This is the fallout of overturning Roe vs Wade. How did state legislatures get into the business of dictating women's health choices? Don't they have more relevant state business to address?
Wow, just because it finally passed the house, it needs to pass the senate. However, this also means one has to pay attention to the law being created and presented to the people in November! We all need to know Women's Rights will still need More attention! Vote wisely in November. Do not let this passive change affect the determination to reinstate full women's rights!
To the best of my knowledge, this being repealed still only gives us the lousy 15 week limit law, which is still terribly narrow. I hope this stunt by the court wasn't just to get us content with JUST that one without doing any efforts to go back to at LEAST Roe standards, which was _already_ a strict compromise even over 50 years ago. Give the Republicans an inch, and they'll take us back to the colonies.
Oh, sure, because it's totally not barbaric and archaic to force women into becoming prisoners of their own bodies while pregnant, when all the other silly and made up religious reasons to do so gradually keep fading away.
Imagine a world where we didn't worry about abortion and left it between the mother and doctor... I ask or challenge any PROLIFER, to leave emotion and religion out of it when answering this question... How does a woman's choice to have an abortion, especially in a completely different part of the world because let's be real, you would seek to have a global abortion ban if you could, how does it affect YOU personally in any way shape or form other than the simple fact that you disagree with it? Do you feel a pinch or shiver down your spine every time an abortion is performed? Does YOUR wallet or bank account feel lighter when a mother makes the difficult choice?
Science says it's a life, and if we believe in human rights, it has a right to life. I don't care what the woman does with her body. When it comes to mutilating and tearing apart the body inside of her, is what people that are prolife want to protect.
The problem with your rational perspective and analysis is that religion gives rise to passionate emotion, overriding all capacity for reason. No only that, but these zealots are ordered by the tenets and laws of their religion NOT to use reason--"the Devil's playground." They scorn any form of higher education, science in particular. In the 1950s it was all about "a Communist plot." Seventy years later it's all about Satan letting loose on the world. These people's credulity is shocking. As is their desire to be dominated by some sort of Overlord. Real or imaginary.
it wouldnt physically affect me personally, but it would affect the 73 MILLION innocent babies murdered inside of the womb globally per year. it is not for me, it is for the children.
@@benking-rm5yg Until the moment a child gets r@ped and gets pregnant as a result. In which case, it's no longer for "children." It's for zygotes, embryos and fetuses.
@@chucksucks8640 a embryo is not a baby. Just like a chicken egg is not a chicken. It’s called biology dude. I think you failed that. Also Jesus is not God there is a God, but Jesus is not it.
@@MLM68an embryo is a human life in the embryonic stage. I’m sorry the education system and these lost politicians lie to you. Also Jesus is in fact God manifested into human flesh. Not sure where you got that misinformation as well but thought I’d clear that up for you “I and the father are one” (John 10:30), he also had people proclaim him to be their lord and their God and Jesus did not correct them for a reason.
Ok, so wow. In the 1870s, when this law was originally passed, Arizona had less then 10,000 residents. What a great basis upon which to argue a statute being re-enacted. I'm sure they did a stellar job back then to make sure the law was sound. So, who was responsible for the law back then? House Speaker William Claude Jones. Jones was responsible for shepherding the abortion ban through the Legislature. Around this time, Jones abandoned his first wife. Throughout his life, he would have three more wives, including a 12-year-old, a 15-year-old, and a 14-year-old at the time of their weddings.
I have no issue with people debating either perspective, as long as they do so with facts. Sadly the pro life side seem incapable of doing this, and even in this report, there are many instances of this. I can't think of anywhere on the planet that has 'unrestricted access to abortion', because, there are STRICT medical ethical constraints controlling access, administration, and limits, on access to such a procedure, something which the pro life side completely fail to acknowledge, let alone research. To stand up and say that the majority of people don't support abortion being available, is an outright lie. We know this as in one state, after Roe v Wade was overturned it was put to a vote, and the vote was for no ban. The trigger laws enacted in many states, after the overturning of Roe v Wade, was absolutely diabolical, and certainly not an example of democracy at work. I haven't seen any of those states involve or consult with medical experts to examine the issue, they just literally flicked a switch and banned everything and the fallout has been shocking. OBGYNs leaving certain states. Women needing treatment having to travel if they even had the resources to be able to do so, and being threatened with criminal prosecution. Perfect example of how to reverse society back 60 years and completely disregard women's rights. It is sad that it has taken this long for the ban to be repealed, but there are still many other states where their trigger laws remain in place. As for the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade, that needs to be looked at with a fine tooth comb. It makes no sense for a civilised democracy to decide the complete opposite to what every other democratic country has long decided. Even in IRELAND, where religion has played such a pivotal role in society, abortion is legal, after a 3 day waiting period and if the pregnancy is less than 12 weeks. Even in Ireland!!!!! Just let that sink in. On a subject like this, Ireland is more liberal than some of the states in America.... go figure.
i dont get it. This is a total ban on any situation? Before a certain time it should be totally legal but if your taking out a full healthy live body.....thats crazy.
