@@hitthefloorlpu2003 DC10 had some structural design errors they handled. Max had a software oddity they omitted from the pilot training. All because of the profit over safety.
14:30 - No 737s are made in China. There is a "finishing" plant there to complete interiors. All Boeing 737s are manufactured in Renton, Washington. Fuselages arrive by rail from Spirit in Wichita, Kansas. Thus every Boeing 737 becomes the only aircraft to fly under both the Rocky and the Cascade Mountain ranges.
So, that doesn't mean they build Boeing aircraft there. They build GM and Ford engines in Mexico, assemble the cars in Michigan. So do we say the car was built in Mexico? Boeing has componets built all over the world, and assembles them in Renton and Everett. The typical modern industrial model (except most do the assembly overseas instead). And if China makes plenty of Boeing components, that doesn't mean they make any _737_ components there, which is what we are discussing. They could produce entire 787s in China, tht wouldn't make him wrong to say that no 737s are built in China.
Large sales do not guarantee safety. 'Now' they are good, but originally had horrible safety record one of the worst in airliner history. Actually similar story for original 747.'s Now lets see if the truth once again is omitted to appease the wealthy schmucks.
This video was really well done. You are extremely thorough with your research. It can't imagine how long it takes you to prepare a script. I really appreciate the work you did here. Many thanks!
Great plane, Boeing 737 regularly fly on Ryanair's '700s', as well as its earlier '200' series. It also has an excellent safety record, all considered - but then again, all modern airliners have that reputation nowadays.
Maybe a challenge for you to speak, but not a challenge to listen to it. There are gazillions of videos on youtube, made by people whose native language is English, and they are sometimes barely understandable. Of course it is obvious that it is not your native language (and neither is it mine), but, it is clearly worth a "thumbs up".
The real reason is because the 737 was the best offer in the 60s. And when the A320 came into service late in the 80s it was easier for the 737 clients to keep flying the model. Also important to note, despite being an old school, older concept, Boeing managed to make it as efficient as the A320. That’s why the 737 will hold the crown of the most successful aircraft (in term of sales) for one or two more years. The crown will probably change before 2021 or 2022 with a bigger number of A320s in the skies. Even when the MAX returns, it won’t be enough to change the sales trend. I just hope Airbus doesn’t make the same error with the A320 as Boeing did with the 737.
I worked at P&WA in the late 70s assembling JT8 engines. We used to see the build codes and many were for aircraft for Alaska Airlines. Then I made a life changing choice and moved to Alaska and flew back and forth to work in the oil field. I’d tell my friends that I might have helped build that engine.
For everyone who commented before bashing on the 737, the MAX is the version with the issues. Boeing should not have offered a reduced AOA package, should have offered better training, and finally, the MCAS should have been able to be cut out fully in the event of failure. Those items are being rectified, and I see no reason once those things have been ironed out why those aircraft will not be great performers.
Thanks for one more great video on your channel! I guess there is some info missing about cockpit and cabin generations. As far as I know, there have been four generations of cockpits: 1. The original one, all analog gauges 2. The "Classic" one with the two screens on each side 3. The all-electronic NG cockpit (where at least one airline used the screens to look like the "Classic" instruments) 3. The upgraded MAX with bigger screens The interior generations are harder to describe since elements were mixed during later modifications. Obviously there are different wall panels (more rectangular window cover frames or mor oval shaped), different overhead bins (opening upwards in at least three sizes, swing down models in different varieties, like from the old 767 to the dreamliner), and a plethora of different seat models. But one thing remains: The old door derived from the 707. (At least up to the -900) You still need to bend down to engage/disengage the slide and place that ridiculous red strip over the window. On an Airbus the slide is engaged using a lever, and disengages automatically when the door is opened from the outside. Sounds like rocket science to Boeing. :-P But apart from that addition, did you ever consider making great videos like this about Soviet made aircraft or newer models from Russia? People in this part of the world are much less familiar with them and at least I would love to know more about them. Thank you!
@@johnnyboythepilot4098 No, the core of the A320 is 30 years younger, if you go back to the 707, 20 years younger based on the actual 737. Ha4dly young, but 20 years is a big difference.
If Joe Sutter designed the Max, there wouldn't be any problem with it at all. I love your videos! I like the comparisons between aircrafts. It was an in depth information. You are very good at this. I actually watched til the end. Well done!
