Or just use chapters. It's very common for their 8+ hour streams to have no chapters. No one wants to sit there scrubbing through it all, or watching the whole thing. I'm betting they get more VOD watchers than actual live anyway and no one watching live is watching all 8 hours. Hopefully "more modern" means using existing features like chapters.
I would like to see a little more transparency regarding financial backing, editorial decisions, and guest choices. And any adult influence-whether explicit or implicit-that plays a role, whether through mentoring, financial support, or providing industry knowledge. Including but not limited to legal advice, media standards and guidance, and how these may influence editorial decisions.
@@leo_puglisi6 Thanks for the reply. Though it doesn't entirely address the concerns. With regard to Patreon, there are settings that increase or decrease transparency with regard to support, and in 6 News Australia's case they're locked down fairly tight.
Could you possibly be any more patronising? Leo started 6 from scratch & probably knows more about news-gathering than some journos twice his age. Give him a break.
@ These are just questions that can be either answered or ignored. As a potential financial supporter I think they're entirely reasonable. Traditional media loves to hide behind obscurity. A stand out in the landscape might consider thorough transparency as a differentiator.
Support 6 News for just $4/month: patreon.com/6newsau
Keep 6 news alive!
Congratulations 🎉
This guy is legit giving me Peter Overton vibes.
Different video stream for each story please
Or just use chapters. It's very common for their 8+ hour streams to have no chapters. No one wants to sit there scrubbing through it all, or watching the whole thing. I'm betting they get more VOD watchers than actual live anyway and no one watching live is watching all 8 hours. Hopefully "more modern" means using existing features like chapters.
Maybe, to catch eyes. Shorts two quick stories, we all know attention spans are are what was I saying.
I would like to see a little more transparency regarding financial backing, editorial decisions, and guest choices. And any adult influence-whether explicit or implicit-that plays a role, whether through mentoring, financial support, or providing industry knowledge. Including but not limited to legal advice, media standards and guidance, and how these may influence editorial decisions.
90+% funding is from Patreon, the rest is RUclips ads - we have zero companies backing us
@@leo_puglisi6 Thanks for the reply. Though it doesn't entirely address the concerns. With regard to Patreon, there are settings that increase or decrease transparency with regard to support, and in 6 News Australia's case they're locked down fairly tight.
Could you possibly be any more patronising? Leo started 6 from scratch & probably knows more about news-gathering than some journos twice his age. Give him a break.
@ These are just questions that can be either answered or ignored. As a potential financial supporter I think they're entirely reasonable. Traditional media loves to hide behind obscurity. A stand out in the landscape might consider thorough transparency as a differentiator.