentioned that the Lee filter system was not suitable for this lense and you have had to move across to NISI. I have been considering the purchase of a filter system and was veering towards Lee 100 system which appears to be highly acclaimed in online reviews. Your comments though have made me hesitate. Could you elaborate a little on this? Have you been able to use your Lee filters on the NISI system? Thank you
The Lee filter holder creates significant vignettes at wider than 16mm. So its not fit for purpose when shooting with this lens at all. The square 100mm filters are fine and can be used in the Nisi system - so you could always get the Nisi filter holder and Lee filters to go with it. Hope that helps
@@JamesBrewphoto Thanks for your comments
Just bought a z6ii and loving it. I’m thinking this is going to be my next purchase. Can you tell me if the Kase magnetic filter system will be ok with this lens?
Thanks for the great review!
Yes get the 95mm filters
You sure you're not from Nikon? You just sold this lens to me. Hope it goes well with Z6 as well. And I completely agree with you: size, weight and optical quality are the most important factors when it comes to outdoor photography
Haha I should be on commission from Nikon really 😂 Happy shooting!
Very good review. I’m tickled with this lens.Regarding the extension, I think manufacturers sold us on it being bad to sell us lenses. Performance in the field and quality are much more important.
Damn-it! Now I want this lens.
No, I actually need it to make a living. :-(
The sunstar though. It's really sad that the newer round bladed lenses loose these nice artistic sunstars the f-mount 20mm had for example. One of the reasons why I will be keeping some f-mounts despite the newer z-mount lenses.
Really liked this video. Can you compare it to the new z 14-24 2.8?
Cheers! I've not used the new 14-24 S and am unlikely to do so any time soon unfortunately
Oh wow James ..Just what I have ..I have so many questions so let me see the video first
Nice review i would like to see a side by side comparison to my tamron 17-35 which ill do a review on this coming week i think they both have their short comings and areas where they shine
Thanks Joseph 👍
Ive had my Z 14-30 f4 since December 2019. I don't see this as a compromise ultra wide to wide zoom at all. Its everything you want it to be. Its the kitchen sink. Its the perfect combination of performance, size, weight, range, usability and price. Compromise is when you give up something up to gain something else, and usually its an uneven exchange. For a lot more money you can get a little bit more performance with the Z 14-24 f2.8 (just announced). That is a compromise. No screw in filters without an adapter and in return you get slightly less distortion. That is a compromise. Larger size and weight for a 1 stop faster aperture that is mostly not useful in a lens of this zoom range. That is a compromise. And so on. The Z 14-24 f2.8 is the compromise lens. For $50 less (larger discount when these go on sale here shortly) you can get the Z 14-30 f4 and the Z 20 f1.8, and that combination will blow away the Z 14-24 f2.8. Honestly, I don't know why anyone buys the 14-24 f2.8 (and 24-70 f2.8). Too many compromises.
I just framed it as a compromise if absolute perfection is what you are after. But yeah I totally agree - I really don't see the appeal of the 14-24 at all to be honest. The difference in tangible performance benefits between the 14-30 and the 14-24 is not going to warrant the extra cost, weight and bulk imo 👍
@@JamesBrewphoto But that is my point. Overall perfection is the Z 14-30 f4. If you want a little more optical performance and are willing to sacrfice a lot and pay a lot more then get the Z 14-24 f2.8.
@@KungPowEnterFist Compromise isn't a dirty word, and saying that a lens is an optimum compromise is a compliment, not an insult. Compromise just means giving up one aspect to get another.
The primary thing you give up with this lens is a wide aperture. That's undeniable, but it's an acceptable loss for the reasons James detailed in the review. I love my 14-30 f/4 due to its low cost and weight, and superb performance.
Compromise is not a dirty word!
Great review! I agree with all your points. The 14-30 is a gem of a lens. I see no need for the 14-24 f/2.8. If I need a fast lens for astro photography I will pick up the 20mm 1.8 S.
Interesting to note however that at 14mm you can have a longer shutter speed than 20mm so f4 and 1.8 become almost the same. The wider angle balances out the f4.
Jasper Goodall Correct me if I’m wrong, but using the 300 rule, the 20mm f1.8 (15 secs) lets 4 times as much light in as the f4 at 14mm (20 secs). That difference is significant. However these two combined cost pretty much the same as the upcoming 14-24 f2.8s. I’m so confused haha.