I must admit that this is an excellent video on the Boeing 737. Everything is well explained and well detailed without dragging on too much. I like the Boeing 737 for its reliability and durability. But I must admit that its design is outdated and that the Airbus A320 or the Embraer E170/E190 are much more beautiful airliners. I hope the successor of the Boeing 737 will have a completely new design.
Why is it 'oudated'? The important part of a plane is the wing, engines and tail. the fuselage is just a tube. The wings, tail and engines on the 737 are totally new, why does it matter if the fuselage is still using the same old architecture? How pretty it is has nothing to do with how good an aircraft is (and personally I like the look of the 737 better). nd in any case, I thinkk you will find that the fuselage of the modern 737 doesn't actually share much with the original except overall dimensions, appearance and the general architecture. it has been changed extensively over the years.
In December of 2004, I was still able to fly on a B737-100 (or 200) by Air Philippines! That was also my first experience of flying (in an airplane). Watching those thrust reversers as they fold post-landing was a fascinating sight. Those birds fly no more! They were already retired.
The main gear was designed (a million years ago) with simple trucks and fat low pressure tires that can handle operations from primitive dirt fields before modern paved airports proliferated...
Even before I saw the video I knew I'd like it. Great work. Keep it up, it puts a smile on my face when I come home and see there's one of these published.
I really like the 737 even the 777 and 787 are my top 2 favs. I think the 737 is a revolutionary plane behind the DC-3 and 747. The 737 changed the face of the single isle plane market and passenger transport we see today. It next to the 747 are the only planes in commercial history to go through so many upgrades from the 737 Original Series to 737 Classic to 737 Next Generation to 737 Max. I mean that wasn't easy at all for Boeing. 737 continue to make strides and will always do. Even tho the a320 giving the 737 a run of competition but I must admit I love the 737 more for how far it has come and where it is now especially with the 737 Max. I have always said this and will continue to say it..."Airbus has the easier side of the plane manufacturing market and Boeing does the hard and dirty work". Not saying I don't like Airbus, both are really good and has put out a lot but history tell the rest. For all those who go with the a320 because if its fly-by-wire, state of the art flight deck, side-stick, etc over the 737, no heart feelings but all I can say is that 'probably' there wouldn't be an a320 if there wasn't a 737. Long live the 737!!!
In other words you saying that Airbus has been copying Boeing. I have flown in jets planes from both companies and I couldn't tell much difference basically.
An additional version of the B737 is flying - the B737-900ER (Extended Range) version. It has more powerful engines, fuel capacity and a higher maximum gross takeoff weight. The B737-900 standard version has a MGTOW of 174,200 lbs (the same as MGTOW for the B737-800); on the B737-900ER it is 187,700 lbs. Compared to the -800, the -900/-900ER handle like a truck, and for me, it wasn't nearly as fun to fly, nor to land. My all-time favorite was the B737-300 Classic round-dial (non-EFIS/glass panel). It was Boeing's first iteration of the next generation of 737 after the -100/-200, hence it was a new design without any modifications or fuselage extensions. It was one of the best-balanced aircraft that I've ever flown, and it was very easy to land. The -900ER is harder to land well because the final approach speed (Vref) has to be artificially increased due to the extended fuselage to prevent tail strikes (150-160 knots vs. 130-135 knots for the classic). The same is true for takeoff - rotation speed (when the nose is pulled up to lift off) is also artificially increased, for the same reason. The B737ER can be identified by an extra escape hatch on each side of the aircraft, behind the wing. On some aircraft it is a functioning escape hatch, required because of the passenger capacity of the aircraft. On 737-900ERs operated by United, Delta, American, and some other carriers, the outline of the hatch is visible on the exterior of the aircraft, but not on the inside of the airplane, since it is non-functional (not required to be due to lower seating capacity). Otherwise, the B737-900 standard and the B737-900ER are identical in appearance. A final point is regarding the "winglets" (the vertical wing extensions at the wingtips). For our airline, the first version was called a "blended winglet", which was only swept upward. Because it reduces "induced drag" at the wingtips, we realized a 3 - 5% savings in fuel burn over non-winglet equipped aircraft. The next version of winglet (which was installed on our aircraft well in advance of the B737 MAXs first flights by our company) was called a "scimitar winglet", with extensions pointing both up and down at the wingtip. The scimitars were installed on all of our B737NGs due to the additional fuel savings that they offered (another 3 - 6%).