I am afraid you have been, I hesitate to say brainwashed by the Evilgelicals but there is almost 0% of that happening nationwide. Have you been convinced of their psy op that women in California have 4-5 abortions a year?
Let's leave religion or if this for a min.. Let's take a good look at or IF these woman are really looking at just themselves or are ANY OF THEM... THINKING OF OR EVEN GIVING A THOUGHT TO THE CHILD AS ANOTHER HUMAN BEING...A LIFE THAT COULD'VE HAD A CHANCE... BUT BECAUSE IT'S THE "WOMAN'S CHOICE"... OH AND NOT ASK CHOICES ARE THE RIGHT ONES... IS THERE NO THOUGHT OF THIS UNBORN CHILD AND WHAT KIND OF FUTURE OR LIFE OR PERSON IT COULD BE IF GIVEN A CHANCE... IF THEY DIDN'T WANT THE CHILD GIVE IT A CHANCE WITH SOMEONE ELSE THAT WANTS A CHILD OR SOMEONE THAT WANTS ONE AND MAYBE CAN'T HAVE CHILDREN. BEING SELFISH, THOUGHTLESS BRINGS ALONG LIFE LONG CONSEQUENCES.
In other words you would force a woman to carry a pregnancy to term, subject her body to major changes in order to give up a child. I wonder how many of these legislators would truly force this onto their daughters, women friends, or wives and husbands who cannot afford another child. The medical implications of birth, the financial costs etc. - who is willing to pay? Birth control is not 100% effective.
You amuse me by completely ignoring the fact that you can't forcibly give a piece of a woman's body a chance at anything without taking away the chance for the women to just not be pregnant till later or just plain never if they feel like it. Why SHOULD we be birthing kids into dis-functional circumstances anyway? How is artificially making things worse on our women supposed to be good for our society?
What's the matter with people and having thought to a choice. I don't think I said anything about forcing any woman to do anything... Not sure why people have such a problem with thinking about the choices they're making... To not have to worry about consequences after the fact.... And just because people use all caps does not always mean that they're yelling. Sometimes it's just getting a point across to give a better understanding. I think some people are just too simple-minded to understand anything outside of their own little box. Sorry that some people might be limited in thought. Must have stuck a nerve about being selfish and thoughtless of another human being that they're carrying. You can't blame a child for something that wasn't their fault to begin with.
If you don't believe in Jesus for your salvation, your name will not be in the Lambs Book of Life, and you will be weeping and gnashing your teeth in the lake of fire forever.
![TRASH or PASS! Eminem ( Houdini ) [REACTION!!!]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cB1WrZcMwMc/mqdefault.jpg)
Sanity prevailed but only barely.
The Karen’s of Politics lose their miserable plans 😂
This is the fallout of overturning Roe vs Wade. How did state legislatures
get into the business of dictating women's health choices? Don't they have
more relevant state business to address?
No, this has consumed the Evilgelicals for nearly half a century.
@@yelleryoung5870 Not to mention their obsession with women's hemlines.
Punish your Republicans, AZ.
These 3 Rinos surely will be punished.
Wow, just because it finally passed the house, it needs to pass the senate. However, this also means one has to pay attention to the law being created and presented to the people in November! We all need to know Women's Rights will still need More attention! Vote wisely in November. Do not let this passive change affect the determination to reinstate full women's rights!
To the best of my knowledge, this being repealed still only gives us the lousy 15 week limit law, which is still terribly narrow. I hope this stunt by the court wasn't just to get us content with JUST that one without doing any efforts to go back to at LEAST Roe standards, which was _already_ a strict compromise even over 50 years ago. Give the Republicans an inch, and they'll take us back to the colonies.
Oh, sure, because it's totally not barbaric and archaic to force women into becoming prisoners of their own bodies while pregnant, when all the other silly and made up religious reasons to do so gradually keep fading away.
Keep your legs shut and don't commit the one and only act that can get you pregnant. It's really simple to do.
They should try speaking in tongues.🤪
Oh, don't worry--that's how they spend their Friday nights after Bible Study. And every night through the other six days of the week.
