Dji sounds deeper (more bassy) but i will not change it for the convinience of how descret is and how compact. You can equalize however you wantvit later. Also the mark 2 somes with reveivers for iphone and android as well as for cameras.
Apples to Bluetooth comparison, Lark is NOT BLUETOOTH. It needs a receiver. DJI is Bluetooth, no receiver necessary. The bulky receiver is a non-starter for anyone who has an action camera that can accept Bluetooth.
Dji sounds deeper (more bassy) but i will not change it for the convinience of how descret is and how compact. You can equalize however you wantvit later. Also the mark 2 somes with reveivers for iphone and android as well as for cameras.
I love the DJI Mic features but my clients LOVE how small the Lark is. We always EQ in post to add more boom. Thanks for your comment!
Love for india
🙏🙏
Apples to Bluetooth comparison, Lark is NOT BLUETOOTH. It needs a receiver. DJI is Bluetooth, no receiver necessary. The bulky receiver is a non-starter for anyone who has an action camera that can accept Bluetooth.
Too late: DJI Mic Mini is just around the corner.
Idk if that exists
DJI sounds muffled. Lark M2 is much better.
Using both mics over time, I see the DJI Mic has more bass to have a more professional boom. The Lark sounds more open for sure