0:10 sky: ...the most epic... With an automatic crash program and an engine so greatly planned it makes the whole plane point upwards, B737Max really the most epic plane ever
Looking back at this... Boeing screwed over a bit with the MAX update. But the legacy the 737 created still cannot be forgotten, nor ignored. Especially now.
The reason the 737 in known as the barefoot Boeing is that the weight of the wheel doors, would affect performance of the 737. The -500 had the name -2000 in the beginning. Braathens S.A.F.E (BU, 05) was to the lounch costumer for the -500, but Southwest beat them to it. BU asked Boeing if the could make a smaller verson of the -300 as a replacement for the -200. Boeing said yes.
works well with the newer point to point, non hub system where people want to fly from one small city to another, such as Dover DE, to Bremen, or Asheville to Walla Walla.
10,000 Stubee's sold, that indicates operators are raking in the cash, using the 737, I'm a 757, 747, 767 Lover, but you can't dismiss the 40+ years of success, the 737 has given Boeing and the carriers. Well done
B-737 IS AND HAS BEEN A "WORK HORSE" AND THE MAX VERSIONS WILL BE ONCE AVIONICS AND TRAINING IS COMPLETED. A VERY INFORMATIVE VIDEO OF THE BOEING 737 FAMILY. THANKS!
I think the 757 is the best Boeing as it’s the most revolutionary Aircraft now as all the airlineswant the 757 in their fleet that’s why the 797 is a 757 Modernised.
Skyships Eng big as in long? I hope! Your videos are very interesting and enjoyable. I'm personally a huge fan of old Soviet aviation so I can't wait. Can I leave a few requests? IL-62, TU-154, TU-114, IL-18, TU-144, TU-134 and YAK-40.
![Boeing 737 Cannot Land Anywhere | All Engines Flameout [With Real Audio]](/img/1.gif)
The Boeing 737 is the Toyota Corolla is the aviation world.
Destiny's Computer I agree with you.
@@nitchmakes7550 -- Except The MAX.. that was due Managers faults..
No way; That's the Airbus A320. The 737 is more like the BMW 3-series - fun to drive
@proteusx A 737 or 737 MAX?
*RealLifeLore* would like to know your location
And then a year later
737 max: I'm about to end this flagship's entire career
dc 10 is worse than the max
barricade gaming personally yes since it crashed and kill ALOT for people but since it’s the past
barricade gaming yes but that was in 1971…
@@lavergnee still the dc 10 sucks
@@hitthefloorlpu2003 DC10 had some structural design errors they handled. Max had a software oddity they omitted from the pilot training. All because of the profit over safety.
What made the 737 last so long was the fact Boeing was able to turn it into a true 727-200 successor.
They had not so good a record either. One of the worst.
Well it is basically a 727
It is basically a 727 with extra steps
@@ahuman8407 Technically the B737 is a B727 mod with twin engines
Look at the 727, they look alike except the tail
14:30 - No 737s are made in China. There is a "finishing" plant there to complete interiors. All Boeing 737s are manufactured in Renton, Washington. Fuselages arrive by rail from Spirit in Wichita, Kansas. Thus every Boeing 737 becomes the only aircraft to fly under both the Rocky and the Cascade Mountain ranges.
Dead Frt West yes and actually aircraft is the 2nd highest grossing trade from china
Plenty of Chinese manufactured components on Boeings these days.
@@Deca.Knight That doesn't mean that they build _Boeing_ aircraft there.
So, that doesn't mean they build Boeing aircraft there. They build GM and Ford engines in Mexico, assemble the cars in Michigan. So do we say the car was built in Mexico? Boeing has componets built all over the world, and assembles them in Renton and Everett. The typical modern industrial model (except most do the assembly overseas instead). And if China makes plenty of Boeing components, that doesn't mean they make any _737_ components there, which is what we are discussing. They could produce entire 787s in China, tht wouldn't make him wrong to say that no 737s are built in China.
"The most popular airliner'
737-Max: "Hold my beer."
I think you mean "hold my MCAS"
Hold my Jet Fuel
Yes, but you are a bit incorrect. The video was made even before first B737-8 MAX Lion Air crash, the original in Russian about one month earlier.
737 max is a great plane the dc 10 was worse
@@77l96737 max is the best
lol that ryanair landing in the beggining
Think I've seen one where the pilot engaged the thrust reversers midflight ahahahahaha
Swiss001?
