513. Should Public Transit Be Free? (Update) | Freakonomics Radio
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
- It boosts economic opportunity and social mobility. It’s good for the environment. So why do we charge people to use it? The short answer: it’s complicated. Also: We talk to the man who gets half the nation’s mass-transit riders where they want to go (most of the time).
FOLLOW FREAKONOMICS RADIO:
RUclips: freak.ws/3yIl6dl
Apple Podcasts: freak.ws/3yAvQh0
Spotify: freak.ws/3TsdCmV
ABOUT FREAKONOMICS RADIO:
Discover the hidden side of everything with host Stephen J. Dubner, co-author of the Freakonomics books. Each week, Dubner speaks with Nobel laureates and provocateurs, intellectuals and entrepreneurs, and various other underachievers to uncover things you always thought you knew (but didn’t) and things you never thought you wanted to know (but do) - from the economics of sleep to the future of education, from markets for marriage to the surprising utility of wolves.
ABOUT THE FREAKONOMICS RADIO NETWORK:
Freakonomics began as a book, which led to a blog, a documentary film, more books, a pair of pants, and in 2010, a podcast called Freakonomics Radio. Hosted by Stephen J. Dubner, it’s one of the most popular podcasts in the world, with a reputation for storytelling that is both rigorous and entertaining. Its archive of more than 500 episodes is available, for free, on any podcast app, and the show airs weekly on NPR stations. Freakonomics Radio is now the flagship show of the Freakonomics Radio Network, which includes the podcasts No Stupid Questions, People I (Mostly) Admire, and The Economics of Everyday Things.
FREAKONOMICS RADIO NETWORK PODCASTS:
Freakonomics Radio: freakonomics.c...
No Stupid Questions: freakonomics.c...
People I (Mostly) Admire: freakonomics.c...
The Economics of Everyday Things: freakonomics.c...
Special series: freakonomics.c...
CONNECT WITH US:
radio@freakonomics.com
/ freakonomics
/ freakonomics
/ freakonomics
/ freakonomicsradio
/ freakonomics-media
Subscribe to our newsletter: eepurl.com/bKm0cf
Context-sensitive...yes! Here in Paris, France public transportation (run by the RATP in Paris proper and Île de France Mobilité in the Paris region) is NOT free, but it IS used (maybe overused...some lines are groaning with insufficient capacity to meet demand), by everybody...not just poor people. I have never heard the "fare-free" argument proposed here although there are some cities in France where it is being tried out.
I believe that public transit goes hand in hand with density. You can’t really expect good things from one if it’s not accompanied by the other. For example, I live in a predominantly suburban city that has a reasonably well run transit system that no one uses because it simply can’t be effective in a place that was built around the idea that everyone would have two vehicles in their driveways.
I participated in the civil rights movement of the mid 1960s where the key word was “integration” which evolved into the lengthy jargon bleated out by that mayor. Once the Democratic Party realized if black people were integrated they would stop being a solid voting block for the party, so they embarked on what we see today, constant around the clock sensationalism of sad incidents between the races to keep
Blacks paranoid and afraid to leave their neighborhoods. Education is the main way that people progress in life. The billions and billions spent on public transit could be reduced by just buying cars for the poor, providing insurance and repairs. And it would be less damaging to the environment. The Democratic Party are THE systemic racism. I have watched this nonsense go on for 60 years!
Yes, Cooperations and
Small business should cover the cost. Customer acquisition.
There's no such thing as "free." There are only different options for how you are going to pay for something.
However when people use the word "free", they're referring to it being free at the point of service. Obviously anything of value requires money to finance.
@@JIIKX1 Yes, that's exactly my point. However "free at the point of service" still isn't free in any sense of the word. Call it what it is - taxpayer subsidized. Anything else is deceptive.
@@bsmithhammer It’s only deceptive if you’re cognitively challenged
I agree with you.
I would be open to the idea of having all forms of public transportation be subsidized, but only if the gov. Isn't the one in charge of the building or maintaining it but rather have a private company do it based on who gives the best and lowest price.
No more cal trans.
so do you pay for street parking 100% of the time and do you pay for public road usage?
You see subsidies for buses will take cars off the roads. 1 bus = ~50 cars staying home a day. 50 vehicles will require X sq ft of new road + Y sq ft of road maintenance. Do you see how FREE buses are profitable for tax payers?
Red lights are ignore in worcester which they ignore buses with flashing red lights and ambulances
yo wdym by which do you think is more likely "the mayor of boston would be michelle wu"
TAX 70% of income of 1% of wealthy individuals + take 15% of published profits from SP500 corporations. You can have free buses and rail for everyone + you can triple teachers' salaries.