@@AZ-dj1ni The base reward is not good, jdam can spam airport AA very safely, Effective and good reward, one airport have 10 AA the AV8B NA can do it too but the f15e is more powerful (and fun)
@@BlueTurtleClips exactly! That’s the trade off, idk why people can’t understand that. And that the E didn’t get them till the late 2000s early 2010s, whereas the I has had them since production in 1998
Just in case you didn’t know Boeing made a later version of the f15E for Israel which was named the f15I BY BOEING, which irl had better engines and avionics.
The biggest feature is the additional countermeassures. God damn. Additional countermeassures and a much more powerfull engines, is going to be a menace at top tier
EDIT: one particularly astute commenter pointed out to me the fact that gaijin is a company designed to make money. Sometimes your guys’ genius is astounding. So the reason they nerfed it is to “give a reason to grind the other aircraft’s,” right? Well it’s a well known fact the US tech tree is the most god damn bloated tech tree in existence. There are so many different aircraft, but you can go straight down one line and get ample air to air and air to ground capability out of one line of the tech tree. So basically what they’re saying is they are nerfing it, to waste your time to make you grind more, because the more of your time they can waste, the more money you will spend on premium so that you don’t have to no life the game for 3 years to get all the good vehicles! Yippee! v ORIGINAL v I’m crashing out over the engine thing. There is NO reason they give the I the 229 and give the E the 220. Feels like they have it out for American mains tbh. The whole no reason to use the other eagles issue is a total cop out. I have always known that gaijin can be a little bit biased sometimes and they are a Russian company so I try to understand it and just enjoy the game they made, but never in my nearly a decade of experience in war thunder have I seen them come out and say that the reason they’re nerfing an American jet is because: they feel like it and we can’t stop them. Which, I know that’s not literally what they said, but when they come out and say it’s so that “there’s a reason” to play other eagles, that holds no water and is just obviously not their motivation behind it. We have always had aircraft in the game that were just worse than others or irrelevant within the same tech tree, and it’s not like this would make the C variant a bad plane overnight, it is still a great flight model and perhaps would still be better. So them saying this is their reason is just a spit in the face. Be honest gaijin. It is insulting when you do this.
See this is why I say people who play the US have their hands held, they’re not nerfing the F-15E, the I just has better engines. Here’s a downside, the I doesn’t get AGM’s. This will actually kinda be a jet worth playing in the Israeli tech tree after all the neglect it has had in the past.
Not giving strike eagle P&W F-100-229’s is a crime.. its funny how they use the Mountain Home paint scheme for the F-15E and not give it the 229’s… MO’s never used 220’s.. typical😂😂
Why do the Americans never get the best version of their own aircraft? Let’s make the Japanese F-15C better than the American one, and the Israeli F-15E better than the American one wtf
@@MilitaryTechNerd006 im not saying it shouldnt, as a us main i want the an e with 229s. im just saying that the only way gaijin shafting the us again could make sense is if the spaded engines on the american e turned them into 229s.
@@datboi2232 this was essentially cherry picking on gaijins part because that version didn’t even have HMD, and was immediately corrected to have the proper engines after the Air Force complained, and now those aircraft with the weaker engines are going to be retired early. It was the very first few batches only that were delivered like this, and it is sort of bs that gaijin would add that version when the Israeli one is already here with that better engine.
@@larshenrik8900 The AGM-65G doesn't have many differences from the AGM-65D, just mainly the warhead. It can be carried on the triple rack since it is the same size as the D and doesn't reach the maximum weight of the rack.
F15E has mavs, F15I doesn't, simple balance difference for engine power and historical as USA F15E didn't get the 229 til later refits whereas the F15I was shipped with them, come on people just google.
@@Moondoggymungmung that’s not why gaijin is withholding the 229 engine from the E variant. Also kind of irrelevant considering that the version of the F-15E with the 220 engine is literally a decade older than the F-15I. GIVE 229
@@bluefox9436 yup they do that all the time. No matter what reasoning people retroactively pin to this issue at the end of the day all they’re doing is excusing the distasteful behavior of a $100,000,000/year company.