😂
Imagine a world where we didn't worry about abortion and left it between the mother and doctor... I ask or challenge any PROLIFER, to leave emotion and religion out of it when answering this question... How does a woman's choice to have an abortion, especially in a completely different part of the world because let's be real, you would seek to have a global abortion ban if you could, how does it affect YOU personally in any way shape or form other than the simple fact that you disagree with it? Do you feel a pinch or shiver down your spine every time an abortion is performed? Does YOUR wallet or bank account feel lighter when a mother makes the difficult choice?
Science says it's a life, and if we believe in human rights, it has a right to life. I don't care what the woman does with her body. When it comes to mutilating and tearing apart the body inside of her, is what people that are prolife want to protect.
The problem with your rational perspective and analysis is that religion gives rise to passionate emotion, overriding all capacity for reason. No only that, but these zealots are ordered by the tenets and laws of their religion NOT to use reason--"the Devil's playground." They scorn any form of higher education, science in particular. In the 1950s it was all about "a Communist plot." Seventy years later it's all about Satan letting loose on the world. These people's credulity is shocking. As is their desire to be dominated by some sort of Overlord. Real or imaginary.
it wouldnt physically affect me personally, but it would affect the 73 MILLION innocent babies murdered inside of the womb globally per year. it is not for me, it is for the children.
@@benking-rm5yg Embryos and young fetuses aren't sentient though so they don't care about anything.
@@benking-rm5yg Until the moment a child gets r@ped and gets pregnant as a result.
In which case, it's no longer for "children." It's for zygotes, embryos and fetuses.
Can't believe this is an issue. "An ancient barbaric, inhumane " blah blah blah shut up already
No. And learn to spell.
A major win for women of America we will not go back
Score a win for common sense, respect, dignity and safety for women in Az.
It is dignified to kill a baby?
@@chucksucks8640I’ll give you a like in a week, if no one else does.
@@chucksucks8640Depends on religion.
Some religions are pro-choice
@@chucksucks8640 a embryo is not a baby. Just like a chicken egg is not a chicken. It’s called biology dude. I think you failed that. Also Jesus is not God there is a God, but Jesus is not it.
@@MLM68an embryo is a human life in the embryonic stage. I’m sorry the education system and these lost politicians lie to you.
Also Jesus is in fact God manifested into human flesh. Not sure where you got that misinformation as well but thought I’d clear that up for you “I and the father are one” (John 10:30), he also had people proclaim him to be their lord and their God and Jesus did not correct them for a reason.
💘A President with problems will creates even more problems!💔
A small victory for women reproductive rights
Ok, so wow. In the 1870s, when this law was originally passed, Arizona had less then 10,000 residents. What a great basis upon which to argue a statute being re-enacted. I'm sure they did a stellar job back then to make sure the law was sound.
So, who was responsible for the law back then?
House Speaker William Claude Jones.
Jones was responsible for shepherding the abortion ban through the Legislature. Around this time, Jones abandoned his first wife. Throughout his life, he would have three more wives, including a 12-year-old, a 15-year-old, and a 14-year-old at the time of their weddings.
Unbelievable.
This is why it's important to vote blue in ALL elections, not just for the Presidency.
😂Who's keeping score? Women 2- Others 1..🎉
babies-0
@@benking-rm5ygDepends on definition of a baby
@@nolwino there is multiple definitions? it is a child being murdered inside of a womans body.
@@benking-rm5ygHow many children are living without a brain?
@@benking-rm5yg How many people are living without a brain?
Thank you Stephanie.
What the heck is the background music- ugh! Makes it sound like reality tv.
Repeal the cruelty
Vote Blue!🙏💙
I have no issue with people debating either perspective, as long as they do so with facts. Sadly the pro life side seem incapable of doing this, and even in this report, there are many instances of this.
I can't think of anywhere on the planet that has 'unrestricted access to abortion', because, there are STRICT medical ethical constraints controlling access, administration, and limits, on access to such a procedure, something which the pro life side completely fail to acknowledge, let alone research.
To stand up and say that the majority of people don't support abortion being available, is an outright lie. We know this as in one state, after Roe v Wade was overturned it was put to a vote, and the vote was for no ban.
The trigger laws enacted in many states, after the overturning of Roe v Wade, was absolutely diabolical, and certainly not an example of democracy at work. I haven't seen any of those states involve or consult with medical experts to examine the issue, they just literally flicked a switch and banned everything and the fallout has been shocking. OBGYNs leaving certain states. Women needing treatment having to travel if they even had the resources to be able to do so, and being threatened with criminal prosecution.
