@@Jakiyyyyy you need to consider that RT/PT use some resources of CPU. So, for a cpu test is good to use RT/PT when available and to make cpu bottleneck need to lower resolution to 900p or 720p with all the other settings maxed out
That's the problem of CPU benchmarks. They don't always use realistic use case configurations and they only test part of the story with the CPU. 1080p with a 7950x3d are you joking? With a 4090 sure. People would be surprised how much the gap would shrink between some of these CPUs if they tested at 1440p with a 4070ti, which is a more realistic use case than 1080p and 4090.
I still don't understand why Intel doesn't also make a cpu with L3 100MB and extend the life of the Z690-790. If the 6-8P/6-8E 5.2Ghz / 4GHz / 100MB came, it would be a great cpu for gaming and not always dealing with high frequencies.
It's not that easy to just put in cache like that. AMD is able to do it only because they developed a seperate technology to add more cache, and even then they are a lot of drawbacks to doing so. Plus hardware unboxed did a test which showed that Intel CPUs are less sensitive to high cache compared to AMD ones.
until 14th gen intel make monolithic cpus , and a single cpu like 13900k,. and disable cores/igpu/cache depends upon other varity like (13600k,13700k,13700f,13500,...) ,. maybe i guess, after few gen we can expect gaming/AI related seperate cpus from intel side
Next intel cpu's will have 25% single core performance increase so you can expect at least this much increase in gaming. No HT, only P and ton of E cores.
Depends on the country, where i live the 7950X3D is about 80% more expensive than the 14700K and the 7800X3D is still 40% more, for delivering almost the same performance per watt, here the i7 is a way better bang for my buck
Dude what? Have you seen gamer nexus and tech power up and hardware unboxed? Sry but the 7950x3d beat the 7800x3d. The only reason they recxomend it over the 7950x3d in gaming is because of the price but the 7950x3d edges it out in 1080p 1440p and 4k. Yall seem to confuse this and go 7800x3d is the best! But that's not what was said it was the best for the price. The 7950x3d is the best cpu amd has ever made. It's better in productivity and just as good in gaming and edged it out overall.
@@Jowi_C No worry, this is a great CPU and I've never had any issue with mine for gaming and productivity. If you can, vou can also wait 3-4 months for the release of Arrow lake (Core 9 285K).
There are two requirements for the 7800X3D to be worth it in front of the 14700K: 1. Just gaming. 2. Very powerful video card only (RTX 4080 or better). With a weaker video card, the difference is zero between the two processors, but the 14700K has double the performance in multi-core and is ~20% faster in single core. Certainly, the computer equipped with 14700K will respond more quickly in all tasks received, from a simple mouse click to rendering.
Depends on the country, where i live the 7950X3D is about 80% more expensive than the 14700K and the 7800X3D is still 40% more, for delivering almost the same performance per watt, here the i7 is a way better bang for my buck
This is good for science to show performance difference and all but such builds were never meant for AAA games @1080p. You'll not find a difference @4K and hardly any @2K regardless which of these 2 processors is used
@@AphillyatedYT Keeps up? Lol, it's the latest generation yet it only performs at most 5% better than its predecessor. Also, Intel's Raptor Lake architecture has some issues, so both i7s are bad if they have around the same issues with i9s.
14700k does have 4 more E cores which may be worth it if the price difference is low enough. But if you wanna play the latest AAA games and you can afford it R9 or i9 all the way. Look at the cyberpunk part, 40% usage on a 16 core CPU are you kidding me? That's with running nothing in the background. I know that will be a vastly superior experience compared to the 7800x3d with half the cores. Oof.
@@adelgubaishi I literally included the 13700K because it's a good CPU aside from the oxidation issues, and you still called me an AMD bot? Something's not adding up Intel bot.
You need to test cyberpunk 2077 and alan wake 2 with maxedout settings and PT ON (use Ray Reconstruction, not Frame gen) with a very low resolution like 720p or 900p to make cpu bottleneck. Don't forget that RT/PT use a lot of resources even of cpu!!! You should test all games with RT support and enable it with a lower resolution
most people aren't going to play at min setting except for competitive games so this is more realistic also in the min settings game both CPUs get higher fps then monitors can even project so this whole RUN to the store and get a 7800x3d is kind of bullshit plus that CPU isn't stable
@@AphillyatedYT you forget we talking about a cpu test of 2 cpu and can give some information about who will be more future proof. In the future the next gen games will be more intensive for both cpu and gpu
It seems that you can't test anymore which CPU is better with this settings. Both CPUs are relaxed in many of the games and the 4090 is being the bottleneck. That's why many of the games have the same FPS or a negligible difference regardless the CPU being used.
