One of the reasons Buzz is one of my favorites is the following incident. Some years ago Buzz was being hounded by the kind of "we never landed on the moon" idiots that are commenting here. One of them was yelling at him as Buzz crossed a street. Buzz stopped and clocked the idiot with a left hook. At the time Buzz was 80 years old
How did they get back ? Have u seen the amount of energy it took to 'get there' they couldn't possibly carry that amount of energy. Also the fuel tank is bigger than the rocket and detaches itself in space. Did they put extra fuel up there first and a team to attach it all or did the actual rocket just glide back without deviating ???????
@@tonyswann5289 What an absolute moron you are. What had to get to the moon was the complete Apollo spacecraft including the fuel to land the LEM on the lunar surface. And all of this had to escape Earth's gravity. All that had to get back to Earth was the Apollo command and service modules without any fuel.
@@donb1183 ok Mr NASA expert be nice to people and don't call them morons. Santa Claus will bring you a lovely present. Say hi to the fairies that play at the bottom of your garden. 🤪
Absolutely, Some of people who knock buzz ,calling him a lair etc etc, especially on here, if they live long enough to reach their 90's they'll be lucky if they remember to unzip their trousers before they take a piss !🤣 , Buzz is a legend and lived a life they wouldn't even be able dream of.
Thank you, Buzz, for being so brave that you travelled to the moon. Your footprints are still there today because, without an atmosphere, the moon has no breeze to blow those footprints away. You and the other astronauts were the ultimate explorers. And thank you, JFK, for funding that extraordinary mission.
Its like "How the heck do I top that "? .. sort of thing. I watched a great documentary on all the moon missions a few years ago, one of the astronauts from a later mission told a story that he had recently been looking at the moon with his granddaughter, suddenly, tears started pouring from his eyes and down his cheeks, when his young granddaughter asked him why he was crying, he said he couldn't tell her because he didn't really know why himself, he said he was just engulfed by a sudden wave of emotion. So he told her it was just the evening dust in his eyes. That was so poignant I've never forgot it, and in a bizarre way I think it explains it all really.
They did . Actually three bozos of them :-) . Watch the very first post Apollo 11 conference . The three of those bozos looked like just got back from the funeral not from the Moon . Best when they couldn't answer simple question if they see the stars or not from the Moon . Hahaha LOL 🤪😜😂🤣🤑😝
The guy went in high-orbit, NOT the Moon. a) Why never any pictures of stars ? Because they factually indicate your exact and true location better than a GPS ? b) How did they reconnect the moon module to the spaceship manually, when Elon musk has trouble with it using *modern* AI ? Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmh.. 🤫🤔🤔
@@goofygrandlouis6296 a) exposure. if they turned the exposure bright enough to see the stars then the surface would be blindingly bright. in fact (i havent tested it but it should work) if you download one of the apollo pictures from the surface of the moon and turn up the exposure bright enough, you should be able to see the stars. b) spacex is a private company which started a lot later than nasa, which is a government agency. also spacex literally is great at docking with other spacecrafts so idk what you're talking about. even nasa said that the hardest part of the apollo missions was docking the spacecrafts. never did research? 🤫🤔🤔
@@elitecereal Your point a) would be worth trying, if it is REALLY possible to do. Stars don't lie. It would determine if they went only in high-orbit or on the Moon. b) SpaceX has modern AI assisting the docking.. while 1960's NASA had a joystick and some dude. 😉
@@goofygrandlouis6296 a) just did it and I could in fact see stars, though not in the best quality. if you're lucky enough you could even see the milky way background if one of the photos were taken from the right angle. b) there wasn't just a joystick and a dude. why don't you try docking two heavy spacecrafts orbiting the moon with a joystick? yeah you can't. there were tens and if not hundreds of guys with many different buttons involved in the docking. 😉
This is so fucking crazy...Imagine being one of the only people in humanity to step foot and the moon and you can't remember half the shit, and half the people say they did/didn't see stars in the sky...WTF If I went to the moon I would be so ecstatic making it home alive and being able to tell the story
What did he mean at the end of this clip when he mentioned, "only those who have actually landed on the moon would wear those boots. But, no." Someone elaborate please
At 2:25 he points to his lapel pin for a second time which is based on his boot print photo. He had no idea how popular those pins would become. He says “it could have been that only those people who had (didn’t?) walked on the moon would wear these but no.” They became fashionable. He is also searching for the right words so some are repeated or rephrased mid sentence which is a little confusing.
like a special club who gets to wear the pin. They didnt limit the pins like he thought maybe the should have.
6 лет назад+1
When he's talking about the footprints, the soft sand etc, well how come there's no disturbed dust under the lander, where the huge rocket motor would have been thrusting down wards, to slow the vehicle down? And when it landed, not a grain of sand on the 'feet', not one...
Because it was blown out laterally well away from the lander due to a wider than normal rocket plume which is caused by the lack of an atmosphere and no air resistance. Simple. And you can see the radial movement of the lunar material in ALL of the landing videos. Watch it get blown out to the sides. This is from apollo 15, no billowing, no resistance, no dust floating around. It settles pretty quickly. ruclips.net/video/XvKg68DcTZA/видео.htmlm28s
6 лет назад
Absolute bollocks. total lies from a know nothing shill,.Even those piss tank Buzzy has now admitted there were no moon landings, you still dribble that there were. And I have never seen or heard such a fucking stupid impossible made up explanation as what you just farted out..better go and change your underpanties..
Hahahaha! Your regurgitated "buzz confession" is as usual, a cherry-picked and selectively edited clip from an interview with a 6 year old that took place almost 4 years ago, and you fools are just now jumping on the bandwagon? Hahahahahaha! Fool, try watching the entire interview instead of picking one small part of it. You conspiratards are hypocrites!
