CINE-SERVO 50-1000mm T5.0-8.9 Ultra-Telephoto Zoom Lens

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
  • Join Canon U.S.A.'s Larry Thorpe as he discusses the features and benefits of the Canon cine-servo 50-1000mm lens.
    For more eduction videos and articles, visit www.learn.usa.canon.com

Комментарии • 53

  • @akf2000
    @akf2000 9 лет назад +55

    no idea what he's talking about but i like listening to experts talk expertly

  • @Just_Ve
    @Just_Ve 7 лет назад +48

    Can I get good bokeh with this one? Is compatible with my T2i? Is good for street photography? The kit comes with this old man too? I mean, I will need him to explain to my family why I sold them to buy this lens.

    • @sejed6445
      @sejed6445 4 года назад +1

      🤣🤣😂😂😂

    • @thanhhieuert
      @thanhhieuert 4 года назад

      🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @bahaatamer1245
      @bahaatamer1245 Год назад

      It's ideal for street photography. Heck, it's better than their RF 85 1.2 Prime for Portraits!

    • @Scyth3934
      @Scyth3934 Год назад

      Lmao "does it come with the old man" i'm dying

  • @koolkutz7
    @koolkutz7 8 лет назад +18

    I saw one of these lenses being used on a BBC wildlife documentary recently and was curious to find out more. I think I will buy two!!

    • @AfterPrisonShow
      @AfterPrisonShow 8 лет назад +6

      you have 120,000 dollars? lol

    • @koolkutz7
      @koolkutz7 8 лет назад +2

      AfterPrisonShow I wish! The zoom range is incredible; one can only dream...

    • @AfterPrisonShow
      @AfterPrisonShow 8 лет назад

      HELL YEAH! I'm shooting in 1280x720 in 30 fps. It makes me drool to see camera's like this. Oh well, mabye one day.

    • @justinlabadie9409
      @justinlabadie9409 6 лет назад +2

      $70,000 x 2 = $140,000

    • @KhoPhi
      @KhoPhi 5 лет назад

      @@AfterPrisonShow Unless you plan shooting subjects i.e animals, people, objects at about 1km distances, you likely will never need this lens.

  • @DannyPops
    @DannyPops 7 лет назад +4

    Rather than just the normal stuff, this gets into the business/compromise/optical limits. Nice to hear an expert talk in precise terms.

  • @BillyInnes
    @BillyInnes 9 лет назад +33

    Asked my wife for Xmas she said no

  • @Davidevgen
    @Davidevgen 9 лет назад +23

    impressive lens but holy crap 70,000 dollars. wow...

    • @neirad537
      @neirad537 6 лет назад +1

      davidevgen a drop in the bucket for those TV networks

    • @AndyGraceMedia
      @AndyGraceMedia 2 года назад

      @@neirad537 Exactly! It's cheap for what it does. Canon's Digisuper 122x Box lens is about 4 times the price.

  • @markjob6354
    @markjob6354 9 лет назад +4

    This is the very height of modern lens technology by the looks of things, and once again, Canon is at the front of that. I don't think I've ever seen a lens of THAT focal length in such a small foot print ? I would like to see some serious test of what the lens shoots off of a C 500. The doubler gets it up to 1,500 mm ! Wow !

    • @markjob6354
      @markjob6354 9 лет назад +4

      I don't see the Canon C 500 as low end. Side by side tests show the C 500 image beating the Arri and the F 55

    • @markjob6354
      @markjob6354 9 лет назад +1

      Uhh, no, the Canon C 500 is not a sub 10K camera. It offers 2K RAW 12 bit recording. Full 4K 4096 x 2160 with specs very comparable to the Arri and F55. It's not a DSL like the Canon EOS 1D C. I wouldn't view it as a step down necessarily. Depends what you're shooting of course. A lot of feature film DOP's are choosing to shoot in 2k, but in higher color bit depth at 12 bit, etc.

    • @markjob6354
      @markjob6354 9 лет назад +2

      I never wrote every DOP is an idiot (??) What's your problem mate ? Yeah, it's true ! You can shoot 12 bit with a Canon C 500 ! Go here - www.usa.canon.com/cusa/professional/products/professional_cameras/cinema_eos_cameras/eos_c500#Specifications
      It is YOU who seems to think the C 500 is a sub par "Pro-sumer" sub 10 K camera, which it certainly is NOT ! Yes, I've seen several tests of the Arri Alexa along side the C 500 and the F 55 alongside the C 500. It is a draw with the Sony F 55 but a net win over the Arri Alexa.