“It’s not a lot of fuel, 40 minutes” 40 minutes is almost 2x times more fuel than it’ll be able to burn in whole RB match, the best fuel load is the same as for the 15C and the 15A - min fuel or 15mins + 1 fuel tank for RB or min fuel/15 mins + 3 fuel tanks for sim (i mean for adequate sim maps like Afghanistan or Spain, not those sh*tty Sinai/Tunisia/Smolensk and other completely flat maps with total area of 0.00001mm^2 that shouldn’t even exist at 11.0+ BR)
I'm just gonna point out one problem there. If you can have fuel internal, do it, because having the fuel tanks causes not only more weight due to the fuel housings of the tanks (yes you can jetti but that's a waste of time and you can also jettison fuel pretty good with the afterburner so no excuses for "I want to save muh weight") but also the drag is gonna make you dog shit in the vertical or slow speed flight regimes, which means if you get caught in a fight it's not only gonna be tough, but to actually win you have to give up everything and be basically useless and have to RTB immediately because you had to return a few thousand liters of dead dinosaurs back to its natural habitat. So I'd just keep full internal and maybe run one tank, or 70% internal with one big centerline that way you keep pylons open, weight and drag down, still maintain some competition in a fight, and maintain your operational radius. But if I'm ever on the other team, I implore you to keep doing what you're doing
@@toxickilljoy9037 I assume you dont know that you can drop fuel tanks any time you want so if someone sneaked up on you or if you faced an enemy that has more than 1-2 braincells so he dodged all of your missiles and got close then you’ll be light and be able to dogfight after dropping fuel tanks. On the other hand with fuel in internal tanks you’ll be a fat cow without a single chance to win any DF and without a possibility to get rid of that fuel as well. So i too hope that you’ll always be in enemy team and will fly with sh*t load of fuel all the time lmao
@@adrianfolstad4925 yes because we could receive a very similar version with the same engines but they deliberately gave the Americans the inferior version. There's no point in getting it over the Israeli one
I'm so glad the F15E isn't in the fighter line - Imagine having to grind out a plane that's not even an upgrade over the previous one in terms of air to air capability
@@ClankerWanker For air to ground yes, but for air to air the differences are... pretty minor. The F15C has already one of the best mechanical radars out there - any really noticeable improvement would have to be a PESA or AESA radar.
@@bluefox9436 well this one says 120 mile range on small targets for the strike eagle, idk if f15c should be the same but that’s certainly not what we see in game
They should add the ability to carry 2 agm 65g + 1 agm 65d on one pilon, since 3 agm 65g are too heavy for the tripple mount, but 2 g' +1 d is possible and there is photo proof of use
BS the Real life Radar can detect none moving ground targets and is just as good if not better than the Russian Radar but in game the Russian Tree gets every thing for their Paper Vehicles and Bs Proto types
The f15e modeling is so inaccurate, it bleeds speed like crazy irl, its not nible, its heavy and fat, it can fly without the cft, which was never done in combat, like ever and so much more
@@xtodnfs549 ok just because they didn’t do it in combat doesn’t mean remove it from the game. It has that capability and it was specifically designed to. Also you’re wrong about the modeling. Coming from both the eagle and strike eagle pilots who did dogfight against each other, the strike eagle keeps up just fine
no sure what people are talking about the us 1 is still way better at its job since you can have 6 mav plus the 20 gbus or the 9 lazer guided bombs or a mix of both thats actualy an insane cas loadout. in the pure cas role the US f15e is gonna be the new best in the game for sure
Because none of this stuff will help me in air realistic battles... Just give us the goddamn engine upgrade and the Israeli one it's ground attack capability
@@keno5839 none of that will help in air rb and also I have a pro gamer theory here. In a real match against a real team, you’re never gonna have the chance to drop so many bombs before a pantsir takes you out, at least not without the engine upgrade. I think the mavs are practically irrelevant for kill potential except for in a very theoretical game where the Russians don’t bring any pantsirs. With both of these aircraft we are beginning to see the limits of taking more payload. I highly doubt players will even take the full 20 bombs due to how much faster they could be without them, dramatically increasing survival which at the end of the day is the most important factor
@@ClankerWanker i mean i literally said in my comment it will be better in the PURE CAS ROLE air rb was not brough up cause yeah no shit better engines makes it better in air rb and your not gonna be dropping the bombs 1 at a time anyway.