I mean, the 14700K actually did a lot better than I expected, but again if you are gaming, then the 7950X3D is way faster in raw performance, while being more efficient.
Take a look at the low 0.1 and 1% - it seems the Intel is doing as good or better than the 7950x3d - am also surprised about it. And also that the real power consumption in gaming is not that much different to AMD either. Am kind of impressed by the 14700k. Of course in terms of price to performance the 7800x3d is anyway the way to go.
@@OmnianMIU We will have to see in 2 years the Ryzen 9000 and 10000, which I assume will be the ones that will reach AM5, I don't think they have more than 40% performance in gaming over the current generation of Intel, 14th gen should hold up very well until 2026/ 27.
@@RaulMazuchelli It's you who's being ignorant. 80 degree Celsius is okay for a CPU under load, go and educate yourself. It only takes you a 5 second Google search.
I generally prefer Intel for framerate non variation but geez that 40+ Watts difference in Starfield doesn't make the 14700k a good deal... Intel should really go for a 10 Pcores architecture and just forget the Ecore thing.
Dual CCD CPUs with 3D cache has the disadvantage that games spill onto the second CCD which has no 3D cache therefore holding back the performance of the CPU. This is why AMD should just apply 3D cache on both CCD for the 9900X3D and 9950X3D.
"Need to be tested". It should be tested in the most realistic use case for most users. That's the problem with CPU benchmarking. 1080p with a 4090 is a ridiculous and absurd use case that's only a reality for a very small percentage of people. People would be surprised by how much the gap shrinks when you use a less powerful GPU at a higher resolution. There are more things to consider when buying either of these CPUs than just the average framerate. They're close enough alright.
@@akira4338 ehm no... intel cpus has better HIS wich improve heat transfer rate to cooler system! HIS of AM5 processors is really bad bro. Look at the power absorb and temperature on both cpus
@@OmnianMIU 😀😀 u dont knoe nothing about cpus. Intel cpus is much harder to cool and much hotter then am5 amd cpus. Its because intel is power hungry and has shit box coolers)
@@akira4338 me know nothing? 🤣🤣🤣 ok newbe 🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣 you should do agree with me because is truth, but it's clearly you are a tech illiterate and probably you have a potato pc kid. GG
The 7950x3d is the best cpu that amd has ever made people go 7800x3d is the best. No its price makes it a better buy. It is not the better cpu the 7950x3d beat it in gaming but costs a gopd bkt more which is qhy they fave the 7800x3d the win because of its price. Stop saying the 7800x3d is the best when it isnt. Also the 14700k gets to close in gaminf to not actually rhink about getting it due to its power everywhere else. The 14700k is a monster cpu.
Core i7 14700K, that cpu is shit, you should give promotional revenge to a company that what they have done is steal money from customers with their cpu. I am one of them who has spent thousands of dollars buying Intel cpu. I had to go to amd to be able to play a game decently
i7 14700k and even my i5 13500 is already on doomed platform where x3d one is on new platform, hats off amd that they are making new cpus for am4 till now, definitely am5 will last more longer than expected despite x3d runs really hot
I've been playing in UHD since 2016. And I assume that very few people still play in the stone-age resolution of Full HD. That's why it doesn't make sense, because in high resolution it almost doesn't matter which processor is used and that's exactly why it would be interesting to see whether there is still a difference in UHD with these CPUs.
Because Ryzen fan boys are too broke to buy expensive monitors, they're stuck in 1080p. I bought a 360hz 1440p oled and even that didn't do it for me, I got me a second monitor 4k fast ips, and the oled 1440p went back in the box 😂 FUK 1080P 😅😂😢
@@laszlozsurka8991 you’re along the right lines but not entirely accurate, GPU has a greater weight at 4K but CPU still impacts the FPS, so would be nice to see what the difference is, but it would be less drastic I imagine
@@DanRandyB0T But at 1080p the CPU difference is more noticeable than at 4K. That's why CPUs are meant to be benched at 1080p with a top end GPU to eliminate all GPU bottlenecks.
