I'm a little jealous of myself in this video being back in Toronto. I did have a thought, indulge me. I have too many vintage 50mm lenses, should I do a giveaway? Yes or NO down below and GO!
The day I shot the lens giveaway (Sunday) was so miserable and rainy that I had a hard time going out and getting broll. I had to re-think how I was going to do that part ;)
Hey you may have already been corrected but that version of the lens is not radioactive. The Takumar 50mm 1.4 is only radioactive in the seven element Super Takumar variant of the lens. Super Multi Coating got rid of the thorium in the coatings. But I heartily agree all the versions can bring it as far as image quality, lens hood is not an option though if shooting outside in the daytime. Nice video Mark.
"... a testament to how well it was made, or how well it was kept." I guarantee that it's 95% to do with how well these were *made*. Pretty much 19 out of 20 old Takumars of various makes that you pick up today, be it from a collector or out of bargain pile, they mostly *all* still focus like butter and only a select few even have hesitant apertures. Asahi made some kick. ass. glass.
Man it is soooo nice to have someone with your video editing and creative skills, making content about vintage lenses. This was really awesome. Thanks for highlighting this legendary Tak.
Thanks Tim! I sincerely believe in these lenses though. They're a fantastic way to get into photography, go back to the basics on the fun part (not the cost part) of shooting film. Doing these videos just brings me back to when I was a kid and would shoot videos for myself. There's something heavily satisfying with conceiving, shooting and publishing an idea. As much as I LOVE editing and that process on a professional level, i'm finding myself wanting to be more involved in the production side and this is an easy way to satisfy that!
That Takumar is/was my favorite lense back in 2006 while shooting my Konica Minolta 7D. I loved it so much, I purchased 2 of them. The prices have risen since then. I didn't expect that. I also have a Tak 35mm and a 135mm, not sure what the aperture is but they were great too. I don't use them much more these days but I will get back to them because of your vid.
Mirrorless made shooting with these a lot easier I think could be the biggest reason for that. The Tak prices except for the more limited available ones seem to be somewhat stable at this point. Canon, Contax Zeiss prices are definitely still on the rise though.
My favorite characteristic of this lens is it's warmth. It has a very earth tone feel to it- I wish I had a better way to describe it. Skin tones are amazing too.
The radioactive yellowing I suspect. Someone told me How to get rid of it with UV lights but I like it enough to keep it. I feel the exact same way you do! :) I also love how these lenses feel when you focus, but I’ve always been a manual focus guy so that’s always been important for me.
Considered the finest 50mm 1.4 lens when new, Pentax sold more of these lenses than any others except the less costly 50mm 1.8. While popular with collectors, there were so many of them that there should be no problem finding them today. The lanthium glass element tended to yellow over time, effecting color photos, and the end of the 42mm thread mount in the 70s meant that there were few cameras to take them later, so there has not been a big user demand. There are several methods reported to reverse the yellowing of the "hot" glass element which can be found on the web.
Unfortunately not. I switched to k bayonet in 84 and to Nikon in 98. Now I have a Canon. In between i had countless bodies including a medium format Mamiya.
I have the 55mm1.4 and I use it as one of my main portrait lenses with a regular adapter on my Fuji...On my Olympus I use it with a focal reducer adapter which puts it around an 85mm full frame equivalent in both!
Yes sir $10 for everything, I almost shit my pants when I saw it. Whoever had it took great care of the whole kit, bag and all. When I opened the camera up the lens was just covered with case dust and best part was a roll of film was in it and ready to shoot from the first or second frame. I was looking for a tripod and ran out with this like I stole it lol. I used to have a good selection of smc tak glass when I had a K-3 but sold it to persue something else, but here I am again getting into photos again.
@@jsdhesmith2011 START THE CAR!!!!! START THE CAR!!!! That Ikea advert where the price is so good it feels like you're stealing it. I got my Canon 814az camera that way, paid $60 bucks for it, MINT condition,leather case ALL accessories and works like a charm. Online it's about $350. You find these things in the weirdest places. When they present themselves JUMP on it! I'm jealous mate. Good for you!
I had this lens on a Honeywell (Asahi) Pentax. In the 1960s. I was a complete newby. So I did understand just how good it was. I used it with Kodak Kodachrome 25. I never equaled the sharpness till I started to use a Pentax 67 with Fuji velvia! Absolutely stunning lens.
I was lucky enough to find a late model m42 version of this lens without the thoriated back element so I don't have to worry about yellowing. It's my favorite fifty. Beautiful colors, nice bokeh, lots of character.
Just an awesome video Mark really enjoyed everything you said was spot on.. I'm no pro with a camera but I was lucky enough to stumble on a ton of lenses at a thrift store a few years ago so I bought the works for $100 3 milk crates full and there is a lot of really neat lenses and a whole bunch of these Tak's at all different sizes! If don't already have a Helios 44-2 you should add it to the collection I liked mine so much I bought a spare! lol
Thanks mate! Ya I think just about anyone can love these lenses, there’s a lot to love. I actually have a 44-2 and I love it as well. Going to review it this spring, just waiting for the weather and scenary to transition from Ugly spring to colourful spring heheh.
Well... I just managed to pick up one of these yesterday...along with the 28mm 3.5 I can't wait to get out there and try them out. I think I'm developing a vintage lens problem.
Great video... second one that I have checked out on your channel today. I'm currently shooting and in love with the Auto Sears 55mm f1.4. I have experienced similar qualities with your Takumar 50mm f1.4. I didn't realize that I had not subscribed to your channel Mark, but that issue has been fixed. Just subscribed and smashed the gray notification bell :-) Be well and stay encouraged!!!
@@MarkHoltze No worries Mark... I enjoy your channel and reviews. Since posting my last comment I purchased a Takumar 50mm f/1.4. Love it :-) Be well and stay encouraged!!!
@@cjmorris2491 Hello from Tampa Florida! I really don't have a preference, even though I have several Auto Sears lenses, like the 28mm, 55mm, and 135mm. They are all excellent, but I love saying "Super-Takumar!" I only own one... Sad! Be well!!!
@@cjmorris2491 I have both I'm leaning to the auto Sears. I just bought the 8 element Tak and I still think i like the Sears better. It has a distinct look and it is sharp. The bokeh is incredible too. I haven't done extensive tests side-by-side.I think I also have a personal attachment to the 55 mm because it was my first vintage lens about 6 years ago.
Sweet. You make it seem easy. A $45 lens is even more encouraging. OK I am almost hooked. I need to just buy the Nikon Z6 and I will be on my way. On my way to one of those vintage camera sales. I will need a wide, 100mm, and 200mm. I already have a 50 1.4 that is super nice. Thanks for making these videos.
That’s awesome Doug! Great lenses! I haven’t used them on a crop sensor before but I’m sure they’re just as good! Mirrorless features really make manual control a breeze!
@@MarkHoltze you know what, hell gates are open for me with all these vintage lenses coming up everyday! I recently made up my mind to get Contax Zeiss MMJ primes and then I stumbled on your Takumar 50mm 1.4 which led to another glass called Super-Multi-Coated "SMC" Takumar 50/1.4 !! and all the sudden Helios 11-2 (58mm f2) , Olympus Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 and Minolta MC Rokkor-X 58mm f / 1.2 MC Lens came down the road!! I am so mixed up and I no longer know which is good for me to grab? any quick advice will be highly appreciated since I can't get my hands in any single one of those lenses? P.S: I'm planing to through these lenses on a Black magic pocket cinema camera 4K with EF Speedbooster
It's funny in the sun it doesn't flare much at all. It's super clean, it's the night time stuff (like the light spots) where it flares like that. You can block it out early enough and use a hood, but the night time test shots had some super interesting flairing that can be used in interesting ways. Because this is the SUPER MULTI COATED it's got much better flare reduction coating that some other vintage stuff. It's still super cool either way! Thanks as always Rodrrico, stay tuned for a give away ... shhhh...going to give away a dope X that's Y ;)
I only use my f/1.4 50mm or 55mm lenses for portraits and usually shoot them wide open or pretty close to wide open. I especially like the Sears Auto 55mm f/1.4 made by Tomioka. This lens is exceptionally nice when adding flash to outdoor portraits in order to separate the subject from the BG. My one gripe with the Sony A6500 is the 1/4000 maximum shutter and 100 as the lowest ISO that can be selected. This combination makes it a bit difficult to shoot wide open in bright conditions without using an ND filter. A 1/8000 shutter speed along with a sub 100 ISO capability would allow me to shoot wide open... Looks like I "might" get an A7iii. However, the 50 or 55mm lenses suck for head and shoulders portraits when using a full frame camera. I do have the Sony 85mm f/1.8 lens as well as some other vintage lenses in focal lengths decent for portraits with full frame cameras such as the Meyer Optik 135mm f/2.8 lens with its 15 blade aperture.
Hi Mark, I think the 8 - its an early rubber grip model (f16) I think ‘72 -‘75 era? It has a touch of the “Fukishima Glow” too! Needs a spell in the sun. I might light some fires with it. ;0)
The 8 element is actually not radioactive lol...it also goes for like 3x the price (cult following). Images aren’t much better. You still have a banger!
Depends on the size of your sensor really. Typically anything between 20-50 would work well for landscape. Composition and what you like would be the deeper thing you’d need to Figure out for yourself, style wise.
I have a Contax Zeiss I almost never use because of this lens. I would argue the build quality is much better but I might get beat up for saying something to the wrong group of people ;)
amigo tengo una pregunta, tengo ese lente, que otro lente de 24 , 28 o 30mm me recomienda que yo pueda convinar con este Takumar 50mm 1.4? le agradezco. friend I have a question, I have that lens, what other 24, 28 or 30mm lens do you recommend that I can combine with this Takumar 50mm 1.4? I thank you.
Helios has more "charm" and can be found cheaper I think. This has better build quality and performs more like a modern lens....it's a tough call, if you go Takumar you MIGHT collect them all, so be warned ;)
Great video!. I shoot with these old Takumars all the time and love them. I have 7 or 8 50's and the one your showing in the video is the one I'm missing! lol. I have the Super Takumar and the SMC Takumar 1.4 though and they are both great lenses. I also have the Super-Takumar 55 1.8 which is a really good lens (and also radioactive). I actually prefer shooting with a couple of these old lenses over some of my Canon L-Series Glass! I have a near mint Takumar 85mm f/1.8 that I carry with me all the time, it's one of my all time favorites to shoot with and the image quality is beyond amazing. I have an old 50 f/1.2 that is quite fun and the backgrounds are one of a kind and rather mind blowing. Great to see another Vintage Takumar Shooter!!!!
Thanks Jim! OK! So the Tak 85 I'm currently obsessing with. I'm trying to hold out for the vintage camera sale coming...WAIT! You did a video on the 85! I watched your video on the 85!!! THANK You for that video on the 85 and i'm totally subscribed to you! lol! Okay sorry I had a moment of realization mid sentence there! SO close to getting one and ye Tak's are now my favourite vintage. The build quality and optics really can't be beat at the price you can get them for..although i'm starting to think if more people catch on the prices will go up! So shhhhhh (Tak's suck man....right? Wink wink nudge nudge say no MORE!. Thank you for your video on the 85, I enjoyed it! PS: go check out my latest for a chance to win a Canon FD with a cine-mod. Or if you have too many 50's I can understand that. Take care Jim!