@@keno5839 not trying to be rude here but please read past the first sentence. There’s this grayed out text under it that says “read more…” and when you click on it it actually reveals more words that I said to specifically address its CAS role
For some reason my account got reseted on the Dev Server, and I lost all of my researched vehicles, and have to start over, from the tutorial. 😭 Does anyone know how to solve this? (I know I should write to the support tho...)
If you have installed the Dev Server in the same file location as the normal game then it is possible that you have overwritten your game progress. At least that's what I saw in a tutorial and I don't know if you can undo it.
@@florianbruckner3130 Thanks for the answer, but I have never encountered with this before, and it was perfectly fine until this update, and both of the main folders are independent from each other.
I don’t understand why the f15e has the worse engines and the f15I has the better engines even tho they are quite literally the same jet, that annoys me so much and I hope they fix it
@@TheArcticFoxxo Even if that's true why does the U.S get the worse version? Why not just give them the same engines? The American ones did also use the pw229 so theres really no reason to piss off the u.s community like that
@@bt_the_yank6234 Great question, I'd say to add some variety. I can bet you 100% that people would cry and bitch about the F-15I being copy/paste with less weaponry if an early '00s F-15E was implemented... Even if it were historical. This aircraft never used -229s until VERY recently. A large majority of the thunderbolts didn't receive them until the late 2000s, and even then their F-15Es didn't receive -229s until 2022.
Why are people soo stupid, if yoh do a quick google search you can see rhat the f15e never had the 229 engines until recently, the f15i had them from the start
@@bt_the_yank6234because by using theoretics, you make the Ra’am worse because the lack of mavericks. The engine power is accurate and a balancer between them
Find it so funny how us mains are having a mental breakdown over the fact that the engines are weaker than the israeli ones. Yet they tell anyone who complains about the flankers gimped flight model to cope 😂
The flanker’s FM isn’t gimped all that badly, it still wins in a dogfight against most planes. But then again, if you’re looking to dogfight at top tier you’re not playing it right
@christopherchartier3017 the flankers fm is definitely gimped buddy. It's oswald efficiency is much lower than it's supposed to be, it some how loses the one circle to an f16 and an f15 and it gets outrated by an f4. If the plane that's literally designed to dogfight struggles in dogfight something is very wrong.
@@christopherchartier3017 that's mainly because of R-73s, the issue with the flanker is that it's losing speed without providing any visible nose authority, but this was fine during the R-27ER era cause it was "balanced" the missiles made up for the lack of performance had it been fixed earlier the flanker would be quite literally unbeatable in any engagement (with how it's missiles were implemented in game). But for balance they gave it a worse FM. The same will probably apply to the f15e and f15I they are definitely gonna nerf the energy retention you just cannot pull 11gs while gaining speed fully horizontal, that's literal UFO logic.
@@leotsering What do you mean "they made it less maneuverable"? The F-15E is inherently sluggish with its added weight. Its engine is the only engine it had used, up until 2022.
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
APG-70 IRL ; "i can 3D map a whole base with few scans"
APG-70 in WT ; "ugh, i struggle to lock a ground target"
I mean The longbow radar is like that lol
the F-15E is the one with the most payload, it can carry 20x GBU-39 and 6X AGM-65 Mavericks
good for sim
@@陳大文-k9zwhat is the use of the 20 GBU-39(GPS guided) on Sim?