@@RaulMazuchelli based on what you said you might as well run cinebench then. The bottom line is ppl buying cpu GPU want to see what the fps is in a real life scenario, running those specs in 4K can still cause a degree of cpu bottlenecking but it’s less obvious to the eye. As the overall cpu looks like it’s all good but one of the cores/threads can hit its limit and cause a very small degree of bottlenecking. Otherwise based on your theory you could put any gen i7 over last few years or amd and the FPS will be identical because the GPU has bottlenecked and not the CPU, when we both know that won’t be the case.
@@auritro3903 You know what why Amd cards got so much Fps on games because of Amd graphics driver . If you check Amd Graphics card and Nvidia card then you can see the difference. Amd driver are usually reducing high reflection and shadow and image quality than Nvidia cards that is why Amd card got so much Fps in games and Reason of lower price , you can check difference of shaders in Nvidia and Amd , Nvidia providing so much shaders than Amd and lower voltage and Good graphics driver , Ray tracing technology, DLSS everything but Amd not providing these are .yes I know Amd have FSR But we can can't compare with DLSS . Amd Cards evadually destroying than Nvida after few years that is why Nvidia cost little higher And intel , it's all round package not only for gaming , we can use both editing and gaming but Amd 3d Processor only for gaming that is a shame thing
@@circle679-m3i You know what why Amd cards got so much Fps on games because of Amd graphics driver . If you check Amd Graphics card and Nvidia card then you can see the difference. Amd driver are usually reducing high reflection and shadow and image quality than Nvidia cards that is why Amd card got so much Fps in games and Reason of lower price , you can check difference of shaders in Nvidia and Amd , Nvidia providing so much shaders than Amd and lower voltage and Good graphics driver , Ray tracing technology, DLSS everything but Amd not providing these are .yes I know Amd have FSR But we can can't compare with DLSS . Amd Cards evadually destroying than Nvida after few years that is why Nvidia cost little higher
@@lynnlynne5924 I see a better and stable FPS on intel frame. Don't know about you. I think you are an AMD fanboy... but ok. This is your opinion 🤷🏻♂️
@@lynnlynne5924 it's very depending on user scenario. AMD has better platform for now because future proof of socket for sure but not the best CPUs overall! Anyway is good to have competition because both are very good processors!!!
Games :
Ghost of Tsushima - 0:00
Microsoft Flight Simulator - 1:02 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesMFS20
CYBERPUNK 2077 - 1:53 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesCP2077
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 2:56 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesRDR2
CS 2 - 4:03
Hogwarts Legacy - 5:09 - gvo.deals/TG3HogwartsLegacy
Forza Horizon 5 - 6:18 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesForza5
The Witcher 3 - 7:22 - gvo.deals/TestingGamesWitcher
Starfield - 8:32
Horizon Forbidden West - 9:40
System:
Windows 11
Core i7-14700K - bit.ly/3QqUF5u
ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc
Ryzen 9 7950X3D - bit.ly/41wwPIV
MSI MPG X670E CARBON
G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3XlBGdU
CPU Cooler - MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360 - bit.ly/3mOVgiy
GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj
SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe
Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
Test i9 12900K and i7 14700K for me, brother
Thanks for including the cs2 new benchmark, very reasonable :)
clockspeed vs cache
Forza: I will take any
Game and new CPU-GPU : Released
Testers : Let's ride horse and check fps!
New games: released
Everyone: Let's just check the fps and then uninstall. 😊
I'd love to see this test include all the variables...such as 1440p/4k, DLSS, and RT On/Off. But that's just me.
@@ShenMerrick you right, I agree with you. Technologies are here and must be tested
DLSS is acceptable but 4K and RT are GPU bounded. 🤷🏻♀️
@@Jakiyyyyy Yes, but I think 1440 should be there. 1080 is the goal of consoles...something of yesteryear.
@@Jakiyyyyy you need to consider that RT/PT use some resources of CPU. So, for a cpu test is good to use RT/PT when available and to make cpu bottleneck need to lower resolution to 900p or 720p with all the other settings maxed out
That's the problem of CPU benchmarks. They don't always use realistic use case configurations and they only test part of the story with the CPU. 1080p with a 7950x3d are you joking? With a 4090 sure. People would be surprised how much the gap would shrink between some of these CPUs if they tested at 1440p with a 4070ti, which is a more realistic use case than 1080p and 4090.
