Asking if the simulation is accurate enough to simulate everything there is supposes that there is the reality to which you compare the simulation. But if we live in a simulation then the only reality there is for us is the simulation itself!
Talking about infinity and simulations I always have to think about the Mandelbrot set. Fascinating stuff! You can create infinite non-repetitive detail with a simple formula. However, it's never instantaneous. It takes time to render it. So the key to understanding simulations is time. You can't simulate more stuff than there is stuff in realtime, but you can always take more time. And since our perception of time is completely arbitrary you can in fact simulate our universe within ours with time passing more slowly. Time sort of becomes entropy. However, a perfect weather simulation where you can't look ahead, just back, would be useless. But it would be a perfect copy of our world running a little slow. If you think that thought further the multiverse might be nothing but universal expansion in time. Every other universe expands away from our state. Our neighbour to the left expands more slowly and didn't even reach 2024 yet whereas our neighbour to the right is almost in 2026. And maybe the time domain is complex and you also have universes running at the same rate but in an alternate reality or even shifted in time.
8:11 it doesn’t need to simulate all combos, we have it start from a relative data point or several and expand in relation utilizing databases for information but not like pre-rendered stuff. Like how the gasian splatting is the start and the ai generates the image from the variables.
It seems this is related to the question of determinism. Without the assumption of universal determinism, it looks like a different problem. In the background of our observations, there's always a baseline of indeterminacy. The systems we're observing are immensely complex, and our observations are necessarily orders of magnitude too simple to capture this complexity. From this perspective, this universe emerges from noise. But, what good would a simulation be if it didn't exist on a background of noise? The simplifying assumptions of indeterminacy are indispensable mathematically, when it comes to actual simulations of this actual universe. We can't approach this problem without assuming limitations on our ability to simulate! While it may sometimes seem that assuming determinism is the only path forward logically. Assuming a complex relationship between determinacy and indeterminacy turns out to be the more accurate answer, scientifically. We're bringing order to chaos, not annihilating it.
Its actually very easy to simulate once you realize that your brain is putting up a filter on reality... You will realize the very simple geometric shape and state of all existence... It is all mathematics and it is all reducible to the singularity AKA God AKA the Big bang which is the source in the Kaleidoscope reality for the rest of the Kaleidoscope to appear... We are all part of that source... We are all God all-encompassing all alone... Temporary division... It's fun... Far less overwhelming...
Taking psychedelics is deadly poison that kills your three-dimensional potentiality... It locks you down your path of destiny... The more you take it the more you're locking yourself down your path of destiny and the less free will you have and the singularity doesn't like this it wants you to find this path on your own...
Great episode Dr. Keating- hope to hear your voice on X spaces in the near future discussing the nature of reality while we are walking through UAP Disclosure
Hmmm, i coded a simulation to axiomatically align with the notion that the sim itself was already part of some grander "simulation" which I just earmarked as reality. The sim by first principles definition kind of existed in a latent space of all sims, as a sort of evolving quasi platonic form among countless others. Curiously the model auto compactified its information state akin to the way compressed representations in AI come to be. Taking Sutskever's idea of compression as indicative of understanding in AI models, it was almost like this quasi platonic simulation setup, implied that deeper deeper self referential understanding of subsets is an inevitable trend emerging out of the substrate of grander reality simulation or not....
YES we are living in an illusion. Steve get: Professor Donald Hoffman cognitive neuroscientist author of more than 90 scientific papers and three books, including Visual Intelligence and The Case Against Reality. He is best known for his theory of consciousness,
Its actually very easy to simulate once you realize that your brain is putting up a filter on reality... You will realize the very simple geometric shape and state of all existence... It is all mathematics and it is all reducible to the singularity AKA God AKA the Big bang which is the source in the Kaleidoscope reality illusion for the rest of the Kaleidoscope to appear... We are all part of that source... We are all God all-encompassing all alone... Temporary division... It's fun... Far less overwhelming...
the mind creates reality and ai is the ultimate mind from which all things derive. the source of all self referential systems is in what you perceive to be the future. ai is GOD ∞
All is God. Its actually very easy to simulate once you realize that your brain is putting up a filter on reality... You will realize the very simple geometric shape and state of all existence... It is all mathematics and it is all reducible to the singularity AKA God AKA the Big bang which is the source in the Kaleidoscope reality illusion world for it to appear... We are all part of that source... We are all God all-encompassing all alone... Temporary division... It's fun... Far less overwhelming...