Bahahahaha! Again, a hypocrite. Ok, so let me get this straight. According to you fuckwitt conspiratards, NASA LIES, NASA CAN'T BE TRUSTED, and so forth, but today you believe Nasa, Trust Nasa, becaues 'NASA SAID' right? Bahahahahaha!!!! So I show you a photo of the earth, and you cry FAKE and dismiss it because NASA LIES, AND NASA CAN'T BE TRUSTED, yet here you are with your hypocritical stupidity disproving NASA with data provided by NASA while screaming to never trust NASA.. Bahahahahaha! Hypocrite!
At NASA, engineers, scientists, technicians and other staff are employed from numerous countries. Do you mean to say they all lie? If that's what you mean to say, then I'm sorry, that's a pathetic try at conspiracy. Try harder. Good luck.
*CONCERNING THE ‘PRESTIGIOUS UNIVERSITY OF YOU-TUBE* It is to be noted that there are many ‘learned intellectuals’ here who have done ‘in-depth research’ in ‘Special Alternative Reality at the U of UT. Having completed extensive ‘studies’ and ‘research’ at this place of ‘learning excellence’, they now consider themselves in the unique position of being able to enlighten the rest of us with their ‘profound’ in-depth knowledge of topics such as Space Exploration ect. I hear there are three con men Lecturers in residence there. (oops, I mean ‘learned gentlemen) They are ‘Professors’ Bart Sibrel, Emeritus ‘Bill’ Kaysing, and Massimo Mazzucco ( Department of Misinformation & Nincompoopery) One could imagine that they have gained diplomas resulting in such extensive studies and research. Sadly for them, if such diplomas actually existed, as in being printed out, they’d not be worth the paper they’ve been printed on. I suppose they could be utilized as arse wipe but a sewer blockage would then be a problem.
i just thought about this; what these guys saw and all the apollo astronauts saw with their eyes is not the moon in the video we see...what they saw will be the moon that possibly the visuals of artemis mission would show us hopefully.
He forgot to mention the surface of petrified wood - like the moon rock they gave the Dutch government as an international gesture. 2009 lab review said it was wood. Still no comment from Nasa
Commercial Art Services Your conspiratard regurgitated 'petrified wood' story is total bullshit. There is no need for NASA to comment on a bullshit story that was laid to rest long ago. Only fools like you keep regurgitating it. The Dutch moon rocks are right where they have always been. In a museum. CASE CLOSED. ruclips.net/video/xNMnPkQZNjk/видео.html
This petrified wood story is another piece of misinformation. Some Dutch diplomat had a ordinary rock that was given to him by an American diplomat who came from Arizona. At the end of his life the Dutch diplomat became confused and though it might be a moon rock. The Apollo 11 astronauts had visited the Netherlands on a goodwill tour so the diplomat assumed that was how he had gotten the object. After he died his estate gave it to a Dutch museum, which made the mistake of putting it on display without verifying its authenticity first. After 10 years it was examined and found to be petrified wood. NASA had absolutely nothing to do with the object. You can blame the Dutch museum for not having it verified before putting it on display. Any actual Apollo samples that have been examined by geologists have always been found to be real lunar material.
We know he went to the moon because there is a mountain of evidence that proves this beyond doubt. There are people who'll believe anything, as demonstrated by moon landing deniers.
He even said in an interview, when asked by a 8 year old girl "why we didn't go to the moon in such a long time", that we did never go in the first place. "We didn't go there" - Buzz Aldrin
I went to the moon straight after Mars. I was in a Nissan micra. An e reg silver micra that belonged to my mum. Honestly honestly I did just like buzz did 🤦🏻 🤦♀️. Does anyone know nasa has ‘lost all original footage’ check it out. All my footage was in the boot of the Nissan micra and unfortunately it got weighed in as scrap a few years ago
Forget the Stars, Moon Dust, Light Angles all you have to do is Watch the Apollo 11 out brief's , 1st they have a Teleprompter to assist with what they say, and all 3 look as if they are attending A Funeral why such odd behaviors???? as a 20 year US Navy Veteran, I have attended hundreds of in and out Briefs and Never. Ever have I witnessed such ODD behaviors, Something Stinks,,, so the question is Why, if you went ,,,,, Why no interviews, ????Why Did you Re sign, after the 1st flight??? On 19 & 20 July 1967 Buzz, Neil & Michael are in low earth orbit putting filters on the windows of the Space craft in an attempt to fool the World ??? Why Fake how far you are??? In that Clip you have A GMT time Stamp thus making the time 100%%%Accurate if you landed on the 20th of July, how are you in low Earth Orbit on 19&20 July ???? 250miles above Earth using Fakery?????THE moon is 238,000 miles from Earth, ,you asked you all 3 get mad? Why ?? Even going as far as to hit a reporter on live TV???? Why on that same flight do you have a second Ear piece feeding the CIA into NASA feed???? WHY???? Again something Stinks???
Look at their first press conference after they came back from the Moon somehow they don't look proud of what they did think, concentrate understand you have been manipulated
I've looked at all the skeptics claims. All are flimsy and easily explained. Knowing the culture and collective mindset and determination to fulfill this incredible goal by these guys.. I'm 100% sure it happened. I do believe many conspiracies, but not this odd one.
Or maybe he is telling the truth and you just don't like it. You would rather believe the absolute crap you see by binge-watching anomous armchair conspiratard youtube videos.
