We just had a student graduate and land a job in 3 weeks! Obviously we cannot guarantee a job but we’ve tailored the program specifically with that goal in mind.
- Utilize the underscore as a placeholder when declaring variables you do not intend to use to avoid syntax errors and clear confusion about the variable's role. 0:29 - Implement the 'else' statement with 'for' and 'while' loops to execute a block of code when the loop is not terminated by a 'break' statement, simplifying the need for flag variables. 3:00 - Explore the walrus operator (:=) in Python 3.8 for defining a value as part of a condition in loops, making code more readable and efficient. 6:22 - Apply argument and parameter unpacking using the asterisk (*) and double asterisk (**) operators for passing multiple arguments or keyword arguments from iterables or dictionaries to functions, enhancing code readability. 10:00 - Use the default dictionary from the collections module to automatically assign default values when accessing keys that do not exist, streamlining code that increments keys or processes missing keys. 13:20
I was amazed at how much uproar the walrus operator caused when it arrived in Python 3.8. Your list comprehension example with the f(x) assignment is a clear use case that isn't possible (at least without something really convoluted) without it.
A common problem in C languages is someone doing: while (x = my_func(y)) ... instead of: while (x == my_func(y)) ... Which have very different meanings. Python _avoided_ this problem by explicitly prohibiting assignment in conditional context. The issue is you end up with people forgetting to update the evaluation variable at the end of the loop. By introducing an explicit assignment syntax that's "safe" for use in conditionals, you solve both problems. Those objecting likely didn't understand the cause/effect or had just bought the dogmatic "thou shalt not assign in an iterator expression" and we're being dogmatic.
@@aflous if it's that simple, yes, but if there is more logic involved then the lambda function allows you to see it in the defaultdict rather than having to look at a separate function.
@@logaspam for sure yeah, I was answering regarding the example in the video. But I agree lambda makes much more sens here, but would only work if it can be written as a single statement
There is nothing particularly "anonymous" about the "_" variable; it is simply a variable named "_" that is anonymous by convention (you could also use "__", "___", etc). This is also used by convention in classes to designate private variables/methods (preceded by a single underscore) or special variables/methods (preceded and concluded with double underscores, the so-called "dunder" methods). Also, in your first walrus generation example it works fine, but better python code would be to have the generator simply yield the results (no "-1" sentinel value) and then for loop over it: def gen_data(): for i in range(10): yield i gen = gen_data() for i in gen: print(i)
Wow this video is really insightful! ❤ Walrus operator is new for me, so is the defaultdict! And I always wondered what those asterisks in f(*args, **kwargs)are. Today it made some sense, as they are unpack, double unpack operators! Everytime I see your video, I get to know about something unique. Thanks and keep it up. 🙌🏻
result = [f(x) for x in range(10) if f(x) > 3] Alternative 1: result = [x for x in (f(i) for i in range(10)) if x > 3] Alternative 2: result = (f(i) for i in range(10)) result = [x for x in result if x > 3] Both alternatives are more efficient than the original one
Hey Tim. Thanks for your inspiration. I wanted to share a little thing that i just discovered. I'm starting python. I was doing bash scripting for carrying out my maintenance and other stuff. I found when bash scripting, i was able to try out the commands on the command line. I just found that using python's command line interface, i can start to understand the different aspects of python. In my case, i find this a fantastic approach, especially if i have to use the sys or os modules (which i will read up in the near future) and start using the commands with pythons data structures. I bring this up as an alternative to jumping and writing a program (I'm a old dude that needs a purpose to program, and have completed many projects in my career and different positions). This approach allows one to get familiar with python and test out some syntax requirements with python. I believe for bash scripters, it may be a good bridge to cross between bash and python. Thanks again! Cheers
Crazy how i know everything he mentioned here and i still don’t consider myself a professional pythonista. And i learned all this on my first year with python. Anyway i recommend people to learn more from books, it is the only way to get all the knowledge with very few gaps, not knowing this that he talk about in the video after 3 years of coding with python really impressed me, taking in account that Tims likes learning more with books. I assume he just focused on subjects that matter to him, and probably skipped those subjects on his earlier stages learning python.
at 5:00 it is confusing for you to leave the i variable code for beginners like me. I really couldn't get why it was there, then I realized you just didn't remove it
Tim: This is something you might do while iterating over a for or while loop. Automatic subtitles: This is something you might do while iterating over a four or a wallop.
