If you would have been on Udemy I would have bought many courses. Now its much more difficult to get what I need. Pls consider it, much larger turnover with lower prices . You are an amazing teacher, especially I am looking for your math and probability courses
I really enjoyed this one! I had heard stories about the telescope that detected the CMBR, but it was cool to see pictures and learn more about it. I also didn't know the expansion of the universe is accelerating, very interesting video, thanks!
Hello math and science, First of all I would like to say that I like your channel because it is fun and clear.I was wondering if you are going to make more videos?
If the expansion began at a point, this point should still be somewhere in our universe, that's the centre. Although, according to your balloon analogy, the centre should be in a higher dimension.
Yes locally things near us can be coming at us, but on larger scales everything we see is moving away. It’s like in a gas balloon. If we inflate the balloon, inside on average the gas molecules are getting farther apart because the balloon is expanding but microscopically they can be coming at each other in small scales and colliding.
Genesis 1:1-5 KJ21 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. [2] And the earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. [3] And God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light. [4] And God saw the light, that it was good; and God divided the light from the darkness. [5] And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. John 1:1-3 KJ21 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. [2] The same was in the beginning with God. [3] All things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made. Grace, Mercy and Peace to you 💜💜💜💜💜
All that you have done is create another "turtle". A turtle to add to those supporting the BB theory. A turtle that asks the question "What created the entity that you call 'God'?".
If we could summarize all about its inflation , deflation and Bigbang theory... Could we then say: the BEGINNING WAS THE END AND THE END IS THE BEGINNING...!!!???!!! Even the creation story talks about it : THE WORD EXISTED BEFORE AND THE WORD EXISTS NOW ( Not the exact quote... from the Bible )...!!! I hope it makes some kind of understanding and connections to what you and other scientists are teaching today...!!! THANK YOU... SIR...!!! Again, you are a GREAT TEACHER...!!!
Difference between the observable universe and the entire universe. The entire universe is about 150 sextillion times larger than the observable universe. Lotsa places to look for center.
I have question: - We always see the source of the light (The place where it is emitted). The source of CMB is 13.7 BY away from us. But... is the source first need 13.7BY to distance from us before sending us the Light (CMB) which need another 13.7BY traveling time to reach us? The necessary time to see the CMB is 27.4 BY. I ask this question in the Astronomical society and offer reward if somebody produce a circular diagram (cut-off projection) of the visible Universe and explain in this diagram where exactly CMB has been emitted, in what direction and how we are able to see it in the center. The Astronomical Society reject my offer and threaten me with suspension of my membership if I continue asking this question. May be you can answer and produce this diagram?
A great vid about science. If we accept Big bang theory in which the universe was born after a massive explosion since then all the matter formed as we know they are all in the periodic table. But as far as I learnt that for every matter was formed, there is associate anti-matter. My question is where are all the anti-matter?
If the universe is in a superposition, then it has no center or edge. No beginning, no ending, the only beginning being a quantum leap out of the universal quantum foam. Everyone subjectively collapsing their own part of the objective nonlocal superposition into their own (eigenvector) local subjective reality without unduly disrupting the greater universal superposition, quantum entangled holographic unreal reality of a super positional universe.
So I understood spacetime proven to be flat. The baloon is curved, explanation makes no sense. We are at the center of the observable universe, unless we move to the edge, then we are once again at the center of the observable. So were always in the center if the universe is infinite. If its not infinite, the at the edge, we are once again in the center of the observable and whatever is on the other side of the edge. The only thing that makes sense is that we are always in the center.
To have the explanation make sense, one must understand that the concepts "flat" & "curved" refer there to DIFFERENT sets of dimensions. WITHIN the plane of that balloon, said surface is BY DEFINITION flat. Only OUTSIDE the balloon, ie in a continuum of at least 1 more dimension, can said surface be curved. I leave to YOU the task of coming up with a REALLY GOOD definition of "flat" that is true WITHIN a set of dimensions. (*MY* off-the-cuff definition is something like "An observer existing IN a set of dimensions observes ONLY the surface of the plane".)