@@Level_No_Curve As evidence for the moon landings, we have 382 kg of moon rock, hours of live TV, hours of film, thousands of photos, stacks of measurements and scientific results, eyewitness accounts, and photos of the landing sites made by later lunar orbiters. Detailed analysis of the physics and engineering required shows that it is possible to land on the moon with 1960s technology. Despite 50 years of trying, no moon landing denier has ever produced convincing evidence of his claims. This includes "Deathbed confessions" made by actors instead of the people they are claiming to portray.
@@Level_No_Curve The "petrified wood" story is bullshit. In 2006, a Dutch museum hosted an art exhibit that showcased forgeries. One of the exhibits, claiming to be a moon rock, ended up in the museum's collection afterwards; its paperwork was lost. In 2009, this was examined and found to be wood. NASA keeps extensive records on its lunar samples. Two samples were supplied to the Netherlands, the petrified wood sample is not one of them. So this is the level of "information" you base your opinion on.
He is a liar !! Who was filming the take off, would you really jump around on a planet surface if you had never been there ?hell no, you would be scared to death ! Notice, he never described anything about the surface
@@mab3465 You should really do yourself a big favor and go read up on the subject properly instead of coming here publicly displaying your lack of knowledge concerning the SIX Apollo Moon Landings. And by that, I don't mean watching idiotic Utube 'fake moon landing' videos either. Modern History is what it is.NOT what you think or wish it to be. And the Apollo Moon Landings are an astonishing series of events in that history. Do an honest read-up on the subject. You know, get educated and enlightened.
Buzz do you ever wonder why you keep playing this game. Has your whole life been a vain show? What a disrespect to your own soul. I can't really wrap my head around it all.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 what about never leaving low earth orbit don't you understand. He's telling you stories. Made up storied. We've not been through the Van Allen belt. Look it up. Do you research please and change you hostile mean spirited attitude.
@@hannahzucker Your comment seems to indicate that you subscribe to the flat earth and magical dome ideas. As to the Van Allen radiation belts, here's what Van Allen himself has to say about them. QUOTE: "The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. -- James A. Van Allen" END QUOTE So, why do you think you understand more about the Van Allen belts than James Van Allen?
@@hannahzucker Do your research!!!” The common statement of the Hoaxtard and Flattard. Here’s the thing. Research is a learned skill; it is hard, it is nuanced and complex, and it is true that the majority of people would not even know where to begin or even HOW to do [their own research. Research is NOT: Googling, scrolling your FB news-feed, or watching RUclips or 4Chan to search for the results you are hoping to find to be “true.” These are called confirmation biases, and are quickly and easily ruled out when doing actual research.
@@hannahzucker Continuing. You didn’t research anything and it is highly probable you don’t know how to do so. Did you compile a literature review and write abstracts on each article? Or better yet, did you collect a random sample of sources and perform independent probability statistics on the reported results? No? Did you at least take each article one by one and look into the source (that would be the author, publisher and funder), then critique the writing for logical fallacies, cognitive distortions and plain inaccuracies? Did you ask yourself why this source might publish these particular results? Did you follow the trail of references and apply the same source of scrutiny to them? No? Then you didn’t…research anything. You read or watched a video, most likely with little or no objectivity. You came across something in your algorithm manipulated feed, something that jived with your implicit biases and served your confirmation bias, and subconsciously applied your emotional filters and called it proof.” This doesn’t even go into institutional review boards (IRB’s), also known as independent ethics committees, ethical review boards, or touch on peer review, or meta-analyses.
People don't realise that the government might have threatened his and the other astronauts families if they didn't stick with NASA's story. Imagine living in fear like that. Imagine if we were in their shoes, what would you do? I feel so sorry for all of them.
A lot of born yesterday fresh off the tit conspiratards here. Self-proclaimed shrinks weighing in with unearned hubris about their batshit nuts ideas and analysis of Aldrin. He is famous, they are not, and never will be. Flattards and conspiratards can only argue from ignorance to justify their arguments from incredulity.
Load of crap. How can you leave an impression in the fine Regolith (moon dust). There is nothing of substance in its makeup to hold any sort of imprint. No moisture.
Tony Elsom Another super intellectual comment from someone who keeps his head in the sand. You guys certainly know how to debate. Explain how Regolith holds an imprint, surely not too difficult for you moon buddies.
@@MrBarrynicholas Lunar regolith actually holds imprints indefinitely, I would like to take you there and press your face in it, stuff the flagpole still lying around up your ass and sing the American national anthem while saluting the earth rising....check wikipedia for fuck sake.also:www.space.com/14740-footprints-moon.html
Buzz is just describing what it's like being drunk and trying to pass it off as walking on the moon.. That's why he believes that he actually went to the moon. Why do you think they call him Buzz..I will say this, he is a likable character..
+oceana forrest are u saying he isn’t a 33rd degree master mason and are you denying pike’s teachings? Please; elaborate since you seem to understand freemasonry.
Buzz undermines all the creditable things Armstrong says. Even Armstrong recounted in 1970 that the lunar surface was only grey in appearance when the sun was at certain angles. That A12 astronauts also saw the brownish surface of the moon. That glare prevented them from seeing the sun or stars. Then you listen to Buzz and its like "Uhmm... *grimace* erhh... well..." like was he high when he went to the moon? haha
@@ticonderoga7764 I can be open minded enough to admit that it's totally possible for the moon landing to have happened. But, I cannot get over the fact that even today we can't pass the radiation belts. Had they done so, I doubt he'd be in such good health as we see here.
skyhook photography To you Buzz Aldrin, may seem kind of tipsy in a certain way, but I sure hope that you look just as good as he does when you reach almost 90 years old. Lol!