Yes, I've watched the prices go up drastically just in the last couple of years. I've got a nice range of Takumars and a rather large collection of Pentax K-mount lenses. (I prefer the Takumars!) There's really only a few I'm really looking for to finish out my collection, one is a 35mm... I've got the Takumar 35 f/3.5 but want the faster one that's an f2. If you get your hands on the Tak 85f1.8 you'll be lovin' it!!!!!!!!!!! The SMC Pentax 85mm f/2 is also a badass lens that I love using. It's a bit more punchy than the 1.8 Tak, (but I prefer the TAK!)
I’ve heard good things about the 55 actually. But I’m not sure how it stacks up 1:1. Have to read up on it, or maybe you do a review? I need to see if you have done one. I’d like to see a 55 review.
I have been using it on the original EOS M, but I have the a6300 that I sold ages ago coming in the mail again as I miss the 4K. I'll see how it pairs with the A6300.
Not at all. I’ve flown with this lens, it got full swabbed, they get shipped from Japan globally and all around all the time. Have no fear, the radiation levels are not harmful. Flying with lithium ion batteries are far more dangerousz
My Takumar came with the lens hood with a built in filter and a short extension tube on the rear . The first time used the lens I couldn't get it focus as I didn't realize it had the tube on the rear I was so short I thought it was part of the lens, once I took it off it was fine and since shoot Pentax cameras all need is the M42 screw mount to PK adapter
Hi Mark! I really like your videos and wish you luck! May I ask, I read, that it's possible the radioactive lens could destroy camera sensor? do you have any experience or some info? thanks for your adwise. Adam
Hi Adam, been using my A7sii since 2015 with some radioactive lenses and no damage to it so far. I don’t keep my lenses on the camera indefinitely, but no issues.
Hello Mark, can you point me the tutorial you mentioned on using my 8 element Super Takumar 50mm F4 (or any vintage lens for the matter) in Manual Mode using the Peaking Settings on say... a Sony a6600? I can't seem to find a decent mention/tutorial (for a beginner on using vintage lens on APS-C cameras) it seems as if I need to preset settings in order to use the Takumar and a6600 together also, how do you spot a fake Helios-44m-7 2/58mm for M42 mount? It appears that there are many fakes but that the fakes may actually be superior knock offs to the original even if they are fakes (go figures)
@@MarkHoltze Thank you so much Mark! Also, I kind a pieced together late last night (with some success, on focusing and producing really sharp images with my 8 Element Super Takumar 50mm 1.4) however, I really need to have a better understanding as to how I actually did it? Your tutorial should help that effort significantly... Cheers! PS The camera flea market you went to in Toronto I saw on RUclips? Made me wonder why I never did that here in New York City and, once this biological challenge we're all going through has ended, the first thing I'm going to do is find one just like the one you had in Toronto (fingers crossed!!!) Peter Rozie Jr
Mark hello. I have my 50 1.4 in my hands. I am very happy. Serial number 1393172, Has 6 blades. IR to the right of 4, protruding element at infinity. No point at the place of 2, M A instead of AUTO MANUAL. I think It is the 8 element Planar Killer version. Excellent condition. For the time I have the D700 with me in China . I have an M42 adaptor. Please do you know if the mirror is hit if mounted on the D700?
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh!! It does sound like the Planar KILLER 8 element! Also non - radioactive! I'm not sure off hand, I'll have to look into it. I think for the MOST part the M42 mounts are okay on Nikon's, but I can't say for sure as I don't use one. I'll see if i can find out and get back to you!
Thank you for writing back. Other funny news with the rest of my lenses are. I also received the SMC 135 f/2.5 6 element 43812. surely the 6 element. It looks a mint lens and aperture works beautifully. But listen to this. I CAN NOT TAKE OFF THE REAR LID. IMPOSSIBLE. Looks like it is stuck or the lens is fake xaxaxa.
No doubt, it is a very good lens even by todays standards. It is also true that is quite overrated and surely not a Zeiss killer. Being a Pentaxian since the late 70s, I had the opportunity to try almost all the normal Taks and Pentaxes and still prefer the 55mm f1,8 version.
Ya just stop down if you don’t want that wide open “look”. The kens at F2 is wonderful and with digital sensors it’s not a big deal to comp for the very small amount of light loss.
😂 thanks Jennifer! The “boring mystery box” came pretty close! That will be after the lens and it’s not boring, but I had a bit of a bias ;) Thanks so much for the compliment by the way, giveawa GO!
Hi Mark, As both a fan of the Takumars and your channel what do you think about making a video about the difference in quality (light transmission etc.) between a thorium-yellowed takumar and a takumar that has had uv light treatment? I am giving one of my 50mm 1.4’s this treatment at the moment and I don’t remember having seen an online comparison somewhere. At least not in Mark Holze style :-)
It’s a tricky comparison. There are devices that do this scientifically but mine would just be based on light readings from cam and not sure they’re accurate enough or evident enough to really be conclusive. There is def a light diff but I’ve gone and UV exposed my 50 so the yellow is pretty much gone. :)
Hi Mark, to you know the Takumar 55mm 1.8 ? It's available for 90 dollar in Switzerland. I am on a GH5 and building up my set... I got a Konica Hexanon 50mm 1.7 but yet too shoot with it... might be too similar, should find a 35mm Takumar.... love your channel Thanks.
You will usually find these attached to bodies! Usually when you see them you can get the combo for like $20 because most people don't know the value of the lens. Shhhhh don't tell ;)
Thanks for the video! I am really keen on getting one of these now. Do you have any idea if there is a difference between the lenses that say Super Takumar SMC and the once that say Super Multi Coated Takumar? This might be a bit picky but just wondering. Thanks!
It's not picky at all mate, the SMC has a specialized coating on the lens to help reduce flaring. The differences are fairly minor really. It's also a bit newer than the simple Super Takumar. It's like a version II or III of a lens series.
Amazing video... I've done a lil research on this lens but I'm not sure if I want to buy this one or the helios 44-2. They both have their own unique characteristics and its just a matter of choosing.
You really can't go wrong for either of those. It's just a question of finding one easily. I had no idea about Tak's until I tested them out at that vintage camera convention back in OCT. I liked them so much I bought two, I wanted the 35mm and 85mm as well but I didn't have enough cash. Stay tuned, 50 give away (probably going to be my Canon FD 1.7 that's SIM-MODDED) ...SPOILER alert ;). Time to give back to you guys for being loyal and sharing in the love and appreciate of vintage photography.
It's a vintage camera sale. One of a number of them that happen in Toronto area a few times a year. It IS paradise! Bought all my best stuff there. I've got two videos on it: Pentax Takumar Jackpot and "Best place to buy vintage". Has all the info and more goodness in there if you want to check out :)
Haha good eye mate and yes worldwide for sure. You guys are worldwide and I want to exclude no one. So far one for yes! Any more takers lol ;) When I do it you’ll know so don’t worry. :) thanks for taking the time to watch and comment mate.
Happy to hear it mate. I'm having fun with it, but always want to make sure there is some valuable takeaway in the video. RUclips for me has always been about learning. I always said "you can find out about anything on youtube" I wish I had it back in high school to help me with factoring quadratic equations...that crap drove my parents crazy trying to teach me and it ruined my math grade trying to figure it out. lol I wonder why i didn't go into a mathematics field ;)?
because you're so good at editing dude! I'm a video editor and I learn tons from your videos. even though I found you through a vintage lenses video. instantly subscribed
Good to hear Khaled! Huge part of I think what makes us successful in this field is to always be learning. I think the moment the learning ends it's time to move on, but I think that's what makes any form of creative expression interesting is you learn so much through the process that you want to apply to your next project. :) Anyway appreciate your support Khaled!
lol, she's the best! Probably the only reason we were excited to come home...because the weather here still sucks. I'm on the hunt for an 85mm1.8 (tak) i've got a few i'm watching but there is a premium on this lens vs all of the other Takumar's. I wonder if it's because it's rare or what, like $400 USD vs $150
I recently lost one 85/1,8 on our local Craig's list variant, I wasn't fast enough, damn... It would cost me about only $200, converted. I guess there's not to many of them, those who have it are avoiding local markets, everything goes straight to e-buy, for much higher price of course...
There are 4 versions of this lens , this link is for the 8 element lens that is not radioactive and it the sharpest of the bunch and the most wanted . www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/Super-Takumar-50mm-F1.4-Early.html at 2:05 your showing a adapter for your camera . That adapter is moving the lens to far away from the sensor and that changes everything . Here is the mount you want to get . This is for a pentax camera with a k mount ,see how thin it is . You want to keep the lens as close to the original distance as you can . The farther away you mount the lens the bigger the images will become and it also changes the DOF. The distance of 50 mm from the sensor to the lens will be more like 70mm with that adapter your using . Keeping it the same distance as it was made for is the best . It will also let more light into your sensor . Look at this photo of the adapter on the lens . www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Pro-Lens-Mount-Adapter/dp/B001G4LOCC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1538857174&sr=8-1&keywords=pentax%20to%20m42%20adapter.
Hi Steve, thanks so much for the detailed comment. Appreciate it mate. The M42 to NEX (Sony E mount full frame mirrorless) only comes with an adapter this big. It's Fotodiox so it's the same brand as the one you linked. I'm assuming they've made it the appropriate distance from the camera body sensor to make it work and allow infinity focus etc. I have a EOS to M42 adapter and it's similar to the one you've linked, a screw mount that goes right at the back of the lens without any distance separation. I'm wondering it if all is relative to where the sensor is relative to the end of the lens. I've done some side by side tests with my 6DII and A7SII with their respected adapters and the only real difference I've noticed is it was harder to find a perfect focus on the DSLR vs the Mirrorless. I'll take a closer look, but Fotodiox doesn't seem to sell similar adapters for the Sony E mount that have the same profile as the one you linked.
Thanks for responding Mark! I'm glad I've been turned on to vintage lenses, non coated and coated. The pictures are beautiful, and the cost, well you already know!!! Great video. Thanks again. 👍🏾
Not really a need for when you have the 55 1.8, but for collectors sake.... absolutely yes! The 55 1.8 should also perform slightly better in some things than the 50 1.4 (7 element version).
Same to you mate. I’ve done a few 35 reviews but the super multicoated 35 F2 is a good all rounder. Small, good quality build and optical, fairly cheap price wise and works well on fujifilm bodies
Ok thanks I think my problem was I had the adapter for version 1 after I saw your video I ordered the correct one I wasn't able to focus to infinity until I removed the black flange inside the adapter now I can although my aperture adjustments are now to the right side of the adapter but I'll work around that Lol thx
It’s sooooo good and for the price you cant go wrong.! Spent the weekend doing a review on the SMC 85 1.8...its my favourite vintage lens now but for very specific stuff. Also costs a lot Moreno so it’s not really a fair comparison ;)
Hello Mark, just want to get your opinion about these vintage lenses. I got interested into vintage lenses through your channel few years ago before i got my first camera. Fast forward, finally got my camera ( A7iii), now want my first vintage, a mir 1b 37mm. My only concerns are radioactive glass. Should i be worried or not? Cheers.