@@Robbiebraich what does he have anything to do with this?
Lol 911
Ikr
10000 planes? Damn they're good!
500 planes a year
better than scarebus
Lol
Trash4Cash , the MAX has around 5000 orders alone besides the NG orders yet to be fulfilled
Large sales do not guarantee safety. 'Now' they are good, but originally had horrible safety record one of the worst in airliner history. Actually similar story for original 747.'s Now lets see if the truth once again is omitted to appease the wealthy schmucks.
is it weird that i think you are the same guy who voiced the Wings of Russia Documentries
I thought it was a Maffia Don in 1867 ;p (Maffia Boss)
Hassan El Ghabed Jjdjdd level 737 mafia boss
@Jonah DiGiacomo Good one
No way. Lol
B737-800 has considered as the world's safest commercial Aircraft.
This video was really well done. You are extremely thorough with your research. It can't imagine how long it takes you to prepare a script. I really appreciate the work you did here. Many thanks!
It's a big work. I'm glad you like it)
Great plane, Boeing 737 regularly fly on Ryanair's '700s', as well as its earlier '200' series. It also has an excellent safety record, all considered - but then again, all modern airliners have that reputation nowadays.
Your Channel is Just perfect. And i can understend your english perfectly
ifp stop motions Yeah my english is a challenge)
Maybe a challenge for you to speak, but not a challenge to listen to it. There are gazillions of videos on youtube, made by people whose native language is English, and they are sometimes barely understandable.
Of course it is obvious that it is not your native language (and neither is it mine), but, it is clearly worth a "thumbs up".
I rather enjoy your accent.
I don't think I've found a point where I struggled to understand you- I think you are doing very well
Oh well lots of propaganda with a smile on your face??
@@SkyshipsEng Well, Skyships, the thing that makes you favorite is the fact that you talk slower, so most of US could understand.
Pratt & Whitney JT8D was also used on the MD-80
And DC9 and 727
The real reason is because the 737 was the best offer in the 60s. And when the A320 came into service late in the 80s it was easier for the 737 clients to keep flying the model. Also important to note, despite being an old school, older concept, Boeing managed to make it as efficient as the A320.
That’s why the 737 will hold the crown of the most successful aircraft (in term of sales) for one or two more years.
The crown will probably change before 2021 or 2022 with a bigger number of A320s in the skies.
Even when the MAX returns, it won’t be enough to change the sales trend.
I just hope Airbus doesn’t make the same error with the A320 as Boeing did with the 737.
I worked at P&WA in the late 70s assembling JT8 engines. We used to see the build codes and many were for aircraft for Alaska Airlines. Then I made a life changing choice and moved to Alaska and flew back and forth to work in the oil field. I’d tell my friends that I might have helped build that engine.
For everyone who commented before bashing on the 737, the MAX is the version with the issues. Boeing should not have offered a reduced AOA package, should have offered better training, and finally, the MCAS should have been able to be cut out fully in the event of failure. Those items are being rectified, and I see no reason once those things have been ironed out why those aircraft will not be great performers.
Thanks for one more great video on your channel!
I guess there is some info missing about cockpit and cabin generations. As far as I know, there have been four generations of cockpits:
1. The original one, all analog gauges
2. The "Classic" one with the two screens on each side
3. The all-electronic NG cockpit (where at least one airline used the screens to look like the "Classic" instruments)
3. The upgraded MAX with bigger screens
The interior generations are harder to describe since elements were mixed during later modifications.
Obviously there are different wall panels (more rectangular window cover frames or mor oval shaped), different overhead bins (opening upwards in at least three sizes, swing down models in different varieties, like from the old 767 to the dreamliner), and a plethora of different seat models. But one thing remains: The old door derived from the 707. (At least up to the -900) You still need to bend down to engage/disengage the slide and place that ridiculous red strip over the window. On an Airbus the slide is engaged using a lever, and disengages automatically when the door is opened from the outside. Sounds like rocket science to Boeing. :-P
But apart from that addition, did you ever consider making great videos like this about Soviet made aircraft or newer models from Russia? People in this part of the world are much less familiar with them and at least I would love to know more about them. Thank you!
a video on the legendary flying pencil is needed too. best narrow body ever
It's amazing to see the evolution of just the engines. The originals were so small and loud and inefficient.