@Scott-i9v2s that still doesn't make sense. If there was an option to be outside of the 3 dimensions, in the 4th, then we would be in the middle of the 4th dimension looking into the third. And what would be the 5th dimension looking into the 4th? The more dimensions, maybe infinite, you look in FROM, the more we are in the center! Your own definition would then make the entire 3 dimensions the center, like the pit of an avocado.
@@dimtgco1428 Try this. Inside OUR 4-dimensional space-time, we can observe all 3 spatial dimensions of a balloon. Observer X in/on the (for US CURVED) surface of said balloon observes 1 dimension less, ie only a plane & whatever is in that (for him FLAT) plane. The ANALOGY is that X can observe the entirety of the plane that he is in/on. Since said plane (being a balloon's surface) has no (for X observable) edge, X can validly say that he is in the center of HIS continuum/universe--wherever he might be. Whether this analogy holds for a dimension-set larger than OUR 4 falls outside the limits of the analogy being used. One COULD indeed extend the analogy outwards (to 5 dimensions). But that NEED NOT automagically imply that Z in Z's 5 dimensions is in the center of Z's continuum/universe. After all, is in OUR space-time the balloon in EXACTLY the-same location as the camera's focal point? Define the precision of "center"...
www.youtube.com/@MathAndScience 1 problem with using the word "create": it suggests that something *came into existence (from nothing)*. In *my* understanding of the Big Bang thing NO need exists for that process; expansion all-by-itself suffices for the BB to "hold water", as it were. This usage *creates* (pun intended!) another problem, namely the question "What *caused* its creation?". Side note: The phrase "hold water" together with the concept "nothing" pops up an image of nothing(ness being a container, in this case of H2O... How many meanings can one extract from "Nothing holds water"???
The big bang is a theory, one that is under question. But you speak like it's fact. I've unsubbed from your channel now that I know you're just a propagator of nonsense.
No. Kamala is the center of attention. Nobody could be more important. If we don't do as she says we are doomed. If we don't agree with her new center policy we are on the out. All because YOU don't like Trump because YOU are unaware that TDS is at the center of your life. Grow the fuk up.
@@laurencemusolino I watch this channel to revive some math of my study in econometrics. However, I found that math is failing on several levels which makes it difficult for people to understand. E.g. I have learned various forms of math and mathematical statistics. The principal thing people don't understand of mathematics is that it is just a set of agreements on how to write things down and that "a solution" is nothing but a different but easier to read way of writing the equations. I wish someone had told me that early on. I only discovered that in my last year when one professor addressed the philosophy of math and the concept of chance.
Best human being in our universe! Mr. Jason!
Oh wow thank you!
Thanks so much, Jason. Yours is by far my favorite channel on YT.
Wow, thanks!
Always a clear teacher - and always gives a new angle on things. Thank you!
Explained better than Niel deGrass Tyson or Dr. Becky and most other astrophysicists.. Thanks for making it more understandable.
Wow thanks so much!!!
twinkle twinkle little star ....professor Jason knows where you are .... Another magnificent presentation!
Awesome thank you!
Thank u sir u are a great teacher. GodBless u
At last..a video about cosmology and the Big Bang theory. I've been waiting for this a long long time... Thank you, Sir!
The legend 🎉🎉🎉
A genuine delight, thanks you for sharing so much for so long. I find myself here so very often.
If you would have been on Udemy I would have bought many courses. Now its much more difficult to get what I need. Pls consider it, much larger turnover with lower prices . You are an amazing teacher, especially I am looking for your math and probability courses
I really enjoyed this one! I had heard stories about the telescope that detected the CMBR, but it was cool to see pictures and learn more about it. I also didn't know the expansion of the universe is accelerating, very interesting video, thanks!
Thanks for making such a informational video, love from india
Incredible explanation using math and physics to explain about the origin of the universe. ❤
Well done. An excellent presentation.
Thank you kindly!
Hello math and science,
First of all I would like to say that I like your channel because it is fun and clear.I was wondering if you are going to make more videos?
Yes for sure!
Einstein theories run a lot deeper than most realize.