They can destroy bases?
@@陳大文-k9z good for GRB
@@AZ-dj1ni The base reward is not good, jdam can spam airport AA very safely,
Effective and good reward, one airport have 10 AA
the AV8B NA can do it too but the f15e is more powerful (and fun)
@@陳大文-k9z Yea suppressing base AA or just absolutely ending AI ground battles in one pass will be the biggest thing for the 15E/I in EC.
I’m so excited for the F-15I, I hope it can still be a good Air RB jet, like the F-15C
It will be better, same thing but better engines.
Bvvd said that if F15E gets better engines, It'll be superior to other American fighter jets, and they will be useless.
It’s actually just better. Same loadouts, much better engines, better radar, and a better camo
@@batlax18 for ground it’s a toss up because you lose the mavericks on the F-15I but you get those amazing engines.
@@BlueTurtleClips exactly! That’s the trade off, idk why people can’t understand that. And that the E didn’t get them till the late 2000s early 2010s, whereas the I has had them since production in 1998
One video per hour is crazy bro
WHY DID THEY NOT GIVE THE AMERICAN ONE UPGRADED ENGINES WTF makes no fucking sense
Because the american military sucks balls at funding?
Theres literally no reason to grind out the american one at this point. such bullshit
U guys have the best air tree stop crying
@@bt_the_yank6234u guys have the best air tree
Just in case you didn’t know Boeing made a later version of the f15E for Israel which was named the f15I BY BOEING, which irl had better engines and avionics.
Flagship fighter of Ace Combat 6: Fires of Liberation.
RIP Brimstone DOA.
WOMP WOMP
@@Modelstl063 Do you use Vikhr on Su25T/39 ? No ? Why ?
Yes, same reason, it's useless in WT being SAL
@@Real_Claudy_Focanwell you do now have it on a Mach 1 capable platform now…
The biggest feature is the additional countermeassures. God damn. Additional countermeassures and a much more powerfull engines, is going to be a menace at top tier
EDIT: one particularly astute commenter pointed out to me the fact that gaijin is a company designed to make money. Sometimes your guys’ genius is astounding. So the reason they nerfed it is to “give a reason to grind the other aircraft’s,” right? Well it’s a well known fact the US tech tree is the most god damn bloated tech tree in existence. There are so many different aircraft, but you can go straight down one line and get ample air to air and air to ground capability out of one line of the tech tree. So basically what they’re saying is they are nerfing it, to waste your time to make you grind more, because the more of your time they can waste, the more money you will spend on premium so that you don’t have to no life the game for 3 years to get all the good vehicles! Yippee!
v ORIGINAL v
I’m crashing out over the engine thing. There is NO reason they give the I the 229 and give the E the 220. Feels like they have it out for American mains tbh. The whole no reason to use the other eagles issue is a total cop out.
I have always known that gaijin can be a little bit biased sometimes and they are a Russian company so I try to understand it and just enjoy the game they made, but never in my nearly a decade of experience in war thunder have I seen them come out and say that the reason they’re nerfing an American jet is because: they feel like it and we can’t stop them. Which, I know that’s not literally what they said, but when they come out and say it’s so that “there’s a reason” to play other eagles, that holds no water and is just obviously not their motivation behind it.
We have always had aircraft in the game that were just worse than others or irrelevant within the same tech tree, and it’s not like this would make the C variant a bad plane overnight, it is still a great flight model and perhaps would still be better. So them saying this is their reason is just a spit in the face. Be honest gaijin. It is insulting when you do this.
it does kinda feel that way with how dumb their reasoning is sometimes
@@bt_the_yank6234 yes it doesn’t feel like a reason, it feels more like an excuse
F 15E should have gotten AGM-130
But it's ok for other nations to have the upgrades that they are withholding from us
See this is why I say people who play the US have their hands held, they’re not nerfing the F-15E, the I just has better engines. Here’s a downside, the I doesn’t get AGM’s. This will actually kinda be a jet worth playing in the Israeli tech tree after all the neglect it has had in the past.
