I honestly agree with all of them. Still I want to see Affan and Cerys Fearless buffed, since they are supposed to be the counterparts of KoB, WQ and Radovid Judgement, but they are so weak in comparison
Only one I'd disagree with is Kob, he is too integral for too many Sy decks and I think nerfing him would ironically make for less variety on the lower/mid cost cards because people would include him regardless
The problem with Sove is Patricidal Fury leader, because with that leader it becomes uncounterable. Sove on its own is an interesting card. If you want to have more diversity in SY, maybe consider buffing other SY cards and not nerfing a faction defining card (KOB).
While that's true about Sove and Patricidal Fury, there isn't really anything that be done about it other than nerfing the Patricidal Fury leader then. Perhaps that would be an alternative approach. As far as KOB and SY, the problem with that is the other cards would have to take so many balance vote buffs to be competitive that I don't see it ever realistically happening. On the other hand, nerfing KOB makes all of the other cards more competitive with him.
So I don't disagree with either of them, but I was amused that your first buff you said six was too easy to remove, and your first nerf you said six was too hard to remove.
Kinda wish Boostgaard and especially classic toussaint would just be left alone, it’s a decently strong deck but it’s arguably the least oppressive NG deck and it’s a ton of fun to play. If you really want to nerf the archetype I would personally target the GN version of the deck by nerfing MOP.
The thing with King of Beggars is he really dominates all of the SY decks at the moment. I'd prefer to buff all of the alternative cards to have options in SY, but nerfing him is a far more efficient way of making other options competitive He is an incredibly strong card too.
@@ericjade Fair enough. We're all biased towards something. I remember when double Waters of Brokilon with the old Francesca was a thing and being annoyed they nerfed it, although to be fair they did kill the entire archetype for 2 years trying to address it.
I honestly agree with all of them. Still I want to see Affan and Cerys Fearless buffed, since they are supposed to be the counterparts of KoB, WQ and Radovid Judgement, but they are so weak in comparison
Highland Warlord needs nerfing 100%. Warriors is constantly in the meta for the past 3 years now because of that card
Probably true
highly agree! warriors is not fun to play against. personally i face it way too often
Only one I'd disagree with is Kob, he is too integral for too many Sy decks and I think nerfing him would ironically make for less variety on the lower/mid cost cards because people would include him regardless
I can see that argument. For me the fact that he's so integral to the faction as a whole is an issue though.
The problem with Sove is Patricidal Fury leader, because with that leader it becomes uncounterable. Sove on its own is an interesting card.
If you want to have more diversity in SY, maybe consider buffing other SY cards and not nerfing a faction defining card (KOB).
While that's true about Sove and Patricidal Fury, there isn't really anything that be done about it other than nerfing the Patricidal Fury leader then. Perhaps that would be an alternative approach.
As far as KOB and SY, the problem with that is the other cards would have to take so many balance vote buffs to be competitive that I don't see it ever realistically happening. On the other hand, nerfing KOB makes all of the other cards more competitive with him.
I voted for nerfing Tatterwing with +1 provisions. It's everywhere.
Hello! Love the videos keep it up. Also if you feel like it i’ve been wanting to make a NR Pincer deck and would love to see your take on it.
I did a Pincer Adda Knight deck recently so I probably won't for a little while
I really wanted to see elven deadeye buff cause they are the weakest archetype in ST faction
So I don't disagree with either of them, but I was amused that your first buff you said six was too easy to remove, and your first nerf you said six was too hard to remove.
I meant that Radovid is hard to remove considering it gets half of its effect on deploy unlike almost all the other order cards
@@platinumpatrol2964 oh I totally understood and don't disagree. It was just, in a vacuum, amusing to me.
@@rydiafan1 To be honest it amused me too when I was editing the video and was why I felt I should add some text to clarify
Kinda wish Boostgaard and especially classic toussaint would just be left alone, it’s a decently strong deck but it’s arguably the least oppressive NG deck and it’s a ton of fun to play.
If you really want to nerf the archetype I would personally target the GN version of the deck by nerfing MOP.
I like those NG decks too, but False Ciri appeared in pretty much every NG deck I played this month regardless of the leader.
Leave King of Beggars alone, Bro....🙂
The thing with King of Beggars is he really dominates all of the SY decks at the moment. I'd prefer to buff all of the alternative cards to have options in SY, but nerfing him is a far more efficient way of making other options competitive He is an incredibly strong card too.
@@platinumpatrol2964 I respect your opinion. But, I'm biased on this issue. I really hope that change doesn't happen.
@@ericjade Fair enough. We're all biased towards something. I remember when double Waters of Brokilon with the old Francesca was a thing and being annoyed they nerfed it, although to be fair they did kill the entire archetype for 2 years trying to address it.
Nerfing SK just doesn't make any sense to me.
Lol
Why do you think SK should be left alone? Do you think it's the weakest faction at the moment?
Oh look, it's a Warrier & Sove enjoyer!
@@platinumpatrol2964 Yes i do think so. Extremely underpowered compared to the other factions.
@@dannyavery5578 We can't all be sissys