It's a pity there was no Dragon's Dogma 2 in these tests
I still don't understand why Intel doesn't also make a cpu with L3 100MB and extend the life of the Z690-790.
If the 6-8P/6-8E 5.2Ghz / 4GHz / 100MB came, it would be a great cpu for gaming and not always dealing with high frequencies.
It's not that easy to just put in cache like that. AMD is able to do it only because they developed a seperate technology to add more cache, and even then they are a lot of drawbacks to doing so. Plus hardware unboxed did a test which showed that Intel CPUs are less sensitive to high cache compared to AMD ones.
until 14th gen intel make monolithic cpus , and a single cpu like 13900k,. and disable cores/igpu/cache depends upon other varity like (13600k,13700k,13700f,13500,...) ,. maybe i guess, after few gen we can expect gaming/AI related seperate cpus from intel side
To much power draw on intel.
Next intel cpu's will have 25% single core performance increase so you can expect at least this much increase in gaming. No HT, only P and ton of E cores.
They tried it and haven’t noticed big performance difference
7800x3d is better than both of these processors and is also cheaper
Yeah
Depends on the country, where i live the 7950X3D is about 80% more expensive than the 14700K and the 7800X3D is still 40% more, for delivering almost the same performance per watt, here the i7 is a way better bang for my buck
@@RaulMazuchelli agreed. i bought 14700KF since 7800x3d is more expensive. not to mentioned ridiculous price of good b650 motherboards
Dude what? Have you seen gamer nexus and tech power up and hardware unboxed? Sry but the 7950x3d beat the 7800x3d. The only reason they recxomend it over the 7950x3d in gaming is because of the price but the 7950x3d edges it out in 1080p 1440p and 4k. Yall seem to confuse this and go 7800x3d is the best! But that's not what was said it was the best for the price. The 7950x3d is the best cpu amd has ever made. It's better in productivity and just as good in gaming and edged it out overall.
@@itouchgr4sswhere u guys from? I bough a 7800 for 380 and an aorus b650 for 215
Can you test helldivers 2 somehow?
I vote for the 14700K, on par in games but better in real world application outside of gaming and is cheaper.
what about the stability issues with all 13 & 14 gen that all pc youtubers are highlighting nowadays?
@@adelgubaishi No problem whatsoever with mine. It's mostly the 13900K-14900K that have some instability issues.
@@jettsom Do you think the i7 14700k won't give me problems? I bought that one and will only use it to play at 60 frames in 2k.
@@Jowi_C No worry, this is a great CPU and I've never had any issue with mine for gaming and productivity. If you can, vou can also wait 3-4 months for the release of Arrow lake (Core 9 285K).
There are two requirements for the 7800X3D to be worth it in front of the 14700K:
1. Just gaming.
2. Very powerful video card only (RTX 4080 or better).
With a weaker video card, the difference is zero between the two processors, but the 14700K has double the performance in multi-core and is ~20% faster in single core. Certainly, the computer equipped with 14700K will respond more quickly in all tasks received, from a simple mouse click to rendering.
7800x3d wins in price to performance and temps ratio in games with almost every processor.
Depends on the country, where i live the 7950X3D is about 80% more expensive than the 14700K and the 7800X3D is still 40% more, for delivering almost the same performance per watt, here the i7 is a way better bang for my buck
AMD bot detected, opinion rejected✋👊
This is good for science to show performance difference and all but such builds were never meant for AAA games @1080p. You'll not find a difference @4K and hardly any @2K regardless which of these 2 processors is used
@@ZiZo34344 yep
...
4K+ makes the game more GPU bound (where a stronger GPU matters more)
and
It's unreal but that's just to serve the purpose of the test. Of course this is too overspent for 1080p. 5600 is enough. 🤷🏻♀️
@@Jakiyyyyy no 5600 isn't enough. You'll see a difference @2K and a smaller one @4K
Test i9 12900K and i7 14700K for me, brother
Why does no one mention the temp difference. I'd rather use extra watts if it meant I could run at least 10c cooler.