Not giving strike eagle P&W F-100-229’s is a crime.. its funny how they use the Mountain Home paint scheme for the F-15E and not give it the 229’s… MO’s never used 220’s.. typical😂😂
Why do the Americans never get the best version of their own aircraft? Let’s make the Japanese F-15C better than the American one, and the Israeli F-15E better than the American one wtf
to attract players to unpopular nations🤷♂
So they give the Su34 the grom 1 & its upgraded engine, but the F-15E doesnt get the AGM-130 or the 229s... makes sense.
the only way this might make sense is if the spaded engines are 229s because the f15e launched with weaker engines originally
@@datboi2232 but then why add the f15i
@@datboi2232 true, but the Su34 still got ITS upgraded engine so I dont see why the F-15 shouldnt
@@MilitaryTechNerd006 im not saying it shouldnt, as a us main i want the an e with 229s. im just saying that the only way gaijin shafting the us again could make sense is if the spaded engines on the american e turned them into 229s.
@@datboi2232 this was essentially cherry picking on gaijins part because that version didn’t even have HMD, and was immediately corrected to have the proper engines after the Air Force complained, and now those aircraft with the weaker engines are going to be retired early. It was the very first few batches only that were delivered like this, and it is sort of bs that gaijin would add that version when the Israeli one is already here with that better engine.
F 15E should have gotten the AGM-130
Why is it limited to only two AGM-65Gs? It should be able to use six.
it only has 2 stations that can carry Mavericks and the Maverick G cannot be carried on triple racks
@@larshenrik8900 The AGM-65G doesn't have many differences from the AGM-65D, just mainly the warhead. It can be carried on the triple rack since it is the same size as the D and doesn't reach the maximum weight of the rack.
Because then it would be kinda on spar with the SU34 carrying 6 KH38ts and we can’t have that comrade xaxaxa
-Vladimir
@@Janno32_Really?
What I knew was that 65G is too heavy for triple launcher
@@뽀크롱-w6d ive found a couple things on DITC saying that the triple racks could carry 65F which is the same weight as 65G
Hope they also add the F15K Slam Eagle from the ROKAF in the US techtree as a SK subtree
Or Japan
F15E has mavs, F15I doesn't, simple balance difference for engine power and historical as USA F15E didn't get the 229 til later refits whereas the F15I was shipped with them, come on people just google.
@@Moondoggymungmung that’s not why gaijin is withholding the 229 engine from the E variant. Also kind of irrelevant considering that the version of the F-15E with the 220 engine is literally a decade older than the F-15I. GIVE 229
And they couldn't just copy and paste the plane and loadout to make everyone happy? Less work for Gaijin AND we would've been happy
@@bluefox9436 yup they do that all the time. No matter what reasoning people retroactively pin to this issue at the end of the day all they’re doing is excusing the distasteful behavior of a $100,000,000/year company.
Thank you
f15E didnt get 229 in later refits, many where delivered with 229
SDBs are so funny, bombs that do 180s are so hilarious.