When using Defaultdict to count something, there's no need to define a special default function that returns 0. You can use the built in `int()` function (which returns 0 by default) like so: ``` d = Defaultdict(int) for i in some_iterable: d[i] += 1 ```
regarding the defaultdict ofc it's awesome, but the "counter" example is explanatory, but problematic, since: collections.Counter does it already ;-) ....and you will use it in your code: >>>Counter("abbccc") {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
The while...else syntax makes me queasy. But then, breaking from loops makes me queasy too 🤷♂️ (Consider: I have a very specific set of experiences... 😅)
Worth noting that for defaultdict, instead of calling your handmade function "default" you could have done the same thing by saying: char_count = defaultdict(int)
With walrus, we finally have what we always had in C just turning the meaning of the symbols upside down, a little like if we mixed Pascal and C to have Python but leaving hardly anything at its original place.
Tim I greatly appreciate what you teach and do but python Is getting a bit repetitive. I love python, it's great. It's my go-to language. but I would definitely like to see some other languages or other tech based topics on this channel. I'm also saying this because in your recent videos almost all your latest videos have pythons logo in the thumbnail lol. Still, love your work, love what you teach, keep it up. ❤️ ❤️
This comment is senseless, if you want to see C coding videos, isn’t it better to search for a channel that is mainly about C programming? Instead of trying to find it in a python programming channel?
@@jaylooppworld381 Tim dosent code every video in python and he does sometimes use other languages. And what if there are other videos on C? I like Tims way of explaining programs so that's why I asked him. He dosent HAVE to create a video just because a random guy said make a C video. But I just gave a few examples of which languages I wanted to see on the channel.
Literally none of those are hidden features. Walrus makes code less readable and more complex (not complicated) for no benefit whatever. Similarly for/else is notoriously difficult to read without a double take to understand what's going on, although it adnitedly does have it's niche uses on occasion.
please do not use that for/while else syntax. It's cool when you see it for the first time. But you forget how it works day later (usually people think "else" section executes if iterable is empty which is not the case).
Anonymous Variable. Uh You just named the variable underscore instead of whatever else you where gonna name it. ** unpack is cool but the example is funny because you change the args that are passed through but the print statement is still print(key, value) so the idea changing the function parse_values would do anything is a lil silly but the *, and ** unpacking is cool. I also Like the other ones listed. default dictionary is awesome, walrus operator is gonna take a second but the concept is cool. For/While else. Yea I mean I guess I just didn't think to do that why not.
I hate the else after the while … This just doesn’t make the code more readable … I guess “if break:” or “if not break:” would be more readable and more noticeable to any future maintainer who may add more break related logic to the loop … maybe I’m getting too old … bah humbug …
Your videos are very interesting. My only criticism would be your talking speed. Is it a race? I am fluent in Python, but English is not my first language. Just slow down a little bit. You have nothing to prove 😉
What on earth are you talking about? If you can't find a job as a field tech/ tech hand due to your local market, specialization in a field will allow you to market yourself to specialized fields. Growing in your specialization will require fundamentals such as the ones offered on the cert sites you mention. If you don't understand TCP/IP, Subnetting, Protocols, Security Configuration, etc... you should worry about that before concerning yourself with the status of the job market. This is invaluable knowledge in our society where every company and organization is fundamentals reliant upon these technologies. The people that built them will die one day, if everyone had your attitude we wouldn't have anyone to support those systems.
@@alchimyst4995 Which planet have you been living in the last 2 years ? Companies have been laying off staff in droves. Even on youtube here you can find oodles of videos that tell of mass layoffs by their employers and the sorry state of the tech sector.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
To learn programming and Python - check out Datacamp!
💻 Learn Python - datacamp.pxf.io/jrx366
💻 Learn Programming - datacamp.pxf.io/QyZrdx
Where is the guarantee that this announce about job is not just an empty words?