Nope, i7-13700K or R7 7800X3D
why? its noth of their newest so who cares your just mad that the 14700k keeps up lol
@@AphillyatedYT Keeps up? Lol, it's the latest generation yet it only performs at most 5% better than its predecessor. Also, Intel's Raptor Lake architecture has some issues, so both i7s are bad if they have around the same issues with i9s.
14700k does have 4 more E cores which may be worth it if the price difference is low enough. But if you wanna play the latest AAA games and you can afford it R9 or i9 all the way. Look at the cyberpunk part, 40% usage on a 16 core CPU are you kidding me? That's with running nothing in the background. I know that will be a vastly superior experience compared to the 7800x3d with half the cores. Oof.
@@shadowlemon69 AMD bot detected, opinion rejected✋👊
@@adelgubaishi I literally included the 13700K because it's a good CPU aside from the oxidation issues, and you still called me an AMD bot? Something's not adding up Intel bot.
You need to test cyberpunk 2077 and alan wake 2 with maxedout settings and PT ON (use Ray Reconstruction, not Frame gen) with a very low resolution like 720p or 900p to make cpu bottleneck. Don't forget that RT/PT use a lot of resources even of cpu!!! You should test all games with RT support and enable it with a lower resolution
most people aren't going to play at min setting except for competitive games so this is more realistic also in the min settings game both CPUs get higher fps then monitors can even project so this whole RUN to the store and get a 7800x3d is kind of bullshit plus that CPU isn't stable
but you are right im not saying your wrong but most people are going to play at high settings
@@AphillyatedYT you forget we talking about a cpu test of 2 cpu and can give some information about who will be more future proof. In the future the next gen games will be more intensive for both cpu and gpu
Competition always good
Yep
Competition always good but fanboying is not good. 🤣
💯💯💯💯come on ，Intel
It seems that you can't test anymore which CPU is better with this settings. Both CPUs are relaxed in many of the games and the 4090 is being the bottleneck. That's why many of the games have the same FPS or a negligible difference regardless the CPU being used.
I mean, the 14700K actually did a lot better than I expected, but again if you are gaming, then the 7950X3D is way faster in raw performance, while being more efficient.
yes, but is worth the +200 usd for 10fps?
@engulfinglightning6726 of course not, but AM5 has support for future CPUs while lga1700 is dead
Take a look at the low 0.1 and 1% - it seems the Intel is doing as good or better than the 7950x3d - am also surprised about it.
And also that the real power consumption in gaming is not that much different to AMD either.
Am kind of impressed by the 14700k.
Of course in terms of price to performance the 7800x3d is anyway the way to go.
@@OmnianMIU We will have to see in 2 years the Ryzen 9000 and 10000, which I assume will be the ones that will reach AM5, I don't think they have more than 40% performance in gaming over the current generation of Intel, 14th gen should hold up very well until 2026/ 27.
@@janx83 me too, for 400usd it goes very well, the i5 14600k too
I see better low FPS in 14700k. The intel's cpu seems more stable
Also in gaming it seems the power draw is also not much different. I actually might get one once it is cheaper available.
@janx83 yep, but this is not a surprise that in game the power draw of intel's cpus is lower 👍🏼
Ryzen 7950x3d runs way too hot.
below 80 is fine
@@KelvinKMS hell no
@@RaulMazuchelli Umm yes it is... anything under 80 is fine. Learn how CPUs work.
@@laszlozsurka8991 good luck being ignorant
@@RaulMazuchelli It's you who's being ignorant. 80 degree Celsius is okay for a CPU under load, go and educate yourself. It only takes you a 5 second Google search.
i dont remember clearly but yeah i think 7000 ryzens have better fps, though i somehow recall very impressed w 14100 and 14700
1 percent lows better on intel making a cleaner more smooth gaming experience
I'm really surprised about these results
I generally prefer Intel for framerate non variation but geez that 40+ Watts difference in Starfield doesn't make the 14700k a good deal...
Intel should really go for a 10 Pcores architecture and just forget the Ecore thing.
Yeah but the x3d is running around 15 degrees hotter. Pick your poison.