37 isn’t radioactive so you’re good there. The sun is far more damaging than these lenses, I don’t want to convince you one way or the other, I feel that’s something that’s very subjective and do what feels comfortable. A lot of very bad info out there saying these are very dangerous, but they’re not. Biggest damage they can do is simply distort perception based on bad information. That said, I urge you to do some research on your own if you don’t feel Comfortable. Just be mindful of the information sources.
@@MarkHoltze Thanks again Mark. So true about misinformation, based on some of my own research, there's conflicting arguements. You currently own quite a few of these radioactive lenses, how many do you own? Especially this Takumar 50mm 1.4, which i'm also keen to buy. Could list some 85mm and 135mm vintages, be it radioactive or not. Thanks so much for your reply, cheers.
@@whaitebranco3400 I own a few yes, the 50 1.4 8 element Super Takumar (not multicoated) isn't radioactive, the auto takumar's aren't either I don't believe, which came before SUPER takumar. The 85mm 1.8 i think is very lightly thoriated but i've seen conflicting information with that one that i'm just going to leave in as maybe. Mine has zero yellowing but that could have been the dealer UV light exposing to reduce the colour imprint the older thoriated glass leaves. The 135's F/2 and 3.5's are not radioactive, neither is the 35mm F/3.5, the 35mm F/2 is. The soviet lenses are not thoriated at all, so you could get the Tair 11 135 and Jupiter 9 85 and get those focal lengths on clean glass. Minotla Rokkor's are also not radiated as long as they're ROKKOR variants. Hope that helps
Hi, just subscribed because I think you produce quality contents and because I'm looking for info about vintage lenses. Can I ask you what's the difference between Takumar 50mm 1.4 and Super Takumar 50mm 1.4? Thanks!
Hi Michelangelo, thanks mate I appreciate it. To answer your question, I don't believe just a standard "takumar 50mm 1.4" exists on it's own. To my knowledge (I could be wrong) there are 3 versions. The Super Takumar 50mm 1.4 which was made between 1965 to 1971 and the SUPER Multi Coated Takumar (which has lens coatings to help improve flaring performance) produced between 1971-1972. There are TWO versions of the SMC (Super Multi Coated) as well, the third has 8 lens elements (making it the strongest of the three optically). If you're looking at any of them, I would aim for the SMC as it has substantially better optics than the standard version. Hope that helps mate.
@@MarkHoltze thanks! Actually I meant SMC Takumar as an alternative to Super Takumar, my mistake! According to your advice, I will go to SMC Takumar, thanks again!
No problem mate! Go for 8 element if you can. Put it in your search and the appropriate ones will pop up. Look for fungus, make sure it doesn’t have any). Other than that you should be good.
I have just bought a super takumar 55/1.8 for my eos 1D mk2, bought 2 adapters without flange and all i get is error 01 (lens connection error) i taped over the contacts no difference on both adapters, what i have noticed is if i turn the adapter all the way in till it clicks and locks i get the error ! if i turn the adapter nearly all the way in as in i can see part of the pin just about to drop into the adapter hole all works fine ! camera is in AP mode, is there a fix for this or am i doing something wrong ? Love your vids Mark keep them coming.
Fantastic review and wonderful presentation ..if only there was a double thumbs up option! BTW I have four iterations of this lens (if two 55s count) but I just love watching other people's opinion of old lenses :-) Subbed.
Dude you are FAST! 50mm is just the focal length. Depends on the sensor, these lenses were used on 35mm SLR cameras which the digital equivalent is a "full frame sensor". Canon 6DMi and MII, 1DXMII, 5D, Sony A7 series etc. If you have an APS-C sensor there is going to be a bit of a crop factor introduced. Micro 4/3'rds sensor is a bigger crop. So 50mm on a full frame DSLR/Camera will be true...ASP-C would be 50mm x 1.6 which would mean this lens is closer to an 80mm focal length.
I pulled some glitch elements from old tapes and just key frame them in using “overlay blend” mode in premiere. There are templates you can get for this that work with edit software. Some places for free. We can talk about that more when you are ready. It’s somewhat advanced.
I own one of these as well but grow ever more apprehensive about the radioactive properties. We gotta get someone whose area of study is in the heath effects of radiation to make a statement on this. Check out the Geiger counter tests on simons utak or zenotography.
Thanks Prince! Honestly there aren't many draw backs with this lens, none that I see personally. Some people don't like shooting manual but I can't honestly say that is a problem for me. The image quality, build quality paired with my mirrorless camera is just magic....all for $50 ;) You can't go wrong. Just means you need a bit more time shooting wide open portraits with this lens which make shooting sports, kids or action difficult ;)
Mark Holtze I see your point. Thanks for clarifying. That can definitely be a drawback for some. I actually don't mind manual for portraits, landscape, astrophotography, and abstract. Unless, I'm shooting wildlife, kids, sports, and lightning. I wish the lens of today were built like the ones in the past. You have inspired me to try a vintage lens. I picked up a SMC Pentax-M 1:1.7 50mm Asahi and a Yashica 50mm 1:1.7. Not sure which one is the better of the two, or if they are even good at all, lol.
No problem, I mean modern lenses are GREAT! But they're expensive, prohibitively so for people who are wanting to explore photography but can't afford the gear. There is a difference shooting with slow zooms and fast primes, for me fast primes are where the fun is. Primes are just overall sharper because less moving parts/glass and being able to really isolate the subject and mess with the background bok is a lot of fun. Also shooting in low lighting conditions. The lenses really are only limited to what you can do with them. For me the Super MC Takumar's are the BEST value for the buck. Built REALLY solid, great ergonomics. I Just picked up an 85mm 1.8 recently (the most expensive vintage lens I've purchased to date...but there is a premium on almost anything 85mm) and it's just mind blowingly good. You on instagram at all? Would love to follow along and see some of your results.
Mark Holtze I agree you're absolutely right. I wish I had known about that prior to buying my first lens. Which is a Sony SELP18105G E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS. I have my eye on a Sigma 16mm. I heard it is really sharp. Are you going to be making a video about this 85mm? Also, have you messed with any macro extension tubes? I have been thinking of buying some. My Instagram is princeharbinger I will be uploading more photos soon as I have 5000 in Lightroom that I have to edit. Most of what you will see is from an S8+. I just brought my A6300 about a month ago.
As I say never regret the purchase of a lens. I'll be making a video on the 85 for sure, i'm just finishing up my lens giveaway and a Premiere Tutorial now (my time this week has been limited) then the vintage sale which will motivate the 85mm review. So unless I get side tracked...iw should be the 3rd video in the next three :) I've been taking it out to use it, I want to do a proper review on it so every day this week at work i'm shooting pictures going in and coming out. Going to use it for some B-Roll stuff on my next video as well. Just to get that well rounded feel. I haven't messed with extension tubes, although i've heard they will bring the 1:2 pentax 100MM Macro to a 1:1 so that's cool. Just not something i'm in the market to buy right now. Have you?
I've stubled across many Pentax Ashai lenses in various flea markets, but never something like this 50! Mostly 70-200s and once an interestin 100mm 2.8, but I'll keep my eyes open for a 50 like that ;)
OHH 70-200!!!! That vintage camera sale I was at back in OCT had SO SO SO many! 35 1.8, 85 1.4, 200mm F4...so many I wanted them ALL, but alas cash only and thankful otherwise I would have walked away spending more than I did...although for two Tak's $150 (macro 100mm F4 and 50 1.4) was a hell of a good deal IMHO.
Hey quick question I have the same screw mount but when I attempted to screw the fotodiox adapter on to my A7rII the aperture blades lock up and it doesn't allow me to tighten it all the way tried two separate fotodiox adapters it's weird because I see yours goes on without a hitch I really want to get this to work to see how this reacts on my camera
I think you need to set the lens to auto or off auto. I know that problem but forget exactly how I fixed it. There is a button on the lens somewhere I think. Or a switch. I don’t know the lens you are using but my taks and others all work fine. The FD’s I had to fiddle with to get it to work. I’m pretty sure it’s the auto thing. But seeing it would help.
@@MarkHoltze it's actually the exact same one because on the back it has the two tabs one sticking up and one that appears to be bent down and then the actual pin I even paused the video when you turned so I know it can work I thought it was just the adapter
I found a Pentax Super multi coated 50mm 1.4 but it does not say Takumar? I have never seen a lens like this for pentax. Is says made in Japan but no Takumar label? Anybody seen one and what are your thoughts? I found it for a really good price...Thanks!!
@@ekphotography More recent version, yours is a newer version of the lens vs the one in this review. A lot of changes happened I think, it's debatable amongst the followers of this lens which one is better. I honestly couldn't care less about the nuances of what makes a lens better than the last, but I do care what you DO with that lens ;) Sounds like you got a good deal mate, go out and make magic with it.
Jamaica 🇯🇲 Nice! That lens looks like a lot of fun! Also, yes to a giveaway. That would be a fun opportunity. Great vid and have fun on your holiday 👍 ☀️ 🏖
Thanks Buenos Diaz! Alright another YES for a giveaway! This should be fun! The lens is fantastic, you guys probably have loads of cool vintage photograph/film stuff where you are no? Thanks so much for watching mate, we had a good time! Unfortunately back to reality now and we're celebrating days that are above the mark where water freezes ;). Looking forward to summer now, hot hot summer!
Mark Holtze Awesome, glad you had a super trip! Reality is always a good thing. There are tons of vintage and photography shops in my area of Southern California but a giveaway is always fun and exciting. Regardless, I’m close to purchasing a film camera 📷 I did t appreciate film as much when I was younger and want to learn more. Also being able to shoot photos/video on a vintage lens is exciting and a learning opportunity 👍
Funny enough you mention film...about 15 mins ago cleaning the basement I found my old light meter. still works, I've got some 2003 expired 400 kodak film and my dad's 35mm SLR I'm going to go have a little fun with. I agree with you not appreciating it more when I was younger, I've always loved motion film and picked up a Super 8mm film camera (canon 814az) thing is BOSS! I just need some cool content to shoot cause it's an expensive process. What camera are you looking at?
I really wanted to buy it because it’s a great lens, but I didn’t feel confident with that. So I bought a Pentax M 50 mm 1.7, that it’s a good lens but not Takumar.......
Without wanting to sound to over the top Mark, I really love your style, especially in these kind of reviews/gear vids. Really glad I checked back in to watch this, but you totally make me want to vintage glass again!! Seriously tho dude. Absolutely love the vid, and more than a little jealous of Jamaica!!!