Tim I tried to email you about your course. Your email on your website doesn't work
We just had a student graduate and land a job in 3 weeks! Obviously we cannot guarantee a job but we’ve tailored the program specifically with that goal in mind.
send it to techwithtimm@viralnationtalent.com@@ayojoy1443
@@TechWithTimwhere can I check the agenda of the course? What are going to teach on this course?
- Utilize the underscore as a placeholder when declaring variables you do not intend to use to avoid syntax errors and clear confusion about the variable's role. 0:29
- Implement the 'else' statement with 'for' and 'while' loops to execute a block of code when the loop is not terminated by a 'break' statement, simplifying the need for flag variables. 3:00
- Explore the walrus operator (:=) in Python 3.8 for defining a value as part of a condition in loops, making code more readable and efficient. 6:22
- Apply argument and parameter unpacking using the asterisk (*) and double asterisk (**) operators for passing multiple arguments or keyword arguments from iterables or dictionaries to functions, enhancing code readability. 10:00
- Use the default dictionary from the collections module to automatically assign default values when accessing keys that do not exist, streamlining code that increments keys or processes missing keys. 13:20
#2 is rarely a good idea imo because its difficult to remember the semantics of this construct.
@lukekurlandski7653 true. I also don't use it because it makes my code look wrongly indented when there is an if inside my loop.
I was amazed at how much uproar the walrus operator caused when it arrived in Python 3.8. Your list comprehension example with the f(x) assignment is a clear use case that isn't possible (at least without something really convoluted) without it.
I agree, I've never cared much for walrus but seeing that example was a "duh" moment for me in understanding an awesome use for it
A common problem in C languages is someone doing:
while (x = my_func(y)) ...
instead of:
while (x == my_func(y)) ...
Which have very different meanings.
Python _avoided_ this problem by explicitly prohibiting assignment in conditional context.
The issue is you end up with people forgetting to update the evaluation variable at the end of the loop.
By introducing an explicit assignment syntax that's "safe" for use in conditionals, you solve both problems.
Those objecting likely didn't understand the cause/effect or had just bought the dogmatic "thou shalt not assign in an iterator expression" and we're being dogmatic.
The default value function in a defaultdict is a good place to use a lambda function.
No need, can simply use int
@@aflous if it's that simple, yes, but if there is more logic involved then the lambda function allows you to see it in the defaultdict rather than having to look at a separate function.
@@logaspam for sure yeah, I was answering regarding the example in the video. But I agree lambda makes much more sens here, but would only work if it can be written as a single statement
@@aflous I wrote lambda (single statement) that computed the partitions of an integer, so you can get pretty sick.
I’ve been learning coding for six months but I can say that your channel is the one that made me start to really love it. Thank you my man
Thanks!
Wow thank you!
In the last example we can alternatively use the dict idiom char_count[char] = char_count.get(char, 0) + 1
There is nothing particularly "anonymous" about the "_" variable; it is simply a variable named "_" that is anonymous by convention (you could also use "__", "___", etc). This is also used by convention in classes to designate private variables/methods (preceded by a single underscore) or special variables/methods (preceded and concluded with double underscores, the so-called "dunder" methods).
Also, in your first walrus generation example it works fine, but better python code would be to have the generator simply yield the results (no "-1" sentinel value) and then for loop over it:
def gen_data():
for i in range(10):
yield i
gen = gen_data()
for i in gen:
print(i)
Agree.
There is no need to try anonymize variables at all.
It points out to other dev reading your code that your variable is not intended to be used.
The int function can also be used in the defaultdict parameter. When you don't pass an argument to int(), by default it will return a 0.
Wow this video is really insightful! ❤
Walrus operator is new for me, so is the defaultdict!
And I always wondered what those asterisks in f(*args, **kwargs)are. Today it made some sense, as they are unpack, double unpack operators!
Everytime I see your video, I get to know about something unique. Thanks and keep it up. 🙌🏻
result = [f(x) for x in range(10) if f(x) > 3]
Alternative 1:
result = [x for x in (f(i) for i in range(10)) if x > 3]
Alternative 2:
result = (f(i) for i in range(10))
result = [x for x in result if x > 3]
Both alternatives are more efficient than the original one
Hey Tim. Thanks for your inspiration.
