2023 DACIA JOGGER E-TECH 140 HYBRID 141 PS TOPSPEED NIGHT POV DRIVE WÜRZBURG (60 FPS)(GPS)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
- NIGHT POV DRIVE with 2023 DACIA JOGGER E-TECH 140 HYBRID 141 PS Topspeed
LOCATION: Würzburg, GERMANY
NIGHTPOV by Michi
#daciajogger #nightdrive #foryou #fyp
![Eminem - Somebody Save Me (feat. Jelly Roll) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Vwa0HenQMi4/mqdefault.jpg)
GRAZIE MILLE BELLLISSIMO VIDEO !!!
Good video!!!! ,👍
Thank you :)
Thank you. Really interesting video.
Thank you ;)
I will buy my Jogger hybrid to drive more in eco and B gear not as a racing car and also to take of in silence and having a automatic gearbox as well as so much space in the rear. It will work very nicely for camping trips that's what its all about. 😊
Thank you. Looks nice.
And some complain that a 3 cylinder engine is weak , slow , people just bla bla bla without driving it , bravo Renault 😊
This is 4 cylinder, clasic 1.6 with aditional 2 electric motors (HYBRID)
To add to the apparently irrelevant argument, if n e 1 thinks 3 cylinder’s can only suk… look at the GR Corolla! 🫢
my sandero step way 3 cylinder is going good i get to 180 km/u fast
Hello and good test ! I want to know if the Jogger is noisy ? Thanks
Thank you! Yes is very noisy: 100kmh - 63db - 120kmh 65db
The headlights not full LED??
no just partially LED
in Germany its €2500 chipper than in belgium
fuel consumption 120kmh? 140kmh?
100kmh 7.8L
120kmh 8.1L
140kmh 10.8L
All not hybrid Mode!
And consumption 120 kmh? 140 kmh? In hybrid mode?
@@nightpovcars7021this is not aligned with all other tests on the web.
Wie hoch war der Verbrauch???
Who buys a hybrid car for power?
Power = consumption
If you want power and not care about consumptoon buy petrol sport car.
In city a sport car consumes 15% and a hybrid 3%.
I thought it was limites to 160!
Slower that the Jogger 1.0 ECO-G :( (Don't seem to be 141ps)
Jogger eco is 100 ps
at what speed does the petrol engine kick in?
on our test drive it kicked in on 40 km/h, but we didnt use the eco mode. I heared it kicks in at 70 with that eco mode.
Its so noisy, isnt it?
Test drove one yesterday, excellent car but leg room in the back is seriously small and for me that’s a show stopper, an otherwise great car.
Yeah it’s really unfortunate. It doesn’t fit three small boosters across the back either. I went down to my local showroom to check both of these. Was left disappointed. Will stick to my Old Ford Galaxy for another year or two. I hear the Dacia Bigster could be a winner though in terms of size.
I’m 6’2 btw. With my seat fully back I’d be crushing the person in the back.
@@murphyebass7837 I’m 5’ 11” and in my driving position (my ankle on the floor when foot on the brake) there is 4” legroom behind the driver seat. Totally unusable! Shame. Not heard of the Bigster, assuming it’s bigger 😂
I can agree, i would've gotten that car but i couldn't even get into the back of that car being 6 feet. Big showstopper.
@@thewhitepanda60 absolutely. It’s a crying shame tbh. Had potential but a monumental fail imo. The rumoured “bigster” looks to be more akin to a Skoda Kodiaq which could be an interesting one to watch
@@murphyebass7837 absolutely, but 2025 is still far away.. and the Bigster is a SUV so I'm guessing it's 20% larger with 5% more space. I'd still get it tho
Sen son sürat yapmadınki böyle gitmek ile sadece şehir turu attın
Man nennt Ihn den Würzburg-Raser.
Very slow
to slow
city car only
Pentru tine. Alții vor merge cu ele la drum în alte țări bine mersi.
@@LuciTulcea Cu nume Dacia Jogger oltrî seneme goltu în sema tos.
It consume fuel as russian old tank
Yeah, 5,5 l on average. Then better a Dodge Ram.
@@BartyBartface 5,5liter only if you drive it slowly but then others will consume same too
I tink you understand wrong 5,5 ltr on 100 km so it's 1ltr on 18 km.
And thats not bad.👍🤗
@@frits183 if you drive it carefull and half drive are on battery but battery are empty pretty quickly and for higher speeds its not working
This is why the russians are burning german leopard tanks in Ukraine 😂😂