To see an unjust you have to look for it. Now what gives away lies the best ? Body language ! I challenge any sane minding person to view the "Ground Sero" press conference and then say "there was nothing dodgy about that". It's (so)obviously a scripted monitored controlled "offering". There's no emotion in those fellas reactions to anything acting petrified (no pun😂) to say the wrong thing and they find it impossible to answer a question on their own without clarification from the other two first. That and that "press show" alone proves that all is not above board with the moon landing claims.
The moon landings are not a 'claim', they are FACT. All of you self-proclaimed conspiratard shrinks should stick to your day jobs at wall-mart. You are as bad as all of the couch potato general managers and coaches in the NFL.
Well that is what I Say! REMARKABLE! Super duper dry dry and dry dust in dry atmosphere allowing 100% Perfect deep sole prints, even while walking. 😲 (apparently that was impossible, proof 2001 was fake.... had to funny; skip, hop, bounce, kangaroo, to move around)😉
Think about what comes to mind to this man when he looks up in a full moon night
Imagine his dreams
Imagine the fakery
That he speaked not the truth ?
@@Level_No_Curve funny guy
@@TheCollector121 that he walked on it
One of the reasons Buzz is one of my favorites is the following incident. Some years ago Buzz was being hounded by the kind of "we never landed on the moon" idiots that are commenting here. One of them was yelling at him as Buzz crossed a street. Buzz stopped and clocked the idiot with a left hook. At the time Buzz was 80 years old
Imagine being Buzz and hearing those conspiracy idiots while you literally walked there
@thePiercingTruth people are gullable
How did they get back ? Have u seen the amount of energy it took to 'get there' they couldn't possibly carry that amount of energy. Also the fuel tank is bigger than the rocket and detaches itself in space. Did they put extra fuel up there first and a team to attach it all or did the actual rocket just glide back without deviating ???????
@@tonyswann5289 What an absolute moron you are. What had to get to the moon was the complete Apollo spacecraft including the fuel to land the LEM on the lunar surface. And all of this had to escape Earth's gravity. All that had to get back to Earth was the Apollo command and service modules without any fuel.
@@donb1183 ok Mr NASA expert be nice to people and don't call them morons. Santa Claus will bring you a lovely present. Say hi to the fairies that play at the bottom of your garden. 🤪
Buzz, you Sir you and Neil and Mike will always be my heroes.
Buzz is a treasure. He speaks like any 92 year old, but with a high IQ that is apparently hard for some to understand
Absolutely, Some of people who knock buzz ,calling him a lair etc etc, especially on here, if they live long enough to reach their 90's they'll be lucky if they remember to unzip their trousers before they take a piss !🤣 , Buzz is a legend and lived a life they wouldn't even be able dream of.
@@coldeb8911 moon landing is fake dummy. Proof is all over the place. Don't star laughing at me like a dummy.
It's a good job Buzz was an astronaut and not a story teller. I didn't really have a clue what he was talking about.
You’ve hit the nail on the head there.
@Brian P i wonder y🤔🤭
I liked him as an astronaut and I liked him in Toy Story but he speaks like a drunk. I wouldn't say it if not because he has passed now.
I’m sorry you been on the moon?
That's fine. Neither did he.
Thank you, Buzz, for being so brave that you travelled to the moon. Your footprints are still there today because, without an atmosphere, the moon has no breeze to blow those footprints away. You and the other astronauts were the ultimate explorers. And thank you, JFK, for funding that extraordinary mission.
@Derek Gamer Good point, Derek. However, we still have the film of that amazing voyage, and we still know how brave Buzz and the others were.
uh
The astronauts and cosmonauts were very special men who had the right combination of bravery and intelligence.
lol
You get the truth from buzz nothing added nothing exaggerated. Great man we should treasure all he says
Very unique guy
I think he is still confused if he saw the stars from the Moon or not . The other two bozos were confused too . Hahaha
They all went a little off the rails after walking on the moon, how could you not? Dr. Aldrin is a brave man…..god speed sir!……
Its like "How the heck do I top that "? .. sort of thing. I watched a great documentary on all the moon missions a few years ago, one of the astronauts from a later mission told a story that he had recently been looking at the moon with his granddaughter, suddenly, tears started pouring from his eyes and down his cheeks, when his young granddaughter asked him why he was crying, he said he couldn't tell her because he didn't really know why himself, he said he was just engulfed by a sudden wave of emotion. So he told her it was just the evening dust in his eyes. That was so poignant I've never forgot it, and in a bizarre way I think it explains it all really.
@@coldeb8911 …it was the ultimate high tech camping trip………
@@ltv..123 Absolutely!
lol
LOL Off the rails alright ,, They had to keep their mouths shut ! ,,
A moon walking pin? That's a good idea.
This is the very definition of a mean old man.Something that we should all aspire to be.
Mean old man?
They should have interviewed him when he was younger
They did . Actually three bozos of them :-) . Watch the very first post Apollo 11 conference . The three of those bozos looked like just got back from the funeral not from the Moon . Best when they couldn't answer simple question if they see the stars or not from the Moon . Hahaha LOL 🤪😜😂🤣🤑😝
He reminds of me of johnny depp telling his story like that.
Exactly! Rango. HAHAHAHA
I'm glad he's lived to tell the tales. What a brave man
Fairy tales yeah
The guy went in high-orbit, NOT the Moon.
a) Why never any pictures of stars ? Because they factually indicate your exact and true location better than a GPS ?
b) How did they reconnect the moon module to the spaceship manually, when Elon musk has trouble with it using *modern* AI ?