If the expansion began at a point, this point should still be somewhere in our universe, that's the centre. Although, according to your balloon analogy, the centre should be in a higher dimension.
What about Andromeda Galaxy? It surely is moving towards us
Yes locally things near us can be coming at us, but on larger scales everything we see is moving away. It’s like in a gas balloon. If we inflate the balloon, inside on average the gas molecules are getting farther apart because the balloon is expanding but microscopically they can be coming at each other in small scales and colliding.
My wife says she is the centre of the universe - if not I get shouted at.
Genesis 1:1-5 KJ21
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. [2] And the earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. [3] And God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light. [4] And God saw the light, that it was good; and God divided the light from the darkness. [5] And God called the light Day, and the darkness He called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
John 1:1-3 KJ21
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. [2] The same was in the beginning with God. [3] All things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made.
Grace, Mercy and Peace to you 💜💜💜💜💜
All that you have done is create another "turtle". A turtle to add to those supporting the BB theory. A turtle that asks the question "What created the entity that you call 'God'?".
...and that was 6000 years ago ;-)
@@Sam-wu5mq Serious question: What is the source of that "6000 years ago"? I mean, *WHEN* was it first mentioned?
@@Scott-i9v2s Just a simple MATH, based on the Jewish Bible chronicle and Calendar calculations.
@@Sam-wu5mq So... 6K years TODAY?
If we could summarize all about its inflation , deflation and Bigbang theory... Could we then say: the BEGINNING WAS THE END AND THE END IS THE BEGINNING...!!!???!!!
Even the creation story talks about it : THE WORD EXISTED BEFORE AND THE WORD EXISTS NOW ( Not the exact quote... from the Bible )...!!!
I hope it makes some kind of understanding and connections to what you and other scientists are teaching today...!!!
THANK YOU... SIR...!!!
Again, you are a GREAT TEACHER...!!!
Where can I get a math and science t-shirt? I would like to represent 😊
I need to make some. Thank you!
i want to buy a dozen as well.
The center of the universe is just like the center of the surface of an expanding sphere.
Please note that ON SAID SURFACE the value of pi can equal 2.
I am the very centre of mi universe!
This suggests multiple dimensions, and laws of physics not yet discovered. My mind hurts trying to wrap it around this concept.
Difference between the observable universe and the entire universe.
The entire universe is about 150 sextillion times larger than the observable universe. Lotsa places to look for center.
Great explanation. Now on to Black Holes?
I have question: - We always see the source of the light (The place where it is emitted). The source of CMB is 13.7 BY away from us. But... is the source first need 13.7BY to distance from us before sending us the Light (CMB) which need another 13.7BY traveling time to reach us? The necessary time to see the CMB is 27.4 BY. I ask this question in the Astronomical society and offer reward if somebody produce a circular diagram (cut-off projection) of the visible Universe and explain in this diagram where exactly CMB has been emitted, in what direction and how we are able to see it in the center. The Astronomical Society reject my offer and threaten me with suspension of my membership if I continue asking this question. May be you can answer and produce this diagram?
A great vid about science. If we accept Big bang theory in which the universe was born after a massive explosion since then all the matter formed as we know they are all in the periodic table. But as far as I learnt that for every matter was formed, there is associate anti-matter. My question is where are all the anti-matter?
It’s a mystery. It there must have been a little more matter in the beginning.
And it did not come from the pigeons. Thankfully.
I did learn something too.
🤔... 👍
So what is the shape of the universe, and where are we in that shape?
If the universe is in a superposition, then it has no center or edge. No beginning, no ending, the only beginning being a quantum leap out of the universal quantum foam. Everyone subjectively collapsing their own part of the objective nonlocal superposition into their own (eigenvector) local subjective reality without unduly disrupting the greater universal superposition, quantum entangled holographic unreal reality of a super positional universe.
Wouldn't agree with last statement. Time has no beginning or end, universe is infinite.
Made pigeons homeless for no reason whatsoever. Poor pigeons.
Well explained.
