Hi, I am have to generate a Simulink model that uses inputs and informations of another Simulink model with Matlab Code. Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
hi great video, anyone knows how to get rsim.tlc? for doing rtwbuild(model) , I do not have simulink coder or matlab coder, just matlab and simulink. thanks!
Hi, really it is very helpful and easy to understand video. could you please like to give me the answer of my question. when I using plot command, figure appear without line/plot. MATLAB 2015a my info is as: >>opengl info Version: '1.1.0' Vendor: 'Microsoft Corporation' Renderer: 'GDI Generic' MaxTextureSize: 1024 Visual: 'Visual 0xc2, (RGB 24 bits (8 8 8), Z depth 16 bits, Software, Single buffer, Antia...' Software: 'true' SupportsGraphicsSmoothing: 0 SupportsDepthPeelTransparency: 0 SupportsAlignVertexCenters: 0 Extensions: {3x1 cell} MaxFrameBufferSize: 0
I hate how you all ruined the fun part of Embedded Systems. You automated writing Control Algorithms in C/C++ and interfacing it within the microcontroller, ruining everything for me. I wanted to do this myself yet you all had to take that away. Now that you’ve destroyed any sort of fun I would have had with this, there’s no point in getting a job in Embedded Systems/Robotics if you’re going to take everything that’s fun away from those who want to write those control algorithms themselves. Time to look into another career field now.
I understand where you're coming from. The joy of directly coding C/C++ to interface with microcontrollers is something many cherish, and automation can feel like it's taking that away. You're not alone in feeling this way, as many programmers share similar concerns with the rise of AI-generated code. However, I believe there is still value in pursuing a career in Embedded Systems/Robotics. While automation might change the way we work, it also opens doors for us to engage in higher-level roles, focusing on designing, simulating logic, and testing outputs. These aspects can be just as creative and rewarding, offering new ways to apply your skills and passion.
@@Creative_Sushi-iu4hm There is nothing joyful about those proposed aspects of the jobs. Design is nothing more than design which indent give the same thrill as actually writing those Control Algorithns. Testing is unbelievably boring. Simulating logic is nothing as well. There is nothing rewarding about anything you’ve suggested and as such, nothing is left exciting in this industry. If it means not being able to write these algorithms from scratch, then there is no point in being in this field anymore as all of the exciting stuff is completely gone.
Can you show a simple example so that I can understand the workflow of simulink and embedded generation..?
1:58 there's a laughing sound in the background, great work environment
This was actually really helpful, thank you!!
Glad it was helpful!
Hi,
I am have to generate a Simulink model that uses inputs and informations of another Simulink model with Matlab Code.
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
Thank you for sharing.
Sadly none of this is available for Matlab's home license owners
hi great video, anyone knows how to get rsim.tlc? for doing rtwbuild(model) , I do not have simulink coder or matlab coder, just matlab and simulink. thanks!
I don't know why at 0:32 if that was suppose to be sarcastic lol
there is zero chemistry between these two guys :) a very beneficial presentation nonetheless.
at least they tried for the learnig , no matter how they did that , they were very useful and PERFECT
They are not shooting porn.
The blonde guy just stared into my soul
Hi, really it is very helpful and easy to understand video. could you please like to give me the answer of my question. when I using plot command, figure appear without line/plot. MATLAB 2015a my info is as:
>>opengl info
Version: '1.1.0'
Vendor: 'Microsoft Corporation'
Renderer: 'GDI Generic'
MaxTextureSize: 1024
Visual: 'Visual 0xc2, (RGB 24 bits (8 8 8), Z depth 16 bits, Software, Single buffer, Antia...'
Software: 'true'
SupportsGraphicsSmoothing: 0
SupportsDepthPeelTransparency: 0
SupportsAlignVertexCenters: 0
Extensions: {3x1 cell}
MaxFrameBufferSize: 0
Niceeeeeeeeeeeeeee ❤️❤️❤️
I hate how you all ruined the fun part of Embedded Systems. You automated writing Control Algorithms in C/C++ and interfacing it within the microcontroller, ruining everything for me. I wanted to do this myself yet you all had to take that away. Now that you’ve destroyed any sort of fun I would have had with this, there’s no point in getting a job in Embedded Systems/Robotics if you’re going to take everything that’s fun away from those who want to write those control algorithms themselves. Time to look into another career field now.
I understand where you're coming from. The joy of directly coding C/C++ to interface with microcontrollers is something many cherish, and automation can feel like it's taking that away. You're not alone in feeling this way, as many programmers share similar concerns with the rise of AI-generated code. However, I believe there is still value in pursuing a career in Embedded Systems/Robotics. While automation might change the way we work, it also opens doors for us to engage in higher-level roles, focusing on designing, simulating logic, and testing outputs. These aspects can be just as creative and rewarding, offering new ways to apply your skills and passion.
@@Creative_Sushi-iu4hm There is nothing joyful about those proposed aspects of the jobs. Design is nothing more than design which indent give the same thrill as actually writing those Control Algorithns. Testing is unbelievably boring. Simulating logic is nothing as well. There is nothing rewarding about anything you’ve suggested and as such, nothing is left exciting in this industry. If it means not being able to write these algorithms from scratch, then there is no point in being in this field anymore as all of the exciting stuff is completely gone.
ihr könnt deutsch sprechen, bin auch deutsch ;)
But we are not.
Damn right you're not... Why tf would i leave such a stupid comment...lmao