I think your 2nd table is computed from (table1/overall_freq). You said we should divide table1 by smallest freq. But that does not make sense. Every row should be divided by its own overall freq. In that way, your full table2 is correct but the way was not. So in table2, last row is: .87=.2/.23, 1.74=.4/.23, .87=.2/.23 and so on. Please correct me if I am wrong.
@@decodingbio8114 can you plz guide me .....suppose i don't know what is the sequence i only have a log odd table (last one)and my teacher asked me find the sequence from matrix? then what rules should i follow? From your lecture i understand the value 1 will be preffered , zero and negative value willbe neglected and if in a colum have all negative and zero value but one value greater than 1 you should prefer it? Am i right? If not then guide me plz immediately
You said at 3rd position G would fit as it has the maximum positive frequency but when you are finally calculating in the very next slide, you are considering C at the 3rd position. Clear out the doubts, man!
I think your 2nd table is computed from (table1/overall_freq). You said we should divide table1 by smallest freq. But that does not make sense. Every row should be divided by its own overall freq.
In that way, your full table2 is correct but the way was not. So in table2, last row is: .87=.2/.23, 1.74=.4/.23, .87=.2/.23 and so on. Please correct me if I am wrong.
My apologies you are completely right.
Brother nothing to apology. You have explained great. Thanks a ton.
@@anowarulkabir4943 Thanks for appreciating. :)
@@decodingbio8114 can you plz guide me .....suppose i don't know what is the sequence i only have a log odd table (last one)and my teacher asked me find the sequence from matrix? then what rules should i follow?
From your lecture i understand
the value 1 will be preffered , zero and negative value willbe neglected and if in a colum have all negative and zero value but one value greater than 1 you should prefer it? Am i right? If not then guide me plz immediately
@@tahseenhashmi9442 yes you are getting right
Thank you so much sir for such a nice explanation.
Am I having a stroke? everything in English but i cant understand what your saying
It was demonstrated to Urdu speaking students so that’s why you couldn’t understand
Good one sir👍
Can I know the source from where you learnt this method? Thank you for the explanation
Essential bioinformatics
Book by Jin Xiong
@7.25 overall frquency kaise aai ??
how to calculate ??
See the pinned comment
at 8:04 the calculation is wrong. 0.6/0.2 = 3 not 2
See the first pinned comment
Can you plz explain again why selectivity reduces when sensitivity increases?
Awesome
great
Love from Odisha ❤️❤️
Video is good lakin logbase2 of 6.33 say 80 nahi aa raha jab k 2^6.33 say aa raha h to yani log odd nae lia?
Thanks sir
Yes I know I misinterpreted the calculations that's why please see the pinned comment for calculations
@@decodingbio8114 no problem,all your videos are great and to be honest ham khud bhi calculations Sahi nae kartay,pin Karna best h
@@backup3412 thanks for appreciation it means a lot
Thanks dude 👍
plx back ground frequency and for ground frequency ko alag alag samja day.
You said at 3rd position G would fit as it has the maximum positive frequency but when you are finally calculating in the very next slide, you are considering C at the 3rd position.
Clear out the doubts, man!
There is a mistake in explanation during lecture. Kindly read the pinned comment for clarification
Nice sir g
nicely explained
Shalini Kaushik thanks for appreciation
Jai Shree Ram 🚩
overall frequencies are wrong?
Kindly see the Pinned Comment for correct frequency calculations.
Why table 2 overall frequency is same as that of first table.......
Stan Yang please see the pinned comment as there is a mistake in video
There is a mistake ... 0.6/0.2 = 3
Subash Chandra Pakhrin thanks for pointing it out. Actually I’ve mentioned it in video that last two rows of tables are wrongly filled.