Perfect example of how to reverse society back 60 years and completely disregard women's rights.
It is sad that it has taken this long for the ban to be repealed, but there are still many other states where their trigger laws remain in place.
As for the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade, that needs to be looked at with a fine tooth comb. It makes no sense for a civilised democracy to decide the complete opposite to what every other democratic country has long decided. Even in IRELAND, where religion has played such a pivotal role in society, abortion is legal, after a 3 day waiting period and if the pregnancy is less than 12 weeks. Even in Ireland!!!!! Just let that sink in. On a subject like this, Ireland is more liberal than some of the states in America.... go figure.
i dont get it. This is a total ban on any situation? Before a certain time it should be totally legal but if your taking out a full healthy live body.....thats crazy.
Taking out a full healthy body DOES NOT happen.
I am afraid you have been, I hesitate to say brainwashed by the Evilgelicals but there is almost 0% of that happening nationwide.
Have you been convinced of their psy op that women in California have 4-5 abortions a year?
The ban from the 1800's was forcing women to die with their babies. No one takes out a 9 month baby unless its already dead.
I wonder why you didn’t show the names of these legislators. Don’t want us voting pro-abortion supporters?
I mean, this is just a cliffnotes video on the matter. It's not hard to find this among Arizona's House logs at the moment.
😆 "pro abortion"
Do you prefer to call government control of women's bodies Christian Sharia law or communism?
Verses Pro Forced Birth.
We should not be making laws about something that should be between a woman and her doctor and family.
Let's leave religion or if this for a min..
Let's take a good look at or IF these woman are really looking at just themselves or are ANY OF THEM...
THINKING OF OR EVEN GIVING A THOUGHT TO THE CHILD AS ANOTHER HUMAN BEING...A LIFE THAT COULD'VE HAD A CHANCE... BUT BECAUSE IT'S THE "WOMAN'S CHOICE"...
OH AND NOT ASK CHOICES ARE THE RIGHT ONES...
IS THERE NO THOUGHT OF THIS UNBORN CHILD AND WHAT KIND OF FUTURE OR LIFE OR PERSON IT COULD BE IF GIVEN A CHANCE...
IF THEY DIDN'T WANT THE CHILD GIVE IT A CHANCE WITH SOMEONE ELSE THAT WANTS A CHILD OR SOMEONE THAT WANTS ONE AND MAYBE CAN'T HAVE CHILDREN.
BEING SELFISH, THOUGHTLESS BRINGS ALONG LIFE LONG CONSEQUENCES.
Why are you shouting?
In other words you would force a woman to carry a pregnancy to term,
subject her body to major changes in order to give up a child.
I wonder how many of these legislators would truly force this onto
their daughters, women friends, or wives and husbands who cannot
afford another child. The medical implications of birth, the financial costs
etc. - who is willing to pay? Birth control is not 100% effective.
So, you feel that you need to murder women because of some misinformed "morality"?
Women do not get abortion "Just because".
You amuse me by completely ignoring the fact that you can't forcibly give a piece of a woman's body a chance at anything without taking away the chance for the women to just not be pregnant till later or just plain never if they feel like it. Why SHOULD we be birthing kids into dis-functional circumstances anyway? How is artificially making things worse on our women supposed to be good for our society?
What's the matter with people and having thought to a choice.
I don't think I said anything about forcing any woman to do anything...
Not sure why people have such a problem with thinking about the choices they're making...
To not have to worry about consequences after the fact....
And just because people use all caps does not always mean that they're yelling.
Sometimes it's just getting a point across to give a better understanding.
I think some people are just too simple-minded to understand anything outside of their own little box.
Sorry that some people might be limited in thought.
Must have stuck a nerve about being selfish and thoughtless of another human being that they're carrying.
You can't blame a child for something that wasn't their fault to begin with.
Come soon, Jesus!!!
The Bible says he was to return before all of his disciples died.
You seriously think there are men over 2000 years old walking around?
@@yelleryoung5870 Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved (Acts 16:31).
@@timcurtis4041 Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
Abraham Lincoln.
If you don't believe in Jesus for your salvation, your name will not be in the Lambs Book of Life, and you will be weeping and gnashing your teeth in the lake of fire forever.
@@timcurtis4041 We're Arizonans here. This IS the lake of fire.
Hell is coming!
Y'all been telling us that for like 2,000 years now.
Surprise 🎉 You’re already in hell, idiot.😂
What if we don't believe in silly sky fairies or superstitions?
The hell that is coming will be at the hand of man.
Awesome! I can use a tan.