    • @markjob6354
      @markjob6354 9 лет назад +1

      I wasn't aware the F 55 is 16 Bit in 4K. The tests I saw I couldn't see any real differences, and I'm a 30 year industry shooter. The glass also can make a huge difference, as i'm sure you well know. I found the Arri Alexa a little less in quality to the F 55 and the C 500. To equal the F 55, you have to use the Canon LUT on the C 500 and only certain lenses seem to get you there.

    • @markjob6354
      @markjob6354 9 лет назад +1

      I think with these newer Hybrid Camera Products, like a C 500, the "perception" of them as being a "Prosumer" type, sub 10 K camera (Like the XL H1 was), as somehow beneath consideration because of the "Snob" appeal by some DOP's. Again, like you, my expectations for the C 500 were low, but then I was greatly surprised.

  • @gur262
    @gur262 8 лет назад +1

    If it is really sharp, using it with a 4k mft camera would make for incredible reach. It should be just about on the border of diffraction.

  • @HalfInsaneOutdoorGuy
    @HalfInsaneOutdoorGuy 5 лет назад

    But...does it row for UC Davis?

  • @Kabz8
    @Kabz8 9 лет назад +2

    A feat in engineering, no doubt. Who dares compete with the technology in this lens?

  • @shibnathbanerjee560
    @shibnathbanerjee560 2 года назад

    Just thinking without canon making this beast we wouldn't get all those great wildlife documentaries, crudos to canon.
    And people will use this lens for a longtime..

  • @davidjones3635
    @davidjones3635 7 месяцев назад

    I can get the similar results as this lens with my modified Sky-Watcher f8 1000mm telescope.

  • @NoMoreForeignWars
    @NoMoreForeignWars 7 лет назад +1

    Can I take selfies with this?

    • @cujbaion1
      @cujbaion1 4 года назад

      Commanding trough a phone 😅

  • @hubzcaps
    @hubzcaps 9 лет назад +5

    man this guy good......thuglife

  • @dudewheresmychallenge1234
    @dudewheresmychallenge1234 8 лет назад +1

    I just brought this

  • @b_whitesell
    @b_whitesell 7 лет назад +3

    According to Google, that is $70,200

  • @alkevinzmedia
    @alkevinzmedia 8 лет назад +1

    How can a lens be 4K ? I thought all new EF lenses where capable of capturing 20mp? Even old Canon EF lenses from 1987-95 they were capable of 6+ megasensles on a film or digital camera .

    • @CanonUSA
      @CanonUSA  8 лет назад +4

      +Allan Zepeda Hi Allan. There's a video in our Digital Learning Center that explains it best. Check it out at bit.ly/254hwog Hope this helps!

    • @alkevinzmedia
      @alkevinzmedia 8 лет назад

      +CanonUSA Thank you.!

    • @HarrisAllen3
      @HarrisAllen3 8 лет назад +6

      +Allan Zepeda It's a marketing gimmick.

    • @nitramwin
      @nitramwin 6 лет назад

      Interesting question and it all goes back to the physics of light as it lasses through the optics!

  • @IamNoOne-001
    @IamNoOne-001 10 месяцев назад

    Incredible piece of equipment, too bad it costs the price of a house and weights near the limit of air companies allows it. It really is only for big cinematography productions.

  • @TheRealKeegan_
    @TheRealKeegan_ 8 лет назад

    this thing is 175k on Amazon

  • @vanessamayara9315
    @vanessamayara9315 4 года назад

    Comprei uma.

  • @StevenTorrey
    @StevenTorrey 7 лет назад

    If it costs $100, I'll take two.

  • @Edsonguerreiroedson-sr4gz
    @Edsonguerreiroedson-sr4gz 5 лет назад

    edsonguerreiro BAHIA

  • @cujbaion1
    @cujbaion1 4 года назад

    So with this I can see folks in church at 600ft away in 8K per person and if they have taken the wine on their lips. Not bad.

  • @daanstam6697
    @daanstam6697 9 лет назад +1

    well thats a lens :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)