Awe thanks mate! I really appreciate the sentiment. It's an interesting creative exercise trying to find a style that works, that's not too close to what's been done by bigger youtubers. It's a funny process and indulge me here if you will. When I'm shooting I never feel like I'm getting enough. Working as an editor for so many years ( i use to shoot a lot more, but once you get to this level of cutting it's pretty dedicated work). In the edit I would ask myself often "how did they not shoot this and that" you always find away around it, but you forget sitting in the edit how chaotic production is. Shooting things out of order, chasing daylight or location/actor union limitations etc etc. Everything takes longer in production and often you're shooting things out of sync so it's very easy to miss details and feel confident you have everything. Even sitting in the edit knowing what I use and what I throw away, feeling I've gotten to a point where I could shoot super efficiently...the moment I get out there and start shooting I feel the exact same feeling of insecurity that I had in my early days of shooting...what people on set feel on the shows I work on (some of them). I never feel truly comfortable with the stuff I work on until i've messed about with it in the edit. One thing i've learned is not to rush it. There's some serious creative value in letting the "edit speak to you" as I like to call it. Deadlines for work etc are always looming, but you find a way to buy this time. It's where new ideas spring up based on the material you have. It's a really interesting thing. You are probably aware of it yourself, but some of my best ideas or problem solving moments have come whilst outside of the edit. Walking/running/bathroom/shower/going to sleep etc. You guys have a great style as well, the natural banter you have between the two of you is fantastic. It's so much easier to let your own creative work inspire you vs trying to copy someone else's style. Anyway HUUUUUGE diatribe there, apologies if it's a bit incoherent. Finding a style and that process I think is a super interesting topic of discussion for me. Love hearing peoples creative processes, how ideas come, how they execute them, what they do when they don't workout. I'll end it there lol....ifyou've made it this far! Thanks again for the kind words!
Have you verified this one as "hot" personally? I've always been under the impression that the Super-Multi-Coated Takumars (as you have here) were not hot, while some of their Super Takumar predecessors were.
You can see it in the thumb pretty hard. I first noticed it when comparing shots to the pentacon 50 the same frame shot had a warmer grade to it. I would UV remove it but I kind of like it aesthetically.
I have an SMC Tak 50/1.4 without yellowing and a Super Takumar with. The Super does not get used on any film camera with colour film loaded, but I'll use it on DSLRs because I can adjust the white balance to compensate for the yellowing, and with B&W film because it almost acts as a cheap yellow filter and the colour cast is irrelevant. The SMC Tak has near-permanent residence on my Spotmatic F, because body and lens can talk to each other for open-aperture metering similar to the Pentax K mount and other modern systems. (My DSLRs are all Pentax, and with one early-model exception they have in-body stabilisation.)
Mark Holtze the jema its an m42 e mount so it meters open aperature on many of my L series prakticas (which dont "feel" as solid as sau a pentax nikon or mamiya sekor of the same period but 40+ years later stil work fine)
I can't promise it won't, but don't worry...it's cheap! If anything stuff like this will increase the value of it so get in soon ;). You at the beach today? Or that place that costs 40 quid (eden? - i forget the name) Cornwall GO!
Mine no longer can focus :( there's a dent, the aperture rotation no longer works. That's how I got it when someone I know gave it to me :p I wonder if I can this beautiful lens fixed up.
Ohhh that’s so annoying. Some of these lens gurus can do great work, might be cheaper to find another one though. You should check some online takumar groups and inquire within. Some guys can do it all.
@@MarkHoltze yeah that's what I thought too. I'm in Vancouver and hopefully I can find somewhere that could fix it but doesn't break my wallet. But I also found some online DIY tutorials, nothing to lose either :p
@@MarkHoltze amazing lens, but I have one question. For the moment I have the helios 44 and the Takumar 1.4, I'm thinking about buy the Canon 1.2. do you think that is a good improvement or the Takumar is good enought?
@@Alefeeeee Which Canon? The 55 1.2 or the 50 1.2? I mean the only reason to get the 1.2 is the fact it's a 1.2. I don't think it will REALLY do a lot for you in terms of being inspired, but who knows. You can never "have too many 50's" ;).
Are you sure the radiation isn't harmful? I was under the impression that it can be, and you ought to take care to avoid pointing the rear (or even front) elements at your face and store them in drawers far away from where you usually are.
Everything I have read about it from reliable sources tells me it is. Of course it’s not up to the individual to make the call themselves but based on what I know, I’m not overly concerned.
'before everybody gets out' that was the giveaway. anyways I shot some stuff today in chiang mai with the 50mm takumar and a Jupiter 85mm f2. love your vids God bless
Geiger counters are cheap enough today. Dont think because the affordable ones "cant detect alpha"... yes, they are not sensible to alpha (kalium 40 of banana,...), but they can detect it partially as well, just only somewhat precise, they are sensible to beta and gamma which is also part of the decay products of thorium (so the geiger counter WILL detect it and probably even scream) It doesnt matter anyways since its safe, but considering you dont have any yellowing on the back element, you either have a non radioactive or just slightly radioactive version (thoriated front element)
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm a little jealous of myself in this video being back in Toronto. I did have a thought, indulge me. I have too many vintage 50mm lenses, should I do a giveaway? Yes or NO down below and GO!
yes you should
The day I shot the lens giveaway (Sunday) was so miserable and rainy that I had a hard time going out and getting broll. I had to re-think how I was going to do that part ;)
oh lol
just excited for summer! ;)
Hey you may have already been corrected but that version of the lens is not radioactive. The Takumar 50mm 1.4 is only radioactive in the seven element Super Takumar variant of the lens. Super Multi Coating got rid of the thorium in the coatings. But I heartily agree all the versions can bring it as far as image quality, lens hood is not an option though if shooting outside in the daytime. Nice video Mark.
"... a testament to how well it was made, or how well it was kept."
I guarantee that it's 95% to do with how well these were *made*.
Pretty much 19 out of 20 old Takumars of various makes that you pick up today, be it from a collector or out of bargain pile, they mostly *all* still focus like butter and only a select few even have hesitant apertures. Asahi made some kick. ass. glass.
By the way... want less flare and more contrast, use a hood. They're cheap.
Ya going to go ahead and agree with you here, outright! Appreciate the comment!
Appreciate the vid. :) Your production is majestical.
Thank you very much! Love this stuff so I try to do it justice :)
Man it is soooo nice to have someone with your video editing and creative skills, making content about vintage lenses. This was really awesome. Thanks for highlighting this legendary Tak.
Thanks Tim! I sincerely believe in these lenses though. They're a fantastic way to get into photography, go back to the basics on the fun part (not the cost part) of shooting film. Doing these videos just brings me back to when I was a kid and would shoot videos for myself. There's something heavily satisfying with conceiving, shooting and publishing an idea. As much as I LOVE editing and that process on a professional level, i'm finding myself wanting to be more involved in the production side and this is an easy way to satisfy that!
Mark Holtze We are all the beneficiaries of this project of yours so I say more power to ya. :)
Appreciate that Tim!
That Takumar is/was my favorite lense back in 2006 while shooting my Konica Minolta 7D. I loved it so much, I purchased 2 of them. The prices have risen since then. I didn't expect that. I also have a Tak 35mm and a 135mm, not sure what the aperture is but they were great too. I don't use them much more these days but I will get back to them because of your vid.
Mirrorless made shooting with these a lot easier I think could be the biggest reason for that. The Tak prices except for the more limited available ones seem to be somewhat stable at this point. Canon, Contax Zeiss prices are definitely still on the rise though.
My favorite characteristic of this lens is it's warmth. It has a very earth tone feel to it- I wish I had a better way to describe it. Skin tones are amazing too.
The radioactive yellowing I suspect. Someone told me
How to get rid of it with UV lights but I like it enough to keep it. I feel the exact same way you do! :) I also love how these lenses feel when you focus, but I’ve always been a manual focus guy so that’s always been important for me.
Mine somehow has no yellowing so it might not be a radioactive copy. I will check its serial number later.
YES! I'm starting to get a bit of a vintage lens problem - and I need to be enabled.
Enable mode ON
Considered the finest 50mm 1.4 lens when new, Pentax sold more of these lenses than any others except the less costly 50mm 1.8. While popular with collectors, there were so many of them that there should be no problem finding them today. The lanthium glass element tended to yellow over time, effecting color photos, and the end of the 42mm thread mount in the 70s meant that there were few cameras to take them later, so there has not been a big user demand. There are several methods reported to reverse the yellowing of the "hot" glass element which can be found on the web.
Hi Randall! Thanks for the fantastic info! I sincerely appreciate it!
long before you was born, in 81, i started my journey in photography with this lens and a pentax spotmatic sp2/ great lens nd a legendary camera!
I would have been 1 then ;)...what a wonderful combo to get you started my friend! Do you still have it?
Unfortunately not. I switched to k bayonet in 84 and to Nikon in 98. Now I have a Canon. In between i had countless bodies including a medium format Mamiya.
Funny how it’s all sort of coming around again. No point hanging onto stuff you don’t use.
Thanks for sharing your story Amon!
That lens is NUKING! Well done Mark and the vintage lens looks cool on a new Sony too!
I have the 55mm1.4 and I use it as one of my main portrait lenses with a regular adapter on my Fuji...On my Olympus I use it with a focal reducer adapter which puts it around an 85mm full frame equivalent in both!
I picked up a Pentax spii with 200mm and this lens for $10 at the thrift today. Can't wait for my adapter to shoot these on my 5D!
OH my GOD $10!?!?!!? You could sell it online RIHGT now for $75 lol. You won't want to once you give it a try on your Canon though!
Yes sir $10 for everything, I almost shit my pants when I saw it. Whoever had it took great care of the whole kit, bag and all. When I opened the camera up the lens was just covered with case dust and best part was a roll of film was in it and ready to shoot from the first or second frame. I was looking for a tripod and ran out with this like I stole it lol. I used to have a good selection of smc tak glass when I had a K-3 but sold it to persue something else, but here I am again getting into photos again.
@@jsdhesmith2011 START THE CAR!!!!! START THE CAR!!!! That Ikea advert where the price is so good it feels like you're stealing it.
I got my Canon 814az camera that way, paid $60 bucks for it, MINT condition,leather case ALL accessories and works like a charm. Online it's about $350.
You find these things in the weirdest places. When they present themselves JUMP on it! I'm jealous mate. Good for you!
I had this lens on a Honeywell (Asahi) Pentax. In the 1960s. I was a complete newby. So I did understand just how good it was. I used it with Kodak Kodachrome 25. I never equaled the sharpness till I started to use a Pentax 67 with Fuji velvia! Absolutely stunning lens.
I was lucky enough to find a late model m42 version of this lens without the thoriated back element so I don't have to worry about yellowing. It's my favorite fifty. Beautiful colors, nice bokeh, lots of character.
That’s great! How can you tell is there a serial number to keep an eye out for? Any other markings?
Thanks mate
Just an awesome video Mark really enjoyed everything you said was spot on.. I'm no pro with a camera but I was lucky enough to stumble on a ton of lenses at a thrift store a few years ago so I bought the works for $100 3 milk crates full and there is a lot of really neat lenses and a whole bunch of these Tak's at all different sizes! If don't already have a Helios 44-2 you should add it to the collection I liked mine so much I bought a spare! lol
Thanks mate! Ya I think just about anyone can love these lenses, there’s a lot to love. I actually have a 44-2 and I love it as well. Going to review it this spring, just waiting for the weather and scenary to transition from
Ugly spring to colourful spring heheh.