Dual CCD CPUs with 3D cache has the disadvantage that games spill onto the second CCD which has no 3D cache therefore holding back the performance of the CPU. This is why AMD should just apply 3D cache on both CCD for the 9900X3D and 9950X3D.
the problem is the price of it. I still think they should invest more in their 8-core CCDs with 3D Cache or develop a CDD with 10 cores or more.
@@laszlozsurka8991 I don't think AMD will put 3D V-cache on both CCD for next X3D processors. There is nothing leaked about that
@@OmnianMIU Yeah which is a bummer, because then it'll look like the 9950X3D and 9900X3D will be overshadowed by the 9800X3D.
@@laszlozsurka8991 yep same as current gen
С таким процессором и видеокартой на fulhd смешно сравнивать. Тут надо 2К или 4К мониторы для сравнения
You realize that CPUs need to be tested on CPU-intensive games, which are turn-based, city builders, and RTSs.
"Need to be tested". It should be tested in the most realistic use case for most users. That's the problem with CPU benchmarking. 1080p with a 4090 is a ridiculous and absurd use case that's only a reality for a very small percentage of people. People would be surprised by how much the gap shrinks when you use a less powerful GPU at a higher resolution. There are more things to consider when buying either of these CPUs than just the average framerate. They're close enough alright.
R9 will need very expensive water cooling.... 70°С!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
70°C is fine... CPUs are manufactured to run fine at high temps. Anything below 80°C is okay.
Intel is hotter than amd bro wdym 😄🫠
@@akira4338 ehm no... intel cpus has better HIS wich improve heat transfer rate to cooler system! HIS of AM5 processors is really bad bro. Look at the power absorb and temperature on both cpus
@@OmnianMIU 😀😀 u dont knoe nothing about cpus. Intel cpus is much harder to cool and much hotter then am5 amd cpus. Its because intel is power hungry and has shit box coolers)
@@akira4338 me know nothing? 🤣🤣🤣 ok newbe 🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣 you should do agree with me because is truth, but it's clearly you are a tech illiterate and probably you have a potato pc kid. GG
BUT 7950X3D is at least usd100 more!
The 7950x3d is the best cpu that amd has ever made people go 7800x3d is the best. No its price makes it a better buy. It is not the better cpu the 7950x3d beat it in gaming but costs a gopd bkt more which is qhy they fave the 7800x3d the win because of its price. Stop saying the 7800x3d is the best when it isnt. Also the 14700k gets to close in gaminf to not actually rhink about getting it due to its power everywhere else. The 14700k is a monster cpu.
Bad Single core performance of 7950X3D and lower %1 and % 0.1 Fps than 14700K.
Imagine running a 14700k with 6000mhz RAM...
me running 6000MT/S ram with my 14700K😱
9 vs 9
7 vs 7
5 vs 5
7 vs 9 🚫🙅
+- but 200 bucks are not on the road
Core i7 14700K, that cpu is shit, you should give promotional revenge to a company that what they have done is steal money from customers with their cpu. I am one of them who has spent thousands of dollars buying Intel cpu. I had to go to amd to be able to play a game decently
Mf does not know how to do a cpu benchmark
Most games need 8 cores,
Intel❤
AMD 🔥🔥
Amd fanboys lmao
*laughs in degraded 14th gen Intel CPU*
BUT but BUT but BUT but... AMD uses less POWAH!!! lol
i7 14700k and even my i5 13500 is already on doomed platform where x3d one is on new platform, hats off amd that they are making new cpus for am4 till now, definitely am5 will last more longer than expected
despite x3d runs really hot
Also amd is better ❤
Test it in UHD.
1080P in 2024 is so stupid.
Can you explain why it's stupid? 🤷🏻♀️
I've been playing in UHD since 2016. And I assume that very few people still play in the stone-age resolution of Full HD. That's why it doesn't make sense, because in high resolution it almost doesn't matter which processor is used and that's exactly why it would be interesting to see whether there is still a difference in UHD with these CPUs.
Because Ryzen fan boys are too broke to buy expensive monitors, they're stuck in 1080p. I bought a 360hz 1440p oled and even that didn't do it for me, I got me a second monitor 4k fast ips, and the oled 1440p went back in the box 😂 FUK 1080P 😅😂😢
@@yzuniga13sa so true
No ones realistically buying those CPUs and that GPU and playing in 1080. Should also run the test in 4K along side
4K is pointless in a CPU test since at 4K the GPU does the work.