So I understood spacetime proven to be flat. The baloon is curved, explanation makes no sense. We are at the center of the observable universe, unless we move to the edge, then we are once again at the center of the observable. So were always in the center if the universe is infinite. If its not infinite, the at the edge, we are once again in the center of the observable and whatever is on the other side of the edge. The only thing that makes sense is that we are always in the center.
To have the explanation make sense, one must understand that the concepts "flat" & "curved" refer there to DIFFERENT sets of dimensions. WITHIN the plane of that balloon, said surface is BY DEFINITION flat. Only OUTSIDE the balloon, ie in a continuum of at least 1 more dimension, can said surface be curved.
I leave to YOU the task of coming up with a REALLY GOOD definition of "flat" that is true WITHIN a set of dimensions. (*MY* off-the-cuff definition is something like "An observer existing IN a set of dimensions observes ONLY the surface of the plane".)
@Scott-i9v2s that still doesn't make sense. If there was an option to be outside of the 3 dimensions, in the 4th, then we would be in the middle of the 4th dimension looking into the third. And what would be the 5th dimension looking into the 4th? The more dimensions, maybe infinite, you look in FROM, the more we are in the center! Your own definition would then make the entire 3 dimensions the center, like the pit of an avocado.
@@dimtgco1428 Try this. Inside OUR 4-dimensional space-time, we can observe all 3 spatial dimensions of a balloon. Observer X in/on the (for US CURVED) surface of said balloon observes 1 dimension less, ie only a plane & whatever is in that (for him FLAT) plane. The ANALOGY is that X can observe the entirety of the plane that he is in/on. Since said plane (being a balloon's surface) has no (for X observable) edge, X can validly say that he is in the center of HIS continuum/universe--wherever he might be.
Whether this analogy holds for a dimension-set larger than OUR 4 falls outside the limits of the analogy being used. One COULD indeed extend the analogy outwards (to 5 dimensions). But that NEED NOT automagically imply that Z in Z's 5 dimensions is in the center of Z's continuum/universe. After all, is in OUR space-time the balloon in EXACTLY the-same location as the camera's focal point? Define the precision of "center"...
North of the North Pole is the Pole star (more or less). Or, at least above the North Pole.
The Federal Government ought to have a Black Project to clone Jason and have those clones distributed throughout every single Institution of learning.
www.youtube.com/@MathAndScience 1 problem with using the word "create": it suggests that something *came into existence (from nothing)*. In *my* understanding of the Big Bang thing NO need exists for that process; expansion all-by-itself suffices for the BB to "hold water", as it were. This usage *creates* (pun intended!) another problem, namely the question "What *caused* its creation?".
Side note: The phrase "hold water" together with the concept "nothing" pops up an image of nothing(ness being a container, in this case of H2O... How many meanings can one extract from "Nothing holds water"???
Theres no center of the explosion caue God spoke it
The big bang is a theory, one that is under question. But you speak like it's fact. I've unsubbed from your channel now that I know you're just a propagator of nonsense.
A lot of people think THEY are the center of the universe. E.g. Donald Trump is convinced he is, for one. Bob Dylan said his father thought so, too.
No. Kamala is the center of attention. Nobody could be more important. If we don't do as she says we are doomed. If we don't agree with her new center policy we are on the out. All because YOU don't like Trump because YOU are unaware that TDS is at the center of your life. Grow the fuk up.
This is an educational channel, not a political channel. There are many left-wing channels that are more suitable domains for this kind of discussion.
@@laurencemusolino I watch this channel to revive some math of my study in econometrics. However, I found that math is failing on several levels which makes it difficult for people to understand. E.g. I have learned various forms of math and mathematical statistics. The principal thing people don't understand of mathematics is that it is just a set of agreements on how to write things down and that "a solution" is nothing but a different but easier to read way of writing the equations. I wish someone had told me that early on. I only discovered that in my last year when one professor addressed the philosophy of math and the concept of chance.
@charlesvanderhoog7056 That's true, and it is definitely helpful in perceiving equations.
@@laurencemusolino Thanks. Keep up your good work. I love it.
Holly quran talk about this you know