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmh.. 🤫🤔🤔
@@goofygrandlouis6296 a) exposure. if they turned the exposure bright enough to see the stars then the surface would be blindingly bright. in fact (i havent tested it but it should work) if you download one of the apollo pictures from the surface of the moon and turn up the exposure bright enough, you should be able to see the stars.
b) spacex is a private company which started a lot later than nasa, which is a government agency. also spacex literally is great at docking with other spacecrafts so idk what you're talking about. even nasa said that the hardest part of the apollo missions was docking the spacecrafts.
never did research? 🤫🤔🤔
@@elitecereal Your point a) would be worth trying, if it is REALLY possible to do. Stars don't lie. It would determine if they went only in high-orbit or on the Moon.
b) SpaceX has modern AI assisting the docking.. while 1960's NASA had a joystick and some dude. 😉
@@goofygrandlouis6296 a) just did it and I could in fact see stars, though not in the best quality. if you're lucky enough you could even see the milky way background if one of the photos were taken from the right angle.
b) there wasn't just a joystick and a dude. why don't you try docking two heavy spacecrafts orbiting the moon with a joystick? yeah you can't. there were tens and if not hundreds of guys with many different buttons involved in the docking. 😉
My school is named after buzz aldrin ❤
This is so fucking crazy...Imagine being one of the only people in humanity to step foot and the moon and you can't remember half the shit, and half the people say they did/didn't see stars in the sky...WTF If I went to the moon I would be so ecstatic making it home alive and being able to tell the story
How did he photograph the ground with a camera mounted to his chest ? Push up position one handed I suppose
The camera could be removed from the chest and held in the astronaut's hand using a handle that stuck out from the bottom of the camera.
one armed press up would be easy in the moons gravity
Selfie stick. Duhh
He's an American hero
The moons surface is like a moon landing skeptics brain , not alot going on , barren, empty and lonely.
But different because the moon's surface is interesting and has a lot to teach us about the universe.
What did he mean at the end of this clip when he mentioned, "only those who have actually landed on the moon would wear those boots. But, no." Someone elaborate please
At 2:25 he points to his lapel pin for a second time which is based on his boot print photo. He had no idea how popular those pins would become. He says “it could have been that only those people who had (didn’t?) walked on the moon would wear these but no.” They became fashionable. He is also searching for the right words so some are repeated or rephrased mid sentence which is a little confusing.
like a special club who gets to wear the pin. They didnt limit the pins like he thought maybe the should have.
When he's talking about the footprints, the soft sand etc, well how come there's no disturbed dust under the lander, where the huge rocket motor would have been thrusting down wards, to slow the vehicle down? And when it landed, not a grain of sand on the 'feet', not one...
Because it was blown out laterally well away from the lander due to a wider than normal rocket plume which is caused by the lack of an atmosphere and no air resistance. Simple. And you can see the radial movement of the lunar material in ALL of the landing videos. Watch it get blown out to the sides. This is from apollo 15, no billowing, no resistance, no dust floating around. It settles pretty quickly. ruclips.net/video/XvKg68DcTZA/видео.htmlm28s
Absolute bollocks. total lies from a know nothing shill,.Even those piss tank Buzzy has now admitted there were no moon landings, you still dribble that there were. And I have never seen or heard such a fucking stupid impossible made up explanation as what you just farted out..better go and change your underpanties..
Hahahaha! Your regurgitated "buzz confession" is as usual, a cherry-picked and selectively edited clip from an interview with a 6 year old that took place almost 4 years ago, and you fools are just now jumping on the bandwagon? Hahahahahaha! Fool, try watching the entire interview instead of picking one small part of it. You conspiratards are hypocrites!
Bahahahaha! Again, a hypocrite. Ok, so let me get this straight. According to you fuckwitt conspiratards, NASA LIES, NASA CAN'T BE TRUSTED, and so forth, but today you believe Nasa, Trust Nasa, becaues 'NASA SAID' right? Bahahahahaha!!!! So I show you a photo of the earth, and you cry FAKE and dismiss it because NASA LIES, AND NASA CAN'T BE TRUSTED, yet here you are with your hypocritical stupidity disproving NASA with data provided by NASA while screaming to never trust NASA.. Bahahahahaha! Hypocrite!
At NASA, engineers, scientists, technicians and other staff are employed from numerous countries. Do you mean to say they all lie? If that's what you mean to say, then I'm sorry, that's a pathetic try at conspiracy. Try harder. Good luck.
*CONCERNING THE ‘PRESTIGIOUS UNIVERSITY OF YOU-TUBE*
It is to be noted that there are many ‘learned intellectuals’ here who have done ‘in-depth research’ in ‘Special Alternative Reality at the U of UT. Having completed extensive ‘studies’ and ‘research’ at this place of ‘learning excellence’, they now consider themselves in the unique position of being able to enlighten the rest of us with their ‘profound’ in-depth knowledge of topics such as Space Exploration ect. I hear there are three con men Lecturers in residence there. (oops, I mean ‘learned gentlemen) They are ‘Professors’ Bart Sibrel, Emeritus ‘Bill’ Kaysing, and Massimo Mazzucco ( Department of Misinformation & Nincompoopery)
One could imagine that they have gained diplomas resulting in such extensive studies and research. Sadly for them, if such diplomas actually existed, as in being printed out, they’d not be worth the paper they’ve been printed on. I suppose they could be utilized as arse wipe but a sewer blockage would then be a problem.
i just thought about this; what these guys saw and all the apollo astronauts saw with their eyes is not the moon in the video we see...what they saw will be the moon that possibly the visuals of artemis mission would show us hopefully.
@nicksterj it would be cool... I just hope to see the best view possible.. Would be great.