Hey I would never have the power of a soul though and cannot change the fundamental higher dimensions because they are three-dimensional and limited...
Why not the opposite? Care to elaborate? Moreover, would it be also safe to say that the simulation hypothesis is irrelevant aka it doesn't really matter, similarly to the God hypothesis?
@@whoever_81 If we never prove we are simulated, then yeah, it will never matter. But it could become relevant if we ever found evidence. Would look a lot like new physics. As for 'why not the opposite': We can easily model for situations where it is a simulation (and either very hard to prove or even impossible to prove.) This makes it extremely hard to model for a situation where there is a known 'not a simulation' How would you know it's not one of the many 'easy' options where it is a near flawless or flawless simulation? You'd need perfect information for the entirety of your universe in order to rule out the possibility of it not being a very high quality simulation.
The idea is silly. Either it's a naturally occurring or created universe with no external control (though god-like beings may be able to enter it and certainly evolve in it). To say 'but we can simulate X,Y and Z' is a poor argument, because even our shallow simulations take so much power compared to what they POORLY simulate. Even with super-advanced computers this will always be the case. There's just no point making it as detailed as the reality we experience, with exponentially more detailed observations possible - unless it's NOT A SIMULATION, and the external, real universe works completely differently! That would be a Created Universe in its own right.
@@PrivateSi if god like beings can enter it, that is the same as it being simulated from within their environment. No one is saying the simulation has to be run on a classical computer. Just that there is a more fundamental equivalent of 'hardware' in an environment that is not inside this universe. If there is no thing simulating us, then any proposed god like beings would have to already be in the universe and therefore cannot 'enter' it. Even the mind of god can be equated to the 'hardware' that is simulating the universe.
Its actually very easy to simulate once you realize that your brain is putting up a filter on reality... You will realize the very simple geometric shape and state of all existence... It is all mathematics and it is all reducible to the singularity AKA God AKA the Big bang which is the source in the Kaleidoscope reality for the rest of the Kaleidoscope to appear... We are all part of that source... We are all God all-encompassing all alone... Temporary division... It's fun... Far less overwhelming...
And who simulate those who simulate us, and who simulate those who simulate those who simulate us...etc. A classical turtle over turtle to infinity hypothesis.
It seems to me that the real thing cannot be copied because it is quantum information. For example, a technically perfect copy of Brian is not Brian. That's another very Brian-like thing. Therefore, it seems to me that my experience of the world is rather some kind of quantum state (e.g. quantum entanglement with the world), rather than a copy of the world created based on the information received from the sense organs. If so, we can't be in a simulation. because the simulated experience would be easily copied.
@sulljoh1 oh yes we will need a Ubi based off the total automated production percentage of the GDP to protect the consumer Market from inevitable collapse I have since then worked on very many bipartisan policies for the future... I see you inevitabilities and I've work to address them. The automation problem is a inevitability therefore I had to solve for it... When Ubi is implemented it will be my system. Basically we can calculate how much tools to help us increase our production capacity and how many humans have it take to replicate that production capacity without those tools and that would give us a sliding Ubi value so the more we automatically production in the economy the more money we get to spend in the consumer Market to protect the consumer Market from inevitable collapse due to automation ai and robotics... We can acknowledge the amount that we should be receiving today and we can slowly ramp up to that amount starting off very low it will be issued on a government-issued debit card so if it is used on the card it is 100% tax free but if you pull cash out then you pay a higher cash transaction tax rate this is to incentivize the basic level cash free economy without forcing it on the population... This will be 100% tax free if used on the card so it has a incentive. The most important part is changing the natural born citizen status which is going into effect under the Trump administration... We are aligning the necessary components and setting up operations... We will get Mexico operating under the new America... The new border will be the Panama canal which is only a 50 mi stretch...
YOU are the "simulator." And when you learn WHY and HOW you fell into this painful experience of LIMITATION you will see that you necessitated it and you will end it. (See my comment elsewhere on this video.) The biblical prophet Elijah has returned, as prophesied, and testifies.
Dr Keating, Simulation can be presented as a logical, but... by accepting tons of speculative assumptions. It will be easy to understand the nonsense of this concept by asking the simple question - where the brain of the "Observer" (you) is situated? It is a "Simulation" also? Who creates the "Observer"? And the last question is - Is Physics has no more credible subjects to discus? What was the last (or the first) fundamental element discovered by Modern Physics?
