Jonathan Edwards' Typology: Weird? Awesome? / Joe Rigney & Doug Wilson

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 25

  • @TheIsabellakirra
    @TheIsabellakirra 6 лет назад +7

    This is such a confirmation. Gods been unlocking the scripture for me like this the last 2 years.... I’ve never heard of this before. Great discussion! 👌🏽

    • @CanonPress
      @CanonPress  6 лет назад +3

      Thanks, Julie! For more like this be sure to visit canonpress.com and enjoy searching around for other videos on our page!

  • @cscutler
    @cscutler 3 года назад +7

    This is why "i believe" a dispensational hermeneutic is incorrect.

  • @michaelmorais6206
    @michaelmorais6206 Месяц назад

    Another thought provoking presentation. My concern is when we begin allegorizing and draw fanciful conclusions that are entirely out of context

  • @riverjao
    @riverjao 5 лет назад +5

    Great stuff here!!! It’s so odd to me that so many Reformed ministers speak out against allegory and typology when the NT uses it almost constantly!

    • @philipmurray9796
      @philipmurray9796 3 года назад

      there's a difference between divinely inspired allegory with biblical interpretation and novelty allegorization.

    • @riverjao
      @riverjao 3 года назад

      @@philipmurray9796 Amen!

  • @danielm.7880
    @danielm.7880 2 года назад +2

    Where can one find the book by Edwards? At a reasonable price of-course.

  • @jiml9616
    @jiml9616 Год назад

    Hi Doug, I’ve a good friend in Ireland who’s a Free presbyterian
    What do you know of this and have you heard of Dr Ian Paisley? Thanks, Jim Lacy

  • @CultureDweeb
    @CultureDweeb 12 лет назад +2

    Anyone know which book of Edwards on Typology Wilson is speaking of here? (3:58)

    • @ibperson7765
      @ibperson7765 2 года назад +2

      Well you asked ten years ago, but the answer is “Typological Writings” , Yale University Press

    • @CultureDweeb
      @CultureDweeb 2 года назад +2

      @@ibperson7765 thanks

    • @mosesking2923
      @mosesking2923 Год назад +1

      @@CultureDweeb The book is called "Typological Writings"

  • @alexev526
    @alexev526 12 лет назад +7

    It's called Typological Readings. The only place I found it was through Yale University Press. It's a TOUGH book

    • @craigdesjardins3764
      @craigdesjardins3764 3 года назад +2

      Typological Writings.

    • @Chief_Of_Sinners
      @Chief_Of_Sinners 3 месяца назад

      ​@@craigdesjardins3764I thought it would improve my typing speed, but it did nothing of the sort! I should've watched this video first. I want my $8.99 refunded.

  • @ibperson7765
    @ibperson7765 2 года назад +2

    Isaiah 53 was removed from Saturday readings by many sects because of causing “controversy”. So, it’s not as hard as Jonah.

  • @andrewtaylor1737
    @andrewtaylor1737 3 года назад

    I am struggling to get through Edwards "freedom of the will". it's a hard read for me.

  • @MarkCox21125150
    @MarkCox21125150 4 года назад +1

    This was very helpful!

  • @mosesking2923
    @mosesking2923 9 месяцев назад

    8:03 is the chief argument that can cause some worry. Making Joseph the Patriarch a type of Jesus has strong backing. God didn't allow the tower in Siloam to crash down for the purpose of giving us a symbol of death and damnation. It was an event that Christ used as an illustration.

  • @richardtallach7104
    @richardtallach7104 11 месяцев назад

    Fairbairn is the best on biblical typology.

  • @mctxonline
    @mctxonline 2 года назад +1

    Joe had good questions which reminded me of the fad some good brothers of mine got into seeing The Matrix stories as a type of Christ. note the Wachowski twins now think they are women.

    • @brycerogers5050
      @brycerogers5050 Год назад +1

      It's true, the Wachowskis are in a grave state as fallen men, and it would also be naive and wrong to take it as a 1:1 Biblical comparison. But, I still think, even if it wasn't the directors' intent, any time someone feels compelled to write or enjoy a resurrected hero motif, it is some semblance of Christ's Lordship of the universe appealing to the human heart (Eccl 3:11). Granted, I also think Satan wraps that motif in a bunch of other nonsense when media is created / enjoyed, and I'm not recommending the Matrix or Hollywood in general, but I still think the kernel in the center of it is a type of Christ.