Well... I just managed to pick up one of these yesterday...along with the 28mm 3.5
I can't wait to get out there and try them out. I think I'm developing a vintage lens problem.
Great video... second one that I have checked out on your channel today. I'm currently shooting and in love with the Auto Sears 55mm f1.4. I have experienced similar qualities with your Takumar 50mm f1.4. I didn't realize that I had not subscribed to your channel Mark, but that issue has been fixed. Just subscribed and smashed the gray notification bell :-) Be well and stay encouraged!!!
Thanks mate! Sorry for the delay, notifications for messages haven’t been on the ball lately!
@@MarkHoltze No worries Mark... I enjoy your channel and reviews. Since posting my last comment I purchased a Takumar 50mm f/1.4. Love it :-) Be well and stay encouraged!!!
@@jacobchristianglover3655 Do you prefer one over the other? Sears 55mm vs Takumar 50mm.
@@cjmorris2491 Hello from Tampa Florida! I really don't have a preference, even though I have several Auto Sears lenses, like the 28mm, 55mm, and 135mm. They are all excellent, but I love saying "Super-Takumar!" I only own one... Sad! Be well!!!
@@cjmorris2491 I have both I'm leaning to the auto Sears. I just bought the 8 element Tak and I still think i like the Sears better. It has a distinct look and it is sharp. The bokeh is incredible too. I haven't done extensive tests side-by-side.I think I also have a personal attachment to the 55 mm because it was my first vintage lens about 6 years ago.
Sweet. You make it seem easy. A $45 lens is even more encouraging. OK I am almost hooked. I need to just buy the Nikon Z6 and I will be on my way. On my way to one of those vintage camera sales. I will need a wide, 100mm, and 200mm. I already have a 50 1.4 that is super nice. Thanks for making these videos.
Mirrorless is definitely the best camera type for these old lenses. DSLR's can have focus infinity issues with certain lenses and focal lengths.
Was just given this lens and a 28mm 3.5 in an old camera bag, love these on my gh5
That’s awesome Doug! Great lenses! I haven’t used them on a crop sensor before but I’m sure they’re just as good! Mirrorless features really make manual control a breeze!
newer lenses lack true beauty, they feel very clinical, nice vid man!
Love how these old lenses handle. The weight, the focus throw, all of it. Glad to see someone else who appreciates that as well. :) thank you!
what a great lens, you still have one of those Mark?
I do, using it to shoot a few scenes in my next video ;)
@@MarkHoltze you know what, hell gates are open for me with all these vintage lenses coming up everyday!
I recently made up my mind to get Contax Zeiss MMJ primes and then I stumbled on your Takumar 50mm 1.4 which led to another glass called Super-Multi-Coated "SMC" Takumar 50/1.4 !! and all the sudden Helios 11-2 (58mm f2) , Olympus Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 and Minolta MC Rokkor-X 58mm f / 1.2 MC Lens came down the road!! I am so mixed up and I no longer know which is good for me to grab?
any quick advice will be highly appreciated since I can't get my hands in any single one of those lenses?
P.S: I'm planing to through these lenses on a Black magic pocket cinema camera 4K with EF Speedbooster
Really solid Mark! I think that lens flare looks fantastic, you are making me consider finding some vintage glass of my own.
It's funny in the sun it doesn't flare much at all. It's super clean, it's the night time stuff (like the light spots) where it flares like that. You can block it out early enough and use a hood, but the night time test shots had some super interesting flairing that can be used in interesting ways.
Because this is the SUPER MULTI COATED it's got much better flare reduction coating that some other vintage stuff. It's still super cool either way!
Thanks as always Rodrrico, stay tuned for a give away ... shhhh...going to give away a dope X that's Y ;)
I only use my f/1.4 50mm or 55mm lenses for portraits and usually shoot them wide open or pretty close to wide open. I especially like the Sears Auto 55mm f/1.4 made by Tomioka. This lens is exceptionally nice when adding flash to outdoor portraits in order to separate the subject from the BG.
My one gripe with the Sony A6500 is the 1/4000 maximum shutter and 100 as the lowest ISO that can be selected. This combination makes it a bit difficult to shoot wide open in bright conditions without using an ND filter. A 1/8000 shutter speed along with a sub 100 ISO capability would allow me to shoot wide open...
Looks like I "might" get an A7iii. However, the 50 or 55mm lenses suck for head and shoulders portraits when using a full frame camera. I do have the Sony 85mm f/1.8 lens as well as some other vintage lenses in focal lengths decent for portraits with full frame cameras such as the Meyer Optik 135mm f/2.8 lens with its 15 blade aperture.
Just snagged one of these for £56 in superb condition. Now I’m all set to get irradiated!
That’s amazing! You will love this lens no doubt! So good at night! Do you know if you got the 7 or 8 element version?
Hi Mark, I think the 8 - its an early rubber grip model (f16) I think ‘72 -‘75 era? It has a touch of the “Fukishima Glow” too! Needs a spell in the sun. I might light some fires with it. ;0)
My bad, looks like its a 7 element....
The 8 element is actually not radioactive lol...it also goes for like 3x the price (cult following). Images aren’t much better. You still have a banger!
Thanks, I hope so - drumming my fingers waiting for an adapter currently. I’m also wrapping my head with tinfoil !!
Another great video Mark, thanks- tempted, tempted!!...........
Hi. great videos. What is the best vintage lens for landscape photography. Thanks
I kind of begin to like Pentax super multi coated lenses.
Depends on the size of your sensor really. Typically anything between 20-50 would work well for landscape. Composition and what you like would be the deeper thing you’d need to
Figure out for yourself, style wise.
I have sonya6000 camera
I love the Takumars too.
I have a Contax Zeiss I almost never use because of this lens. I would argue the build quality is much better but I might get beat up for saying something to the wrong group of people ;)
amigo tengo una pregunta, tengo ese lente, que otro lente de 24 , 28 o 30mm me recomienda que yo pueda convinar con este Takumar 50mm 1.4? le agradezco.
friend I have a question, I have that lens, what other 24, 28 or 30mm lens do you recommend that I can combine with this Takumar 50mm 1.4? I thank you.
I think 🤔 this may be my next lens this or the Helios 🤔🤔🙏🏾🙏🏾😂👍🏾
Helios has more "charm" and can be found cheaper I think. This has better build quality and performs more like a modern lens....it's a tough call, if you go Takumar you MIGHT collect them all, so be warned ;)
This. That is if it's not too late.
Just stumbled upon your channel Mark! Keep up the great work. Looking forward to seeing more videos from you :)
Thanks so much mate! Appreciate it.
Great video!. I shoot with these old Takumars all the time and love them. I have 7 or 8 50's and the one your showing in the video is the one I'm missing! lol. I have the Super Takumar and the SMC Takumar 1.4 though and they are both great lenses. I also have the Super-Takumar 55 1.8 which is a really good lens (and also radioactive).
I actually prefer shooting with a couple of these old lenses over some of my Canon L-Series Glass! I have a near mint Takumar 85mm f/1.8 that I carry with me all the time, it's one of my all time favorites to shoot with and the image quality is beyond amazing.
I have an old 50 f/1.2 that is quite fun and the backgrounds are one of a kind and rather mind blowing.
Great to see another Vintage Takumar Shooter!!!!
Thanks Jim! OK! So the Tak 85 I'm currently obsessing with. I'm trying to hold out for the vintage camera sale coming...WAIT! You did a video on the 85! I watched your video on the 85!!! THANK You for that video on the 85 and i'm totally subscribed to you! lol!
Okay sorry I had a moment of realization mid sentence there! SO close to getting one and ye Tak's are now my favourite vintage. The build quality and optics really can't be beat at the price you can get them for..although i'm starting to think if more people catch on the prices will go up! So shhhhhh (Tak's suck man....right? Wink wink nudge nudge say no MORE!.
Thank you for your video on the 85, I enjoyed it!
PS: go check out my latest for a chance to win a Canon FD with a cine-mod. Or if you have too many 50's I can understand that.
Take care Jim!
Yes, I've watched the prices go up drastically just in the last couple of years. I've got a nice range of Takumars and a rather large collection of Pentax K-mount lenses. (I prefer the Takumars!)
There's really only a few I'm really looking for to finish out my collection, one is a 35mm... I've got the Takumar 35 f/3.5 but want the faster one that's an f2.
If you get your hands on the Tak 85f1.8 you'll be lovin' it!!!!!!!!!!! The SMC Pentax 85mm f/2 is also a badass lens that I love using. It's a bit more punchy than the 1.8 Tak, (but I prefer the TAK!)
Jim Durfee
I have the Takumar Multi-coated 55mm f1.8 which I adore. Would the 50mm f1.4 SMC be better optically or not? Cheers.
I’ve heard good things about the 55 actually. But I’m not sure how it stacks up 1:1. Have to read up on it, or maybe you do a review? I need to see if you have done one. I’d like to see a 55 review.
I have been using it on the original EOS M, but I have the a6300 that I sold ages ago coming in the mail again as I miss the 4K. I'll see how it pairs with the A6300.
I've just ordered this lens in ebay. Is there a possibility that mail services return it to the seller because of the radioactivity?
Not at all. I’ve flown with this lens, it got full swabbed, they get shipped from Japan globally and all around all the time. Have no fear, the radiation levels are not harmful. Flying with lithium ion batteries are far more dangerousz
My Takumar came with the lens hood with a built in filter and a short extension tube on the rear . The first time used the lens I couldn't get it focus as I didn't realize it had the tube on the rear I was so short I thought it was part of the lens, once I took it off it was fine and since shoot Pentax cameras all need is the M42 screw mount to PK adapter
Hi Mark! I really like your videos and wish you luck! May I ask, I read, that it's possible the radioactive lens could destroy camera sensor? do you have any experience or some info? thanks for your adwise. Adam
Hi Adam, been using my A7sii since 2015 with some radioactive lenses and no damage to it so far. I don’t keep my lenses on the camera indefinitely, but no issues.
Hello Mark, can you point me the tutorial you mentioned on using my 8 element Super Takumar 50mm F4 (or any vintage lens for the matter) in Manual Mode using the Peaking Settings on say... a Sony a6600? I can't seem to find a decent mention/tutorial (for a beginner on using vintage lens on APS-C cameras) it seems as if I need to preset settings in order to use the Takumar and a6600 together also, how do you spot a fake Helios-44m-7 2/58mm for M42 mount? It appears that there are many fakes but that the fakes may actually be superior knock offs to the original even if they are fakes (go figures)
Hi Peter, the video I do that is here:
ruclips.net/video/LNU9SvcEyxI/видео.html
Hope that helps mate.