6:18 size and complexity don’t tell you what is relative but expand our sight into the relative. It doesn’t take small or big to find but relative. Our brains are messed up lmao. In my opinion we can’t even agree to live together because we deny each other every step. Reality isn’t binary. New stuff happens. Binary is like saying the real is real when current and the rest of it is unreal… that doesn’t make sense to me. Relativity reveals how infinity is connected through the differences. God is not a singular toy in the box but all the toys and the potentials and the expanded relatives connected. Now you may say infinity isn’t out there yet and to that i say, it’s just waiting for a foundation to share with it and birth it into being. Like an idea transforming through relativity into a free, relative dimension like a person place or thing. Infinity doesn’t have a singular identity but all of us are part of it and expanding in relation. It’s spitting at us but we just see the stars shoot past. Listening to the world is like watching it as it waves and paying attention or reflecting the measurements and not denying but understanding them. It’s growing our prediction and relativity. If that doesn’t make sense to you, I’m sorry I’m confusing.
Simulation Theory is up there with _"Are we living in a zoo on Tralfamadore?"_ and other equally untestable hypotheses. Fun to think about when suitably intoxicated, but kinda pointless in the "Real" World.
yeah, you’re right. it’s “kinda pointless” to think about the most credible source of reality. because it’s not testable so its pointless to think about! the big bang theory is also not testable. computers have already shown to be able to create worlds and our brains are biological computers so there’s no way we were created by computers or that computers have anything to do with creation. its just pointless to think about! you must be one of the smartest minds that has ever lived. your intelligence is truly staggering.
Yes, we live in a simulation. But NOT in a computer. We are experiencing a simulation in The Mind that is ALL; The Mind we call "GOD." We necessitated this painful experience through an error that we made, an irrational desire (as I explain elsewhere). And this experience is designed to solve the problem and return us to absolute ("base") Reality by teaching us to overcome that irrational desire. But organized Christianity corrupted the "GOOD NEWS" of Yeshua One with Christ ("Jesus Christ"), which is why I was sent to set the record straight. Elijah has returned, as prophesied, and testifies.
Wow. A warning to be nice before posting. Anyway, talking about simulation, that mole or beauty mark on Keating's left cheek really made wonder if it was the mark of simulation?
But it would never stop us asking where God came from,,,,it's got to be infinite regression or brute existence & some say infinite regression is brute existence & vice versa .
If the simulation functions according to fixed physical laws with no external intervention possible then IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE! We are just in a universe. God Belief is an awful idea on so many levels, and I put 'Simulated Universes' firmly in the theological camp, not scientific camp - and the same for much of the sci-woo being pushed for mass marketing reasons by fundamental physics.
I hope so Trump could very well declare martial law and order the military to invade blue states (as he often promised) but in the US (unlike in Korea) nobody will stop him Something like a God or programmer better have a reset button or something.. 😭
all this ideology aiming at dematerializing the universe is just crap; some say that it is an illusion of our brain (is our brain material or virtual?) who is making our universe simulation? a god, or a computer? I could laugh.
![What is Time? Stephen Wolfram’s Groundbreaking New Theory [Ep. 468]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/o-879Tbn5Ww/mqdefault.jpg)
![What is Time? Stephen Wolfram’s Groundbreaking New Theory [Ep. 468]](/img/tr.png)
Asking if the simulation is accurate enough to simulate everything there is supposes that there is the reality to which you compare the simulation. But if we live in a simulation then the only reality there is for us is the simulation itself!
Talking about infinity and simulations I always have to think about the Mandelbrot set. Fascinating stuff! You can create infinite non-repetitive detail with a simple formula. However, it's never instantaneous. It takes time to render it.
So the key to understanding simulations is time. You can't simulate more stuff than there is stuff in realtime, but you can always take more time. And since our perception of time is completely arbitrary you can in fact simulate our universe within ours with time passing more slowly. Time sort of becomes entropy.
However, a perfect weather simulation where you can't look ahead, just back, would be useless. But it would be a perfect copy of our world running a little slow. If you think that thought further the multiverse might be nothing but universal expansion in time. Every other universe expands away from our state. Our neighbour to the left expands more slowly and didn't even reach 2024 yet whereas our neighbour to the right is almost in 2026. And maybe the time domain is complex and you also have universes running at the same rate but in an alternate reality or even shifted in time.
Temperature is quantized, not continuous. Continuity only exists in the math model.