I wanted to share a little thing that i just discovered. I'm starting python. I was doing bash scripting for carrying out my maintenance and other stuff. I found when bash scripting, i was able to try out the commands on the command line. I just found that using python's command line interface, i can start to understand the different aspects of python. In my case, i find this a fantastic approach, especially if i have to use the sys or os modules (which i will read up in the near future) and start using the commands with pythons data structures.
I bring this up as an alternative to jumping and writing a program (I'm a old dude that needs a purpose to program, and have completed many projects in my career and different positions). This approach allows one to get familiar with python and test out some syntax requirements with python. I believe for bash scripters, it may be a good bridge to cross between bash and python.
Thanks again!
Cheers
I enjoyed our video as I learned several Python features of which I was unfamiliar.
You could also do defaultdict(int)
Great explanation of the usefulness of the walrus operator, all became clear. Thanks.
16:12 why not use Counter from collection for this case ;) ?
Athough I know some of the features, I love this video. Useful. Thanks.😁😁😁
Crazy how i know everything he mentioned here and i still don’t consider myself a professional pythonista. And i learned all this on my first year with python. Anyway i recommend people to learn more from books, it is the only way to get all the knowledge with very few gaps, not knowing this that he talk about in the video after 3 years of coding with python really impressed me, taking in account that Tims likes learning more with books. I assume he just focused on subjects that matter to him, and probably skipped those subjects on his earlier stages learning python.
*Hi Tim! Am new subscriber. Thank you for sharing about these 5 must know hidden features! 🍁🌿*
Thanks for being a new sub!!
at 5:00 it is confusing for you to leave the i variable code for beginners like me. I really couldn't get why it was there, then I realized you just didn't remove it
You mean asterisk rather than asterix. The latter is a French comic character from Asterix The Gaul
Tim: This is something you might do while iterating over a for or while loop.
Automatic subtitles: This is something you might do while iterating over a four or a wallop.
When using Defaultdict to count something, there's no need to define a special default function that returns 0.
You can use the built in `int()` function (which returns 0 by default) like so:
```
d = Defaultdict(int)
for i in some_iterable:
d[i] += 1
```
Thanks Tim !
The walrus operator is much appreciated in Machine Learning !!
regarding the defaultdict ofc it's awesome, but the "counter" example is explanatory, but problematic, since:
collections.Counter
does it already ;-) ....and you will use it in your code:
>>>Counter("abbccc")
{a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
great list Tim
Love your hallway!
@TechWithtTim what key caps do you use? I love the sound
for the char_count, you dont need a whole function for it, you can use a lambda:
char_count = defaultdict(lambda: 0)
you are close to1000 vids. you can do it✌
very well organized :)) And thank you so much to let me know this cute expression :=
The while...else syntax makes me queasy.
But then, breaking from loops makes me queasy too 🤷♂️
(Consider: I have a very specific set of experiences... 😅)
Worth noting that for defaultdict, instead of calling your handmade function "default" you could have done the same thing by saying:
char_count = defaultdict(int)
DO NOT USE FOR/ELSE
The founder of python said that it was his biggest mistake to allow this to be added to python
“Asterix” is a cartoon character; “asterisk” is a star-shaped special character.
With walrus, we finally have what we always had in C just turning the meaning of the symbols upside down, a little like if we mixed Pascal and C to have Python but leaving hardly anything at its original place.
Good tips!
omg, I can help it. for star magic:
>>>numbers = print
>>>numbers(*lst)
I know, it was a toy example.
thank you very much.
I use defaultdict and pass list as argument then just append stuff to the key something like d = defaultdict(list) d[key].append(“item”)
Great stuff
for grabbing the second element of a list of containers, I kinda like:
>>>second = list(map(itertools.itemgetter(2), list_of_containers))
I would use this instead of For/While Else.
items =["a", "b", "c", "d"]
if "z" in items:
print("yes")
else:
print("No")
Tim I greatly appreciate what you teach and do but python Is getting a bit repetitive. I love python, it's great. It's my go-to language. but I would definitely like to see some other languages or other tech based topics on this channel. I'm also saying this because in your recent videos almost all your latest videos have pythons logo in the thumbnail lol. Still, love your work, love what you teach, keep it up. ❤️ ❤️
Thanks for the feedback I’ll definitely keep it in mind! What languages do you want to see?