@@DanRandyB0T so... u dont know how q CPU test works and thar testing in 4K u will be stressing the GPU and not The CPU? LMAO
@@laszlozsurka8991 you’re along the right lines but not entirely accurate, GPU has a greater weight at 4K but CPU still impacts the FPS, so would be nice to see what the difference is, but it would be less drastic I imagine
@@DanRandyB0T But at 1080p the CPU difference is more noticeable than at 4K. That's why CPUs are meant to be benched at 1080p with a top end GPU to eliminate all GPU bottlenecks.
@@RaulMazuchelli based on what you said you might as well run cinebench then. The bottom line is ppl buying cpu GPU want to see what the fps is in a real life scenario, running those specs in 4K can still cause a degree of cpu bottlenecking but it’s less obvious to the eye. As the overall cpu looks like it’s all good but one of the cores/threads can hit its limit and cause a very small degree of bottlenecking. Otherwise based on your theory you could put any gen i7 over last few years or amd and the FPS will be identical because the GPU has bottlenecked and not the CPU, when we both know that won’t be the case.
At least use 4080 to see difference
doesn't make sense, why create gpu bottleneck in cpu comparison
@@beneg.9904 bottle neck. I don't think it's gonna be so bad as u r saying
Ryzen 7950x3d 🤘💪
@@fungame8117 ehm 👎
ryzen is trash
Now do it in 4K
What!!! I see Hogwarts Legacy a 1080p resolution rtx 4090 AVG 74 fps, Is this a joke?
unfortunately no
CPU bottleneck...
Team Intel and Nvidia all day! Screw AMD’s trash. 😂
fanboy spotted
@@auritro3903 You know what why Amd cards got so much Fps on games because of Amd graphics driver . If you check Amd Graphics card and Nvidia card then you can see the difference. Amd driver are usually reducing high reflection and shadow and image quality than Nvidia cards that is why Amd card got so much Fps in games and Reason of lower price , you can check difference of shaders in Nvidia and Amd , Nvidia providing so much shaders than Amd and lower voltage and Good graphics driver , Ray tracing technology, DLSS everything but Amd not providing these are .yes I know Amd have FSR But we can can't compare with DLSS . Amd Cards evadually destroying than Nvida after few years that is why Nvidia cost little higher
And intel , it's all round package not only for gaming , we can use both editing and gaming but Amd 3d Processor only for gaming that is a shame thing
Keep cryng
Rx 7800 xt overclocked shits on 4070 super and have equal power to 4070 ti super
@@circle679-m3i You know what why Amd cards got so much Fps on games because of Amd graphics driver . If you check Amd Graphics card and Nvidia card then you can see the difference. Amd driver are usually reducing high reflection and shadow and image quality than Nvidia cards that is why Amd card got so much Fps in games and Reason of lower price , you can check difference of shaders in Nvidia and Amd , Nvidia providing so much shaders than Amd and lower voltage and Good graphics driver , Ray tracing technology, DLSS everything but Amd not providing these are .yes I know Amd have FSR But we can can't compare with DLSS . Amd Cards evadually destroying than Nvida after few years that is why Nvidia cost little higher
@@circle679-m3i Keep hating, salty broke guy. 🤡
first!
Last
All flamewars aside... Its truly outrageous you need ~$3500 to play hogwarts legacy @74 fps
conclusion:
If you play a non-optimized garbage game, then take AMD
or just want to save money for gaming performance -> 7800X3D
Ryzen 9 wins
@@lynnlynne5924 ehm no
@@OmnianMIU dude Ryzen 9 all better intel = garbage
@@lynnlynne5924 I see a better and stable FPS on intel frame. Don't know about you. I think you are an AMD fanboy... but ok. This is your opinion 🤷🏻♂️
@@OmnianMIU you are intel fan boy.. i using i9-10920X .. 2024 in best cpu is Ryzen serise its tru lol
@@lynnlynne5924 it's very depending on user scenario. AMD has better platform for now because future proof of socket for sure but not the best CPUs overall! Anyway is good to have competition because both are very good processors!!!
Look at CPU power and FPS.
It enough 😂
Can't fight minimum T7 7800X3D .
For gaming Intel LoL 😂
Vamos ryzennn !!!!!! Jajajajajajaja