@@MarkHoltze Thank you so much Mark! Also, I kind a pieced together late last night (with some success, on focusing and producing really sharp images with my 8 Element Super Takumar 50mm 1.4) however, I really need to have a better understanding as to how I actually did it? Your tutorial should help that effort significantly...
Cheers!
PS The camera flea market you went to in Toronto I saw on RUclips? Made me wonder why I never did that here in New York City and, once this biological challenge we're all going through has ended, the first thing I'm going to do is find one just like the one you had in Toronto (fingers crossed!!!)
Peter Rozie Jr
does the lens have a crop factor due to the adapter?
Nope, it’s clean.
@@MarkHoltze thanks, i apreciate that you've answered!
NP :)
Awesome videos man, any idea what the focal range would be if I paired this lens with the M42-Micro 4/3 adapter on my GH5?
Micro is 2.2 x crop so 50mm x 2.2 = about 110mm
Can i know where you buy the adapter pentax to sony
online, amazon? Not sure where ou are, but links are in the description. M42 to E (NEX) or pentak K to E. Google it at worst.
Well done! What kind of adapter you use to get from m42 to mount ?
M42 to Sony (NEX) mount. I use Fotodiox.
@@MarkHoltze Again thanks a lot! Looks like the Fotodiox m42 to FX Fuji is hard to find in Germany.
Mark hello. I have my 50 1.4 in my hands. I am very happy. Serial number 1393172, Has 6 blades. IR to the right of 4, protruding element at infinity. No point at the place of 2, M A instead of AUTO MANUAL. I think It is the 8 element Planar Killer version. Excellent condition. For the time I have the D700 with me in China . I have an M42 adaptor. Please do you know if the mirror is hit if mounted on the D700?
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh!! It does sound like the Planar KILLER 8 element! Also non - radioactive!
I'm not sure off hand, I'll have to look into it. I think for the MOST part the M42 mounts are okay on Nikon's, but I can't say for sure as I don't use one.
I'll see if i can find out and get back to you!
Thank you for writing back. Other funny news with the rest of my lenses are. I also received the SMC 135 f/2.5 6 element 43812. surely the 6 element. It looks a mint lens and aperture works beautifully. But listen to this. I CAN NOT TAKE OFF THE REAR LID. IMPOSSIBLE. Looks like it is stuck or the lens is fake xaxaxa.
No doubt, it is a very good lens even by todays standards. It is also true that is quite overrated and surely not a Zeiss killer. Being a Pentaxian since the late 70s, I had the opportunity to try almost all the normal Taks and Pentaxes and still prefer the 55mm f1,8 version.
The 55 1.8 seems to be a bit more 'usable' in all sorts of situations, whereas the 1.4 is just a big blowout fest if the light isn't quite right.
Ya just stop down if you don’t want that wide open “look”. The kens at F2 is wonderful and with digital sensors it’s not a big deal to comp for the very small amount of light loss.
Awesome video man! YES do a giveaway haha and btw I dig your intro so much :))
😂 thanks Jennifer! The “boring mystery box” came pretty close! That will be after the lens and it’s not boring, but I had a bit of a bias ;)
Thanks so much for the compliment by the way, giveawa GO!
I used Asahi Pentax for many years and the lens that most impressed me was the SMC Takumar 135mm f 3.5 ... sharpness and excellent "Bokeh".
I’m testing the 5 vs 6 element 135 2.5 SMC takumar right now. Will do the 3.5 separate but wanted to see how the 5 vs 6 element handled head to
Head.
i have the same lense and I absolutely love it!
Hello, I want to buy the super takumar 50mm 1.4 and I want to compare it with the canon 50mm 1.4 lens, which do you think is of better quality.
Hi Mark,
As both a fan of the Takumars and your channel what do you think about making a video about the difference in quality (light transmission etc.) between a thorium-yellowed takumar and a takumar that has had uv light treatment? I am giving one of my 50mm 1.4’s this treatment at the moment and I don’t remember having seen an online comparison somewhere. At least not in Mark Holze style :-)
It’s a tricky comparison. There are devices that do this scientifically but mine would just be based on light readings from cam and not sure they’re accurate enough or evident enough to really be conclusive. There is def a light diff but I’ve gone and UV exposed my 50 so the yellow is pretty much gone. :)
Hi Mark, to you know the Takumar 55mm 1.8 ? It's available for 90 dollar in Switzerland. I am on a GH5 and building up my set... I got a Konica Hexanon 50mm 1.7 but yet too shoot with it... might be too similar, should find a 35mm Takumar.... love your channel Thanks.
My brother bought a Pentax film camera with this lenses attached at a thrift shop and he gave it to me
You will usually find these attached to bodies! Usually when you see them you can get the combo for like $20 because most people don't know the value of the lens. Shhhhh don't tell ;)
Thanks for the video! I am really keen on getting one of these now. Do you have any idea if there is a difference between the lenses that say Super Takumar SMC and the once that say Super Multi Coated Takumar? This might be a bit picky but just wondering. Thanks!
It's not picky at all mate, the SMC has a specialized coating on the lens to help reduce flaring. The differences are fairly minor really. It's also a bit newer than the simple Super Takumar. It's like a version II or III of a lens series.
Thanks!@@MarkHoltze
just recently p/up 1 of these from a local pawn shop for 49.99 & i'm luving it on my sony a72
Hell yes! Great deal!
Amazing video... I've done a lil research on this lens but I'm not sure if I want to buy this one or the helios 44-2. They both have their own unique characteristics and its just a matter of choosing.
You really can't go wrong for either of those. It's just a question of finding one easily. I had no idea about Tak's until I tested them out at that vintage camera convention back in OCT. I liked them so much I bought two, I wanted the 35mm and 85mm as well but I didn't have enough cash.
Stay tuned, 50 give away (probably going to be my Canon FD 1.7 that's SIM-MODDED) ...SPOILER alert ;).
Time to give back to you guys for being loyal and sharing in the love and appreciate of vintage photography.
4:28 Where is that place? Is it in paradise?
It's a vintage camera sale. One of a number of them that happen in Toronto area a few times a year. It IS paradise! Bought all my best stuff there. I've got two videos on it: Pentax Takumar Jackpot and "Best place to buy vintage". Has all the info and more goodness in there if you want to check out :)
Thanks. If I ever visit Canada, this is my number one place to go :D
You won't be disappointed ;)! :)
Hell yes please do a giveaway! and Please make it worldwide! :D
and also, dat mongoose at 1:47 ;)
Amazing stuff and edit!
Haha good eye mate and yes worldwide for sure. You guys are worldwide and I want to exclude no one. So far one for yes! Any more takers lol ;)
When I do it you’ll know so don’t worry. :) thanks for taking the time to watch and comment mate.
Absolutely my pleasure mate! lots of love and keep teaching us!
Happy to hear it mate. I'm having fun with it, but always want to make sure there is some valuable takeaway in the video. RUclips for me has always been about learning. I always said "you can find out about anything on youtube" I wish I had it back in high school to help me with factoring quadratic equations...that crap drove my parents crazy trying to teach me and it ruined my math grade trying to figure it out. lol
I wonder why i didn't go into a mathematics field ;)?
because you're so good at editing dude! I'm a video editor and I learn tons from your videos. even though I found you through a vintage lenses video. instantly subscribed
Good to hear Khaled! Huge part of I think what makes us successful in this field is to always be learning. I think the moment the learning ends it's time to move on, but I think that's what makes any form of creative expression interesting is you learn so much through the process that you want to apply to your next project.
:) Anyway appreciate your support Khaled!
Like for the dog :-) And of course for the lens, which is also the hottest one in my vintage lens collection...
lol, she's the best! Probably the only reason we were excited to come home...because the weather here still sucks. I'm on the hunt for an 85mm1.8 (tak) i've got a few i'm watching but there is a premium on this lens vs all of the other Takumar's. I wonder if it's because it's rare or what, like $400 USD vs $150
I recently lost one 85/1,8 on our local Craig's list variant, I wasn't fast enough, damn... It would cost me about only $200, converted. I guess there's not to many of them, those who have it are avoiding local markets, everything goes straight to e-buy, for much higher price of course...
There are 4 versions of this lens , this link is for the 8 element lens that is not radioactive and it the sharpest of the bunch and the most wanted . www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/Super-Takumar-50mm-F1.4-Early.html at 2:05 your showing a adapter for your camera . That adapter is moving the lens to far away from the sensor and that changes everything . Here is the mount you want to get . This is for a pentax camera with a k mount ,see how thin it is . You want to keep the lens as close to the original distance as you can . The farther away you mount the lens the bigger the images will become and it also changes the DOF. The distance of 50 mm from the sensor to the lens will be more like 70mm with that adapter your using . Keeping it the same distance as it was made for is the best . It will also let more light into your sensor . Look at this photo of the adapter on the lens . www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Pro-Lens-Mount-Adapter/dp/B001G4LOCC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1538857174&sr=8-1&keywords=pentax%20to%20m42%20adapter.
Hi Steve, thanks so much for the detailed comment. Appreciate it mate. The M42 to NEX (Sony E mount full frame mirrorless) only comes with an adapter this big. It's Fotodiox so it's the same brand as the one you linked. I'm assuming they've made it the appropriate distance from the camera body sensor to make it work and allow infinity focus etc.
I have a EOS to M42 adapter and it's similar to the one you've linked, a screw mount that goes right at the back of the lens without any distance separation. I'm wondering it if all is relative to where the sensor is relative to the end of the lens.
I've done some side by side tests with my 6DII and A7SII with their respected adapters and the only real difference I've noticed is it was harder to find a perfect focus on the DSLR vs the Mirrorless.
I'll take a closer look, but Fotodiox doesn't seem to sell similar adapters for the Sony E mount that have the same profile as the one you linked.
I live in Japan and own a Super Takumar 50mm f1.4 8 elements version. I really like the old lens bokeh.
Same! Lots of old gems in your beautiful country! Almost everything I find online comes from Japan :)
Cool video!
Thanks! Looking forward to any new products you guys are unveiling at NAB!
We've got some cool new stuff to show off! Will we see you there? We'll be at booth C9511.
Looking forward! I’ll try to go next year, cant make the schedule work this year. You guys in Toronto for anything soon?
We generally don't do shows in Canada, but maybe we'll make it up there someday.
That’s okay we usually come to you guys ;)
Takumars are great lenses! Love the flaring.
Agreed on both accounts! Often I try to incorporate the flare into my shots when inspired :)
Thanks for responding Mark! I'm glad I've been turned on to vintage lenses, non coated and coated. The pictures are beautiful, and the cost, well you already know!!! Great video. Thanks again. 👍🏾
@@usewisdom My pleasure, I love the discussion down here :).
👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾@@MarkHoltze
If I already have the 55mm f1.8, is there any reason I should also consider the 50mm f1.4 while building out my set?
Not really a need for when you have the 55 1.8, but for collectors sake.... absolutely yes!
The 55 1.8 should also perform slightly better in some things than the 50 1.4 (7 element version).
Question, how do you determine or know which of the 50mm 1.4s are 8 blade iris or 7? Is there a way to tell?