Cant wait to play it in sim, anihilating ground battles
“It’s not a lot of fuel, 40 minutes”
40 minutes is almost 2x times more fuel than it’ll be able to burn in whole RB match, the best fuel load is the same as for the 15C and the 15A - min fuel or 15mins + 1 fuel tank for RB or min fuel/15 mins + 3 fuel tanks for sim (i mean for adequate sim maps like Afghanistan or Spain, not those sh*tty Sinai/Tunisia/Smolensk and other completely flat maps with total area of 0.00001mm^2 that shouldn’t even exist at 11.0+ BR)
I'm just gonna point out one problem there. If you can have fuel internal, do it, because having the fuel tanks causes not only more weight due to the fuel housings of the tanks (yes you can jetti but that's a waste of time and you can also jettison fuel pretty good with the afterburner so no excuses for "I want to save muh weight") but also the drag is gonna make you dog shit in the vertical or slow speed flight regimes, which means if you get caught in a fight it's not only gonna be tough, but to actually win you have to give up everything and be basically useless and have to RTB immediately because you had to return a few thousand liters of dead dinosaurs back to its natural habitat. So I'd just keep full internal and maybe run one tank, or 70% internal with one big centerline that way you keep pylons open, weight and drag down, still maintain some competition in a fight, and maintain your operational radius. But if I'm ever on the other team, I implore you to keep doing what you're doing
@@toxickilljoy9037 I assume you dont know that you can drop fuel tanks any time you want so if someone sneaked up on you or if you faced an enemy that has more than 1-2 braincells so he dodged all of your missiles and got close then you’ll be light and be able to dogfight after dropping fuel tanks. On the other hand with fuel in internal tanks you’ll be a fat cow without a single chance to win any DF and without a possibility to get rid of that fuel as well. So i too hope that you’ll always be in enemy team and will fly with sh*t load of fuel all the time lmao
alright its confirmed USA needs f15EX
I knew these idiot developers wouldn’t be able to get the ground mapping radar correct 😂
If they want it even remotely accurate they should at least make static targets show up on this basic radar they are giving us
Damn so there’s actually no reason for me to now grind the Baz meshupar cause the F-15i is literally just better in every way
Yeah. No need to grind the both f15 and the kurnass 2k. Saves so much rp. f16d was the best israeli jet previously anyway
@@NinoPanino I’m yet to grind out the Israeli F-16C though, surely that would be better than the F-16D?
Of course we get f15 e in America but Russia gets su-34 that’s bad ass, f-18 hornet gajin
Bro calm down I just finished your previous video and you drop another one
He literally said he will make a lot of videos about the f15E and the su34 after that video if he wants to do that he can.
IM SO HAPPY
Thanks
Where are the cluster bombs that were in the leaks!!!!
thats the word: leaks
Finalmente a gaijin boton minha Livery favorita do F15 para Israel hahah eu tinha uma baixada para o Baz Mashupar agora vou usar ess aoficial
will be the best f15
So when pythom 4?
Lol soon hopefully
Once again I say leave it to gaijin to give another country the better version of a US jet
and once again, us main cry over everything
Israel normal pereonalizad every jet they buyed, they made special orders and modified the jets by itself, like the F16I-Sufa and F15s i supoused,
@@adrianfolstad4925 yes because we could receive a very similar version with the same engines but they deliberately gave the Americans the inferior version. There's no point in getting it over the Israeli one
@@sucuaranaancap9366 the US’ f15e also had stronger engines there’s no reason to add another version later with stronger engines for the US
@@sucuaranaancap9366 most US F-15Es have the 229.
I'm so glad the F15E isn't in the fighter line - Imagine having to grind out a plane that's not even an upgrade over the previous one in terms of air to air capability
I was hoping it would be in the strike line after the harrier II because i didn't do the bomber line.. guess its time to grind bombers lmao
@@BlueTurtleClips I just finished the 111F a couple of weeks ago but I thought it would be in strike line
@@bluefox9436 oh but it is. The radar is much better isn’t it??
@@ClankerWanker For air to ground yes, but for air to air the differences are... pretty minor. The F15C has already one of the best mechanical radars out there - any really noticeable improvement would have to be a PESA or AESA radar.
@@bluefox9436 well this one says 120 mile range on small targets for the strike eagle, idk if f15c should be the same but that’s certainly not what we see in game
this F15I dont have AGM65 ? or they add it later
They didnt add it, israel just didnt imploment it
historically, they didn't carry the agm65
@@isyoubaba5484 sad
Bruhh why the israeli F15 E doesn't have mavericks!?
is it worth grinding a new tech tree line just for the f15e
So the f15 is under the f111?
