What they didn't mention is that the XREAL Ultra is much easier to wear and walk around outside. They're also a fraction of the weight of Vision Pro and really designed for work instead of just play. It's true that the tech is a bit better on the Vision Pro but with the size of the goggles, it just fits more, but this doesn't change the fact that it is really a VR set, whereas XREAL is the only true AR with these capabilities out there. I've seen the reviews of people who have tried both and they almost all agree that Vision Pro is great for using indoors for a couple of hours at a time before head weight fatigue sets in, whereas XREAL can be worn for much longer and used for actual work. In my opinion, XREAL is where Vision Pro wants to be in future iterations but by they time the get there, XREAL will be a eons ahead of the game just as Samsung S24 Ultra is compared to the latest iphone. I'm going with XREAL.
But Apple doesn't of compare it's huge,Xreal you can wear them as sun glasses,apple you can't wear like sun glasses they are not the same apple is VR Xreal is AR.
Just ordered the Xreal Air 2 Pro, very excited to try them out. The launch of the Vision Pro has sparked a lot of spacial computing hype, but I've realized the solution I'd most desire already exists at a fraction of the cost. I don't particularly care to have hand movement tracking or much interaction, so something that's $400-$600 and gives me three massive virtual screens in front of my face is really all I could ask for. I can't stand wearing my son's Meta Quest for longer than 10 minutes, so it's really great that a much more practical solution exists.
![AR Glasses 'XREAL Air 2 Ultra' Review: Hand-Tracking MR [Smart Glasses]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vEkhcpvQIUk/mqdefault.jpg)
What they didn't mention is that the XREAL Ultra is much easier to wear and walk around outside. They're also a fraction of the weight of Vision Pro and really designed for work instead of just play. It's true that the tech is a bit better on the Vision Pro but with the size of the goggles, it just fits more, but this doesn't change the fact that it is really a VR set, whereas XREAL is the only true AR with these capabilities out there. I've seen the reviews of people who have tried both and they almost all agree that Vision Pro is great for using indoors for a couple of hours at a time before head weight fatigue sets in, whereas XREAL can be worn for much longer and used for actual work. In my opinion, XREAL is where Vision Pro wants to be in future iterations but by they time the get there, XREAL will be a eons ahead of the game just as Samsung S24 Ultra is compared to the latest iphone. I'm going with XREAL.
Thanks for sharing your insights! Sounds like XREAL is a great choice for practicality and comfort. Enjoy your experience with them! 👍
But Apple doesn't of compare it's huge,Xreal you can wear them as sun glasses,apple you can't wear like sun glasses they are not the same apple is VR Xreal is AR.
Just ordered the Xreal Air 2 Pro, very excited to try them out. The launch of the Vision Pro has sparked a lot of spacial computing hype, but I've realized the solution I'd most desire already exists at a fraction of the cost. I don't particularly care to have hand movement tracking or much interaction, so something that's $400-$600 and gives me three massive virtual screens in front of my face is really all I could ask for. I can't stand wearing my son's Meta Quest for longer than 10 minutes, so it's really great that a much more practical solution exists.
Sounds perfect! Enjoy! 🙌👍