The super multicoated versions have 8 blades, the super Takumars have 6
Great video I got mine from the thrift store for $5.00 and it came with the metal hood...I like your miniature tripod who is it made by
$5?!!! Wow, you got a real great price on that!! Congrats!
Mark Holtze what's the name of Yur lil tripod
Oh that’s the Manfrotto mini pod. It’s fantastic!
Mark Holtze thanks
happy new year which which 35mm vintage would recomend for my fuji xpro 2
Same to you mate. I’ve done a few 35 reviews but the super multicoated 35 F2 is a good all rounder. Small, good quality build and optical, fairly cheap price wise and works well on fujifilm bodies
@@MarkHoltze ok thanks how about the
MINOLTA MD W.ROKKOR 35mm f/1.8 MF Wide Angle SLR lens
And. Tt sttisan 35mm
@@MarkHoltze whats the Carl Zeiss Jena 29mm f2.8 MC like?
great video , thx for explaining
My pleasure Ronny. :)
Are your able to focus to infinity with that adapter?
Hi, yes infinity focus is good. I don’t seem to have a problem on the mirrorless system. I have to test it out more on my dslr though.
Ok thanks I think my problem was I had the adapter for version 1 after I saw your video I ordered the correct one I wasn't able to focus to infinity until I removed the black flange inside the adapter now I can although my aperture adjustments are now to the right side of the adapter but I'll work around that Lol thx
that view in the begining wow
Ya it was worth getting up so early to see that. It gets pretty busy around 9:30 :)
I bought it too!!! I LOVE SO MUCH TOO... :) all the best
It’s sooooo good and for the price you cant go wrong.! Spent the weekend doing a review on the SMC 85 1.8...its my favourite vintage lens now but for very specific stuff. Also costs a lot Moreno so it’s not really a fair comparison ;)
Hello Mark, just want to get your opinion about these vintage lenses. I got interested into vintage lenses through your channel few years ago before i got my first camera. Fast forward, finally got my camera ( A7iii), now want my first vintage, a mir 1b 37mm. My only concerns are radioactive glass. Should i be worried or not? Cheers.
37 isn’t radioactive so you’re good there. The sun is far more damaging than these lenses, I don’t want to convince you one way or the other, I feel that’s something that’s very subjective and do what feels comfortable. A lot of very bad info out there saying these are very dangerous, but they’re not. Biggest damage they can do is simply distort perception based on bad information.
That said, I urge you to do some research on your own if you don’t feel
Comfortable. Just be mindful of the information sources.
@@MarkHoltze Thanks again Mark. So true about misinformation, based on some of my own research, there's conflicting arguements. You currently own quite a few of these radioactive lenses, how many do you own? Especially this Takumar 50mm 1.4, which i'm also keen to buy. Could list some 85mm and 135mm vintages, be it radioactive or not. Thanks so much for your reply, cheers.
@@whaitebranco3400 I own a few yes, the 50 1.4 8 element Super Takumar (not multicoated) isn't radioactive, the auto takumar's aren't either I don't believe, which came before SUPER takumar. The 85mm 1.8 i think is very lightly thoriated but i've seen conflicting information with that one that i'm just going to leave in as maybe. Mine has zero yellowing but that could have been the dealer UV light exposing to reduce the colour imprint the older thoriated glass leaves.
The 135's F/2 and 3.5's are not radioactive, neither is the 35mm F/3.5, the 35mm F/2 is.
The soviet lenses are not thoriated at all, so you could get the Tair 11 135 and Jupiter 9 85 and get those focal lengths on clean glass. Minotla Rokkor's are also not radiated as long as they're ROKKOR variants.
Hope that helps
@@MarkHoltze Thanks again mate, helps a lot.
Appreciate your feedback. Have good day. See you soon on your channel.
My pleasure good luck!
Hi, just subscribed because I think you produce quality contents and because I'm looking for info about vintage lenses. Can I ask you what's the difference between Takumar 50mm 1.4 and Super Takumar 50mm 1.4? Thanks!
Hi Michelangelo, thanks mate I appreciate it. To answer your question, I don't believe just a standard "takumar 50mm 1.4" exists on it's own. To my knowledge (I could be wrong) there are 3 versions. The Super Takumar 50mm 1.4 which was made between 1965 to 1971 and the SUPER Multi Coated Takumar (which has lens coatings to help improve flaring performance) produced between 1971-1972. There are TWO versions of the SMC (Super Multi Coated) as well, the third has 8 lens elements (making it the strongest of the three optically).
If you're looking at any of them, I would aim for the SMC as it has substantially better optics than the standard version.
Hope that helps mate.
@@MarkHoltze thanks! Actually I meant SMC Takumar as an alternative to Super Takumar, my mistake! According to your advice, I will go to SMC Takumar, thanks again!
No problem mate! Go for 8 element if you can. Put it in your search and the appropriate ones will pop up. Look for fungus, make sure it doesn’t have any). Other than that you should be good.
I have just bought a super takumar 55/1.8 for my eos 1D mk2, bought 2 adapters without flange and all i get is error 01 (lens connection error) i taped over the contacts no difference on both adapters, what i have noticed is if i turn the adapter all the way in till it clicks and locks i get the error ! if i turn the adapter nearly all the way in as in i can see part of the pin just about to drop into the adapter hole all works fine ! camera is in AP mode, is there a fix for this or am i doing something wrong ? Love your vids Mark keep them coming.
Fantastic review and wonderful presentation ..if only there was a double thumbs up option! BTW I have four iterations of this lens (if two 55s count) but I just love watching other people's opinion of old lenses :-) Subbed.
Does 50mm mean more than full frame lens?
Dude you are FAST! 50mm is just the focal length. Depends on the sensor, these lenses were used on 35mm SLR cameras which the digital equivalent is a "full frame sensor". Canon 6DMi and MII, 1DXMII, 5D, Sony A7 series etc. If you have an APS-C sensor there is going to be a bit of a crop factor introduced. Micro 4/3'rds sensor is a bigger crop.
So 50mm on a full frame DSLR/Camera will be true...ASP-C would be 50mm x 1.6 which would mean this lens is closer to an 80mm focal length.
Okay. Also how did you do the glitching at 2:31? It looks really cool imo.
I pulled some glitch elements from old tapes and just key frame them in using “overlay blend” mode in premiere. There are templates you can get for this that work with edit software. Some places for free. We can talk about that more when you are ready. It’s somewhat advanced.
Okay. Thanks for sharing
Anytime Kyle!
I own one of these as well but grow ever more apprehensive about the radioactive properties. We gotta get someone whose area of study is in the heath effects of radiation to make a statement on this. Check out the Geiger counter tests on simons utak or zenotography.
$45!?! You paid too much lol Mine was $2 at a Goodwill store
Ya you can find these for like nothing lol. That’s a good deal nice job.
yeah fuck off lol. they are like 100 buck where I live
Well most thrift shops don't have a slew of Pentax 50mm primes sooo...
I paid 50 cents!
Very cool, these vintage lenses are so good.
shame most today's photographers are only into sharpness and fast convenient snapping.
More for the rest of us! ;)
Great review.👌🏼
Thanks Prince! Honestly there aren't many draw backs with this lens, none that I see personally. Some people don't like shooting manual but I can't honestly say that is a problem for me. The image quality, build quality paired with my mirrorless camera is just magic....all for $50 ;) You can't go wrong. Just means you need a bit more time shooting wide open portraits with this lens which make shooting sports, kids or action difficult ;)
Mark Holtze I see your point. Thanks for clarifying. That can definitely be a drawback for some. I actually don't mind manual for portraits, landscape, astrophotography, and abstract. Unless, I'm shooting wildlife, kids, sports, and lightning. I wish the lens of today were built like the ones in the past. You have inspired me to try a vintage lens. I picked up a SMC Pentax-M 1:1.7 50mm Asahi and a Yashica 50mm 1:1.7. Not sure which one is the better of the two, or if they are even good at all, lol.
No problem, I mean modern lenses are GREAT! But they're expensive, prohibitively so for people who are wanting to explore photography but can't afford the gear. There is a difference shooting with slow zooms and fast primes, for me fast primes are where the fun is. Primes are just overall sharper because less moving parts/glass and being able to really isolate the subject and mess with the background bok is a lot of fun. Also shooting in low lighting conditions.
The lenses really are only limited to what you can do with them. For me the Super MC Takumar's are the BEST value for the buck. Built REALLY solid, great ergonomics. I Just picked up an 85mm 1.8 recently (the most expensive vintage lens I've purchased to date...but there is a premium on almost anything 85mm) and it's just mind blowingly good. You on instagram at all? Would love to follow along and see some of your results.
Mark Holtze I agree you're absolutely right. I wish I had known about that prior to buying my first lens. Which is a Sony SELP18105G E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS. I have my eye on a Sigma 16mm. I heard it is really sharp. Are you going to be making a video about this 85mm? Also, have you messed with any macro extension tubes? I have been thinking of buying some. My Instagram is princeharbinger I will be uploading more photos soon as I have 5000 in Lightroom that I have to edit. Most of what you will see is from an S8+. I just brought my A6300 about a month ago.
As I say never regret the purchase of a lens. I'll be making a video on the 85 for sure, i'm just finishing up my lens giveaway and a Premiere Tutorial now (my time this week has been limited) then the vintage sale which will motivate the 85mm review. So unless I get side tracked...iw should be the 3rd video in the next three :)
I've been taking it out to use it, I want to do a proper review on it so every day this week at work i'm shooting pictures going in and coming out. Going to use it for some B-Roll stuff on my next video as well. Just to get that well rounded feel.
I haven't messed with extension tubes, although i've heard they will bring the 1:2 pentax 100MM Macro to a 1:1 so that's cool. Just not something i'm in the market to buy right now. Have you?
Compared to the Canon FD 1.4 ?
Canon 1.4 is pretty good this one. I like the way this one feels better personally. Especially how the focus moves.
I've stubled across many Pentax Ashai lenses in various flea markets, but never something like this 50! Mostly 70-200s and once an interestin 100mm 2.8, but I'll keep my eyes open for a 50 like that ;)
OHH 70-200!!!! That vintage camera sale I was at back in OCT had SO SO SO many! 35 1.8, 85 1.4, 200mm F4...so many I wanted them ALL, but alas cash only and thankful otherwise I would have walked away spending more than I did...although for two Tak's $150 (macro 100mm F4 and 50 1.4) was a hell of a good deal IMHO.
Agree, quite a deal!
Marco Aries there are many of them on e-buy, but usually sold for $100 or more...
Ya lots on eBay. Ad in shipping and duties/tax for country and it gets pricy quick.
Aye watching from Jamaica
Very nice video. I lost my plastic lens cap. Does anyone know, where I can get a new (used) one? I know ebay, but the prices...........
They’re quite abundant. If you have an old photo store nearby they should have them. 49mm
Such a good lens. I have 6 including an 8 element. Make sure you keep it dry. Fungus alert.
Thanks, will do! ✊
If you used 25 ASA film you could zoom in 1000% when you got the pictures developed. I used to use 25 ASA film all the time in the 90s.