I bought the 14-30mm kit with the Z 6. A very good lens. I also have the 24-70 mm 2.8 S. An absolute top lens. BUT: What about the new 14-24 mm 2.8 S? What do you think? Can we be more than satisfied with the 14-30 mm?
It's probably superior in IQ and build quality, but the 14-30 you save tons of weight size and the filter setup for the 14-30 is unbeatable across any photo company for a wide angle FF. Hard to upgrade to something that may be SLIGHTLY better when you lose some real world practicality as a landscape photographer.
Couldn't agree more Jesse - if we were creating a pros and cons chart for these lens, I feel the 14-30 has the edge overall. I will need to actually use a 14-24 before I can be sure on that though
Hello James, Thank you very much for an awesome review! Answered so many of my questions when I am on the verge of switching to Z mirrorless, and this lens is at the top of my mind. I had one question though, about this lens not having an infinity focus ring. How will I get this lens to focus manually in dark ?
Just bought One today for my Z6 and its taking my landscape photography to another level.
Starbursts at f22 is awesome.
I thought F4 was a problem but it isn't.
Nice and useful review James. I have one question. I have noticed , that you have on your Nikon Z camera L holder for horizontaly/verticaly shooting. From which producer did you buy this holder? Tom
Thanks! Its called the Zelda by 3 legged thing
James Brew Thanks too! I have just bought similar one, it si useful thing.
Panorama vs ultra wide angle lens? Great review! With the exception of moving subjects such as water or rapidly changing light, what is the advantage of a Z7 and 14mm lens vs a Z7 or even a Z6 with a 20mm lens and a three vertical frame panorama? The higher pixel count of the panorama would seem to be an advantage
Thanks! In theory what you suggest can work but I feel it would just prove to be annoying in the long run. The flexibility that the 14-30 gives me makes it more enjoyable to shoot with then wide angle primes imo.
Great review thanks. Are you related to Thomas Heaton ?
Yes I'm his far less successful cousin 😉
its so simple to decide. get 14-30 f4 for purely landscape as we wont stop down below f11 rarely. get a astro lens separately with both lens sums up far less than the 14-24 f2.8. getting 14-24 f2.8 might look wise but using filter on this lens is pain in the ass. just get 14-30 with very good screw filters.
Enjoy your videos. Does this lens pair well with the z5?
Cheers! I haven't used the Z5 but I see no reason why not - this lens will work well on any of the Z cameras
"Focus Stacking Beast", minimum weight, weather sealed. What else could you ask for, I just wish it was for L-mount. Thanks.
Very helpful indeed. Thanks!
Brought it now, very nice indews
Thanks for your enthusiastic review. Are you going to buy the Z 14-24 f/2.8S when it arrives - maybe for astro? Do you have the 20mm f/1.8S to review in comparison?
Cheers Geoffrey - no I wont be buying the 14-24 as I just dont see the point given how little astro shooting I do. I don't have the 20mm 1.8 either but that does look nice - given how good the Z lenses are across the board that is bound to be great.
Glad to see you enjoying your gear, there are good beard trimmers on the market. ;)
Haha! I am pleased to report the trimmer has been used and the beard is now under control 😂
@@JamesBrewphoto Good man, you have standards to maintain for your loyal fans. Although the tough explorer look works. ;)
Seriously, looks like you have a good set up with the Z7.
Great review but I'm starting to feel depressed about some of my f-mount lenses, particularly the ultra heavy 24-70mm f2.8E VR which sits on my weighty D850. But I'll have to be patient on future upgrades. Thanks!
Thanks Evan - haha don't. The d850 is still possibly the best camera ever made imo 👍
Evan B_ sell your old gear and invest in the Z mount system, you won’t regret it, and it will get rid of that depression for sure
@@JamesBrewphoto yeh I did buy it (mid-2019) in a kind of defiant way, the reviews were highly convincing and I wanted another DSLR. But there's plenty of time to wait for new versions of the Z series whilst enjoying the D850. :)
I have the D850 with the 24-70E f/2.8 also, the Z version on a Z camera is beautiful balanced , can’t wait for the z 14 - 24 f2.8 , but I also love the compact nature of the f/4