They should bring those engines back. They sounded mean. Fuck the fuel economy.
@@TheGalacticEmperorOfLabels chill bro its importand to save our planet from climate change or will DIE within 100 years
Your videos are awesome ✌
Thank you)
Anurag Shirke I
See?
I learn more from internet than in school
This is like history class
Damn straight son. Aviation history.👍
hededcdn HELL YAS
DNZ_Playz -Gaming I agree, the American school system needs a rework however there’s still many reasons to pay attention in class.
YE
Awesome video. Boeing 737s are my favorite plane.
Indonesia Aviation Me too!
why?
Why are you asking someone about their opinion?
Me too! Well my favorite commercial aircraft 😜
daconor91 its a vey well rounded aircraft. And it actually flys like an aircraft, not to big and not too small
O melhor avião! Não é atoa que é o mais vendido até hoje!
A320?
My airplane! I have over 16,000 hours at the controls of 737s from the 100 through the 700 models! Spoiled me for any other aircraft!.
not gonna lie guy sounds like borat, I LIKE!!!!👍🏻
Chirag Bhakta because it’s Russian English, for our community it sounds not very bad)
"You'll never fly this...you'll never fly this". And then...he flew this.
Take down that comment. *Now!*
@@Comrade320 Thick Russian accent? Thought so
This channel is the best show since Wings on the Discovery channel.
737s for life
FirstOfficerShami
Sadly they’re not gonna be there for long
Amazing that the 737-200 and 727 still fly as VIP and cargos today.
Thanks for this 737 review. With the plethora of models, and generations built over the years, it is difficult to differentiate one from the other.
The 737 is such a legendary plane. Wow
Best plane ever
It's never been my fav Boeing, but damn, you can't deny its epic success and ongoing popularity.
That MAX popping up as you said "Hello, aviators!" was hilarious xD
In a dark humor kind of way.
737 is actually a re-engineered Boeing 707 making the 737 almost 70 years old. Wow
Same story for the A330neo or A320neo. Both utilize +30 year old fuselages.
@@johnnyboythepilot4098 No, the core of the A320 is 30 years younger, if you go back to the 707, 20 years younger based on the actual 737. Ha4dly young, but 20 years is a big difference.
If Joe Sutter designed the Max, there wouldn't be any problem with it at all. I love your videos! I like the comparisons between aircrafts. It was an in depth information. You are very good at this. I actually watched til the end. Well done!
The Max would have been an amazing aircraft if they didn't F it up with the MCAS software and not informing pilots properly
Original : upgrade
Classic : more upgrade
NG : even more upgrade
MAX : fuck, go back
0:58 "And, I might add, around 1200 aircraft of this model are flying in the air right now."
2020: Maybe not.
737 forever ..
Oh boy my fluffy baby has gone a really long way. Love those silly, illogically placed switches in its cockpit :)
I must admit that this is an excellent video on the Boeing 737. Everything is well explained and well detailed without dragging on too much. I like the Boeing 737 for its reliability and durability. But I must admit that its design is outdated and that the Airbus A320 or the Embraer E170/E190 are much more beautiful airliners. I hope the successor of the Boeing 737 will have a completely new design.
Seems a bit outdated because a 737 is actually heavily modified and adjusted 707. Appearance wise, concept is quite identical.
Sometimes rugged is key,planes need to be in the air as much as possible to make money.
Why is it 'oudated'? The important part of a plane is the wing, engines and tail. the fuselage is just a tube. The wings, tail and engines on the 737 are totally new, why does it matter if the fuselage is still using the same old architecture? How pretty it is has nothing to do with how good an aircraft is (and personally I like the look of the 737 better). nd in any case, I thinkk you will find that the fuselage of the modern 737 doesn't actually share much with the original except overall dimensions, appearance and the general architecture. it has been changed extensively over the years.
@@justforever96 no disagreement here. Just saying that it is high time Boeing developed a completely new successor to the legendary 737.
0:18
*butter*
Lol
Ryanair
100, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, 10!
In December of 2004, I was still able to fly on a B737-100 (or 200) by Air Philippines! That was also my first experience of flying (in an airplane). Watching those thrust reversers as they fold post-landing was a fascinating sight.
Those birds fly no more! They were already retired.
U might have flown a 200 only 30 100s were built
@@Lee247Jamaica Probably.