He forgot to mention the surface of petrified wood - like the moon rock they gave the Dutch government as an international gesture. 2009 lab review said it was wood. Still no comment from Nasa
Commercial Art Services Your conspiratard regurgitated 'petrified wood' story is total bullshit. There is no need for NASA to comment on a bullshit story that was laid to rest long ago. Only fools like you keep regurgitating it. The Dutch moon rocks are right where they have always been. In a museum. CASE CLOSED. ruclips.net/video/xNMnPkQZNjk/видео.html
This petrified wood story is another piece of misinformation. Some Dutch diplomat had a ordinary rock that was given to him by an American diplomat who came from Arizona. At the end of his life the Dutch diplomat became confused and though it might be a moon rock. The Apollo 11 astronauts had visited the Netherlands on a goodwill tour so the diplomat assumed that was how he had gotten the object. After he died his estate gave it to a Dutch museum, which made the mistake of putting it on display without verifying its authenticity first. After 10 years it was examined and found to be petrified wood. NASA had absolutely nothing to do with the object. You can blame the Dutch museum for not having it verified before putting it on display. Any actual Apollo samples that have been examined by geologists have always been found to be real lunar material.
@@joevignolor4u949 Nice fairy tale storey . LOL
NASA didn't comment on my latest bowel movement. Did that not exist too? Then you can't site it as evidence.
That had nothing whatsoever to do with NASA. Take care.
I agree with this guy .. . BUZZ ,, LOL after a few drinks .. even I believe I landed on the Moon
Have another martini pops & get your story straight…😂
A spiteful vindictive comment. The mark of a troll. 😎
KIRK DOUGLAS. A.k.a buzz Aldrin.
LMAO- good one.....
I love drunk actors
Shut up
@@justinratcliffe947 oh, I'm sorry. He is not drunk or an actor ?
oh? You live in Hollywood?
Do people still think this guy went to the moon? Christ, people will believe anything!
We know he went to the moon because there is a mountain of evidence that proves this beyond doubt. There are people who'll believe anything, as demonstrated by moon landing deniers.
Then where did he go?
Not so much why the mountain of debunking, promotion articles, goes on.
@@kepler240 Hard to say, anyway Moon is very close, and no vacuum land anywhere, so maybe but doubt with that LM contraption :)
He even said in an interview, when asked by a 8 year old girl "why we didn't go to the moon in such a long time", that we did never go in the first place. "We didn't go there" - Buzz Aldrin
I went to the moon straight after Mars. I was in a Nissan micra. An e reg silver micra that belonged to my mum. Honestly honestly I did just like buzz did 🤦🏻 🤦♀️. Does anyone know nasa has ‘lost all original footage’ check it out. All my footage was in the boot of the Nissan micra and unfortunately it got weighed in as scrap a few years ago
Forget the Stars, Moon Dust, Light Angles all you have to do is Watch the Apollo 11 out brief's , 1st they have a Teleprompter to assist with what they say, and all 3 look as if they are attending A Funeral why such odd behaviors???? as a 20 year US Navy Veteran, I have attended hundreds of in and out Briefs and Never. Ever have I witnessed such ODD behaviors, Something Stinks,,, so the question is Why, if you went ,,,,, Why no interviews, ????Why Did you Re sign, after the 1st flight??? On 19 & 20 July 1967 Buzz, Neil & Michael are in low earth orbit putting filters on the windows of the Space craft in an attempt to fool the World ??? Why Fake how far you are??? In that Clip you have A GMT time Stamp thus making the time 100%%%Accurate if you landed on the 20th of July, how are you in low Earth Orbit on 19&20 July ???? 250miles above Earth using Fakery?????THE moon is 238,000 miles from Earth, ,you asked you all 3 get mad? Why ?? Even going as far as to hit a reporter on live TV???? Why on that same flight do you have a second Ear piece feeding the CIA into NASA feed???? WHY???? Again something Stinks???
We can’t leave lower earth orbit
We?....
@@AnthonyElsom Looks like he tried and couldn't, reason why he's including himself./S
I can’t suck my own penis.
To say we didn’t go to the moon as stupid
WE EVEN WHEN TO THE SUN BUT A NIGHT
We, they, he, she, it, THEM.....
Look at their first press conference after they came back from the Moon somehow they don't look proud of what they did think, concentrate understand you have been manipulated
@@aununally4274 So it was such a dedicated conspiracy that even all three members of Apollo 1 allowed themselves to die to carry out this hoax?
I've looked at all the skeptics claims. All are flimsy and easily explained. Knowing the culture and collective mindset and determination to fulfill this incredible goal by these guys.. I'm 100% sure it happened. I do believe many conspiracies, but not this odd one.
Poor guy probably wants to tell the truth now but his whole family would probably pay for that smh
Or maybe he is telling the truth and you just don't like it. You would rather believe the absolute crap you see by binge-watching anomous armchair conspiratard youtube videos.
Anthony710 710
He seems to be dropping a lot of cryptic hints lately that it was faked
It looked like a studio covered in concrete dust. According to the deathbead confession by sombody who was there for the filming
It turns out, that 'deathbed' confession was itself a fake.
@@zounds010 lol ok tard
@@Level_No_Curve As evidence for the moon landings, we have 382 kg of moon rock, hours of live TV, hours of film, thousands of photos, stacks of measurements and scientific results, eyewitness accounts, and photos of the landing sites made by later lunar orbiters. Detailed analysis of the physics and engineering required shows that it is possible to land on the moon with 1960s technology.
Despite 50 years of trying, no moon landing denier has ever produced convincing evidence of his claims. This includes "Deathbed confessions" made by actors instead of the people they are claiming to portray.
@@zounds010 you mean the petrified wood moon rocks lol. Have a word son. There is no evidence of the supposed moon landings
@@Level_No_Curve The "petrified wood" story is bullshit. In 2006, a Dutch museum hosted an art exhibit that showcased forgeries. One of the exhibits, claiming to be a moon rock, ended up in the museum's collection afterwards; its paperwork was lost. In 2009, this was examined and found to be wood.