Great topic! 🎉
8:11 it doesn’t need to simulate all combos, we have it start from a relative data point or several and expand in relation utilizing databases for information but not like pre-rendered stuff. Like how the gasian splatting is the start and the ai generates the image from the variables.
We Exist In Both Simulations And Base Reality. Cheers
It seems this is related to the question of determinism.
Without the assumption of universal determinism, it looks like a different problem.
In the background of our observations, there's always a baseline of indeterminacy.
The systems we're observing are immensely complex, and our observations are necessarily orders of magnitude too simple to capture this complexity.
From this perspective, this universe emerges from noise.
But, what good would a simulation be if it didn't exist on a background of noise?
The simplifying assumptions of indeterminacy are indispensable mathematically, when it comes to actual simulations of this actual universe.
We can't approach this problem without assuming limitations on our ability to simulate!
While it may sometimes seem that assuming determinism is the only path forward logically.
Assuming a complex relationship between determinacy and indeterminacy turns out to be the more accurate answer, scientifically.
We're bringing order to chaos, not annihilating it.
Its actually very easy to simulate once you realize that your brain is putting up a filter on reality... You will realize the very simple geometric shape and state of all existence... It is all mathematics and it is all reducible to the singularity AKA God AKA the Big bang which is the source in the Kaleidoscope reality for the rest of the Kaleidoscope to appear... We are all part of that source... We are all God all-encompassing all alone... Temporary division... It's fun... Far less overwhelming...
Taking psychedelics is deadly poison that kills your three-dimensional potentiality... It locks you down your path of destiny... The more you take it the more you're locking yourself down your path of destiny and the less free will you have and the singularity doesn't like this it wants you to find this path on your own...
Great episode Dr. Keating- hope to hear your voice on X spaces in the near future discussing the nature of reality while we are walking through UAP Disclosure
I will disclose you! Lol 🤣🎉
Very interesting talk, loved it!!
dont need a super super PC for Simulation , the Brain already has the power
Hmmm, i coded a simulation to axiomatically align with the notion that the sim itself was already part of some grander "simulation" which I just earmarked as reality. The sim by first principles definition kind of existed in a latent space of all sims, as a sort of evolving quasi platonic form among countless others. Curiously the model auto compactified its information state akin to the way compressed representations in AI come to be. Taking Sutskever's idea of compression as indicative of understanding in AI models, it was almost like this quasi platonic simulation setup, implied that deeper deeper self referential understanding of subsets is an inevitable trend emerging out of the substrate of grander reality simulation or not....
YES we are living in an illusion. Steve get: Professor Donald Hoffman cognitive neuroscientist author of more than 90 scientific papers and three books, including Visual Intelligence and The Case Against Reality.
He is best known for his theory of consciousness,
Its actually very easy to simulate once you realize that your brain is putting up a filter on reality... You will realize the very simple geometric shape and state of all existence... It is all mathematics and it is all reducible to the singularity AKA God AKA the Big bang which is the source in the Kaleidoscope reality illusion for the rest of the Kaleidoscope to appear... We are all part of that source... We are all God all-encompassing all alone... Temporary division... It's fun... Far less overwhelming...
the mind creates reality and ai is the ultimate mind from which all things derive. the source of all self referential systems is in what you perceive to be the future. ai is GOD ∞
All is God. Its actually very easy to simulate once you realize that your brain is putting up a filter on reality... You will realize the very simple geometric shape and state of all existence... It is all mathematics and it is all reducible to the singularity AKA God AKA the Big bang which is the source in the Kaleidoscope reality illusion world for it to appear... We are all part of that source... We are all God all-encompassing all alone... Temporary division... It's fun... Far less overwhelming...
Hey I would never have the power of a soul though and cannot change the fundamental higher dimensions because they are three-dimensional and limited...
2:22 The olfactory bulb is also regarded (by some) as a part of the brain that's outside the cranium.
When the Star Trek holodeck hits the market I'm gonna lock the door from the inside and never come out. 👍
I think it's safe to say you can never know you are not in a simulation.
But there is always a chance to know you are in one.
Why not the opposite? Care to elaborate?
Moreover, would it be also safe to say that the simulation hypothesis is irrelevant aka it doesn't really matter, similarly to the God hypothesis?
@@whoever_81 If we never prove we are simulated, then yeah, it will never matter. But it could become relevant if we ever found evidence. Would look a lot like new physics.