Hey quick question I have the same screw mount but when I attempted to screw the fotodiox adapter on to my A7rII the aperture blades lock up and it doesn't allow me to tighten it all the way tried two separate fotodiox adapters it's weird because I see yours goes on without a hitch I really want to get this to work to see how this reacts on my camera
I think you need to set the lens to auto or off auto. I know that problem but forget exactly how I fixed it. There is a button on the lens somewhere I think. Or a switch. I don’t know the lens you are using but my taks and others all work fine. The FD’s I had to fiddle with to get it to work. I’m pretty sure it’s the auto thing. But seeing it would help.
@@MarkHoltze it's actually the exact same one because on the back it has the two tabs one sticking up and one that appears to be bent down and then the actual pin I even paused the video when you turned so I know it can work I thought it was just the adapter
@mark holtze photos.app.goo.gl/6Jbe2FYQjDqJZE538
I found a Pentax Super multi coated 50mm 1.4 but it does not say Takumar? I have never seen a lens like this for pentax. Is says made in Japan but no Takumar label? Anybody seen one and what are your thoughts? I found it for a really good price...Thanks!!
Yours is a later version, Takumar brand was sort of adopted into Pentax. What lens mount is it?
@@MarkHoltze I thought I might have found a special edition or something..LOL the girl has no idea about the lens...
Looks mint though.
@@MarkHoltze Later or older version? Did not understand that...
@@ekphotography More recent version, yours is a newer version of the lens vs the one in this review. A lot of changes happened I think, it's debatable amongst the followers of this lens which one is better. I honestly couldn't care less about the nuances of what makes a lens better than the last, but I do care what you DO with that lens ;)
Sounds like you got a good deal mate, go out and make magic with it.
Jamaica 🇯🇲 Nice! That lens looks like a lot of fun! Also, yes to a giveaway. That would be a fun opportunity. Great vid and have fun on your holiday 👍 ☀️ 🏖
Thanks Buenos Diaz! Alright another YES for a giveaway! This should be fun! The lens is fantastic, you guys probably have loads of cool vintage photograph/film stuff where you are no?
Thanks so much for watching mate, we had a good time! Unfortunately back to reality now and we're celebrating days that are above the mark where water freezes ;). Looking forward to summer now, hot hot summer!
Mark Holtze Awesome, glad you had a super trip! Reality is always a good thing. There are tons of vintage and photography shops in my area of Southern California but a giveaway is always fun and exciting. Regardless, I’m close to purchasing a film camera 📷 I did t appreciate film as much when I was younger and want to learn more. Also being able to shoot photos/video on a vintage lens is exciting and a learning opportunity 👍
Funny enough you mention film...about 15 mins ago cleaning the basement I found my old light meter. still works, I've got some 2003 expired 400 kodak film and my dad's 35mm SLR I'm going to go have a little fun with.
I agree with you not appreciating it more when I was younger, I've always loved motion film and picked up a Super 8mm film camera (canon 814az) thing is BOSS! I just need some cool content to shoot cause it's an expensive process.
What camera are you looking at?
Mark Holtze Nice!!! Looking forward to any vids that come from these finds 👍
Would love to hear your thoughts as a possible video idea on shooting film. You should do a video on that at some point! :)
Is it radioactive, I read something about it.
It is, small amount of thorium in the glass element. Not enough to be any health risk.
I really wanted to buy it because it’s a great lens, but I didn’t feel confident with that.
So I bought a Pentax M 50 mm 1.7, that it’s a good lens but not Takumar.......
Anyway Mark , you make a great job with this channel.I didn’t know you, but now I follow you and watch your reviews with interest.
Well done man !!!
I tbink there is an 8 element takumar 50 1.4 that’s not radioactive. It’s more expensive, but they exist.
Thanks Nicola, lots more coming,. My latest has a giveaway, go check it out if you want :) thanks for hanging out by the way.
Too bad mine has some scratches on the front element, making it very hard to shoot at night. If anybody knows a fix, please let me know.
Scratches are for like I’m afraid. Not sure there is a way to fix them at this point.
Without wanting to sound to over the top Mark, I really love your style, especially in these kind of reviews/gear vids. Really glad I checked back in to watch this, but you totally make me want to vintage glass again!! Seriously tho dude. Absolutely love the vid, and more than a little jealous of Jamaica!!!
Awe thanks mate! I really appreciate the sentiment. It's an interesting creative exercise trying to find a style that works, that's not too close to what's been done by bigger youtubers. It's a funny process and indulge me here if you will.
When I'm shooting I never feel like I'm getting enough. Working as an editor for so many years ( i use to shoot a lot more, but once you get to this level of cutting it's pretty dedicated work). In the edit I would ask myself often "how did they not shoot this and that" you always find away around it, but you forget sitting in the edit how chaotic production is. Shooting things out of order, chasing daylight or location/actor union limitations etc etc. Everything takes longer in production and often you're shooting things out of sync so it's very easy to miss details and feel confident you have everything.
Even sitting in the edit knowing what I use and what I throw away, feeling I've gotten to a point where I could shoot super efficiently...the moment I get out there and start shooting I feel the exact same feeling of insecurity that I had in my early days of shooting...what people on set feel on the shows I work on (some of them).
I never feel truly comfortable with the stuff I work on until i've messed about with it in the edit. One thing i've learned is not to rush it. There's some serious creative value in letting the "edit speak to you" as I like to call it. Deadlines for work etc are always looming, but you find a way to buy this time. It's where new ideas spring up based on the material you have. It's a really interesting thing. You are probably aware of it yourself, but some of my best ideas or problem solving moments have come whilst outside of the edit. Walking/running/bathroom/shower/going to sleep etc.
You guys have a great style as well, the natural banter you have between the two of you is fantastic. It's so much easier to let your own creative work inspire you vs trying to copy someone else's style.
Anyway HUUUUUGE diatribe there, apologies if it's a bit incoherent. Finding a style and that process I think is a super interesting topic of discussion for me. Love hearing peoples creative processes, how ideas come, how they execute them, what they do when they don't workout.
I'll end it there lol....ifyou've made it this far!
Thanks again for the kind words!
Have you verified this one as "hot" personally? I've always been under the impression that the Super-Multi-Coated Takumars (as you have here) were not hot, while some of their Super Takumar predecessors were.
No Geiger meter test but given the excessive yellowing and the research I did so I came to the “conclusion” it was. “Conclusion in quotes lol.
Yeah, the yellowing is a strong clue there.
You can see it in the thumb pretty hard. I first noticed it when comparing shots to the pentacon 50 the same frame shot had a warmer grade to it. I would UV remove it but I kind of like it aesthetically.
I have an SMC Tak 50/1.4 without yellowing and a Super Takumar with. The Super does not get used on any film camera with colour film loaded, but I'll use it on DSLRs because I can adjust the white balance to compensate for the yellowing, and with B&W film because it almost acts as a cheap yellow filter and the colour cast is irrelevant. The SMC Tak has near-permanent residence on my Spotmatic F, because body and lens can talk to each other for open-aperture metering similar to the Pentax K mount and other modern systems. (My DSLRs are all Pentax, and with one early-model exception they have in-body stabilisation.)
My vintage 50's include a carl zeiss jena 50mm 1.8 a mamiya sekor 55mm 1.8 a yashinon. 50mm 1.8 but no takumars
It’s a nice collection. What’s your fav of the three?
Mark Holtze the jema its an m42 e mount so it meters open aperature on many of my L series prakticas (which dont "feel" as solid as sau a pentax nikon or mamiya sekor of the same period but 40+ years later stil work fine)
That's my home town...mobay
It’s a beautiful place! You’re a lucky man!
Any trouble going through airport security with these?
Hi Ben, had no trouble leaving Toronto and Jamaica so I can based on that experience say officially “no trouble”. :)
On the move, but will check in later dude. But I’m warning you, if this is going to make me buy even more glass I’ll be holding you responsible!!
I can't promise it won't, but don't worry...it's cheap! If anything stuff like this will increase the value of it so get in soon ;). You at the beach today? Or that place that costs 40 quid (eden? - i forget the name) Cornwall GO!
Three things about a lens go very well when put together.
50ish - 1.4ish - Old
Can’t agree more
Mine no longer can focus :( there's a dent, the aperture rotation no longer works. That's how I got it when someone I know gave it to me :p I wonder if I can this beautiful lens fixed up.
Ohhh that’s so annoying. Some of these lens gurus can do great work, might be cheaper to find another one though. You should check some online takumar groups and inquire within. Some guys can do it all.
@@MarkHoltze yeah that's what I thought too. I'm in Vancouver and hopefully I can find somewhere that could fix it but doesn't break my wallet. But I also found some online DIY tutorials, nothing to lose either :p
Ya might be kind of fun to tinker. Good luck mate
I have 55mm f1.8.so good
Just got one from by birthday
Wonderful! Let me know how you like it!
@@MarkHoltze amazing lens, but I have one question. For the moment I have the helios 44 and the Takumar 1.4, I'm thinking about buy the Canon 1.2. do you think that is a good improvement or the Takumar is good enought?
@@Alefeeeee Which Canon? The 55 1.2 or the 50 1.2? I mean the only reason to get the 1.2 is the fact it's a 1.2. I don't think it will REALLY do a lot for you in terms of being inspired, but who knows. You can never "have too many 50's" ;).
Are you sure the radiation isn't harmful? I was under the impression that it can be, and you ought to take care to avoid pointing the rear (or even front) elements at your face and store them in drawers far away from where you usually are.
Everything I have read about it from reliable sources tells me it is. Of course it’s not up to the individual to make the call themselves but based on what I know, I’m not overly concerned.
@@MarkHoltze I really want this lens too, so we may be in the same boat pretty soon. haha.
There might be an “8 element” version that isn’t radioactive. It’s suppose to be a superior lens as well.
I shot with the radioactive lens on an SPII for 35 yrs. No side effects, except hard of hearing now. 😆
i have one on a sony a7 and its the best
Curious to see how this one compares the non radioactive 8 element version.
are you from Canada ?
I am yes. Toronto
'before everybody gets out' that was the giveaway. anyways I shot some stuff today in chiang mai with the 50mm takumar and a Jupiter 85mm f2. love your vids God bless
Thanks mate! The Jupiter 85 is beautiful! Anywhere to see your work?
Geiger counters are cheap enough today. Dont think because the affordable ones "cant detect alpha"... yes, they are not sensible to alpha (kalium 40 of banana,...), but they can detect it partially as well, just only somewhat precise, they are sensible to beta and gamma which is also part of the decay products of thorium (so the geiger counter WILL detect it and probably even scream)
It doesnt matter anyways since its safe, but considering you dont have any yellowing on the back element, you either have a non radioactive or just slightly radioactive version (thoriated front element)
Remind me not to hang out with you when you are using that lens... lol
Lets just worry about hanging out before we worry about if the lens is present or not ;) Cross that bridge when it comes ;)
Maybe I'll pull mine out for a little photo fun.
I’m heavily bias but please do this 😆
It's nice glass,if you looking good vintage lenses you need trying zuiko old lenses)