NASA keeps extensive records on its lunar samples. Two samples were supplied to the Netherlands, the petrified wood sample is not one of them.
So this is the level of "information" you base your opinion on.
I wish he would just spill the beans..ugh
charles davis livitus he cant. They are controlling him.
Oh god now this is a retarded post
He is a liar !! Who was filming the take off, would you really jump around on a planet surface if you had never been there ?hell no, you would be scared to death ! Notice, he never described anything about the surface
Hush. Your willful ignorance is on public display here.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 Lol, very funny... But if you landed on a surface that you had never been on, would you jump around? No
@@mab3465 You should really do yourself a big favor and go read up on the subject properly instead of coming here publicly displaying your lack of knowledge concerning the SIX Apollo Moon Landings. And by that, I don't mean watching idiotic Utube 'fake moon landing' videos either. Modern History is what it is.NOT what you think or wish it to be. And the Apollo Moon Landings are an astonishing series of events in that history. Do an honest read-up on the subject. You know, get educated and enlightened.
Buzz lyin
ruclips.net/video/dTQoNcHTUSw/видео.html We went period...
He is lying.
Buzz do you ever wonder why you keep playing this game. Has your whole life been a vain show? What a disrespect to your own soul. I can't really wrap my head around it all.
I can't 'wrap my head' around how willfully ignorant you are. You must have fallen outa the Ignorance Tree and hit every branch on the way down. !
@@apolloskyfacer5842 what about never leaving low earth orbit don't you understand. He's telling you stories. Made up storied. We've not been through the Van Allen belt. Look it up. Do you research please and change you hostile mean spirited attitude.
@@hannahzucker Your comment seems to indicate that you subscribe to the flat earth and magical dome ideas. As to the Van Allen radiation belts, here's what Van Allen himself has to say about them.
QUOTE: "The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight. The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week. However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. -- James A. Van Allen" END QUOTE
So, why do you think you understand more about the Van Allen belts than James Van Allen?
@@hannahzucker Do your research!!!” The common statement of the Hoaxtard and Flattard.
Here’s the thing. Research is a learned skill; it is hard, it is nuanced and complex, and it is true that the majority of people would not even know where to begin or even HOW to do [their own research.
Research is NOT:
Googling, scrolling your FB news-feed, or watching RUclips or 4Chan to search for the results you are hoping to find to be “true.” These are called confirmation biases, and are quickly and easily ruled out when doing actual research.
@@hannahzucker Continuing. You didn’t research anything and it is highly probable you don’t know how to do so.
Did you compile a literature review and write abstracts on each article? Or better yet, did you collect a random sample of sources and perform independent probability statistics on the reported results? No?
Did you at least take each article one by one and look into the source (that would be the author, publisher and funder), then critique the writing for logical fallacies, cognitive distortions and plain inaccuracies?
Did you ask yourself why this source might publish these particular results? Did you follow the trail of references and apply the same source of scrutiny to them?
No? Then you didn’t…research anything. You read or watched a video, most likely with little or no objectivity. You came across something in your algorithm manipulated feed, something that jived with your implicit biases and served your confirmation bias, and subconsciously applied your emotional filters and called it proof.”
This doesn’t even go into institutional review boards (IRB’s), also known as independent ethics committees, ethical review boards, or touch on peer review, or meta-analyses.
Poor guy, he must feel so uncomfortable telling this lie over and over again ...
People don't realise that the government might have threatened his and the other astronauts families if they didn't stick with NASA's story. Imagine living in fear like that. Imagine if we were in their shoes, what would you do? I feel so sorry for all of them.
As I recall the surface of the moon was so remarkable and it was regular dirt but it wasn't flat it was curved.
Earl Peters
Ummm. 17 NASA astronots have committed suicide, so far. That's the official version. #Clintonbodycount
Um, and NONE of those who committed suicide were from the Apollo era. You are reaching conspiratard.
No Apollo-era astronauts have committed suicide fool. NONE, and certainly none of the 12 that walked on the moon. You are still reaching conspiratard.
So sad, doing lying interviews again and again for money, to buy more booze, just like the McCanns..
And we are supposed to believe a conspiratard nutjob like you?
NebTheWeb you’re the one defending this man like a crazy person is he your boyfriend?
His whole way of speaking and being here screams LIES
Or maybe, he is an old man is having trouble re telling his remarkable story.
A lot of born yesterday fresh off the tit conspiratards here. Self-proclaimed shrinks weighing in with unearned hubris about their batshit nuts ideas and analysis of Aldrin. He is famous, they are not, and never will be. Flattards and conspiratards can only argue from ignorance to justify their arguments from incredulity.
mr zed I would say it screams old age.
Orane Appleby And he won't be getting any younger, so.. 🤷🏼♀️
@Brian P sure
Play PALLIATSO....Dance PALLIATSO
Am not that much into conspiracy stuff but this guy is lying, gosh!you can tell the poor guy just wish to tell the truth.
Paulo, you're a piece of mierda
Barry McCool This is fun seeing all you dumbass stupid comments.
@@MrBarrynicholas It's even more fun when I see you everywhere he goes. Lol!!!
Anupam das moran .........walking in my footsteps.
@@MrBarrynicholas Yes, exactly as you're walking in his footsteps. It's a trail, you know.
I call bs
I call troll.
@@apolloskyfacer5842 He took photos of dust, dirt , foot prints of the Moon , but didn't bother to take photos of our planet Earth . LOL🤪😜😝🤑🤣😂
He is avoiding the question because he is hiding something. Simple as that.
The Earth is flat.