This comment section gonna flip with the f15sg comes with GE engines...
Dios tiene muchas armas, puede destruir un equipo enemigo 2 veces.
What is the guidance time on the glide bombs? Chinas is 300 seconds.
SDB’s get 700 seconds
In what line is it gonna be
Does the Israeli f15 come after the f16d or the meshupar?
After the F16D
python 4 im waiting
How i get GE to warthunder dev
Como você faz pra mira do pod da zoom progressivamente?
But the f15I hase no agm65 again
They should add the ability to carry 2 agm 65g + 1 agm 65d on one pilon, since 3 agm 65g are too heavy for the tripple mount, but 2 g' +1 d is possible and there is photo proof of use
BS the Real life Radar can detect none moving ground targets and is just as good if not better than the Russian Radar but in game the Russian Tree gets every thing for their Paper Vehicles and Bs Proto types
Source? Su-34 is specialized ground attacker, it's AtG capabilities will be more refined than those of F-15.
The f15e modeling is so inaccurate, it bleeds speed like crazy irl, its not nible, its heavy and fat, it can fly without the cft, which was never done in combat, like ever and so much more
@@xtodnfs549 ok just because they didn’t do it in combat doesn’t mean remove it from the game. It has that capability and it was specifically designed to. Also you’re wrong about the modeling. Coming from both the eagle and strike eagle pilots who did dogfight against each other, the strike eagle keeps up just fine
someone know i can i get access to all the vehicles in dev server?
And yet no lavi 😢
Tragic, but I’m happy with the Ra’am for now
@@batlax18 I agree
@@JonathanOfir-fs8oe I want the Lavi and Kfir C10 soon though, give us the Israeli made stuff too
Crying in no new US AA
no sure what people are talking about the us 1 is still way better at its job since you can have 6 mav plus the 20 gbus or the 9 lazer guided bombs or a mix of both thats actualy an insane cas loadout. in the pure cas role the US f15e is gonna be the new best in the game for sure
Because none of this stuff will help me in air realistic battles... Just give us the goddamn engine upgrade and the Israeli one it's ground attack capability
@@keno5839 none of that will help in air rb and also I have a pro gamer theory here. In a real match against a real team, you’re never gonna have the chance to drop so many bombs before a pantsir takes you out, at least not without the engine upgrade. I think the mavs are practically irrelevant for kill potential except for in a very theoretical game where the Russians don’t bring any pantsirs. With both of these aircraft we are beginning to see the limits of taking more payload. I highly doubt players will even take the full 20 bombs due to how much faster they could be without them, dramatically increasing survival which at the end of the day is the most important factor
@@ClankerWanker i mean i literally said in my comment it will be better in the PURE CAS ROLE air rb was not brough up cause yeah no shit better engines makes it better in air rb and your not gonna be dropping the bombs 1 at a time anyway.
@@keno5839 not trying to be rude here but please read past the first sentence. There’s this grayed out text under it that says “read more…” and when you click on it it actually reveals more words that I said to specifically address its CAS role
For some reason my account got reseted on the Dev Server, and I lost all of my researched vehicles, and have to start over, from the tutorial. 😭
Does anyone know how to solve this? (I know I should write to the support tho...)
If you have installed the Dev Server in the same file location as the normal game then it is possible that you have overwritten your game progress. At least that's what I saw in a tutorial and I don't know if you can undo it.
@@florianbruckner3130 Thanks for the answer, but I have never encountered with this before, and it was perfectly fine until this update, and both of the main folders are independent from each other.