@@TechWithTim i would really appreciate a video about C, js or maybe some front-end content. Thanks for listening!
This comment is senseless, if you want to see C coding videos, isn’t it better to search for a channel that is mainly about C programming? Instead of trying to find it in a python programming channel?
@@jaylooppworld381 Tim dosent code every video in python and he does sometimes use other languages. And what if there are other videos on C? I like Tims way of explaining programs so that's why I asked him. He dosent HAVE to create a video just because a random guy said make a C video. But I just gave a few examples of which languages I wanted to see on the channel.
I would use char_count = defaultdict(int)
Literally none of those are hidden features. Walrus makes code less readable and more complex (not complicated) for no benefit whatever. Similarly for/else is notoriously difficult to read without a double take to understand what's going on, although it adnitedly does have it's niche uses on occasion.
Did you look at the walrus use cases I presented, often times you can increase code efficiency
please do not use that for/while else syntax. It's cool when you see it for the first time. But you forget how it works day later (usually people think "else" section executes if iterable is empty which is not the case).
Anonymous Variable. Uh You just named the variable underscore instead of whatever else you where gonna name it. ** unpack is cool but the example is funny because you change the args that are passed through but the print statement is still print(key, value) so the idea changing the function parse_values would do anything is a lil silly but the *, and ** unpacking is cool. I also Like the other ones listed. default dictionary is awesome, walrus operator is gonna take a second but the concept is cool. For/While else. Yea I mean I guess I just didn't think to do that why not.
The very fact that these features are HIDDEN, means the code is harder to read.
That last one seems a little esoteric. Is it really used much?
I hate the else after the while … This just doesn’t make the code more readable … I guess “if break:” or “if not break:” would be more readable and more noticeable to any future maintainer who may add more break related logic to the loop … maybe I’m getting too old … bah humbug …
How would you get to the if break? I feel like you would have create another variable
What sorts of jobs I can do with just python in freelancing. Please mention some of it
Thumbnail just saying me please learn python,
Me: ok
I also love that Swift has some of these features as well, albeit with different syntax.
Your videos are very interesting. My only criticism would be your talking speed. Is it a race? I am fluent in Python, but English is not my first language. Just slow down a little bit. You have nothing to prove 😉
BEST
Do Canadians say “zed” instead of “Zee”?
No, Americans say "Zee" instead of "Zed".
Could you make a tutorial on hosting an llm from hugging face onto a free server or domain?
Including how make a ui for it
Pleaseee
all available in kotlin....
Wahhhh! There are plenty of embedded jobs for real programmers.
This for/while else is a dumb way of doing that. You can just use if 'item' in items, else
I heard "python is a fas"
And my brain instantly thought he was going to say fast. I was like okkkkkk yeeaaeah... right... fast 😂
You called this 101 🤣😂🤣
Nice try! 🙄
There're no more IT jobs on the market, so it's pointless to go onto any of the training courses.
All the indians are stealing our jobs
What on earth are you talking about? If you can't find a job as a field tech/ tech hand due to your local market, specialization in a field will allow you to market yourself to specialized fields. Growing in your specialization will require fundamentals such as the ones offered on the cert sites you mention. If you don't understand TCP/IP, Subnetting, Protocols, Security Configuration, etc... you should worry about that before concerning yourself with the status of the job market.
This is invaluable knowledge in our society where every company and organization is fundamentals reliant upon these technologies. The people that built them will die one day, if everyone had your attitude we wouldn't have anyone to support those systems.
@@alchimyst4995 Which planet have you been living in the last 2 years ? Companies have been laying off staff in droves. Even on youtube here you can find oodles of videos that tell of mass layoffs by their employers and the sorry state of the tech sector.
No, he's right.
LOL. Interesting that I just got hired like 2 weeks ago...
PLEASE DO A TUTORIAL ON FLET LIBRARY🥲