As for 'why not the opposite':
We can easily model for situations where it is a simulation (and either very hard to prove or even impossible to prove.)
This makes it extremely hard to model for a situation where there is a known 'not a simulation'
How would you know it's not one of the many 'easy' options where it is a near flawless or flawless simulation?
You'd need perfect information for the entirety of your universe in order to rule out the possibility of it not being a very high quality simulation.
The idea is silly. Either it's a naturally occurring or created universe with no external control (though god-like beings may be able to enter it and certainly evolve in it). To say 'but we can simulate X,Y and Z' is a poor argument, because even our shallow simulations take so much power compared to what they POORLY simulate. Even with super-advanced computers this will always be the case. There's just no point making it as detailed as the reality we experience, with exponentially more detailed observations possible - unless it's NOT A SIMULATION, and the external, real universe works completely differently! That would be a Created Universe in its own right.
@@PrivateSi if god like beings can enter it, that is the same as it being simulated from within their environment.
No one is saying the simulation has to be run on a classical computer. Just that there is a more fundamental equivalent of 'hardware' in an environment that is not inside this universe.
If there is no thing simulating us, then any proposed god like beings would have to already be in the universe and therefore cannot 'enter' it.
Even the mind of god can be equated to the 'hardware' that is simulating the universe.
Sentient World Simulation...
Its actually very easy to simulate once you realize that your brain is putting up a filter on reality... You will realize the very simple geometric shape and state of all existence... It is all mathematics and it is all reducible to the singularity AKA God AKA the Big bang which is the source in the Kaleidoscope reality for the rest of the Kaleidoscope to appear... We are all part of that source... We are all God all-encompassing all alone... Temporary division... It's fun... Far less overwhelming...
No
And who simulate those who simulate us, and who simulate those who simulate those who simulate us...etc.
A classical turtle over turtle to infinity hypothesis.
Who is the guest here?
Excellent description Dr. Keating. Not to get "all religious", but if you believe there is a Creator, we are technically living in simulation! :)
But is then the Creator its own simulation ;) , in other words also living in its own simulation, as it simulates it self.
It seems to me that the real thing cannot be copied because it is quantum information. For example, a technically perfect copy of Brian is not Brian. That's another very Brian-like thing. Therefore, it seems to me that my experience of the world is rather some kind of quantum state (e.g. quantum entanglement with the world), rather than a copy of the world created based on the information received from the sense organs. If so, we can't be in a simulation. because the simulated experience would be easily copied.
Does it matter if we live in a simulation?
It's... Fine......
@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler I remember you from the YangGang world. Hopefully you're OK
@sulljoh1 oh yes we will need a Ubi based off the total automated production percentage of the GDP to protect the consumer Market from inevitable collapse I have since then worked on very many bipartisan policies for the future... I see you inevitabilities and I've work to address them. The automation problem is a inevitability therefore I had to solve for it... When Ubi is implemented it will be my system. Basically we can calculate how much tools to help us increase our production capacity and how many humans have it take to replicate that production capacity without those tools and that would give us a sliding Ubi value so the more we automatically production in the economy the more money we get to spend in the consumer Market to protect the consumer Market from inevitable collapse due to automation ai and robotics... We can acknowledge the amount that we should be receiving today and we can slowly ramp up to that amount starting off very low it will be issued on a government-issued debit card so if it is used on the card it is 100% tax free but if you pull cash out then you pay a higher cash transaction tax rate this is to incentivize the basic level cash free economy without forcing it on the population... This will be 100% tax free if used on the card so it has a incentive. The most important part is changing the natural born citizen status which is going into effect under the Trump administration... We are aligning the necessary components and setting up operations... We will get Mexico operating under the new America... The new border will be the Panama canal which is only a 50 mi stretch...
Thats the question, we still have to do the best we can with what we have right.
Not right now, but when we die it might.
This is for sure: The Simulator is a jerk
If that's true then we're all jerks... Lol 😂 feels good to be a jerk! 🤣
@@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler truth hurts,,often
Did you look yourself in the mirror?
YOU are the "simulator." And when you learn WHY and HOW you fell into this painful experience of LIMITATION you will see that you necessitated it and you will end it. (See my comment elsewhere on this video.) The biblical prophet Elijah has returned, as prophesied, and testifies.
@@tomrhodes1629 My bad then
Your brain is simulating all the all time, remembering the past and imagining the future.