Japan and Germany ain’t getting ish for top tier air it seems 😂
Germany needs it but Japan atm is top of the line for air to air, although would like the f2 to show up already
I don’t understand why the f15e has the worse engines and the f15I has the better engines even tho they are quite literally the same jet, that annoys me so much and I hope they fix it
F-15E - 1988
F-15I - 1998
F-15E: Produced and operated with F-100PW-220Es
F-15I: Retrofitted with -229s per Israel's request before being sold
also, do take into account the f15e can carry 6 mavericks while the israeli one cannot
@@TheArcticFoxxo Even if that's true why does the U.S get the worse version? Why not just give them the same engines? The American ones did also use the pw229 so theres really no reason to piss off the u.s community like that
@@bt_the_yank6234 Great question, I'd say to add some variety. I can bet you 100% that people would cry and bitch about the F-15I being copy/paste with less weaponry if an early '00s F-15E was implemented... Even if it were historical.
This aircraft never used -229s until VERY recently. A large majority of the thunderbolts didn't receive them until the late 2000s, and even then their F-15Es didn't receive -229s until 2022.
@@TheArcticFoxxo They started to use the 229 in 1992. According to Pratt and Whitney's own website.
Why are people soo stupid, if yoh do a quick google search you can see rhat the f15e never had the 229 engines until recently, the f15i had them from the start
And? IF it could theoretically use the same engines then why not make them the same? Why deliberately make one version worse?
@@bt_the_yank6234 because the f15e and f15ex aren't the same model???, a quick google search would tell you this
@@bt_the_yank6234because by using theoretics, you make the Ra’am worse because the lack of mavericks. The engine power is accurate and a balancer between them
The radar was upgraded to the apg 82 in 2017, why is it in the game by your logic
@@callcentrelink7021 no they didn’t, a quick google search and you can see that they had en wayyy before the Israeli f15
Find it so funny how us mains are having a mental breakdown over the fact that the engines are weaker than the israeli ones. Yet they tell anyone who complains about the flankers gimped flight model to cope 😂
The flanker’s FM isn’t gimped all that badly, it still wins in a dogfight against most planes. But then again, if you’re looking to dogfight at top tier you’re not playing it right
@christopherchartier3017 the flankers fm is definitely gimped buddy. It's oswald efficiency is much lower than it's supposed to be, it some how loses the one circle to an f16 and an f15 and it gets outrated by an f4. If the plane that's literally designed to dogfight struggles in dogfight something is very wrong.
@@Migthunder Flanker is literally a missile boat COPE
@@MigthunderI think that’s just the instructor limiting it. In sim it wins most dogfights
@@christopherchartier3017 that's mainly because of R-73s, the issue with the flanker is that it's losing speed without providing any visible nose authority, but this was fine during the R-27ER era cause it was "balanced" the missiles made up for the lack of performance had it been fixed earlier the flanker would be quite literally unbeatable in any engagement (with how it's missiles were implemented in game). But for balance they gave it a worse FM.
The same will probably apply to the f15e and f15I they are definitely gonna nerf the energy retention you just cannot pull 11gs while gaining speed fully horizontal, that's literal UFO logic.
The seemingly nerfed for no reason eagle
What?
@@FXIIBeaver they made it less maneuverable with the worst engine to "make sens since it's the striker and not fighter varient"
@@leotsering US mains have to cry about something I guess.
They didn't?
@@leotsering What do you mean "they made it less maneuverable"? The F-15E is inherently sluggish with its added weight.
Its engine is the only engine it had used, up until 2022.
once again another country gets a better jet than the actual american one.
F-15I, best top tier jet???
Best F15, that’s for sure. After all the neglect of Israel with the worst F16 and F15, to now the best of both is pretty funny
Japan cas nooooo:/
Do the Israelis not know how to use AGMs? It would be nice to have them as an option and not just GBUs.
no AGMs on the I, but it does have GBU-39s which could be decent at SEAD
Israel has a few native agms, but they face the same issues the brimstone has, namely loal and too much range for war thunder
HI
still using aim120 A bummer
How to make shit original aircraft or missile from originated
what?
I mean it was in service when just sparrows were around, so imagine they added the initial version with just the aim 7m