ANSWER WRITING SKILL DEVELOPMENT CLASS | CRIMINAL LAW MANS PAPER | RJS MAINS 2024 | KDALC

HELLO EVERYONE ,
AS YOU ALL KNOW THAT RJS 2024 Pre. RESULT HAS BEEN RELEASED AND NOW THE STUDENTS ARE AIMING FOR RJS MAINS , WE ARE HERE WITH A CLASS ON ANSWER WRITING SKILL DEVELOPMENT CLASS . AS WE ALL KNOW THAT THIS PART OF PAPER IS VERY HARD TO DETERMINE AND ALSO THE PART WHERE MOST OF THE STUDENTS LACKS ACCURACY . TO ENSURE THAT OUR STUDENTS SHOULD GET ATTAIN MORE MARKS . OUR EXPERT FACULTY K D CHARAN SIR IS HERE TO TELL YOU HOW TO WRITE ANSWERS .
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND REGISTRATION :- 7426918387 , 8387993338
#RJS #KDCHARANSIR #KDALC #rajasthanjudicialserviceexam #judiciary #caselaws #RJSJUDGMENTS #rjs2024 #highcourt #rjsmains

[@PunnuCooks]

45:43 3 marks ke ques me ap 2 case laws ki 1 page ki reasoning likhenge? Unrealistic

[@pratikraj8855]

W.r.t. first question sir, The first wife (aggrieved person) has the right to file a complaint within India against the husband u/s 198(1) CrPC. The court mentioned u/s 182(2) CrPC would have the jurisdiction to try. Finally, S. 3 of IPC makes him liable to be prosecuted within India as he is a 'person liable by any Indian law to be tried....as if such act had been committed within India'.
If you don't want to apply S. 3 of IPC, then S. 2 IPC can also be applied bcs it also applies on non citizens committing an offence beyond India if the consequences are ensued in India (bcs the wife in India is getting affected). Refer S. 2 of IPC r/w S. 179, 182(2) & 198(1) of CrPC.

[@KDADVANCEDLAWCLASSESINSTITUTE]

You should read section 188 crpc and section 4 IPC first

[@pratikraj8855]

​@@KDADVANCEDLAWCLASSESINSTITUTEI've read these sections sir... That's why I'm saying that in this particular situation S. 4 IPC will not apply... reason being that this is an offence committed against a citizen of India while the victim was in India.... there's no question of Sec 4 being applied here. Sec. 3 IPC will apply here..as it applies where offence is committed beyond India but by a person liable by any Indian law. Would you take away the right of the first wife given u/s 198(1) crpc merely because the perpetrator is not a citizen anymore? She will still have her right. That makes the husband a 'person liable by Indian law'. This situation squarely falls within the four corners of Sec 3 IPC.

[@prasoonpandey7658]

​@@pratikraj8855your reasoning is absolutely true brother don't bother . You may also refer Sondur Gopal vs Sondur Rajini

[@pratikraj8855]

​@@prasoonpandey7658thank you for confirming bhai...

[@Voice-from-heart8272]

Nice

[@mohammadriyaz2408]

Combo separately purchase kr skte h sir?

[@KDADVANCEDLAWCLASSESINSTITUTE]

Yes

[@richasharma4844]

You are best sir apke jese koi nahi samjha sakta bohat acha padha rahe h sir ap

[@babulalchoudhary3192]

Hindu law tho hindu ke saat rahta hai

[@KDADVANCEDLAWCLASSESINSTITUTE]

Void marriage hogi , civil action le sakti he