@@yengsabio5315 yh
The main gear was designed (a million years ago) with simple trucks and fat low pressure tires that can handle operations from primitive dirt fields before modern paved airports proliferated...
What's your point
Even before I saw the video I knew I'd like it. Great work. Keep it up, it puts a smile on my face when I come home and see there's one of these published.
I really like the 737 even the 777 and 787 are my top 2 favs. I think the 737 is a revolutionary plane behind the DC-3 and 747. The 737 changed the face of the single isle plane market and passenger transport we see today. It next to the 747 are the only planes in commercial history to go through so many upgrades from the 737 Original Series to 737 Classic to 737 Next Generation to 737 Max. I mean that wasn't easy at all for Boeing. 737 continue to make strides and will always do. Even tho the a320 giving the 737 a run of competition but I must admit I love the 737 more for how far it has come and where it is now especially with the 737 Max. I have always said this and will continue to say it..."Airbus has the easier side of the plane manufacturing market and Boeing does the hard and dirty work". Not saying I don't like Airbus, both are really good and has put out a lot but history tell the rest. For all those who go with the a320 because if its fly-by-wire, state of the art flight deck, side-stick, etc over the 737, no heart feelings but all I can say is that 'probably' there wouldn't be an a320 if there wasn't a 737. Long live the 737!!!
Andrew Cunnison Nice Comment!
In other words you saying that Airbus has been copying Boeing. I have flown in jets planes from both companies and I couldn't tell much difference basically.
Nevertheless a French branch of Airbus(1955) and a British branch of Airbus(1949) had their jet airliners before the Boeing 707(1957)
I'd rather use the three engined Boeing 727-200 because it's quieter due to its rear-mounted engine arrangement
Skyships didn't get into detail why the 737 became the most popular airliner.
Great video.☺️
Very good! - interesting and coll edited, Thumbs Up !
The narration made me subscribe to this channel!
An additional version of the B737 is flying - the B737-900ER (Extended Range) version. It has more powerful engines, fuel capacity and a higher maximum gross takeoff weight. The B737-900 standard version has a MGTOW of 174,200 lbs (the same as MGTOW for the B737-800); on the B737-900ER it is 187,700 lbs.
Compared to the -800, the -900/-900ER handle like a truck, and for me, it wasn't nearly as fun to fly, nor to land. My all-time favorite was the B737-300 Classic round-dial (non-EFIS/glass panel). It was Boeing's first iteration of the next generation of 737 after the -100/-200, hence it was a new design without any modifications or fuselage extensions. It was one of the best-balanced aircraft that I've ever flown, and it was very easy to land.
The -900ER is harder to land well because the final approach speed (Vref) has to be artificially increased due to the extended fuselage to prevent tail strikes (150-160 knots vs. 130-135 knots for the classic). The same is true for takeoff - rotation speed (when the nose is pulled up to lift off) is also artificially increased, for the same reason.
The B737ER can be identified by an extra escape hatch on each side of the aircraft, behind the wing. On some aircraft it is a functioning escape hatch, required because of the passenger capacity of the aircraft. On 737-900ERs operated by United, Delta, American, and some other carriers, the outline of the hatch is visible on the exterior of the aircraft, but not on the inside of the airplane, since it is non-functional (not required to be due to lower seating capacity). Otherwise, the B737-900 standard and the B737-900ER are identical in appearance.
A final point is regarding the "winglets" (the vertical wing extensions at the wingtips). For our airline, the first version was called a "blended winglet", which was only swept upward. Because it reduces "induced drag" at the wingtips, we realized a 3 - 5% savings in fuel burn over non-winglet equipped aircraft. The next version of winglet (which was installed on our aircraft well in advance of the B737 MAXs first flights by our company) was called a "scimitar winglet", with extensions pointing both up and down at the wingtip. The scimitars were installed on all of our B737NGs due to the additional fuel savings that they offered (another 3 - 6%).
Love your channel! Great content and narration! :)
Good video) Love the 737
Best got better. Both Plane and channel. Thanks.
I like Boeing 737NG.
This video was made on my birthday!
YES !.... for me to POOP on......
[ but the 737-200 does have a gravel kit, and actually works in north Canada ]
Thanks for another interesting video! Looking forward for the video about the MAX family.
Your work is very excellent!