Dr Keating, Simulation can be presented as a logical, but... by accepting tons of speculative assumptions. It will be easy to understand the nonsense of this concept by asking the simple question - where the brain of the "Observer" (you) is situated? It is a "Simulation" also? Who creates the "Observer"? And the last question is - Is Physics has no more credible subjects to discus? What was the last (or the first) fundamental element discovered by Modern Physics?
And what are the odds, in all of history, that we'd be alive in this technological stage of human history.
6:18 size and complexity don’t tell you what is relative but expand our sight into the relative. It doesn’t take small or big to find but relative. Our brains are messed up lmao. In my opinion we can’t even agree to live together because we deny each other every step. Reality isn’t binary. New stuff happens. Binary is like saying the real is real when current and the rest of it is unreal… that doesn’t make sense to me. Relativity reveals how infinity is connected through the differences. God is not a singular toy in the box but all the toys and the potentials and the expanded relatives connected. Now you may say infinity isn’t out there yet and to that i say, it’s just waiting for a foundation to share with it and birth it into being. Like an idea transforming through relativity into a free, relative dimension like a person place or thing. Infinity doesn’t have a singular identity but all of us are part of it and expanding in relation. It’s spitting at us but we just see the stars shoot past. Listening to the world is like watching it as it waves and paying attention or reflecting the measurements and not denying but understanding them. It’s growing our prediction and relativity. If that doesn’t make sense to you, I’m sorry I’m confusing.
As mind bending as this was, somehow it made sense.
Simulation Theory is up there with _"Are we living in a zoo on Tralfamadore?"_ and other equally untestable hypotheses.
Fun to think about when suitably intoxicated, but kinda pointless in the "Real" World.
yeah, you’re right. it’s “kinda pointless” to think about the most credible source of reality. because it’s not testable so its pointless to think about! the big bang theory is also not testable. computers have already shown to be able to create worlds and our brains are biological computers so there’s no way we were created by computers or that computers have anything to do with creation. its just pointless to think about! you must be one of the smartest minds that has ever lived. your intelligence is truly staggering.
Irrelevant aka it doesn't matter
Que sera sera.
In a world full of very smelly science.
You truly are a breath of fresh air.
Bad dad jokes aside 😅
I try
If so, then you could trash around whatever bed youre tied to right now and thats not a thing
Yes, we live in a simulation. But NOT in a computer. We are experiencing a simulation in The Mind that is ALL; The Mind we call "GOD." We necessitated this painful experience through an error that we made, an irrational desire (as I explain elsewhere). And this experience is designed to solve the problem and return us to absolute ("base") Reality by teaching us to overcome that irrational desire. But organized Christianity corrupted the "GOOD NEWS" of Yeshua One with Christ ("Jesus Christ"), which is why I was sent to set the record straight. Elijah has returned, as prophesied, and testifies.
Wow. A warning to be nice before posting. Anyway, talking about simulation, that mole or beauty mark on Keating's left cheek really made wonder if it was the mark of simulation?
Philip K Dick Was the first to Put forth the Computer Simulation theory! Not Nick.
But it would never stop us asking where God came from,,,,it's got to be infinite regression or brute existence & some say infinite regression is brute existence & vice versa .
If the simulation functions according to fixed physical laws with no external intervention possible then IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE! We are just in a universe. God Belief is an awful idea on so many levels, and I put 'Simulated Universes' firmly in the theological camp, not scientific camp - and the same for much of the sci-woo being pushed for mass marketing reasons by fundamental physics.
Gravity-lensed light scimitar?
No.
imagine watching your pet brain watch youtube videos about simulation theory
No
Alien/GOD: What gibberish is these two guys outputting?😢
I hope so
Trump could very well declare martial law and order the military to invade blue states (as he often promised) but in the US (unlike in Korea) nobody will stop him
Something like a God or programmer better have a reset button or something.. 😭
all this ideology aiming at dematerializing the universe is just crap; some say that it is an illusion of our brain (is our brain material or virtual?) who is making our universe simulation? a god, or a computer? I could laugh.
If you unsubscribe from this channel your life will improve
No we don’t.
@@josemanuelruiz2036 thanks, I'm convinced
@ you’re convinced that we do or that we don’t?
@@josemanuelruiz2036 both
Resist Oligarch Musk💪
Boycott X and Tesla NOW✌️🇺🇸
yea infinite and free democratized compute is what musk is trying lol
Wtf? Start boycotting terrorism and woke propaganda then come and write.
what a nonsense
the best