Flat like you're brain
Cristian Fernandez no
Load of crap. How can you leave an impression in the fine Regolith (moon dust). There is nothing of substance in its makeup to hold any sort of imprint. No moisture.
Barry McCool Stop following me around go and annoy someone else with you drivel.
@@MrBarrynicholas Stop posting dickhead comments then..go educate yourself instead dickwad..
Tony Elsom Another super intellectual comment from someone who keeps his head in the sand. You guys certainly know how to debate. Explain how Regolith holds an imprint, surely not too difficult for you moon buddies.
@@MrBarrynicholas Lunar regolith actually holds imprints indefinitely, I would like to take you there and press your face in it, stuff the flagpole still lying around up your ass and sing the American national anthem while saluting the earth rising....check wikipedia for fuck sake.also:www.space.com/14740-footprints-moon.html
But sadly hoaxers would rather go for the hoax stuff that popped up first when I googled this...some asswipe's blogsite on wordpress....Duh
Buzz is just describing what it's like being drunk and trying to pass it off as walking on the moon.. That's why he believes that he actually went to the moon. Why do you think they call him Buzz..I will say this, he is a likable character..
Ross Michael the funniest comment on here hands down😂😆😂😂😂😂
Not really he’s a 33rd degree mason these ppl worship lucifer and drink blood etc
@@poppulseupdate conspiracy theories anyone!!!!!!!!!!!!
+oceana forrest are u saying he isn’t a 33rd degree master mason and are you denying pike’s teachings? Please; elaborate since you seem to understand freemasonry.
@@poppulseupdate that’s not what Freemasons do! Idiot.
Buzz undermines all the creditable things Armstrong says. Even Armstrong recounted in 1970 that the lunar surface was only grey in appearance when the sun was at certain angles. That A12 astronauts also saw the brownish surface of the moon. That glare prevented them from seeing the sun or stars. Then you listen to Buzz and its like "Uhmm... *grimace* erhh... well..." like was he high when he went to the moon? haha
Armstrong was a liar too
@@mab3465 Yet Armstrong still accomplished more in life than you
What a liar he has been proved to be this man! Was he blackmailed!?
I fucking love this guy.
@@ticonderoga7764 I can be open minded enough to admit that it's totally possible for the moon landing to have happened.
But, I cannot get over the fact that even today we can't pass the radiation belts. Had they done so, I doubt he'd be in such good health as we see here.
I thought he said he didn’t land on the moon
You thought wrong. Take care.
His body movements spells LIAR
Sure they went to the moon see the boot print in the mud or sand?
That's what concrete mix does.. Ha Ha Ha Ha Haaaa LMAO LIARS!!
left an impression alright... lie lie lie
He's some drunk 😂
skyhook photography To you Buzz Aldrin, may seem kind of tipsy in a certain way, but I sure hope that you look just as good as he does when you reach almost 90 years old. Lol!
You're some spiteful vindictive troll.
uh no he is making sure he picks the right words.
Lmao totally wasted
When you get to his age, come back and tell us you came through or achieved half of what he has, idiot.
When you get that old, I'm sure it's hard to keep the lies going. Well maybe not. He's been lying bout the moon for a longgg time. He's a pro
...and you are the typical conspiratard nut job.
To see an unjust you have to look for it. Now what gives away lies the best ? Body language ! I challenge any sane minding person to view the "Ground Sero" press conference and then say "there was nothing dodgy about that". It's (so)obviously a scripted monitored controlled "offering". There's no emotion in those fellas reactions to anything acting petrified (no pun😂) to say the wrong thing and they find it impossible to answer a question on their own without clarification from the other two first. That and that "press show" alone proves that all is not above board with the moon landing claims.
The moon landings are not a 'claim', they are FACT. All of you self-proclaimed conspiratard shrinks should stick to your day jobs at wall-mart. You are as bad as all of the couch potato general managers and coaches in the NFL.
How does he know when he's never been 😱😱
Oh yes he has. YOU, on the other hand, are a nobody. A conspiratard who probably hasn't even learned to wipe your ass yet.
that's the stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard.
I'm not sure whether he knows whether he has or not
George Shepherd Why do you fear science?
Nothing worse than listening to a DRUNK LIAR! MAKING IT AS HE GOES!#REPENT BUZZ OR FACE JUDGEMENT!# YOU TOLD THAT LITTLE GIRL A LIE!
Ironically the moons surface is jst like that of a nevada dessert
Well that is what I Say! REMARKABLE! Super duper dry dry and dry dust in dry atmosphere allowing 100% Perfect deep sole prints, even while walking. 😲
(apparently that was impossible, proof 2001 was fake.... had to funny; skip, hop, bounce, kangaroo, to move around)😉
He's lyin sorry he can't even explain delayed descriptions of confusion. An no it's not old age or he would not be interviewed. .
I can see you are a woman of genius.
@@adksherm I can see you are a total tit.
@@gingerlilly10 dang, and she's classy
@@basedmoonman9341 excuse me what.?
@@gingerlilly10 he said your classy ( sarcasm).🤣
You know it’s a sin to tell a lie
Liar
He really knows....
Poor guy. Brainwashed.
Not on his life but business depends on it.
He doesn’t sound very convincing…….go figure……
Dude he is an old old man , i wanna see your energy and how u speak when you reach his age
Lol 5 seconds in and I’m already laughing at the failed attempt at sounding normal, let alone honest... “It was a gradual hmm... ppphhhhhph”
Well said... sound like the exact words Stanley Kubrick would have used... can you say Van Allen Radiation Belts...???
Bullshit!
pants on fire. poor eye contact
shahbasharat BAM! Finally evidence of a hoax!
🙄