Love the "Boeing 737" but my favorite is the "Boeing 757-300"
Me too with Lufthansa and Retro Southwest
Try the Airbus 350, now thats a Beauty
@@DeltaStar777 Nahh, more like, Boeing 707.
737s are lit!!
Thanks for one more great video on your channel you get a sub
It will be interesting to hear about the Boeing NMA - the new plane after the 737
Flyer Killer NMA is intended to be more of a replacement for the 757 and smaller 767s
@@soravulpis96 the 797 you mean
797 / N.M.A. is more of a 757 replacement than a 737 replacement
10,000 views and 10,000 planes
For real thought this should have way more views
I just found this video. Thanks so much I really love it, 737 is a great airplane and I hope it will make a comeback
0:10 sky: ...the most epic...
With an automatic crash program and an engine so greatly planned it makes the whole plane point upwards, B737Max really the most epic plane ever
@@77l96 yep, I'm stupid, haha, no need for you to point out
@@77l96 and yeah thanks for pointing that out.
Make a big video about the 787)
I like the small plane with the big tail! It sometimes looks too big at certain angles. 😋
Board Computer: Alpha Vane failure, no plausible Data
MCAS: It's PARTY TIME.
Loved the vid! THANK YOU SR!
How do you not have all the subscribers?
TheJohnnyrat well he says he's fighting an infection and he's Russian so give him a break
TheJohnnyrat I could understand him completely
Looking back at this... Boeing screwed over a bit with the MAX update. But the legacy the 737 created still cannot be forgotten, nor ignored. Especially now.
The reason the 737 in known as the barefoot Boeing is that the weight of the wheel doors, would affect performance of the 737. The -500 had the name -2000 in the beginning. Braathens S.A.F.E (BU, 05) was to the lounch costumer for the -500, but Southwest beat them to it. BU asked Boeing if the could make a smaller verson of the -300 as a replacement for the -200. Boeing said yes.
Great informational video
The best is the 747 which started the wide body era
works well with the newer point to point, non hub system where people want to fly from one small city to another, such as Dover DE, to Bremen, or Asheville to Walla Walla.
I know at least one other jet uses the same exposed landing gear. The CRJ has almost exactly the same setup.
It's not the only single isle airliner we have the 707 717 727 and 757
10,000 Stubee's sold, that indicates operators are raking in the cash, using the 737, I'm a 757, 747, 767 Lover, but you can't dismiss the 40+ years of success, the 737 has given Boeing and the carriers. Well done
B-737 IS AND HAS BEEN A "WORK HORSE" AND THE MAX VERSIONS WILL BE ONCE AVIONICS AND TRAINING IS COMPLETED. A VERY INFORMATIVE VIDEO OF THE BOEING 737 FAMILY. THANKS!
favorite plane right here :)
Now the 737-200 was the first plane I ever rode on
I'm eager to see the video about my favorite 777 !
This plane is also the basis for the US Navy's P-8 posiedon maritime patrol plane.
Great videos as always 😊😊😊😊
Yes your right
Excellent and well informed video!
This is such an informative video! +1 like!
Excellent job! Thank you much!
Very good vid mate i like thanks
Don't forget to give credits to Kas van Zonneveld for your initial photo you used... (Transavia at Eelde Airport)
We had In Yugoslavija 737-300,DC-9,and DC- 10.
But Skyships said in the MD-11 video ”But the Balkan wars began and the planes was not deliverd.”
@@greateraviationgl91 We had about 10 dc 10 ,not latest version i guess
amazing video thx
You have great videos!!
Excellent, I enjoyed it
remember that the new models of the 737 are larger than older aircraft Boeing made
I think the 757 is the best Boeing as it’s the most revolutionary Aircraft now as all the airlineswant the 757 in their fleet that’s why the 797 is a 757 Modernised.
Can't wait for the 747. Love your vids. After your done with Boeing, can you do a video on the IL-62?
David Boeing 7X7 The 747 video will be big) After the Boeing marathon I will make some Soviet planes)
Skyships Eng big as in long? I hope! Your videos are very interesting and enjoyable. I'm personally a huge fan of old Soviet aviation so I can't wait. Can I leave a few requests? IL-62, TU-154, TU-114, IL-18, TU-144, TU-134 and YAK-40.
Another great video!. :)
Nice vid!!
Lovely & interesting documentary, I would like to hear it narrated by Johnathan Aris, this one sukxx big time !